My initial rough guess here is that in order to 'end the rule' of the oligarchy monsters (whatever we call them) that we need to take down a bit of it, by precedence. Legally. It's like with Al Capone -- he couldn't be prosecuted on even racketeering or any big concept of 'organized crime', but something specific, like tax evasion. So, with 9/11 -- it's one of the 'walls in the facade'. So, my best guess is we need a do-able legal case; one that may not get the whole enchilada, but does take a severe swipe against something in 9/11 -- because 9/11 IS 'the event that changed everything'.
Since I woke up to 9/11 (yes, I was late to the game, but I'm trying to make up for it) -- I think one of the key things that the patriot community is still BLIND to is this 9/11 issue. And it is crucial. This is what divides the conservatives and libertarians, and liberals as well -- if we can get on the same page on this one, and get all eyes to be aware of the false flag tendency and likelihood(!) -- then we have a useful and motivated MOVEMENT possible.
Targeting then -- beyond Paul -- are there some 'best lawsuits' about 9/11 that may have teeth?
I realize there may be just this topic discussed many places on this big forum, but any help welcome, and I'll research more as I get to it.
thanks for the replies and excuse my delays.
I'm on Facebook and can be found here: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001207200701