|
Dig
|
 |
« on: January 02, 2012, 03:31:02 PM » |
|
Iowa GOP Plans Vote Fraud In a blatantly transparent attempt to steal the election from Ron Paul, the Iowa GOP moves to hide the site of vote tabulation and reporting from public eyes.http://www.nolanchart.com/article9216-iowa-gop-plans-ron-paul-defeat-via-vote-fraud.htmlby creator (libertarian) Monday, January 2, 2012 Today is the eve of the the Iowa Caucus, the first major tabulation of the will of Americans as to who they want in the White House next year. Not even mainstream media can hide the fact that citizens in Iowa are utterly fed-up with the Big Government candidates pushed by the GOP establishment.And so it is no surprise to me that the GOP is transparently moving to steal this election from the only candidate who represents any real difference from the anointed "tax and spend" crop of political "leaders;" namely, Ron Paul, Republican presidential front-runner. Politico has reported that the Iowa GOP intends to move the vote-count to an 'undisclosed location'. The move was telegraphed even earlier by an Associated Press article that speaks of "an apparent threat from a notorious collective of computer hackers" with only vague references to any source. You may not be a rocket scientist, but I hope it is OBVIOUS to you that ANY kind of "voting process" that hides or in any way obscures the counting of votes is patently nothing more than a plan to manipulate the outcome of an election. Whether you still believe in the democratic electoral process, or like myself, have moved on to more positive direct action, I pray you still maintain some modicum of righteous indignation over such a blatantly transparent intention to invalidate an honest polling of the will of the people. Just in case you care to express your outrage at such blatant vote fraud, you can find contact information for the Iowa GOP by simply googling 'contact information for Iowa GOP.' Why not give them a piece of your mind!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
kita
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2012, 03:36:52 PM » |
|
They are going to steal this vote,and the reason why they are still telling people through the PMD (prostitute media)that other candidates are still in the race,when they are not.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
American journalist, A. J. Liebling, who said: "Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dig
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2012, 11:47:12 PM » |
|
Note: This is BS advice, the thing that needs to be done is to video, document everything in the 99 separate precincts. POLL: Rest easy Ron Paul detractors, Iowa GOP won’t let him winhttp://libertymaven.com/2012/01/03/poll-rest-easy-ron-paul-detractors-iowa-gop-wont-let-him-win/12083/January 3rd, 2012 1:18 am | by Marc Gallagher | Published in Activism, Caucus, Election, Liberty, Politics, Polling, Ron Paul | 0 Iowans, there is no need for you to caucus tonight. It seems that new information has come out that suggests your effort to support the candidate of your choice does not matter at all. The Iowa GOP leaders will decide the winner, not you. So, go ahead and snuggle up in front of your TV’s and wait for your almighty GOP leaders to tell you the winner. And since it would be so embarrassing for a candidate to win that actually believes in and follows his oath to the Constitution unlike any of the other candidates… you don’t have to fret about Ron Paul winning. They won’t let him. The only question is will the party bosses side with Willard “Sideburns” Romney or will they be eating a giant plate of frothy Santorum Salad on caucus night? Or will they even conspire to have Ron Paul finish in 3rd behind both or worse?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
Dig
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2012, 11:53:47 PM » |
|
HOW TO MAKE SURE IOWA FAKE GOP (BUT REAL NAZIS) DO NOT COMMIT TREASON WHEN COUNTING VOTES IN THE STAR CHAMBER BlackBox Voting: Iowa Voting Integrityhttp://www.dailypaul.com/198894/blackbox-voting-iowa-voting-integritySubmitted by LibertyBaby on Mon, 01/02/2012 - 20:46 Message from blackboxvoting.org Link to full article: http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/8/81796.htmlPermission to reprint this or full article granted, with link to http://www.blackboxvoting.orgWHAT TO DO IN IOWA: 1) Check that the number of people who vote does not exceed the number of people who attend the caucus; 2) Check that the number of votes counted does not exceed the number of people who voted; 3) Use your cell phone to capture a photo or video of the local caucus result, as evidence. It doesn't matter what you say happened; only a photo or video matters. Compare this with the state party's report of your local caucus report to make sure it's the same. 4) Make sure the state party promptly provides the result of each local caucus together with the total. 5) Check that the sum of all the local caucuses adds up to the total reported by the state party. ___ In Iowa, a little cooperation from the state committee, a reasonable amount of vigilance from the caucus attendees and the campaigns, and you've got a transparent process. Not so in New Hampshire, at least, as of this writing. Stay tuned. Brad Friedman at Bradblog.com reports on some key procedures in the 2012 Iowa Republican caucus. At issue is just how transparent and public the process is, and whether there are any holes in the cheese. Fewer holes than 2008, it seems. A bit of diligence on the part of caucus participants will be needed. http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9023 There is also some consternation from concerned citizens about a recent Politico.com story, which reports that the Iowa statewide caucus counting will be moved to an undisclosed location, its author chiding those who question the transparency behind such a move as "conspiracy minded types." http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2011/12/iowa-gop-explains-moving-vote-tabulation-away-from-108962.htmlTo be clear about this, insisting on transparency is a necessary and patriotic element of running any public election, and ridiculing public citizens who examine transparency is kind of embarrassing. For the reporter. Not the citizens.
The truth is, the counting process, even if it is moved to a secret location, will not destroy transparency if the five steps above are followed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
Dig
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2012, 11:55:36 PM » |
|
WHAT TO DO IN IOWA:
1) Check that the number of people who vote does not exceed the number of people who attend the caucus;
2) Check that the number of votes counted does not exceed the number of people who voted;
3) Use your cell phone to capture a photo or video of the local caucus result, as evidence. It doesn't matter what you say happened; only a photo or video matters. Compare this with the state party's report of your local caucus report to make sure it's the same.
4) Make sure the state party promptly provides the result of each local caucus together with the total.
5) Check that the sum of all the local caucuses adds up to the total reported by the state party.
The truth is, the counting process, even if it is moved to a secret location, will not destroy transparency if the five steps above are followed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
Dig
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2012, 12:02:00 AM » |
|
Iowa GOP explains moving vote tabulation away from HQhttp://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2011/12/iowa-gop-explains-moving-vote-tabulation-away-from-108962.htmlBy JONATHAN MARTIN | 12/28/11 7:28 PM EST Iowa GOP chair Matt Strawn was largely mum when I asked yesterday about a tip I got that the state party was moving the vote-tabulation away from their headquarters to an "undisclosed location." But after the Iowa GOP HQ was flooded today with questions from Ron Paul backers and conspiracy-minded types about why the Republicans were compiling the votes from the state's 99 counties in private, the state party's executive director confirmed that they were going off-site and said it was only to avoid a sabotage. "The Party is simply moving off-site in the event that protesters or others attempt to disrupt the reporting process by cutting phone lines, etc," said party ED Chad Olsen. He added: "Every vote is counted. Every vote is reported. The vote-counting process is carried out in public."A full Olsen explainer on how the caucus votes are tallied in the individual precincts after the jump Caucus goers assemble in their individual precincts. There are 1774 in Iowa.When the time comes for the Presidential preference poll, individuals are allowed to speak and advocate for a candidate. At the conclusion of speeches, slips of paper are handed out and people write down their choice for candidate. Those slips are collected, taken to a table, and counted in the open, with campaign representatives allowed to stand directly around the tabulator counting the votes. In the presence of everyone, the vote totals are announced and recorded on an official form provided by the Republican Party of Iowa. This form is signed by two separate caucus officials who were previously elected by the members of the assembled body.
One person is designated to report the results to the Party, again in the presence of campaign representatives for verification, so that results can be aggregated and shared with the media in a timely manner. A high-level campaign representative is also present at the Party office where precinct results are being aggregated.
Those same campaign representatives on the ground in all 1774 precincts are able to “check” the results being reported in the media against their own observations in that precinct. If a discrepancy were to appear, the can alert both their respective campaign as well as the Party.
Every vote is counted. Every vote is reported. The vote-counting process is carried out in public.[Here is the bullshit...]
The Party is simply moving off-site in the event that protesters or others attempt to disrupt the reporting process by cutting phone lines, etc. The Party staff does not actually "count" any of the votes, as that process takes place at the actual caucus sites. The Party’s primary responsibilities caucus night include assembling precinct results for the media and staffing hotline numbers for our thousands of volunteers who are conducting the caucuses in their individual precincts January 3. Taking care of those responsibilities at a location other than our regular offices is simply a precaution to insure that volunteers are able to call for assistance if necessary, and that results can be reported as quickly as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
Dig
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2012, 12:03:55 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
Dig
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2012, 12:07:42 AM » |
|
KURT NIMMO EXPOSES COINTELPRO IN IOWA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Is COINTELPRO Effort Underway to Sabotage Ron Paul in Iowa? http://www.infowars.com/is-cointelpro-effort-underway-to-sabotage-ron-paul-in-iowa/Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com January 2, 2012 As should be obvious by now, the establishment will do almost anything to make sure Ron Paul does not win the Iowa caucus tomorrow. It will sabotage his campaign if that’s what it takes to make sure he does not win. On December 29, the Occupy Des Moines or the Occupy the Caucus group traveled to Ron Paul’s Ankeny, Iowa, campaign office and staged an “impromptu demonstration.” A dozen or so protesters chanted anti-Paul slogans and blocked the door of the office. Five of them were arrested after the police ordered them to disperse. Clarke Davidson and Occupy Des Moines members are arrested. On December 31, The End Run website noted that one of the arrested, Clarke Davidson, has an interesting background. In addition to claiming to be a Ron Paul precinct captain, Clarke is the person who uploaded a video to YouTube purportedly from the shadowy hacktivist group Anonymous calling for a shut down of the Iowa caucus. “In case you haven’t heard, this ‘threat’ video is now being used in conjunction with these ‘Occupy’ protests (which have targeted other candidates this week as well) as a pretext to move the vote counting in Iowa to a secret location,” explains the website. Oddly, although Davidson now disagrees with Paul – despite claiming to be a precinct captain for his campaign – he was holding an End the Fed placard when he was arrested. Ron Paul, of course, wrote the book on the End the Fed movement. The threat to shut down the caucus has given the establishment the perfect excuse it needs to count the vote at a secret location and make sure Ron Paul loses. It also provides a pretext to get the FBI and the Iowa Intelligence Fusion Center involved. Iowa RINOs are “assessing security procedures” and “crafting a new, more error-proof system for the roughly 800 Republican caucus sites to report their results to party headquarters.” The End Run has posted a detailed timeline covering the suspicious activities of Clarke Davidson, who fits the profile of a governmental intelligence operative to the letter. His behavior has all the hallmarks of COINTELPRTO activity. Vote manipulation and rigging in the United States is epidemic, as Black Box Voting has documented, so it should come as no surprise that the establishment would attempt to skew the caucus in order to downgrade Ron Paul and damage his effort win the presidency and work to finally return the United States to its constitutional republic roots. It now appears our rulers will engineer the result they desire – Romney in the lead with Santorum second – and they have the police state apparatus in place to micromanage the effort under the guise of hacktivist and Occupy terrorism threats. If elements of the Occupy movement and Anonymous are not intelligence operations, then they are nothing less than useful idiots who will allow the state to once again determine the outcome of an important election.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
pac522
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2012, 12:13:27 AM » |
|
Republican Strategist: Iowa GOP Will Not Allow Ron Paul To Win http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQXVB9buAmc&feature=shareComment from that video: Wow. This makes me sick to my stomach. She's so dumb. I'm 33 years old... WAY done with college. My husband is the GOP chair of our county and we are both HUGE Ron Paul supporters and have been since 2007. So yeah this lady doesn't know crap. I have many family and friends who live in Iowa who are as old as I am or older that are caucusing tomorrow for Ron Paul. Suck it lady.
Stingrae57
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This country did not achieve greatness with the mindset of "safety first" but rather "live free or die".
Truth is the currency of love. R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution!
We are all running on Gods laptop. The problem is the virus called the Illuminati. ~EvadingGrid
The answer to 1984 is 1776.
|
|
|
|
shipgeek
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2012, 12:23:04 AM » |
|
Iowa GOP Plans Vote Fraud
You bet. The vote count will be rigged. They will get Romney to win. Have no illusions. It's all planned in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
E MARE LIBERTAS
|
|
|
Geolibertarian
Global Moderator
Member
   
Offline
Posts: 9,866
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.ae911truth.org
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2012, 01:00:54 AM » |
|
Iowa GOP Plans Vote Fraud In a blatantly transparent attempt to steal the election from Ron Paul, the Iowa GOP moves to hide the site of vote tabulation and reporting from public eyes. This is what happens when candidates who've clearly been cheated refuse to pursue legal action against vote-riggers for fear of being called a "sore loser": it only encourages the culprits to do the same thing in the next election (and the one after that, and the one after that). That's why I was so disappointed when Ron Paul (perhaps due to bad advice) didn't devote any of the millions of dollars he got from the 2007 money bomb to pursuing criminal charges against those who rigged the 2008 New Hampshire primary: http://infowars.net/articles/january2008/100108LHS.htm http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3657717699249085861If these criminals continue to receive the message that no one will even try to hold them accountable for their actions, then won't the past just keep repeating itself over and over again? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dig
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2012, 02:42:56 AM » |
|
You bet. Yup. that they PLAN on rigging it. I also know that they could not stop Rand Paul even though he ran against the guy that COUNTS THE VOTES IN KENTUCKY! I shit you not! And it was so overwhelming they could not rig it even thoug they planned to. The vote count will be rigged. Only if they are allowed to rig it without any fear. I do not think that is the case this year. The only way they will be able to rig it without unbelievable blowback and complete loss of credibility is if people are apathetic and do not stay focused on the message of liberty, freedom, the constitution, and integrity in the democratic process. They will get Romney to win. Really? I do not think even they have decided that one. Did you even read this thread? It actually exposes the fact that there is a confirmed treasonous operation of anti-government terrorists who are a threat to national security and how to defeat this threat through sunshine at the caucuses. Nazi sympathizers like the Roves, the Bushes, the Rockefellers, and the Harrimans cannot continue to destroy the very fabric of this country if we no longer allow them to. The biggest enemy we face is our own apathy. Have no illusions. They are the ones living in illusions, their entire existance is surrounded by mythology and false narratives: WMDs Iraq would be over in weeks Libya would be over in days Torture yields intelligence Ron Paul does not know what he is talking about The constitution is just a GD piece of paper No child left behind Defense of Democracies Everything out of their mouth is a fricking illusion. If believing something based on truth and the continued understanding of the constitution is now referred to a "illusion" then take me to fricking la-la land because the Nazi New World Order "logical song" leaves nothing but carnage and desolation. It's all planned in advance. Wow, you sound like a CNN journalsit. Nothing is going as planned for these nutballs and everyone can now see it. They did not count on him being in the lead right now, they did not count on Kelly Clarkson, they did not count on Bachmann's entire staff defecting, they did not count on us. They did not count on us dissecting the NDAA and proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is 100% illegal and fraud before the pen ever struck the paper, and they did not count on Abraham Lincoln's words being preserved to this very day and beyond... "Many free countries have lost their liberty, and ours may lose hers; but if she shall, be it my proudest plume, not that I was the last to desert, but that I never deserted her. I know that the great volcano at Washington, aroused and directed by the evil spirit that reigns there, is belching forth the lava of political corruption in a current broad and deep, which is sweeping with frightful velocity over the whole length and breadth of the land, bidding fair to leave unscathed no green spot or living thing; while on its bosom are riding, like demons on the waves of hell, the imps of that evil spirit, and fiendishly taunting all those who dare resist its destroying course with the hopelessness of their effort; and, knowing this, I cannot deny that all may be swept away. Broken by it I, too, may be; bow to it I never will. ~Abraham Lincoln This was spoken in 1839
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
Wintermute
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: January 03, 2012, 04:11:12 AM » |
|
If possible, I think Campaign for Liberty should do their own exit polling to see how closely their vote tally matches the official one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SUPREMEMASTER
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2012, 04:42:06 AM » |
|
 Cell-Phone texting poll^ It'll be nuts if he's winning everywhere EXCEPT the actual caucus... If that happens, how will we not notice? It's like one of those children's grade-school or even kindergarden educational "spot the difference" or basically "spot the anomaly in the pattern" type of things. Winning. Winning. Losing. Winning. Oh wait, durrrrrr. I f**king found it. It's the word that begins with the L that says losing. In reality it would be like... Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Winning. Losing. Winning. Why does Ron Paul win all the time?! Oh gee, it's not like he's speaking the truth or that he's a genuine or anything. Naw, he's just a nutso kook. Yup. Mhmm.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Automatic User Post Signature:The message has to be put out in the right way.
|
|
|
|
SUPREMEMASTER
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: January 04, 2012, 02:44:30 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Automatic User Post Signature:The message has to be put out in the right way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pac522
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2012, 07:43:00 AM » |
|
Those ladies were nuns. I don't think they did anything wrong. CNN just used them as a Jedi mind trick, these are not the droids you're looking for. They had you think there were some votes missing and so Romney was the winner, distracting you from all the votes Ron Paul was missing. They duped those poor two old ladies, I don't think they're operatives.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This country did not achieve greatness with the mindset of "safety first" but rather "live free or die".
Truth is the currency of love. R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution!
We are all running on Gods laptop. The problem is the virus called the Illuminati. ~EvadingGrid
The answer to 1984 is 1776.
|
|
|
|
lee51
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: January 05, 2012, 08:37:29 AM » |
|
On the Ron Paul forum this morning a man who was there at one voting place in Iowa filming the whole voting process insists (I saw one film) it was done legally and fairly. He says he watched the votes being taken, watched the man count them, then the lady phones the counts in to the State of Iowa--so it was supposedly done all fairly. I agree, it probably was.
WHAT ABOUT THE PHONE CALL TO THE STATE? Why wouldn't they just switch Santoriums vote with Ron Pauls? I mean the governor himself said Ron Paul would NOT WIN in his State.
I am also very disappointed Ron isn't pursuing obvious FRAUD on behalf of the State of Iowa. How can he possibly win NH now or anywhere else when this kind of crap is allowed?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Geolibertarian
Global Moderator
Member
   
Offline
Posts: 9,866
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.ae911truth.org
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: January 05, 2012, 08:56:10 AM » |
|
I am also very disappointed Ron isn't pursuing obvious FRAUD on behalf of the State of Iowa. How can he possibly win NH now or anywhere else when this kind of crap is allowed? He can't, but it must be allowed to happen anyway (so the unquestioned argument goes), otherwise establishment shills in the corporate-whore "news" media might start calling him names. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jofortruth
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: January 05, 2012, 01:22:10 PM » |
|
Those ladies were nuns. I don't think they did anything wrong. CNN just used them as a Jedi mind trick, these are not the droids you're looking for. They had you think there were some votes missing and so Romney was the winner, distracting you from all the votes Ron Paul was missing. They duped those poor two old ladies, I don't think they're operatives.
I agree. Those ladies were duped. They said they had already turned in their votes. So, did they duplicate the submission of those votes? Something is not right in Clinton County, Iowa!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lee51
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: January 05, 2012, 01:39:17 PM » |
|
In that case, Ron needs Jesse Venture - he wouldn't care what anyone called him, he'd be looking into voter fraud probably WHILE it was happening before anyone could blink an eye!! Jesse would make a good VP!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|