PrisonPlanet Forum
May 18, 2013, 06:01:20 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: *Last GOP debate before super Tuesday: RON PAUL WAS ON FIRE! MSM Agrees he won!  (Read 3815 times)
tritonman
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,256



« on: February 22, 2012, 06:31:38 PM »

http://www.cnn.com/video/?/tab/live#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1
Logged
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2012, 08:40:42 PM »

Live blog: GOP candidates spar in Arizona debate
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/02/gop-presidential-debate-live-romney-santorum-/1
By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY
Updated 10:02 p.m. ET

We live blogged the 20th GOP presidential debate, held in Arizona ahead of Tuesday's primaries there and in Michigan.

It was the first time Rick Santorum was center-stage as the national polling leader, and his three rivals hit him on issues such as earmarks, his record on federal spending, and changing his position on the No Child Left Behind law.

Santorum, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul also sparred over immigration, the government's bailout of the auto industry and what to do about nuclear weapons development in Iran.

USA TODAY's Susan Page and Jackie Kucinich will have complete coverage in Thursday's editions. Follow highlights from the live blog by scrolling down:

9:56 p.m. ET

Santorum says the biggest misconception about him is the notion that he can't beat Obama. "People are looking for someone who can do a lot with a little," he says. "We've got the programs, the plans and we can win and defeat Barack Obama and govern this country."

That ends the 20th presidential debate.

9:53 p.m. ET

Gingrich says he wishes the American people could know about the amount of work it took for him to get welfare reform through Congress.

Romney says it's time to "restore America's promise" and calls for "fundamental change" in Washington. He says he's going to answer the question the way he wants it, choosing to ignore what is the biggest misconception about him.

"I believe I have the passion, commitment and the skills to turn America around," he says.

9:50 p.m. ET

The debate is wrapping up. CNN's John King asks: What is the biggest misconception about you?

Paul says it's the "perpetuation of the myth by the media that I can't win." He says he doesn't hear that from his supporters.

9:46 p.m ET

Paul says there is no authority in the Constitution for the government to be involved in educaton. He turns his attention Santorum's answer, saying it's wrong to "go along to get along." Paul says you don't take "an oath of the party," it's an oath to uphold the Constitution.

9:45 p.m. ET

Romney says No Child Left Behind needs some changing, but praises Bush for standing up to the teachers' unions and trying to implement school choice for parents.

Gingrich says charter schools are a step in the right direction, on the larger issue of what is the proper role for government in education. "I would urge states to return most of the power back to the parents." he says.

9:42 p.m. ET

An audience member asks about No Child Left Behind and education policy. Santorum says he supported the law even though it was "against the principles I believed in."

"I made a mistake," he said, explaining he "took one for the team" because it was the principal policy advocated by President George W. Bush. Santorum advocates both the federal government and the states should get out of education and let parents decide what to do. He home schools his kids.

9:40 p.m. ET

Paul makes the case that there is an economic argument against going to war, as well as the moral and constitutional arguments. "I'm going to win this argument for economic reasons," he says.

9:39 p.m. ET

Romney says he agrees with Gingrich and Santorum on Syria and Iran. "Syria has a leader that's in real trouble. We ought to grab that like the best thing we've ever seen," suggesting Americans need to help get rid of the Assad regime.

9:36 p.m. ET

Gingrich says the first thing he'd do is create a new energy policy, as a way to deal with oil-producing countries. "You have to set the stage of not being afraid of what will happen in the region," he says.

"This is an administration that as long as you're America's enemy, you're safe," Gingrich says.

9:34 p.m. ET

The topic is now what to do about the situation in Syria. Santorum blasts the "timidness" of Obama, and he talks about Syria, Iraq and Iran as an "axis." He says Syria is a "puppet state" of Iran.

"He's afraid to stand up to Iran," Santorum says about Obama. "He isn't going to stop them from getting a nuclear weapon. We need a new president or we will have a cataclysmic situation."

9:33 p.m. ET

Paul disagrees with his rivals. "There is no evidence" that Iran has a nuclear weapon, he says. "We do not have proof they have a weapon."

"We're ready to go to war. I say going to war rapidly like this is risky and it's reckless," Paul says, arguing that if the Iran situation is that important then go to Congress and ask for a formal declaration of war.

9:30 p.m. ET

Santorum says a "very clear message" needs to be sent to Iran about the "seriousness" of the American people that Iran should not develop nuclear weapons. He jokes that if you want to be right on a foreign policy position, do whatever is opposite that Vice President Biden says to do.

9:28 p.m. ET

Romney wants to answer the question on Iran.

"The price of gasoline pales in comparison to Ahmadinejad having nuclear weapons," Romney says, arguing Obama should have placed "crippling" sanctions on Iran.

9:26 p.m. ET

The topic is Iran's nuclear threat. "I do believe there are moments when you pre-empt," Gingrich says.

"You have an absolutely moral obligation to defend the lives of your people" if a "madman" has nuclear weapons, he says.

9:24 p.m. ET

Santorum says there are different roles for women in combat. He explains a comment he made recently that he had "concerns" about the new Pentagon rules. "We should look at the proper roles for everybody in combat," he says.

9:24 p.m. ET

The topic now is an expanded combat role for women in the military. Gingrich says it's more appropriate to ask military leaders in the field about the combat role than the "social engineering" of the Obama administration.

The Pentagon recently unveiled new rules that formally opened thousands of jobs as medics, radio operators, intelligence officers and communications officers in battalions.

9:19 p.m. ET

Describe yourself in one word: Paul says consistent. Santorum says courage. Romney says resolute. Gingrich says cheerful.

9:14 p.m. ET

The question now: Is Florida Sen. Marco Rubio right when he says the GOP needs to change its rhetoric on immigration? Gingrich pivots to how it's difficult to pass a comprehensive immigration bill -- dealing with everything from visas to guest workers and other issues.

9:11 p.m. ET

Santorum says he wouldn't require homeowners to do something like the E-Verify program when hiring household help. He calls for enforcing existing immigration laws, and deporting illegal immigrants here in the United States.

9:09 p.m. ET

Romney is touting the E-Verify system that requires employers to verify the legal status of workers, then suggests Arizona and other states are right for passing their own immigration laws. "The right course for America is to drop these lawsuits against Arizona and other states trying to do the job Barack Obama isn't doing," he says.

9:08 p.m. ET

The camera pans to Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a Gingrich supporter, in the audience. Gingrich is defending the border fence. He says he would finish the fence by January 2014 and ask the border governors to support his efforts, and shift resources from the Department of Homeland Security to the border.

9:05 p.m. ET

An audience member asks the candidates what will they do to secure the border. Paul says a fence along the U.S.-Mexican border is the wrong idea. "Why isn't it trespassing," Paul asks when an illegal immigrant comes across the border.

9:04 p.m. ET

Santorum explains he supported Specter because at the time he was poised to be chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and vowed to support President Bush's judicial nominees. (Specter, who switched from the GOP to the Democratic Party, was defeated in a Democratic primary in 2010.)

"I did the right thing for our country," Santorum says.

9:03 p.m. ET

Santorum finds a way to bring up "Romneycare" -- the Massachusetts health law -- and point out it was the "model for Obamacare." Romney says: "Wait a minute."

Romney shoots back to Santorum: Don't forget you endorsed me four years ago. Then he points out the differences between the Massachusetts bill and the national law. "I will repeal Obamacare," he says.

Romney then essentially blames Santorum for "Obamacare," because Santorum supported Arlen Specter, a moderate who voted for the president's health care legislation.

8:57 p.m. ET

"When you have a government as the central provider of services you inevitably move toward tyranny ... and move towards the coercion of the state," Gingrich says.

Paul makes the point that if a senator -- he means Santorum -- voted for funding for Planned Parenthood then he voted for birth control and voted for abortion. Planned Parenthood is the nation's largest provider of abortions.

Santorum explains he wanted funding for abstinence programs, which Paul says the government shouldn't be doing.

8:53 p.m. ET

Romney says: "We have to have a president who's willing to say that the best opportunity an individual can give their unborn child ... is to be born to a mother and father."

8:52 p.m. ET

Paul, an obstetrician, says birth control pills "can't be blamed for the immorality of our society."

8:50 p.m. ET

Santorum explains what he talked about the "dangers" of contraception. "We're seeing a problem in our culture with respect that children are being raised by children," he says. "Bottom line is: We have a problem in this country and the family is fracturing."

"The left gets all upset: 'Oh, look at him talking about these things,' " Santorum says. "Just because I'm talking about it doesn't mean I want a government program to fix it."

8:47 p.m. ET

Romney says Obama is making attacks on "religious tolerance, religious freedom" as he discusses the new policy requiring insurers of religious-affliated institutions to provide free contraceptives.

"His position on religious tolerance is clear and ... people want a president" who respects the Constitution, he says.

8:46 p.m. ET

The topic is birth control and the question draws boos from the audience. Gingrich jumps in: "There is a legitimate question about the power of the government to impose on religious activities," Gingrich says, before lashing out on the "elite media."

8:40 p.m. ET

Paul says he doesn't like the idea of "good" bailouts and "bad" bailouts.

8:38 p.m. ET

Romney charges that the Obama administration essentially gave Chrysler and GM to "the unions."

Santorum says Romney isn't making an "apples to apples comparison," when he talks about bailouts for the airline industry or the steel industry in the same vein as the assistance for the auto industry.

8:37 p.m. ET

Romney is explaining his support of "managed bankruptcy" for the auto industry. On the Wall Street bailouts, he said he was concerned that if the government didn't intervene, then all banks would go down.

8:35 p.m. ET

We've moved on to the government bailouts of the auto industry. Santorum says he's opposed to government intervention to help an industry. "I felt having the government come in ... and have huge influence on an industry would be damaging," he says, explaining his opposition to the Wall Street bailouts and auto bailouts.

"I believe in markets, not just when they're convenient for me," Santorum says, noting he was more principled than Romney.

8:32 p.m. ET

Paul says the problem with earmarks is Congress itself. "The reason we get into trouble is the irresponsibility of Congress," he says, arguing the best thing to do is "vote against the bill."

8:30 p.m. ET

The exchange on earmarks is getting lively. Santorum says Romney is "not entitled to misrepresent the facts" on earmarks, before advocating a line-item veto for president.

8:29 p.m. ET

Santorum is explaining his stance on earmarks, and slams Romney for doing exactly what Romney is criticizing Santorum for.

Santorum notes Romney asked for earmarks for the Salt Lake City Olympics and as Massachusetts governor.

Romney says he would put a ban on earmarks because "it opens the door on excessive spending."

"The earmark process is broken," he said, while defending his own requests for earmarks. "While I was fighting to save the Olympics, you were fighting to save the Bridge to Nowhere," Romney says as he turns to Santorum.

8:23 p.m. ET

Gingrich suggests Romney is playing "class warfare" with his plan on capital gains. He notes candidates keep talking about "managing the current government" and notes the current government is a "disaster."

8:22 p.m. ET

Romney is explaining his remark at the CPAC conference that he is "severely conservative." He says that means "strict."

"My policies in Massachusetts were conservative," he says, before launching into various policies he promoted and then a discussion of his private-sector record. "You can't be anything but a fiscal conservative in business unless you balance your budget."

8:21 p.m. ET

Paul says it's a "cop out" to compare yourself to others in Congress and notes Congress gets a low job approval rating of 9%. "Conservatives are quite pleased to spending money overseas but if you're a strict fiscal conservative ... you can't be for that kind of stuff," he says.

8:20 p.m ET

Santorum responds by saying The Weekly Standard says he was the "most fiscally conservative" while in Congress. "I was a leader on taking on tough issues," he says, before noting he did all this while representing Pennsylvania and not one of the most conservative districts in Texas.

"We had a strong record in a tough state to be a conservative," Santorum says.

8:18 p.m. ET

Paul explains his new ad hitting Santorum as a "fake" conservative. "Because he's a fake," he says. The Texas congressman says candidates often say they're conservative when they run for office, but do something else when in office.

"I've never voted for a budget deficit. I never voted to increase the national debt," Paul says. "This idea of being fiscally conservative now that we're running for office ... I mean, it loses credibility," Paul says.

8:15 p.m. ET

Romney gets his chance to plug his plan to cut tax rates by 20% across the board, and hits back on Santorum. Gingrich is now responding to Arizona Sen. John McCain's charge that he made earmarks an art form while House speaker.

8:14 p.m. ET

Santorum defends his record, says he wishes he didn't vote for the No Child Left Behind education law. He says look at his record "of never having raised taxes," something he says Romney has done. "I"m going to represent 100% of Americans. We're not raising taxes on anybody.

Romney says Santorum is mischaracterizing his record.

8:13 p.m. ET

Romney points out Santorum voted five times to raise the debt limit, without getting spending cuts. "I've lived balancing budgets," he says, touting his business record.

Romney talks about going through every federal program to look for cuts and ways they can be improved, and then says he'll cut the federal workforce and the pay of federal employees.

8:10 p.m. ET

First question from an audience member: What are you going to do to reduce the debt? Santorum goes first, highlighting his plan to cut $5 trillion from the budget and gets applause for saying he'll repeal "Obamacare." He promises not to cut defense spending.

8:07 p.m. ET

We're doing the customary introductions, and Romney and Gingrich start out by jabbing President Obama.

Updated 8 p.m. ET

Here we go. CNN's John King will moderate.

Our original post begins here:

Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum are locked in a high-stakes battle, especially in Romney's native state of Michigan. A new poll tonight by the Detroit Free Press shows them essentially tied.

Romney is trying to reclaim front-runner status and win over Republicans who aren't convinced of his conservative credentials. After surging in national and statewide polls, Santorum is trying to keep his momentum and show he can take on President Obama in the fall.

Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul will also be participating tonight in the 20th -- and possibly final -- debate in what has been a volatile race for the GOP nomination.

CNN coverage begins at 8 p.m. ET from the Mesa Arts Center.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2012, 08:42:32 PM »

Ron Paul in CNN / Arizona Debate - Last Debate Before Super Tuesday - Live Stream
http://www.dailypaul.com/215514/tomorrow-ron-paul-in-cnn-arizona-debate-open-thread
Submitted by The Daily Paul on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 08:01

CNN and Arizona GOP Debate - 8pm ET

Live Stream: www.cnn.com/video/?/tab/live#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1

Dr. Ron Paul will participate in the CNN / Arizona GOP being held at the Mesa Art Center, Mesa, AZ on Wednesday, February 22nd at 8:00 p.m. ET.

Last debate of the season
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2012, 08:43:29 PM »

Ron Paul Wins CNN Arizona Republican Debate!
http://www.policymic.com/articles/4551/ron-paul-wins-cnn-arizona-republican-debate/category_list
Cameron English

In the final Republican debate before Super Tuesday, and perhaps the last of the race, Texas Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) made quick work of his opponents.

Though not known for his stellar oratory abilities or powerful stage presence, the libertarian gadfly stood out among the remaining candidates during Wednesday night's contest for the same reason he has been able to stay in the race thus far: his consistent and convincing defense of free markets and small government.

Paul opened his time by defending his criticism of Santorum as fake fiscal conservative. In response to CNN moderator John King's question, "Why did you call Senator Santorum a fake fiscal conservative?" Paul quipped, "Because he's a fake!" After the massive applause died down, Paul pointed out that most politicians are fiscal hawks during their campaigns, but they tend to be far less principled once elected. Santorum, who admitted he wouldn't cut defense spending, and supported dozens of federal spending increases while in Congress, perfectly fits this description.

During a slap fight that broke out over earmarks between the frontrunners, Paul was criticized for sending federal money back to his district. Paul rightly pointed out that he earmarks funds for his district because the money would otherwise be spent on wars and bank bailouts by the Executive Branch. Though he prefers the money not be taken from taxpayers in the first place, Paul argued that earmarks ensure that some of the money is sent back to the people who it actually belongs to.

On the auto bailout, Paul argued that all bailouts are economically harmful because they represent legalized theft. "Do we praise bank robbers if they are successful?" As many economists have long argued, Paul pointed out that bailouts save failing businesses at the expense of the rest of the economy, and that letting companies like General Motors fail is necessary if the economy is going to recover.

Should the government be involved in issues like contraception? Paul says no, because that's where the problem arises. Congress legislates morality; people of differing religious persuasions then fight incessantly over whose morality will be the law of the land. Much like abortion or gay marriage, the answer, according to Paul, is to return the decision to use birth control, and the cost of using it, to states and individuals.

The Texas congressman also laid into Santorum for voting for Planned Parenthood while claiming to be a pro-life Senator. Santorum didn't deny the charge, but justified his vote by claiming that he authored legislation that would fund abstinence only education. Paul responded, "There's always an excuse for the spending."

Paul used a question about immigration to criticize our foreign policy of "worrying about the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan." He also claimed that we need to eliminate the incentives, mainly welfare, that encourage people to immigrate to America illegally. Meanwhile, the rest of the candidates argued over how to successfully arrest Mexican immigrants and build big fences along the southern border.

While Santorum, Romney, and Gingrich stuck to the neoconservative line that we have to keep building our military and policing the Middle East, Paul, following a long line of foreign policy experts, explained that we need to stop fighting aggressive wars and consider our role in fostering the rise of violent dictators around the world.

Because our influence in the region, and the fact that Iran doesn't have a nuclear bomb, Paul also claimed that the likelihood of Iran starting a nuclear war is minuscule. He also highlighted the enormous costs of an aggressive foreign policy, citing the Soviets as an example of what happens to countries that overextend themselves abroad.

All of the candidates took reasonable stances on education policy. Each correctly took shots at teacher unions and argued that the federal Department of Education needs to be reformed. But as Paul opined, the other three contenders didn't go far enough. Education should be a state and local issue, a position no other Republican on the stage consistently defended while in office.  

At this point in the race, it's unlikely that Paul will win the Republican nomination, trailing far beyond Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum as he is. But after tonight's debate, the Texas congressman has illustrated why he's the best choice. If Republican voters, supposed conservatives, can't see that, then they deserve the champion of big government that their next president will be.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2012, 08:46:03 PM »

PAUL WAS IN BEAST MODE
http://www.dailypaul.com/215514/tomorrow-ron-paul-in-cnn-arizona-debate-open-thread
Submitted by erbrooks on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 22:41.

He rocked that debate.

Clear issues, sound-bites, consistent, and good marketing-spin. "If you're going to invade Iran, you DECLARE THE WAR!" The only downside was a couple of stuttering moments and a missed rebuttal with Grinch. But he shredded.

And CNN even interviewed him at the end for a few minutes immediately after the debate, and he was ON FREAKIN' FIRE.

Awesome.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2012, 08:48:11 PM »

If you missed the debate...
Submitted by free voice on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 22:39.

if you missed the debate, here is a recorded of the full debate...


Republican Presidential Debate from Arizona, Feb 22, 2012
(recorded at 2012-02-22 19:00:48)

http://livecage.com/?res=root._view_content&content_id=14678

Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2012, 08:52:37 PM »

CNN's Donna Brazile Agrees With Ron Paul
http://www.dailypaul.com/215514/tomorrow-ron-paul-in-cnn-arizona-debate-open-thread
Submitted by im4paul on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 22:36.

The post-debate panel was talking Iran and nukes and Donna said

"I have to say that I agree with Ron Paul."
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 22, 2012, 08:58:19 PM »

Im sure no one else caught
http://www.dailypaul.com/215514/tomorrow-ron-paul-in-cnn-arizona-debate-open-thread
Submitted by crackinhedz on Wed, 02/22/2012 - 22:14.

Im sure no one else caught this, but near the last 10 minutes or so CNN showed a shot of the crowd holding signs, and I paused my DVR and was checking out what the signs said... many Paul signs! But one sign caught my eye, it read: "Frothy" Santorum - Lube + Fecal matter I about died laughing...Im sure many of you already knew the definition of Santorum, but I did not until now. Hilarious. (wish I could have gotten a screen shot!)
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 22, 2012, 09:05:13 PM »

WHO WON THE ARIZONA DEBATE?
http://drudgereport.com

 
PAUL
34%
17,018 votes


 
ROMNEY
31%
15,289 votes

 
SANTORUM
19%
9,492 votes

GINGRICH
15%
7,662 votes

 
49,461 Total Votes
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2012, 02:45:08 AM »

Ron Paul On Santorum During GOP Arizona Debate: “He Is Fake”
http://newsone.com/nation/washington-watch/associatedpress9/ron-paul-on-santorum-during-gop-arizona-debate-he-is-fake/
Written by Associated Press on February 22, 2012 11:50 pm

Santorum, surging in the race, also took his lumps from the audience, which booed when he said he had voted several years ago for the No Child Left Behind education legislation even though he had opposed it. “Look, politics is a team sport, folks,” he said...Texas Rep. Ron Paul chimed in from the side, saying with a smile that Santorum was a fake conservative who had voted for programs that he now says he wants to repeal.

The most animated clash of the evening focused on health care in the United States....Romney said Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator, actually bore responsibility for passage of the health care law that Obama won from a Democratic-controlled Congress in 2010, even though he wasn’t in office at the time. Romney said that in a primary battle in 2004, Santorum had supported then-Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who later switched parties and voted for the law Obama wanted. “He voted for Obamacare. If you had not supported him, if we had said no to Arlen Specter, we would not have Obamacare,” Romney contended.



[Note: out of the 70 sentences, those seven were the only ones fit to reprint (10%) as the rest was CIA/MI6 psychological operations against the minds of men by Rothschild's AP fake news outlet. I guess AP is now giving us 10% truth so that we  do not completely boycott all of their horse crap articles which obviously act as weapons against our very national psyche. And this psyche decides on foreign policy and domestic policy issues, so it can easily be concluded that Rothschild and their yellow rag (a.k.a. the 'Associated Press') are really a National Security threat and we should stop funding their bullshit propaganda with 'military financing to further a military narrative' which  cots us $billions. These activities were exposed by Kucinich in the following shocking congressional hearings: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEpoNdOF1Zw, http://kucinich.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=70646
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
larsonstdoc
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19,499



« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2012, 07:20:29 AM »

Ron Paul On Santorum During GOP Arizona Debate: “He Is Fake”
http://newsone.com/nation/washington-watch/associatedpress9/ron-paul-on-santorum-during-gop-arizona-debate-he-is-fake/
Written by Associated Press on February 22, 2012 11:50 pm

Santorum, surging in the race, also took his lumps from the audience, which booed when he said he had voted several years ago for the No Child Left Behind education legislation even though he had opposed it. “Look, politics is a team sport, folks,” he said...Texas Rep. Ron Paul chimed in from the side, saying with a smile that Santorum was a fake conservative who had voted for programs that he now says he wants to repeal.

The most animated clash of the evening focused on health care in the United States....Romney said Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator, actually bore responsibility for passage of the health care law that Obama won from a Democratic-controlled Congress in 2010, even though he wasn’t in office at the time. Romney said that in a primary battle in 2004, Santorum had supported then-Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who later switched parties and voted for the law Obama wanted. “He voted for Obamacare. If you had not supported him, if we had said no to Arlen Specter, we would not have Obamacare,” Romney contended.



[Note: out of the 70 sentences, those seven were the only ones fit to reprint (10%) as the rest was CIA/MI6 psychological operations against the minds of men by Rothschild's AP fake news outlet. I guess AP is now giving us 10% truth so that we  do not completely boycott all of their horse crap articles which obviously act as weapons against our very national psyche. And this psyche decides on foreign policy and domestic policy issues, so it can easily be concluded that Rothschild and their yellow rag (a.k.a. the 'Associated Press') are really a National Security threat and we should stop funding their bullshit propaganda with 'military financing to further a military narrative' which  cots us $billions. These activities were exposed by Kucinich in the following shocking congressional hearings: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEpoNdOF1Zw, http://kucinich.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=70646

  That was the coolest part of the debate--when Ron Paul said that Santorum is a fake conservative.
Logged
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2012, 11:53:44 PM »

Washington Post Writer's Group: Santorum is a fake, Ron Paul is right!
http://www.vindy.com/news/2012/feb/24/santorum-flip-flops-big-time/?newswatch
Published: Fri, February 24, 2012 @ 12:00 a.m.
Washington Post Writers Group

I was getting ready to write something nice about Rick Santorum. Then Rick Santorum talked me out of it. The nice thing was about the former Pennsylvania senator’s self-described support for Title X, the federally funded family planning program that provides contraceptive services for low-income women.  Santorum has pointed to Title X in explaining his position on contraception: personally opposed but not in favor of imposing that view on others.  Hmmm, impressive. Especially because Mitt Romney has said he would eliminate funding for Title X. This offers evidence that Santorum can separate his personal morality from his public policy stances.  Indeed, after Santorum mega-donor Foster Friess “humorously” suggested that women practice birth control by holding an aspirin between their knees, Santorum defended himself by invoking Title X.  “It’s funny that I’ve been criticized by Governor Romney and by Ron Paul for actually having voted for something called Title X, which is actually federal funding of contraception,” Santorum told CBS’ Charlie Rose. “My public policy beliefs are that this contraception should be available. Again, I’ve supported Title X funding.”  Excellent. Except, here is Santorum, five days later, at the Arizona presidential debate: “As Congressman Paul knows, I opposed Title X funding. I’ve always opposed Title X funding, but it’s included in a large appropriation bill that includes a whole host of other things,” Santorum said.  “What I did, because Title X was always pushed through ... I said, well, if you’re going to have Title X funding, then we’re going to create something called Title XX, which is going to provide funding for abstinence-based programs.”

Speed record
When it comes to flip-flops, this may be a land speed record. If Santorum has “always opposed Title X funding,” you sure can’t tell from his record. His response in the CBS interview wasn’t some stray comment — it’s consistent with what Santorum has been saying on the campaign trail, and for years before.  Santorum in 2006: “From a governmental point of view, I support, you know, Title X ... and have voted for contraception.” At the debate, Romney tried to call Santorum on his about-face. “You didn’t say, ‘This is something I was opposed to; it wasn’t something I would have done,’” Romney noted. “You said this in a positive light, ‘I voted for Title X.’” The notion that this is a black mark on Santorum’s record — the fact that the Arizona audience booed when he began to explain away his vote in favor of Title X — illustrates just how extreme the Republican discourse has become. Requiring religious institutions to spend their own money on contraceptive coverage that violates their moral views is one thing. I thought the Obama administration erred initially when it failed to exempt Catholic hospitals and charities from the requirement.  But opposing a program that prevents unwanted pregnancies — and therefore reduces the number of abortions — is crazy. According to estimates by the Guttmacher Institute, “contraceptive services provided at Title X-supported centers helped prevent 973,000 unintended pregnancies in 2008, which would likely have resulted in 432,600 unintended births and 406,200 abortions.” The case against Title X funding tends to center on the money the program provides to Planned Parenthood, and the group’s simultaneous involvement in performing abortions. “Gov. Romney simply does not believe that federal taxpayer dollars should be used to fund groups that provide abortions or abortion-related services,” campaign spokesman Andrea Saul told me in an email. “This is particularly so during a time of massive budget deficits and out-of-control spending.”

Saving money
This argument makes no sense, even if you accept the contention that federal money somehow helps subsidize Planned Parenthood s abortion services. Less than a quarter of Title X funds — $70 million of $327 million — go to Planned Parenthood. As a matter of fiscal responsibility, this is a smart investment. Preventing unwanted pregnancies saves money.  And if Romney, Santorum et al want to eliminate Title X family planning money, do they also want to zero out Medicaid contraceptive coverage, which amounts to much more than Title X funding (more than $1 billion) and which also goes to Planned Parenthood?  The candidates would do well to heed the advice of a fellow Republican, “We need to take sensationalism out of this topic,” he said. “If family planning is anything, it is a public health matter.” The Republican was George H.W. Bush, then a Texas congressman, arguing for the creation of Title X in 1969. But that was four decades — and a different Republican Party — ago.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Starworz
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4


« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2012, 11:41:54 AM »

No matter how good Ron Paul gets, he'll never make great gains because he's too good.  What corporation would allow his progress?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!