The whole "Seal team 6 shot down" thing doesn't sit right with military men

[Khaose81]

[Original Title: I don't know if this has been brought up yet...]I work in the military, the airwing to be more specific.  And the whole "Seal team 6 shot down" thing doesn't sit right with me.  First the story that was released at my unit was they where taken down by a mortar.  Ive dealt with mortar attacks before,  there a "walk in" weapon for ground targets.  The chances of hitting a moving aircraft, which I believe was a chinook or some other form of CH-47 variant would be exceedingly difficult.  Later I read on-line that it was a manpads rocket that took it down.  The later is more possible, however, there are several defences against this type of assault. Most manpads are thermal, theres an ALQ infrared system that defends them as well as the chaff and flare systems.  THEY DO WORK!  So the "bomb" idea that has been going around is gathering some weight.  Its not hard for OPS to run out a "package" to the aircraft just before launch.  Happens all the time.  These arcraft have been around a while and have stood the test of time and there history is replete with battle tempering.  You don't just Knock one out of the sky all willy-nilly like.  Research the aircraft.  More importantly, Research the statistics of aviation during this war (police action) and you'll see that more often than not, WE are taking out are own aircraft, not the Iraqis/Afghans.

[jerryweaver]

Makes sense to me. If it's an inside job thats usually how it gets done. The perps would want it done for sure. A screw up would really be really be bad news. How many political assassinations by plane don't get done with bomb s on board?
 

[decemberfellow]

Very interesting quote and quite a good chance that it was an inside job that bought it down.  Only way to shut everyone up.

[Constitutionary]

Obama was being railed on his phony Birth Certificate.

So the Globalist media machine needed another wag-the-dog operation to distract America from it.

Killing Bin-Laden was the script.  Even tho Bid Laden was dead back in 2002 from Kidney failure.

CNN: Bin Laden is dead from kidney disease
http://articles.cnn.com/2002-01-18/world/gen.musharraf.binladen_1_bin-mullah-mohammed-omar-pakistan-s-musharraf
January 18, 2002

Pakistan's president says he thinks Osama bin Laden is most likely dead because the suspected terrorist has been unable to get treatment for his kidney disease.

"I think now, frankly, he is dead for the reason he is a ... kidney patient," Gen. Pervez Musharraf said on Friday in an interview with CNN.

Musharraf said Pakistan knew bin Laden took two dialysis machines into Afghanistan. "One was specifically for his own personal use," he said.
 
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=207561.0;topicseen

[Khaose81]

I really love how the globalist think that the people who are good at spotting certain details don't talk to one another.  I can't imagine why they despise the internet so much.