PrisonPlanet Forum
May 25, 2013, 11:04:29 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: How long Before UAV's Take Down US Commercial Air Traffic?  (Read 934 times)
John_Back_From_The_Club_O
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,169



WWW
« on: May 21, 2012, 12:22:23 AM »

As the UAV announcement over the US was given the first thing that came to my mind was... "How long before mid air crashes become common place between UAV's and commercial air traffic?"

It didn't take too long.
A drone near-disaster?
http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/denvers_drone_near_disaster/singleton/

... and just as I predicted, the lame brain media covers for their pimp daddy government by reporting the near collision as almost a 'UFO' type of incident.  

This is NOT Afghanistan.  The USA has more air traffic bar none than ANY country in the world .  SEE VIDEO ILLUSTRATION OF THIS BELOW.
http://www.aaronkoblin.com/work/flightpatterns/

These UAV's do NOT have to 'report' their whereabouts to ANY towers or to the FAA.  They fly in AND outside of vectors strictly enforced upon ALL other aircraft.

It's only a matter of time as UAV air traffic increases that collisions will occur.   ... and so to will the lying on what downed these aircraft.

YET, as the US government takes down it's own citizens aircraft TSA will still have to touch your 14 year old daughter's v-jay jay to keep you safe!  
Logged

Corporate Presstitutes got yer SMELLIVISION!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxgagXVqZZM
John_Back_From_The_Club_O
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,169



WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2012, 12:37:25 AM »

Oh, and BTW.

Since UAV's have ZERO accountability, why not use several of them to shoot down lots of commercial aircraft and blame it all on the flavor of the week?
Logged

Corporate Presstitutes got yer SMELLIVISION!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxgagXVqZZM
SUPREMEMASTER
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,672


Commander


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2012, 02:11:45 AM »

They (the treasonous establishment/government) could deliberately blow up a plane externally with a military UAV and then falsely claim that there was bomb onboard the plane which was internally detonated by a terrorist.

A full-scale news psy. operation would accompany the event with persistent peer-pressure of the malicious narrative.
Logged

Automatic User Post Signature:
The message has to be put out in the right way.
Website Still Needs to be updated |ActivismOverDrive.comze.net|
Brocke
Eleutherophiliac & Drapetomaniac
Global Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9,403


I am not a number, I am a free man!


WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2012, 03:09:12 AM »

It makes operations like this all the more easy.



Silenced: TWA 800 and the Subversion of Justice

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7552065575091502192&hl=en

57:59 - 2009



This documentary proves that the U.S. government-including the FBI and DOJ-are totally corrupt and involved in serious felony crime and the outrageous cover-up of truth concerning the mysterious crash of TWA Flight 800 on July 17, 1996. As you will see, Flight 800 was actually destroyed by a surface-to-air missile. Every allegation made in this film is backed up with facts-none more dramatic than those that come from the Federal government itself. You'll learn what the 736 official eyewitnesses actually saw; why aviators reject the CIA "cartoon" explanation; how the Feds criminally suppressed reporting; the critical witness drawings; the rigged NTSB hearings; the damning radar data and documentation; the altered physical evidence; undeniable proof of explosive residue proving a missile strike; the stinging report from the machinist union; and much more!

http://www.1-free-dvd.com http://thesenatorhillary.blogspot.com
Logged



That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history.
~Aldous Huxley
JT Coyoté
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,047


"REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"


« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2012, 03:30:09 AM »

The thing I find interesting in the reporting of this incident is the subtle way they imply the capability of the UAV as, being computer controlled using direct autonomous sensing and superior actuation, it could not have been at fault. It had to have been the HUMAN pilot of the airliner that was in error. This is such bullshit...

If the superiority of these things is so pronounced, why was there a near collision at all, unless that was the mission of the robot in the first place... is this how the bastards plan to induce the populace to accept the roll out of robotic controlled airliners like the ones they used on the twin towers... or will they have to kill a few thousand people in drone caused air crashes first?

This crap makes me sick.

JTCoyoté

"I consider the war of America against Britain as the
country's war, the public's war, or the war of the people
in their own behalf, for the security of their natural rights,
and the protection of their own property."

~Thomas Paine, 1782
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!