Wasn't The PATRIOT Act Supposed To Be About Stopping Terrorism?

[Jordan]

The PATRIOT Act was all about stopping terrorism, right? We were told that special provisions that ate away at our civil liberties were needed specifically to catch dangerous terrorists -- and that the reason for such an abdication of our rights had nothing to do with simply giving the government more useful surveillance powers. Aaron DeOliveira points us to a fascinating chart that shows how often law enforcement has been using "sneak-and-peek" warrants. These warrants let officials search private property without letting the target of the investigation know. Again, we were told that these expanded powers were needed to stop terrorism. So what have they been used for? Take a look:


Yup. They're all pretty much being used in drug cases. Now some might make the argument that it's important to go after drug dealers -- but that's not how the PATRIOT Act was supposed to be used.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110908/02534215846/wasnt-patriot-act-supposed-to-be-about-stopping-terrorism.shtml

[Jordan]

Welcome to America, where we keep labor costs low by enslaving people and forcing them to work in prisons.

[9/11-insider trading]

Its like G. Bush saying if you buy a dime you support al qaeda.

When it comes to Afghanistan "opium is not the problem"

9/11 was just the next phase of the drug war. (although 9/11 served many agendas)

[Valerius]

And check this out, from the great Libyan debacle:

"Looters Steal Gadhafi's weapons, including surface-to-air missiles"

© Content Copyright 2011 WLS Radio 890AM and WLSAM.com

http://www.wlsam.com/Article.asp?id=2281782&spid=