|
chris jones
|
 |
« on: June 05, 2010, 08:10:18 AM » |
|
World War Three in Brief A Three World War scenario was developed several decades ago . Two World Wars have already been achieved, and the Third and final World War envisions an attack on Iraq, Iran and/or Syria as being the trigger to set the entire Middle East into fiery conflagration. Once America is firmly entrenched into the Middle East with the majority of her first-line units, North Korea is to attack South Korea. Then, with America's forces stretched well beyond the limit, China is to invade Taiwan. This will usher in the start of World War Three.
World War Definition: What constitutes a 'world war'? How many countries need to be involved? And who decides at which point a number of regional skirmishes can be grouped together and called a World War? At the time, who called the official start of World War 1 and World War 2? And have you noticed that although the term 'World War Three' is freely used in the alternative press and on the Internet, all the major news networks have stoically avoided using any phrase reminiscent of World War. Since it's difficult to find a definition for an event which has only happened twice in modern history, here's my attempt at an answer to the question 'what constitutes a world war'? A World War is a military conflict spanning more than 2 continents, in which at least 20 major countries participate in an attack against a common enemy, and which has the attention of the man-in-the-street due to the significant loss of life. Rumsfeld described the coalition in Iraq as composed of 34 allies (plus the US). As of June 13, 2006, MNF-I reported that 27 countries (including the US) ... Countries which had troops in or supported operations in Iraq at one point . Terminoligy, give it a name! World war was a term, a word, a description give by a German, to be carried on by Times magazine. The impression, the image is that of super powers at larger heads, is it that alone. We conjur up imagery of WW II, of an apocolypse, nuclear missles, is it that alone.
There are at present 27 nations involved in this war on terror so called, 5 nations have been invaded, Iraq alone has suffered casualtys listing in at 1,300,000, give it a name??? The invasions continue of over a ten years span in Afghanistan.. i do not intend to split hairs over the terminoligy, the word, the definition of WW. My intent on posting this is my oppinion only, we are in a third world war, or for those who resist this term I must ask them why.....If this is not WW III, at the very least it is the beggining. SC world wars/com & global security
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2010, 08:16:38 AM » |
|
looks like Einstein was wrong again.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Theorist
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2010, 08:17:21 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chris jones
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2010, 08:19:19 AM » |
|
looks like Einstein was wrong again.
Hi Dok, please expand, thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2010, 08:20:58 AM » |
|
Hi Dok, please expand, thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
H0llyw00d
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2010, 08:46:30 AM » |
|
ya, Einstein was wrong because there won't be a WW4...EVER! WW3 (possibly this year) will end most of the douchebaggery and ineptness and ALL of the gen pop, with an assist from "technology", "change", & the "status quo".
"Don't worry folks, it'll all be over in a few seconds....." ~T. McViegh
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ekimdrachir
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2010, 09:09:13 AM » |
|
Cant make money with total nuclear war. We are saved by our own Greed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dig
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2010, 09:15:58 AM » |
|
Saturday, June 5, 2010 Webster Tarpley WW3 Scenario if Iran is attacked World War 3(Iran-sanctions or attack) Scenario By Webster Tarpley- STOP this nonsense Webster Tarpley - Consequences of a U.S. attack on Iran : what would the global consequences be after a US led attack on Iran ? http://geraldcelentechannel.blogspot.com/2010/06/webster-tarpley-ww3-scenario-if-iran-is.htmlWebster Tarpley gives an account of what the global consequences of an attack on Iran by U.S. forces would be. 'Stop this insanity now!' Webster Griffin Tarpley is an author, journalist, lecturer, and critic of US foreign and domestic policy. Tarpley maintains that the September 11 attacks were engineered by a rogue network of the military industrial complex and intelligence agencies. His writings and speeches describe a model of false flag terror operations by a rogue network in the military/intelligence sector working with moles in the private sector and in corporate media, and locates such contemporary false flag operations in a historical context stretching back in the English speaking world to at least the "gunpowder plot" in England in 1605.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
chris jones
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2010, 09:22:14 AM » |
|
Hi Dok, please expand, thank you.
OK, but pray tell, how does it begin? the ending you have confirmed, please illustrate what you beleive to be the beggining.I take it your of the oppinion our current and ongoing wars are but a War On Terror-, nothing more, am I correct. I have no beef with Einstein, I agree, did he also say how it would begin, if this is not the entry into the abomination what is it. I would sincerely appreciate your terminoligy, your oppinion of a title, your veiw of what exactly these multiple invasions, continuing wars, genocide, 27 nations involved, etc, give it a name Dok. I suppose we could sit back and wait untill they push the Ol button, the nukes are in the air, and in that fleeting moment declare we are witnessing WW III ,,that is if we had time to get the words out. Last line of prior post: I do not intend to split hairs over the terminoligy, the word, the definition of WW. My intent on posting this is my oppinion only, we are in a third world war, or for those who resist this term I must ask them why.....If this is not WW III, at the very least it is the beggining.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Kilika
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2010, 09:40:07 AM » |
|
OK, but pray tell, how does it begin? the ending you have confirmed, please illustrate what you beleive to be the beggining. I take it your of the oppinion our current and ongoing wars are but a War On Terror-, nothing more, am I correct. I have no beef with Einstein, I agree, did he also say how it would begin, if this is not the entry into the abomination what is it. I would sincerely appreciate your terminoligy, your oppinion of a title, your veiw of what exactly these multiple invasions, continuing wars, genocide, 27 nations involved, etc, give it a name Dok.
I suppose we could sit back and wait untill they push the Ol button, the nukes are in the air, and in that fleeting moment declare we are witnessing WW III ,,that is if we had time to get the words out.
Last line of prior post: I do not intend to split hairs over the terminoligy, the word, the definition of WW. My intent on posting this is my oppinion only, we are in a third world war, or for those who resist this term I must ask them why.....If this is not WW III, at the very least it is the beggining.
"For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these [are] the beginnings of sorrows." Mark 13:8 (KJB)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows." 1 Timothy 6:10 (KJB)
|
|
|
|
chris jones
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2010, 10:55:10 AM » |
|
Russian Geopolitical Analyst: “World War III Has Already Begun” Sivkov is convinced that WW III is already going on “History shows that the elite of ’selfish’ civilizations do not get stopped by human sacrifices if there is a guarantee they, themselves, will survive in bunkers. The analysis shows that if a new world war is waged, it will touch the majority of the world population. Total demographic losses may exceed several hundred millions of people worldwide. Therefore, all honest people on Earth, including those who form the ’selfish’ coalition, must do everything they can not to allow it to happen. To do this, we have to mitigate with the force of law and other methods, the greed of transnational and national tycoons of the financial sector. We have to stop their ambitious, greedy, shameless and sometime stupid politicians. This can only be done based on broad international collaboration efforts,” concludes Sivkov.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chris jones
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2010, 11:06:35 AM » |
|
George Bush...US President George W Bush has referred to the "war on terror" as "World War III" during a television interview.
I hate quoting the traitor, but often times he has given us a heads up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clint giles
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2010, 03:05:13 PM » |
|
World War Three in Brief A Three World War scenario was developed several decades ago . Two World Wars have already been achieved, and the Third and final World War envisions an attack on Iraq, Iran and/or Syria as being the trigger to set the entire Middle East into fiery conflagration. Once America is firmly entrenched into the Middle East with the majority of her first-line units, North Korea is to attack South Korea. Then, with America's forces stretched well beyond the limit, China is to invade Taiwan. This will usher in the start of World War Three.
World War Definition: What constitutes a 'world war'? How many countries need to be involved? And who decides at which point a number of regional skirmishes can be grouped together and called a World War? At the time, who called the official start of World War 1 and World War 2? And have you noticed that although the term 'World War Three' is freely used in the alternative press and on the Internet, all the major news networks have stoically avoided using any phrase reminiscent of World War. Since it's difficult to find a definition for an event which has only happened twice in modern history, here's my attempt at an answer to the question 'what constitutes a world war'? A World War is a military conflict spanning more than 2 continents, in which at least 20 major countries participate in an attack against a common enemy, and which has the attention of the man-in-the-street due to the significant loss of life. Rumsfeld described the coalition in Iraq as composed of 34 allies (plus the US). As of June 13, 2006, MNF-I reported that 27 countries (including the US) ... Countries which had troops in or supported operations in Iraq at one point . Terminoligy, give it a name! World war was a term, a word, a description give by a German, to be carried on by Times magazine. The impression, the image is that of super powers at larger heads, is it that alone. We conjur up imagery of WW II, of an apocolypse, nuclear missles, is it that alone.
There are at present 27 nations involved in this war on terror so called, 5 nations have been invaded, Iraq alone has suffered casualtys listing in at 1,300,000, give it a name??? The invasions continue of over a ten years span in Afghanistan.. i do not intend to split hairs over the terminoligy, the word, the definition of WW. My intent on posting this is my oppinion only, we are in a third world war, or for those who resist this term I must ask them why.....If this is not WW III, at the very least it is the beggining. SC world wars/com & global security
Chris Jones after reading your post,i think you are very correct. when one actually looks at it,and understands where its going,yes ww3 is on !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Freeski
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: July 02, 2011, 11:44:51 AM » |
|
Problem...Iran Funnels New Weapons to Iraq and AfghanistanJULY 2, 2011 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303763404576420080640167182.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStoriesBy JAY SOLOMON TEHRAN—Iran's elite military unit, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, has transferred lethal new munitions to its allies in Iraq and Afghanistan in recent months, according to senior U.S. officials, in a bid to accelerate the U.S. withdrawals from these countries. The Revolutionary Guard has smuggled rocket-assisted exploding projectiles to its militia allies in Iraq, weapons that have already resulted in the deaths of American troops, defense officials said. They said Iranians have also given long-range rockets to the Taliban in Afghanistan, increasing the insurgents' ability to hit U.S. and other coalition positions from a safer distance. Such arms shipments would escalate the shadow competition for influence playing out between Tehran and Washington across the Middle East and North Africa, fueled by U.S. preparations to draw down forces from two wars and the political rebellions that are sweeping the region.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
|
|
|
|