PrisonPlanet Forum
May 23, 2013, 02:42:34 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: British Spy Obama/Soetoro signs illegal NDAA for NATO extermination of Americans  (Read 34108 times)
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #160 on: December 18, 2011, 08:36:50 AM »

Ok , this has to be said and I guess I will be the one to  do it as many are afraid to speak their mind openly.Censorship is still alive in America.

have a Trial for  everyone of the TREASONOUS bastards that wrote or voted for the Bill as the have committed Treason against the United sates.  Gallows for those found guilty.

We all should have already grabbed our firearms and been headed for D.C. to remove them from office by force if they do not want to resign and surrender their ill gotten gains $$$$$, denounce their citizenship and leave the country for eternity.

But Instead we sit and complain at our keyboards like good Cyber warriors that the Government loves, we complain but thats all we do. Then in a week or month they will come up with another unconstitutional Law to strip us of more rights,Liberty and Freedom and we will forget about the NDAA Bill and bitch about it instead.

just like when we all complained about the Patriot act. healthcare reform, assault weapon ban, etc as they keep doing the same thing to us and we gripe about but never doing anything except be complacent.
Come on Patriots , open your eyes and see it’s a game they play with us and they have us chasing our tails laughing at us.

Our Bill Of Rights is being shredded, stomped on, abolished and people care more about watching some stupid TV show or football game? That is just so wrong it’s not even funny.

Will you wait until they come and take away one of your neighbors or family members before you take action? By then it will be too late as the seed of corruption will have grown into forest .
Better to make some sacrifices now and fight for your rights than live as a subject on your knees and try to remember what Freedom or Liberty felt like from memory.

Think about what I have said, but don’t take too long as we do not have much time left to take action .

Nailer45
Patriot to my last dying Breath.

Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #161 on: December 18, 2011, 09:45:12 AM »

Should it not be listed on one of these pages?

Pending Legislation

http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/pending-legislation

Signed Legislation

http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/signed-legislation

Vetoed Legislation

http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/vetoed-legislation
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
pac522
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2,562


Peace sells, but who's buying?


« Reply #162 on: December 18, 2011, 11:51:11 AM »

Ok , this has to be said and I guess I will be the one to  do it as many are afraid to speak their mind openly.Censorship is still alive in America.

have a Trial for  everyone of the TREASONOUS bastards that wrote or voted for the Bill as the have committed Treason against the United sates.  Gallows for those found guilty.

We all should have already grabbed our firearms and been headed for D.C. to remove them from office by force if they do not want to resign and surrender their ill gotten gains $$$$$, denounce their citizenship and leave the country for eternity.

But Instead we sit and complain at our keyboards like good Cyber warriors that the Government loves, we complain but thats all we do. Then in a week or month they will come up with another unconstitutional Law to strip us of more rights,Liberty and Freedom and we will forget about the NDAA Bill and bitch about it instead.

just like when we all complained about the Patriot act. healthcare reform, assault weapon ban, etc as they keep doing the same thing to us and we gripe about but never doing anything except be complacent.
Come on Patriots , open your eyes and see it’s a game they play with us and they have us chasing our tails laughing at us.

Our Bill Of Rights is being shredded, stomped on, abolished and people care more about watching some stupid TV show or football game? That is just so wrong it’s not even funny.

Will you wait until they come and take away one of your neighbors or family members before you take action? By then it will be too late as the seed of corruption will have grown into forest .
Better to make some sacrifices now and fight for your rights than live as a subject on your knees and try to remember what Freedom or Liberty felt like from memory.

Think about what I have said, but don’t take too long as we do not have much time left to take action .

Nailer45
Patriot to my last dying Breath.



Like I've said before, we haven't seen absolute Despotism yet. Not enough people are suffering, but soon, soon they will be. And that's when hope will be won. Because all will not be lost, because we have the blueprint. We are going to find out what the Brotherhood of Man is really about, not some UN mandate, phony resolution, bombs for peace.
Logged

This country did not achieve greatness with the mindset of "safety first" but rather "live free or die".

Truth is the currency of love. R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution!

We are all running on Gods laptop.
The problem is the virus called the Illuminati.  ~EvadingGrid

The answer to 1984 is 1776.
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #163 on: December 19, 2011, 07:50:57 AM »

Bribe money is why certain elected officials voted for NDAA Bill. It proves that they are only casting votes for their own personal gain ( bank accounts stuffed with Bribe money ) rather than vote to protect the Constitution and we he people.

On Thursday, Anonymous hacktivists launched a campaign against Senator Robert Portman, a Republican from Ohio. Not only did Portland vote in favor of NDAA FY2012, he received $272,853 from special interest groups that also backed the bill.
http://rt.com/usa/news/anonymous-congres...-sopa-013/


NDAA Bill 2012 : Indefinite Detention Act Creators, Senators Get Paid $ 500 K From Lobbyist Says Anonymous .

The next lawmaker to receive anywhere near as much as Sen. Portman is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada and third-ranked official in Congress, who pulled in more than $100,000 less than his Ohio counterpart with $172,635.

http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2011/12/natio...t-aka.html
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #164 on: December 19, 2011, 08:15:00 AM »

VET SOLDIER says the Military is waking up to - FEMA camps and NDAA Reality!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...ys9djaxkDw
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #165 on: December 20, 2011, 03:33:24 AM »



Joseph Dyer
 
NATIONAL PATRIOT ALERT - LEVEL TWO ALERT STATUS - TROOPS DEPLOY IN LOUISIANA
 
DECEMBER 20, 2011 1:56 A.M EST
 
THIS NATIONAL PATRIOT ALERT MESSAGE IS BEING SENT OUT DUE TO AN IMMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE IN ORLEANS PARISH OF NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA.
 
DUE TO AN APPARENT ELEVATED LEVEL IN CRIMINAL ACTIVITY THAT HAS RESULTED IN THE SHOOTING DEATH OF A SMALL CHILD IN ORLEANS PARISH......STATE REP. AUSTIN BADEN HAS CALLED UPON GOVERNOR JINDAL TO DEPLOY NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS IN THE CITY TO POLICE CIVILIANS.
 
THIS ACTION HAS THE DIRECT POTENTIAL AT THIS TIME TO RESULT IN A REPEAT OF EVENTS THAT TOOK PLACE IN NEW ORLEANS DURING THE HURRICANE KATRINA INCIDENT, WHEREBY DIRECT GUN CONFISCATIONS AND CIVIL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED.
 
PLEASE GO TO THE WEB SITE FOR MORE DETAILS TO THIS REPORT
 
THE TROOPS ARE ACTUALLY ON THE STREETS OF NEW ORLEANS RIGHT NOW, DESPITE THAT THE LOCAL NEWS CHANNEL OMITTED THIS FACT IN THEIR WEBSITE BROADCASTS EARLIER THIS EVENING...........
 
WE HAVE INCLUDED THE VIDEO EVIDENCE OF THE NATIONAL GUARD ON THE STREETS WHICH WAS ONLY BROADCASTED LOCALLY AND NOT ON THE TV STATION WEB SITE.......
 
http://www.watchmenofamerica.com/PATRIOT-ALERT-SYSTEM.html
 
SENTINEL.CMD.1 WatchmenOfAmerica.com


video of troops policing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtOsP_xtZIs&feature=player_embedded
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Kilika
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8,865

Thank you Jesus!


« Reply #166 on: December 20, 2011, 04:15:26 AM »

Quote

Quote
For his part, mayor Landrieu says the National Guard is already involved in the city's battle against violent crime.

Quote
...helping the NOPD with logistics and intelligence in the effort to bring violent criminals to justice

It appears to me that they aren't saying the troops are on the ground right now. They are admitting the NG is helping the NOPD, but the video doesn't match the story, again! There is no telling where the footage is from. I personally think it's a violation of the Constitution even if it's logistics, but they think otherwise.
Logged

"For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows."
1 Timothy 6:10 (KJB)
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #167 on: December 21, 2011, 02:20:19 AM »

.

Ron Paul explains his opposition to the NDAA 12/19/11  Grin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z8bbuMQLlqs#!
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #168 on: December 22, 2011, 03:56:12 AM »

heads up everyone for some reading.

ttp://publicintelligence.info/NCR%20Pil...20(v2).pdf
http://publicintelligence.info/fema-requ...elligence/
whoa, open that. looks what will show up on a printout of all transponders it was public but then FEMA wrote to the website and said that it was now classified and to remove it
"Operation Rendezvous"
http://publicintelligence.info/19699407272009011351952.PDF

COG ACTIVATED ( Continuity of Government  )
Diagrams at link that are very explanatory. http://investmentwatchblog.com/exclusive...-collapse/

FEMA Continuity of Government Plans Prep Total Takeover of Society, Dispatching Military Domestically Under Economic Collapse Emergency
Aaron Dykes and Alex Jones Infowars.com December 21, 2011
"Hold onto your seats. The plan for the takeover of the United States has not only been drafted, but activated. Our sources and independent research make this abundantly clear. Martial law scenarios preparing for a breakdown of order under the ongoing economic collapse are underway, even as pretexts for control are initiated in locales across the country. Bold individuals like Ron Paul have warned that dangerous legislation like the NDAA designate the American population as potential enemies. Now, there is more evidence this targeting of the people is sadly taking place.
A laundry list of operations organized under FEMA’s National Continuity Programs (NCP) provides a base of technical support for the deployment of national emergency plans and the logistical tracking of all personnel incorporated under what Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano has lovingly termed the big “federal family.”
“Friendly” military and FEMA personnnel, along with their contracted employees and those of other federal agencies, will carry transponder ID badges, like those described here, to designate their “blue” inclusive status. As our military sources have confirmed, under the Blue Force Situational Awareness (BFSA) all other American citizens and civilians are designated under the “red” category and treated as an enemy or potential unfriendly. Throughout his past investigative work including witnessing numerous military drills, Alex Jones has also witnessed the technology and the use of this alarming code branding ordinary Americans as battlefield enemies. The plan includes drone and other high-tech tools to monitor and target individuals designated under the “enemy” status.
The military’s blue force tracking technology has been adopted since 2003 in Iraq and used intheaters like Afghanistan to quickly distinguish “Blue” friendlies (including U.S. forces and allies like tribal forces) from “Red” enemies. However, on the U.S. homeland battlefield, it is the American people who will be designated under “red,” whereas cleared occupyingpersonnel are tracked as “blue” friendlies by their ID transponder badges. The designation was set-up to reduce “friendly fire” incidents.

There are many of  positions being offered.
 
 
 
NEW JOB http://jobs.cgi.com/job/Twentynine-Palms...7/1457349/
"Blue Force Tracker Technician Job Apply now »
Date: Dec 19, 2011
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA, USJob Order: J0911-0586 - Permanent Full Time Title: Blue Force Tracker Technician Category: Consulting / Business / Functional City: Twentynine Palms, California, United States
Job Description: Blue Force Tracker Technician
Stanley Associates (wholly owned subsidiary of CGI Federal) is looking for a Blue Force Tracker Technician opportunity in Twentynine Palms, CA. - The Blue Force Tracker Technician is responsible for testing, troubleshooting, assembling, and installing/de-installing Blue Force Situational Awareness (BFSA) Family of Systems (FoS) and components. - Technicians will travel as required to CONUS and OCONUS locations to provide support for the BFSA project. - Technicians must be willing to travel overseas for durations of up to 1 year. - Technicians are responsible for preparing the equipment for install, conducting the install, testing newly installed systems, troubleshooting any discrepancies, recommending disposition or replacing parts as required, and turning completed vehicles over to the end customer. - Technicians are also responsible for testing various BFSA FoS components for acceptance upon receipt and before issuance to the fleet. Technicians are responsible for maintaining test records and providing reports upon request.
Specific Duties:
- Assembling Blue Force Tracker systems to include the buildup of HMMWV racks. - Installing Blue Force Tracker systems into various vehicles to include but not limited to, HMMWVs, MRAPs, LAVs, and AAVs. - Performing 100% acceptance/issuance testing of BFSA Family of Systems assets received. - Testing Blue Force Tracker assets returned from the field and maintaining records of all tested equipment. - Maintaining records of all tested and refurbished BFSA system assets. - Reporting and returning Not Ready for Issue assets when identified. - Perform any necessary troubleshooting and repairs during the test and checkout of newly produced systems. Requirements High School Diploma or GED equivalent and a minimum of 2 years of directly related Blue Force Tracker work experience required."


 
 
 

Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #169 on: December 22, 2011, 04:16:53 AM »

Yes they talk about it being used on Americans.

NDAA, Indefinite Detention On CBSNews  .

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTABgc4MqPM&feature=player_embedded

December 21, 2011 - Fordham University professor Annmarie McAvoy discusses the National Defense Authorization Act. The bill includes a provision that gives the federal government the power to arrest and detain terror suspects indefinitely.
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #170 on: December 22, 2011, 04:36:32 AM »

Jonathan Turley talked about his recent Washington Post piece looking at the issues of surveillance and privacy and U.S. citizens' loss of privacy protections
 
 
 
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/PrivacyIssues4
 
Turley:
 ■Is the second most cited law professor in the country
 ■Has worked as both the CBS and NBC legal analyst during national controversies
 ■Ranks 38th in the top 100 most cited ‘public intellectuals’ in a recent study by a well-known judge
 ■Is one of the top 10 lawyers handling military cases
 ■Has served as a consultant on homeland security and constitutional issues
 ■Is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #171 on: December 23, 2011, 02:14:33 AM »

My point has now been proven and it's sad to see it proven..

This thread is no longer on the front page as people have already found something new to complain about, giving  credit to one of my earlier posts stating that the instant some new topic came up that people would forget about the NDAA/ HR 1540 Bill and become enthralled in some new unimportant topic.

So what is more important to you?

chevy volt costing taxpayers $$$, like it's anything new ( corporate corruption ).

Having your rights abolished when Obama signs NDAA Bill into LAW.

slutwalk goes to DC.

greek budget BS..
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #172 on: December 23, 2011, 03:39:30 AM »

Holder: Obama Will Issue Signing Statement With NDAA Detention Rules
Attorney General Eric Holder confirmed speculation Wednesday that President Barack Obama would issue a signing statement when he makes the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and its controversial detention provisions law.

“We made really substantial progress in moving from something that was really unacceptable to the administration to something with which we still have problems,” Holder said in response to a question from the Wall Street Journal’s Evan Perez. “But I think through these procedures, with these regulations we will be crafting, we can minimize the problems that will actually affect us in an operational way.”


http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/holder_obama_will_issue_signing_statement_with_ndaa.php
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Effie Trinket
member
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,203



« Reply #173 on: December 23, 2011, 01:25:47 PM »

From:  http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=140755481

"The geeks at Anonymous probably think they are having more fun publishing the Twitter handles of the 83 senators who approved the NDAA, National Defense Authorization Act, last Thursday, on Bill of Rights Day, which okays indefinite military detention of American citizens without charge or trial.  But buried in the information dump is a truly amazing piece of information, which could have been put together from public records, but which Anonymous actually brought to the fore.

Anonymous singles out Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) for receiving a particularly large sum from companies and PACs lobbying for the NDAA.  From the RT report:

Quote
Robert J. Portman...we are truly disturbed by the ludicrous $272,853 he received from special interest groups supporting the NDAA bill that authorizes the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens on U.S. soil.

Even in Washington terms, over a quarter million is a ridiculous amount of money from special interest groups supporting an issue to any single legislator.  Congressmen have been bought for far less, with around $50,000 considered a serious ante at anyone's table, and much less merely keeping you in the game.  

Then RT reports:
Quote
“Among the supporters of NDAA are California-based manufacturer Surefire, L.L.C., who won a $23 million contract from the Department of Defense three months ago.

OpenSecrets.org shows Surefire lobbying for HR 1540 which is the House counterpart to the Senate bill, S. 1867, which was passed on Bill of Rights Day and which two retired Marine generals affirm, in a New York Times op-ed, abolishes the Bill of Rights.  Retired four-star Generals Charles Krulak and Joseph Hoar write in opposing the new law:

Quote
One provision would authorize the military to indefinitely detain without charge people suspected of involvement with terrorism, including United States citizens apprehended on American soil. Due process would be a thing of the past.

From the guardian of democracy OpenSecrets.org:



Surefire retains DC lobbyists Upstream Consulting to do its lobbying on Capitol Hill.

So what does Surefire make?  In a word, night-raid equipment, with a fresh new $23 million contract from the DoD even as we saw troops pulling out of Iraq and they are about to pull out of Afghanistan.  The product catalog main categories read things like "weapon lights, helmet lights, sound suppressors, high capacity magazines."  The equipment is relatively cheap, not big ticket items in Defense Department terms.  That means this is a big contract.  A $23 million contract would buy enough of these things to outfit maybe 50,000 soldiers.

If we are pulling out of Iraq and Afghanistan, what is all this stuff for?  Night-raid gear?  These are basically made to blind people as they awake from you busting down their door, not for open combat.  In a night firefight you don't want any lights near you whatsoever.  That gives the other guy an easy target.

This is as Obama is about to sign NDAA into law, if he hasn't already at the time of this writing, the unconstitutional detention provisions of which we now know he specifically requested.  We know because some sharp-eyed CSPAN junkie flicked on the record switch when she heard Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) saying these words.  Levin on the Senate floor during debate:

Quote
Sen. Levin (addressing Senate president): "And I'm wondering whether the senator is familiar with the fact that the language, the language which precluded the application of section 1031 to American citizens was in the bill that we originally approved in the Armed Services Committee, and the administration asked us to remove the language which says that US citizens and lawful residents would not be subject to this section?

Is the senator familiar with the fact that it was the administration which asked us to remove the very language we had in the bill which passed the committee and that we removed it at the request of the administration... that would have said that this determination would not apply to US citizens and lawful residents? I'm just wondering is the senator familiar with the fact it was the administration which asked us to remove the very language [excluding US citizens], the absence of which, is now objected to by the senator from Illinois?"

The Hive Daily gives a fuller report on this at "Military Contractors Funded Detention Bill."

Image from Surefire marketing video:


From SureFire catalog "Weapon Lights":


SureFire Marketing Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzbuu2mcM9c

Merry NDAA Christmas Charlie Brown! Recall the Traitors Who Voted Yes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4e0hdDHy10

Recall the traitors Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Recall-Every-Congressman-Who-Voted-for-the-NDAA/248343955227401[/QUOTE]
Logged
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #174 on: December 24, 2011, 03:36:29 AM »

Almost Any American Could Be Arbitrarily Labeled a “Terrorist”
 
As I’ve previously noted, this is especially concerning when almost any American could be labeled a “terrorist” if the government doesn’t happen to like them:
 

It is dangerous in a climate where you can be labeled as or suspected of being a terrorist simply for questioning war, protesting anything, asking questions about pollut..., orstocking up on more than 7 days of food. [And the FBI says that activists who investigate factory farms can be prosecuted as terror....] And see this.
 
And it is problematic in a period in which FBI agents and CIA intelligence officials, constitutional law exper... have all said that U.S. government officials “were trying to create an atmosphere of fear in which the American people would give them more power”, and even former Secretary of Homeland Security – Tom Ridge – admitst hat he was pressured to raise terror alerts to help Bush win reelection.
 
And it is counter-productive in an age when the government – instead of doing the things which could actually make us safer – are doing things which increasethe risk of terrorism.
 
And it is insane in a time of perpetual war. See this, this, this and this.
 
And when the “War on Terror” in the Middle East and North Africa which is being used to justify the attack on Americans was planned long before 9/11.
 
And when Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser told the Senate in 2007 that the war on terror is “a mythical historical narrative”. And 9/11 was entirely foreseeable, but wasn’t stopped. Indeed, no one in Washington even wants to hear how 9/11 happened, even though that is necessary to stop future te.... And the military has bombed a bunch of oil-rich countries when it could have instead taken out Bin Ladenyears ago.
 
***
 
And – given that U.S. soldiers admit that if they accidentally kill innocent Iraqis ... – it is unlikely that the government would ever admit that an American citizen it assassinated was an innocent civilian who has nothing at all to do with terrorism.
 
 
 
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/12/constitutional-expert-presid...
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #175 on: December 24, 2011, 10:26:20 AM »

Obama hates christmas, BUT he will celebrate Ramadan.  Angry

http://whitehouse.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/01/obama-marks-ramadan/

CNN White House Producer Alexander Mooney

President Obama Monday is marking the beginning of Ramadan, the month-long Muslim holiday of fasting and reflection.
 
In a statement issued by the White House, the president said, "Times like this remind us of the lesson of all great faiths, including Islam - that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us."
 
He also said he will be hosting an iftar dinner at the White House, an event he hosted last year as well.


Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #176 on: December 24, 2011, 11:36:40 AM »

Is this what I think it is?
 
 
 
After he signed the omnibus into law Friday, the White House released a concurrent signing statement saying Obama will object to portions of the legislation on constitutional grounds.
Signing statements are highly controversial, and their legality is disputed.
"I have advised the Congress that I will not construe these provisions as preventing me from fulfilling my constitutional responsibility to recommend to the Congress's consideration such measures as I shall judge necessary and expedient," Obama said in a statement as he signed the bill into law.

The signing statement says that on the issue of accused terrorist detainees, Obama will interpret and apply provisions that bar the transfer of detainees from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, "in a manner that avoids constitutional conflicts." Obama also objected to Defense provisions in the bill that limit the president's ability to put troops under foreign command and require 30 days advance notice to Congress for any use of the military which would involve more than $100,000 in construction costs.
 [link to thehill.com]
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/bu...of-omnibus
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #177 on: December 24, 2011, 12:01:55 PM »

Terrorist Identification Chart.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DknlIKhZD-E&feature=player_embedded
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #178 on: December 24, 2011, 12:19:08 PM »

the future outlook of suspected American terrorists. pic at link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Camp_x-ray_detainees.jpg
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Effie Trinket
member
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,203



« Reply #179 on: December 25, 2011, 09:26:43 PM »

Here's the official congressional debate on this.

Would be nice to get some hardcore analysis of all this, particularly to show exactly how these people are lying in every detail:

Congressional Record
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2011_cr/defauth.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/74306946/Congressional-Record-29-Nov-2011-S7956-S7987-re-National-Defense-Authorization-Act-for-FY-2012
Logged
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #180 on: December 26, 2011, 06:40:38 PM »


I have never seen a movie so accurately describe what is going on in the near future.  Show this to as many people as possible, this movie was made with a budget of $25,000 and was released in 1971 (almost 40 years ago).  Please see this movie as soon as you can  I really do feel this movie is critical to see.


-----------------------------------------------------------



Punishment Park is a 1971 film written and directed by Peter Watkins. It is a pseudo documentary of a British and West German film crew following National Guard soldiers and police as they pursue a group of members of the counterculture across the desert.Contents

Plot
The movie takes place in 1970. The Vietnam War is escalating and United States President Richard Nixon has just decided on a "secret" bombing campaign in Cambodia. Faced with a growing anti-war movement,

President Nixon decrees a state of emergency based on the McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950, which authorizes federal authorities, without reference to Congress, to detain persons judged to be a "risk to internal security".

Members from the anti-war movement, civil rights movement, feminist movement, conscientious objectors, and Communist party, mostly University students, are arrested and face an emergency tribunal made up of community members. With state and federal jails at their top capacity, the convicted face the option of spending their full conviction time in federal prison or three days at Punishment Park. There, they will have to traverse 60 miles of the hot California desert in three days, without water or food, while being chased by National Guardsmen and law enforcement officers as part of their field training. If they succeed and reach the American flag at the end of the course, they will be set free. If they fail by getting "arrested", they will serve the remainder of their sentence in federal prison.

European filmmakers follow two groups of detainees as part of their documentary; while Group 637 starts their three day ordeal and learn the rules of the "game", the civilian tribunal begins hearings on Group 638. The film makers conduct interviews with members of Group 637 and their chasers, documenting how both sides become increasingly hostile towards the other. Meanwhile, back at the tent, the film crew documents the trial of Group 638 as they argue their case in vain for resisting the war in Vietnam. The first group splinters into one group that refuses to accept the rules of the game and tries to resist with violence and another group that goes on towards the goal. The violent group are all killed. As the others comes near the flag they find a group of police waiting for them; it turns out that there is no way to win the Punishment Park course as the system controls it from start to finish.



http://www.mininova.org/tor/427583

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3847019/Peter_Watkins_-_Punishment_park___2_shorts_films

http://onebigtorrent.org/torrents/4886/The-Punishment-Park-

http://www.movshare.net/video/6jmjy55bfgfcu#

http://www.zshare.net/video/628156180546e411/

http://dekyosmovieblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/punishment-park-1971.html

There is some information about the director Peter Watkins here

Punishment Park - Interment Camps, Thought Crime & The McCarran Act 1950
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=35279.msg151352#msg151352

Unfortunately the links on this page are dead.



Later comment by me after seeing it a few times:

In my opinion, everyone should see this movie. the mastery of the director gave various points of view from a wide array of social characters. someone mentioned about the rich money going to the poor and that is an opinion of that person from their angle of life. the young soldier that killed the guy and his reaction afterward and the hippie that says the cops are just doing a job and he does not blame them are also great points of view shown in the movie.

punishment park shows a system, one that we are heading to IMO.  No one likes it, not one person but they all have been so compartmentalized they cannot see how they are all the same in essence, they are all human beings. I think people seeing the movie get a bird's eye view, can see that the country is heading to this dystopia and might just be able to break out of the compartmentalization. there are no villains in the hollywood sense, even the cop that likes shooting shotguns, what is wrong with that, but put him in the matrix compartmentalized and he becomes a semi-villain.,  but the real villain of the movie is the system, and that is what needs to be exposed (and the f**ktard social architects that build these instruments of tyranny).

i believe that is the ultimate danger of this film to the NWO and why it should be viewed by everyone with as little comments as necessary.  let people see it for themselves and make up their own mind. i doubt anyone will be unaffected by this movie and the obvious move towards this social system in the near future.

It looks like this old Kissinger/Nixon plan (created by the bankers) is now being attempted via project Northwoods type low level false flags all over the place.

Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #181 on: December 28, 2011, 02:35:14 AM »

This sounds Familiar. Hmm did CONgress,Senate travel back in time and help the Nazi's write it up.
 
 
 
The Enabling Act (in German: Ermächtigungsgesetz) was passed by the Reichstag on March 23, 1933. It was the second major step after the Reichstag Fire Decree through which the Nazis legally established Nazi Germany by giving the Chancellor (then Adolf Hitler) dictatorial powers over Germany.
 
The full name of the Enabling Act was Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich (Law to remedy the misery of the people and the country).
 
As with most of the laws passed in the process of Gleichschaltung, the Enabling Act is quite short, considering its consequences. It shall therefore be reproduced in full:
 



German
 

English Translation
 



1. Reichsgesetze können außer in dem in der Reichsverfassung vorgesehenen Verfahren auch durch die Reichsregierung beschlossen werden. Dies gilt auch für die in den Artikeln 85 Abs. 2 und 87 der Reichsverfassung bezeichneten Gesetze.
 

1. Other than through the procedure prescribed by the constitution [i.e. decision by parliament], laws of the Reich may be decided upon by the government of the Reich as well. This includes laws as referred to by articles 85 subsection 2 and 87 of the constitution. [These articles refer to the parliamentary budget rights.]
 



2. Die von der Reichsregierung beschlossenen Reichsgesetze können von der Reichsverfassung abweichen, soweit sie nicht die Einrichtung des Reichstags und des Reichsrats als solche zum Gegenstand haben. Die Rechte des Reichspräsidenten bleiben unberührt.
 

2. Laws decided upon by the government of the Reich may deviate from the provisions of the constitution as long as they do not affect the institutions of the Reichstag and the Reichsrat as such. The constitutional rights of the Reichspräsident shall remain intact.
 



3. Die von der Reichsregierung beschlossenen Reichsgesetze werden vom Reichskanzler ausgefertigt und im Reichsgesetzblatt verkündet. Sie treten, soweit sie nichts anderes bestimmen, mit dem auf die Verkündung folgenden Tage in Kraft. Die Artikel 68 bis 77 der Reichsverfassung finden auf die von der Reichsregierung beschlossenen Gesetze keine Anwendung.
 

3. Laws decided upon by the government of the Reich shall be issued by the Chancellor [i.e. Hitler] and announced in the Reich Law Gazette. They shall take effect on the day following the announcement, unless they prescribe a different date. The articles 68 to 77 of the constitution shall not be applied to laws decided upon by the government of the Reich. [These articles regulate the ordinary procedure of legislation.]
 



4. Verträge des Reiches mit fremden Staaten, die sich auf Gegenstände der Reichsgesetzgebung beziehen, bedürfen für die Dauer der Geltung dieser Gesetze nicht der Zustimmung der an der Gesetzgebung beteiligten Körperschaften. Die Reichsregierung erläßt die zur Durchführung dieser Verträge erforderlichen Vorschriften.
 

4. Contracts of the Reich with foreign states which affect matters of Reich legislation shall not require the approval of the bodies concerned with legislation. The government of the Reich shall issue the prescriptions required for the execution of such contracts.
 



5. Dieses Gesetz tritt mit dem Tage seiner Verkündung in Kraft. Es tritt mit dem 1. April 1937 außer Kraft, es tritt ferner außer Kraft, wenn die gegenwärtige Reichsregierung durch eine andere abgelöst wird.
 

5. This law shall take effect with the day of its announcement. It shall become invalid on April 1, 1937 or earlier, if the present Reich government is succeeded by a different one.
 

While there had been previous enabling acts in the history of the Weimar Republic, this one was far more reaching since Article 2 allowed for changing the constitution as well. The law therefore formally required a two-thirds majority in the Reichstag. Hitler had taken care of that though: by the powers provided of the Reichstag Fire Decree, most of the Communist Party deputies were already jailed, and those mandates were declared "dormant" through a change of the Reichstag rules of procedure. The remaining members of parliament were intimidated by the SA surrounding the parliament hall. In the end, only the Social Democrats voted against the bill.
 
It is indicative of the care that the Nazis took to give their dictatorship an appearance of legality that the Enabling Act was formally prolonged twice by the Reichstag beyond the 1937 date.
 
After the Enabling Act, the KPD and SPD were outlawed. Another law from July 14, 1933 prevented the foundation of new political parties. See Gleichschaltung for more information about the subsequent steps.
 
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Enabling_Act
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #182 on: December 28, 2011, 02:58:15 AM »

Has this bill been signed? I see H.R. 1540 on the White House website as pending but the Omnibus bill has already been signed and lists the NDAA. It seems to me that signing this bill amounts to Treason!
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #183 on: December 28, 2011, 03:36:45 AM »

The Bill of Rights is no more. On December 15th, 2011 at the hands of a metastasizing malignancy, masquerading as purveyors of freedom, whatever hope we had of liberty and the pursuit of peace was officially assassinated. We are now a police state.

Overwhelming feelings of searing rage and disgust at the wicked abomination that is our Congress and President cannot be contained. Our government, courts, military and law enforcement — which have been controlled by socio/psychopaths for decades — continues to decompose into a rabid, sleazy, moronic, delusional group of arrogant, self-serving, sycophantic, greedy, whores.

They have betrayed the American citizenry, as they have the rest of the world. They have defiled and destroyed the Constitution. They have committed treason. They are grinding the 99% into the ground with every stroke of the pen; every vote cast in the name of enriching their corporate umbilical cords and bank accounts. They do not deserve respect. They are thieves who have hijacked their positions of power. They deserve exactly what the National Defense Authorization Act will now so freely foist upon the rest of us — to be tossed into a hole to rot somewhere without benefit of charges, trial, or protection from torture and murder, for the rest of their miserable, worthless existences.

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2011/12/26/...ent-camps/
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #184 on: December 28, 2011, 09:24:44 AM »

Excellent Resource---500 Military Manuals Online and FREE!

A wealth of information that military researchers spent millions to put together.
Check it out.
http://www.survivalebooks.com/usmilitarymanuals.html
 a few listed.

2008 US Army  TRAINING FOR FULL SPECTRUM OPERATIONS 96.pdf

 

2008 US Army Conference of European Armies 4p.pdf

 

2008 US Army ETO Engineer Technical Policies 50p.pdf

 

2008 US Army FM 3-07 STABILITY OPERATIONS SymposuimDraft 175p.pdf

 

2008 US Army Knowledge Management Section 70p.pdf
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #185 on: December 28, 2011, 10:53:09 AM »

2nd manual link.

http://www.grandpappy.info/indexhar.htm
This page contains many military manuals. They are large in size, some over 264 megabytes.


How to Survive Hard Times
 by Robert Wayne Atkins, P.E.
http://www.grandpappy.info/indexhar.htm
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #186 on: December 28, 2011, 10:56:09 AM »

Excellent Resource---500 Military Manuals Online and FREE!

A wealth of information that military researchers spent millions to put together.
Check it out.
http://www.survivalebooks.com/usmilitarymanuals.html
 a few listed.

2008 US Army  TRAINING FOR FULL SPECTRUM OPERATIONS 96.pdf

 

2008 US Army Conference of European Armies 4p.pdf

 

2008 US Army ETO Engineer Technical Policies 50p.pdf

 

2008 US Army FM 3-07 STABILITY OPERATIONS SymposuimDraft 175p.pdf

 

2008 US Army Knowledge Management Section 70p.pdf


this one has got to be for those FEMA camp directors.
2007 US Army Soldiers Manual & Trainers Guide, Mortuary Affairs Specialist Levels 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5  374p.pdf

http://www.survivalebooks.com/free%20manuals/2007%20US%20Army%20Soldiers%20Manual%20&%20Trainers%20Guide,%20Mortuary%20Affairs%20Specialist%20Levels%201,%202,%203,%204%20&%205%20%20374p.pdf
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
global_fiefdom
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 720


« Reply #187 on: December 28, 2011, 02:40:35 PM »

Army Regulation 210–35
Installations
Civilian Inmate
Labor Program


http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/R210_35.PDF

(1) Inmates are not Department of the Army employees and are not regarded as such. Inmates must not be referred
to as employees. They will not be paid from Department of the Army funds, nor receive any personal or private
gratuity for work accomplished or services rendered. Interservice, interagency, or interdepartmental support agreements
and/or memoranda of agreement with the corrections facility must not create any appearance of employment of
inmates.

(2) Installation commanders have authority to determine and absorb nominal costs associated with their civilian
inmate labor programs. Nominal costs are minor costs incidental to civilian inmate labor program operations. Nominal
costs may be costs for equipment, materials, and supplies used in inmate labor details, program administration,
telephone calls to corrections facilities, lunch time meals, transporting inmates to and from corrections facilities, and
other similar costs addressed in paragraph 4–3, below. Installations may absorb nominal costs associated with their
program on a nonreimbursable basis. However, installation commanders will not reimburse the corrections facility for
inmate labor, either as payment of funds or establishing credits in memoranda of agreement or ISAs as payment for
inmate labor.
(3) Inmates are not allowed to operate Army vehicles or equipment unless they possess the necessary valid
operator’s licenses, have been given proper training in vehicle operation and safety by Army personnel in accordance
with AR 600–55, and are authorized to operate the vehicle or equipment by both the installation and the corrections
facility.
(4) Operation of Army vehicles by inmates is permitted only when absolutely necessary for completion of work.
Inmates will not be permitted to operate vehicles unless in a secured area or under direct observation of installation or
corrections facility personnel. Training to operate Army unique vehicles and/or equipment should be provided by the
Army.
(5) No personal vehicles will be used to transport inmates to and/or from corrections facilities, or to and/or from
work sites.
(6) Enforcement of inventory, control, issuance, and return of hand tools and equipment provided for inmate labor
details must be controlled by installation plans and/or standing procedures.
c. Services provided to installations. Services provided to the installation must be in accordance with 18 USC
4125(a). Such services are constructing or repairing roads; clearing, maintaining, or reforesting public land; building
levees; or constructing or repairing any other public way or works financed wholly or in major part by funds
a p p r o p r i a t e d b y C o n g r e s s . I n m a t e s m a y p e r f o r m c u s t o d i a l t a s k s , b u i l d i n g d e m o l i t i o n , d e b r i s r e m o v a l , m o w i n g ,
landscaping, painting, carpentry, trash pickup, transporting debris to and from recycling centers, and other similar
activities. No other services are allowed by law.
d. Work performed. Work performed by inmates will not interfere nor conflict with approved projects for which
resources have been allocated and funds made available for performance by contract or Army civilian labor force, or
with work which can be accomplished within authorized personnel ceilings. The Civilian Inmate Labor Program was
created to provide installation commanders with an alternate labor source to perform valid requirements. Civilian
inmate labor does not compete with existing in–house or contractor resources.
e. Participants. Only inmates classified as minimum level security will participate in the Civilian Inmate Labor
Program. Minimum level security inmates do not need constant guard. Corrections facilities will be responsible for
ensuring that only minimum level security inmates participate in the inmate labor program and for selecting inmate
participants.
(1) Memoranda of agreement with the corrections facility will state that the installation commander will direct the
removal of any inmate deemed undesirable or detrimental in any way to the mission, soldiers, family members, or
civilian employees of the installation.
(2) Under no circumstances will the following types of inmates be permitted in the Civilian Inmate Labor Program:
(a) A person in whom there is a significant public interest as determined by the corrections facility superintendent in
coordination with the installation commander.
(b) A person who has been a significant management problem in their current corrections facility or in another
facility.
(c) A principal organized crime figure.
(d) An inmate convicted of a sex offense or whose criminal history includes such conduct.
(e) An inmate convicted of a violent crime or whose criminal history includes such conduct.
(f) An inmate convicted of the sale or intent to distribute illegal drugs who held a leadership position in any drug
conspiracy, or has been involved with drugs within the last 3 years while in prison.
(g) An escape risk.
(h) An inmate who poses a threat to the general public as determined by the corrections facility superintendent in
coordination with the installation commander.
AR 210–35 • 14 January 2005 5
(i) An inmate declared or found insane or mentally incompetent by a court, administrative proceeding, or physician,
or under treatment for a mental disease or disorder.
(j) An inmate convicted of arson.
(k) A Federal inmate convicted while on active duty, presently serving a sentence for that conviction.
f. Army personnel. Department of the Army personnel will not be involved with custodial aspects of inmate labor
details.
(a) The Warden and/or Administrator of the local corrections facility is charged with the responsibility and
accountability for the control and custody of inmates on labor details at all times. Any use of Army military or civilian
personnel to guard, control, discipline, or otherwise exercise custodial supervision is prohibited.
(b) Army military or civilian personnel may oversee the work to be performed by inmates or inmate labor details.
Oversight is defined as telling inmates what they must do by specifying work to be accomplished. This oversight
includes training inmates in performing assigned work, using special equipment, and safety precautions. Oversight also
includes showing inmates the location of the work site and performing quality assurance inspections of inmate work to
determine if the work performed meets quality, quantity, and timeliness specifications. Oversight may also include
requiring inmates to sign time cards at intervals established by the Warden and/or Administrator of the local
corrections facility. If an inmate cannot be located to sign a time card or is otherwise found missing from an assigned
work area, Army personnel will immediately notify the local corrections facility point of contact staff supervisor and
the installation military police.
g. Property damage. Generally, any interference with or damage to property under control of the Department of the
Army, incident to the execution of inmate labor details, will be promptly corrected by the corrections facility as
directed by the installation commander. However, the installation commander has the prerogative to decide first to
thoroughly investigate the incident prior to directing the corrections facility to correct the situation; if the installation
commander opts to first investigate the incident, both Army and corrections facility personnel will participate in the
investigation. If it is determined that the damage or interference resulting in a loss was caused by an inmate or
corrections personnel, both the installation commander and the corrections facility superintendent will be briefed on the
findings, and the installation commander may—
(1) Request the corrections facility to promptly correct the situation.
(2) Direct that the inmate and/or corrections personnel be removed from the installation.
(3) Direct that the program with the corrections facility be discontinued.
(4) Decide on any combination of these options. This does not include damages, breakage, or breakdowns occurring
to equipment or other property due to normal use, or poor and/or unsafe operational condition.
(a) All memoranda of agreement with the corrections facility must contain a clause addressing how property damage
and/or interference will be redressed. An example of this clause is included at appendix B, paragraph 5e. The
aforementioned clause has been used successfully in memoranda of agreement with the FBOP. It is offered as
suggested terminology. There is no specific requirement that the corrections facility be held automatically responsible
for any loss or damage; this should be resolved on a case by case basis by the installation commander.
(b) Investigations may be conducted through AR 15–6 procedures or a report of survey.
h. Operation. The Civilian Inmate Labor Program will operate in such a manner that it will not interfere with the
operation and/or mission of the installation as determined by the installation commander.
i. Safety. Inmate accident compensation procedures set forth at Section 301, Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations
(28 CFR 301) apply to all work performed by FBOP inmates. However, installation commanders should check with
their legal advisor to determine potential liability for injuries, accidents, or deaths caused by FBOP inmates or
corrections facility personnel.
(1) Corrections facilities have their own safety program and will generally provide safety training to all civilian
inmates participating in the inmate labor program. Installations may provide safety equipment; for example, shoes,
goggles, hard hats, and so forth or negotiate this with the corrections facility. Installations providing this equipment
will ensure that the equipment is in safe and serviceable condition.
(2) Installation personnel will provide safety training to inmates and inmate labor details and corrections facility
personnel specific to the type of work being performed. Such safety training will also cover accident and/or hazardous
working conditions reporting. Installations should provide any required special protective equipment, materials, tools,
and supplies in safe and serviceable condition.
(3) Inmate training must include safety instruction as required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) in 29 CFR 1910 which establishes specific training requirements and places the responsibility for such safety
training on the employer (the corrections facility). Inmates will report for work details with this OSHA required
training already completed.
(4) Inmates will not be assigned work which is inherently dangerous, or of high risk; for example, hazardous
materials cleanup, firefighting, and so forth.

l. Training of Army personnel. The corrections facility will provide training and indoctrination to all Army personnel
who will oversee inmate work. Training will cover inmate discipline, staff conduct, inmate accountability, and
corrections facility safety program. This training is mandatory. This training will be provided at no cost to the Army
and at least on an annual basis.

m. Public affairs. Installations will develop a public affairs plan that informs the installation and the surrounding
local community of the program and work projects assigned to civilian inmate labor. This will largely mitigate
potential negative repercussions from using and having inmates present on the installation. Press releases involving
inmates will be issued only by the corrections facility, in coordination with the installation public affairs office, as
corrections facility officials are responsible for protecting the privacy and other rights of inmates. Press releases
regarding the civilian inmate labor program should be coordinated with the corrections facility superintendent. One
copy of the press release will be routed through command channels to HQDA, Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation
Management, Plans and Operations Division (DAIMMD), and HQDA, Office of the Chief of Public Affairs, Public
Communications Division (SAPAPCD). Press releases do not require HQDA approval prior to release.
(1) Media representatives should not be allowed to interview inmates nor take photographs of inmates without the
corrections facility’s and installation public affairs office specific approval.
(2) Requests for interviews or photographs of inmates should be referred to the corrections facility superintendent
and the installation public affairs office.
Logged
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #188 on: December 30, 2011, 01:35:04 PM »

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/thomas

S. 1698: Enemy Expatriation Act

112th Congress: 2011-2012




A bill to add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality.

Sponsor: Sen. Joseph Lieberman [I-CT]

Status: This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Explanation: Introduced bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills and resolutions never make it out of committee. [Last Updated: Oct 18, 2011 6:22AM]



112th CONGRESS




1st Session




S. 1698




To add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality.




IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES




October 12, 2011




Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




A BILL




To add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality.




 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,




SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.




This Act may be cited as the ‘Enemy Expatriation Act’.




SEC. 2. LOSS OF NATIONALITY.




(a) In General- Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481) is amended--




(1) in subsection (a)--




(A) in each of paragraphs (1) through (6), by striking ‘or’ at the end;




(B) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘; or’; and




(C) by adding at the end the following:




‘(Cool engaging in, or purposefully and materially supporting, hostilities against the United States.’; and




(2) by adding at the end the following:




‘(c) For purposes of this section, the term ‘hostilities’ means any conflict subject to the laws of war.’.




(b) Technical Amendment- Section 351(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1483(a)) is amended by striking ‘(6) and (7)’ and inserting ‘(6), (7), and (Cool’.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s112-1698
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #189 on: December 30, 2011, 01:54:29 PM »

top link in last post was incorrect, here is good link.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d112:1:./temp/~bdnCNm:@@@C|/home/LegislativeData.php?n=BSS;c=112|
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Trainwreck
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 299


« Reply #190 on: December 31, 2011, 07:39:56 PM »

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_DEFENSE_BILL?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-12-31-17-42-05

Obviously article was written to be confusing as far as the signing statements and 'changes' made to the act.

Sneaked it through on New Years eve while no one is paying attention.
Logged
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #191 on: December 31, 2011, 07:45:34 PM »

That bastard!
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
Valerius
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,488


« Reply #192 on: December 31, 2011, 07:56:12 PM »

No hope or change.
Logged

"No man can put a chain about the ankle of his fellow man without at last finding the other end fastened about his own neck."  -Frederick Douglass
oyashango
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,445


43 Trillion and counting


« Reply #193 on: December 31, 2011, 08:27:43 PM »

Obama Signs NDAA Indefinite Detention Bill


December 31, 2011

On the eve of 2012, President Obama has, with the stroke of a pen, ended America as we know it.

With the National Defense Authorization Act now signed into law, American citizens can and possibly will be indefinitely detained by the military if they have been “accused” of any terrorist related activity.

In a press release published today, the ACLU further outlined their opposition to this unconstitutional law and highlighted the fact that Obama will now be known as the president who signed  indefinite detention of Americans, far from any battlefield, into law.

    “President Obama’s action today is a blight on his legacy because he will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law,” said Anthony D. Romero, ACLU executive director.

    “The statute is particularly dangerous because it has no temporal or geographic limitations, and can be used by this and future presidents to militarily detain people captured far from any battlefield.  The ACLU will fight worldwide detention authority wherever we can, be it in court, in Congress, or internationally.”

    ******

    “We are incredibly disappointed that President Obama signed this new law even though his administration had already claimed overly broad detention authority in court,” said Romero. “Any hope that the Obama administration would roll back the constitutional excesses of George Bush in the war on terror was extinguished today.

Although the president and the corporate controlled media have tried to pretend that he only signed the bill because Congress took out the indefinite detention provision, the fact remains that this bill DOES give the government the ability to detain any American they claim to be a terrorist without so much as a trial.

Obama’s claim that he had reservations about certain provisions also rings hollow considering the fact that the White House actually asked for the indefinite detention provision to be added to the bill in the first place!

As we all celebrate the new year we must reflect back on 2011 and realize that it is absolutely imperative that we speak out and expose these police state measures like never before.

If we do not, this country will continue on its path towards destruction and before the end of 2012 we could find ourselves in a full scale police state that has completely outlawed the alternative media and free, outside the box thinking.

http://theintelhub.com/2012/01/01/the-end-of-america-as-we-know-it-obama-signs-ndaa-indefinite-detention-bill/
Logged
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #194 on: December 31, 2011, 09:03:25 PM »

Vote Ron Paul!
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
SUPREMEMASTER
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,671


Commander


WWW
« Reply #195 on: December 31, 2011, 09:03:47 PM »

List of Terrorist organizations:


NorthComm

CentComm

AfriComm

Various unknown Black Operations mercenary organizations including "Black Water"

Security and Prosperity Partnership

European Union

J. P. Morgan

Goldman Sachs

Bank of America

Wells Fargo

CitiBank

Bank of England

Central Intelligence Agency

Southern Poverty Law Center


U.S. Elite
Institutions:

Federal Reserve
Business Council
Bilderberg Group
Conference Board
Brookings Institute
Advertising Council
Heritage Foundation
Trilateral Commission
Business Round Table
Chamber of Commerce
Federal Trade Commission
Council on Foreign Relations
American Petroleum Institute
American Enterprise Institute
American Bankers Association
Pharm Research & Manufacturers
Public Relations Society of America
American Psychological Association
Project for a New American Century
Securities and Exchange Commission
Committee for Economic Development
National Association of Manufacturers
Carnegie Foundation
Ford Foundation
Rockefeller foundation
Military Industrial Complex
Media Industrial Complex
Prison Industrial Complex

Committee of 300 (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=173428.0)

Club of Rome

What else am I missing?
Logged

Automatic User Post Signature:
The message has to be put out in the right way.
Website Still Needs to be updated |ActivismOverDrive.comze.net|
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #196 on: December 31, 2011, 09:17:39 PM »

What else am I missing?

CNN
Fox
NBC
CBS
CBC
BBC
ABC
NYT

...
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
decemberfellow
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,338



« Reply #197 on: December 31, 2011, 09:25:04 PM »

Quote
On the eve of 2012, President Obama has, with the stroke of a pen, ended America as we know it.


And with that I will be away from Prison Planet Forum maybe check in near spring  HAPPY NEW YEAR ALL  may God Be with YOU.
Logged

Mark12:
4And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.
 5But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #198 on: December 31, 2011, 09:33:05 PM »


And with that I will be away from Prison Planet Forum maybe check in near spring  HAPPY NEW YEAR ALL  may God Be with YOU.

Me too. Good luck friends!
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #199 on: December 31, 2011, 09:46:50 PM »

This is a long history of illegal fake legislation aimed at ending the constitutional republic.

A bit of hisory into these psychopaths stemming from the National Security Act which has led to the extermination of over 6 million including hundreds of thousands of American citizens for so called 'National Security'.  The treasonous act is a clear and present danger to actual National Security!
Continuity of Operations Plan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuity_of_Operations_Plan

Continuity of Operations (COOP) is a United States Federal initiative, required by Presidential directive, to ensure that agencies are able to continue performance of essential functions under a broad range of circumstances.

National Security Presidential Directive-51 (NSPD-51)/Homeland Security Presidential Directive-20 (HSPD-20), National Continuity Policy, specifies certain requirements for continuity plan development, including the requirement that all Federal executive branch departments and agencies develop an integrated, overlapping continuity capability. FCD 1 also serves as guidance to State, local, and tribal governments.

FEMA has developed Continuity Guidance Circular 1, Continuity Guidance for Non-Federal Agencies (CGC 1). CGC 1 parallels the information in FCD 1 closely, but is geared to States, territories, tribal and local governments, and private-sector organizations [1].

History

A Continuity of Operations Plan (or Continuity of Government Plan) has been a part of government operations since at least the Cold War, when President Dwight D. Eisenhower provided (via executive order) various measures designed to ensure that the government of the United States would be able to continue operating after a nuclear war. These plans were classified for many years, partly under the assumption that knowledge of these plans would enable the Soviet Union to more effectively launch a nuclear attack. In addition, these plans were censored to prevent an uproar among the American public, who (proponents feared) might panic after the revelation that the government was planning for its own survival in a terrifying post-nuclear war environment. With the fall of the Berlin Wall, these plans lost their prominence both in government and in the public consciousness. The Continuity of Operations Plan has seen a return to relevance in the 2000s. After the September 11 attacks, many speculated that terrorists might attempt to destroy a large part of the central government and send the country into chaos. Much of the government's plans for post-nuclear war survival remain secret, and some of the measures that are known are controversial.[citation needed]

These measures included construction of underground facilities such as "Mount Weather", a hollowed-out putatively nuclear-proof mountain in western Virginia with a mailing address in Berryville, Virginia. The public can now tour one such facility, intended to house the entire United States Congress, on the grounds of the Greenbrier Resort in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia. Other provisions of the plans included executive orders that designated certain government officials to assume Cabinet and other executive branch positions and carry out the responsibilities of the position if the primary office holders are killed. There has been a formal line of succession to the presidency since 1792 (currently found in the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, 3 U.S.C. § 19). This runs from the Vice President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, President pro tempore of the Senate, and then through the Cabinet secretaries in a sequence specified by Congress.

Continuity of government plans are not limited to the federal government. The majority of states have constitutional provisions that provide for the succession of government in the event of an "enemy attack."[2]

COG activated

The George W. Bush administration put the Continuity of Operations plan into effect for the first time directly following the September 11 attacks.[3] Their implementation involved a rotating staff of 75 to 150 senior officials and other government workers from every federal executive department and other parts of the executive branch in two secure bunkers on the East Coast. Friends, family and co-workers were only able to reach them through a toll-free number and personal extensions. The Bush administration did not acknowledge the implementation of the COG plan until March 1, 2002.[4][5]

Since September 11, 2001, the newly created Department of Homeland Security has conducted at least three exercises to test continuity plans. The first, named "Forward Challenge '04", took place from May 12 to May 13, 2004, and included more than 40 government agencies.[6] The second major exercise took place from June 20 to June 24, 2005. Titled "Pinnacle", the exercise tested responses to various emergencies, including a hypothetical act of terrorism.[7] "Forward Challenge '06" was the third major exercise, and took place on June 19, 2006. It reportedly involved nearly 4,000 government personnel.[8]

In September 2010, President Barack Obama informed Congress that the State of Emergency in effect since September 14, 2001, will be extended another year.[9] [10] The National Emergencies Act grants various powers to the president during times of emergency,[11] and was intended to prevent a president from declaring a state of emergency of indefinite duration.[12]

In 2007, Professor Larry J. Sabato criticized the incomplete nature of the plan in his book A More Perfect Constitution. In particular, he objected to the fact that there is no Constitutional procedure for replacing U.S. House members in the case of a large-scale attack which could potentially kill a large number of representatives. In regard to the Continuity of Operations Plan, Sabato said it "failed outright" during the September 11 attacks.

The NORAD- and USNORTHCOM-sponsored exercise "Vigilant Shield 2008" took place from October 15 to October 20, 2007.[13]
[edit] Lack of Congressional oversight

On July 18, 2007, Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR), a member of the U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security, requested the classified and more detailed version of the government's continuity of government plan in a letter signed by him and the chairperson of the House Homeland Committee, which is supposed to have access to confidential government information. The president refused to provide the information, to the surprise of the congressional committee.[14][15] As of August 2007, efforts by the committee to secure a copy of the plan continue.[16] [17]
Documents


George W. Bush administration

NSPD 51 National Security Presidential Directive 51, "National Continuity Policy", May 9, 2007 (supersedes Presidential Decision Directive 67) (also known as HSPD 20 "Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20")[18]

Clinton administration

Federal Preparedness Circular 65, "Federal Executive Branch Continuity of Operations (COOP)", July 26, 1999

"Federal Response Plan" [FEMA 9230.1-PL], April 1999

Presidential Decision Directive 67, "Enduring Constitutional Government and Continuity of Government Operations", October 21, 1998

41 Code of Federal Regulations 101-2, "Occupant Emergency Program", revised as of July 1, 1998

36 Code of Federal Regulations 1236, "Management of Vital Records", revised as of July 1, 1998

Presidential Decision Directive 63, "Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP)", May 22, 1998

Presidential Decision Directive 62, "Protection Against Unconventional Threats to the Homeland and Americans Overseas", May 22, 1998

FPC 65 Federal Response Planning Guidance 01-94, "Continuity of Operations (COOP)", December 4, 1994


George H. W. Bush administration

PDD 67 National Security Directive 69, "Enduring Constitutional Government", June 2, 1992

FPC 65 Federal Preparedness Circular 61, "Emergency Succession to Key Positions of the Federal Departments and Agencies", August 2, 1991

FPC 65 Federal Preparedness Circular 62, "Delegation of Authorities for Emergency Situations", August 1, 1991

Federal Preparedness Circular 60, "Continuity of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government at the Headquarters Level During National Security Emergencies", November 20, 1990

NSD 69 National Security Directive 37, "Enduring Constitutional Government", April 18, 1990

Reagan administration

An unknown contingency plan (which some believe was Rex 84) was publicly mentioned during the Iran-Contra Hearings in 1987. [19][20] Transcripts from the hearing in the New York Times record the following dialogue between Congressman Jack Brooks, North's attorney Brendan Sullivan and Senator Daniel Inouye, the Democratic Chair of the Committee[21]:

------------------
[Congressman Jack] Brooks: Colonel North, in your work at the N.S.C. were you not assigned, at one time, to work on plans for the continuity of government in the event of a major disaster?

Brendan Sullivan [North's counsel, agitatedly]: Mr. Chairman?

[Senator Daniel] Inouye: I believe that question touches upon a highly sensitive and classified area so may I request that you not touch upon that?

Brooks: I was particularly concerned, Mr. Chairman, because I read in Miami papers, and several others, that there had been a plan developed, by that same agency, a contingency plan in the event of emergency, that would suspend the American constitution. And I was deeply concerned about it and wondered if that was an area in which he had worked. I believe that it was and I wanted to get his confirmation.

Inouye: May I most respectfully request that that matter not be touched upon at this stage. If we wish to get into this, I'm certain arrangements can be made for an executive session.
----------------


Executive Order 12656, "Assignment of Emergency Preparedness Responsibilities", November 18, 1988

Section 202 The head of each Federal department and agency shall ensure the continuity of essential functions in any national security emergency by providing for: succession to office and emergency delegation of authority in accordance with applicable law; safekeeping of essential resources, facilities, and records; and establishment of emergency operating capabilities.

Executive Order 12472, "Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Telecommunications Functions", April 3, 1984
NSD 69 NSDD 55, "Enduring National Leadership" September 14, 1982

Carter administration
Executive Order 12148, "Federal Emergency Management", July 20, 1979

Truman administration
National Security Act of 1947, July 26, 1947

Hardware and facilities

The Continuity of Operations Plan involves numerous bunkers, special airplanes, and communication systems. Much of the information about them is classified, however information on various systems has been released by the government or described to the public by reporters and writers. Since many of the details are classified, the public information may be incorrect. Also they are subject to change without public notice so this list may not reflect current plans.

Facilities

During the Cold War, the United States constructed bunkers to help provide survivability to military command and government officials. Some have been decommissioned since the Cold War. The ones that are still considered to be in operation are listed here.
Cheyenne Mountain Directorate - This bunker is the former home of NORAD. Becoming fully operational on April 20, 1966, it is located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Currently, the military has the goal of placing the operations center on "warm stand-by", meaning that the facility will be maintained and ready for use on short notice as necessary, but not used on a daily basis.[22] In the event of an emergency deemed serious enough, NORAD and USNORTHCOM would use the bunker for C4ISTAR of America's military.
Site R (Raven Rock) - Near Waynesboro, Pennsylvania, Site R is the emergency home for The Pentagon. Vice President Cheney is reported to have stayed here after the September 11 attacks.[23]
Mount Weather - The Mount Weather Emergency Operations Center is a government facility located near Bluemont, Virginia. It houses operations and training facilities above ground for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and contains an underground facility designed to house key components of the American government in the case of nuclear war. During the September 11 attacks, a line of government cars and limousines with police escort was seen heading from Washington, D.C. to Mount Weather. It has been suggested that Vice President Dick Cheney has been at Mount Weather from time to time, as it is the quintessential "secure undisclosed location". Since September 11, 2001, Mount Weather has seen a dramatic increase in staffing and support. It is believed[who?] that Mount Weather has largely assumed the functions of the facility at the Greenbrier, which was to house the U.S. Congress in an emergency, since that shelter was decommissioned.

Airplanes

Air Force One is the radio call sign of any Air Force plane the President of the United States travels on. However, the term normally refers to a Boeing VC-25A the President normally uses. While the VC-25A is equipped with numerous systems to ensure its survival, in an emergency it is recommended that he use the National Airborne Operations Center.

National Airborne Operations Center (codenamed Nightwatch) is a Boeing E-4 specially built to serve as a survivable mobile command post for the National Command Authority (NCA). Either the President or the Secretary of Defense may use it. It is also possible that the President would authorize the Vice President or others to use it, depending on the circumstances.

Looking Glass is USSTRATCOM's Airborne Command Post, designed to take over in case NORAD's Cheyenne Mountain Directorate is destroyed or incapable of communicating with strategic forces. Beginning February 3, 1961, an Air Force Looking Glass aircraft was in the air at all times 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. On July 24, 1990, Looking Glass ceased continuous airborne alert but remained on ground or airborne alert 24 hours a day. On Oct. 1, 1998, the U.S. Navy replaced the U.S. Air Force. In addition, a battle staff now flies with the TACAMO crew.[24]

Ships


The USS Wright (CC-2)

Two National Emergency Command Post Afloat.

The USS Northampton (CLC-1) was converted into Command ship CC-1 between 1961.

The USS Wright (CVL-49) was converted into Command ship (CC-2) between 1962 and 1963 and included the National Military Command System.

These vessels were decommissioned in 1970.

Communication

Communication is vital during a catastrophic event. Military communication links are designed for extreme situations such as nuclear war and thus considered more "survivable" than civilian networks. The Defense Information Systems Agency is in charge of supporting command, control, communications, and information systems for the military and would support the NCA. It is assumed that the various bunkers and airplanes have been equipped with special communication equipment to survive a catastrophe.

See also: National Program Office

Internet - The Internet began as the ARPANET, a program funded by the U.S. military. The Internet is designed with the capability to withstand losses of large portions of the underlying networks, but due to the huge numbers of people using it, it would likely be jammed and unable to handle communication if it suffered a large amount of damage. During a localized emergency, it is highly useful. However, the loss of electrical power to an area can make accessing the Internet difficult or impossible.
Communications satellites - Basically immune to any ground catastrophe, it is expected that military communication satellites would provide the government with the ability to communicate in any situation other than one that includes a direct attack upon the satellites.
Homeland security takes over communications May 9, 2007[clarification needed]

(16) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall: (h) As Executive Agent of the National Communications System, develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive continuity communications architecture.

See also
Main Core
National Response Framework
National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive
Presidential directive
Rex 84

General:
Continuity of Government
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Disaster recovery

Civilian:
Business continuity planning

References
^ FEMA Continuity of Operations (COOP)Awareness Course http://emilms.fema.gov/is546a/COOP0101000.htm.
^ Eric R. Daleo, State Constitutions and Legislative Continuity in a 9/11 World: Surviving an Enemy Attack, 58 DePaul L. Rev. 919 (2009). Accessed May 23, 2011.
^ NOTE: On the Audio Commentary with Historical Figures during Scene 17 (c 1:12) of the Thirteen Days DVD, the commentator states that President Eisenhower ran the U.S. government outside of Washington for four days in 1956.
^ Gellman, Barton; Schmidt, Susan (March 1, 2002). "Shadow Government Is at Work in Secret; After Attacks, Bush Ordered 100 Officials to Bunkers Away From Capital to Ensure Federal Survival". http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/109965333.html?did=109965333&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&date=Mar+1%2C+2002&author=Barton+Gellman+and+Susan+Schmidt&pub=The+Washington+Post&desc=Shadow+Government+Is+at+Work+in+Secret%3B+After+Attacks%2C+Bush+Ordered+100+Officials+to+Bunkers+Away+From+Capital+to+Ensure+Federal+Survival.
^ "The Shadow Government". CBS News. March 2, 2002. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/03/02/attack/main502695.shtml.
^ Fact Sheet: Forward Challenge 04, Homeland Security Press Room. Accessed June 6, 2006.
^ Department of Homeland Security Announces Pinnacle Exercise to Test Continuity of Operations (COOP) Plans, Homeland Security Press Room. Accessed June 6, 2006.
^ Back to the Bunker, The Washington Post. Accessed June 6, 2006.
^ Anti-War, 2010 Sept. 11, "Obama Extends Bush’s 9/11 State of Emergency: America to Enter Tenth Year of 'Emergency' Next Week," http://news.antiwar.com/2010/09/10/obama-announces-state-of-emergency-extension/
^ White House, 2010 Sept. 10, "Letter from the President on the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/10/letter-president-continuation-national-emergency-with-respect-certain-te
^ Title 50 United States Code, Chapter 34
^ Anti-War, 2010 Sept. 11, "Obama Extends Bush’s 9/11 State of Emergency: America to Enter Tenth Year of 'Emergency' Next Week," http://news.antiwar.com/2010/09/10/obama-announces-state-of-emergency-extension/
^ "[1]", Fact Sheet – Exercise VIGILANT SHIELD 2008
^ Kosseff, Jeff (July 20, 2007). "DeFazio asks, but he's denied access". The Oregonian. Archived from the original on 2007-08-10. http://web.archive.org/web/20070810100224/http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/118489654058910.xml&coll=7. Retrieved 2011-01-15.
^ AMERICA NEEDS A PLAN TO PROVIDE FOR CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT, Congressional Record: August 2, 2007, Page H9548.
^ "[2]", Curry County Reporter. Accessed September 7. 2007.
^ The Oregonian, 2007 July 27, "DeFazio Demands Access to Classified Information," http://blog.oregonlive.com/politics/2007/07/defazio_demands_access_to_clas.html
^ National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive
^[unreliable source?]Oliver North Questioned - Rex 84 Exposed During Iran Contra
^ Chip Berlet: The Right-Wing Roots of Sheehan's "Secret Team" Theory. In: Right Woos Left. 1990/1999
^ [Transcript from the House Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran, New York Times, July 14, 1987]
^ North American Aerospace Defense Command
^ Raven Rock Underground Command Center (Site R)
^ TACAMO - Take Charge And Move Out

External links
"Enduring Constitutional Government and Continuity of Government Operations" - Description of the secret Presidential Decision Directive 67, October 21, 1998
"Federal Executive Branch Continuity of Operations (COOP)" - Federal Preparedness Circular 65, July 26, 1999
FEDERAL PREPAREDNESS CIRCULAR 65, June 15, 2004 (from FEMA site)
Continuity of Government Commission
National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive Subject: National Continuity Policy May 9, 2007 - Revocation. Presidential Decision Directive 67 of October 21, 1998 ("Enduring Constitutional Government and Continuity of Government Operations"), including all Annexes thereto, is hereby revoked.
"AFI 10-208" USAF Continuity of Operations (COOP) Program
"The Atomic Midwife: The Eisenhower Administration’s Continuity-of-Government Plans and the Legacy of ‘Constitutional Dictatorship’"
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!