"Little evidence of health benefits from organic foods, Stanford study finds"~SU

[SUPREMEMASTER]

Little evidence of health benefits from organic foods, Stanford study finds

http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2012/september/organic.html (Click Here)

SEPT. 3, 2012

BY MICHELLE BRANDT

You’re in the supermarket eyeing a basket of sweet, juicy plums. You reach for the conventionally grown stone fruit, then decide to spring the extra $1/pound for its organic cousin. You figure you’ve just made the healthier decision by choosing the organic product — but new findings from Stanford University cast some doubt on your thinking.


“There isn’t much difference between organic and conventional foods, if you’re an adult and making a decision based solely on your health,” said Dena Bravata (Click Here), MD, MS, the senior author of a paper comparing the nutrition of organic and non-organic foods, published in the Sept. 4 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine.


A team led by Bravata, a senior affiliate with Stanford’s Center for Health Policy (Click Here), and Crystal Smith-Spangler (Click Here), MD, MS, an instructor in the school’s Division of General Medical Disciplines and a physician-investigator at VA Palo Alto Health Care System (Click Here), did the most comprehensive meta-analysis to date of existing studies comparing organic and conventional foods. They did not find strong evidence that organic foods are more nutritious or carry fewer health risks than conventional alternatives, though consumption of organic foods can reduce the risk of pesticide exposure.


The popularity of organic products, which are generally grown without synthetic pesticides or fertilizers or routine use of antibiotics or growth hormones, is skyrocketing in the United States. Between 1997 and 2011, U.S. sales of organic foods increased from $3.6 billion to $24.4 billion, and many consumers are willing to pay a premium for these products. Organic foods are often twice as expensive as their conventionally grown counterparts.

Click this link to continue reading this news article: http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2012/september/organic.html (Click Here)

They lied by omitting:

• 1. Genetically modified food begins to ruin fertility and the ability to reproduce properly over a multigenerational period of time.
• 2. Genetically modified food contains lesser levels of neutrients and vitamins.
• 3. Genetically modified food has caused mass death to animals that were fed it.
• 4. Genetically modified organisms inject DNA into intestinal bacteria (Click Here) which can have negative health effects on the one consuming the genetically modified food.

Does anyone else have anything to add to this list of deliberately omitted facts?

9. [Effective 7-22-2010] Entire Mainstream Media articles will not be allowed to be reproduced in posts. Please only post the relevant information for the post entry (max of a few paragraphs, 3-4 and a link to the original source) and your comments regarding the specific information that you wish to comment on. If entire articles are reproduced, moderators will truncate them. Members who continue this practice will be banned.

I was sitting infront of my HDTV and was looking at digital channels that I didn't normally get with a normal TV, and flipped on the BBC, and was just watching them to see what propaganda they were pushing this time... Then I saw that new news about organic food scroll accross the bottom of the screen on their news ticker -- so I immediately decided to Google it and post about this obviously malicious disinformation-based deception in order to expose it.

This proves that there is a war all about controlling minds, and the "INFOWAR", as the military calls it, exists.

[EyesOpenWider]

Guess I've got to rethink my definition of "conventional"...

[Satyagraha]

They would advocate that you inject high fructose corn syrup directly into your veins, followed up with an MSG chaser.

[EvadingGrid]

Absolute bollocks

Just think of the Radioactive Polonium, yea the stuff that killed Alexander Litvinenko that is contained in our FOOD.

It comes from CHEMICAL FARMING....

Radioactive Polonium-210 contained in phosphate fertilizers is absorbed by the roots of plants, which is why Tobbacco gives you lung cancer... and they have known this since the 1960's... but hey, nothing to see folks, move along...


Phosphate Fertilizers ---> Radioactive Polonium-210 -----> Plants -----> Humans

[SUPREMEMASTER]

http://www.infowarsshop.com/Genetic-Roulette-The-Gamble-Of-Our-Lives_p_721.html





You notice how this DVD just came out THIS September and this P.R. campaign just pops out of the woodwork right before the DVD's release?

I bet they did that on purpose to basically counter the DVD before anyone sees it, and to cause everyone to have a type of "unwillingness" to watch the DVD/video documentary as it begins to virally spread around. (Stopping it from going viral in the first place)

Giving the documentary a "bad first impression" before anyone ever comes into contact with the DVD.

I bet they also knew the "behind the scenes" informatiion about the DVD's release date ahead of time, because they monitor everything -- and that's how they knew when to do this.

[SUPREMEMASTER]

Monsanto Apologists Attempt to Spin Shocking GMO Study

http://www.infowars.com/monsanto-apologists-attempt-to-spin-shocking-gmo-study/ (Click Here)

Establishment trots out “experts” in desperate bid to debunk fact that genetically-engineered food is a threat to humanity

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
September 21, 2012

A shocking new study conducted by French scientists which shows that rats fed on Monsanto’s genetically modified corn suffered cancer and premature death has been met with a furious response from GMO apologists, who are desperately trying to cast doubt on the the study in an effort to discredit its findings.



50 percent of male and 70 percent of female rats fed on a diet containing NK603 – a genetically modified corn produced by Monsanto – or those exposed to Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller – suffered tumors and multiple organ damage, causing them to die prematurely, the study found. (Click Here)

The study was conducted by French scientists at the University of Caen and published in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology.
 
Almost immediately after the findings were made public at a press conference in London, numerous other scientists rushed to Monsanto’s defense and claimed that the study was inaccurate.
 
“This strain of rat is very prone to mammary tumors particularly when food intake is not restricted,” said Tom Sanders, head of the nutritional sciences research division at King’s College London. “The statistical methods are unconventional … and it would appear the authors have gone on a statistical fishing trip.”
 
However, the statistical methods are perfectly straightforward. Only 30 percent of males and 20 percent of females in the control group of rats that were not exposed to Monsanto’s products died prematurely – meaning males were 30 per cent more likely to die prematurely after eating Monsanto corn and females a whopping 50 per cent more likely to die.

Sanders’ point about that particular breed of rat being prone to tumors treats the study as if it was conducted without using a control group of rats as a comparison, which is completely untrue.
 
David Spiegelhalter of the University of Cambridge also tried to cast doubt (Click Here) on the accuracy of the study by highlighting that “The study’s untreated control arm comprised only 10 rats of each sex, most of which also got tumors.”

Monsanto continually points to studies they claim confirm the safety of GMO food, and did so again in the aftermath of the latest French study. However, all of those studies did not go beyond the 90 day reporting period unlike the Caen study which tracked the health of the rats throughout their life span. It was only after four months that the tumors and organ damage suffered by the rats became evident.
 
Monsanto is already very much on the ropes in Europe and faces being kicked out of the European marketplace altogether if its reputation continues to be denigrated – that’s presumably why a gaggle of “experts” have been trotted out by the establishment Universities – a lot of which routinely receive huge grants from Monsanto itself (Click Here) – in order to desperately try and debunk the study.

Meanwhile over in the United States, Monsanto and other GMO corporations have spent a combined sum of over $19 million dollars (Click Here) in an attempt to shoot down Proposition 37, the California bill that merely seeks to require genetically-modified foods and food ingredients to be labeled at the retail level.

If Monsanto and other GMO producers like DuPont, Bayer, Dow, BASF, and Syngenta are so confident that their genetically-engineered products are safe – why have they spent so much money attempting to prevent the public from knowing that they are in the food supply?
 
As Mike Adams points out, (Click Here) no matter how many apologists the establishment wheels out to cover-up for the fact that GMO represents an unparalleled environmental threat to humankind – the cat is already out of the bag.

“The era of GMO deception is history. A food revolution is upon us. And if governments will not halt the mass poisoning of our world by evil corporations, I have no doubt that the People will, by themselves, eventually invoke other necessary methods of halting this great evil,” he writes.

[EvadingGrid]

Every year the European Union pays an ever increasing fine because officially it blocks and bans GM.

[jofortruth]

When you have peabrains doing studies like this, of course they will come out with this result! THEY ARE MINIONS!

Also, Big Agra or TPTB have been buying up some ORGANIC companies, so that's probably the food they studied which has been contaminated. Thus, not a legitimate study to begin with.

Now, you go to a real Organic company who has principle and is there to actually serve the public, and you will find a healthy product.

Don't listen to peabrains who promote establishment lies with illegitimate studies, listen to GOOD AND REAL AMERICANS who serve the public with a real product.

Another tip: Anything coming out of Stanford should be questioned PERIOD! Apparently only MINION TYPES work there it seems! I would take a real professional over these lowlifes any day!


 

[jofortruth]

http://www.infowarsshop.com/Genetic-Roulette-The-Gamble-Of-Our-Lives_p_721.html





I bet they did that on purpose to basically counter the DVD before anyone sees it, and to cause everyone to have a type of "unwillingness" to watch the DVD/video documentary as it begins to virally spread around. (Stopping it from going viral in the first place)

BINGO! That's how deceptive minions operate on behalf of their masters! THIS IS THEIR M.O.!

[SUPREMEMASTER]

BINGO! That's how deceptive minions operate on behalf of their masters! THIS IS THEIR M.O.!

I even saw the documentary when they put it on the web for a week of free viewing--

http://geneticroulettemovie.com/

NOONE should take the existence of the Internet and the fact that anyone can just go to that website and watch the whole thing FREE for granted.

http://www.infowars.com/cybersecurity-executive-order-almost-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-3411827

That's why I wrote this comment:



I hope he sees it by a miracle.

[donnay]

They would advocate that you inject high fructose corn syrup directly into your veins, followed up with an MSG chaser.

Along with your mercury, aluminum and Formaldehyde.  And let's not forget to drink up your sodium fluoride.  Sickening.