Since I see you just bumped this let me throw in some little more info here cause I have so much proof that it will make your head spin.
Their Motto: ‘If you can’t male it fake it’
Can't believe people still buy this shit.
Remember: "The temperature during the Apollo missions were recorded as being between -180F in the shade to an incredible +200F in full Sunshine
155.22Kelvin= -117.78ºC= -180FahrenheitHow Stanley Kubrick Faked the Apollo Moon Landings: Or How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Lies. http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2009/10/how-faking-the-moon-landings-nearly-cost-stanley-kubrick-his-marriage-and-his-life-1.html
Jay Weidner – Kubrick’s Odyssey & The Brotherhood of Saturn, 6 March 2011, (Red Ice Radio) http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2011/03/RIR-110306.php
Stanley Kubrick Filmed Fake Moon Footage http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bud6MscVnp8
See also Capricorn One (1978) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077294/Moon rock' given to Holland by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin is fake
29 August 2009
, (The Telegraph)http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.htmlA moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. “The point of the fake Moonlandings”
The risk of the failure was to big. Also remeber we’re in the middle of the cold war with the Russians here while the Russians already had the spoetnik back from space
and Yuri Gagarin completed an orbit of the Earth on 12 April 1961. Than you have the heavy radiation of the Van Allen Belt which a human being can’t survive without heavy shielding which was technical impossible.
Very compelling evidende of the fake Moonlanding http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_WxiIdRsIc
Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE56F5MK20090716In western Australia during the live broadcast of the Apollo 11 moon landing, several people saw a very unusual occurrence. One viewer, Una Ronald watched the telecast and was astonished with what she saw
The residents of Honeysuckle Creek, Australia, actually saw a different broadcast to the rest of the World. Just shortly before Armstrong stepped onto the Moons surface, a change could be seen where the picture goes from a stark black to a brighter picture. Honeysuckle Creek stayed with the picture and although the voice transmissions were broadcast from Goldstone, the actual film footage was broadcast from Australia. As Una watched Armstrong walking on the surface of the Moon she spotted a Coke bottle that was kicked in the right hand side of the picture
. This was in the early hours of the morning and she phoned her friends to see if they had seen the same thing, unfortunately they had missed it but were going to watch the rebroadcast the next day. Needless to say, the footage had been edited and the offending Coke bottle had been cut out of the film. But several other viewers had seen the bottle and many articles appeared in The West Australian newspaper. I asked the Japanese personaly in an direct e-mail if they could find any wreckage of any Apollo mission with their JAXA satellite closely orbiting (cause the Moon has only 17% of earths gravity) the Moon.
Their answer DIREXT QUOTE: “We estimate that it would be difficult to distinguish any wreckage of Apollo mission with the accuracy cameras onboard the KAGUYA”
Now look at this: Japanese SELENE (Kaguya) Lunar Mission Spots Apollo 15 Landing Site (Images) http://www.universetoday.com/15579/japanese-selene-kaguya-lunar-mission-spots-apollo-15-landing-site-images/
"The Japanese lunar mission SELENE (Selenological and Engineering Explorer), also known as “Kaguya” has imaged the “halo” left behind in the lunar surface from Apollo 15′s lunar module engine exhaust plume.
"SELENE’s Terrain Camera (TC) is continuing to reconstruct a 3D view of the region in unprecedented high-resolution
But wait O minute http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOdzhQS_MMw
Wasn't there soppose to be somtin under that 'blast'? And if it left sucha 'halo' wouldn't the camera be affected? (Not to mention the fact who's panning the camera so perfectly framing the take-off scene?)Here is a study by analyst Jack White. He has studied this moon landing hoax more than anyone. http://www.firetown.com/blog/2011/03/21/my-husband-directed-the-fake-moon-landing-says-stanley-kubricks-widow/
Here, he puts it to the math test to show the impossibility of what NASA is asking us to believe. I visited several official NASA websites to find HOW MANY PHOTOS WERE TAKEN on the surface of the Moon. Amazingly, NASA AVOIDS THIS SUBJECT almost entirely. Two days of searching documents and text were fruitless. But Lunar Surface Journal, one of the sites, lists every photo with its file number. So I undertook to make an actual count of every photo taken by astronauts DURING EXTRA-VEHICULAR ACTIVITY (EVA), the time spent on the surface out of the LEM.
Or, to put it more simply:
Apollo 11……..one photo every 15 seconds Apollo 12……..one photo every 27 seconds Apollo 14……..one photo every 62 seconds Apollo 15……..one photo every 44 seconds Apollo 16……..one photo every 29 seconds Apollo 17……..one photo every 26 seconds
So you decide. Given all the facts, was it possible to take that many photos in so short a time?
Any professional photographer will tell you it cannot be done. Virtually every photo was a different scene or in a different place, requiring travel. As much as 30 miles travel was required to reach some of the photo sites. Extra care had to be taken shooting some stereo pairs and panoramas. Each picture was taken without a viewfinder, using manual camera settings, with no automatic metering, while wearing a bulky spacesuit and stiff clumsy gloves.The agency wants the world to believe that 5771 photographs were taken in 4834 minutes! IF NOTHING BUT PHOTOGRAPHY HAD BEEN DONE, such a feat is clearly impossible…made even more so by all the documented activities of the astronauts. Imagine…1.19 photos every minute that men were on the Moon – that’s one picture every 50 SECONDS!
”The Masonic Moon Landing Hoax http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2008/06/masonic-moon-landing-hoax.html
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.” -Adolf Hitler
Hitler said, “great liars are also great magicians,” and “the great masses of the people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one.” Hitler actually described “The Big Lie” in his book “Mein Kampf” as a propaganda technique. He said the lie must be “so colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.” 16 years later, Hitler’s propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels wrote in a Jan. 12th, 1941 article called “Churchill’s Lie Factory,” that, “The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.” He is also quoted saying, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, the people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Werner von Braun never admitted the Moon landing hoax, but just before he died in an interview with Carol Rosin, he said that in order to sustain the military-industrial complex, first they had created the “Cold War” threat. Once that veil was lifted, a false “terrorist” threat would be created and propagated to the public. Once that was seen through they would create a false asteroid threat
to be dealt with in an “Armageddon” military-industrial manner. Then their last card is to stage a fake alien invasion using their classified anti-gravity “UFO” technology.Look folks you can all fool yourselves cause your whole paradime would be shattered and you would lay down and cry mammie ... not me. I can handle the truth.