$15,OOO,OOO,OOO,OOO FRAUD EXPOSED in UK House of Lords - listen to this

[Jordan]

http://youtu.be/oAK5xzEYq7I

$15 TRILLION is equivalent to the the federal debt of the U.S. Treasury Department. Lord James of Blackheath has spoken in the House of Lords holding evidence of three transactions of 5 Trillion each and a transaction of 750,000 metric tonnes of gold and has called for an investigation.

I think there are three possible conclusions that may come from it. I think there may have been a massive piece of money laundering committed by a major government which ought to know better and that it has effectively undermined the integrity of the British bank the Royal Bank of Scotland, in doing so. The second alternative is that a major American department has an agency that has gone rogue on it because it has been wound up and has created a structure out of which they are seeking to get at least 50 billion Euros as a payoff. And the third possibility is that this is an extraordinarily elaborate fraud which has not been carried out but which has been prepared in order to provide a threat to one government or more if they don't pay them off. So there are three possibilities and this all needs a very urgent review.

My Lords, it starts in April and May of 2009, with the alleged transfer to the United Kingdom, to HSBC of a sum of 5 trillion dollars and seven days later, in comes another 5 trillion dollars to HSBC, and then 3 weeks later another 5 trillion. 5 trillion in each case. Sorry. A total of 15 trillion dollars is alleged to have been passed into the hands of HSBC for onward transit to the Royal Bank of Scotland and we need to look at where this came from and what the history of this money is. And I have been trying to sort out the sequence by which this money has been created and from where it has come from for a long time.

[adissenter2]

lets us see if the "release the ninjas" guy reports on this

[SUPREMEMASTER]

16 Feb 2012 : Column 1016

5.20 pm

Lord James of Blackheath: My Lords, I hope the minute that that has taken has not come off my time. I do not wish noble Lords to get too encouraged when I start with my conclusions but I will not sit down when I have made them. I will then give the evidence to support them and, I hope, present the reasons why I want support for an official inquiry into the mischief I shall unfold this afternoon. I have been engaged in pursuit of this issue for nearly two years and I am no further forward in getting to the truth.

There are three possible conclusions which may come from it. First, there may have been a massive piece of money-laundering committed by a major Government who should know better. Effectively, it undermined the integrity of a British bank, the Royal Bank of Scotland, in doing so. The second possibility is that a major American department has an agency which has gone rogue on it because it has been wound up and has created a structure out of which it is seeking to get at least €50 billion as a pay-off. The third possibility is that this is an extraordinarily elaborate fraud, which has not been carried out, but which has been prepared to provide a threat to one Government or more if they do not make a pay-off. These three possibilities need an urgent review.

In April and May 2009, the situation started with the alleged transfer of $5 trillion to HSBC in the United Kingdom. Seven days later, another $5 trillion came to HSBC and three weeks later another $5 trillion. A total of $15 trillion is alleged to have been passed into the hands of HSBC for onward transit to the Royal Bank of Scotland. We need to look to where this came from and the history of this money. I have been trying to sort out the sequence by which this money has been created and where it has come from for a long time.

It starts off apparently as the property of Yohannes Riyadi, who has some claims to be considered the richest man in the world. He would be if all the money that was owed to him was paid but I have seen some accounts of his showing that he owns $36 trillion in a bank. It is a ridiculous sum of money. However, $36 trillion would be consistent with the dynasty from which he comes and the fact that it had been effectively the emperors of Indo-China in times gone by. A lot of that money has been taken away from him, with his consent, by the American Treasury over the years for the specific purpose of helping to support the dollar.

Mr Riyadi has sent me a remarkable document dated February 2006 in which the American Government have called him to a meeting with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which is neither the Federal Reserve nor a bank. It is a bit like "Celebrity Big Brother". It has three names to describe it and none of them is true. This astonishing document purports to have been a meeting, which was witnessed by Mr Alan Greenspan, who signed for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of which he was chairman, as well as chairman of the real Federal Reserve in Washington. It is signed by Mr Timothy Geithner as a witness on behalf of the International Monetary Fund. The IMF sent two witnesses, the other being Mr Yusuke Horiguchi. These gentlemen have signed as witnesses to the effect

16 Feb 2012 : Column 1017

that this deal is a proper deal. There are a lot of other signatures on the document. I do not have a photocopy; I have an original version of the contract.

Under the contract, the American Treasury has apparently got the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to offer to buy out the bonds issued to Mr Riyadi to replace the cash which has been taken from him over the previous 10 years. It is giving him $500 million as a cash payment to buy out worthless bonds. That is all in the agreement and it is very remarkable. Establishing whether I have a correct piece of paper is just two phone calls away-one to Mr Geithner and one to Mr Greenspan, both of whom still prosper and live. They could easily confirm whether they signed it. Mr Riyadi, by passing these bonds over, has also put at the disposal of the US Treasury the entire asset backing which he was alleged to have for the $15 trillion. I have a letter from the Bank of Indonesia which says that the whole thing was a pack of lies. He did not have the 750,000 tonnes of gold which was supposed to be backing it; he had only 700 tonnes. This is a piece of complete fabrication.

Finally, I have a letter from Mr Riyadi himself, who tells me that he was put up to do this, that none of it is true, and that he has been robbed of all his money. I am quite prepared to recognise that one of the possibilities is that Mr Riyadi is himself putting this together as a forgery in order to try to win some recovery. But it gets more complicated than that because each of the $5 trillion payments that came in has been acknowledged and receipted by senior executives at HSBC and again receipted by senior executives at the Royal Bank of Scotland. I have a set of receipts for all of this money. Why would any bank want to file $5 trillion-worth-$15 trillion in total-of receipts if the money did not exist? The money was first said to have come from the Riyadi account to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and from there it was passed to JP MorganChase in New York for onward transit to London. The means of sending it was a SWIFT note which, if it was genuine, ought to have been registered with the Bank of England.

When this came about, I took it to my noble friend Lord Strathclyde and asked what we should do with it. He said, "Give it to Lord Sassoon. He is the Treasury". So I did, and my noble friend Lord Sassoon looked at it and said immediately, "This is rubbish. It is far too much money. It would stick out like a sore thumb and you cannot see it in the Royal Bank of Scotland accounts". He went on to say, "The gold backing it is ridiculous. Only 1,507 tonnes of gold has been mined in the history of the world, so you cannot have 750,000 tonnes". That is true. The third thing he said was, "It is a scam", and I agree with him. The problem is that at that point we stopped looking, but we should have asked what the scam was instead of just nodding it off.

We have never resolved it. Today, I have this quite frightening piece of paper, which is my justification for bringing it into this meeting. It is available on the internet and I am astonished that it has not already been unearthed by the Treasury because every alarm bell in the land should be ringing if it has. It is from the general audit office of the Federal Reserve in Washington-the real Federal Reserve-and its audit

16 Feb 2012 : Column 1018

review to the end of July 2010 on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. It has on it some 20 banks listed to which $16.115 trillion is outstanding in loans. That is the sore thumb that was being looked for by my noble friend Lord Sassoon. But more particularly there are two other interesting things. The first is that Barclays Bank has $868 billion of loan, and the Royal Bank of Scotland has $541 billion, in which case one has to ask a question, because they could have earned back in three weeks their entire indebtedness and could pay off the taxpayers of Britain. Why have they not done so and could we please ask them to put a cheque in the post tonight for the whole $46 billion?

The next thing that is wrong with it is that every bank on this list, without exception, is an MTN-registered bank, which means that they are registered to use medium-term notes to move funds between themselves with an agreed profit-share formula, in which case these banks are investing this money and, most extraordinarily, not a penny of interest does the Federal Bank of New York want paid on that vast amount, $16 trillion. Anyone who knows what the IMF rules are will immediately smell a rat. The IMF has very strict rules for validating dodgy money. There are two ways of doing it. You either pass it through a major central bank like the Bank of England, which apparently refused to touch this, or you put it through an MTN-trading bank, which is then able to use the funds on the overnight European MTN trading market where they can earn between 1 per cent and 2.5 per cent profit per night. The compound interest on that sum is huge. If it is genuine, a vast profit is being made on this money somewhere.

I believe that this is now such an important issue that I have put everything that I have got on the subject on to a 104-megabyte memory thumb. I want the Government to take it all, put it to some suitable investigative bureau and find out the truth of what is going on here, because something is very seriously wrong. Either we have a huge amount of tax uncollected on profits made or we have a vast amount of money festering away in the European banking system which is not real money, in which case we need to take it back. I ask for an investigation and for noble Lords to support my plea.

5.30 pm

[SUPREMEMASTER]

Oh and did I mention that this is IMPORTANT?

[InsideJob]

Previous thread:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=228673.msg1343731#msg1343731

[Jordan]

What a coincidence, The U.S. national debt is.... 15 trillion dollars, Now where have I heard that figure recently?




The Debt to the Penny and Who Holds It

( Debt Held by the Public vs. Intragovernmental Holdings )
Current    Debt Held by the Public    Intragovernmental Holdings    Total Public Debt Outstanding
02/22/2012   10,656,161,387,513.97   4,760,162,256,532.79   15,416,323,644,046.76

See information on the Debt Subject to the Limit.
Daily History Search Application

To find the total public debt outstanding on a specific day or days, simply select a single date or date range and click on the 'Find History' button.

The data on total public debt outstanding is available daily from 01/04/1993 through 02/22/2012. The debt held by the public versus intragovernmental holdings data is available:

    Yearly (on a fiscal basis) from 09/30/1997 through 02/22/2012.
    Monthly from 09/30/01 through 03/31/05
    Daily from 03/31/05 through 02/22/2012


http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np

[Jordan]

FT takes a shot at Lord James

Urgent sovereign action required
Posted by Paul Murphy on Feb 22 16:27.

No, not sovereign debt or something even vaguely related. We’re talking here about input from Her Majesty The Queen.

Consider Lord James of Blackheath, speaking in the House of Lords last week…

Now, if you are too time-pressed to watch the video, the story in a line or so is that Lord James has happened across a chap called Yohannes Riyadi, who is/was the richest man in the world with $36 trillion dollars and now he may or may not have been ripped off by HSBC and RBS and the Fed and JP Morgan Chase and the IMF and even FT Alphaville, maybe.

But watch the vid.  It’s priceless.

Now, if you conduct some deep dive research, like typing “Yohannes Riyadi” into Google, you find this on the website of the New York Fed:

    Scam Involving Yohannes Riyadi and/or Wilfredo Saurin November 2007

    The Federal Reserve is aware of a fraudulent scam involving individuals using the names Yohannes Riyadi and/or Wilfredo Saurin, or persons claiming to be representatives of these two men. In a typical version of this scam, Mr. Riyadi and/or his delegates falsely claim that they have on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York several U.S. Treasury Checks issued to Mr. Riyadi amounting to billions of dollars.

    The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has been contacted by several brokers and financial institutions worldwide inquiring about the validity of this fraudulent account documentation, which is being offered as collateral for lines of credit or other types of asset based financing. The fraudulent scheme includes multiple documents which purport to have the signatures of various Federal Reserve officials, including Chairman Ben Bernanke.

    In some instances, individuals involved in this fraudulent scheme claim to have met with Federal Reserve officials and claim to have verified that the alleged account is in order. We have also learned that the fraud may include the purchase of certain documents by the introducing brokers.

    If you have information regarding this fraud please contact either Robert Amenta, Special Investigator at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or Erik Rosenblatt, Senior Special Agent at the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

But if you needed to do that deep dive research, you shouldn’t be reading this website. BECAUSE YOU WOULD HAVE KNOWN INSTINCTIVELY THAT THE “MAN WORTH $36 TRILLION” DOESN’T EXIST.

We’d like to think this was just a Pastorini moment for David James. He was, after all, a fearsomely effective company doctor in his prime.

But James’ prime time is now past. Before Xmas he was claiming to have got Lord Sassoon of the Treasury hooked up with something called Foundation X, which was going to pay off a good lump of HM Debt.

We wish…

So we’ve checked with the authorities. James can only be removed from the House of Lords by an Act of Parliament or on the Orders of Her Majesty. The last time that happened was the back end of WWI, when certain Peers of the Realm thought it might be fun to side with the Germans.

Apparently, in modern times, when a member’s mental facilities fade, it is much more common for family members to convince the afflicted peer to take a permanent leave of absence from the House.

Failing that, urgent sovereign action is now required.

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2012/02/22/892601/urgent-sovereign-action-required/

[Jordan]

Lord James of Blackheath, Speech on Foundation X (House of Lords, 01/11/2010)




http://youtu.be/QaA-5_IjkeE

[jerryweaver]

Raye over at Rumormillnews said this Lord Blackheath is being used  to create a sideshow.  I kinda believe her. Blackheath is probably telling the truth that he knows.

Nomi Prins http://www.nomiprins.com/

Prins has been on infowars talking about GAO actual figures regarding the 700+ trillion derivatives bubble.

That fraud is about fifty times bigger than Lord Blackheaths exposure.

These Gigantic numbers boggle the average persons ability to compute.

I think this headline says it all.
Congress: We are insane to let these people even assemble
http://ppjg.me/2012/02/22/congress-we-are-insane-to-let-these-people-even-assemble/

[kmman1987]

F#$@ man. Spreading this sh@t far and wide!!!

I know all this sh@t is going on, but how the hell does this not go viral?

[jerryweaver]

Nomi Prins - Why the Banks Should Be Made Much Smaller

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qIUVP07F44

F#$@ man. Spreading this sh@t far and wide!!!

I know all this sh@t is going on, but how the hell does this not go viral?

To answer that very good question:
 Nomi Prins uses Russian proverb "When money talks the truth is silent"

[jesqueal]

This one's a scam unfortunately.

Various copies of credit documents in the name of this Riyadi http://pppkingdom.wordpress.com/2011/06/17/bill-hayward-johannes-riyadi-hsbc-london-1t-pof/



http://www.ny.frb.org/banking/frscams.html "The Federal Reserve is aware of a fraudulent scam involving individuals using the names Yohannes Riyadi and/or Wilfredo Saurin, or persons claiming to be representatives of these two men. In a typical version of this scam, Mr. Riyadi and/or his delegates falsely claim that they have on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York several U.S. Treasury Checks issued to Mr. Riyadi amounting to billions of dollars.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has been contacted by several brokers and financial institutions worldwide inquiring about the validity of this fraudulent account documentation, which is being offered as collateral for lines of credit or other types of asset based financing. The fraudulent scheme includes multiple documents which purport to have the signatures of various Federal Reserve officials, including Chairman Ben Bernanke."



"The Federal Reserve is aware of several scams involving high denomination Federal Reserve notes and bonds, often in denominations of 100 million or 500 million dollars, dating back to the 1930s, usually 1934. In each of these schemes, fraudulent instruments are claimed to be part of a long-lost supply of recently discovered Federal Reserve notes or bonds."



Those Japanese guys caught with $134billion http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a62_boqkurbI   
The "facilitator" of the proposed "sale" has an open case against the UN, the Trilateral Commission and the Vatican (no shit). http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/05/41930.htm
Other "facilitators" of the deal - Benhjamin Fulford and Leo Zagami who have been thoroughly discredited on this board and others.
This was another scam involving the 1934 Fed bonds.


The 1934 bond scam has been repeated a few times. In some cases it's supposed to be the money of the old Dragon Syndicate / tongs (Fulford flavour scam). In some it's the money of Yohannes Riyadi. In others it's the "Office of International Treasury Control" aka Project X from Lord James' previous speech. Check out how many countries have been hit with this scam http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_International_Treasury_Control