|
orangeblue
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #400 on: June 07, 2009, 08:49:03 AM » |
|
 Very obvious scalar influence on the high clouds this morning. There’s been substantial rain in Florida for the past few days with a wierd spinning weather system parked overhead. I’ve only seen minor chemtrailing recently through the clouds. Those few trails looked like they were being used for judging position and movement of the system, rather than heavy chemical weather modification. But of course they could be spraying on top of the rain clouds and it couldn't be seen. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orangeblue
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #401 on: June 08, 2009, 07:12:03 AM » |
|
 All these pics were taken about twelve hours after the one above. A few minutes before these were snapped, the sky had a thick, gray cloud cover. It even looked like it might rain some more. However, I heard a couple of planes pass above the clouds and almost immediately some patches of blue began appearing. Within a few minutes there was a gigantic blue swath in the sky where the cloud cover had been completely erased. This happened so fast and over such a large area that I missed capturing much of it when I walked inside just to change the camera battery. But you can still see in the pics where it looks like the clouds are almost “boiling” away because of the chemical spraying. They weren't using the white barium and aluminum trails to do this, but something like Dyn-o-gel that immediately sucks huge amounts of moisture out of the air. You can read the patent about this chemical here: http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Chemtrails/DynoPatent.html This is the patent's abstract: "A method for artificially modifying the weather by seeding rain clouds of a storm with suitable cross-linked aqueous polymer. The polymer is dispersed into the cloud and the wind of the storm agitates the mixture causing the polymer to absorb the rain. This reaction forms a gelatinous substance which precipitate to the surface below. Thus, diminishing the clouds ability to rain."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Brocke
Eleutherophiliac & Drapetomaniac
Global Moderator
Member
   
Offline
Posts: 9,403
I am not a number, I am a free man!
|
 |
« Reply #402 on: June 20, 2009, 07:34:03 AM » |
|
Chemtrail over Bendigo (central Victoria) Australiahttp://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/news/watch/v18647500jJwdSNzrI took this on 31/05/09
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history. ~Aldous Huxley
|
|
|
|
planning4acrash
|
 |
« Reply #403 on: June 21, 2009, 02:45:14 AM » |
|
It seems that Aussies are blessed with less chemtrails than us. We get those everyday in London, entire days when the sun is hazed out by a chem-fog.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orangeblue
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #404 on: July 05, 2009, 08:36:59 PM » |
|
  One wide and one close up of HAARP/scalar rippled clouds taken by looking up at the sky today. Pics were desaturated and contrast enhanced to show the waves more clearly. Some of the most dramatic energy patterns in the clouds I’ve ever seen.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Galt
|
 |
« Reply #406 on: July 19, 2009, 05:01:23 PM » |
|
I just found this article on Wired, having to do with "noctilucent clouds". I find it interesting to compare and contrast these with chemtrail as well as HAARP activity, and wonder if/how they may all be related. Mysterious Glowing Clouds Appear Across America's Night SkiesBy Alexis Madrigal, July 16 2009 http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/07/nightclouds/ The sky over Omaha on July 14th, snapped by Mike Hollingshead at Extreme Instability Mysterious, glowing clouds previously seen almost exclusively in Earth’s polar regions have appeared in the skies over the United States and Europe over the past several days. Photographers and other sky watchers in Omaha, Paris, Seattle, and other locations have run outside to capture images of what scientists call noctilucent (”night shining”) clouds. Formed by ice literally at the boundary where the earth’s atmosphere meets space 50 miles up, they shine because they are so high that they remain lit by the sun even after our star is below the horizon. The clouds might be beautiful, but they could portend global changes caused by global warming. Noctilucent clouds are a fundamentally new phenomenon in the temperate mid-latitude sky, and it’s not clear why they’ve migrated down from the poles. Or why, over the last 25 years, more of them are appearing in the polar regions, too, and shining more brightly. “That’s a real concern and question,” said James Russell, an atmospheric scientist at Hampton University and the principal investigator of an ongoing NASA satellite mission to study the clouds. “Why are they getting more numerous? Why are they getting brighter? Why are they appearing at lower latitudes?” Nobody knows for sure, but most of the answers seem to point to human-caused global atmospheric change. Noctilucent clouds lit up the Paris sky behind the Bastille Day fireworks show at the Eiffel Tower. Captured by flickr user, breff Noctilucent clouds were first observed in 1885 by an amateur astronomer. No observations of anything resembling noctilucent clouds before that time has ever been found. There is no lack of observations of other phenomena in the sky, so atmospheric scientists are fairly sure that the phenomenon is recent, although they are not sure why. Over the last 125 years, scientists have learned how the clouds form. At temperatures around minus 230 degrees Fahrenheit, dust blowing up from below or falling into the atmosphere from space provides a resting spot for water vapor to condense and freeze. Right now, during the northern hemisphere’s summer, the atmosphere is heating up and expanding. At the outside edge of the atmosphere, that actually means that it’s getting colder because it’s pushed farther out into space. It’s not hard to see how a warming Earth could change those dynamics: as the globe heats up, the top of the atmosphere should get colder. “The prevailing theory and most plausible explanation is that CO2 buildup, at 50 miles above the surface, would cause the temperature decrease,” Russell said. He cautioned, however, that temperature observations remain inconclusive. The global changes that appear to be reshaping noctilucent cloud distribution could be much more complex, said Vincent Wickwar, an atmospheric scientist at Utah State University whose team was first to report a mid-latitude noctilucent cloud in 2002. Temperature does not explain their observations from around 42 degrees latitude. “To get the noctilucent clouds you need temperatures that are about 20 degrees Kelvin colder than what we see on average up there,” Wickwar said. “We may have effects from CO2 or methane but it would only be a degree or a fraction of a degree.” Instead, Wickwar’s explanation is that a vertical atmospheric wave discovered in their LIDAR data lowered the temperature in the region above their radar installation near Logan, Utah. But then you have to ask, he noted, “Where’d the wave come from?” They don’t really have an answer yet. Other facilities around the world with similar LIDAR capacity haven’t reported similar waves. And the Rocky Mountains, near Wickwar’s lab, can cause atmospheric waves, which could be a special feature of his location. Other theories abound to explain the observed changes in the clouds. Human-caused increases in atmospheric methane, which oxidizes into carbon dioxide and water vapor, could be providing more water for ice in the stratosphere. Increases in the amount of cosmic or terrestrial dust in the stratosphere could also increase the number of brightly shining clouds. A rendering of the noctilucent clouds created from data obtained by Russel’s NASA project, AIM. Two years into Russell’s NASA project, more questions exist than firm answers. They will have at least three and a half more years, though, to gather good data on upper atmospheric dynamics. The recent observations of noctilucent clouds at all kinds of latitudes provide an extra impetus to understand what is going on up there. Changes are occurring faster than scientists can understand their causes. “I suspect, as many of us feel, that it is global change, but I fear we don’t understand it,” Wickwar said. “It’s not as simple as a temperature change.” Three minute NASA video, "Glowing Clouds Filmed from Space Station":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaI8JyAqykQ
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orangeblue
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #407 on: July 23, 2009, 11:52:24 AM » |
|
  Two pics showing morning and afternoon chemtrailing today. In the second pic you can see the obvious differences between a normal fluffy water vapor cloud and the artificial barium/aluminum sprayed chemtrails.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phasma
|
 |
« Reply #408 on: July 25, 2009, 05:13:05 AM » |
|
Great Pics - the sky here yesterday was weird - looked like someone had graffiti1d the entire sky, normal clouds, chem clouds, weird dark low clouds . . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra
|
|
|
|
Mike Philbin
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #409 on: July 26, 2009, 05:05:33 AM » |
|
the sky here in Oxford no longer supports CHEMTRAILS... I don't know what's happened since Spring but there's been an enormous downturn in chemtrail activity. And I'm up early, so I should know. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phasma
|
 |
« Reply #410 on: July 26, 2009, 05:22:32 AM » |
|
the sky here in Oxford no longer supports CHEMTRAILS... I don't know what's happened since Spring but there's been an enormous downturn in chemtrail activity. And I'm up early, so I should know.  Same here - there is much less spraying. But there is still some! I see them later in the day - which begs the question as to how this can be anything to do with reducing global warming when they are spraying so late in the day - after the sun has done its worst?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra
|
|
|
|
yrpplmean
|
 |
« Reply #411 on: July 26, 2009, 07:25:34 AM » |
|
I don't know much about chemtrails except what I have read here. Now, let me get this straight, contrails and chemtrails differ in texturic figurations and color.
I also looked up online and it says that many people dispute the fact that they (chemtrails) even exist. I find that hard to believe. Now they are coming up with startling discoveries and findings that are bewildering the scientists (atmospheric). So how can they disprove that they don't exist when they can't even figure out what is there?
Another cover up conspiracy cancellation in progress?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson Holly
|
 |
« Reply #413 on: July 26, 2009, 08:35:36 AM » |
|
CHEMTRAIL PATENTSNASA Patent for using 'rocket motors':~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ROCKET HAVING BARIUM RELEASE SYSTEM TO CREATE ION CLOUDS IN THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE United States Patent: - US3813875 / Issued/Filed Dates: June 4, 1974 / April 28, 1972 http://www.scribd.com/doc/2056251/US-PATENT-by-NASA-Chemtrails-relatedA chemical system for releasing a good yield of free barium (Ba°) atoms and barium ions (BA+) to create ion clouds in the upper atmosphere and interplanetary space for the study of the geophysical properties of the medium. Inventor(s): Paine; Thomas O. Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration with respect to an invention of , Hampton, VA 23364 NASA: BARIUM - Chemical Formulas/Supplierssource: gisgaia ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is the "Description of Preferred Embodiments" link in the NASA Barium Patent listed above. Astounding that this information was generated in l969 and now,30 years later, there is evidence of Barium saturation in our atmosphere. The Barium/Fuel mixtures are listed below along with the suppliers. Description of Preferred Embodiments: Referring now to the drawings and more particularly to FIG. 1, there is shown a segment of a suitable carrier vehicle 10, such for example a rocket motor. Vehicle 10 is employed to carry fuel tank 11, insulated oxidizer tank 13 and combustion chamber 15, along with the necessary instrumentation, from earth into the upper atmosphere or into interplanetary space. Fuel tank 11 is in fluid connection with combustion chamber 15 and oxidizer tank 13 is in fluid connection with combustion chamber 15 by way of respective conduits 17 and 19. A pair of valves 21 and 23 are disposed within the respective conduits 17 and 19. Valves 21 and 23 are adapted to be selectively and simultaneously opened by a suitable battery-powered timing mechanism, radio signal, or the like, to release the pressurized fuel and oxidizer from tanks 11 and 13. The fuel and oxidizer then flow through conduits 17 and 19 and impinge upon each other through a centrally positioned manifold and suitable jets (not shown) in combustion chamber 15 where spontaneous ignition occurs. The reaction products are then expelled through the open ends of combustion chamber 15 as plasma which includes the desired barium neutral atoms and barium ions as individual species. The fuel utilized in fuel tank 11 is either hydrazine (N2 H4) or liquid ammonia (NH3) while the oxidizer employed is selected from the group consisting of liquid fluorine (F2), chlorine trifluoride (ClF3) and oxygen difluoride (OF2). When using hydrazine as the fuel, barium may be dissolved therein as barium chloride, BaCl2, or barium nitrate, Ba(NO3)2, or a combination of the two. When using liquid ammonia as the fuel, barium metal may be dissolved therein. The combination found to produce the highest intensity of Ba° and Ba+ resonance radiation in ground based tests involved a fuel of 16 percent Ba(NO3)2, 17 percent BaCl2 and 67 percent N2 H4 ; and as the oxidizer, the cryogenic liquid fluorine F2 and in which an oxidizer to fuel weight ratio was 1.32. More here ~ MUST SEE:http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/patents.html~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/Phelps_on_Chemtrails.pdfhttp://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Chemtrails/Hughes.htmlhttp://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/health_risks/chemtrail_crisis.html
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kushfiend
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #415 on: July 26, 2009, 08:57:31 AM » |
|
Damn, and everyone at home calls me crazy.  I remember when I first spotted chemtrails, some 5 or 6 years ago, over my city. I knew something was up, I could just tell that they weren't spraying typical exhaust, the streaks of white would just sit in the sky for hours. I knew then we were being sprayed, it kind of sucks that it's pretty much confirmed by these patents now. I was hoping I would be wrong. I knew I wasn't though. This is some insidious shit
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson Holly
|
 |
« Reply #416 on: July 26, 2009, 09:24:42 AM » |
|
CHEMTRAIL PATENTS ~ MORE~~~~~~~ Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and methodUnited States Patent 6412416EXCERPTS:Disclosed is an aerosol generating device comprising a cartridge containing a propellant. When ignited, propellant gases expand through a diffuser, then through and into a clearing pad and then through and into a filler area, thereby de-agglomerating and fluidizing the filler and increasing pressure until a frangible end seal on the retainer end of the cartridge ruptures and releases the filler as an aerosol cloud. Methods for disseminating an aerosol and for using the device are also disclosed. ~~~~~~~> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6412416.htmlGOVERNMENT INTERESTThe invention described herein may be manufactured, licensed, and used by or for the U.S. Government. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to devices and methods for aerosol dispersion. More particularly, the claimed devices and methods use propellant gas generation. Most particularly, the devices and methods provide a non-explosive means for propellant disseminated aerosol payloads for military and civilian purposes. 2. Brief Description of the Related Art Aerosols are the suspension of solid or liquid particles in the atmosphere. Aerosols are used in the military to defensively position and protect combat forces. During operations, a military force may be targeted visually or by means of ultraviolet, infrared (IR) or millimeter (MM) wave radar sensors. To counter this targeting, various types of filler payloads are used for aerosol dissemination, thereby obscuring and protecting the potential targets. These payloads include smokes to prevent visual detection, brass flakes that interfere with IR tracking and carbon fiber payloads to block energy in the MM region of the electromagnetic spectrum. ~~~~~~~ SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention includes a device comprising at least one cartridge formed by a casing having a base end and a retainer end; a firing initiator mounted in the base end and extending to a propellant near the base end of the casing; a diffuser inside the casing and on a side of the propellant opposite the base end; a clearing pad adjacent to the diffuser on a side of the diffuser opposite the base end; a filler area inside the casing and adjacent to the clearing pad on a side of the clearing pad opposite the base end, the filler area containing filler capable of forming an aerosol; and a frangible end seal in the retainer end of the casing. Preferably, the propellant's rate of reaction is slower than that of an explosive that generates a shock wave traveling at 2000 meters per second. More preferably, the propellant is a double-base propellant. A double-base propellant contains two active ingredients, generally nitrocellulose and nitroglycerine. ~~~~~~~ The invention also encompasses various methods. One preferred method of use involves daisy chaining a plurality of the devices together in a master-slave network to achieve long and continuous aerosol clouds. Another preferred method of use is as a vehicle self-protection screening device. Another is as a crowd control device.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
John Galt
|
 |
« Reply #417 on: July 26, 2009, 02:55:24 PM » |
|
the sky here in Oxford no longer supports CHEMTRAILS... I don't know what's happened since Spring but there's been an enormous downturn in chemtrail activity. And I'm up early, so I should know.  1) There's been an enormous downturn in chemtrail activity here in San Francisco as well, and I too pay very close attention. Maybe 1-2 days in the last couple months is all. Not sure what's up, or in this case what's not up. 2) Anyone else watch yesterday's "That's Impossible" episode on the History Channel that had to do with weather manipulation? Chemtrails were downplayed, while HAARP and military applications of weather manipulation were the focus. View it online here: Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVNNqLQivuoPart 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJqsHZmBVjgPart 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLTOmGpasDUStill awaiting part 4, 5... to be uploaded.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yrpplmean
|
 |
« Reply #418 on: July 27, 2009, 03:41:46 AM » |
|
That show is fabulous! Simply love it! I seriously think though that no one can control lightning, but just how to trigger its usage is the key to weather warfare! The "Elite" will use anything they can find, dig up anything the can, study anything that has possibilities to be able to control the entire earth and atmosphere! They are trying to play God. That will fail ultimately. Imagine using weather and triggering nature for war. That is a scary thing to fathom. Russia, man you gotta give them credit lol No wonder our government was so jealous! HAARP is the largest radio station not made for human ears. All those antennas used as one gigantic antenna! HAARP is indeed heating up the atmosphere and changing the weather conditions. You move the ionosphere and then the jet streams move right along with it. All major places on the globe OWN these HAARP "research facilities". Commanded "Air Space" and the normal airplanes are directed not to enter into it! Chemical weather warfare causes droughts, rains, freaks of nature but that nature is controlled nonetheless either through experiments or on purpose! Project Popeye-Operation Popeye! "Make Mud Not War" = Weather Warfare I am now a complete believer in this Weather Warfare.hmm that dome they used or have used since hurricane Katrina is new isn't it? Here are the other uploads John Galt  Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOyYwC7lqBAPart 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lqj_CmVu0vcPart 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNn1qnZsazw
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Philbin
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #419 on: July 28, 2009, 12:07:52 AM » |
|
No, I spoke too soon. TODAY OXFORD IS BOMBARDED with chemtrails sky was clear this morning 6am, then the long contrails that don't go away arrives NW to SE and W to E in multiple waves, now the sky is powdery-overcast, and they're still chemsprays BEHIND that lot. WHY, JESUS, WHY?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
John Galt
|
 |
« Reply #420 on: July 28, 2009, 12:12:45 AM » |
|
No, I spoke too soon. TODAY OXFORD IS BOMBARDED with chemtrails sky was clear this morning 6am, then the long contrails that don't go away arrives NW to SE and W to E in multiple waves, now the sky is powdery-overcast, and they're still chemsprays BEHIND that lot. WHY, JESUS, WHY? I wish I had answers for you Mike. I've noticed that bombardments you've experienced there in Oxford (ones that you post about) often coincide with bombardments here in San Francisco. I'll be checking the skies first thing in the am, 6-7 hours from now, to see what I see and with camera at the ready.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Philbin
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #421 on: July 28, 2009, 12:25:09 AM » |
|
thanks John,
I neglected to mention that the W to E chemtrails (contrails that don't go away) are PARTICULARLY long, wide (and widening) and powdery ... there's now also some S to N ones and some N to S ones ... a proper long-lasting intentional bombardment...
wonder how this ties in with people's reporting of novel virus (we had the vaccine two years ago) A-H1N1?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phasma
|
 |
« Reply #422 on: July 28, 2009, 02:25:34 AM » |
|
Same here - sky is that milky white colour. They gettin up earlier these days and spraying before first light here. I wonder just how many planes are doing this? The numbers involved must mean (assuming these are not civilian planes) That there is a big base somewhere where all these things get loaded and take off from. Or they could just be doing it right infront of our faces from normal airports? Crazy stuff. Wonder why our summers are chilly and wet
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra
|
|
|
|
yrpplmean
|
 |
« Reply #423 on: July 28, 2009, 04:16:02 AM » |
|
It is really strange and scary seeing all these photos! I really never paid much attention to the skies/clouds before, but now, I can see the differences big time! I used to see the clouds as beauty, (well, the original ones still are), but now, I can tell the difference between the contrails and the chemtrails and can spot them, show them and now discuss them to people thanks to this thread and all those who put the info here!! I really hate what they are doing and I just don't understand why they want to hurt and monopolize every bit of earth and atmosphere to their own advantage. I never thought people could be so evil. Guess the bottom line is, evil is evil and evil will use its evilness to do more evil.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
John Galt
|
 |
« Reply #424 on: July 28, 2009, 04:20:50 AM » |
|
Guess the bottom line is, evil is evil and evil will use its evilness to do more evil.
Young dude, you made me log back in to post a quick comment in reply to your post. You say "evil is evil and evil will use its evilness to do more evil." Well, you want to leave it at that? You want older folk like me to help you revise? Is that all she says? I know there's more. Together, why don't we try and reach for it, and f**k this New World Order, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yrpplmean
|
 |
« Reply #425 on: July 28, 2009, 04:35:53 AM » |
|
lol hear hear! but I am not that young  born in 65 I would love to put them where the sun doesn't shine-preferably on the outer realms of Pluto and the universe. I am just one person and still am trying to convince my relatives! Any ideas on how to do this? Stubborn people are stubborn and how to break through that stubbornness is beyond me! I can deal with children, but those set in their ways are another story all together! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TheCaliKid
|
 |
« Reply #426 on: July 28, 2009, 03:32:59 PM » |
|
1) There's been an enormous downturn in chemtrail activity here in San Francisco as well, and I too pay very close attention. Maybe 1-2 days in the last couple months is all. Not sure what's up, or in this case what's not up. It's because we are not in our rainy season. Typical California rainy season is October - April, and this is when you will see heavy activity. During the summer months, you don't see that much.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Better to beg for forgiveness, than to ask for permission
|
|
|
|
John Galt
|
 |
« Reply #427 on: July 28, 2009, 04:18:28 PM » |
|
It's because we are not in our rainy season. Typical California rainy season is October - April, and this is when you will see heavy activity.
During the summer months, you don't see that much.
You DO see a lot of fog though, on the coast and over San Francisco. It was there when I woke today, and remains there now. Earlier I took a run to Lands End (north of Ocean Beach), and from there could see the constant stream of fog barrel through the Golden Gate Bridge and into the Bay Area. I wonder if there is something besides water vapor in that fog... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yrpplmean
|
 |
« Reply #428 on: July 29, 2009, 12:46:50 AM » |
|
Don't go and see the movie "The Mist" lool  just kiddin
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
John Galt
|
 |
« Reply #429 on: July 29, 2009, 01:00:50 AM » |
|
Don't go and see the movie "The Mist" lool  just kiddin Or John carpenter's classic, "The Fog" (the original version)  You know, it would be really easy to get a sample of what's in the fog that rolls into the Bay Area. As it appeared to me today from the vantage point I took (5 miles south and at the westernmost point on the coast that still had a clear view of the bridge), when there is a strong stream of fog pouring into the Bay Area like today, the fog hits the Golden Gate Bridge head on. All's a person needs to do is gain access (still free) to the western pathway on the bridge and go to the midpoint in the span and face west. It's bike only, but you can stop for a short-time no problem. ~jg
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yrpplmean
|
 |
« Reply #430 on: July 29, 2009, 01:20:01 AM » |
|
How would they take the samples?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
John Galt
|
 |
« Reply #431 on: July 29, 2009, 01:23:42 AM » |
|
I don't know really. Not my field of expertise. Maybe they open a clean and sterile empty 'jam' jar, face west, and capture the fog as it hits them head on and traveling 30+ mph? They just need to close the lid quickly, right 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
John Galt
|
 |
« Reply #432 on: July 29, 2009, 01:34:04 AM » |
|
You know what would be really neat? If we all owned portable and easy to carry travel size digital air quality testers on our persons. It could test for all measurable toxins and poisons known to science to measure the air quality in any environment, from a closed indoor space to a larger space like standing on the Golden Gate Bridge and testing the fog that hits you in the face as it travels inward to 'infect' the enitre Bay Area and other inland valleys.
I would also like to have this available for testing air quality around me following chemtrail attacks.
We need to find this solution, I think.
~jg
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yrpplmean
|
 |
« Reply #433 on: July 29, 2009, 02:05:38 AM » |
|
hmmm wonder if CSI could get involved lol let the fog get on us and let them take samples lol
air tight containers and it isn't my field of expertise either lol but sorta reminds me of that kiddie movie "Monster Inc." - where they need the screams in this tight container to control their energy levels, electricity etc. lol n how they got the screams in that tight container it doesn't say lol
I wonder if it really can be done
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NinjaGaijin
|
 |
« Reply #434 on: August 14, 2009, 01:30:52 AM » |
|
Chemtrails probably help speed up climate changes too. Definitely partly to do with HAARP and weather warfare, not just killing us with disease.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
myspace.com/djninjagaijin / toxemiarecords.com / toxemiarecords.999.org
|
|
|
|
planning4acrash
|
 |
« Reply #435 on: August 15, 2009, 04:22:21 PM » |
|
Chemtrails probably help speed up climate changes too. Definitely partly to do with HAARP and weather warfare, not just killing us with disease.
Man made climate change is nonsense, see my blogpost on it, they, most likely are trying to mask recent cooling in the weather, as part of what they are doing, but the smoking gun, is that they say we must not have farting cows to save the environment, whilst they spray the earth with cadmium, barium and goodness knows what else: Is Global Warming for real? http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=7183
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orangeblue
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #436 on: August 17, 2009, 03:51:36 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aviana
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #437 on: August 17, 2009, 05:49:28 PM » |
|
There's a new show on called "Pawn Stars", on History - I think - anyway, it's quite interesting if you're interested in antiques and collectibles - including military items. There is a picture that they flash on the show showing the three guys standing in front of the shop. In the background of the picture is a clear chemtrail cross in the sky. It only flashes for a second, but it's there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HighSea
|
 |
« Reply #438 on: August 21, 2009, 02:19:24 PM » |
|
Has anyone else seen the chemtrails on Google Maps when you view from the street? I saw many when I searched Manchester United's Old Trafford stadium. Eeerie! http://maps.google.co.uk/help/maps/streetview/
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aviana
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #439 on: August 21, 2009, 05:22:35 PM » |
|
Wow - had not thought of that. Just spent a few mins looking around Houston on street view. Chemtrails everywhere. This is a superb source of reference material. Thank you HighSea - this is huge!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|