Spewing Malthusian propaganda in an anti-Malthusian forum

Let me get this straight. Your system has freedom as it's cornerstone, despite everything. What freedom is it to be forced to do the work you're lucky enough to get in order to get enough living to keep you from revolting? Why at all do you need to work somebody who's supposed to be wiser than you who shows such maliciousness. The guys at the top like Murdoch, Gates etc. That in itself is a paradox you want to break, because if you or anyone else doesn't, that won't change. Because that ain't true freedom, just survival forcing with some bread crusts called choises. Those too are scarse.

When you have a roof over your head, stable food source you can work out by yourself and enough energy to supply your needs and the waste circulation system, the basic self-sufficiency, you're free from the money chain. Except for real estate tax, but isn't that pretty small per-year payment? If you don't have these things, you'll be struggling with same problems with the same cycle. Or at least, if someone you can count on a bit more isn't supplying them for you. There's the beef, everyone doesn't have to have a backyard farm, solar panels nor even a graywater disposal system that works for nature, as long as there's enough of those things produced for everyone's needs.

It may sound utopistic and I didn't tell half of it here, but I claim that unless you have just plain malicious people taking control of that system, it's pretty much fool-proof, not an utopistic thing. Here's the core of it: your current food-production is mainly in the hands of big corps and their harmful plow-pesticide-cattle-antibiotic-pill-GMO-ways are just that, harmful compared to what's available for you. Or well, available as long as you got the land to farm on. It's the natural way of farming reinvented by Masanoby Fukuoka, Bill Mollison, Joe Salatin and many others. Controlling money is nothing more than controlling food and property values, things you buy with them in order to live a non-starving non-cold life. You figure out how to get rid of real estate tax for smaller and medium sized lots and that's it. Make it in your constitution that no man should pay it from small and medium sized lots.

There's still the problem of there being too many people and too little land to produce food on, in future. As for that, I don't know. Make population limits per state or per county, and have two-or three-child policy instead of one?