Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?

Author Topic: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?  (Read 15878 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Deca

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,933
  • If at first you don't succeed try, try & try again
Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« on: February 06, 2013, 04:10:15 PM »
Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
http://www.infowars.com/is-the-universe-a-computer-simulation/


again I not going to argue weather this is true or not  but rather point out that "they" are building and synthetic man made  matrix around the earth via the communications network on earth....Dr persinger points out that all our brains are submerged in the natural earths magnetic field  but also ever so more the communications grid of towers and satellites..

so my fear is they are using this scientific discovery's to prime us into accepting/deceiving us to be hooked up to this man made matrix believing we are tapping into the real natural matrix of the universe

Michael Persinger on No More Secrets
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l6VPpDublg

Offline compguygene

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2013, 05:05:33 PM »
I think that the scientists here are almost correct.

I believe that this universe exists as a result of the thought and intention of God.  As such, to the narrow minded it would appear to be a computer simulation.  God has no need of computers, he existed before them and will exist after they no longer exist.  Before this universe existed, He was. He made all that is for his own pleasure, just as any creator creates for his own pleasure. 
We have no government armed in power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other. -John Adams

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,130
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2013, 06:24:49 PM »
I don't necessarily agree nor disagree with any of the views expressed in the following clip; I offer it merely as food for thought, since there are so many questions about the "nature of reality" to which we simply do not have definitive answers:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4uVdetjt_w
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,130
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2013, 06:36:23 PM »
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Deca

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,933
  • If at first you don't succeed try, try & try again
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2013, 07:01:01 PM »
again I never started the thread to discus the "nature of reality" but expose and warn of the possible fake synthetic "reality" they are building around us

what do you think these megalomaniacs would do with mind weapons and  "voice of god" technology ? that can tap into your brain and nervous system ?

 The Neuro Revolution - Full HD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBK8SkOjMTw

get the idea of there fake "gods" and "matrix"
Zardoz Speaks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOROvO2fxTc


but it will not be from a speaker in a stone statue but from beam directly into you cranium and probably exploit your belief and personal values




Offline Tokiem

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 747
    • http://www.historiansagainstwar.org/blog/2008/04/mark-twains-flag-for-american-colony-in.html
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2013, 07:14:51 PM »


Is it possible the Human Spirit may rise up above, separate and away from the physical body, pain and suffering?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E37cMtCrKoA



Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,130
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2013, 07:19:53 PM »
again I never started the thread to discus the "nature of reality"

Then the question in your thread title is misleading, because it's impossible to answer if one chooses in advance to ignore the more fundamental question of what the nature of reality is.

Quote
but expose and warn of the possible fake synthetic "reality" they are building around us

How do you know what's "fake" if you don't even know what's "real"?

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnEYHQ9dscY

One cannot answer that question by begging it.

I'm not trying to be argumentative, just pointing out that there are certain types of questions that simply can't be answered one way or the other if the underlying questions they inevitably raise are left unaddressed.

The following is an entertaining illustration of what I mean:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjGRySVyTDk
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Jackson Holly

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,758
  • It's the TV, stupid!
    • JACKSON HOLLY'S OLD HOME PLACE
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2013, 07:31:14 PM »

I don't see the 'universe' at all as digital ... I
see it as a continuous analog flow. I am not
surprised though, that the folks at WIRED,et al,
describe their 'intelligent design' epiphany as
a 'computer simulation' or some such ... since
the computer startup a few years ago
we all tend to think in those terms. All-in-all
a positive 'leap of faith' I think.
St. Augustine: “The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it.
Let it loose; it will defend itself."

Offline Deca

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,933
  • If at first you don't succeed try, try & try again
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2013, 07:44:42 PM »
again my point is they have MIND WEAPONS .....and want to create and computer controlled "hive mind".. were our brains are wired into there control grid.....i.e a real "matrix" ...i.e turn us into the borg

so I believe the new age kind of concept of a collective/infinite "conscious" or the idea of a holographic /simulation universe could be used/hijack to deceive us into being assimilation  into a man made synthetic matrix that uses the communications   network to tap into our brains and nervous system to control our perception and our own "reality" i.e turn our brains into a personal "holodeck"

  




Quote
Dream warriors? U.S. military to research 'battlefield illusions' to baffle enemies

    Will use hi-tech optics and sound to confuse enemies
    Research division is investing $4 million in technology
    Aims to cause 'auditory and visual' hallucinations

By Rob Waugh
UPDATED: 05:03, 16 February 2012

    Comments (44)
    Share

The American military's technology research division Darpa is to investigate hi tech 'battlefield illusions' designed to baffle enemy troops, according to budget figures announced this week.

The Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency is investing $4 million in the project, which includes research into causing  'auditory and visual' hallucinations in enemy troops.

The technologies could be similar to current measures designed to confuse radar systems, but applied to human beings.

The research division Darpa aims to create 'battlefield illusions' to baffle enemies - and is investing $4 million in the technology

The research division Darpa aims to create 'battlefield illusions' to baffle enemies - and is investing $4 million in the technology

The 'illusions' would likely use optical technology, and will be built to be mounted on vehicles.

'The current operational art of human-sensory battlefield deception is largely an ad-hoc practice,' says the agency.

The agency aims to investigate 'how humans use their brains to process sensory inputs,' to create technologies that will provide a tactical advantage on the battlefield.

 
More...

    London landmarks ringed with blue to highlight how the capital could sink beneath 30m of water by 3012
    The outer limits: Incredible video shows what the sun would look like seen from the freezing surface of dwarf planet Pluto

Darpa says it aims to, 'Demonstrate and assess the operational effectiveness of advanced human-deceptive technologies on military ground, sea, and airborne systems,' according to the report in Wired.

Wired magazine's Noah Schachtman says, 'This is not the first time that military researchers have tried to confuse foes with sights or sounds that aren’t really there.'
Optical illusion: Darpa says it aims to, 'Demonstrate and assess the operational effectiveness of advanced human-deceptive technologies on military ground, sea, and airborne systems'

Optical illusion: Darpa says it aims to, 'Demonstrate and assess the operational effectiveness of advanced human-deceptive technologies on military ground, sea, and airborne systems'

'The defense contractor BAE Systems recently developed an 'invisibility cloak' which it says can hide vehicles’ infrared signature,' says Schachtman.

'In the early years of the war on terror, many in the defense tech community floated the idea of a 'Voice off God' weapon. The idea was to use directed sound waves to convince would-be jihadis that Allah himself was speaking in their ears — and ordering them to put down their suicide belts.'

In the Fifties, the UK and U.S. governments both researched using 'weaponised' forms of LSD and another hallucinogen, BZ, for battlefield use.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2101494/Ghost-warriors-U-S-military-research-battlefield-illusions-baffle-enemies.html#ixzz2KAXmAYEe
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



Offline James Redford

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
  • The State is the coldest of all cold monsters.
    • The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2013, 11:57:16 AM »
Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
http://www.infowars.com/is-the-universe-a-computer-simulation/

again I not going to argue weather this is true or not  but rather point out that "they" are building and synthetic man made  matrix around the earth via the communications network on earth....Dr persinger points out that all our brains are submerged in the natural earths magnetic field  but also ever so more the communications grid of towers and satellites..

so my fear is they are using this scientific discovery's to prime us into accepting/deceiving us to be hooked up to this man made matrix believing we are tapping into the real natural matrix of the universe

Michael Persinger on No More Secrets
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l6VPpDublg

The article which you cite above by Paul Joseph Watson, "Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?" (Infowars.com, Feb. 6, 2013), is based upon the following article by Prof. Silas R. Beane (University of New Hampshire; University of Washington; Universität Bonn), Zohreh Davoudi (University of Washington) and Prof. Martin J. Savage (University of Washington):

"Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation", arXiv:1210.1847, Oct. 4, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1847 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012arXiv1210.1847B

For much more on the topic of computer emulation of the universe vis-à-vis science and religion, see my below article, which details physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE) correctly describing and unifying all the forces in physics. The Omega Point cosmology demonstrates that the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) require that the universe end in the Omega Point: the final cosmological singularity and state of infinite informational capacity having all the unique properties traditionally claimed for God, and of which is a different aspect of the Big Bang initial singularity, i.e., the first cause.

For anyone who has ever wondered about such questions as what the meaning of life is, what the purpose of their own life is, whether there is life after death, whether God exists, what the future holds for humanity, and why anything exists at all as opposed to nothingness, then this article answers all of those questions using the known laws of physics.

This article further provides an examination of the globalist political power-elite: history is given on their organizational structure and their methods of accumulating power; and analysis is given on where they're attempting to take the world, i.e., their self-termed New World Order world government and world religion.

The article furnishes documentation on what the globalist oligarchy's ultimate goal is. This ultimate goal of theirs most popularly goes by the name of transhumanism: immortality through technology. However, I explain in the article that the coming radical life-extension technologies create a fundamental dilemma for the oligarchs, which is why they must dominate world society before such technology becomes a reality. The details of that dilemma are explained in Sec. 8.2.2: "The Mark of the Beast" of the article.

Thus, this article explains to people what is to occur and why it is to occur, so that they will not be in ignorance as to the events that are to unfold.

Below one can download the article for free. I encourage everyone to generously share this article with others. By all means, please save it to your hard-drive and give others copies of it. Also, feel free to share the text of this post. The article is in PDF format.

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF, 1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/details/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://webcitation.org/6Abfap2bp , http://flashmirrors.com/files/1ndt5blb0l1eyhd/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://depositfiles.com/files/eybo55tie , http://ziddu.com/download/21165225/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf.html , http://2shared.com/document/l4Ygh2xH/Redford-Physics-of-God.html

Below is the abstract to my above article:

""
ABSTRACT: Analysis is given of the Omega Point cosmology, an extensively peer-reviewed proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) published in leading physics journals by professor of physics and mathematics Frank J. Tipler, which demonstrates that in order for the known laws of physics to be mutually consistent, the universe must diverge to infinite computational power as it collapses into a final cosmological singularity, termed the Omega Point. The theorem is an intrinsic component of the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE) describing and unifying all the forces in physics, of which itself is also required by the known physical laws. With infinite computational resources, the dead can be resurrected--never to die again--via perfect computer emulation of the multiverse from its start at the Big Bang. Miracles are also physically allowed via electroweak quantum tunneling controlled by the Omega Point cosmological singularity. The Omega Point is a different aspect of the Big Bang cosmological singularity--the first cause--and the Omega Point has all the haecceities claimed for God in the traditional religions.

From this analysis, conclusions are drawn regarding the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the Omega Point cosmology.
""

Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science journals.[1] Even NASA itself has peer-reviewed his Omega Point Theorem and found it correct according to the known laws of physics (see below). No refutation of it exists within the peer-reviewed scientific literature, or anywhere else for that matter.

Below are some of the peer-reviewed papers in physics and science journals and proceedings wherein Prof. Tipler has published his Omega Point cosmology:

* Frank J. Tipler, "Cosmological Limits on Computation", International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 6 (June 1986), pp. 617-661, doi:10.1007/BF00670475, bibcode: 1986IJTP...25..617T. (First paper on the Omega Point cosmology.) http://webcitation.org/64KHgOccs , http://flashmirrors.com/files/enznbp2ydodyrh1/Tipler-Cosmological-Limits-on-Computation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Sensorium of God: Newton and Absolute Space", bibcode: 1988nnds.conf..215T, in G[eorge]. V. Coyne, M[ichal]. Heller and J[ozef]. Zycinski (Eds.), "Message" by Franciszek Macharski, Newton and the New Direction in Science: Proceedings of the Cracow Conference, 25 to 28 May 1987 (Vatican City: Specola Vaticana, 1988), pp. 215-228, LCCN 88162460, bibcode: 1988nnds.conf.....C. http://webcitation.org/69Vb0JF1W , http://flashmirrors.com/files/0z5yzd35jcsbe16/Tipler-Sensorium-of-God.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point Theory: A Model of an Evolving God", in Robert J. Russell, William R. Stoeger and George V. Coyne (Eds.), message by John Paul II, Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A Common Quest for Understanding (Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, 2nd ed., 2005; orig. pub. 1988), pp. 313-331, ISBN 0268015775, LCCN 89203331, bibcode: 1988pptc.book.....R. http://webcitation.org/69VaKG2nd , http://flashmirrors.com/files/6ehek7bcf1r60fr/Tipler-Omega-Point-Theory.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for Philosophers", in Arthur Fine and Jarrett Leplin (Eds.), PSA 1988: Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers (East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, 1989), pp. 27-48, ISBN 091758628X. http://webcitation.org/69VarCM3I , http://flashmirrors.com/files/iwmn0ma8531d0oa/Tipler-Anthropic-Principle.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions for Scientists", Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, Vol. 24, No. 2 (June 1989), pp. 217-253, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.1989.tb01112.x. Republished as Chapter 7: "The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions to Scientists" in Carol Rausch Albright and Joel Haugen (Eds.), Beginning with the End: God, Science, and Wolfhart Pannenberg (Chicago, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Company, 1997), pp. 156-194, ISBN 0812693256, LCCN 97000114. http://webcitation.org/5nY0aytpz , http://flashmirrors.com/files/habdjyfscxxlzdt/tipler-omega-point-as-eschaton.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The ultimate fate of life in universes which undergo inflation", Physics Letters B, Vol. 286, Nos. 1-2 (July 23, 1992), pp. 36-43, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90155-W, bibcode: 1992PhLB..286...36T. http://webcitation.org/64Uskd785 , http://flashmirrors.com/files/pqt2sdz4muzgiqs/Tipler-Life-in-universes-which-undergo-inflation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "A New Condition Implying the Existence of a Constant Mean Curvature Foliation", bibcode: 1993dgr2.conf..306T, in B[ei]. L. Hu and T[ed]. A. Jacobson (Eds.), Directions in General Relativity: Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland, Volume 2: Papers in Honor of Dieter Brill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 306-315, ISBN 0521452678, bibcode: 1993dgr2.conf.....H. http://webcitation.org/5qbXJZiX5 , http://flashmirrors.com/files/wrzpnyvxjum37xs/tipler-constant-mean-curvature-foliation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate Future of the Universe", NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop Proceedings, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Jan. 1999, pp. 111-119; an invited paper in the proceedings of a conference held at and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, Aug. 12-14, 1997; doi:2060/19990023204. Document ID: 19990023204. Report Number: E-11429; NAS 1.55:208694; NASA/CP-1999-208694. http://webcitation.org/5zPq69I0O , http://flashmirrors.com/files/1fwhqnjmqyarygz/tipler-ultrarelativistic-rockets.pdf Full proceedings volume: http://webcitation.org/69zAxm0sT

* Frank J. Tipler, "There Are No Limits To The Open Society", Critical Rationalist, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Sept. 23, 1998). http://webcitation.org/5sFYkHgSS , http://flashmirrors.com/files/tck5alsxiqnh561/Tipler-No-Limits-To-The-Open-Society.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, Jessica Graber, Matthew McGinley, Joshua Nichols-Barrer and Christopher Staecker, "Closed Universes With Black Holes But No Event Horizons As a Solution to the Black Hole Information Problem", arXiv:gr-qc/0003082, Mar. 20, 2000. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0003082 Published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 379, No. 2 (Aug. 2007), pp. 629-640, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11895.x, bibcode: 2007MNRAS.379..629T. http://webcitation.org/5vQ3M8uxB , http://flashmirrors.com/files/nppi6h6fjup6jmh/Tipler-et-al-Closed-universes-with-no-event-horizons.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Ultimate Future of the Universe, Black Hole Event Horizon Topologies, Holography, and the Value of the Cosmological Constant", arXiv:astro-ph/0104011, Apr. 1, 2001. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0104011 Published in J. Craig Wheeler and Hugo Martel (Eds.), Relativistic Astrophysics: 20th Texas Symposium, Austin, TX, 10-15 Dec. 2000 (Melville, N.Y.: American Institute of Physics, 2001), pp. 769-772, ISBN 0735400261, LCCN 2001094694, which is AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 586 (Oct. 15, 2001), doi:10.1063/1.1419654, bibcode: 2001AIPC..586.....W.

* Frank J. Tipler, "Intelligent life in cosmology", International Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Apr. 2003), pp. 141-148, doi:10.1017/S1473550403001526, bibcode: 2003IJAsB...2..141T. http://webcitation.org/5o9QHKGuW , http://flashmirrors.com/files/ra8udwazebfspph/tipler-intelligent-life-in-cosmology.pdf Also at arXiv:0704.0058, Mar. 31, 2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0058

* F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers", Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (Apr. 2005), pp. 897-964, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R04, bibcode: 2005RPPh...68..897T. http://129.81.170.14/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf Also released as "Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended Standard Model as a Theory of Everything", arXiv:0704.3276, Apr. 24, 2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276

* Frank J. Tipler, "Inevitable Existence and Inevitable Goodness of the Singularity", Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 19, Nos. 1-2 (2012), pp. 183-193. http://webcitation.org/69JEi5wHp , http://flashmirrors.com/files/k0pfzw6xvixmk6t/Tipler-Existence-and-Goodness-of-the-Singularity.pdf

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in which the above August 2007 paper was published, is one of the world's leading peer-reviewed astrophysics journals.

Prof. Tipler's paper "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate Future of the Universe" was an invited paper for a conference held at and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, so NASA itself has peer-reviewed Tipler's Omega Point Theorem (peer-review is a standard process for published proceedings papers; and again, Tipler's said paper was an *invited* paper by NASA, as opposed to what are called "poster papers").

Zygon is the world's leading peer-reviewed academic journal on science and religion.

Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics paper--which presents the Omega Point/Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE)--was selected as one of 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68]. Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal Website." (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, "Highlights of 2005", Reports on Progress in Physics. http://webcitation.org/5o9VkK3eE )

Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further, Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact factor reflects the importance the science community places in that journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own papers.

For much more on these matters, see my above-cited article "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything" in addition to my below website:

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.ifastnet.com , http://theophysics.freevar.com

The only way to avoid the Omega Point cosmology is to reject the known laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and hence to reject empirical science: as these physical laws have been confirmed by every experiment to date. That is, there exists no rational reason for thinking that the Omega Point cosmology is incorrect, and indeed, one must engage in extreme irrationality in order to argue against the Omega Point cosmology.

Additionally, we now have the quantum gravity Theory of Everything (TOE) required by the known laws of physics and that correctly describes and unifies all the forces in physics: of which inherently produces the Omega Point cosmology. So here we have an additional high degree of assurance that the Omega Point cosmology is correct.

-----

Note:

1. While there is a lot that gets published in physics journals that is anti-reality and non-physical (such as String Theory, which violates the known laws of physics and has no experimental support whatsoever), the reason such things are allowed to pass the peer-review process is because the paradigm of assumptions which such papers are speaking to has been made known, and within their operating paradigm none of the referees could find anything crucially wrong with said papers. That is, the paradigm itself may have nothing to do with reality, but the peer-reviewers could find nothing fundamentally wrong with such papers within the operating assumptions of that paradigm. Whereas, e.g., the operating paradigm of Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics paper and his other papers on the Omega Point Theorem is the known laws of physics, i.e., our actual physical reality which has been repeatedly confirmed by every experiment conducted to date. So the professional physicists charged with refereeing these papers could find nothing fundamentally wrong with them within their operating paradigm, i.e., the known laws of physics.
Author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001) http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761

Theophysics (a website with information on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theory) http://theophysics.host56.com http://theophysics.ifastnet.com

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2013, 12:16:48 PM »

We are all running on Gods Laptop.
The problem is the Virus called the Illuminati.  


    ~    EvadingGrid



Offline James Redford

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
  • The State is the coldest of all cold monsters.
    • The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2013, 04:16:59 PM »

We are all running on Gods Laptop.
The problem is the Virus called the Illuminati.  


    ~    EvadingGrid



Regarding the Illuminati, see pp. 94 ff. of my following article. For who really rule the world, see under the heading "The New World Order: Government’s Attempt at Autoapotheosis", pp. 87-98 of my below article.

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/details/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
Author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001) http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761

Theophysics (a website with information on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theory) http://theophysics.host56.com http://theophysics.ifastnet.com

Offline egypt

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,787
  • Love: A Wish to bestow the fullness of Joyous Life
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2013, 04:29:59 PM »
I don't necessarily agree nor disagree with any of the views expressed in the following clip; I offer it merely as food for thought, since there are so many questions about the "nature of reality" to which we simply do not have definitive answers:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4uVdetjt_w

Geolib - my thoughts went to David Icke immediately with this.   I believe God created ~all.~  However, how does the Saturn-Moon transmissions idea fit in with all this?

I was completely amazed with Alex's show yesterday.  It is unreal how he keeps up with science, along with everything else going on.  Just think if our destiny as humankind were being decided in "favor" of humankind - what could be done...

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,130
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2013, 02:42:20 PM »
Arguably Alex's best interview of David Icke yet:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1u6bkBD3nA (David Icke: Rediscovering The Matrix)
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline decemberfellow

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,061
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #14 on: February 13, 2013, 05:03:09 PM »
Matt 24:22
Quote
  And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.

egypt:
Quote
Just think if our destiny as humankind were being decided in "favor" of humankind - what could be done...



It looks to me like it is decided .
Rev21:4
And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.


Who am I
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Fk6dt_uHo

Offline Deca

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,933
  • If at first you don't succeed try, try & try again
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #15 on: February 13, 2013, 11:25:20 PM »
think about it.....if you load a picture into a graphics program then zoomed in and zoomed in to one pixel how are you going to figure out how the picture was formed ? ....you would lose all meaning and context of the picture ......or look at one house brick and trying to figure out how a house was built from one brick ??

also what did the universe big banged into ? or would not the outer edge not be a matrix lattice anyway ?  

again this can be all head wrecking....again interesting subject

but sometimes you have to stick to want you know


Quote
Project BlueBeam 2012

Project Bluebeam 2012 is a secret government project to bring in the new world order.Project BlueBeam has been designed to destabilise religious doctrines and form one world religion, a second coming so to speak, only this time, the one god to rule them all will be the antichrist.Four keystages will need to be comopleted for project bluebeam to work, these four stages will be done in sequence culminating in the birth of the New World Order.
Project Blue Beam Stages

Stage 1

The first stage of Project BlueBeam 2012 is to destabilise world religions and convince people that their religious beliefs and teachings are wrong. This will be done by faking earthquakes at pre-selected locations and faking archeological discoveries that will cast doubt on all religious teachings and beliefs.

Ark of the covenant at Thasos in greece.
Egyptian hall of records

Stage 2

Holographic images will be projected into the sky, these projections will be in the image of each religions god and will speak in each language. Once this is over the god will merge into the one true god,The Antichrist.

Stage 3

Telepathy will be used to make people think that the one true god is speaking to them, telling them that scriptures and religious foundations are wrong. This will be done using russian technology and low frequency radio waves.

Stage 4

Make the world think an Alien Invasion is about to occur.
Make christians think the rapture is about to occur
Use electrical systems to allow supernatural forces to travel.

The New World Order wants chaos to ensue, so that the people of the world will be desperate to accept the new world order.

again I believe there is been over hype about stage 2 ...and that this will not happen or not to the degree people think

stage 3 i know that they have the capability to do this....but don`t know if they can do this on mass



 

 

Offline Deca

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,933
  • If at first you don't succeed try, try & try again
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #16 on: February 14, 2013, 12:22:59 AM »
 The wave particle paradox - Boundaries of the Knowable (9/10)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nvgGk8A3oo


Offline Deca

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,933
  • If at first you don't succeed try, try & try again
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #17 on: February 14, 2013, 12:36:24 AM »
Explained ! The Double Slit Experiment
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LW6Mq352f0E


measurement, science etc.....is an concept/construction  of the human brain

Offline Wowo51

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #18 on: March 01, 2013, 05:56:27 PM »
I'm not sure but you're headed in an interesting direction.  I still prefer the field theories of consciousness. 

Offline Donovan

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2013, 12:59:30 PM »
I dont know if this universe is a simulation, or if we are being held prisoner in a virtual reality like system (either by our fellow human beings, or by another species), or if we are doing it to ourselves to extend our lives and give us multiple chances in multiple lives to learn from our mistakes. 

Either way it is possible.  Just go to any video game creation website/forum, video game engine, or even try it yourself, and you'll see if you use your imagination and fast forward 1000 years from now, that computing and virtual reality/gaming wont be that far out of reach to bind with human consciousness/memory/emotions enough to fool the person in it.  Its getting pretty damn close to it now.

For all we know, we could be in a virtual reality world, thats in a virtual reality world, thats in a virtual world, and that each time you "die" in one world, you end up going to another. So for example, death here on the Earth virtual reality world = going on to the heaven or hell virtual reality world, or somewhere else depending on what you believe in, and if you decide to move on from that point, maybe you can choose to be something like new character on some other planet, other virtual reality world. It could literally go on and on.  You could technically live thousands of lives and actually only aged 1 minute or 1 hour in your true physical self with a system like that, making it close to immorality as possible.

It would be totally messed up if when people die, all of sudden you wake up and you realize "hey that was just a VR game/simulation just for shits and giggles". It would probably be profound and life changing to that individual to say the least.


So in that sense, we probably shouldnt be actively digging to try and find out if the universe is a simulation, because it could mean "game over". But like all computerized systems, their are always glitches, exploits, and advantageous knowledge to give a player an edge over the rest .... now if we could tap into that .... that would be great.

Offline LaBrat-Sass

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?
« Reply #20 on: November 25, 2016, 03:38:52 PM »
The paradox here is that there would be nothing outside of the universe itself for to 'simulate'. The "beehive mind" fantasy - first proposed in sidney sheldon's 'The President's Analyst' in '67 - is unable to come up with a solution for the problem of electromagnetic interference, which makes remote mind reading a pipe-dream.