McCain: We would be directly responsible for Syrian massacre

Author Topic: McCain: We would be directly responsible for Syrian massacre  (Read 2740 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stymo1

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,890
McCain: We would be directly responsible for Syrian massacre
« on: December 07, 2012, 11:24:14 AM »
In this interview on Fox news last evening John McCain made the claim that if we did not go into Syria on a preventive mission, we would be responsible for the deaths of thousands of Syrians should Assad release his chemical weapons (Sarin Gas) on his own people. He claims the weapons have been assembled and are ready to launch, and they have a shelf life of 60 days. He even went so far as to say we should place US troops on the ground to "secure" said weapons. (8:00 minute mark) What a perfect setup to allow for false flag events to lead us into another war in the region...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2017376293001/
" It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it." -- George Carlin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q

Offline stymo1

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,890
Re: McCain: We would be directly responsible for Syrian massacre
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2012, 11:51:06 AM »
Report: NATO Military Intervention In Syria “Imminent”


http://www.infowars.com/report-nato-military-intervention-in-syria-imminent/


Special forces mass in preparation for final assault

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
December 7, 2012

Following the arrival of the USS Eisenhower in the Mediterranean sea just outside Syria, reports are now circulating that other NATO forces are firmly in place to launch an “imminent” Libya-style military assault to topple President Bashar Al-Assad.

“Sources close to the French Defense Ministry reported Friday, Dec. 7, that a Western-Arab military intervention against the Assad regime is due to begin shortly with the participation of the US, France, Britain, Turkey, Jordan and other anti-Assad Arab nations,” reports Israeli news outlet DebkaFile, adding that Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar’s special forces will also be involved.

Following the news earlier this week that the USS Eisenhower and the USS Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group are now stationed in waters just outside Syria, the latest report adds that the French aircraft carrier Charles De Gaullehas also joined the fray.

Training exercises involving British and French special forces in recent weeks have concentrated on attacking fortifications in the Alawite mountains, which is where Assad is predicted to escape to should he flee Damascus.

The report adds that the assault, “Would be modeled on the Western intervention in Libya in 2011. It would combine an aerial blitz with ground action by special forces for destroying Assad’s chemical weapons stocks, his air force and his air defense systems.”

The attack could be preceded by an announcement that Assad has used chemical weapons, which the White House has made clear represents a “red line” that would mandate military intervention.

The sudden deluge of hysteria suggesting, “The Syrian military is prepared to use chemical weapons against its own people and is awaiting final orders from President Bashar Assad,” is based entirely on dubious claims by anonymous “US officials”.

In setting the stage for war, the establishment media has repeated talking points almost identical to those that preceded the US invasion of Iraq, despite the fact that rhetoric about Saddam Hussein’s “weapons of mass destruction” turned out to be based on completely fabricated evidence.

In backing the rebel assault on Syria, the United States and NATO powers have, just like in Libya, aligned themselves with Al-Qaeda terrorists who have killed U.S. troops and sworn to target America after Assad falls while seeking to impose draconian Sharia law across the whole region.

Of course, the possibility remains that all the rhetoric concerning an “imminent” NATO intervention could be part of a psychological propaganda campaign aimed at destabilizing the Assad government and convincing both ministers and members of the Syrian Army to defect.

A similar effort was attempted months ago when reports circulated that rebels were surrounding Damascus and that the endgame was near, but the stories turned out to be little more than hot air.
" It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it." -- George Carlin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,780
    • Sasha
Re: McCain: We would be directly responsible for Syrian massacre
« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2012, 12:32:08 PM »
In this interview on Fox news last evening John McCain made the claim that if we did not go into Syria on a preventive mission, we would be responsible for the deaths of thousands of Syrians should Assad release his chemical weapons (Sarin Gas) on his own people. He claims the weapons have been assembled and are ready to launch, and they have a shelf life of 60 days. He even went so far as to say we should place US troops on the ground to "secure" said weapons. (8:00 minute mark) What a perfect setup to allow for false flag events to lead us into another war in the region...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2017376293001/

He was as aweful a warmongering hawk as I ever seen him.  Gretta was no different, both almost declaring the certainty of a horrible invasion with strangly giddy and failingly somber facial expressions.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,306
    • The Great Deception
Re: McCain: We would be directly responsible for Syrian massacre
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2012, 03:48:45 PM »
To McCain: You mean just like you, and all who believed the lies about WMDs in Iraq, are all responsible for the massacre in Iraq?

All of you warmongers have a lot of blood on your hands and think nothing of that! So don't act like you care about people! You don't! Your words are empty!





Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,461
Re: McCain: We would be directly responsible for Syrian massacre
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2012, 05:46:46 AM »
LIl Johny has a history, it not the fairy tale the MSM spin.
Hid dad was an Admiral/political insider, elitist. Any embarassing facts about Johny have been sealed, covered, dropeed down the black hole. In return Johnny has been and will allways be one of the gang on high, especially so a  as fronnt man for invasion, wars, military expansion.
0:42 Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran - YouTube► 0:42► 0:42br.youtube.com/watch?v=o-zoPgv_nYg
19/04/2007 - por mckathomas
John McCain's chart-topping single "Bomb Iran"by bravenewfilms289,210 views; ...Mais vídeos para johny mccain, bomb, bomb, bomb, iran »
What he finds is that McCain graduated in the bottom 1 per cent of his Annapolis class — and then got a plum assignment as an aircraft carrier pilot –  perhaps because both his father and grandfather were four-star admirals.
SS Forestal:
McCain crashed 5 jets, plus he was responsible for the horrible USS Forrestal fire In 1967.

Surviving crewmen and those who investigated the Forrestal fire case reported that McCain deliberately 'wet-started' his A-4E Skyhawk to shake up the guy in the F-4 Phantom behind his A-4.

'Wet-starts', done either deliberately (the starter motor switch allowed kerosene to pool in the engine and give a wet start) or accidentally, shoot a large flame from the tail of the aircraft. In McCain's case, the 'wet-start' 'cooked off' and launched the M34 Zuni rocket from the rear F-4 that punctured the Skyhawk's fuel tank, knocked the M-65 1000 lb. bomb off it's 500 lb. rated mount, and touched off the explosions and massive fire. ( I know a guy who was crash cre on this aircraft carrie, though he was reluctant to get into it) he had spent days tearing burnt coprses from the bulkhead of the ship, he mentioned Mccains BS to me)McCain was quickly (they were still counting the Forrestal dead) transferred to the USS Oriskany LIL Johny  (the only Forrestal crewman to be immediately transferred).
 Vietnam POW Activists Called McCain ‘Songbird’ , POW internment sealed.When he returned, there were several of the American prisoners, to include five colonels, Colonel Ted Guy, was the one that wanted to prefer charges against McCain and two or three other returned POWs because during the time they were in prison, they were not acting in accordance with the military code.  And as a result of these other colonels wanting to prefer charges against them, the Secretaries of the services got together and they decided that, No, they did not want these 'renegade' (my word, renegade) prisoners of war coming home to be charged and court marshaled.

SC: educateyourself/SC:Vietnam POW Activists Called McCain 'Songbird'  ...www.pensitoreview.com/.../in-1992-pows-accuse

SC:www.counterpunch.org/2008/06/13/mcnasty/Em cache

Offline Valerius

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,865
Re: McCain: We would be directly responsible for Syrian massacre
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2012, 07:20:02 AM »
$50 an hour lettuce picking jobs for all
"No man can put a chain about the ankle of his fellow man without at last finding the other end fastened about his own neck."  -Frederick Douglass

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,461
Re: McCain: We would be directly responsible for Syrian massacre
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2012, 09:19:06 AM »
$50 an hour lettuce picking jobs for all
             Or GM crops and spraying roundup weed (people) killer.