PrisonPlanet Forum
May 25, 2013, 05:21:26 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The United States Is Not a Government. It Is a Corporation  (Read 2359 times)
KD7ONE
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 531



WWW
« on: June 22, 2012, 07:31:13 PM »


The problem with politics is that 99.9% of the people still think the Senators and Represenatives are accountable to the people. They were until 1871. In 1871, the country went from a government to a corporation.
 
The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.
 
What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let's look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated "front" for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.
 
The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.
 
In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:
"The Constitution for the united states of America".
The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.
 
Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment.
 
Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me — and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the "organic" Constitution, we now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a "privilege" which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution.
 
So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word "Sovereign," we must think about what the word means.
 
According to Webster's Dictionary, "sovereign" is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.
 
In other words, our government was created by and for "sovereigns" — the free citizens who were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be sovereign — remember that. Government cannot be sovereign. We can also look to the Declaration of Independence, where we read: "government is subject to the consent of the governed" — that's supposed to be us, the sovereigns. Do you feel like a sovereign nowadays? I don't.
 
It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that this is not what is happening in our country today. Government in these times is NOT subject to the consent of the governed. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia — encroaching into every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia. THEY just want you to think it does.
 
You see, you are presumed to know the law. This is ironic because as a people, we are taught basically nothing about the law in school. We are made to memorize obscure factoids and paragraphs here and there, such as the Preamble, and they gloss over the Bill of Rights. But we are not told about the law. Nor do our corporate government schools delve into the Constitution in any great depth. After all, they were put into place to indoctrinate and dumb down the masses — not to teach us anything. We were not told that we were sold-out to foreign interests and made beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress to the international bankers. For generations, American citizens have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay on a massive debt that they, as a People, did not incur. There are many, many things the People have not been told. How do you feel about being made a beneficiary of somebody else's massive debt without your knowledge or consent? Are we gonna keep going along with this??
 
When you hear some individuals say that the Constitution is null and void, think about how our government has transformed over time from a municipal or service-oriented entity to a corporate or profit-oriented entity. We are living under the myth that this is lawful, but it is not. We are being ruled by a "de facto," or unlawful, form of government — the corporate body of the death-mongers — The Controllers.
 
With the passage of the Act of 1871, a series of subtle and overt deceptions were set in motion — all in conjunction and collusion with the Congress, who knowingly and deliberately sold the People down the river. Did they tell you this in government school? I doubt it. They were too busy drumming the fictional version of history into your brain — and mine. By failing to disclose what THEY did to the American People, the people became ignorant of what was happening. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin to the point of a knockdown. With the surrender of their gold in 1933, the People essentially surrendered their law. I don't suppose you were taught THAT in school either. That's because our REAL history is hidden from us. This is the way Roman Civil Law works — and our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law — better known as the "Divine Right of Kings" and "Law of the Seas", respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law.
 
The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the Constitutional Republic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union. The various arms of the corporation are known as "departments" such as the Judiciary, Justice and Treasury. You recognize those names? Yes, you do! But they are not what you assume them to be. These "departments" all belong to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. They do NOT belong to you and me under the corporate constitution and its various amendments that operate outside of the Constitutional Republic.
 
I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation [see http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002 ]. Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. I refer to this as the "corporate empire of the UNITED STATES," which operates under Roman Civil Law outside of the Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a cheesy, sleazy corporation? You'll ask your Congressperson about this, you say? HA!!
 
Congress is fully aware of this deception. You must be made aware that the members of Congress do NOT work for you and me. Rather, they work for the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Is this really any surprise to you? This is why we can't get them to do anything on our behalf or to answer to us — as in the case with the illegal income tax — among many other things. Contrary to popular belief, they are NOT our civil servants. They do NOT work for us. They are the servants of the corporate government and carry out its bidding. Period.
 
The great number of committees and sub-committees that the Congress has created all work together like a multi-headed monster to oversee the various corporate "departments." And, you should know that every single one of these that operates outside the District of Columbia is in violation of the law. The corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY state of the Republic beyond the District of Columbia. Let this sink into your brain for a minute. Ask yourself, "Could this deception REALLY have occurred without the full knowledge and complicity of the Congress?" Do you think it happened by accident? You are deceiving yourself if you do. There are no accidents or coincidences. It is time to confront the truth and awaken from ignorance.
 
Your legislators will not apprise you of this information. You are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the law, or your history for that matter, because this information has not been taught to you. No concerted effort has been made to inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of the facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to "give" you — at a price. Be wary of accepting so-called "benefits" of the corporation of the UNITED STATES. Aren't you enslaved enough already?
 
I said (above) that you are presumed to know the law. Still, it matters not if you don't in the eyes of the corporation. Ignorance of the law is not considered an excuse. It is your responsibility and your obligation as an American to learn about the law and how it applies to you. THEY count on the fact that most people are too uninterested or distracted or lazy to do so. The People have been mentally conditioned to allow the alleged government to do their thinking for them. We need to turn that around if we are to save our Republic before it is too late.
 
The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers. This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death. The corporate UNITED STATES also holds ownership of all your assets, your property, and even your children. Does this sound untrue? Think long and hard about all those bills you pay, all those various taxes and fines and licenses you must pay for. Yes, they've got you by the pockets. Actually, they've had you by the ass for as long as you've been alive. In your heart, you know it's true. Don't believe any of this? Read up on the 14th Amendment. Check out how "free" you really are.
 
With the Act of 1871 and subsequent legislation such as the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment, our once-great nation of Sovereigns has been subverted from a Republic to a democracy. As is the case under Roman Civil Law, our ignorance of the facts has led to our silence. Our silence has been construed as our consent to become beneficiaries of a debt we did not incur. The Sovereign People have been deceived for hundreds of years into thinking they remain free and independent, when in actuality we continue to be slaves and servants of the corporation.
 
Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. Nothing new there. Are we to forgive and justify this crime against the People? You have lost more freedom than you may realize due to corporate infiltration of the so-called government. We will lose more unless we turn away from a democracy that is the direct road to disaster — and restore our Constitutional Republic.
Logged

Giving frees us from the familiar territory of our own needs, while opening our minds to the unexplained worlds occupied by the needs of others.
pac522
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,562


Peace sells, but who's buying?


« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2012, 10:30:35 PM »

USA in Bankruptcy

Sometime in the mid 1800s, under Abraham Lincoln's administration, the States united installed the second version of the Federal Reserve System. Although it was a modified version, without profit for printing the money, it was still so evil an institution that the wheels where put in motion to close it down. When the then head of the fed found out about it he threatened congress with a depression is they should try. Congress responded nobility by arresting the extortionist and closing down the federal reserve.

In 1912 the new Fed was instigated by a new congress, probably bribed to silence and probably selected for office by the bankers. Almost no one was in congress when the fed bill passed and no serious arguments came to light after congress returned to Washington.  Now keep in mind that prohibition and women's rights and world war one had become big issues while the fed, the IRS and the League of Nations was getting established. When the time was ripe revenge was taken by the bankers for closing the earlier fed and the great depression ensued.

Prohibition did a great job at cultivating a criminal class and a bigger fed military/police presence known as the alcohol tobacco and firearms or ATF. Marijuana also helped in establishing the  FBI, etc..

But what stopped the great depression? Did it just run out of steam? No, it ended when the USA (corporation) filed for bankruptcy. Now with the bankruptcy came the war powers act. A provision of the constitution (thanks to the legal society) that basically gives the federal government a fictional authority over the states and the "citizens".

To this day, it is said that we are actually operating under this war powers declaration. All lawyers including judges have sworn an oath to keep this a secret. That is known as a conspiracy and an act of treason.

Now the constitution states that all powers not specifically granted to the Federal Government in the constitution belong to the States and or the Individuals. In other words the Federal Government can not acquire new authorities. So where does the AFT, FBI, National Parks, Bureau of Land Managements, etc. get it's lawful authority? It doesn't. These are criminal activities.But notice how some of them like the "National Parks" seem like good ideas. At best a steering community could have been establish to make recommendations to the states. From there a fund could be established across states for the preservation of the land. But a Fed authority over the state authority for the management of public property is a serious wrong. Note also that establishing a "national park" by state authority and which doesn't undermine the Common Law right of anyone is OK and a useful purpose of "government".

http://lawversuslegal.com/clarifications
Logged

This country did not achieve greatness with the mindset of "safety first" but rather "live free or die".

Truth is the currency of love. R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution!

We are all running on Gods laptop.
The problem is the virus called the Illuminati.  ~EvadingGrid

The answer to 1984 is 1776.
MonkeyPuppet
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,943


aut libertas aut mors


« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2012, 02:21:12 AM »


The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.
 

Let's take a look at the actual Act itself...


An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of the act.

Sec. 2.  And be it further enacted, That the executive power and authority in and over said District of Columbia shall be vested in a governor, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and who shall hold his office for four years, and until his successor shall be appointed and qualified.  The governor shall be a citizen of and shall have resided within said District twelve months before his appointment, and have the qualifications of an elector.  He may grant pardons and respites for offenses against the laws of said District enacted as aforesaid, and shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.

Sec. 3.  And be it further enacted, That every bill which shall have passed the council and house of delegates shall, before it becomes a law, be presented to the governor of the District of Columbia; if he approve, he shall sign it, but if not, he shall return it, with his objections, to the house in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the objections at large on their journal, and proceed to reconsider it.  If, after such reconsideration, two thirds of all the members appointed or elected to the house shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objections, to the other house, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of all the members appointed or elected to that house, it shall become a law.  But in all such cases the votes of both houses shall be determined by yeas and nays, and the names of the persons voting for and against the bill shall be entered on the journal of each house respectively.  If any bill shall not be returned by the governor within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the legislative assembly by their adjournment prevent its return, in which case it shall not be a law.



The Act continues through Section 41.

I'm not usually one to question the veracity of someone's claims regarding the nefarious deeds of the federal government.  After all, the government lies and lies all the time... even when the truth would serve it well.  However, this Act merely lays out the details of an incorporated municipal government much like the states of the union.  This is post-14th Amendment, after which many states, counties and cities began to incorporate... dawning the status of "person" under the law.  It is not surprising that the District would do the same thing (was it the first to do so?  I don't know, but it makes sense).

There is nothing in this Act that describes the characterization of the OP.  It did not create a corporation by the name of THE UNITED STATES.  In fact, if you read the Act, it states very clearly that it created a municipal corporation by the name of District of Columbia.

The Senate and House are still that of the originally-created federal government.  The Act creates an assembly that consists of a council and a house of delegates.  The only difference between the District and the states is that the District is always beholden to the federal Congress... since all legislative authority for the District of Columbia (geographically) is vested in the federal Congress.  Simplistically speaking, it is the other way around for the states.

The government of the District of Columbia (created by this Act) has absolutely no legislative or executive power with regard to the states.  It is not the same government body as the federal government.
Logged


Income Tax: Shattering The Myths
w w w . original intent . o r g

The 1911 in .45 ACP... don't leave home without it!  Safety first!!
KD7ONE
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 531



WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2012, 05:49:40 AM »

Governments on all levels within this country are corporations. Go to http://www.manta.com and look for your Mayor, County Commissionor, Governor, and Prime Minister of the US.

Did he say Prime Minister?

I think he did.

Why would say that?

Because this country is still a territory of Great Britian.

Oh yeah? PROVE IT!

OK. Go to http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/about/history.html
About 2/3 of the way down the page, you will read:

The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows:

1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown.
2d. By information, to bring certain classes of persons accused of crimes and misdemeanors to trial.
3rd. By scire facias, to revoke and annul grants made by the crown improperly, or when forfeited by the grantee thereof.
4th. By information, to recover money or other chattels, or damages for wrongs committed on the land, or other possessions of the crown.
5th. By writ of quo warranto, to determine the right of him who claims or usurps any office, franchise or liberty, and to vacate the charter, or annul the existence of a corporation, for violations of its charter, or for omitting to exercise its corporate powers.
6th. By writ of mandamus, to compel the admission of an officer duly chosen to his office, and to compel his restoration when illegally ousted.
7th. By information in chancery, to enforce trusts, and to prevent public nuisances, and the abuse of trust powers.
8th. By proceedings in rem, to recover property to which the crown may be entitled, by forfeiture for treason, and property, for which there is no other legal owner, such as wrecks, treasure trove, &c. (3 Black. Com., 256-7, 260 to 266; id., 427 and 428; 4 id., 308, 312.)
9th. And in certain cases, by information in chancery, for the protection of the rights of lunatics, and others, who are under the protection of the crown. (Mitford's Pl., 24-30, Adams' Equity, 301-2.)

Logged

Giving frees us from the familiar territory of our own needs, while opening our minds to the unexplained worlds occupied by the needs of others.
MonkeyPuppet
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,943


aut libertas aut mors


« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2012, 12:10:38 PM »


Because this country is still a territory of Great Britian.

Oh yeah? PROVE IT!

OK. Go to http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/about/history.html
About 2/3 of the way down the page, you will read:

The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows:

1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown.


Context is everything.  Prior to the 1870 Illinois Constitution, the "crown" was in fact "the people" as a matter of common law in practice in the state of Illinois.  Much of the office powers were simply assumed by those then obliged to the will of the People.  With the 1870 Constitution, all of that confusing crown crap went away... keep in mind that it took the state 52 years to achieve this, and a cursory review of the original 1818 convention makes it obvious that "the crown" never meant the British crown.  Such a reference is never once made.  Instead, "the crown" was merely common parlance for the sovereign... which was the state, or the People, depending on the context.

The office of the Attorney General was created by the General Assembly and then later added as a Constitutional executive office.

Illinois Constitution (1818), Schedule, Section 10
An auditor of public accounts, an attorney general, and such other officers for the state as may be necessary, may be appointed by the general assembly, whose duties may be regulated by law.

Illinois State Constitution (1870), Article V, Section 15
The Attorney General shall be the legal officer of the State, and shall have the duties and powers that may be prescribed by law.

The "law" to which this section is referring, is that of the State Constitution itself, the federal Constitution insofar as it may prescribe or prohibit with regard the powers of the state, and to that of the legislative Acts of the Senate and House (the General Assembly).
Logged


Income Tax: Shattering The Myths
w w w . original intent . o r g

The 1911 in .45 ACP... don't leave home without it!  Safety first!!
MonkeyPuppet
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,943


aut libertas aut mors


« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2012, 12:16:50 PM »


Governments on all levels within this country are corporations.


Correct.

These are 14th Amendment persons, endowed with certain privileges resembling the rights of flesh and blood humans... to own and sell property, to incur debt, to sue and be sued, to be parties in litigation, etc.

In a perfect world, this wouldn't really be that big of a deal.  However, as we can see from the derivatives scandal, it is a manner of government organization that is unworkable in a Republic.

The fact that the vast majority of people in this country couldn't give less of a f**k means that this corruption will continue in perpetuity unless stopped in an abrupt and forceful manner.
Logged


Income Tax: Shattering The Myths
w w w . original intent . o r g

The 1911 in .45 ACP... don't leave home without it!  Safety first!!
KD7ONE
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 531



WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2012, 05:31:18 PM »

You are absolutly right. http://www.manta.com/c/mm5wcyl/representative-ron-paul As a matter of fact, when a member of Congress receives money and uses it in ads for their campaign, they get that money back, because, according to the IRS Code, it is a business expense. After all, even Ron Paul is a corporation.

Look at all the money he got in those money bombs 4 years ago. What good did it do?
Logged

Giving frees us from the familiar territory of our own needs, while opening our minds to the unexplained worlds occupied by the needs of others.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!