Being Autistic Soars By 56% In Five Years. Medical Mafia Pats Itself On Back!

Author Topic: Being Autistic Soars By 56% In Five Years. Medical Mafia Pats Itself On Back!  (Read 25341 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
The medical mafia would call a ham sandwich 'autistic' if it would mean giving themselves more power and control.

This would be considered AN EPIDEMIC if it were something NOT directly linked to vaccines AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL TOXINS.

STOPPING AUTISM STARTS BY STOPPING VACCINES!  What will it take for parents to put 1 + 1 together?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of schoolchildren classified as being autistic soars by 56% in five years.

'We don't know for sure whether autism has increased or if we have just got better at diagnosing the condition,' says charity spokeswoman


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2118804/Autism-Number-schoolchildren-classified-autistic-soars-56-years.html#ixzz1puJMETwQ
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline Highland

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
 Blinded by hyper commune group paranoia, fear and greed the USA medical system is talking about the complete termination of individual freedom and religious freedom in the USA.

 Religious freedom means complete control over the substances that go into you or your child's body. The state seeks to automatically classify you as a "man or other animal" and sell you into destructive commune corporation bondage. Millions of USA chemical casualties are now suffering with the sv40 cancer virus that was found in the polio vaccine 50 years ago. It has taken 50 years for small amounts of the sv40 virus information to get out to the public. The sv40 cancer virus has now been found to be contagious from person to person and is also passed on to future generations. The medical system continues to blame cancer on the individual and their family's while they charge the highest inflationary prices in the world for highly questionable degradative cancer treatments.
 
 Doctors that can not make an individual observation of autism (brain damage) in the vaccinated and no brain damage in the unvaccinated, also being unable to act on the information in a positive way are merely corporation group workers for profit. 

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,170
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Blinded by hyper commune group paranoia, fear and greed the USA medical system is talking about the complete termination of individual freedom and religious freedom in the USA.

 Religious freedom means complete control over the substances that go into you or your child's body. The state seeks to automatically classify you as a "man or other animal" and sell you into destructive commune corporation bondage. Millions of USA chemical casualties are now suffering with the sv40 cancer virus that was found in the polio vaccine 50 years ago. It has taken 50 years for small amounts of the sv40 virus information to get out to the public. The sv40 cancer virus has now been found to be contagious from person to person and is also passed on to future generations. The medical system continues to blame cancer on the individual and their family's while they charge the highest inflationary prices in the world for highly questionable degradative cancer treatments.
 
 Doctors that can not make an individual observation of autism (brain damage) in the vaccinated and no brain damage in the unvaccinated, also being unable to act on the information in a positive way are merely corporation group workers for profit. 

It worse.

The medical mafia wants bureaucrats and crooked judges to become 'medical authorities'.  By dosing the people who want their god given autonomy over their OWN bodies.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline Highland

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
It worse.

The medical mafia wants bureaucrats and crooked judges to become 'medical authorities'.  By dosing the people who want their god given autonomy over their OWN bodies.

The scientific medical bureaucracy has become Jim Jones suicide group commune paranoid and is very busy promoting the like minded. They promote fear and soft kill death resulting in their profit. What should happen is that 90% of the disease creating life shortening phych drugs that are now given to normal foster children and others creating a large percentage of unnecessary chemical casualties should be diverted over to people in the scientific and medical corporation worker groups that cant seem to get their minds on things that don't involve anti-free commune group population reduction and anti-freedom pyramid scam control of the population.

Offline Conflagration2100

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
New England Journal of Medicine


Effects of Diets High in Sucrose or Aspartame on The Behavior and Cognitive Performance of Children

Mark L. Wolraich, Scott D. Lindgren, Phyllis J. Stumbo, Lewis D. Stegink, Mark I. Appelbaum, and Mary C. Kiritsy

N Engl J Med 1994; 330:301-307February 3, 1994

Abstract
Article
References
Citing Articles (62)
Letters

    Refined sugar (especially sucrose) and aspartame (α-aspartyl-l-phenylalanine-o-methyl ester) have each been considered a possible cause of hyperactivity and other behavior problems in children1,2. The presumed reaction to sucrose has been attributed to several possible causes, including a rise in blood sugar shortly after ingestion, reactive hypoglycemia several hours after ingestion, and an allergic response3. The presumed reaction to aspartame has been attributed to the possibility that its metabolism results in elevated plasma phenylalanine concentrations, which in turn may alter the transport of essential amino acids to the brain1,4,5.

    Despite subjective reports about the behavioral effects of sugar and aspartame, most controlled studies have not found consistent adverse effects6,7. Previous studies with controlled designs have examined the behavior of children immediately after a dietary challenge, but these studies have been criticized for their brief duration and laboratory settings6. Some argue that preschool children may be especially sensitive to sugar8 and that its effects may vary depending on the ratio of sugar to protein and carbohydrate in food recently consumed6. Such arguments have not resolved the issue of whether dietary sweeteners have long-term behavioral effects.

    Despite the lack of consistent objective data demonstrating the behavioral or cognitive effects of sugar or aspartame, subjective reports of such adverse effects continue to be widespread. Because sucrose and aspartame are common components of children's diets, any possible relation between these sweeteners and behavior is a major health concern. To test the hypothesis that sucrose or aspartame affects behavior and cognitive performance in children, we evaluated children placed on diets high in sucrose, aspartame, or saccharin (placebo) in a double-blind study with a Latin square design and a broad range of dependent measures.
    Methods
    Subjects

    The subjects were recruited through advertisements in the popular media and presentations at preschool programs. Sugar-sensitive children were identified on the basis of reports by their parents.

    Two cohorts of children were studied concurrently. One group consisted of 23 children of primary-school age (6 to 10 years) reported by their parents to respond adversely to sugar, and the other group consisted of 25 normal preschool-age children (3 to 5 years of age).
    Design

    The study protocol was approved by the University of Iowa Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. The subjects and their families were placed on a different diet for each of three consecutive three-week periods. One of the three diets was high in sucrose with no artificial sweeteners, another was low in sucrose and contained aspartame, and the third was low in sucrose and contained saccharin (the placebo). All diets were essentially free of additives, artificial food coloring, and preservatives. Two of the diet sequences are shown in Table 1Table 1Diet Sequences for Two Subjects in a Latin-Square Design for Experimental Diets with a Random Distribution of Sham Diets..

    The children, their families, and the research staff were kept unaware of the sequence of the diets. This blinding was reinforced by visible changes made weekly in the diets (sham diets), but the sweetener was changed only every third week. Families were informed that the diets would change weekly and were given a list of the dietary components that were either varied or controlled. The parents were asked to identify the experimental variables each week, if they could.
    Provision of Diets

    Immediately before the beginning of the study, a dietitian supervised the removal of food from the children's home. During the nine-week study period, all foods were provided for the subject and his or her immediate family. Family members were allowed items not included in the diet when they were out of the home and away from the subject, and coffee and alcohol were allowed to remain in the home as long as they were not consumed by the children. The food was delivered in a van equipped to serve as a mobile testing laboratory. All food was removed from the home at the end of each week, and a new supply delivered. In addition, parents kept records of all food consumed by the subjects and were encouraged to report any deviations from the specified diet.

    During each three-week diet period, foods were sweetened with sucrose, aspartame, or saccharin, depending on which diet was assigned for that period. Care was taken to keep the appearance of the sweetened products identical, regardless of the sweetener used. Sweetened foods included pure fruit juice, fruit, cereals, pudding, flavored yogurt, cookies, fruit toppings, and bottled carbonated soft drinks. The soft drinks were supplied by three national bottlers in unmarked but coded bottles; unsweetened fruit juice and unsweetened cereal were provided by two national distributors. Small amounts of saccharin were used to sweeten items, such as condiments, that were consumed in small amounts by the subjects during all nine weeks. The use of various food components popularly believed to influence behavior was kept to a minimum. These included artificial colors, artificial flavors, additives, monosodium l-glutamate, chocolate, and caffeine. Shortenings and oils used in the diets did not contain butylated hydroxyanisole or butylated hydroxytoluene, and the use of frozen meats and baked products treated with these antioxidants was kept to a minimum. The three sham diets consisted of abundant quantities of red and orange foods (diet A); beef and pork, with only raw fruits and vegetables (diet B); and chicken and fish, with only cooked fruits and vegetables (diet C) (Table 1).
    Dietary Intake

    Dietary intake was documented in diaries by the parents and reviewed weekly with the dietitian. Parents were taught how to estimate the amounts of food consumed, and each week they received seven diary sheets listing the daily menus. The study design imposed no restrictions on the quantity of each food consumed, and parents were asked not to restrict access to any food.
    Compliance

    To determine dietary compliance, 1 mg of ascorbic acid per milligram of aspartame was added to foods sweetened with aspartame, and 1 mg of riboflavin per 5 g of sucrose was added to foods sweetened with sucrose. These concentrations provide at least 10 times the recommended dietary allowances,9 with the amount excreted roughly proportional to the amount of sweetener ingested. Urine samples were obtained weekly and tested for ascorbate, riboflavin, and creatinine10-12.
    Behavioral and Cognitive Measures

    The children were initially evaluated by means of a structured psychiatric interview with the parent (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children -- Parent Version),13 the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -- Revised14 or the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence,15 and the Wide Range Achievement Test -- Revised16 (for school-age children only). At base line and during each of the nine weeks of the study, the subjects were evaluated with behavioral and cognitive measures hypothesized to be sensitive to the effects of sweetener (Table 2Table 2Cognitive and Behavioral Measures Administered Weekly.). During base-line testing, children were oriented to the tests, and appropriate levels of difficulty were determined for the learning and academic tasks. This served to minimize the effects of practice during the study period. Motor activity was assessed with a solid-state device for measuring motion28. Five-second time sampling was used to assess behavior and activity levels during the performance of a writing or drawing task29. Several tasks (e.g., card sorting and academic tests) were too difficult to be administered to the preschool children. Children rated their mood and physical state on a visual-analogue scale20 adapted from a self-report measure used to assess the effects of stimulants in previous studies30. Measures were administered in the mobile laboratory each week on the same day of the week and at the same time of day. In addition, structured ratings of specific types of behavior were completed by the children's parents, the children's teachers, and research assistants (Table 2). For the preschool-age children, the teacher's rating was completed by a preschool teacher or a care giver other than the mother.
    Biochemical Tests

    Base-line biochemical tests included a fasting sucrose-tolerance test and fasting plasma amino acid analyses. Sucrose tolerance was calculated by determining blood glucose concentrations in samples drawn at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4.5 hours after a sucrose drink (1.75 g per kilogram of body weight). On the third, sixth, and ninth weeks of the study, postprandial blood samples for plasma glucose and amino acid analyses were drawn 2 to 3 hours after a meal and 30 to 60 minutes after the subject had drunk 250 ml (8 oz) of an uncarbonated beverage (providing 170 mg of aspartame, 30 g of sucrose, or 40 mg of saccharin). Plasma glucose concentrations were assessed by the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase method. Plasma amino acid levels were determined with automated amino acid analyzers (Beckman 121 MB; Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, Calif.),31 and these calculations included the molar ratio of the plasma phenylalanine concentration to the sum of the concentrations of the other large neutral amino acids32 sharing its transport to the brain.
    Statistical Analysis

    The analysis was designed to evaluate a large number of possible effects. At the same time, it was important that significance levels not be set so conservatively that we would incorrectly accept the null hypothesis despite clinically important differences; for this reason, Bonferroni corrections were not applied. Similarly, multivariate analyses were not used because of concern about a reduction in the degrees of freedom and difficulty in handling selective missing data in such analyses. Separate repeated-measures analyses of variance were carried out for each dependent variable, and individual comparisons among the three treatments were made with Tukey's test, each at the 0.05 level of significance. Although this approach increased the chance of a type I error, it maximized our ability to detect any differences attributable to the sweeteners. The use of a counterbalanced Latin square design33 eliminated the possibility that practice or the sequence of the diets would account for differences in the cognitive or behavioral variables.

    To increase the reliability of the cognitive and behavioral assessments, the three scores obtained for each dietary period were averaged, and these mean scores were compared by a repeated-measures analysis of variance. To detect possible cumulative effects, the results from the final week of each period were also compared. In addition, analyses of variance were performed to determine whether the sham diets had any influence on the cognitive and behavioral variables. Dietary intake was calculated for each treatment period and for each sham diet during that period. The intake of macronutrients, sweeteners, and vitamin markers was tabulated, and differences were evaluated with an analysis of variance.

    To identify individual subjects who may have responded adversely to sugar or aspartame, the weekly scores for each of nine core neurobehavioral measures were ranked and examined to determine whether the poorest scores were clustered during a particular dietary period. This approach was considered preferable to setting a fixed cutoff point for differences (e.g., a 25 percent change) because of the wide variation in raw scores among the variables studied and in score levels at different ages.
    Results
    Subjects

    Fifty-eight subjects were recruited for the study. Pilot studies of the first three subjects were used to refine the protocol; these children were therefore eliminated from the final analysis. Three subjects were eliminated because of poor compliance, as confirmed by the weekly urine tests for ascorbate and riboflavin; three withdrew before completing the study; and one (the youngest) was unable to complete the cognitive and behavioral assessments.

    The 48 remaining subjects (25 normal preschool children and 23 school-age children thought to be sensitive to sugar) tended to have average academic skills and above-average intellectual ability, with a mean IQ (±SD) of 125 ±11 and 117 ±10, respectively (range, 95 to 144). The mean number of years of maternal education was 15.5 and 14.7, respectively (range, 12 to 20). The mean age was 4.7 years (range, 3 to 5) in the preschool group and 8.1 years (range, 6 to 10) in the school-age group; 48 percent of the younger children and 78 percent of the older children were boys. No psychiatric disorders were identified in the preschool group. Five of the presumably sugar-sensitive children met the criteria for attention-deficit disorder with hyperactivity, and two of the five also met the criteria for oppositional defiant disorder; two other children met the criteria for oppositional defiant disorder alone.
    Dietary Consumption

    The preschool children ingested a mean of 5600 ±2100 mg of sucrose per kilogram per day while on the sucrose diet, 38 ±13 mg of aspartame per kilogram per day while on the aspartame diet, and 12 ±4.5 mg of saccharin per kilogram per day while on the saccharin diet. The respective values for the school-age children thought to be sensitive to sugar were 4500 ±1200 mg of sucrose per kilogram, 32 ±8.9 mg of aspartame per kilogram, and 9.9 ±3.9 mg of saccharin per kilogram. The mean daily intake of energy and macronutrients (protein, fat, total carbohydrate, and sucrose), as well as saccharin, aspartame, riboflavin, and ascorbate, is shown in Table 3Table 3Mean Daily Intake of Energy and Nutrients during the Three-Week Diet Periods.. The intake values were calculated from the dietary records, summarized separately for each experimental period and for each sham diet. The mean daily intake of total carbohydrate and sucrose was approximately 65 g and 82 g higher, respectively, during the sucrose diet than during the other two diets. The daily intake of sucrose, carbohydrate, and energy differed significantly between the sucrose diet and the other two diets. Some small but significant differences among the sham diets were also found for certain variables. The parents of children completing the study reported only a small number of dietary infractions, which were included in the dietary analysis. Only one parent correctly identified the sequence of diets.
    Behavioral and Cognitive Measures

    The mean behavioral and cognitive variables are summarized in Table 4Table 4Cognitive and Behavioral Variables during the Three Diet Periods.. Two analyses were performed: one compared the mean values for the three-week dietary periods, and the other compared the mean values for the third week alone. The differences were identical in the two analyses, except for differences in pegboard performance, which were evident only in the analysis of the three-week means. Because the analyses were so similar, only the three-week means are presented.

    In the group of school-age children thought to be sensitive to sugar, none of the 39 behavioral and cognitive variables differed among the three dietary periods. In the normal preschool group, there were no significant differences in the 31 variables, with two exceptions. Parents' ratings on the cognition subscale of the Pediatric Behavior Scale were significantly better during the sucrose diet than during the aspartame and saccharin diets (P<0.008). Pegboard performance was significantly slower during the sucrose diet (Table 4), although it was still faster than average. No child in either group had an adverse response to sucrose or aspartame.
    Biochemical Tests

    The results of the base-line fasting sucrose-tolerance test were reviewed by a pediatric endocrinologist who was not one of the investigators. All the profiles were within normal limits, except that four subjects had slightly elevated glucose levels (173 to 187 mg per deciliter [9.61 to 10.4 mmol per liter]) one half-hour after the sucrose drink, and four subjects had low levels: three at two hours (55 to 59 mg per deciliter [3.06 to 3.28 mmol per liter]) and one at one hour (50 mg per deciliter [2.78 mmol per liter]). Postprandial glucose concentrations in the two groups of subjects did not differ significantly among the three diets.

    Base-line plasma phenylalanine concentrations were similar in the two groups (Table 5Table 5Postprandial Plasma Phenylalanine and Glucose Concentrations and the Ratio of Phenylalanine to Large Neutral Amino Acids, According to Diet.) and within the normal fasting range (mean of upper and lower limits, 0.81 ±0.13 mg per deciliter [49.0 ±8.0 μmol per liter])34. Postprandial plasma phenylalanine concentrations and the ratio of phenylalanine concentrations to the sum of the values for the other large neutral amino acids were significantly higher than base-line values in both groups during all three diets and were also significantly higher in both groups during the aspartame diet than during the sucrose and saccharine diet. Postprandial plasma phenylalanine values were within the normal range (mean of upper and lower limits, 1.29 ±0.19 mg per deciliter [78.1 ±11.8 μmol per liter]) in both groups during all three diets34.

    To evaluate the suggestion that people who are allergic to sucrose may need to be free of the nutrient before they respond to a challenge, we examined the data for all the children who were on the sucrose diet during the third dietary period. For each variable, the mean value for this period was subtracted from the mean value for the placebo (saccharin) period and the difference was compared with zero to determine whether there were any significant differences. None were found.
    Discussion

    The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that a diet high in either sucrose or aspartame adversely affects the behavior or cognitive functioning of children. There were few sweetener-related effects in either the preschool-age or the school-age children, and none of the children in either group had a consistently adverse response to either sucrose or aspartame. The findings were negative even though the older children were selected because their parents believed them to be sensitive to sugar and even though the children in both groups ingested substantial amounts of the sweeteners. Cognitive or behavioral differences were as likely to be found between sham diets as they were between experimental diets, and the few differences associated with the ingestion of sucrose were more consistent with a slight calming effect than with hyperactivity.

    The absence of effects in our study could have resulted from the use of insensitive measures or an inadequate statistical power to detect small differences, but neither explanation seems likely. The measures we used have proved to be sensitive to hyperactivity, attention deficits, and the effects of medications and foods in earlier research21,35. In addition, the study design provided sufficient statistical power to detect potential differences if they were present. On the basis of a calculation of power that used three core measures from the three primary sources of data (parents, teachers, and children), the study would have been able to detect an effect with an average size of 0.4 SD with a probability of approximately 0.55 or an effect with a size of 0.6 SD with a probability of 0.9. Given the large number of analyses, the number of differences found is no higher than the number that would be anticipated by chance alone.

    Despite the generally negative findings of this study, it is possible that there are some children who respond adversely to sugar or aspartame. Our subjects had average or above-average intelligence, and children with less intellectual ability may respond differently. However, the groups of children we studied should have maximized the likelihood of finding dietary effects. One group was composed of children whose parents considered them sensitive to sugar, and the other consisted of preschoolers, a population reported to be sensitive to dietary effects8.

    It could be argued that all three sweeteners had adverse effects. This possibility seems unlikely because behavior ratings and test scores generally improved during the dietary periods, as compared with the base-line values. Also, it is improbable that all three sweeteners could have had equally adverse effects on each of the diverse variables studied. It is particularly unlikely that our failure to observe any effects of aspartame or sucrose ingestion on behavior reflects an insufficient consumption of aspartame or sucrose. Calculations by the Market Research Corporation of America36,37 indicate that the highest daily aspartame intake under normal conditions ranges from 22 to 34 mg per kilogram, with a calculated 99th percentile of 34 mg per kilogram37 -- a value close to that observed in our study (32 mg per kilogram in the school-age subjects and 38 mg per kilogram in the preschool subjects). Data on sucrose intake in children are scarce, and comparisons require calculations. If the energy requirements of a 20-kg 4-to-6-year-old child range from 1300 to 2300 kcal per day, with 17 percent of the energy provided by sugar,9 the sucrose intake ranges from 2800 to 4900 mg per kilogram; similar calculations for a 28-kg 7-to-10-year-old child indicate an intake of 2500 to 5300 mg of sucrose per kilogram. In our study, the sucrose intake was 5600 ±2100 and 4500 ±1200 mg per kilogram in the preschool and school-age children, respectively -- values clearly at the upper end of the normal range.

    Large increases in the plasma phenylalanine concentrations (24.78 ±3.80 mg per deciliter [1500 ±230 μmol per liter]) and in the ratio of phenylalanine to the sum of the other large neutral amino acids (4.17 ±1.42; normal value, 0.11 ±0.01) are associated with adverse effects in children with phenylketonuria38. By comparison, these values were much lower in our subjects (Table 5). The slight increases noted in the children in our study while they were on the aspartame diet would be unlikely to produce adverse effects, particularly when these values are evaluated in the light of the data of Waisbren and Levy and colleagues. Their data indicate that untreated mild hyperphenylalaninemia (6.8 mg per deciliter [410 μmol per liter]) in women was associated with a normal outcome in their offspring, including a normal IQ39,40.

    We conclude from this carefully controlled nine-week study that neither sucrose nor aspartame produces discernible cognitive or behavioral effects in normal preschool children or in school-age children believed to be sensitive to sugar.

    Supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD24751) and the Clinical Research Centers Branch (RR59), National Institutes of Health, and the Nutrition Foundation-International Life Sciences Institute.

    We are indebted to Dan Medenblik, Greg Peak, Lisa Marchman, Bridget Zimmerman, Robert Woolson, and Helen DeEmden for assistance with this research, and to General Mills, Libby's NutraSweet, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Royal Crown for supplying products for the study.
    Source Information

    From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.L.W.) and Psychology and Human Development (M.I.A.), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, and the Department of Pediatrics (S.D.L., L.D.S.) and the Clinical Research Center (P.J.S., M.C.K.), University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

    Address reprint requests to Dr. Wolraich at the Child Development Center, 2100 Pierce Ave., Nashville, TN 37232-3573.

Source:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199402033300501

Offline Conflagration2100

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Neurochemical Changes Following High-Dose Aspartame with Dietary Carbohydrates

N Engl J Med 1983; 309:429-430August 18, 1983


Online PDF Source
http://toxicology.usu.edu/endnote/Aspartame-induced-alterations.pdf

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,292
Donald Trump now believes Vaccines are causing Autism:
http://www.naturalnews.com/035486_Donald_T...nes_autism.html

Quote
(NaturalNews) In a stunning development for the ostracized, often criticized, vaccine safety awareness movement, cause celebre, and business mogul, Donald Trump raised concern about vaccinations on Monday, April 2, the anniversary of the fifth annual World Autism Awareness Day. Trump 'warned' Fox News viewers he "strongly believes that Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are linked to exposure to vaccines."1

During the interview, the tycoon revealed that a series of casual observations led him to the conclusion that '"monster" vaccinations cause Autism. The remark was probably a bombshell for pro-vaccine advocates including doctors, pharmaceutical companies, the government - and oh yes, Bill Gates. They have all fervently denied that observation -long a tenet of 'science-based research' - has anything to do with a medical outcome.

Trump acknowledged that speaking out against vaccines and the vaccine schedule is very controversial. But then he went on to state: "...I couldn't care less. I've seen people where they have a perfectly healthy child, and they go for the vaccinations and a month later the child is no longer healthy."
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Cause Of Autism Found!
http://gdsajj.wordpress.com/2010/05/02/cause-of-autism-found/

UPDATED
For whatever the reason you still have people out there in the world who must live under a rock because they babble the total ‘lame stream corporate media’ lie that mercury (Hg) has been eliminated from vaccines since the early 2000′s. THIS IS A OUTRIGHT FALSEHOOD! Please ask for the flu shot inserts and READ FOR YOURSELF. Mercury is in flu shots, MANY TIMES HIGHER then what was ever put into the MMR vaccine. There are also trace amounts of Hg in other vaccines.
—————————————————

No matter what ‘MedSpeak’ (works just like Lawyer speak) the Medical Industrial Complex uses to convince us all they haven’t a clue as to how on earth we got ALL these autistic kids and, NOW, adults all around us. Allow me to put 1 +1 together for them. Without all the ‘medspeak’ circular arguments, JUST SCIENTIFIC FACTS. Why do these kids with sever autism rock back and forth? Read through all, find out the answer and a whole lot more. This information IS sourced below. HOWEVER, the EPA ALSO backs up these sources as well.

1 Structural and Functional Abnormalities associated with various heavy metal toxins:

Speech and Language Deficits:

Speech disorders
Aluminum, Mercury

Loss of speech, developmental problems with language
Mercury

Speech comprehension deficits
Mercury

Dysarthria; articulation problems; slurred speech, unintelligible speech
Mercury

Cognitive Impairments:

Attentional problems (ADHD), lacks eye contact, impaired visual fixation
Lead, Mercury

Mental retardation, borderline intelligence
Arsenic, Lead, Mercury

Poor concentration, attention deficits (ADHD), response inhibition
Aluminum, Lead

Poor memory (short term, verbal, and auditory)
Aluminum, Lead

Difficulties understanding abstract ideas; difficulty carrying out complex commands
X Metals

Dementia; pre-senile and senile dementia
Aluminum

Stupor
Aluminum, Arsenic

Sensory Abnormalities:
Hearing loss, difficulty hearing
Arsenic, Lead, Mercury

Blurred vision; sensitivity to light
Arsenic, Mercury

Motor Disorders:
Choreiform movements, myoclonal jerks, unusual postures
Copper, Mercury

Difficulty walking, swallowing, talking
Copper, Mercury

Flapping, circling, rocking, toe walking
Mercury

Problems with intentional movements or imitation
Mercury

Abnormal gait/posture; incoordination, loss of balance; problems sitting, lying, crawling, and walking
Mercury

Decreased locomotor activity
Aluminum, Arsenic

Convulsions; seizure
Aluminum , Arsenic, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Thallium

Physiological Impairment
Brain and Central Nervous System:

Neurofibrillary tangles
Aluminum

Neuritis, retrobulbar neuritis; neuropathy
Aluminum, Arsenic, Thallium

Encephalopathy
Aluminum, Arsenic, Lead, Thallium

Accumulates in CNS structures
Aluminum, Mercury

Autonomic disturbances
Copper, Lead, Mercury, Thallium

Peripheral Nervous System:

Peripheral neuropathy
Arsenic, Mercury

Other Physical Disturbances:
Rashes, contact dermatitis, eczema, itchy/irritating skin
Aluminum, Arsenic, Copper, Mercury

Source

Fluoride Poisoning (Yes, Fluoride is in some vaccines)
ADHD/Learning Disorders (4,7)

Allergies (2)

Alzheimer’s Disease (5,6,46)

Anaphylactic Shock (life-threatening, allergic reactions) (2)

Asthenia (Weakness) (18)

Asthma (the loss of full control of bodily movements.) (2)

Autism (169) Gee, you think?

Behavioural Problems (3)

Cachexia (wasting away)(2)

Crying easily for no apparent reason (18)

Demyelinizing Disease (Where the myelin sheath of neurons is damaged) (2, 35)

Depression (8)

Epilepsy (2)

Eosinophilia (blood disorder also associated with some types of leukemia) (15)

Eye, ear and nose disorders (8)

Fibromyalgia (2)

Fibrosis (3)

Hyperparathyroidism (2)

Incoherence (8)

Inner Ear Disorders (2,5)

Lack of Co-ordination (2)

Loss of Appetite (2)

Loss of IQ (25)

Low Birth Weight (5)

Lupus (3)

Magnesium Deficiency (2

Memory Loss (13)

Mental Confusion (20)

Schizophrenia (18)

Seizures (13)

Sensitive to light (1,17)

1) Meiers P – “Zur Toxizität von Fluorverbindungen, mit besonderer
Berücksichtigung der Onkogenese”, Verlag für Medizin Dr. Ewald Fischer, Heidelberg (1984)

2) Waldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL – “Fluoridation:The Great Dilemma” Coronado Press (1978)

3) Yiamouyiannis J – “Fluoride – The Aging Factor”, 3rd. Edition, Health Action Press, 6439 Taggart Road, Delaware, Ohio (1993)

4) Mullenix PJ, Denbesten PK, Schunior A, Kernan WJ – “Neurotoxicity of Sodium Fluoride In Rats” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 17(2):169-177(1995)

5) Judd, G – “Good Teeth Birth To Death”, Research Publications, Glendale Arizona (1997), EPA Research #2 (1994)

6) Varner JA, Jensen KF, Horvath W, Isaacson RL – “Chronic administration of aluminum- fluoride or sodium-fluoride to rats in drinking water: alterations in neuronal and cerebrovascular integrity” Brain Research 784 284-298 (1998)

7) Zhao LB, Liang GH, Zhang DN, Wu XR – “Effect of high fluoride water supply on children’s intelligence” Fluoride 29 190-192 (1996)

8) Grimbergen GW -”A Double Blind Test for Determination of Intolerance to Fluoridated Water (Preliminary Report)” Fluoride 7:146-152 (1974)

13)Roholm, K.; Fluorine Intoxication – “A Clinical Hygiene Study, With A Review Of the Literature And Some Experimental Investigations” H.K. Lewis & Co., London (1937)

15)Hillman, D; Bolenbaugh, D.L;Convey E.M. -”Hypothyroidism and anemia related to fluoride in dairy cattle” J Dairy Sci 62(3):416-23 (1979)

17)Visnerevski, V – Gig Tr Prof Zabol 13:60 (1969)

18)Spira, L:”The Drama of Fluorine – Arch Enemy of Mankind” Milwaukee Press (1953) (Compilation of published articles)

20)Smith, MC- J Dent Res 14:139 (1934)

25)Li, X.S., Zhi, J.L., and Gao, R.O. “- Effect of fluoride exposure on intelligence in children” Fluoride 28 (1995)

35)Franke, J;Rath, F;Runge, H;Fengler, F;Auermann, E;Lenart G. – “Industrial Fluorosis” Fluoride 8:61-85 (1975)

46)May, W – “Behandlung der Hypothyreosen einschließlich des schweren genuinen Morbus Basedow mit Fluor” Klin Wochenschr 16:562-564 (1937)

169) Cathy Rookard, Director, ACIDD Association for Children and Infants with Digestive Disorders.

Formaldehyde (YES! Also in vaccines)

Chronic formaldehyde exposure at very low doses has been shown to cause immune system and nervous system changes and damage as well as headaches, general poor health, irreversible genetic damage, and a number of other serious health problems (Fujimaki 1992, He 1998, John 1994, Liu 1993, Main 1983, Molhave 1986, National Research Council 1981, Shaham 1996, Srivastava 1992, Vojdani 1992, Wantke 1996)

+1 Autism Symptoms: A complex ‘neurobiological disorder’.

Significant problems developing nonverbal communication skills, such as eye-to-eye gazing, facial expressions, and body posture.

Delay in, or lack of, learning to talk.

depression,

anxiety,

epilepsy

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

unusual sensory perceptions. (For example, they may describe a light touch as painful and deep pressure as providing a calming feeling.)

Sleep problems (occur in about 40% to 70% of people with autism.)

Source

=2 CAUSE!

Mercury, Aluminum, Fluoride and Formaldehyde are ALL neurological toxins’ to humans and give rise to the very symptoms autistic individuals have. THERE IS NO DEBATING THE NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE FROM THESE NEURO-TOXINS!!! ONLY when they are in vaccines do these neuro-toxins REINVENT themselves by the vaccine pushers as “HARMLESS”! AND, THEY ARE ALL IN VACCINES!!!!

When will a majority of people finally stand up and say enough is enough?. Kids are NOT inhaling, absorbing through their skin, or ingesting these neuro-toxins but, GETTING THEM INJECTED RIGHT INTO THEIR VEINS!!! All these neuro-toxins are bad enough by themselves but, combined and mixed together with viruses?!! Is it any wonder these kids (now adults) are literally losing or HAVE lost their minds, and or, central nervous system. Do we really need to shovel truckloads of money off some where looking for answers while scratching our heads wondering how this has ALL OF THE SUDDEN HAPPENED?

Why don’t we as a people do this. Stop these vaccines and see what happens when we are NOT injecting this poison into babies and children? I’d take my chances with measles before being lobotomized by toxic vaccine sludge any day!

I remember growing up with family and their friends who all worked with asbestos and that it effected different people differently. Some displayed severe symptoms of poisoning while others didn’t seem effected at all. I bring this up because the vaccine cult tries to imply a slick but, yet bogus and VERY DECEPTIVE claim that, if the neuro-toxic metals and chemicals used in vaccines caused the very neuro-degenerative effects to the human body THEY ARE KNOWN TO CAUSE, ‘ALL’ children would show the same side effects. Unfortunately for the vaccine cult, it does NOT work that way in the ‘real world’.

An independent film crew did a in-depth special on the first sea voyage to attempt to cross the Arctic Circle by ship. This documentary contains EXTREMELY IMPORTANT INFORMATION in understanding autism as a side effect of neuro-toxic poisoning. In the documentary it was WELL RECORDED AND DOCUMENTED that the neuro-degenerative poisoning of the crew did NOT occur in a EQUAL AND EVEN ‘ONE SIZE FITS ALL’ distribution. As a matter of fact, the scientists were ALL in agreement that when the first crew members became ill and died, had the expedition been halted at that time or just before. Some of the crew who ingested the same amount of lead toxicity WOULD HAVE SHOWN NO SIDE EFFECTS WHAT-SO-EVER while other members would have shown ‘A SPECTRUM’ of poisoning. From the dead at one end to, no apparent effect what-so-ever at the other end of the spectrum. This is exactly what you see in the case of autism. However, the crew of the ship at least didn’t have the lead injected into their veins. They simply ingested trace amounts, for their tin food cans and water storage were sealed with lead.

This is the very reason why the vaccine ‘schedule’ issue is a null and void useless issue until the toxins are removed from the vaccines. However, even with the metal and chemical toxins removed you still have the issue of stealth, lab and cancer viruses to have to deal with.

Below is a link where Dr. Blaylock debunks the crazy UNSCIENTIFIC claim of “acceptable exposure” to neuro-toxins.

ACCEPTABLE EXPOSURE MYTH / DISINFO
(go to link above to read Blaylock report)
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
I just want to say you mix the heavy metals in vaccines with the aspartame, high fructose corn syrup as stated above you have a nice crippling little cocktail.

ALSO, considering vaccines are loaded down with both cancer and 'stealth' viruses you may want to avoid all forms of radiation.  These viruses literally explode under radiation.  I would avoid getting a lot of cat scans, x -rays, excessive cell phone use and opt for the grope down to avoid the cancer scanners at the pedo airports.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline rustygunn

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
A relative of mine was a pharmacist for Rite Aid.  He said that they are setting targets for the amount of vaccines they intend to give.  They are starting to push vaccines....big time!

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
This has been going on for a while.

The big box drug stores have been doing everything from threatening employees who don't meet quotas to handing out ipads to those that do.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline rustygunn

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Thanks for all the information you provided John. 

Offline Conflagration2100

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
I don't doubt that all of the above mentioned Toxins were in their respective parts responsible for autism, as well as many other  neurological disorders. Since everyone is an Individual and each person susceptible to each element or compound, more or lesser in varying degrees, these toxins effect each of us in some manner, whether noticeable or not.   

Offline Poisonous-Truth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Autism is now an industry, each new vaccine-induced Autistic child is put on drugs for life, that is effectively a lifelong tax getting paid to Big Pharma, that's why they want more Autistics.

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,292
Much info on vaccines & autism that parents need to know:
http://www.nvic.org
http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Autism.aspx

Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,292
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline Conflagration2100

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
In response to  "Flu Shot Inserts" and all of the already well known Toxins added to vaccines, the bottom line is the "Unknown" contaminates that vaccines are known to have contained and are being found to still contain.


"Don't ignore the risk of vaccine contamination"

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v408/n6808/full/408018b0.html

Vaccine contamination is not some new, novel problem, but has firm roots founded in well documented medical history associated with the United States Military.

I'll list a few common historical examples;

"Yellow Fever Vaccine-Associated Hepatitis Epidemic During World War II: Follow-up More Than 40 Years Later-...

"it appears that about 330,000 men who received these vaccines developed HBV infection, the ratio of icteric:anicteric hepatitis being 1:7. This epidemic thus is the largest point-source hepatitis B outbreak ever recorded"

(Sources)

"Jaundice in Army personnel in the western region of the United States and its relation to vaccination against yellow fever" Sawyer WA Meyer KF Eaton MD Bauer JH Putnam P Schwentker FF , Am J Hyg 1944 ; 39 : 337-430

http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/39/3/337.extract

----------------------------------------------------------

"Mortality follow up of the 1942 epidemic of hepatitis B in the U.S. Army"
 Norman JE, Hepatology 18:790, 1993


http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hep.1840180407/abstract

=============================
 
( This is one of the many articles which directed me to numerous "Peer Reviewed" Medical Journal Articles stating and confirming the "Hepatitis C epidemic among VietNam Era Veterans, especially veterans from the period at end of the War. )

"Prevalence of Hepatitis C (HCV)Among Military Retirees and Veterans"
 ( numerous reference sources)

 http://hcvets.com/data/military/PrevalenceVets.htm

==================================

"Chronic Mycoplasmal Infections in Gulf War Veterans' Children and Autism Patients ..... Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia Syndrome and Gulf War Illnesses."

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&ved=0CHQQFjAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.greatplainslaboratory.com%2Fhome%2Feng%2FPhysicianReference3.pdf&ei=bVLtUqL7DMqwygH1g4HoAQ&usg=AFQjCNGxR6ss7qbCqMw3F1JT-B8W_W0uew&sig2=3SVw7_WPdUXppuTubd9d8Q&bvm=bv.60444564,d.b2I


Offline Outer Haven

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,946
I heard the story of a guy who got depression and was recommended some autism pills -- he said once he took them, he fell into some kind of psychadelic trance, and it wouldn't go away for 6 months...

Figures.
"If this is the only way, we have no choice but to proceed. What is there to vacillate about?"