Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?

Author Topic: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?  (Read 11964 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SUPREMEMASTER

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,830
  • Commander
    • http://www.activismoverdrive.comze.com
I just ran in from a different room in the house after I was just watching some TV and saw them bringing up some old news letters from approx. 30 years ago (give or take) that Ron Paul denies that he even wrote where in the letters he calls black people animals and says Martin Luther King raped children or something...

Memory is slightly fuzzy with the details about the CNN hit-piece psych. warfare attack.
Automatic User Post Signature:
The message has to be put out in the right way.
Website Still Needs to be updated |ActivismOverDrive.comze.net|

Offline Zero.Cool

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Did anyone just watch as CNN tried to make Ron Paul look rascist?
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2011, 06:01:52 PM »
The newsletter issue is just the dinosaur media desperate attempt to beat a dead horse. How many times was this brought up the last election cycle? I remember specifically CNN asking Ron about the letters. It's just another smear job, obviously not working.

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Re: Did anyone just watch as CNN tried to make Ron Paul look rascist?
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2011, 06:10:22 PM »
Silly smear from desperate people.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2011, 06:20:22 PM »
Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/hey-cnn-can-we-talk-about-whats-going-on-between-you-and-ron-paul/
by Alex Alvarez | 10:44 pm, December 21st, 2011


CNN, boo boos, can we talk? I’m getting a little worried about you. Here, sit down. Have some of this Wolf Spritzer I picked up at your gift shop. No, yeah, it’s pretty good. Tastes like berries. Berries and gravitas.

So. Are you and Ron Paul having, like. A thing?

Yesterday, when Paul sat down with Ali Velshi, Velshi brought up a newsletter (or, at this point, The Newsletter™), sent out two decades ago, which espoused some pretty problematic racist beliefs. Paul, as he has done each and every time he’s been asked about The Newsletter in recent years, maintained that he did not write those things, adding that “those aren’t my beliefs. So I sleep well.” Velshi pressed on, and Paul advised doubters to actually read what he’s written, read the newsletter in question, and find out the truth for themselves.

RELATED: Ron Paul And Ali Velshi Engage In Spirited Debate Over Alleged Media Bias

Then, today, Gloria Borger asked Paul about the newsletter yet again.

Here’s how Paul responded:

Why don’t you go back and look at what I said yesterday on CNN and what I’ve said for 20 something years. 22 years ago? I didn’t write them, I disavow them. That’s it.

Borger, like Velshi before her, pressed on, telling Paul that, whether or not he agrees with the sentiments expressed in the newsletter, he made money off them. She then continued to ask if it was “legitimate” to ask about the newsletter. Paul eventually removed his mic and walked off, possibly because one can only answer the same question so many times before doing the politician’s equivalent of taking off one’s earrings and reaching for the Vaseline.

“I did have to ask them,” Borger later said of her line of questioning. “He clearly thinks its irrelevant. He thinks it’s been asked and answered…It’s clearly a question he’d rather not be asked.”

RELATED: Rep. Ron Paul Gets Irked By Newsletter Questions, Walks Out Of CNN Interview

Now, tonight, you go after the guy again. Sanjay Gupta, sitting in for Anderson Cooper, reported that Paul has a tendency to get “kind of prickly” when asked about the newsletter, which is an interesting way of spinning the fact that the guy is tired of answering the same question from your network. Dr. Gupta then added that Paul’s story regarding the newsletter has “changed over the years,” before looking back on an interview Paul had given to Wolf Blitzer back in 2008. In that interview, Paul said that he didn’t know who wrote the offending articles, and that it was the job of the newsletters’ editor (and, thus, not their publisher) to take a close look at these writers and their content. What’s more, he said, he was busy traveling and tending to his medical practice at the time and, thus, did not have the luxury of being able to read through each and every newsletter.

In an effort to “keep him honest,” Gupta noted that, in 1996, Democrats had brought to light other articles — ones that Paul admitted to have written — including one in which he surmised that the activities of 95 percent of DC’s black male population is “semi-criminal or entirely criminal.” When asked about these, Paul denied being a racist or resorting to racist stereotypes in his articles.

Five years later, however, Paul said that these were “never his words,” but that he nonetheless had “some moral responsibility for them.”

Now, ten years after that, Gupta says that Paul is “blaming the media for bringing it up again.” (But perhaps that’s because the media is bringing it up again?) and adds that Paul isn’t doing much to “clear the air” about the newsletter.

To discuss it even further — because, of course — Gupta brought on Borger, Ari Fleischer, and Erick Erickson. And Elmo and Jon Bon Jovi and Keyboard Cat.

Tell me, CNN. Is all this because he’s gained traction in Iowa? Is he just the latest Notmitt Notromney to have captured the media’s attention and, as such, its subsequent ire? Put more plainly: Why cover this now? And why so much? You’re not looking at a decades-old story from a different angle, you’re not revealing new information, you’re merely reheating the same embarrassing, racist meal (just…. go with it) you keep serving us every few years. This is becoming, at this point, the McRib of Embarrassing Political Stories. Why?
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2011, 06:21:36 PM »
CNN Poll: Ron Paul Most Popular Republican Amongst Non-Whites
So much for the “racist” smear

http://www.prisonplanet.com/cnn-poll-ron-paul-most-popular-republican-amongst-non-whites.html
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, December 22, 2011


While the establishment media continues to hype a 15-year-old story concerning decades old newsletters as part of a dirty tricks campaign to smear Ron Paul as a racist, the latest CNN poll shows that Paul has the most support from non-whites out of all the Republican candidates.

The latest CNN/ORC poll released Tuesday finds that Congressman Paul scores highest amongst minorities when matched up against Barack Obama in a hypothetical election head to head.

Paul scores 25% of the vote amongst non-whites, whereas Romney polls at 20% and Gingrich gets 15%.

Ron Paul is clearly the most popular GOP contender amongst non-whites out of the entire field, suggesting that the “racist” smear, which was heavily pushed back in 2008, has had very little impact whatsoever on the views of those who presumably would be the most likely to be offended by it.

Indeed, it’s a remarkable coincidence that those who seem to be most offended by the non-controversy are well to do, white, establishment Republican cheerleaders, Paul’s foremost political adversaries.

The establishment media has predictably launched a second round of smear concerning the “racist newsletter” controversy that was first reported in 1996 and firmly debunked when it cropped up again in 2008.

Unsurprisingly, the hit piece was originated by a hardened anti-Paul neo-con who enjoys membership of the same shadowy billionaire-financed lobbying group as Paul’s election rival Newt Gingrich.

Paul has repeatedly pointed out that he had nothing to do with writing the offensive statements and didn’t even read them until years later, at which point he completely disowned the content.

The key piece of evidence, universally ignored by the race baiters, which proves Ron Paul’s stance was the exact opposite of that portrayed in some of the newsletters released under his name in the early 1990′s, relates to Martin Luther King.

The attack dogs have attempted to imply that Ron Paul either wrote or at least signed off on the characterization of civil rights hero King as a violent philanderer who “seduced underage girls and boys,” and that he criticized Ronald Reagan for signing legislation creating the federal holiday in his name, which Paul’s newsletter (not written by Paul) labeled “hate whitey day”.

If this was Paul’s belief in the early 90′s then why, over a decade previously and then again in the early 80′s, did Paul vote to recognize Martin Luther King day as a public holiday, the only time in history that the Congressman has ever voted for something that is not explicitly authorized in the Constitution?

Ron Paul has accepted responsibility for the newsletters, he did so no less than 15 years ago, but he has maintained the fact that he never wrote or approved what was written in them. His support for a day to honor Martin Luther King years before newsletters were written by other authors denigrating King, provides concrete evidence for this assertion.

Paul’s support for King back in the 70′s proves that the newsletters were written by other people and did not represent the views of Paul himself, debunking the entire farce for what it is – a craftily manufactured smear attack.

Ron Paul is the most popular Republican candidate amongst minorities because he seeks to end the war on drugs and the biased, racist court system it engenders that unfairly targets minorities.

The video below illustrates how Ron Paul’s policies are almost universally in the same spirit as Martin Luther King, and how minorities are resonating with his message of true liberty.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2011, 06:25:06 PM »
CNN's Gloria Borger's husband: architected Iran-Contra/FEMA CAMP cover up!
Holy shit, this it completely insane!!!!!!!!!

Our tax money pays for these contractors whose job is to cover up genocide, and he accuses Ron Paul of racism? Is this a fricking joke?

Lance Morgan, husband of CNN's Gloria Borger
http://www.gspm.org/caplancemorgan

Lance Morgan is chief communications strategist at Powell Tate in Washington, D.C.  He specializes in developing and executing communications strategies for public policy debates, crisis communications and media training.

Morgan provides communications counsel to clients facing national and international media attention because of public policy controversies, congressional oversight hearings, criminal and civil investigations by law enforcement agencies, labor-management negotiations and trade disputes.

An experienced media trainer, he also regularly prepares clients for Congressional testimony and interviews with major national print and broadcast media, including 60 Minutes and 60 Minutes II.

Morgan has been the primary architect of numerous integrated communications programs on behalf of Powell Tate clients.  In recent years, he has worked with clients in the financial services, pharmaceutical and food industries. He served as the executive in charge of an advertising, grassroots and media relations team working for major food and agricultural companies in educating the public on...

the benefits of biotechnology.


He was the executive in charge of several advertising, grassroots communications, media relations and polling projects during significant public policy controversies in recent years.[/b] He also served as a key advisor to a former cabinet member who was the subject of an investigation by a special prosecutor [Scooter Libby?, Eric Holder?].

Previously, Morgan was the executive in charge of communications for a coalition of associations seeking passage of product liability legislation.  He also served as a principal advisor to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum for all media-related activities connected with the opening of the museum in 1993 and its 10th anniversary in 2003.

Prior to joining the firm in 1988, Morgan served as press secretary and spokesman for the U.S. Senate Iran-Contra investigating committee, which was led by Senators Daniel K. Inouye (D-HI) and Warren Rudman (R-NH).  He was a principal writer and editor of the committee's majority report on the investigation.  From 1983 to 1986, Morgan was press secretary to Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY).  During his congressional service, Morgan routinely prepared Democrats and Republicans for newspaper and television interviews.

Before his Senate service, Morgan was a journalist for British and American newspapers.

He is married to Gloria Borger, Senior Political Analyst at CNN.


Just so we are all clear...

This guy manufactures and controls false narratives so that the American people never learn the truth about some of the greatest threats to our national security...

He covered up Iran-Contra which by any account is an open act of treason.

He likely covered up the treason of Valerie Plame.

He covers for Wall Street, Big Pharma, Big Agra, and Biotech...which accounts for the monopolization and destabilization of huge sectors of American industry.

He controls many fake grassroots operations that push his false narratives.

He controls polls about these industries.

He is contracted using taxpayer money to spread false realities to the American people.

This is his job, this is what he does. No longer can the American people think that grassroots and incompetance is to blame for such disasters caused by these industries...it is the exact opposit, they are meticulously planned by mythology creators like this total nutball.

WTF?

This is THE MOST TRUSTED NAME IN NEWS?

Are you fricking shitting me?

How the hell does she go to work each day helping her husbband manufacture lies to trick the American people and have no moral dilemma? That must totally suck.
Iran-Contra, FEMA camps & Rex 84
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a secretive "scenario and drill" developed by the United States federal government to suspend the United States Constitution, declare martial law, place military commanders in charge of state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens who are deemed to be "national security threats", in the event that the President declares a "State of Domestic National Emergency". The plan states that events that might cause such a declaration would be widespread U.S. opposition to a U.S. military invasion abroad, such as if the United States were to directly invade Central America.[1][2][3][4][5][6] To combat what the government perceived as "subversive activities", the plan also authorized the military to direct ordered movements of civilian populations at state and regional levels.[7]

Rex 84 was written by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North, who was both National Security Council White House Aide, and NSC liaison to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and John Brinkerhoff, the deputy director of "national preparedness" programs for FEMA. They patterned the plan on a 1970 report written by FEMA chief Louis Giuffrida, at the Army War College, which proposed the detention of up to 21 million "American Negroes", if there were a black militant uprising in the United States.[1][8] Existence of a master military contingency plan (of which REX-84 was a part), "Garden Plot" and a similar earlier exercise, "Lantern Spike" were originally revealed by journalist Ron Ridenhour, who summarized his findings in an article in CounterSpy.[9]

Transcripts from the Iran-Contra Hearings in 1987 record the following dialogue between Congressman Jack Brooks, Oliver North's attorney Brendan Sullivan and Senator Daniel Inouye, the Democratic Chair of the joint Senate-House Committee:[10]

[Congressman Jack] Brooks: Colonel North, in your work at the N.S.C. were you not assigned, at one time, to work on plans for the continuity of government in the event of a major disaster?

Brendan Sullivan [North's counsel, agitatedly]: Mr. Chairman?

[Senator Daniel] Inouye: I believe that question touches upon a highly sensitive and classified area so may I request that you not touch upon that?

Brooks: I was particularly concerned, Mr. Chairman, because I read in Miami papers, and several others, that there had been a plan developed, by that same agency, a contingency plan in the event of emergency, that would suspend the American constitution. And I was deeply concerned about it and wondered if that was an area in which he had worked. I believe that it was and I wanted to get his confirmation.

Inouye: May I most respectfully request that that matter not be touched upon at this stage. If we wish to get into this, I'm certain arrangements can be made for an executive session.


Exercises similar to Rex 84 happen regularly.[11] For example, from 1967 to 1971 the FBI kept a list of over 100,000 persons to be rounded up as subversive, dubbed the "ADEX" list.[12]

The basic facts about Rex 84 and other contingency planning readiness exercises—and the potential threat they pose to civil liberties if fully implemented in a real operation—are taken seriously by scholars and civil libertarians.[13][broken citation]


See also
NSPD-51
COINTELPRO
Non-Detention Act
Posse Comitatus Act
Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007

References
^ a b Smith, Christian (1996). Resisting Reagan: the U.S. Central America peace movement. University of Chicago Press. pp. 310. ISBN 9780226763361. http://books.google.com/?id=JgcalG3UwWAC&pg=RA4-PA310&dq=rex-84&cd=1#v=onepage&q=rex-84.
^ Ross Gelbspan (1991). Break-ins, death threats and the FBI: the covert war against the central America movement. South End Press. p. 184. ISBN 9780896084124. http://books.google.com/books?id=ymANimNtKAIC&pg=PA184.
^ Peter Dale Scott (2008). The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America. University of California Press. pp. 183–184. ISBN 9780520258716. http://books.google.com/books?id=eeYiVXWBGHIC&pg=PA183.
^ Holly Sklar (1988). Washington's war on Nicaragua. South End Press. pp. 357–359. ISBN 9780896082953. http://books.google.com/books?id=IbFXs7_LutMC&pg=PA357.
^ Ward Churchill; Jim Vander Wall (2002). The COINTELPRO papers: documents from the FBI's secret wars against dissent in the United States. South End Press. pp. 410–411. ISBN 9780896086487.
^ Cited by David Thoreen: The President's Emergency War Powers And The Erosion Of Civil Liberties In Pynchon's Vineland. In: Oklahoma City University Law Review. 24, No. 3, 1999, footnote 117
^ Reynolds
^ Miami Herald, 1987 July 5, "Reagan Aides and the Secret Government," free archived copies at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/24621067/Reagan-Aides-and-the-Secret-Government-The-Miami-Herald-July-5-1987 and at: http://cantankerousbuddha.com/reagan-aides-and-the-secret-government-the-mi and at: http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=9877
^ Ridenhour, Ron (1975). "Garden Plot and the New Action Army". CounterSpy.
^ [Transcript from the House Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran, New York Times, July 14, 1987]
^ Diana Reynolds, "The Rise of the National Security State: FEMA and the NSC," CovertAction Information Bulletin, issue #33 (Winter 1990).
^ Donner, Frank (1980). The Age of Surveillance: The Aims & Methods of America's Political Intelligence System. New York: Alfred Knopf. pp. 166. ISBN 0394747712.
^ Berlet and Reynolds

External links
"Continuity of Government: Is the State of Emergency Superseding our Constitution?" Peter Dale Scott, Global Research, November 24, 2010; (transcript from a speech given to the Commonwealth Club, San Francisco, CA, November 23, 2010)
"Reagan Aides and the 'Secret' Government," Alfonso Chardy, Miami Herald, July 5, 1987. Also available as photoscans in PDF format here.
"Martial Law Concerns," Congressman Jim McDermott, House of Representatives, March 11, 2003
Information about Operation Garden Plot, the larger operation of which Rex 84 was a part
"Foundations are in place for martial law in the US," Ritt Goldstein, Sydney Morning Herald, July 27, 2002
Chip Berlet, Right Woos Left, Discussion of Rex 84 conspiracy theories.
Government censors document revealing plans to wage war on Americans

http://www.infowars.com/government-censors-document-revealing-plans-to-wage-war-on-americans/

Within an hour of posting FEMA continuity of government plans, PDF pre-bid noticed deep sixed.

Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
December 21, 2011

Within an hour of posting a critical FEMA document sourced publicly on a government website that discloses plans to hire contract employees under a continuity of government plan, that document was removed and replaced by the following cryptic warning against posting ‘classified’ documents:

The government-linked document we posted was marked ‘Source Selection Sensitive’ but not considered classified. Further, it was listed publicly on a government website that was soliciting bids for government contracts. However, despite its public classification, it contains information that clearly is NOT intended to gain wide publicity.

As we reported earlier, the highly contentious federal government plans for Continuity of Government (COG) are largely classified, yet have come to light in shards. Congressman Peter de Fazio made waves after going on the House floor to give a speech raising hell about how the plans for COG, including martial law, were not only classified, but kept secret from Congress, the only organ of public officialdom still tied directly to the people. Similarly, this clip shows the 1980s investigations into the Iran-Contra Affair where questions about the Rex 84 plan for martial law were met with sharp calls for silence for national security reasons:

YouTube Video: Police State 4— Clip: Martial Law, FEMA Camps, and Forced National Service

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yDOib-7FMI

However, there are plenty of completely public Homeland Security and FEMA documents detailing parts of the secretive COG plans for a national emergency. Among these is the document we covered earlier, as this document reveals not only detailed aspects of the COG personnel relocation plans and martial law takeover of communications, but a plan to militarily-target Americans and designate them as enemy combatants– dramatically, through a blue/red high-tech surveillance matrix aimed at suppressing dissidents and occupying the homeland.

Click below to read the restored pages of that suppressed document now:

Page 1, Page 2, Page 3, Page 4, Page 5, Page 6, Page 7, Page 8, Page 9, Page 10, Page 11

(CLICKABLE LINK BUTTONS ABOVE ^^^^)

The important clip above also documents numerous executive orders specifying a takeover of civil America. FEMA, and its overlord mother the Department of Homeland Security, have been given enormous powers, and are now beginning to use them. That’s why this new document is compelling enough for the government to cover up. FEMA camps are being staffed for stand-by operation– that’s what the recent KBR documents covered by Infowars.com show.

RELATED: Detention Camp Order Follows Preparations For Civil Unrest

Now, we find FEMA soliciting personnel to run a military-COG program that designates Americans as an enemy population. It is a perfect storm, timed with the Bill of Rights-destroying 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that puts on paper the indefinite detention of Americans without trial.

Yet the smoking gun document is a public bid for contracting companies. It’s designation at FBO.gov is as a “Pre-Solicitation Notice for Program and Mission Support Services.”

Why don’t they want you to know? What HAS been exposed publicly points directly to overt takeovers of the constitutional government via martial law, the use of troops on the street (in violation of Posse Comitatus) and a definitive takeover of all communications, including the establishment of secure emergency communications lines for the the Continuity of Government controllers. More to the point, it validates the worst of fears– that rhetoric issued from political leaders in America demonizing its people as potential terrorists relates to real plans, albeit obscured from popular public knowledge, to target and indefinitely detain dissidents and other ordinary citizens any during declared emergencies, or for any pretext of national security.

That’s right. The stuff out of cautionary tales like Seven Days in May, reviewed here by Alex Jones, and translated onto screen in 1964, has come true. Whether for a worthwhile pretext or not, plans have been put into place to transfer power outside of elected government. In its place is a constitution-circumventing framework to share power between the special interests who have bought/run the executive branch and legislative branch, including the National Security shadow powers given precedent there, including military and CIA capabilities.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline global_fiefdom

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2011, 06:27:52 PM »
CNN got called out on vaccines and African nodding sickness, did nothing;

they are going to have more trouble ignoring this elephant in the room.

CNN's new colors should be YELLOW and BROWN

Biased Mudslinging

Offline Freeski

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,706
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2011, 06:30:12 PM »
CNN is the enemy! Along with the rest of the BS corporate media.

LOL @ Wolf Spritzer!
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2011, 06:41:24 PM »
Hey Gloria Borger...

WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO INTERVIEW TED TURNER?

CNN Founder Ted Turner, David Rockefeller, and the "Good Genes Club"
Eugenics plan to reduce the black population in America

http://euro-med.dk/?p=14723

The Background of Eugenics
Edwin Black, SFGate 2003: Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. The intent: Populate the Earth with vastly more of their own socioeconomic and biological kind - and less or none of everyone else. Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany.  In "Mein Kampf," published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. " Now, the American term "Nordic" was freely exchanged with "Germanic" or "Aryan."

Francis Galton (1822–1911) was a cousin of Charles Darwin. He introduced the new word “eugenics” (good genes): e.g.“The general intellectual capacity of our leaders requires to be raised, and also to be differentiated. The foremost minds of the present day seem to stagger and halt under an intellectual load too heavy for their powers. If talented men were mated with talented women, of the same mental and physical characters as themselves, generation after generation, we might produce a highly-bred human race.”

By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 — almost $4 million in today's money — to hundreds of German researchers. In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 toward creation of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry. Ernst Rüdin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression, being its leader. Further Rockefeller supported eugenics institutions was the Institute for Brain Research and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Berlin, Chief: Verschuer.
Josef Mengele was Verschuer´s man.
.
Two eugenicists fighting the overpopulation of this Earth with inferior races are David Rockefeller (left) and Ted Turner – both participants at the May meeting 2009 of the “Good Club” (read the Good Genes´Club) described by the Times above. Turner – the founder of the CNN – says population reduction is vital – or we shall be cooked because people produce global warming!! He wants to see mankind reduced to 2 bn. people. In 1996 he only wanted 300 mio people on the planet. he has 5 children himself!!
US Supreme Court Judge Ruth Ginsburg is on their team, too, stating that “abortion is necessary to reduce populations we don´t want too many of”!

Ted Tuner, Bill Gates, David Rockefeller and The ‘Good Club’
http://oilgeopolitics.net/Swine_Flu/Gates_Vaccines/gates_vaccines.html
By F. William Engdahl, 4 March 2010

Gates’ TED2010 speech on zero emissions and population reduction is consistent with a report that appeared in New York City’s ethnic media, Irish.Central.com in May 2009. According to the report, a secret meeting took place on May 5, 2009 at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, President of Rockefeller University, among some of the wealthiest people in America. Investment guru Warren Buffett who in 2006 decided to pool his $30 billion Buffett Foundation into the Gates foundation to create the world’s largest private foundation with some $60 billions of tax-free dollars was present. Banker David Rockefeller was the host.

The exclusive letter of invitation was signed by Gates, Rockefeller and Buffett. They decided to call themselves the “Good Club.” Also present was media czar Ted Turner, billionaire founder of CNN who stated in a 1996 interview for the Audubon nature magazine, where he said that a 95% reduction of world population to between 225-300 million would be “ideal.” In a 2008 interview at Philadelphia’s Temple University, Turner fine-tuned the number to 2 billion, a cut of more than 70% from today’s population. Even less elegantly than Gates, Turner stated, “we have too many people. That’s why we have global warming. We need less people using less stuff (sic).”16

Others attending this first meeting of the Good Club reportedly were: Eli Broad real estate billionaire, New York’s billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Wall Street billionaire and Council on Foreign Relations former head, Peter G. Peterson.

In addition, Julian H. Robertson, Jr., hedge-fund billionaire who worked with Soros attacking the currencies of Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea and the Asian Tigen economies, precipitating the 1997-98 Asia Crisis. Also present at the first session of the Good Club was Patty Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Gates foundation, and John Morgridge of Cisco Systems. The group represented a combined fortune of more than $125 billion.17

According to reports apparently leaked by one of the attendees, the meeting was held in response to the global economic downturn and the numerous health and environmental crises that are plaguing the globe.

But the central theme and purpose of the secret Good Club meeting of the plutocrats was the priority concern posed by Bill Gates, namely, how to advance more effectively their agenda of birth control and global population reduction. In the talks a consensus reportedly emerged that they would “back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.”18

Global Eugenics agenda

Gates and Buffett are major funders of global population reduction programs, as is Turner, whose UN Foundation was created to funnel $1 billion of his tax-free stock option earnings in AOL-Time-Warner into various birth reduction programs in the developing world.19 The programs in Africa and elsewhere are masked as philanthropy and providing health services for poor Africans. In reality they involve involuntary population sterilization via vaccination and other medicines that make women of child-bearing age infertile. The Gates Foundation, where Buffett deposited the bulk of his wealth two years ago, is also backing introduction of GMO seeds into Africa under the cloak of the Kofi Annan-led ‘Second Green Revolution’ in Africa. The introduction of GMO patented seeds in Africa to date has met with enormous indigenous resistance.

Health experts point out that were the intent of Gates really to improve the health and well-being of black Africans, the same hundreds of millions of dollars the Gates Foundation has invested in untested and unsafe vaccines could be used in providing minimal sanitary water and sewage systems. Vaccinating a child who then goes to drink feces-polluted river water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of course cleaning up the water and sewage systems of Africa would revolutionize the health conditions of the Continent.

Gates’ TED2010 comments about having new vaccines to reduce global population were obviously no off-the-cuff remark. For those who doubt, the presentation Gates made at the TED2009 annual gathering said almost exactly the same thing about reducing population to cut global warming. For the mighty and powerful of the Good Club, human beings seem to be a form of pollution equal to CO2.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #9 on: December 22, 2011, 06:57:47 PM »
CNN Poll: Ron Paul Most Popular Republican Amongst Non-Whites
So much for the “racist” smear

http://www.prisonplanet.com/cnn-poll-ron-paul-most-popular-republican-amongst-non-whites.html
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, December 22, 2011

One of the comments worth mentioning:


Mythic Mystic says:
December 22, 2011 at 1:23 pm

Ron Paul doesn’t care if you are Black…

…or if you are white, or latino, or Jewish, or Arab; Ron Paul only cares that you have liberty and justice and not ruled over by reckless Authoritarians. In response to the mainstream attacks on Ron Paul since his sudden rise as frontrunner, I would like to point out a few things:

- Ron Paul wants to end the war on drugs which disproportionately effects minorities and minority communities, releasing non-violent offenders (he would free more black men than Lincoln)

- Ron Paul wants to end the Endless Wars (all wars are racist, name one that does not have racial overtones) that not only effect people of all races in this nation but also promotes violence against people of other cultures (if you don’t know about the plight of Black Libyans after our “lead from the rear/ UN validating /Undeclared” war, then you need to educate yourself.)

- Ron Paul is against a boarder fence stating that it can “keep us in as well as others out” and “it won’t work and costs too much money”

- Ron Paul is against the Patriot Act of the Bush era and the NDAA2011 of the Obama era which effects everyone regardless of race (effecivly making Americans “terrorists”). No other Republican or Obama is against this, only Ron Paul.

- Ron Paul doesn’t want our police (or any part of the government) violating the rights of any American.

- Ron Paul is Pro-Life, not only because of spiritual and moral conviction but knowing about the racist eugenics program of social engeneering and also knowing that 54% of black people don’t even exist today because of abortion since 1970.

- Ron Paul supports the family, which the Establishment wants the State to replace your family. That is why ethnic (and white) groups with stong family values get targeted by CPS and the dependancy system.

- Ron Paul wants freindship and trade with all nations, the authoritarians want to bomb anybody who looks at us funny.

- Ron Paul is a Libertarian (individual liberty) which is the opposite of collectivism, Racisim is the ugliest form of collectivism.

- Ron Paul believes in States Rights, yes, but he also knows that the State (and the Fed) only get their power from the PEOPLE. Read the 10th Amendment, it states that THE PEOPLE are the ultimate authority. We give the State permission to conduct our business.

- Ron Paul supported Israel’s right to defend its self back in 1981 when they attacked an Iranian facillity. Every Republican, including Reagan, condemed Israel for that action, not Ron Paul. He still supports Israel’s right to defend its self and defends their right to exist and respects their sovreignty.

- And many other examples can be cited…

So how many Republicans AND Democrats can claim such a record? Ron Paul believes that FEAR is what weakens America. If you FEAR Ron Paul because you “think” he is racist by association and that White People are out to “get you”, then you fall right in line with what the Authoritarian Establishment wants you to believe. Same goes for those whites that have FEAR of being labled a “racist”, don’t be fooled by those that want to bomb whole races into genocide while indefiantally detaining American citizens forever without trial (NDAA2011). The Establishment is crying “Racist!” to distract you from the fact that Ron Paul has been fighting for EVERYONE in America, and the world. The others don’t even come close.

I don’t need someone to “tell” me if someone is racist or not, I can tell by their actions and not what others have said in their name. Lets’ go ahead and tar-and-feather Rush Limbagh and Micheal Moore then if you are really offened. What about the Bush family and their CIA and Nazi past? What about Obama and his familie’s CIA and Terrorist past? What about Goldman Sachs and international banksters “owning” most parties around the world?! What about the Neo-Con PNAC document of 2000 that talked about “Race specific Bio-weapons”?!! You get it yet? You are being played so you stay in your political pen. They are telling you to shut up and sit down and choose Republican Death and Economic enslavement or the Democrat version. They are both Authoritarians, Ron Paul and the American people are the only thing standing in their way. Wise up, don’t be fooled again.

And those still worried about his newsletters, try to read his books and then try to figure out about the propaganda being shoved down your throat. Also I would advise researching “false flag” and “establishment provocateurs”, maybe you will then understand what is going on in the real world.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #10 on: December 22, 2011, 07:20:27 PM »
CNN Founder Ted Turner is part of the "Billionaires For Eugenics" Club
http://theintelhub.com/2011/05/08/billionaires-for-eugenics/
The Intel Hub
By Servando Gonzalez
May 8, 2011

On May 5th, 2009, some of the most notorious members of the “billionaires club” — David Rockefeller, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Eli Broad, Peter G. Peterson, Patty Stonesifer, John Morgridge, Michael Bloomberg and a few other billionaires –, secretly met at the Manhattan residence of Sir Paul Nurse, president of Rockefeller University.

The meeting was eerily similar to another meeting that took place on January 20, 1942, in Wansee, a Berlin suburb.

In the Wansee Conference, some high ranking Nazi officials, led by SS-Obergruppenführer Reinhard Heydrich, dispassionately discussed the more efficient methods to carry out the “Final solution to the Jewish question.”


Though European Jews were the main targets for elimination, other groups, especially Slavs, Romany and mentally and/or physically disabled Germans, were also persecuted and murdered. The total death toll is estimated at between 12 and 26 million.

As expected, the U.S. mainstream media was very careful not to inform the American people about the billionaires meeting in Manhattan, but some details eventually were known.

Quoting an anonymous person who attended the meeting, a major U.K. newspaper reported that “a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.”

According to other sources, billionaires who attended the secret meeting convened on the initiative of Bill Gates. Giving credibility to this is the fact that Gates had made similar points at a conference he attended on February 18, 2010, in Long Beach, California.

“Official projections say the world’s population will peak at 9.3 billion [up from 6.6 billion today] but with charitable initiatives, such as better reproductive healthcare, we think we can cap that at 8.3 billion,” Gates said. Translated into plain English, this means that Mr. gates is planning to participate in the killing of more than a billion human beings.

Also present at the meeting in Manhattan was media czar Ted Turner, billionaire founder of CNN who stated in a 1996 interview for the Audubon nature magazine, where he said that a 95% reduction of world population to between 225-300 million would be “ideal.” In a 2008 interview at Philadelphia’s Temple University, Turner fine-tuned the number to 2 billion, a cut of more than 70% from today’s population.

The Rockefeller family is known for their generosity in contributing, through their non-profit, “philanthropic” foundations, to all causes whose goal is population control. Actually they were instrumental in the creation of the eugenics movement in the U.S., which later was exported to Germany where the Nazis brought it to its highest development.

Since the early 1920’s the Rockefeller Foundation began funding the eugenics research in Germany through the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institutes in Berlin and Munich. Beginning in the 1950’s, John D. Rockefeller III, used his foundation money to create a population reduction neo-Malthusian program through his private Population Council in New York.

Survival Preparedness Is Essential for Everyone -  EMac’s Tactical Survival Shop(Ad)

It is not a coincidence that all of the billionaires who attended the Manhattan meeting are strong supporters of the creation of a New World Order. The NWO they envision is the global, communo-fascist totalitarian regime that will be implemented after they have killed 70% of the current world’s population and reduced the survivors to pre-industrial level of consumption.

This will be a techno-fascist medieval society with no middle class, with only the dirty poor serfs confined to decaying cities and the billionaire masters living in fortified castles, enjoying the beauty of a depopulated Gaia.

Some naïve people see this as another unfounded conspiracy theory. Their rationale is based on the belief that they would not want to kill us, when they need us as consumers to further engross their fortunes. We must remember that, when news spread that the Nazis were killing the Jews, some people, including some Jews, didn’t believe it.

The Nazis, they reasoned, needed them to exploit as slave labor in the war factories. Unfortunately, the ones who thought that ended up in the extermination camps. Trying to find logic in the minds of mass murderers is a perilous exercise in frustration.

Early this year, enviro-journalist Bryan Nelson wrote a Mother Nature Network report entitled “Was Genghis Khan History’s Greenest Conqueror?” [1] In it, he claimed that Genghis Khan’s invasions of the 13th and 14th centuries were so sweeping, it “may have been the first instance in history of a single culture causing man-made climate change.” According to Nelson, Genghis Khan contributed to cool the environment by “effectively scrubbing around 700 million tons of carbon from the atmosphere.”

Obviouysly, if Nelson survives the planned mass killing, he would happily write an article claiming that the eugenicist billionaires have gained their rightful place in history as the greenest mass killers in human history. I would not be surprised if somebody suggests carving their smiling faces in Mount Rushmore honoring their success in saving Gaia from us useless eaters.

Had a group of people secretly met to plan the assassination of one single person, it would be a conspiracy to commit a murder, a crime penalized by the U.S. law. But, even though the Manhattan meeting eventually leaked to the press, none of the would-be mass murderers have been indicted. Obviously, these billionaires see themselves above the law because they are above the law.

The would-be mass murderers’ rationale for wanting to kill more than a billion of us is that the Earth resources are limited, and we consume and pollute too much. But just a perfunctory analysis of the problem evidences that any of the billionaires who attended the secret meeting consume and pollute more in a single day than the people of some small third-world countries do in a year. Therefore, I would have expected that, if they really wanted to solve the problem in order to save the planet, they have plans to commit suicide after having killed their whole families.

Actually, just from the point of view of efficiency, that solution may be much more practical. But no. The hyperpolluter billionaires want to do it the hard way, by killing you, me, and several billion more. I guess that currently Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot are turning around in their graves, knowing that these billionaires are trying harder to beat their records as the greatest mass murderers in modern history.
Notes:

[1] Bryan Nelson, “Was Genghis Khan history’s greenest conqueror?,” MotherNatureNetwork, Jan 24 2011, http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/climate-weather/stories/was-genghis-khan-historys-greenest-conqueror.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #11 on: December 22, 2011, 07:23:28 PM »
It has now become obvious considering the plans for the FEMA/NAZI camps and Ron Paul's attempt to expose it...

I offer an appropriate analogy regarding this false narrative today and another in 1930's Germany:

Ron Paul is racist = Arbeit Macht Frei!

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline global_fiefdom

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #12 on: December 23, 2011, 12:47:43 AM »
Oprah went to the Club as well, I think in 2009.

O! My Goodness!    :o (didn't mean to hijack your purple actually)

Quote
This tired young man provides a synopsis of the Billionaires for Eugenics Document released in May.
http://uncensored.co.nz/2011/05/12/billionaires-for-eugenics-open-plan-for-depopulation/


Offline oyashango

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,524
  • 43 Trillion and counting
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #13 on: December 23, 2011, 01:36:17 PM »
It has now become obvious considering the plans for the FEMA/NAZI camps and Ron Paul's attempt to expose it...

I offer an appropriate analogy regarding this false narrative today and another in 1930's Germany:

Ron Paul is racist = Arbeit Macht Frei!



This Black man ain't drinking the kool-aid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1uc7x4a8SM

Offline decemberfellow

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,065
Re: Hey, CNN? Can We Talk About What’s Going On Between You And Ron Paul?
« Reply #14 on: December 23, 2011, 01:53:59 PM »
This Black man ain't drinking the kool-aid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1uc7x4a8SM


BEAUTIFUL  JUST BEAUTIFUL   Ron Paul 2012.


Rev21:4
And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.


Who am I
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Fk6dt_uHo