Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines

Author Topic: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines  (Read 29571 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline David Rothscum

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,683
I just found something terribly shocking. I was doing research on population reduction and found an actual patent on a "birth control vaccine" (that's what they call it, it just kills human embryo's) for the 3rd world that works by causing an abortion after a fertilized egg has embedded in the wall of the uterus. Here's the link to the patent:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5733553.html
Read the description:
Quote
Population is growing at a rapid pace in many economically developing countries and there is a continuing need of an alternate method for regulation of fertility.We proposed several years back a birth control vaccine which induces the formation of antibodies against the human pregnancy hormone, the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). These inventions are described in patents issued in India, U.S.A. and several other countries. (Ref. EP 204566, JP 62286928, CA 1239346, U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,312, CN 8603854). We describe now another invention which generates antibody response of a long duration against hCG after a single or a limited number of injections.

Quote
The cost of some of these is at present very high which will be restrictive to their large scale use in family planning programs of economically developing countries. Moreover these vaccines demand three injections for primary immunization followed by a fourth as booster. A major advantage of the present embodiment is the possibility of getting satisfactory and sustained antibody response with one primary injection and at most one booster. Another interesting feature is the low cost at which this vaccine can be prepared and made available for large scale use.
Pretty odd isn't it? Why would they develop a birth control method that needs 4 injections? Especially considering the fact that it works by causing the body to attack hCG. hCG only starts it's work when the fertilized egg has nestled, and levels can only be detected at about 11 days after conception:
http://www.americanpregnancy.org/duringpregnancy/hcglevels.html
That means the unborn child simply dies after a few weeks due to lack of hCG. That's not how western birth control works, which prevents ovulation from happening:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depo_provera
(Note how the first 5 letters spell out depop btw)
So how is this stuff being used:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/mar/04031101.html
UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents Scientist Finds
Scientist says things discovered in vaccines are "harmful, toxic"

KADUNA, Nigeria, March 11, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria's youth against polio may have been a front for sterilizing the nation. Dr. Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, took samples of the vaccine to labs in India for analysis.

Using WHO-recommended technologies like Gas Chromatography (GC) and Radio-Immuno assay, Dr. Kaita, upon analysis, found evidence of serious contamination. "Some of the things we discovered in the vaccines are harmful, toxic; some have direct effects on the human reproductive system," he said in an interview with Kaduna's Weekly Trust. "I and some other professional colleagues who are Indians who were in the Lab could not believe the discovery," he said.

A Nigerian government doctor tried to persuade Dr. Kaita that the contaminants would have no bearing on human reproduction. "…I was surprised when one of the federal government doctors was telling me something contrary to what I have learned, studied, taught and is the common knowledge of all pharmaceutical scientists -- that estrogen cannot induce an anti-fertility response in humans," he said. "I found that argument very disturbing and ridiculous."

When asked by the Trust why Dr. Kaita felt the drug manufacturers would have contaminated the Oral Polio Vaccine, he gave three reasons: "These manufacturers or promoters of these harmful things have a secret agenda which only further research can reveal. Secondly they have always taken us in the third world for granted, thinking we don't have the capacity, knowledge and equipment to conduct tests that would reveal such contaminants. And very unfortunately they also have people to defend their atrocities within our midst, and worst still some of these are supposed to be our own professionals who we rely on to protect our interests."

Dr. Kaita is demanding that "those who imported this fake drug in the name of Polio Vaccines…be prosecuted like any other criminal."

The campaign to rid Nigeria of polio is in its fourth year. Officials there claim that all contaminated vaccines have been exhausted and replaced by uncontaminated batches.

In a rhetorical conclusion to the interview, Dr. Kaita asked "What plans has the government put in place to help children who have been given these toxic and contaminated vaccines in case they start reacting to them?"

This is not the first time UNICEF has been embroiled in a controversy over sterilizing agents in vaccines. LifeSiteNews.com reported that in 1995, the Catholic Women's League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG, which when given in a vaccine permanently causes women to be unable to sustain a pregnancy. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.

See the related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2002/oct/021030a.html
As you can see in the article, nigeria isn't the only country where this has happened. More examples are mentioned in this article:
http://www.thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm
Note that these are all countries mentioned in Henry Kissinger's NSSM 200 as countries where it's most important for the psychopaths to reduce the population growth:
Quote
In order to assist the development of major countries and to maximize progress toward population stability, primary emphasis would be placed on the largest and fastest growing developing countries where the imbalance between growing numbers and development potential most seriously risks instability, unrest, and international tensions. These countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, The Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia, and Colombia.
Perhaps this helps explain why billionaires like Bill Gates and Rockefeller and their charities are so much into vaccinating people:
http://www.who.int/inf-pr-1999/en/pr99-75.html
(notice that it's to get rid of polio, the hormone which causes the women to become infertile was found in polio vaccines in Africa)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Alliance_for_Vaccines_and_Immunization
Who's involved in GAVI:
    * Governments and vaccine industry of industrialized countries
    * Governments and vaccine industry of developing countries
    * World Health Organization, WHO
    * United Nations Children's Fund, UNICEF
    * The World Bank Group
    * Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
    * Research institutes
    * Non-governmental organizations
    * Foundations
    * Technical health institutes
The usual suspects...
Ofcourse Rockefeller wants to join the fun as well:
http://www.oldthinkernews.com/Articles/oldthinker%20news/endgame_the_rabbit_hole.htm
Well that's all, it's a long read, but it's very important, and I hope it's understandable.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,093
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2008, 02:15:00 PM »

http://www.gardasil.com/
GARDASIL is the only vaccine that may help guard against diseases that are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) Types 6, 11, 16, and 18:
•   Cervical cancer
•   Cervical abnormalities that can sometimes lead to cervical cancer
•   Genital warts
HPV Types 16 and 18 cause 70% of cervical cancer cases, and HPV Types 6 and 11 cause 90% of genital warts cases.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT GARDASIL
GARDASIL may not fully protect everyone and does not prevent all types of cervical cancer, so it is important to continue regular cervical cancer screenings.
Anyone who is allergic to the ingredients of GARDASIL should not receive the vaccine.

GARDASIL is not for women who are pregnant.
GARDASIL will not treat cervical cancer and genital warts and will not protect against diseases caused by other HPV types.
GARDASIL is given as 3 injections over 6 months and can cause pain, swelling, itching, and redness at the injection site, fever, nausea, and dizziness.
Only a doctor or healthcare professional can decide if GARDASIL is right for you or your daughter. Ask about GARDASIL today.
______________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/who-should-receive-gardasil.html
GARDASIL AND YOU
GARDASIL is for girls and women ages 9 to 26. GARDASIL works when given before you have any contact with HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18.

If you've already been infected with HPV, you may still benefit from GARDASIL because it is unlikely that you have been infected with all 4 types of the virus covered by the vaccine. Your doctor or healthcare professional can help you understand more.

WHY SHOULD I GET MY DAUGHTER VACCINATED WITH GARDASIL NOW? CAN’T IT WAIT?
Like other vaccines your daughter has received, GARDASIL works to help prevent illness. GARDASIL works when given before there is any contact with HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18. That’s why it’s important that you talk to your daughter’s doctor or healthcare professional about getting GARDASIL now—not later. You’ll be helping to protect her future from cervical cancer and genital warts before she’s even old enough to worry about them.

GARDASIL IS PART OF YOUR DAUGHTER’S RECOMMENDED VACCINATION SCHEDULE.
Talk to your daughter's doctor or healthcare professional about getting her vaccinated with GARDASIL.
_____________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/cervical-cancer-vaccine.html
PROTECTION: 3 IS KEY
GARDASIL is given as 3 injections over 6 months.
•   First dose: At a date you and your doctor or healthcare professional choose
•   Second dose: 2 months after the first dose
•   Third dose: 6 months after the first dose

Getting all 3 doses will allow you or your daughter to get the full benefits of GARDASIL.
__________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/ask-your-doctor-about-hpv.html
QUESTIONS FOR YOUNG WOMEN AGES 18 TO 26
TO ASK ABOUT GARDASIL

1.   What are the benefits of vaccination with GARDASIL?
2.   Should I still get vaccinated if I’m already sexually active?
3.   What are the possible side effects of GARDASIL?


QUESTIONS FOR MOTHERS OF DAUGHTERS AGES 9 TO 17
TO ASK ABOUT GARDASIL

1.   Why should my daughter be vaccinated now?
2.   How is the vaccine given?
3.   What are the possible side effects of GARDASIL?
_________________________________

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR YOUNG WOMEN AGES 18 TO 26
Vaccination with GARDASIL does not take the place of Pap tests (cervical cancer screenings). You should keep following your doctor's or healthcare professional's advice on getting Pap tests.
Pap tests have been proven to help save lives. A Pap test looks for abnormal cells in the lining of the cervix before they have the chance to become precancerous or cervical cancer. The more severe the abnormality, the more likely it is that cervical cancer could develop in the future.
Having an abnormal Pap test isn't any reason to panic—it doesn't always mean that you are at risk for cancer or even have HPV. Your doctor or healthcare professional may repeat the Pap test or do other tests as needed.
Pap tests will still be an important part of taking control of your health—and taking care of yourself.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR MOTHERS OF GIRLS AGES 9 TO 17
Pap tests (cervical cancer screenings) have been proven to save lives. A Pap test looks for abnormal cells in the lining of the cervix before they have the chance to become precancerous or cervical cancer.
Your daughter's doctor or healthcare professional can tell you when her first Pap test should be.
In the meantime, you can start her good healthcare habits now. Take her for regular wellness visits. Understanding the importance of wellness visits now may help her maintain regular checkups as she gets older.
__________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/cervical-cancer.html
WHAT IS CERVICAL CANCER?
Cervical cancer is cancer of the cervix (the lower part of the uterus that connects to the vagina). Cervical cancer is caused by certain types of HPV. When a female becomes infected with certain types of HPV and the virus doesn’t go away on its own, abnormal cells can develop in the lining of the cervix. If not discovered early and treated, these abnormal cells can become cervical precancers and then cancer.

THERE'S GOOD NEWS
GARDASIL is the only vaccine that may help guard against diseases caused by HPV Types 16 and 18, which cause 70% of cervical cancer cases, and HPV Types 6 and 11, which cause 90% of genital warts cases.
____________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/genital-warts.html
WHAT ARE GENITAL WARTS?
Genital warts are usually flesh-colored growths. The types of HPV that cause genital warts are different from the types that can cause cervical cancer. About 2 out of 3 people who have sexual contact with a person who has genital warts will also get them. And even if the genital warts are treated, 25% of cases come back within 3 months if HPV is still present.

THERE'S GOOD NEWS
Being vaccinated with GARDASIL before coming into contact with a person who has HPV can help protect you against HPV Types 6 and 11—the types of HPV that cause most cases of genital warts.
____________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/risk-for-hpv.html
HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV)
HPV affects both women and men.
•   Anyone who has any kind of sexual activity involving genital contact with an infected person can get HPV—-intercourse isn't necessary.
•   Many people who may have HPV may not show any signs or symptoms, so they can pass the virus on without even knowing it.

HPV is easily transmitted. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 20 million people in the United States already had HPV in 2005.
According to the CDC, the only way you can totally protect yourself against HPV is to avoid any sexual activity that involves genital contact. HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 account for the majority of HPV-related clinical diseases.



†Number represents more than 30 genital HPV types, not just HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18.

THERE'S GOOD NEWS
Being vaccinated with GARDASIL before coming into contact with a person who has HPV may help protect you against HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18.
__________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/questions-about-gardasil.html
1.   Q: What is HPV?
    A: HPV is a common virus. In 2005 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that 20 million people in the United States had this virus. There are many different types of HPV. Some cause no harm; others can cause diseases of the genital area. For most people, the virus goes away on its own. When the virus does not go away, it can develop into cervical cancer, precancerous lesions, or genital warts, depending on the HPV type.
Top of page

2.   Q: How do people get HPV?
    A: HPV affects both women and men.
•   Anyone who has any kind of sexual activity involving genital contact with an infected person can get HPV—intercourse isn’t necessary.
•   Many people who have HPV may not show any signs or symptoms, so they can pass the virus on without even knowing it.

    HPV is easily transmitted. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 20 million people in the United States already had HPV in 2005.
    HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 account for the majority of HPV-related clinical diseases.

3.   Q: What is cervical cancer?
    A: Cervical cancer is cancer of the cervix (the lower part of the uterus that connects to the vagina). Cervical cancer is caused by certain types of HPV. When a female becomes infected with certain types of HPV and the virus doesn’t go away on its own, abnormal cells can develop in the lining of the cervix. If not discovered early and treated, these abnormal cells can become cervical precancers and then cancer.

4.   Q: What are genital warts?
    A: Genital warts are flesh-colored growths that appear in or around the genital area. The types of HPV that cause genital warts are different from the types of that can cause cervical cancer.
    About 2 out of 3 people who have sexual contact with a person who has genital warts will get them. Even after treatment, there is a chance that the genital warts could come back if HPV is still present. In fact, 25% of cases come back within 3 months.

5.   Q: Why should I get my daughter vaccinated with GARDASIL now?
Can't it wait?
    A: Like other vaccines, GARDASIL works to help prevent illness. GARDASIL works when given before there is any contact with HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18. That’s why it’s important that you talk to your daughter's doctor or healthcare professional about getting her vaccinated with GARDASIL now—not later. You’ll be helping to protect her future from cervical cancer and genital warts even before she is old enough to worry about them.

6.   Q: If I'm vaccinated with GARDASIL, will I still need to get Pap tests?
    A: Yes. Vaccination with GARDASIL does not take the place of Pap tests (cervical cancer screenings). You should keep following your doctor’s or healthcare professional’s advice on getting Pap tests. Pap tests have been proven to help save lives. A Pap test looks for abnormal cells in the lining of the cervix before they have the chance to become precancerous or cervical cancer. The more severe the abnormality, the more likely it is that cervical cancer could develop in the future. Having an abnormal Pap test isn’t any reason to panic—it doesn’t always mean that you are at risk for cancer or even have HPV. Your doctor or healthcare professional may repeat the Pap test or do other tests as needed. Pap tests will still be an important part of taking control of your health—and taking care of yourself.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT GARDASIL
HPV Types 16 and 18 cause 70% of cervical cancer cases, and HPV Types 6 and 11 cause 90% of genital warts cases.
GARDASIL may not fully protect everyone and does not prevent all types of cervical cancer, so it is important to continue regular cervical cancer screenings.
Anyone who is allergic to the ingredients of GARDASIL should not receive the vaccine. GARDASIL is not for women who are pregnant.
GARDASIL will not treat cervical cancer and genital warts and will not protect against diseases caused by other HPV types.
GARDASIL is given as 3 injections over 6 months and can cause pain, swelling, itching, and redness at the injection site, fever, nausea, and dizziness.
Only a doctor or healthcare professional can decide if GARDASIL is right for you or your daughter.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Theo42

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
    • Vaccine Risk
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2008, 03:00:48 PM »
Well, it appears we have uncovered the other intended side effect of the HPV vaccine.  Sterilization.  Going through the VAERS Report from September located here:  http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2007/GardasilVAERSUpdated.PDF   of 1824 reported adverse reactions: 35 were "Spontaneous Abortions" at various stages of pregnancy that were considered "Not Serious".  Or, in other words, it was doing what it was intended to do.

Reference Pages for "Spontaneous Abortions".

Pages:

72
103
262
271
287
506
573
627
645
658
666 (nice)
702
709
737
749
761
817
842
844
966
980
1087
1478
1486
1544
1547
1603
1623
1692
1695
1703
1726
1734
1758
1761


 >:(
My Blog on Vaccine Risk- A new resource tool in the fight!

http://vaccinerisk.blogspot.com/

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,093
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2008, 03:26:38 PM »
OMFG, how can anyone inject shit again?
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline David Rothscum

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2008, 03:35:53 PM »
OMFG, how can anyone inject shit again?
Well, I'm convinced these women won't:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB0FOjzvjiA
More information from this brave man fighting against UN genocide in Thailand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dutK67AwSg
Thanks for the sticky btw.

Offline KiwiClare

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,981
  • Either you're with us or with the terrorists
    • Northland New Zealand Chemtrails Watch
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2008, 05:09:07 PM »
Look at the photos that accompany the Gardasil ad Sane posted.  What do you notice?  More ads for depopulation?
To be persuasive, we must be believable,
To be believable, we must be credible,
To be credible, we must be truthful.
- Edward R. Murrow

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,093
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2008, 05:10:26 PM »
Look at the photos that accompany the Gardasil ad Sane posted.  What do you notice?  More ads for depopulation?

right in front of your eyes.

that is the way they do it
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline larsonstdoc

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,341
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2008, 05:43:30 PM »



   They know the dumbed down public is beyond stupid.  Don't let your daughters or granddaughters take the gardisil series of shots (3 shots).
I'M A DEPLORABLE KNUCKLEHEAD THAT SUPPORTS PRESIDENT TRUMP.  MAY GOD BLESS HIM AND KEEP HIM SAFE.

Offline KiwiClare

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,981
  • Either you're with us or with the terrorists
    • Northland New Zealand Chemtrails Watch
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2008, 06:03:42 PM »
Gardasil: The Mercky World of Anti-Cancer Vaccines
Monday, 14 May 2007, 1:40 pm
Opinion: Cathy van Miert
Gardasil - The Mercky World of Anti-Cancer Vaccines
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0705/S00287.htm
By Cathy van Miert

President Nixon declared the "war on cancer" in 1971 by passing the National Cancer Act. A bounty of US$100 million was provided for research in the hope that a cure could be found for what was then the second-leading cause of death in the United States. At this time it was believed that many viruses played a role in cancer causation, so the race was on to identify, and develop vaccines against, the offending pathogens.

What followed was more of a one-legged limp to a distant finish line with precious little of therapeutic benefit arising from this research despite immense strides in technology and billions of dollars spent.
In June 2006 however, Merck Pharmaceuticals finally hopped over the finish line with Gardasil - the "first anti-cancer vaccine".

So is Gardasil really the Holy Grail of cancer prevention - or is it just media hype?

Following US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, Gardasil received the biggest hard sell of any recently introduced new medicines. Merck staged a dual campaign of intense lobbying of congress to have the vaccine made mandatory for all 11- and 12-year old girls, in tandem with an equally intense media campaign.

While a "life-saving vaccine" would be logically expected to sell itself, the campaign suffered some serious setbacks. Far from being perceived as a miracle, some sections of the public are regarding the vaccine with scepticism and suspicion. A vociferous backlash has put many of these state mandates on hold, and those state governors who initially backed the mandates have justified fears for re-election.

It isn't all doom and gloom for Merck however; the vaccine is predicted to achieve blockbuster status of over $1 billion in sales by the end of 2007. The media campaign is reaping pretty good returns.

The Hard Sell

The "One Less" Gardasil TV commercial is a prime example of slick marketing and corporate spin. In an attempt to resonate with its intended recipients, Merck has effectively 'branded' Gardasil much like Coca Cola or MacDonalds.

Pretty girls with 'attitude' display the words "One Less" written on skateboards, running shoes and clothing, while performing cool but wholesome activities like skateboarding, basketball and playing drums. They look deadpan at the camera; repeatedly stating they would like to be the "one less" (death from cervical cancer) statistic. Then an attractive mom introduces a note of caution delivered in loving, dulcet tones that the vaccine has potential adverse effects (required by US advertising law).

The overall message is that Gardasil is "cool" and lifesaving, even when mum has a few concerns (a note of teen rebellion). Furthermore, it's the only vaccine available, so who could possibly say no?

Watching the commercial more carefully demonstrates just how clever Merck has been with this approach - "one less" negates the need to state actual numbers of lives they expect Gardasil to 'save'. And the words in the voice-over expose a subtle but important difference between the commercial's overall feel and the necessity of insuring themselves against future litigation or charges of fraudulent claims.

"Gardasil - the only vaccination that may protect you against 4 types of human papilloma that may cause 70% of cervical cancer".

The voice is inflected on the word 'only' while 'may' almost slips past unnoticed. Semantics surely? But the use of the word may rather than will provides this insurance nicely; Merck cannot categorically state that Gardasil prevents cervical cancer for the simple reason that it has not been proven to do so in properly conducted clinical trials. This omission has not deterred the US Centers for Disease Control from recommending that all women between ages 11 to 26 years should be vaccinated.

In New Zealand, Merck seem rather more brazen than their US counterparts in the claims being made for Gardasil. On their website - gardasil.co.nz - information is provided for both patients and health professionals. Both are informed that HPV causes all cervical cancer. It appears that our cervixes (or our litigation laws) are different to those of the rest of the world! The information provided for doctors makes even more bizarre claims; "Gardasil is 100% effective in protecting your patients from diseases caused by HPV 16, 18, 6 and 11" including cervical cancer!" Were Ministry of Health officials asleep when this one snuck under the radar?

What you should know about this vaccine

Rather than rely the emotive (but no less important) anti-vaccine arguments this writer would like to bring a little logical perspective to the debate by looking at the evidence for the vaccine's effectiveness.

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection is mild and self-limiting in the majority of cases; indeed many people have no symptoms at all. The virus is generally cleared from the system within a few weeks to months.

HPV is not a single virus entity - over 200 sub-types have been identified, 30 of which are known to infect the genital tract. HPV 6, 11, 42, 43 and 44 are classified as low-risk (for cancer), while 16, 18, 31, 33, 34, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, and 70 are considered to be the "high-risk" subtypes depending on the population studied. Viral particles of subtypes 6, 11, 16 and 18 are used in the Gardasil vaccine. Although HPV DNA has been found in ~ 80% of cervical squamous carcinoma, many researchers feel that HPV alone "is neither necessary nor sufficient" for the development of cervical carcinoma, and have found evidence that additional genetic predispositions must be present. A US study published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews in 2003 stated:

    "A genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma has long been recognized and is widely accepted. Genetic predisposition was found to be even a greater component in cervical cancer when the same method of analysis was used. Genetic heritability was found to account for 27% of the effect of underlying factors for tumor development. Heritability could affect many factors contributing to the development of cervical cancer, including susceptibility to HPV infection, ability to clear HPV infection, and time to development of disease."

And yet Merck state repeatedly on their promotional material that cervical cancer is not heritable.

Far from being the much-touted epidemic, the incidence of cervical cancer has been declining steadily for the last 50 years largely thanks to effective screening programmes. Mortality from cervical cancer has also decreased - between 1980 the rate dropped from 12 to 5 per 100,000 people per year; so while HPV infection is on the increase, the rate of cervical cancer is not.

Cervical cancer falls into two types; squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma - the former is associated with the human papilloma virus (HPV). Squamous carcinoma is more easily detected by Pap smear, and comprises about 70% of all cervical cancers. The remaining 30% adenomcarcinomas are not easily detected with current cervical screening because it develops further up the cervical canal in areas that are not accessed by the traditional Pap smear.

How much does "One Less" cost?

The current incidence (new cases per year) of cervical cancer in NZ is 14 per 100,000 women - and one in three will die from the disease.

The cost of the 3 vaccinations required is $450.00. Once the GP fees are included (around $50.00 per visit) the total cost is roughly $600.00.

GSK's rival cervical cancer vaccine was shown to have "efficacy [antibodies in the blood] for up to 4.5 years". If we assume Merck's vaccine to be slightly superior, and generously allow up to 5 years protection (and it is a big if) and then calculate the number of HPV 16 and 18 associated cancer incidence:

14 X 70% (HPV-associated cervical cancer) = 9.8 cases per 100,000

9.8 X 30% (non HPV 16, 18-associated cervical cancer = 2.94 per 100,000

9.8 - 2.94 = 6.9 per 100,000 women per year with an HPV16,18-associated cervical cancer

6.9 per 100,000 equates to a 1 in 14,492 chance per year of getting the type of cancer associated with the strains of HPV in the Gardasil vaccine. Put another way, 14,492 females would have to be vaccinated to prevent one case of cervical cancer:

14,492 X $600 = $1,739,040
5 years

To possibly prevent one case of cervical cancer

$1,739,040 X 3 = $5,217,120

To possibly prevent one death from cervical cancer

There will always be the argument that every life is priceless, but the price tag of over 5 million dollars to possibly prevent one death from cervical cancer makes the Herceptin (breast cancer drug) funding issue look like the contents of the tips jar at a kleptomaniacs' convention.

So what evidence is there that Gardasil prevents HPV, and by inference, cervical cancer? A Medline search with the limit "randomised clinical trial" and the key word "Gardasil" returns nothing.

Forgive my cynicism, but surely the peer-reviewed medical publishing world would fight over publication of studies proving an anti-cancer vaccine was "effective and safe" if they were written in green crayon on plastic bubble-wrap by a dyslexic 2-year old chimpanzee. This should be earth-shattering news after all. Don't the researchers want any glory? They are not usually such reticent beings.

Evidence-Based Medicine?

There have been a few published HPV vaccine trials however; a repeat search using the key words "HPV vaccine" instead of "Gardasil" yielded 4 results. Reading these studies was a Goldilocks-type experience. One was too small, one was irrelevant, and two used a different vaccine. So where was the evidence of testing in over 20,000 women in clinical trials?

The only evidence of these trials is the Merck data itself (remember these are the chaps who "forgot" to submit the data on the deadly cardiovascular effects of Vioxx to the FDA or New England Journal of Medicine).

The trial results have not been published in the peer-reviewed literature, but were submitted for the FDA approval requirement. This is very common, and it may surprise many to learn that the FDA does not require publication of the data either prior to, or following approval. This means that new drugs, vaccines and devices are not independently reviewed before coming to the market. How 'independent' these FDA officials are is a valid point; new rules announced in March 2007 will bar medical professionals from serving on their advisory committees if they receive less than US$50,000 from the company whose product is being evaluated (or a competitor)! $49,999.99 wouldn't influence anyone - would it? How much were they receiving under the old rules?

A summary of their data is available in an FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Assessment Committee (VRBPAC) background document. It combines the results of some (but not all) of the Merck trials of Gardasil. The document is a veritable morass of anomalies and contradictions.

1) In its promotional material Merck claims that women aged 16-23 years are at highest risk of HPV infection; presumably due to the high level of sexual activity in this demographic.

The largest phase III study was the FUTURE (Females United To Unilaterally Reduce Endo/ectocervical disease) II study. Described as "a randomised, worldwide, placebo controlled, double blind study" which enrolled 12,167 women aged 16-23 years of age. Women were excluded if they were deemed high-risk (more than 4 lifetime sexual partners or other conditions deemed by the investigator to possibly interfere with the trial).

So Merck apparently excluded exactly the "high-risk" demographic the vaccine was intended for!

What the conditions were that investigators deemed to be possible interfering factors were not described. This is scientifically unusual; exclusion criteria are generally listed.
Of over 12,000 women screened, only 540 (4.5%) were deemed "high risk".

Only 4.5% of women screened by Merck were "high-risk" - how did they tap into such a virginal or abstentious population?

2) The results of study 015 are decidedly self-contradictory. External growth lesions (EGL or warts) were measured and the offending HPV subtype identified:

Table 1: EGL caused by HPV 6/11/16/18

Endpoint Gardasil
(n = 6082) Placebo
(n = 6075)
HPV 6/11/16/18 EGL (cases) 1 70

Table 2: EGL caused by all HPV infection (including HPV 6/11/16/18)

Endpoint Gardasil
(n = 6082) Placebo
(n = 6075)
HPV any type EGL (cases) 96 177


Merck has claimed repeatedly that "strains 6 and 11 cause 90% of genital warts". If this were the case then why so many extra cases of "all" HPV once the HPV 6/11/16/18 are subtracted. Using the 90% figure, one would expect 7 extra HPV infections caused by other strains rather than the 107 reported in the placebo group, and there should have been only 7 rather than 96 in the Gardasil group. According to Merck's own results, strains 6 and 11 contribute less than 40% to all genital warts.

3) In study 013 when they compared "HPV 6/11/16/18 and CIN 1" (pre-cancerous cells) and all "HPV and CIN 1 or worse" and the same phenomenon occurred - only 32% of the EGLs were caused by HPV 6/11/16/18. In the placebo group it was reported that there were 39 cases of CIN related to the HPV strains in the vaccine and 107 related to strains not covered by the vaccine, putting the oft-claimed 70% figure under the spotlight again; it now looks more like 27%.

4) The prevalence of women who were positive to HPV infection (using PCR) at the start of the study was 568/9075 in the Gardasil group and 580/9075 in the placebo group.
This puts HPV prevalence of Merck's participants at just over 6%, and yet most prevalence studies put (PCR) HPV prevalence at 30%.

5) The placebo recipients received one of two preparations. This type of protocol is unheard of in 'placebo controlled' studies.

Of all "placebo" recipients, 3470 received a preparation containing aluminium and 594 received saline - only 17% received a true placebo.

Aluminium is not an inert substance when it is injected into the human body. It is added as an adjuvant to enhance the immune response to a viral vaccine that on its own produces only a weak (and ineffective) response.

Why use this atypical protocol? Because it skews the safety data considerably; it effectively ensures that the adverse effects between placebo and Gardasil recipients did not differ significantly so they could claim it was 'safe and well tolerated'. In only one table the saline recipients are listed separately but in all the others they were not. This is nothing but scientific sophistry.

6) In one of the studies, in the group that had asymptomatic HPV infection confirmed at the start of the study, Gardasil vaccine resulted in a 33% greater number of external genital lesions. How did Merck explain this result?

"Differences in baseline characteristics". The package insert has conveniently left this information out.

7) When Merck combined the efficacy analyses for studies 007, 013 and 015 they used a "composite endpoint" to compare the efficacy of the vaccine with placebo. Researchers often use this somewhat sneaky contrivance when they know their product will not achieve any significant benefit in any single endpoint such as the 'actual' numbers of cervical cancers in each group. CIN 2/3 does not always progress to carcinoma. Lumping them in together does not allow any meaningful comparison.

8) Merck lobbied congress hard to have the vaccine made mandatory for all girls aged 11-12 years. Their trials had such a short duration of follow-up that nobody knows how long the antibodies will hang around (GSK's vaccine was 4.5 years).

The antibodies will be long gone from the bloodstream when an 11-year old vaccinee becomes sexually active 7-8 years later. Repeated vaccines would be necessary to confer ongoing protection (if it works) throughout her lifetime of sexual activity of over 40 years.

The Merck study results are inconsistent and self-contradictory at the very least; what they might be at worst could be the basis of litigation. They should be seriously called into question and thoroughly examined by independent (if there are any) epidemiological peer-reviewers.

To be fair to Merck, it is very difficult to prove an intervention works (or not) in healthy individuals. Usually 200 or so people have actually contract a disease in each group for the data to have any statistical power. If cervical cancer only has an incidence of 14 in 100,000 women/year they would need to follow over 2 million women for 1 year, or 1 million women for two years- and so on. Far more convenient and profitable for Merck that we offer up our daughters as the guinea pigs whilst paying through the cervix for the privilege - it's called "Post-Marketing Surveillance (and Merck have a woeful track record on that too).

Summary

    * Gardasil is a vaccine that may protect against a virus that may cause some but certainly not the majority of cases of cervical cancer

    * Gardasil is a vaccine that may only confer protection for less than 5 years

    * Gardasil is a vaccine that will require the spending of over five million dollars to possibly prevent one death

    * Merck are laughing all the way to the bank

ENDS
To be persuasive, we must be believable,
To be believable, we must be credible,
To be credible, we must be truthful.
- Edward R. Murrow

Offline Weston White

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2008, 06:12:08 PM »
Utterly demented as this is disturbing. Great job on the research.

Offline David Rothscum

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2008, 05:49:57 PM »
More inventions invented to be used for population control:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4233968.html
Quote
Nevertheless, the general convenience and safety of intrauterine devices continues to give hope that the IUD may one day provide an ideal method for worldwide population control, since it has been found, statistically, that intrauterine devices can provide effective contraception in a 98-99% range of effectivity
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/3858586.html
Quote
At the present time, there is a great need for a quick, easy and effective mechanism for female sterilization. This need is abundantly clear in the United States and is perhaps even more pressing in other countries, particularly, poverty striken countries. Birth control and population reduction are easily and non-surgically accomplished by a wide variety of means dependent on continual cooperation by the people involved. Sterilization, however, has generally been a serious surgical operation requiring hospitalization and use of a surgical operating room. Obviously, therefore, the need is clear for a sterilization procedure which can be carried out for example, in the doctor's office.

Offline David Rothscum

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2008, 06:14:54 PM »
They know...

http://www.medanthro.net/maq/v14/14no2.html
Quote
Sterilizing Vaccines or the Politics of the Womb: Retrospective Study of a Rumor in Cameroon
Pamela Feldman-Savelsberg, Flavien T. Ndonko, and Bergis Schmidt-Ehry

    In 1990 a rumor that public health workers were administering a vaccine to sterilize girls and women spread throughout Cameroon. Schoolgirls leapt from windows to escape the vaccination teams, and the vaccination campaign (part of the Year of Universal Child Immunization) was aborted. This article traces the origin and development of this rumor. Theories of rumor and ambiguous cultural response to new technologies shed some light on its genesis and spread, but explain neither its timing nor its content. For this task we need to examine the historical context of Cameroonian experience with colonial vaccination campaigns and the contemporary contexts of the turmoil of democratization movements and economic crisis, concurrent changes in contraceptive policy, and regional mistrust of the state and its "hegemonic project." Drawing on Bayart’s politique du ventre and White’s thoughts on gossip, we explore this rumor as diagnostic of local response to global and national projects. This response, expressed in this case through the idiom of threats to local reproductive capacity, reveals a feminine side to local-global relations, a politics of the womb. [rumor, immunization, public health, Cameroon, fertility]
http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2004/march/polio.htm
Quote
NIGERIA: Muslim suspicion of polio vaccine lingers on


The success of the global effort to eradicate polio may rest on the outcome of a week-long tour of India, South Africa and Indonesia by a Nigerian delegation which has been conducting tests on polio vaccines used for immunisation in Nigeria.

The team comprised health officials nominated by the government and Jama'atu Nasril Islam, an umbrella group of Muslim organisations in Nigeria, and key Muslim leaders.

The federal government is hoping this high-powered delegation will these polio vaccines the all clear. That would help to dispel widespread suspicion in the mainly Muslim north of Nigeria that the vaccines contain anti-fertility agents and the virus that causes AIDS.
Without internet, without tv and without an education these people know what westerners are still denying for themselves.They're more afraid of standing out in the crowd or being branded a luddite or conspiracy theorist so they go along and destroy their health and any future they could have had.

Anyone with an internet connection can look up how Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist who founded planned parenthood, and how Bill Gates his father worked for this same organisation and is now using his son's money to vaccinate 3rd world people together with the Rockefeller Foundation that's at the same time funding facilities used for China's one child policy.

The people living in the 3rd world know they have to run away when the UN comes to ruin their lives with their vaccines, funded by fake liberals who think they're helping the poor people when giving money to Unicef. Unfortunately for the elite these people aren't as slavish as the Westerners whose families have been destroyed by so called feminist organizations that used to call themselves neo-malthusian before WWII (I'm not making this up, unfortunately the source text is Dutch so I can't prove this to you).

They've lived under colonialism for hundreds of years and they know when a bunch of rich politicians say they want to be their friends and help them they're lying and are trying to gain control over them.  I hope we'll learn the same lesson before it's too late.

Offline David Rothscum

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2008, 08:04:01 AM »
Update: This vaccine was DEVELOPED by the Rockefellers!!!!!
http://www.popline.org/docs/0782/044328.html
Quote
Certain questions arise about the hormone specificity and consequently the safety of the antifertility vaccines which either are in phase I clinical trials or are planned to be by the Population Council and the Indian Institute of Immunology. These 2 groups maintain that their carrier-coupled antigens are safe on the basis that a-oLH, B-hCG, B-oLH, and a-oLH/B-hCG are either species specific, or, if antibodies against hLH are elicited they would cause no side effects.
The Population Council was openly started by John D. Rockefeller the 3rd in 1952:
http://www.popcouncil.org/about/timeline.html
The Rockefellers don't care that this stuff causes birth defects: http://www.writersontheloose.com/writers/DMIsham/index.cfm?story=34153
All they want to do is reduce the worlds population. I hope this man is currently burning in hell.

Offline la Resistance

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
  • Agent (of Change)
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #13 on: March 09, 2008, 08:48:18 AM »
...for all us men with the women we love...

TONIGHT'S GOOD NIGHT'S SLEEP
~SPONSORED BY~
DAVID ROTHSCUM
There's more to hope for than you might think.

Offline Apolitical Blues

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
  • Respect yourself
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #14 on: March 13, 2008, 09:54:55 AM »
The uproar over forced vaccinations for HPV must have had a more profound impact on our population that we understood.  People are staying away in droves just to avoid this poison and the NWO population control crowd has unleashed another round of 'scientific studies' from our beloved CDC in Atlanta.

It seems that our youth are having more sex than any other population on the planet, and getting infected while doing it.  I wasn't aware that one in four girls aged 14-19 had STD's or, that half of the black young women in the U.S. are infected.  I also refuse to believe any of this and, IMHO, neither should you!

http://www.cdc.gov/stdconference/2008/media/release-11march2008.htm

I was not pleased to see that Washington University, Dept. of Biology led the team to patent the population control vaccine.  I go to the Med. school for their Center for Advanced Medicine.  Rife looks better all the time.
Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if Labor had not first existed. Labor is superior to capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.  Abraham Lincoln

Offline David Rothscum

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2008, 04:11:20 PM »
It shouldn't come as a surprise that the Rockefeller family is involved with covert sterilization. The Rockefeller's have been involved with eugenics ever since the 1920's.
http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html
I'd definitely recommend you to read this whole article, but here are some of the most important excerpts concerning the Rockefellers:

Quote
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.

Quote
More than just providing the scientific roadmap, America funded Germany's eugenic institutions. By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 -- almost $4 million in 21st-Century money -- to hundreds of German researchers. In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 to the German Psychiatric Institute of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, later to become the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry. Among the leading psychiatrists at the German Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Rüdin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression.

Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute's eugenic complex of institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. Since 1915, it had operated out of a single room. Everything changed when Rockefeller money arrived in 1929. A grant of $317,000 allowed the Institute to construct a major building and take center stage in German race biology. The Institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years. Leading the Institute, once again, was Hitler's medical henchman Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin's organization became a prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and others.

Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans taken from old age homes, mental institutions and other custodial facilities were systematically gassed. Between 50,000 and 100,000 were eventually killed.

Leon Whitney, executive secretary of the American Eugenics Society declared of Nazism, "While we were pussy-footing around…the Germans were calling a spade a spade."

A special recipient of Rockefeller funding was the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Berlin. For decades, American eugenicists had craved twins to advance their research into heredity. The Institute was now prepared to undertake such research on an unprecedented level. On May 13, 1932, the Rockefeller Foundation in New York dispatched a radiogram to its Paris office: JUNE MEETING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS OVER THREE YEAR PERIOD TO KWG INSTITUTE ANTHROPOLOGY FOR RESEARCH ON TWINS AND EFFECTS ON LATER GENERATIONS OF SUBSTANCES TOXIC FOR GERM PLASM.

At the time of Rockefeller's endowment, Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer, a hero in American eugenics circles, functioned as a head of the Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics. Rockefeller funding of that Institute continued both directly and through other research conduits during Verschuer's early tenure. In 1935, Verschuer left the Institute to form a rival eugenics facility in Frankfurt that was much heralded in the American eugenic press. Research on twins in the Third Reich exploded, backed up by government decrees. Verschuer wrote in Der Erbarzt, a eugenic doctor's journal he edited, that Germany's war would yield a "total solution to the Jewish problem."

Verschuer had a long-time assistant. His name was Josef Mengele. On May 30, 1943, Mengele arrived at Auschwitz. Verschuer notified the German Research Society, "My assistant, Dr. Josef Mengele (M.D., Ph.D.) joined me in this branch of research. He is presently employed as Hauptsturmführer [captain] and camp physician in the Auschwitz concentration camp. Anthropological testing of the most diverse racial groups in this concentration camp is being carried out with permission of the SS Reichsführer [Himmler]."

Josef MengeleMengele began searching the boxcar arrivals for twins. When he found them, he performed beastly experiments, scrupulously wrote up the reports and sent the paperwork back to Verschuer's institute for evaluation. Often, cadavers, eyes and other body parts were also dispatched to Berlin's eugenic institutes.

Rockefeller executives never knew of Mengele. With few exceptions, the foundation had ceased all eugenic studies in Nazi-occupied Europe before the war erupted in 1939. But by that time the die had been cast. The talented men Rockefeller and Carnegie financed, the institutions they helped found, and the science it helped create took on a scientific momentum of their own.

This wasn't the only way the Rockefellers were involved with eugenics before World War II. It's also mainstream history that the Rockefellers have been involved with Planned Parenthood ever since eugenicist Margaret Sanger started it: http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/tay/tay_04robthecrad.html

Offline White Rose Sophie

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,132
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #16 on: March 30, 2008, 05:53:40 PM »
Another resource I highly recommend is Horowitz's book, Emerging Viruses.  His research is well documented, and has some very interesting tidbits about The "Merckants Of Death". 

Offline Plautus

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • The doctor is: IN
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2011, 01:23:23 AM »
This is a great thread but I don't think it's a secret any more.  :-\
"You have to be lucky all the time, we only have to get lucky once." - Anonymous

Offline White Rose Sophie

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,132
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #18 on: May 30, 2011, 02:14:42 AM »
This is a great thread but I don't think it's a secret any more.  :-\

It's still a secret amongst most of the people I know.  Since it's just too horrible to contemplate, they just prefer to live in ignorance.   ??? ???

kurtaxis

  • Guest
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #19 on: May 30, 2011, 02:54:42 AM »
It's still a secret amongst most of the people I know.  Since it's just too horrible to contemplate, they just prefer to live in ignorance.   ??? ???

Still a secret but becoming more and more apparent among those with a wedge of cynicism, I am glad that this thread was revisited since it expanded my sources of information on the subject.

I am looking for more downloadable pdf documents to store and archive.

kurtaxis

  • Guest
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #20 on: May 30, 2011, 02:57:33 AM »
The uproar over forced vaccinations for HPV must have had a more profound impact on our population that we understood.  People are staying away in droves just to avoid this poison and the NWO population control crowd has unleashed another round of 'scientific studies' from our beloved CDC in Atlanta.

It seems that our youth are having more sex than any other population on the planet, and getting infected while doing it.  I wasn't aware that one in four girls aged 14-19 had STD's or, that half of the black young women in the U.S. are infected.  I also refuse to believe any of this and, IMHO, neither should you!

http://www.cdc.gov/stdconference/2008/media/release-11march2008.htm

I was not pleased to see that Washington University, Dept. of Biology led the team to patent the population control vaccine.  I go to the Med. school for their Center for Advanced Medicine.  Rife looks better all the time.

If there is research money available then there will be studies, I am pretty sure when the billionaires club met in manhattan to discuss population control they included a proviso to fund such programs.

Offline White Rose Sophie

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,132
Re: Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
« Reply #21 on: May 30, 2011, 01:14:27 PM »
I think it highly likely that MOST of what we ingest (if we do not grow it, distill it, or know from whence it comes) have anti-fertility agents in it.  Who knows - possibly also in the chemtrails that we breathe in.

The only small satisfaction I get is knowing that those in power WILL have a reckoning one day.......and it won't be pretty.  Maybe that's why they keep trying to find technologies to 'live forever'....so that they DON'T die and have to face the music they have orchestrated on the rest of humanity.

 :-\