***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams

Author Topic: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams  (Read 30999 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Here is the most amazing shit exposed, Ivan Marovic and OTPOR confirmed CIA operative and operations are behind the OCCUPY WALL STREET scam

Check out the CIA in action...

Thanks to Conspiracy Center for putting the pieces together...

After Operation Fast and Furious exposed that Attorney General Eric Holder may be guilty of mass murder and Operation Delego exposed that Attorney General Eric Holder may be guilty of massive obstructions of justice to thousands of pedophilia crimes...now Panetta/Petreus may be guilty of executing the largest anti-American black operations on American soil ever...

Here is the OTPOR/CIA connection to Occupy Wall Street:


Otpor are professional revolutionaries. Alex needs to organize the co-opting of this movement before they do here what they did to Egypt.


Quote







Quote



Quote


Quote


Quote


Quote

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Optimus

  • Globalist Destroyer
  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,802
    • GlobalGulag.com
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2011, 01:24:34 AM »



More proof! Just follow the OTPOR clenched fist symbol!


CIA Coup Army Uncovered in Asia

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2011/07/03/cia-coup-army-uncovered-in-asia/
Posted on Pakalert on July 3, 2011

Hidden in plain sight, army of dupes prepare for “Asian Summer.”

by Tony Cartalucci

Bangkok, Thailand July 2, 2011 - A tiny handful of Marxists, dupes, and shills converged in Bangkok today in what would seem like nothing more than a footnote in the day’s news. In reality, it was actually the surfacing fin of a shark prowling the political waters of Southeast Asia. While Bangkok certainly has enough foreign-funded troubles of its own, the protest was actually held at the Malaysian Embassy regarding “political prisoners” the Malaysian government is allegedly holding. What was particularly telling was the tiny, very familiar, clenched fist logo adorning the protesters’ clothing and banners.

The US National Endowment for Democracy (NED)-funded Prachatai propaganda outfit dutifully reported in their article, “Solidarity protest for clean and fair elections and immediate release of Bersih activists,” that on July 1, “students, activists and press gathered outside the Malaysian Embassy, Bangkok, in response to the Malaysian Government’s arrest of more than a hundred members of the coalition network Bersih 2.0 consisting of various Malaysian human rights organizations campaigning for reforms in the electoral system.” Joining the protest, according to the Bangkok Post, was the People’s Empowerment Foundation, another National Endowment for Democracy-funded front group.

Malaysia Too

Photos: Adorning the back of one Thai protester’s brown t-shirt and the red banner of Malaysia’s PSM, is the now ubiquitous Otpor clenched fist. The US-funded Serbian organization Otpor, would later become CANVAS and train US-backed revolutionaries all over the world. Now apparently movements are combining their efforts regardless of nationality in an attempt to replace national governments with a homogenous, centrally funded and controlled civil society network. For more on CANVAS see “Fake Revolutions.”

Now see these photos taken from this post

Serbia’s US National Endowment for
Democracy funded “Otpor”


Serbia’s “Otpor,” a model for future
US-backed color revolutions.

...


Egypt’s “April 6 Youth Movement,” note the EXACT same
fist logo, most likely brought back from Serbia by April 6
members studying the CANVAS “curriculum.”


Egypt’s “April 6 Youth Movement” banner with painted in
Egyptian flag to give the “Otpor-fist” some local flavor.

...


Bahrain’s “Youth for Freedom” may have attended
the CIA-coup college as well. BBC’s canonizing of
Bahrain’s protesters as heroes surely indicates
establishment approval.

Read More: http://www.pakalertpress.com/2011/07/03/cia-coup-army-uncovered-in-asia/
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people,
it's an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” – Patrick Henry

>>> Global Gulag Media & Forum <<<

Offline Optimus

  • Globalist Destroyer
  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,802
    • GlobalGulag.com
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2011, 01:30:31 AM »
Saturday, February 19, 2011
CIA Coup-College
UPDATE: CANVAS has moved and renamed their Cooperation and Supporters web-page. It can now be found under "External Links."

Recycled revolutionary "props."

by Tony Cartalucci

First noted by geopolitical analyst and historian Dr. Webster Tarpley, some suspicious similarities could be seen between the Egyptian unrest and another, known US-backed uprising in Serbia. Serbia's Otpor, or the "resistance," was funded to the tune of millions by the US National Endowment for Democracy. Its signature clenched fist logo adorned flags, signboards, and t-shirts carried by the US State Department-laid astro-turf until the ousting of Slobodan Milošević in 2000.

The exact same logo would turn up 11 years later across the Mediterranean Sea in the streets of Cairo, illustrating further the preposterous, foreign-backed nature of the Egyptian uprisings. Could it just be just a coincidence and Dr. Tarpley's take mere speculative conjecture? Not even close.

After its success, Serbia's Otpor would continue receiving funds from the West and become a "CIA-coup college" of sorts, under the name CANVAS, or "Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies." It appears that after the Egyptian April 6 Youth Movement finished attending the US State Department funded confab in New York City in 2008, it would make a trip to visit CANVAS in 2009. From there, it took CANVAS's "curriculum" and apparently their logo, and began assembling a US-funded mob in Egypt.

Amongst CANVAS's current "partners" are the Albert Einstein Institution, Freedom House, and the International Republican Institute (IRI). The IRI includes amongst its board of directors John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Brent Scowcroft. When John McCain says "We should have seen this coming," in regards to the unrest in Egypt, he obviously isn't talking about himself since he helped make it happen.

See with your own eyes, the absolutely shameless hoax foisted upon you, the general public, by your corporate owned mainstream media, the US State Department, and all the disingenuous leaders who have feigned ignorance and surprise over the premeditated and meticulously planned unrest still unfolding throughout the Middle East today, and NEVER believe a word they say again.

More: http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/02/cia-coup-college.html
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people,
it's an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” – Patrick Henry

>>> Global Gulag Media & Forum <<<

Offline Optimus

  • Globalist Destroyer
  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,802
    • GlobalGulag.com
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2011, 01:37:07 AM »
Monday, June 13, 2011
Fake Revolutions
The debate is over; the revolutions are fake, the people behind them illegitimate.

by Tony Cartalucci


CANVAS leader Srdja Popovic stands here before Columbia, a public sponsor of the US State Department's Movements.org. While he denies he is being funded by the US government, just as his disingenuous movement did in 2000 before being found to have lied, his organization works in tandem with the US State Department's agenda and the various organizations it openly funds.
....

Bangkok, Thailand June 14, 2011 - The degenerate, profiteering liars that populate the Serbian based "CANVAS" organization maintain that while the US government had initially funded them as they overthrew the government of Serbia in 2000, currently the US government does not fund them - that they are privately funded. Unfortunately for these meddling interlopers, the US government itself is "privately owned" by many of the people who fund the organizations they claim as partners.

These partners include:

Albert Einstein Institution (foundation-funded including the corporate-lined Acra Foundation)
United States Institute for Peace (USIP) (funded through Congress)
Freedom House (Neo-Con infested)
International Republican Institute (IRI) (headed by warmonger John McCain)
New Tactics (Ford Foundation-funded, Soros-funded)
Humanity in Action (Ford Foundation-funded, US State Department-funded)

The organization is obviously sensitive about who it is seen dealing with, partnering with, and receiving money from. Knowledge of its true nature and purpose has systematically been lied about from its very inception. Foreign Policy reported that "Like the entire opposition to Milosevic, Otpor [now known as CANVAS] took money from the U.S. government, and lied about it. When the real story came out after Milosevic fell, many Otpor members quit, feeling betrayed." As CANVAS was exposed for its more recent involvement in Egypt, they quickly changed their "Partnership" page to "External Links." In a recent documentary, where CANVAS openly claims responsibility for training and guiding unrest across the planet, they reiterate that they are not funded by the US government. This is a dubious claim at best, considering who they associate with and how their "mission" dovetails with identical efforts by openly US-funded and sponsored organizations like Movements.org.

The documentary produced by Journeyman Pictures features CANVAS, its founder, and the story of how they have influenced "color revolutions" all over the globe. While the documentary is fairly objective about its particular subject matter, namely CANVAS' role in the unrest, within a greater context and amidst overwhelming evidence there is no question at all whether or not these revolutions are entirely engineered and contrived.

More: http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/06/fake-revolutions.html
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people,
it's an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” – Patrick Henry

>>> Global Gulag Media & Forum <<<

Offline Optimus

  • Globalist Destroyer
  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,802
    • GlobalGulag.com
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2011, 01:47:42 AM »
“Spontaneous” demonstrations of thousands of youths pouring out into the streets with such force as to compel the flight of a long-time president… To which country are we alluding: Georgia, Serbia, Myanmar,[1] Ukraine, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Iran, Hungary…? This time it is Tunisia. All of these “revolts” followed the same pattern. Already the Tunisian revolt is being called a “color revolution” by media and political pundits, and it has also been provided with a name; the “Jasmine Revolution,”[2] like the abortive “Green” and “Saffron” Revolutions, and the successful Velvet, Rose, Orange, and Tulip Revolutions, etc.

These “color revolutions” all have a common pattern because they are all planned by the same strategists; namely the Open Society network of money speculator George Soros, who serves as a kind of modern-day Jacob Schiff in funding revolutions;[3] and the National Endowment for Democracy, the latter a post-Trotskyite founded, Congressionally-funded kind of “Comintern” promoting the “world democratic revolution” in the service of plutocracy and under the façade of liberty.

Here is a typical scenario of “color revolutions.” Check it off against the features of the “Jasmine Revolution,” and of the funding by the National Endowment for Democracy to “Tunisian activists,” as described further on:

[Soros' Open Society Institute]… sent a 31-year-old Tbilisi activist named Giga Bokeria to Serbia to meet with members of the Otpor (Resistance) movement and learn how they used street demonstrations to topple dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Then, in the summer, Mr. Soros’s foundation paid for a return trip to Georgia by Otpor activists, who ran three-day courses teaching more than 1,000 students how to stage a peaceful revolution.[4]

Commenting on the “Velvet Revolution” that had just passed over Georgia, MacKinnon described the operations that went into play, following the same patterns as they had in other Soros targeted states[5]:

The Liberty Institute that Mr. Bokeria helped found was instrumental in organizing the street protests that eventually forced Mr. Shevardnadze to sign his resignation papers. Mr. Bokeria says it was in Belgrade that he learned the value of seizing and holding the moral high ground, and how to make use of public pressure — tactics that proved so persuasive on the streets of Tbilisi after this month’s tainted parliamentary election.

In Tbilisi, the Otpor link is seen as just one of several instances in which Mr. Soros gave the anti-Shevardnadze movement a considerable nudge: He also funded a popular opposition television station that was crucial in mobilizing support for this week’s “velvet revolution,” and he reportedly gave financial support to a youth group that led the street protests.[6]

Read more http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/01/18/tunisian-revolt-another-sorosned-jack-up/
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people,
it's an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” – Patrick Henry

>>> Global Gulag Media & Forum <<<

Offline Optimus

  • Globalist Destroyer
  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,802
    • GlobalGulag.com
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2011, 01:55:16 AM »
How Washington Learned to Love Nonviolence
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=141613.0

http://bbvm.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/steve-weissman-how-washington-learned-to-love-nonviolence/

Nonviolence can be a major force for democratic social change, but not when it becomes a tool for covert intervention.

A close-cropped, no-nonsense infantry officer, Col. Robert Helvey was studying at Harvard’s Center for International Affairs on an Army fellowship. One day in 1987, he happened upon a seminar led by Gene Sharp, a draft resister imprisoned for refusing to serve in Korea and a systematic scholar of the kind of strategic non-violence that activists of my generation had helped to develop in the free speech, civil rights, and anti-war movements of the 1960s.

“I had an image of nonviolence as being a bunch of long-haired hippies,” Col. Helvey recalled. But Dr. Sharp had come a long way from his Gandhism roots, and Helvey quickly realized that the older man’s approach had “nothing to do with pacifism.” Sharp was talking “about seizing political power or denying it to others,” and doing it without having to break things or kill people.

The idea fascinated Col. Helvey. He invited Sharp to lunch, spent time at the Albert Einstein Institution (AEI), which Sharp had created in Cambridge in 1983, and came to see his new mentor as “the Clausewitz of the nonviolence movement.” An energetic disciple, Col. Helvey would in time become president of AEI and a forceful champion of nonviolent conflict as a weapon of American intervention in other countries.

Were these interventions good or bad? In my opinion, they had elements of both, at least at the start. But they have become a major danger to democracy, not least our own, and an increasing threat to the lives of those that the United States and its allies encourage to make nonviolent revolutions.
The art of political defiance

Col. Helvey’s first intervention was in Burma, where he had served as military attaché, reporting to the Defense Intelligence Agency. In December 1987, while still a serving officer, he invited two Burmese expatriates to spend several days talking with Gene Sharp about how best to overthrow their country’s brutal military rulers. According to Helvey, the activists went back and explained Sharp’s thinking to other of the regime’s opponents.

Retiring in 1991 from thirty years of active duty, Col. Helvey took up a new career, traveling to the Burmese jungle village of Mannerplaw to run the first of a long series of intensive training sessions in nonviolence for the Democratic Alliance of Burma. Gene Sharp helped design the courses, which Helvey renamed political defiance. With armed struggle, he taught, you attack the generals where they are strongest. With political defiance, you look to hit them where they are weak.

”He used his military skills in strategic planning for nonviolent protest methods,” one of Helvey’s trainees later told Reuters. “Everybody was fascinated by Bob, because he was a military man and was applying that to non-violence.”

Training the Burmese opposition was a small-scale operation, and Washington paid for it largely through its National Endowment for Democracy, or NED, which the Reagan administration had created in 1983 to take over the funding of foreign interventions formerly handled by the Central Intelligence Agency. Washington’s interest in Burma was obvious, given its proximity to China and its enormous reserves of oil and natural gas.

Bringing down a dictator

In March 2000, Col. Helvey scored his biggest coup, running a 4-day training session at the Hilton Hotel in Budapest for more than 20 militants from a Serbian student group called “Otpor!“. Helvey’s purpose was to teach the militants how to undermine the authority of Slobodan Milošević, “the Butcher of the Balkans.”

“His presentation was something that I had never seen in my life, and I have seen maybe 200 trainings and maybe performed 200 or 300,” recalled one of Otpor’s founders, Srdja Popovic. “I am really experienced. But he is a miracle!” Returning to Serbia, Helvey’s students became the backbone and creative masterminds of a multi-million dollar nonviolent revolution financed and stage-managed by Washington, its European allies, and George Soros’s Open Society Institute.

The overthrow of Milošević in the former Yugoslavia led Washington and its allies to finance and organize similar efforts all around the periphery of the former Soviet Union. These included the Rose Revolution in Georgia in 2003, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine in 2004 and 2005, and the Pink or Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan in 2005. In these interventions, Otpor veterans taught what they had learned to militants in the other countries, while hundreds of thousands of ordinary people risked beatings, jail, torture, and even death. But, once the nonviolent protestors brought new governments to power, Washington and the Western Europeans used their influence to extend the North Atlantic Treaty Organization eastward, push for economic privatization and strengthen Western sway over the oil, natural gas, and pipelines from the Caspian Sea, Caucuses, and Central Asia.

Less publicly, Washington and its allies made Optor a permanent part of their arsenal, as described by Strategic Forecasting, Inc. (STRATFOR), a private intelligence newsletter available by subscription. “Otpor strengthened its connections with Western governments and nongovernmental organizations, which provided the group with funding and limited amounts of intelligence about potential weaknesses in regimes they were already targeting,” STRATFOR explained.

    “The tactics used in the crucible in Belgrade were ‘marketed’ in documentaries and training manuals. Otpor became more than ‘just’ a student group and transformed itself into the Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies (CANVAS). Among the group’s strongest allies are Freedom House and the Albert Einstein Institute and, through them, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the US Department of State.”

CANVAS itself has been anything but transparent about its funding and intelligence ties to Western governments. But the group proudly put the STRATFOR analysis on its website, while Freedom House confirmed in its annual report for 2001 that it received funding from NED, USAID, and the State Department and, in turn, continued to fund the Otpor students. In 2005, the U.S. Institute of Peace provided a grant to CANVAS to publish Nonviolent Struggle: 50 Crucial Points by Srdja Popovic and two other Otpor veterans. All of which put the lie to the group’s oft-repeated claim that “CANVAS does not accept any governmental funding.”

When a military coup fails

In April 2003, Reuters reporter Pascal Fletcher went to a university campus in east Caracas. On a closed classroom door, he found a sign that read, “Seminar on strategic marketing.” Inside he found “representatives of Venezuela’s broad-based but fragmented opposition, who are struggling to regroup after failing to force Hugo Chávez from office in an anti-government strike.” According to Reuters, they were meeting with Col. Robert Helvey, “a consultant with the private US Albert Einstein Institution.” Another AEI staff member, Chris Miller, also participated.

Opponents of Chávez had previously met with Gene Sharp in Cambridge after the failure of the U.S.-backed military coup against Chávez in 2002. These contacts continued after Col. Helvey’s visit to Caracas and included a privately funded workshop in March 2005 in Boston, in which two Otpor veterans took part. The Center for Applied NonViolent Actions and Strategies (CANVAS) in Belgrade then trained five student leaders from Venezuela in October 2005, and another four in October 2007. CANVAS also set up an office in Venezuela in latter part of 2007.

“Another color revolution may be forming — in Latin America,” wrote the sympathetic STRATFOR. “When you see students at five Venezuelan universities hold simultaneous demonstrations, you will know that the training is over and the real work has begun.”

Signs of this “Marigold Revolution” became visible in May 2007, after Chávez refused to renew the broadcasting license for the privately owned Radio Caracas Televisión (RCTV), which had openly backed the military coup in 2002. The newly created Venezuelan Student Resistance took to the streets in their thousands, proclaiming their nonviolence and dedication to free speech. The student resistors then staged dozens of marches throughout the country to oppose Chávez in a constitutional referendum in which he tried to remove term limits so that he could run for president as many times as he wanted.

Mostly middle-class and leaning to the right, but including some on the left who found Chávez autocratic, the protestors openly acknowledged their debt to Otpor and the thinking of Gene Sharp. They painted their hands white to show their innocent intentions. They put flowers into the rifle barrels of the security forces. And, they staged street theater to mock Chávez and the constitutional rewrite he was promoting. The students made a significant impact on the December 2007 referendum, which Chávez lost 51% to 49%, one of his only electoral defeats.

Chávez put much of the blame on Gene Sharp and the Albert Einstein Foundation for attempting to overthrow him with “a soft coup.” In a personal reply to Chávez, Sharp offered his usual disavowal. “Our work,” he insisted, “has not been backed by powerful political or economic interests in the United States or internationally.”

Washington and its nonviolent allies are already preparing similar, if smaller, interventions against populist governments in Ecuador and Bolivia and will likely use the same tactics against post-Castro Cuba.

Iran’s Green Revolution

Nowhere has Washington’s encouragement of nonviolent revolution caused greater grief than in Iran. While President Obama publicly appeared above the fray, his State Department used its Persian language radio services and its considerable influence with Twitter and Facebook to back the election campaign of the tainted reformist Mir-Hossein Mousavi and to spur on the popular protests against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the hard-line ayatollahs that back him. I have previously written at length about the intervention itself. Here I want to consider what it means, especially to those of us who support the aspirations of so many Iranians for a freer and more democratic country.

Many friends hated that I raised the issue of American intervention. Few denied the facts I presented. They simply preferred to turn a blind eye. All they wanted to consider were inconclusive arguments that Mousavi had won the election, which many reputable scholars still dispute, and the need to stand in solidarity with the protestors, with which I agree. But, unless we explicitly acknowledge and condemn the American intervention, our solidarity will end up pouring more money into the National Endowment for Democracy, the CIA, and the State Department’s propaganda radios. Do we really want to do that?

Other friends have argued that most of the money for training Iranians in nonviolent protest came not from Washington but from private sources, primarily Wall Street financier Peter Ackerman and his International Center on Nonviolent Conflict. This could be true, though the funding of much of the training remains secret. But what difference? Once Washington unleashed its propaganda radio and Internet resources, it made little difference who trained the non-violent protestors.

Finally, and most important to me, the undeniable evidence of Western intervention, both private and governmental, has made it far too easy for Ahmadinejad to crack down on the Iranian protestors. We should clearly condemn the crackdown and attempt to defend the activists. But our greatest show of solidarity would be to stop Washington’s continuing intervention.

[A veteran of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and the New Left monthly Ramparts, Steve Weissman lived for many years in London, working as a magazine writer and television producer. He now lives and works in France. For previous articles by Steve Weissman on The Rag Blog, including those about Iran's "Green Revolution," go here.]
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people,
it's an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” – Patrick Henry

>>> Global Gulag Media & Forum <<<

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2011, 02:18:57 AM »
THE PLOT TO PUT GENERAL BETRAY US IN POWER?
JUST LIKE KISSINGER'S MILITARY COUP IN EGYPT?

WALL STREET PROTESTS, 9 11, THE CIA

http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2011/10/wall-street-protests-9-11-cia.html
Saturday, October 01, 2011

Are they helping Petraeus?

All people power is ultimately run by the CIA.

What about the Wall Street protests?

"The demonstrations may appear spontaneous...

"But it is easy to see gatekeepers and countergangs operating in their midst, often with a frank counterinsurgency agenda.

"Occupy Wall Street in particular shows the heavy influence of union bureaucrats."

(An Emergency Program for Anti-Wall Street Protestors: Don’t Let Soros Hijack the Movement)

Is there a plot to put Petraeus into power?

"One personality above all others is being groomed by intelligence operatives and policy wonks, while built-up by the corporate media in the eyes of the public to intercede in America's accelerating political, economic, and even global tactical decline.

"This man is General David Petraeus."

(WARNING: Corporate-Fascist Military Coup Brewing in US?)

Does everyone work for the CIA?

Remember the people-power protests that toppled the Shah? The present regime in Iran was put into power by the CIA. (The Ayatollahs and the CIA) Al Qaeda is run by the CIA. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad suggests 9 11 was carried out by the CIA. An al Qaeda magazine called Inspire attacks Ahmadinejad's 9/11 claims. Ahmadinejad may be a cia agent? Ahmadinejad suggests that Inspire is run by the CIA. The Iranian state news says "reports released by al Qaeda are usually believed to be produced by the CIA." Inspire recently featured a eulogy for Osama bin Laden, who long worked for the CIA.

Conclusion: the CIA usually controls both sides of the argument.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2011, 02:31:10 AM »
Question: What is General Petraeus advertised as?

Answer: A commander of operations in a warzone where next generation counterinsurgency operations are the entire gameplan to win.

That answer is the false narrative, but the NWO does not care if no one believes it, they still position their chess pieces as if they were as advertised and the NWO did advertise him as the commander required during such insurgencies. So they are now building their insurgency all over the country. They need it so widespread that it will require the counterinsurgency commander of record who happens to just have taken over the CIA. Well if this is their plan, then everyone needs to understand what COIN/Counterinsurgency is, how it originated, and how it was/is used...

THE ORIGIN OF COIN: THE RULING CLASS MUST MANUFACTURE A FAKE INSURGENCY TO JUSTIFY A COUNTER-INSURGENCY! THE ORIGIN OF COIN: THE RULING CLASS MUST MANUFACTURE A FAKE INSURGENCY TO JUSTIFY A COUNTER-INSURGENCY! THE ORIGIN OF COIN: THE RULING CLASS MUST MANUFACTURE A FAKE INSURGENCY TO JUSTIFY A COUNTER-INSURGENCY! THE ORIGIN OF COIN: THE RULING CLASS MUST MANUFACTURE A FAKE INSURGENCY TO JUSTIFY A COUNTER-INSURGENCY! THE ORIGIN OF COIN: THE RULING CLASS MUST MANUFACTURE A FAKE INSURGENCY TO JUSTIFY A COUNTER-INSURGENCY! THE ORIGIN OF COIN: THE RULING CLASS MUST MANUFACTURE A FAKE INSURGENCY TO JUSTIFY A COUNTER-INSURGENCY! THE ORIGIN OF COIN: THE RULING CLASS MUST MANUFACTURE A FAKE INSURGENCY TO JUSTIFY A COUNTER-INSURGENCY! THE ORIGIN OF COIN: THE RULING CLASS MUST MANUFACTURE A FAKE INSURGENCY TO JUSTIFY A COUNTER-INSURGENCY!


Colonel Dorff

Well, of course there wasn't any insurgency, but if you have a counterinsurgency you will stay in business because everyone assumes an insurgency. That keeps you looting and raping behind the lines in style while the rest of the army is dying on the front lines. I understand the Americans developed it to a fine point in the Mei Lai massacre. That was a classic example of an aggressive counterinsurgency to defeat a non-existent insurgency.

THE MAN IN THE GLASS BOOTH
EUROCRATS, NAZIS, AND THE ORIGIN OF COUNTERINSURGENCY OPERATIONS

Do any of the think tanks who are writing 500 page treatises on COIN operations ever mention where COIN was most used in the 20th century? I highly doubt it. Just rent a copy of the movie "The Man in the Glass Booth" and the origin of the operations called COIN or counterinsurgency are clearly exposed. The movie is about a concentration camp victim who poses as a Nazi to get prosecuted for war crimes. Since he realizes that the Nurenberg trials did not reveal enough of the truth of the New World Order operations, he decides to let a bit more truth out than the Eurocrat controlled Nurenberg trials did. Here is a relevant excerpt during the trial:


Prosecutor to Mr. Berger (a witness who was a videographer for the NWO Nazis): What was your occupation on October, 1943?

Mr. Berger: I was a cinematographer with the rank of captain in the ministry of information under Josef Goebbles.

Prosecutor: Where were you on October 11, 1943?

Mr. Berger: I was in the village of Tania, occupied Poland.

Prosecutor: What were you doing there?

Mr. Berger: I had been ordered to photograph a punitive operation conducted by the counterinsurgency section of the SS in the ghetto of Tania.

Prosecutor: Would you describe for the court what you photographed?

Mr. Berger: Our opening sequence was staged before dawn. I remember we used 5 kiliwatt lamps in the streets. Colonel Dorff's "Black Shirts" rolled up in open trucks. They ran into the houses and ran upstairs and threw all of the males out of the windows.

Prosecutor: How old were they?

Mr. Berger: Under 13 and over 60. The others of course were already in the camps working.

Prosecutor: Tell the court how you became certain the age of the victims.

Mr. Berger: We had to move in for closeups. They held back throwing some of them out of the windows so that we could change our camera setups.

Prosecutor: And then, Mr. Berger?

Mr. Berger: Those that could walk were made to stand against the wall others were tied in place some 50-60 all together. Then as we moved the camera along the wall behind the guns, they fired the guns in sucession.

Prosecutor: What happened?

Mr. Berger: Well, a 9.2 milimeter shell is very powerful to use at close range. The people exploded.

Prosecutor: They disintegrated into pieces of severed arms and legs.

Mr. Berger: Yes, yes.

Prosecutor: Then what happened? Tell us Mr. Berger.

Mr. Berger: The corpses, the few that were intact, and the pieces of the others were trucked back to the center of the ghetto and dumped into a pile. I'd say at least reaching the second story houses. By this time it was full daylight. Colonel Dorff's troops were holding back the mothers and daughters with bayonets. Then, on his signal, they were all allowed to rush to the pile to find the pieces of their loved ones. Or, to try to assemble what they found.

Prosecutor: Describe what happened.

Mr. Berger: An old lady would find an arm with a familiar ring and would dislodge parts of bodies until the parts came tumbling down. Sometimes a woman would discover the head of her son or father. When that happened, Colonel Dorff would beg us to shoot extreme close-ups with handheld video cameras.

Witness is removed and the questioning goes to Colonel Dorff.

Prosecutor: What was done with the film, Colonel Dorff?

Colonel Dorff: We made a title which blosomed out of these last close-ups. It said in Polish: "Obey the occupation or this will happen to your town." We played it first run in every theater.

Prosecutor: So these executions were staged deliberately for the cameras?

Colonel Dorff: Well, you see, Josef needed propaganda to make himself look useful and to keep his office in business, and I needed a counterinsurgency operation for the same reason.

Prosecutor: Clarify please.

Colonel Dorff: Well, of course there wasn't any insurgency, but if you have a counterinsurgency you will stay in business because everyone assumes an insurgency. That keeps you looting and raping behind the lines in style while the rest of the army is dying on the front lines. I understand the Americans developed it to a fine point in the Mei Lai massacre. That was a classic example of an aggressive counterinsurgency to defeat a non-existent insurgency.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2011, 03:13:29 AM »
WHO ARE THE TERRORISTS?
WHO ARE IN THE PROCESS OF A COUP D'ETAT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT?
WHO IS FOLLOWING HITLER'S TECHNIQUES OF TERRORISM?
WHO ARE THE FANATICS WHO HAVE STATED THEY WANT TO KILL 25 MILLION AMERICANS?
WHO ARE THE SLEEPER CELLS AND HOW ARE THEY TRIGGERED?
WHO CREATES TERRORISTS BY INDOCTRINATING PEOPLE INTO FAUX RELIGIOUS CAUSES INCLUDING GAIA?
WHO CREATES TERRORISTS BY INDOCTRINATING PEOPLE INTO FAUX POLITICAL CAUSES INCLUDING ANTI-CAPITALISM?
WHO FUNDS THE TERRORISTS?
FOLLOW THE MONEY AND THE EVIDENCE...



Just so we are all clear who the enemy is and how they operate...

"Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." -Sun Tzu

"To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by means of one created crisis after another and then “managing” such crises. This will confuse and demoralize the population to the extent where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale will result. In the case of the United States, an agency for crisis management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first disclosed in 1980. There will be more on FEMA as we proceed." -John Coleman Committee of 300 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_02.htm

Levin was the author of a work entitled “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club of Rome publication concerning how to break down the morale of nations and individual leaders.

Here is an extract of the document:

“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in exactly this tactic: keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promise of good treatment together with the spreading of contradictory news make the structure of the situation unclear, then the individual may cease to know whether a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal.

Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks are paralyzed by the severe inner conflict in regard to what to do.”

This Club of Rome blueprint applies to COUNTRIES as well as to individuals, particularly the government leaders of those countries. We in the U.S. need not think that “Oh well, this is America, and those kinds of things just do not happen here.” Let me assure you that they ARE happening in the U.S., and perhaps more so than in any other country.

The Levin-Club of Rome plan is designed to demoralize us all so that in the end we feel we should follow whatever it is that is planned for us. We WILL follow Club of Rome orders like sheep. Any seemingly strong leader who SUDDENLY APPEARS to “rescue” the nation must be regarded with the utmost suspicion. Remember that Khomeini was groomed for years by British intelligence, especially during his time in Paris, before he suddenly appeared as the savior of Iran. Boris Yeltsin is from the same M16-SIS stable.

The Club of Rome feels confident that it has carried out it Committee of 300 mandate to “soften up” the United States. After 45 years of waging war on the people of this nation, who will doubt that it has indeed accomplished its task? Look around and see how we have been demoralized.

[...]

With the U.S. spiritually, morally bankrupted, with our industrial base destroyed throwing 30 million people out of work with our big cities ghastly cesspools of every imaginable crime with a murder rate almost three times higher than any other country, with 4 million homeless, with corruption in government reaching endemic proportions, who will gainsay that the United States is ready to collapse from within, into the waiting arms of the New Dark Age One World Government?

[...]

We as a nation are ready to accept the demise of the United States of America and the American way of life, once the envy of the entire world.
 
Do not think this has happened on its own— the old “times are changing” syndrome. Time does not change anything, PEOPLE do.

Hey Tavistock...I got your apathy right here you pieces of psychopathic crapola!  


Just so we are clear on WTF is going on...

Banksters have bet on Barry Soetoro, Bill Ayers, John Holdren, John Holdren, Rahm Emanuel, Elena Kagan, etc. to further the continued destruction of the middle class in America. This is the softening up period. Previously, the banksters got 8 good years of destroying America from George W. Bush.

If anyone thinks that Bill Ayers, John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, Rahm Emanuel, Elena Kagan, and other globalist revolutionary idealists give a flying crap about the American people, they are insane. Their entire philosophy is based on their "higher knowledge" of society and that they need to force a revolution to get their way. They also believe they need to do it in secrecy using deception, false flag terrorist acts, lying to the public, and any other machievellian protocol available.

The banksters still control the strings and are using these idealogues to further the NWO goal which is to remove borders, remove sovereignty, remove useless eaters, and re-educate the zombies that make it through their violent and genocidal depopulation plans. They are using the Soetoro deception to destroy all American industries. They took out the auto industry, the banking industry, the healthcare industry, and are now going after the energy industry.

IMO, this group of psychos most probably were part of various Kissinger/Rockefeller study groups [MK Ultra sub-programs] where the purpose is to manipulate the minds of America's youth into anti-American revolutionary agendas. It is not like there is no evidence of this, Ted Kazcinski was at Harvard and because of his intellect and because of how much he loved America, the family, etc. he was put into one of these programs. He was trained to be a sophisticated revolutionary. He was being trained to hate America, hate the Family, hate Capitalism, hate Monotheism. He was trained to be a violent terrorist against capitalism, against American ideals. This is on record, proven, documented, incontrovertible.


[Side note: The ivy league schools are used for this recruiting, they are completely owned by Bilderberg/Committee of 300 and regularly set seeds for various controlled movements to take shape. That is why you always see the same people from the same schools hand picked to be the highest level puppets in this country. Yale was founded to protect the East India Trading Company's control over the international drug and slavery trade. So the NWO uses a different controlled agenda every 4-12 years using conditioned puppets.]

[Disclaimer: This site detests any provocation of violence in any way whatsoever. The insane actions taught to Kaczynski in the unconsented MK Ultra studies forced upon him without his knowledge at Harvard University are deplorable. Here is the Forum's stand on activism as explained in the subheading of the activism room: This forum is to promote non-violent non-cooperation as MLK, Jr. and Gandhi did. Do not ever, even as innuendo, promote violence on this forum. Report others who do. Anyone promoting violence will be banned and posts removed (at the least). The promoting of violence is a CoIntelPro tactic to stop lawful discourse against corrupt government tyranny. Research the Church Commission report and you will find that 25% of the KKK during the 1960's were FBI and FBI assets. They were the ones in the cars and engaged in the conversations promoting the horrendous violence that occured throught this great land. They also were promoting violence within the constitutional black nationalist movements in order to shut that down (see CoIntelPro: War on Black America). Do not let the new CoIntelPro do the same thing with the truth movement. More here: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=60394.0 Additionally, this site condemns the insane actions by elite chess players like Kissinger and others who exterminate millions via false flag terrorism and mockingbird psyops.]


Here are some links into the minds of these violent revolutionary terrorist lunatics:

Bill Ayers' manifesto calling for a false flag terrorist act to start a "Prarie Fire" that will genocide millions
http://zombietime.com/prairie_fire/
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1166148/prairie_fire_william_ayers_revolutionary.html
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Prairie-fire.pdf
Here is CounterPunch's Ron Jacobs praising the insanity: http://www.counterpunch.org/jacobs07242004.html

John Holdren's psychopathic lunacy and depopulation agenda
http://www.rense.com/general87/holdren.htm
http://healthcaretodiefor.com/?p=108
http://nationalexpositor.com/News/1666.html
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread566544/pg1

Cass Sunstein's insatiable and obsessive desire to exterminate any free thought, to deprive humanity of self determination:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-information-czar-calls-for-banning-free-speech.html
http://21stcenturywire.com/2010/05/23/obama-internet-chief-dr-cass-sunstein-wants-to-turn-off-the-lights-on-free-speech/

Rham Emanuel was brought up to believe in using terrorism to get his way:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5337807.ece
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_5870.shtml
http://gawker.com/5078472/obama-already-palling-around-with-terrorists
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/us-election/rahm-emanuels-father-an-israeli-terrorist-14043727.html
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/05/is-rahm-emanuel-an-american-kapo/

Elena Kagan is an elitist nut who wants to take away all individual rights and give them to corporations
http://www.examiner.com/x-27672-Portland-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2010m5d19-Elena-Kagan-Obama-SCOTUS-nominee-avowed-socialist-shill-for-Shariah-antiUS-military
http://www.frcblog.com/2010/05/change-watch-elena-kagan-supreme-court-nominee/
http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/elen-kagan-believes-global-law-trumps-constitutional-law/
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/elena-kagan-some-free-speech-should-be-disappeared/

Van Jones is not a fan of free market capitalism and the idea of financial freedom (only resigned because he still had a conscience when it came to 9/11 truth)
http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/loudon-obama-appoints-former-communist-to-white-house-green-job/
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2110435/van_jones_obamas_communist_green_jobs.html
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m7d17-Van-Jones-Green-Jobs-Czar-a-selfdescribed-communist-arrested-during-Rodney-King-riots

John O. Brennan believes that the Banksters should have American citizens exterminated/assassinated if they get in the way of the CFR/Bilderberg plan to end US sovereignty.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Homegrown-Terrorists-Growing-Threat/2010/06/25/id/363052
http://www.infowars.com/how-many-americans-are-targeted-for-assassination/

Hillary Clinton is a War Criminal who also uses false flag terrorism to achieve the destruction of America
http://www.clintonmemoriallibrary.com/clintcrimefamily.html
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/crime2.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/965761/posts
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8438833120507357139
http://www.antiwar.com/pilger/?articleid=13303
http://www.heraldscotland.com/death-squad-leader-was-top-cia-agent-1.829131
There is just too much, much is in this board: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=305.0


Larry Grathwohl on Ayers' plan for American:
Re-education camps and the need to kill millions

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWMIwziGrAQ


Eyewitness to the Ayers Revolution
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/eyewitness-to-the-ayers-revolution/
Posted By Bob Owens On October 28, 2008

When Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn led the domestic terrorist group Weather Underground in 1969, a chance meeting led Army veteran Larry Grathwohl into joining the group. Grathwohl served as a courier, running messages between the group’s leadership (called the “Weather Bureau”) and individual cells that were to carry out attacks. Grathwohl was also an informant for the FBI. In an interview from the 1982 documentary No Place To Hide that recently surfaced, Grathwohl discussed what the Weathermen intended to do after overthrowing the U.S. government, including what they would do with those Americans who refused to embrace communism [1]. I asked, “Well what is going to happen to those people we can’t reeducate, that are diehard capitalists?” And the reply was that they’d have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further, they estimated they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers. And when I say “eliminate,” I mean “kill.” Twenty-five million people. I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people. And they were dead serious.



These are the front men. Some are just greedy psychos who got caught up in a slavery system where the more they sell out their souls, the more material trinkets they get. Some are like what Ted Kaczinski was supposed to be:

Harvard Reveals Ted Kaczynski is an MK-Ultra  Mind Control Victim. In June of 2000, Harvard University Invoices also linked Kaczynski to the CIA  [LA Times] as a subject in the CIA Mind Control Program MK-Ultra. The brilliant awkward 16 year old Kaczynski met with Henry A Murray (of Mk-Ultra LSD Scandal fame) in 1959 on his third day at Harvard and every week thereafter. [Atlantic Monthly][Net] Interestingly, Ted Kaczynski's Mk-Ultra Codename was "Lawful"...mind control slang for "Eureka here's our guy" ! The public has never heard Ted Kaczynski's voice to date, nor seen him speak. The murder of MK-Ultra scientist Frank Olson was later covered up by Donald Rumsfeld and Cheney [Rumsfeld]. http://www.unabombers.com/

The controllers of Harvard/Yale and all the other schools who groom supposed "leaders of America" conduct behavioral modification sessions to blow apart the pro-American mentality of our most gifted youths in order to fill them with New World Order concepts. This type of behavior modification is also done in the military as we have seen with Tim McVeigh who felt he was doing something for the greater good above the sovereign rights of "We the People".

And who controls these top social systems? Behind the scenes are the same old players...

Brzezinski, Harriman, Rockefeller and our overseas wizards: Houses of Rothschild, Windsor, and Orange-Nassau







Prince Philip


40 years ago, Prince Philip gave the following instructions...

A new criterion has been added, the conservation of the environment so that in the long run life, including human life, can continue. This new consideration must be taken into account at all levels and in all departments of government and in the boardrooms of every industrial enterprise. It is no longer sufficient simply to quantify the elements of existence as in old-fashioned material economics; conservation means taking notice of the quality of existence as well...

The problem is of course to give some value to that quality and perhaps the only way to do this is to try and work out the cost in terms of loss of amenities, loss of holiday and recreation facilities, loss of property values, loss of contact with nature, loss of health standards and loss of food resources, if proper conservation methods are not used.

Looked at in that light it may well turn out that money spent on proper pollution control, urban and rural planning and the control of exploitation of wild stocks of plants or animals on land and in the sea, is the less expensive alternative in the long run...The conservation of nature, the proper care for the human environment and a general concern for the long-term future of the whole of our planet are absolutely vital if future generations are to have a chance to enjoy their existence on this earth.


-The Australian Conservation Foundation, Canberra (April 1970)



It is clear in the past 40 years that over 99.9% of the industrialized world has been put into this control system that Prince Philip said was necessary. Less wages, less amenities, loss of holiday, loss of property value, lossed contact with UN controlled nature preserves, loss of health standards, loss of control of food resources. What sacrifices have Prince Philip and his Bilderberg buddies made for the past 40 years?



THEY NEED PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS TO JUSTIFY THE USE OF CIVILIAN TRAUMA AND SERVITUDE WEAPONS AS BRAGGED ABOUT BY ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI IN 1970!!



AJ's show with with Dr. Blaylock was right on the money:

Today Alex welcomes back Dr. Russell Blaylock, board certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer, to discuss lithium and fluoride being added to local water supplies.


Comment from MarkCentury on another thread:

In the 2008 movie "The Happening" mankind is assaulted by biochemical weapons that destroys their natural survival instincts leading victims to fearlessly commit suicide by walking into a lion's den or throwing themselves under a lawn mower.

In the final frames of this movie we see a school bus and on that bus a large number is visible:  

2010

Now 2010 has arrived and we read bizzare stories of shrimp drugged on prozac committing suicide as they fearlessly throw themselves into danger.

http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/shrimp-on-prozac-commit-suicide

Today Alex Jones released an impassioned video "The Media pushes brain eating vaccines" where he warns us that the same attack is being carried out against mankind.  

http://www.infowars.com/establishment-media-pushes-brain-eating-vaccines/

Vaccines are being used to deliver live virus bioweapons that re-engineer our brains by destroying our natural survival instincts.  This at the same time a sudden chorus of academics are pushing sedating the masses by adding toxic lithium to the water supply.  As Alex explains, this combined biochemcal assault will render the masses unable to resist the globalists as they carry out the next phases of their incremental plan of global enslavement and extermination.

Those seeking the destruction of mankind operate under a code requiring them to give advance notice.  Could the prominent but fleeting date of "2010" in the movie "The Happening" have been a warning that this is the year we would all be thrown under the biochemical bus?

Mark




Read this article:

HAARP, Haiti, Brzezinski and the NWO
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/printer_5495.shtml
By Jerry Mazza Online Journal Associate Editor


My comment:

What is important to note is Jerry Mazza's evaluation and comparison of the two moments in historical context:

He actually wrote a chapter called “How to Wreck the Environment” in his book, Unless Peace Comes. Of course, this came at the height of the Vietnam brutality. Given the aura of violence similar to today’s, Gordon described in his chapter, among other things, “polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brain wave manipulation using the planet’s energy fields.”



Also important to note is Brzezinski's invisible hand in all of these narratives pervasive among the elite controllers of society:

As of 1970, Brzezinski predicted HAARP could be used for “a more controlled and directed society” linked to technology. This society would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly superior scientific know-how.” Furthermore, Dr. Strangelove states, “Unhindered by the restrains of traditional liberal values, this elite [the New World Order of today] would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it exploits.”

And thus spake Brzezinski, who also predicted that it would take an inciting incident like Pearl Harbor (i.e., 9/11) to engage the normally peaceful American population to go to war on a march for world hegemony (i.e., The War on Terror). And he was spot on.

Zbig is not afraid, in fact, is lauded for thinking down avenues that would make most of us shiver with disgust. Regrettably, his forecasts tend to prove accurate, because they inspire the worst people to do the worst things. And so, these “tools for the elite” and their temptation to use them increases incredibly. The policies to use them are in place. As to the “stepping stones” that could be used to reach this highly controlled techno-society, Brezinski expected them to be “persisting social crisis” and the use of mass media to gain the public’s confidence. Again, he’s spot on.






As to the “stepping stones” that could be used to reach this highly controlled techno-society, Brezinski expected them to be “persisting social crisis” and the use of mass media to gain the public’s confidence. Again, he’s spot on.




RockefellerFoundation predicts for 2012

PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS

caused by pandemic, economic collapse, marauding gangs

So, I was reading this article (I think it has already been linked to by other people on here - since Alan Watt linked to it a couple of days ago - but as far as I know, this is the original article and contains some more stuff that the link Alan Watt put up did not have ) - and it made mention of this consortium called Global Business Network.


The English Ideology and WIRED Magazine

Part Three Of Three

Techno-Utopianism: The Final Imperial Solution
by Mark Stahlman November 22nd, 1996

http://web.archive.org/web/20011226171744/www.rewired.com/96/Fall/1122.html


This snippet in particular piqued my curiosity
Quote
No less chilling is the scenarios planning exercise that WIRED's wizards-behind-the-curtain perform on their multi-national clients. From General Motors to AT&T, the Global Business Network (GBN) charges hefty sums to show the yellow-brick-road towards "ByteCity" to strategic planners and top corporate brass. In one recent and rare public discussion of the results, GM's top planning team defined the three "alternative futures" which emerged after years of GBN counseling. The first is just like our world and, so by definition, is not very interesting. The second is an eco-fascist regime in which car designs are completely "Green" and the companies can only follow orders. The third is the fun one, however. This is the world in which armed gangs roam the streets and surface travel is a series of car chases. This scenario has already been anticipated with a Cadillac that includes armored protection and a "panic" button installed in the middle of the dashboard. The car has a satellite tracking system built in and it can call the local authorities (presumably your multi-national's private swat-team) and get help when you get trapped by the natives.


So naturally, I looked into Global Business Network. This consortium is kind of like Wells 'The Samurai' corporate overlord board - every bigwig company you can imagine that is into some type of big industry is among its members.

Global Business Network

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Business_Network

Funding / Members - Corporations

I don't have time to list all of the companies, so let's just list for the sake of interest some of the key companies that consider themselves to be members - these companies also provide for the organization's funding:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Business_Network#Funding

  • AT&T
  • Bechtel
  • Booz Allen & Hamilton
  • Coca-Cola Company
  • Dow Chemical
  • DuPont
  • EDS (Electronic Data Systems)
  • Fannie Mae
  • Freddie Mac
  • ExxonMobil
  • General Electric
  • Heineken (My note: The Dutch beer-brewer)
  • Hewlett Packard/HP
  • IBM (My note: Big surprise, huh?)
  • Intel
  • L'Oreal
  • Lucent Corporation
  • Microsoft
  • Monsanto
  • Procter & Gamble
  • Reuters
  • Sandia National Laboratories
  • Shell Oil/Dutch Royal Shell
  • Toyota
  • Sun Microsystems (My note: See, I don't want to hear anymore crap from some techies that Sun Microsystems was 'once' good prior to being taken over by the evil 'Oracle' - to hell with that - they were ALWAYS part of the hive mind - stop sucking up to controlled opposition is my message to these people - forget about the SPARC processors and all that shit and realize these guys didn't give a rip about you, the individual, or any semblance of human dignity - same as all the other corporate technocrats)
  • Xerox

The list is far longer than this, but you get the drill - any corporation worth its salt is a member and/or provides funding for it.

Stewart Brand, Whole Earth Catalog, Wired Magazine, Global Business Network

This ties back into Stewart Brand - the guy behind the Whole Earth Catalog, the founding of Wired Magazine, and the main progenitor of this entire techno-utopia 'scientific dictatorship' that the Unabomber railed against. Coincidentally, he was also a co-founder of Global Business Network.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stewart_Brand

Quote
Brand is a co-founder of the Global Business Network (GBN) (1988) [4]; the The Long Now Foundation (1995) [5], "whose core project is the construction of a 10,000 year clock called The Clock of the Long Now"; the ALL Species Foundation (2001) [6], "to find and document every life form on Earth" [7]; and the Long Bets Foundation (2001), "an arena for competitive, accountable predictions" and "to foster better long-term thinking." [8][9]



Anyway, here comes the big one - this is a report produced by the Rockefeller Foundation in cooperation with Global Business Network in May 2010 - and it shows four possible future scenarios that the world might be headed into. Let's discuss this, shall we.

http://www.gbn.com/consulting/article_details.php?id=101&breadcrumb=consulting

http://www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/GBN&Rockefeller%20scenarios.technology&development.pdf

Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
This report was produced by

The Rockefeller Foundation
and Global Business Network.
May 2010




Let's see what Peter Schwartz, President of Global Business Network, has to say about these 'scenarios' firsthand:

Quote

Scenario planning is a powerful tool precisely because the future is unpredictable and shaped by many interacting variables. Scenarios enable us to think creatively and rigorously about the different ways these forces may interact, while forcing us to challenge our own assumptions about what we believe or hope the future will be. Scenarios embrace and weave together multiple perspectives and provide an ongoing framework for spotting and making sense of important changes as they emerge. Perhaps most importantly, scenarios give us a new, shared language that deepens our conversations about the future and how we can help to shape it.

The Rockefeller Foundation has already used this project as an opportunity to clarify and advance the relationship between technology and development. Through interviews and the scenario workshops, they have engaged a diverse set of people - from different geographies, disciplines, and sectors - to identify the key forces driving change, to explore the most critical uncertainties, and to develop challenging yet plausible scenarios and implications.  









Zbigniew Brzezinski pushes Rockefeller agenda of

PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS

to justify more weapons against the American people on LIVE TV!


Zbigniew Brzezinski pushes Rockefeller agenda of civil war on LIVE TV!



Zbigniew Brzezinski: Obama The New Mr. 'Malaise'
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2010/07/16/m-word-zbigniew-brzezinski-says-obama-presiding-over-age-malaise
By Mark Finkelstein
Fri, 07/16/2010 - 08:35 ET
 

Can you hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth emanating from 1600 Pennslyvania Avenue?  It's Pres. Obama & Co. reacting to Zbigniew Brzezinki pinning on Barack Obama the word that doomed Jimmy Carter: "malaise."

On Morning Joe, Carter's former national security adviser said there "is a sense of pervasive malaise" in America. What's worse, suggested Zbig, Pres. Obama hasn't been able to figure out how to deal with the malaise. Ruh-roh!
 


ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: I think we're now going through a phase in which there is a sense of pervasive malaise, which affects different groups in society in different ways.

So people are dissatisfied; they're slightly worried; they don't see a good certain future for themselves or for the country, but in their own narrow sphere.


There's no grand mobilizing idea. And I have a sense that Obama, who started so well, and who really captivated people—he captivated me!—has not been able yet to generate some sort of organizing idea for an age which combines a malaise that's pervasive and percolating, and complexity.. . .  


PAT BUCHANAN: We need a new paradigm!

BREZINSKI: And the President hasn't articulated it.

BUCHANAN: No he hasn't.

BREZINSKI: There goes any further invitation to the White House!



Brzezinski clearly understood the personal implications of his downer of a diagnosis: "there goes any further invitation to the White House!"  The panel all enjoyed a good chuckle, but could anything be much worse for PBO than to be seen as the reincarnation of Jimmy Carter?

Historical Note:  Here's more on the Malaise Speech itself.  Interestingly, although Carter adviser Pat Caddell used "malaise" in his notes for the speech, Carter himself never actually employed the word, speaking instead of a "crisis of the spirit in our country."

No Goneril, She: Good daughter that she is, Mika tried to put the best face on father's words.  As Zbig lamented the end of his White House invitations, Mika twice pointed out that he had said "yet."  In other words, it's not that pops had painted the president an irredeemable failure.  It's just that PBO hasn't come up with a solution to the malaise "yet."
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2011, 04:49:04 AM »
So foreign terrorists are now coming to the US to train our youth into black ops revolutions similar to the genocidal ones in Eastern Europe.

What other odd events involves Eastern European terrorists with command and control over a civilian population on American soil?

CASE STUDY: American Police Force and Hardin
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=463.0



Why don't they just wheel out the dead body of Bin Laden for a lecture at occupy wall street, I mean really, WTF?
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Effie Trinket

  • member
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,293
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #10 on: October 06, 2011, 10:42:41 AM »
http://wagingnonviolence.org/2011/03/people-power-video-game-now-available/

‘People Power’ video game now available
by Eric Stoner | March 10, 2011, 3:07 pm

This short video by Voice of America looks at “People Power: The Game of Civil Resistance,” a video game that has just been released by York-Zimmerman. The TV and film company, which has also produced several important documentaries on nonviolent action, including Bringing Down a Dictator, about Otpor and the student-led movement that brought Slobodan Milosevic down in 2000:

    …hired [Optor leader Ivan] Marovic to help create video games – that show non-violent strategies to help remove oppressive governments.  The second, and most recent game is “People Power – The Game of Civil Resistance.”  It contains fictional scenarios in which the leader of a non-violent movement uses tactics such as street protests, strikes and boycotts.  Speaking from Belgrade, Serbia, Marovic said people who play the game are likely to be young and educated.

    “The game allows you to see all the complexities of a political struggle, and to kind of focus on all the nuances, and all the details that are necessary, in order to make the right move,” he said.

When I attended the Fletcher Summer Institute last year I had the opportunity to try the game out before it hit the market and look forward to spending more time with it now that it’s finally out.

The game can only be downloaded online at peoplepowergame.com and is reasonably priced at $10.

And if you can’t afford that price and would like the game for educational purposes, you can contact the company and get a copy for free. Currently it’s only available in English, but it’ll soon be available in Arabic, Farsi, Russian and Spanish.
____________________
http://www.voanews.com/english/news/arts-and-entertainment/How-to-Remove-a-Dictator-117614514.html

March 08, 2011
How to Remove a Dictator
Deborah Block | Washington


Popular social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, were instrumental in organizing the non-violent protests that led to the resignation last month of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.   Some people in Egypt and other parts of the world have also been using other media for ideas on how to remove a dictator.  This includes watching TV documentaries on civil disobedience created by a private video company in Washington.  The company has also produced video games on ways to use non-violent tactics to enact change.  

The York-Zimmerman TV and film company in Washington has produced several documentaries on civil disobedience.  Filmmaker Steve York says they have been shown around the world and translated into a number of languages, including Arabic.

"People were using these films as training devices in their own non-violent movements, in their struggles against dictators, or authoritarian or oppressive regimes," he said.

York says one of the most popular films is one called "Bringing Down a Dictator."  It documents the non-violent strategies used against former Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosevic, who resigned after disputed election results in 2000.  He was later arrested and tried for war crimes in The Hague, but died before the proceedings finished.  

Ivan Marovic, who is in York’s film, was a leader in OTPOR, the primary non-violent movement against Milosevic.  He was a university student who organized demonstrations.

York-Zimmerman hired Marovic to help create video games - that show non-violent strategies to help remove oppressive governments.  The second, and most recent game is "People Power - The Game of Civil Resistance."  It contains fictional scenarios in which the leader of a non-violent movement uses tactics such as street protests, strikes and boycotts.  Speaking from Belgrade, Serbia, Marovic said people who play the game are likely to be young and educated.  

"The game allows you to see all the complexities of a political struggle, and to kind of focus on all the nuances, and all the details that are necessary, in order to make the right move," he said.

York says the video games are the first of their kind.  

"It became apparent to us, that people who are engaged in non-violent struggles in places in many countries around the world, simply didn’t have materials that would help them learn the techniques," he said.

Jack Duvall, president of the International Center on Non-Violent Conflict in Washington, says the game is also being used in universities.

"Hundreds of political scientists, sociologists, and others at the undergraduate and graduate level have actually embedded the use of these games in their normal curriculum," he said.

The "People Power" video game can only be downloaded from the internet.  It costs $10, but York says people can get it for free if they cannot afford to pay for it.  He says it has been downloaded in many places.

"Latin America, Eastern Europe, parts of Asia, certainly Africa and the Middle East," he said.

"People Power" is currently available only in English.  But York says it will soon also be available in Arabic, Farsi, Russian and Spanish.


Offline Effie Trinket

  • member
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,293
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #11 on: October 06, 2011, 10:51:07 AM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otpor!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Otpor! Logo

Otpor! (Serbian Cyrillic: Отпор!, English: Resistance!) was a non-partisan civic youth movement in Serbia that employed nonviolent struggle as their course of action. They were credited for their role in the successful overthrow of Slobodan Milošević in October 2000.

Origins

Otpor was formed on October 10, 1998 in response to repressive university and media laws introduced earlier that year by the Government of Serbia headed by Milošević loyalist Mirko Marjanović. In the beginning, Otpor's activities were limited to the University of Belgrade.

In the aftermath of the NATO air-strikes against FR Yugoslavia in 1999 regarding the Kosovo War, Otpor began a political campaign against the Yugoslav president Slobodan Milošević. This resulted in nationwide police repression against Otpor activists, during which nearly 2000 were arrested, some beaten. During the presidential campaign of September 2000, Otpor launched its "Gotov je" (He's Finished!) and the "Vreme Je!" (It's Time!) campaigns, which would galvanize national discontent with Milošević and eventually result in his defeat. Some students who led Otpor used Serbian translations of Gene Sharp's writings on nonviolent action as a theoretical basis for their campaigns.

Otpor became one of the defining symbols of the anti-Milošević struggle and his subsequent overthrow. By aiming their activities at the pool of youth abstainers and other disillusioned voters, Otpor contributed to one of the biggest turnouts ever for the September 24, 2000 federal presidential elections.

Persuading a large number of the traditional electorate to abandon Milošević was another one of the areas where the smear-proof Otpor played a key role. Milošević had in the past succeeded in persuading the public that his political opponents were traitors working for foreign interests, but in the case of Otpor!, the tactic largely backfired, as the beatings and imprisonments during the summer of 2000 only further cemented the decision to vote against the regime in many voters' minds.

Post-Milošević

In the immediate months following 5th October Overthrow, Otpor! members were suddenly the widely praised heroes throughout FR Yugoslavia as well as in the eyes of western governments. The clenched fist logo became the instant seal of approval, appearing just about everywhere. From the wide range of local celebrities and public figures seeking positive attention by wearing Otpor! T-shirts, to Partizan basketball club painting the Otpor! logo in the center circle for their FIBA Suproleague game, the clenched fist was omnipresent. This wide-spread popularity inspired some truly bizarre episodes of opportunism as even some individuals tied to the former regime sought to now ingratiate themselves with new DOS authorities by praising Otpor! and its activities.

In the midst of all the praise, the movement promised to keep on, with corruption monitoring becoming the new focus. Several new anti-corruption campaigns were started (Samo vas gledamo, Bez anestezije, etc.), but it was clear that Otpor! experienced problems staying relevant on the transformed political scene of Yugoslavia.

The first signs of backlash and criticism appeared when some activists left the movement in pursuit of political, business, and diplomatic careers. Srđa Popović was entered on the DOS ballot for the December 2000 parliamentary elections, and subsequently became a MP for the Democratic Party within the wide DOS coalition as well as an environmental advisor in the newly inaugurated Serbian government led by Zoran Đinđić.

U.S. involvement

Many activists felt the group's mission was achieved once democracy was established. A smaller Otpor in the post-Milošević years transformed into a political party that faced a challenge formulating a coherent political program. Acting against Milošević earned them wide praise, but when the time came to channel popular support into a clear ideological position, a definite disconnect occurred. In short, it was always clear what Otpor was against, but it was not clear what this movement represented in a new political era. This was not helped by wide media exposure of broad overt US support for democracy in Serbia.

Information started to appear about substantial outside assistance to Otpor leading up to the revolution. Activists made one trip to Budapest in neighbouring Hungary in June 2000 to attend a lecture by retired US Army Col. Robert Helvey, a colleague of Sharp. The movement had already reached its peak when the lecture took place. Otpor was a recipient of substantial funds from U.S. government affiliated organizations such as the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), International Republican Institute (IRI), and US Agency for International Development (USAID).

In a November 2000 article from the New York Times Magazine, Times journalist Roger Cohen talked to various officials from the above organizations about the extent of American assistance received by Otpor. Paul B. McCarthy from the Washington-based NED stated that Otpor received the majority of US$3 million spent by NED in Serbia from September 1998 until October 2000. At the same time, McCarthy himself held a series of meetings with Otpor's leaders in Podgorica, as well as Szeged and Budapest.[1]

Just how much of the US resources appropriated in the year 2000 by USAID, for democracy and governance, which included support to groups that worked to bring an end to the Milošević era through peaceful, democratic means, went to Otpor is not clear. Donald L. Pressley, the assistant administrator at USAID said that several hundred thousand dollars were given to Otpor directly for "demonstration-support material, like T-shirts and stickers".[1] The USIP issued a policy paper that included USIP support to Otpor.[2]

Daniel Calingaert, an official with IRI, said Otpor received some of the US$1.8 million his institute spent in the country throughout 2000. He also said he met Otpor leaders "seven to ten times" in Montenegro (then Yugoslavia), and Hungary, beginning in October 1999.[1] Although the support was in overt democracy programs supported by US taxpayers, all of this did not resonate well with the public in Serbia. It eroded the widely held view of Otpor as a spontaneous, grass-roots people's movement.

Transformation into a political party

In late 2003, ahead of the parliamentary elections, Otpor transformed into a political party, but the writing was by now on the wall. The candidate list of "Otpor—Freedom, Solidarity and Justice" led by Čedomir Čupić did poorly, with only 62,116 votes (1.6% of total vote) in the 2003 Serbian parliamentary election, which left it out of the parliament (census required a minimum of 5%). Otpor merged into the Democratic Party of Boris Tadić in September 2004.

Otpor! leaders on the Serbian political and business scene

Over the subsequent years, influential Otpor! members also rose to prominence within Serbian society in other arenas primarily the country's political and business scene. In the years since Milošević's overthrow, Slobodan Homen and his family were involved in various high profile real-estate business ventures in the city of Belgrade, some of which raised controversy.[3] In 2008 Homen himself became state secretary in the Serbian Ministry of Justice working under cabinet minister Snežana Malović, within the government of prime minister Mirko Cvetković. In March 2011, Homen was named the Serbian government's PR coordinator.[4]

Another Otpor! member Nenad Konstantinović (incidentally Homen's close relative) went on to a notable career within the Democratic Party (DS).

Ivan Andrić joined the Civic Alliance of Serbia (GSS) and later Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) where he became its MP.

Slobodan Đinović became the CEO of Orion Telekom, telecommunications company that was formed through merger of Internet providers Mediaworks, SezamPro, and Neobee.

Lasting legacy

Kmara flag

In addition to greatly contributing to Slobodan Milošević's overthrow, Otpor has become the model for similar youth movements around Eastern Europe.[5] For this Otpor members have been called "revolution exporters". MTV granted Otpor the Free Your Mind award in 2000.

Otpor members were instrumental in inspiring and providing hands-on training to several other civic youth organizations in Eastern Europe and elsewhere, including Kmara[6] in the Republic of Georgia (itself partly responsible for the downfall of Eduard Shevardnadze), Pora in Ukraine[7][8] (which was part of the Orange Revolution), Zubr[6] in Belarus (opposing the president Alexander Lukashenko), MJAFT![9] in Albania, Oborona[10] in Russia (opposing the president Vladimir Putin), KelKel [8] in Kyrgyzstan (active in the revolution that brought down the president Askar Akayev), Bolga in Uzbekistan[11] (opposing Islom Karimov) and Nabad-al-Horriye[12] in Lebanon. A similar group of students was present in Venezuela against Hugo Chávez. In 2011, an April 6 Youth Movement emerged in Egypt during the 2011 Egyptian protests that took advice from Otpor.[13][14][15]

In 2002, some of former Otpor members, most notably Ivan Marovic and Srdja Popovic, founded the Centre for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies (CANVAS). This independent NGO disseminated the lessons learned from their successful nonviolent struggle through scores of trainings and workshops for pro-democracy activists and others around the world, including Egypt, Palestine, Western Sahara, West Papua, Eritrea, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Tonga, Burma and Zimbabwe as well as labor, anti-war, and immigration rights activists in the United States.[16]


April 6 Youth Movement logo

In their search for lessons learned from other activist movements, the April 6 Youth Movement in Egypt consulted with Otpor members and adopted some of their strategies in their rallying for the 2011 Egyptian revolution.[14]

Offline Effie Trinket

  • member
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,293
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #12 on: October 06, 2011, 11:01:34 AM »
http://guerillas-without-guns.blogspot.com/2007/02/otpors-origins.html

Monday, February 19, 2007
OTPOR'S ORIGINS
OTPOR! BITING THE SYSTEM
Adam Larson
Caustic Logic / Guerillas Without Guns
November 2006
re-posted 2/17/07

As the second NATO bombing campaign against Serbia came and went in early-mid 1999, it was the young who led the way out of NATO’s fire and into the West’s frying pan. “Otpor!” is a Serbian word for “Resist” or “Resistance.” It was chosen as a name for a presumably sincere group of dissident students at the University of Belgrade in October 1998. [1] They were reportedly incensed at Milosevic’s repressive media laws, and immediately launched a graffiti campaign across downtown Belgrade, leaving images of their name and their clenched-fist symbol. An early Otpor early website reportedly explained “the fist itself is conceived as the symbol of individual initiative, that the time and energy of every single person should be invested to bring about change. This symbol of personal courage was born with the first public manifestation of RESISTANCE, a leaflet called "Bite the System." [2]

As NATO air strikes poured over their territory and people rallied around the government in early-mid 1999, Otpor’s public activities paused; people refused to rise up in apparent solidarity with the people bombing their country. But in the disastrous aftermath of the bombings, late 1999 and into 2000, the students resumed, taking bigger bites further beyond the campus. Otpor took root in the south and the rural areas; there were eventually more than eighty branches of the movement, with each branch representing a Serbian city. [3]


In Belgrade, an Otpor-led street campaign against Milosevic targeted the minds of the capital’s electorate. They drew on existing American mental technologies, seeking to brand their name and message into the brains of Serbia. Ivan Marovic, a leader of the Otpor movement explained “our idea was to use corporate branding in politics. The movement has to have a marketing department. We took Coca-Cola as our model.” [4] Marovic also described to a BBC Malaysia reporter the techniques used in their campaign, involving creativity, humor, and an uncommon application of strategic psychology:

“In the first phase, we used symbolic street actions. Small number of people would organize the action, which would symbolize the problems they were facing in their own towns. These actions were not something that were too dangerous, so people could easily join and by doing that they could show that they were not satisfied with the situation in the country. With these actions that had a dosage of humour and laugher we managed to break away fear which was the main problem facing [them] under Milosevic’s dictatorship.[5]

In early May the political front shaped up with the emergence of a unified Opposition coalition; eighteen political parties merged into the Democratic Opposition of Serbia (DOS). By this time, Otpor itself was ready to challenge the President directly; in the two years since the group’s inception, it had grown to at least 70,000 members, a force to be reckoned with. The police fought back, but no matter what the authorities did, the movement just got bigger. Thousands of young protesters were arrested. Perhaps hundreds were beaten and interrogated, but the movement’s leadership proved tough to ferret out; Otpor prided itself on the fact that the group had no single leader or hierarchical structure, which rendered ordinary suppression nearly impossible.

Radio Free Europe reported that “Otpor is a state of mind rather than an organization,” a contention backed up by Nis Deputy Mayor Toplica Djordjevic, a Milosevic foe, who told RFE/RL “how many people are in Otpor in Nis I cannot say. But how strong are they as an idea, as a movement -- that is easy to say. Otpor is everywhere. Otpor is an idea that young people embrace and struggle for with full force and full legitimacy.” [7]



The Otpor logo and its advertisement by activists in Belgrade, 2000. Ivan Marovic: “We took Coca-Cola as our model.”

On May 13 a Socialist Party ally of Milosevic, Bosko Perosevic, was gunned down in Novi Sad. The assassin was quickly arrested and accused of membership in Otpor and the SPO opposition party, based on literature found in his apartment. Otpor claimed the evidence was planted, and responded shrewdly that same day with a “surrender action,” handing their membership lists over to the authorities – and to the media. They were apparently banking on the PR move as a sign of innocence, but the government accelerated its repression and arrested many of the activists on the lists anyway, calling them “fascists” and “terrorists.” [8]

Once the youth movement went public, it was no longer a matter of ferreting them out – everybody knew who Otpor were and they were all so cute and brave. Opposition activist Slobodan Vuksanovic touted the movement’s appeal is Serbia as “young people who certainly are not trusted for their experience. They cannot be experienced. Rather, they are trusted because they are clean.” [9] Srdja Popovic, the 27 year-old self-described “ideological commissar” of Otpor, explained that their nonviolent methods had been designed “to show how superior, how advanced, how civilized” they were, and the approach worked quite well. [10] Ordinary citizens, realizing their own children were members, gradually came to accept the movement as the inevitable face of the future. Andrew Mueller interviewed “Otpor’s nominal figurehead,” 20-year-old Branko Ilic. Ilic described the group’s role in the success, describing himself and his comrades as “guerrillas without guns.” [11]

On July 17 Milosevic, having pushed through Parliament a constitutional amendment that would allow him two more terms as president, announced early elections scheduled for September 24, perhaps afraid his popularity would fall after that. [13] As the political opposition moved towards greater unity, Otpor focused on securing the upcoming elections for the opposition. Their prime achievement to this end was their 2000 Gotov Je (“He’s Finished”) pre-election campaign. Over two million stickers announcing this belief were placed around Belgrade and elsewhere to mobilize as many disaffected voters to the polls as possible to vote their conscience – this time they weren’t going to let it be stolen.

So the fight moved to a different level; the government issued a statement blaming all unrest on the cross-pressure from NATO-controlled information warfare and the activities of “an internal fifth column.” [14] Milosevic ran a series of ads targeting Otpor as “NATO foot soldiers” and tools of foreign powers; the spots cleverly had the trademark Otpor fist clenched around a wad of American dollars. [15] The public at the time dismissed the campaign as a cynical lie from a desperate ruler, solidifying in their minds that indeed “Gotov Je.”

Sources:
[1],[6] Pozun, Brian. "Planning for an Uncertain Future." Central EuropeReview. February 26 2001. http://www.ce-review.org/01/8/pozun8.html
[2] "Bulgarian paper says CIA is tutoring Serbian group Otpor." From the Bulgarian newspaper The Monitor. Translated by Blagovesta Doncheva. (Posted 9-8-00) http://emperors-clothes.com/news/cialectures.htm
[3] Sell, Louis. Milosevic and the Destruction of Yugoslavia. Page 339.
[4] Traynor, Ian. “Young democracy guerrillas join forces: From Belgrade to Baku, activists gather to swap notes on how to topple dictators.” The Guardian. June 6 2005. http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1499871,00.html
[5] Htet, U Min. "Serbia: Demise of a Dictator." BBC News. September 16 2005. http://www.bbc.co.uk/burmese/learning/story/2005/09/050912_transition_prog12.shtml
[7] Naegele, Jolyon. “Yugoslavia: Otpor Launches Get Out the Vote Campaign.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. July 18 2000. http://www.rferl.org/features/2000/07/f.ru.000719154500.asp
[8] Human Rights Watch. http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/eca/serbia0601.htm
[9]
[10]

Offline ersatz protocol

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #13 on: October 06, 2011, 05:21:18 PM »
OK...I'd heard nothing about this till today.It just popped up on twitter but it seems most
of the vids were posted in sept, it's about: OCT 15th
I wonder if this was always intended to dovetail with ows on a timeline?
... and is otpor/ivan affiliated with this larger scale event coming up?

http://15october.net/

                 ? 
-----------------------------------------------

United for Global Change

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y3X2VFruLM

The World Awakens to a New Dawn - World Revolution Day 15 Oct 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Plp0vtj4cpc

Global mass protests 15th October 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyziG5bUuBE

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2011, 05:36:53 PM »
OK...I'd heard nothing about this till today.It just popped up on twitter but it seems most
of the vids were posted in sept, it's about: OCT 15th
I wonder if this was always intended to dovetail with ows on a timeline?
... and is otpor/ivan affiliated with this larger scale event coming up?

http://15october.net/

                 ? 
-----------------------------------------------

United for Global Change

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y3X2VFruLM

The World Awakens to a New Dawn - World Revolution Day 15 Oct 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Plp0vtj4cpc

Global mass protests 15th October 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyziG5bUuBE

holy shit, the fricking GAIA revolution kickoff day is coming. The legit OWS should be warned that this will cause massive infiltration by NWO zombie elite provocateurs. It will attempt to tranform the entire thing into a fake protest like the ones outside bohemian grove that Alex exposed.

RENEW RENEW RENEW

carousel is about to begin
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

worcesteradam

  • Guest
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #15 on: October 06, 2011, 07:01:36 PM »
http://15october.net/48h-global-virtual-assembly/

On the days 8th and 9th of October will take place a global virtual assembly to talk about everything related with the October 15th.

worcesteradam

  • Guest
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #16 on: October 06, 2011, 07:07:52 PM »
is this a new 1968 CIA staged world protest

The Strawberry Statement: Notes of a College Revolutionary
... at the convention, men from Business International Roundtables ... tried to buy up a few radicals. These men are the world's leading industrialists and they convene to decide how our lives are going to go .... They're the left wing of the ruling class ....  They offered to finance our demonstrations in Chicago.  We were also offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move to the left.

Business International Corporation
The company has been identified as cover organization for the Central Intelligence Agency, e.g. see Lobster Magazine, issue 14 in 1987. According to a lengthy article in the New York Times in 1977, the co-founder of the company told the newspaper that "Eldridge Haynes [the other founder] had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_International_Corporation

Offline ersatz protocol

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #17 on: October 06, 2011, 11:17:02 PM »
here's an adbusters interview..and again oct.15th is mentioned as part of a timeline of
protest events already planned...
i wanna find if adbusters and marovic/otpor are ever mentioned as working together.

here's a few excerpts:

"...I think this whole thing will stay fairly amorphous through the next big event on Oct. 6 in Washington.
Then it will gain global momentum on Oct. 15 when the Europeans have their big moment in the sun.
I think the big global catalytic moment may well happen on Nov. 3 or Nov. 4 when the G-20 is meeting in France.

In the month following that these demands of ours will emerge and we may well find millions of people marching around the world."

----------------------------------------------------------

Can you speculate about how these demands will emerge? Do you see leaders or spokespeople emerging? How do you see it playing out as a process?

"The political left has always had problems with this. All my life I’ve been sitting in meetings where loony guys get up and talk,
and eventually very little happens. This is the kind of weight that is dragging the political left down. We don’t seem to have
the clarity of vision that for example the Tea Party has. This may be our undoing again. This whole movement may fizzle out
in a bunch of loony lefty kind of bullshit.

Then again, at the same time, I’ve been in daily touch with dozens and dozens of people in cities all around the world who are
 involved in this. And I have a feeling that because of the Internet and a different kind of mentality that young people have, a
 horizontal way of thinking about things, this movement may not just come up with some really good demands and put incredible
 people pressure on our politicians, but a more beautiful thing may come out of this movement: a new model of democracy, a
 new model of how activism can work, of how the people can have a radical democracy and have some of their demands met.
 This new model may well be a new kind of a horizontal thing that in some strange way works like the Internet works."


http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/04/adbusters_occupy_wall_st/singleton/



Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: ***BREAKING: OTPOR/CIA/MAROVIC connection to Occupy Wall Street scams
« Reply #18 on: October 07, 2011, 12:43:58 AM »
here's an adbusters interview..and again oct.15th is mentioned as part of a timeline of
protest events already planned...
i wanna find if adbusters and marovic/otpor are ever mentioned as working together.

here's a few excerpts:

"...I think this whole thing will stay fairly amorphous through the next big event on Oct. 6 in Washington.
Then it will gain global momentum on Oct. 15 when the Europeans have their big moment in the sun.
I think the big global catalytic moment may well happen on Nov. 3 or Nov. 4 when the G-20 is meeting in France.

In the month following that these demands of ours will emerge and we may well find millions of people marching around the world."

----------------------------------------------------------

Can you speculate about how these demands will emerge? Do you see leaders or spokespeople emerging? How do you see it playing out as a process?

"The political left has always had problems with this. All my life I’ve been sitting in meetings where loony guys get up and talk,
and eventually very little happens. This is the kind of weight that is dragging the political left down. We don’t seem to have
the clarity of vision that for example the Tea Party has. This may be our undoing again. This whole movement may fizzle out
in a bunch of loony lefty kind of bullshit.

Then again, at the same time, I’ve been in daily touch with dozens and dozens of people in cities all around the world who are
 involved in this. And I have a feeling that because of the Internet and a different kind of mentality that young people have, a
 horizontal way of thinking about things, this movement may not just come up with some really good demands and put incredible
 people pressure on our politicians, but a more beautiful thing may come out of this movement: a new model of democracy, a
 new model of how activism can work, of how the people can have a radical democracy and have some of their demands met.
 This new model may well be a new kind of a horizontal thing that in some strange way works like the Internet works."


http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/04/adbusters_occupy_wall_st/singleton/

ALERT: OccupyWallStreet's foundation and direction is CYBERNETIC DYSTOPIA
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=219010.0
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Al Bundy

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,531