D.R. Griffin omits key evidence in Mineta/Cheney article(s)

[johndoraemi]

THESE ARE "THE ORDERS"

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINTCHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/cjcsd/cjcsi/3610_01a.pdf

It really annoys me how Griffin can omit this most obvious piece of evidence from every article he writes about Mineta/Cheney.

These June 1st 2001 orders directly address "AIR PIRACY (HIJACKING)", and they require "approval" from the "Secretary of Defense" before authorizing any interceptors. Since no "approval" was given by Rumsfeld (MIA), this was an obvious way of stopping Norad from authorizing scrambles. Cheney is confirming that the letter of these orders be followed, and therefore Cheney and Rumsfeld are working together to suppress fighter response.

Griffin should be the first person to show this document's relevance, not the last. Omitting the possibility entirely from the discussion is let's say counterproductive.

http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

[jimd3100]

THESE ARE "THE ORDERS"

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINTCHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/cjcsd/cjcsi/3610_01a.pdf

It really annoys me how Griffin can omit this most obvious piece of evidence from every article he writes about Mineta/Cheney.

These June 1st 2001 orders directly address "AIR PIRACY (HIJACKING)", and they require "approval" from the "Secretary of Defense" before authorizing any interceptors. Since no "approval" was given by Rumsfeld (MIA), this was an obvious way of stopping Norad from authorizing scrambles. Cheney is confirming that the letter of these orders be followed, and therefore Cheney and Rumsfeld are working together to suppress fighter response.

Griffin should be the first person to show this document's relevance, not the last. Omitting the possibility entirely from the discussion is let's say counterproductive.

http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

This is a very good point you show. Thanks for this! Also as I wrote in another post, there is a recent Rumsfeld biography out that details his actions on 9/11. And his actions show guilt. They certainly show he was avoiding the NMCC, and why? Because he was busy having a private conversation with President Bush, that neither one can remember......
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=10146.0

[jimd3100]

I have a challenge to all you researchers out there. Find out the name of the CIA official who was giving Rummy his briefing that morning. I have a feeling that is a name we wont find, but let's give it a try. Reason? Because they are guilty of mass murder on 9/11. We know Cheney is guilty, we know Rummy is guilty, this CIA official is guilty as well, we need to know who he is. Why I feel this way? Because in June of 2001 (same month regulations were changed for flight intercepts)war games were conducted where hijackers flew into the wtc. Tenet claimed the system was blinking red that summer...the CIA was tracking hijackers into America, and when you and I and the rest of the world knew we were under attack when that second plane hit, the official story is.....Rumsfeld and this CIA briefer didn't think so. They carried on with their meeting. He was with this CIA briefer instead of going to the NMCC and taking charge. This CIA briefer is as guilty as Cheney and Rumsfeld, and if identified would be someone who could implicate his bosses in exchange for sparing his worthless disgusting life.