What Does "Pull It" Mean?

[NJTRT]

I just put together this sweet semi-music video that shows Larry Silverstein’s pull it quote followed by a call to a demolition company the confirms that the term means to bring the building down.

Please give this video some love by giving it a thumbs up and adding it to your favorites! 

FEEDBACK IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZsQxy8XhnM

[Constitutionary]

WTC-7 was an engineered collapse.

[MonkeyPuppet]

Lose the rap (or hip-hop, whatever) and the reverb effects.  Not only does the music and effects make the audio less discernible (and usable by other filmmakers), but I'd imagine delivering just the facts would be more useful in the infowar than trying to make it entertaining.  Providing visual corroboration wouldn't hurt either... company name, where you got the number, etc.

Anyone can fake a phone call... just ask the Pentagon.

Just my 2cents.

[Geolibertarian]

There's a PBS video of a demolition team saying "we're gettin' ready to pull Building 6" just before bringing down the remains of that building with explosives.

How anyone can watch that and still pretend not to know what "pull it" means in the context of a building collapsing into its own footprint is beyond me.

[decemberfellow]

There's a PBS video of a demolition team saying "we're gettin' ready to pull Building 6" just before bringing down the remains of that building with explosives.

How anyone can watch that and still pretend not to know what "pull it" means in the context of a building collapsing into its own footprint is beyond me.

BUMP

[NJTRT]

Lose the rap (or hip-hop, whatever) and the reverb effects.  Not only does the music and effects make the audio less discernible (and usable by other filmmakers), but I'd imagine delivering just the facts would be more useful in the infowar than trying to make it entertaining.  Providing visual corroboration wouldn't hurt either... company name, where you got the number, etc.

Anyone can fake a phone call... just ask the Pentagon.

Just my 2cents.

I can understand that.  The issue is that I lifted the audio from Payday Monsanto's first album.  I believe the phone call is credible though.

I disagree on not trying to be entertaining.  I think it is more than necessary.  I am not trying to reach people like you.  I do not want to preach to the quire.  By making it entertaining I am attempting to grab the short attention span of the general TV head populous.

Thanks for the feedback!

[pjcz]

This is a post I made on 911 Blogger on this topic in October of last year:

****
So, I was visiting the website 911research.wtc7.net the other day and I saw there a whole page (http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/pullit.html) devoted to Larry Silverstein and his alleged admission about the controlled demolition of WTC 7. This, of course, was dealing with his now famous quote during the PBS documentary entitled "America Rebuilds," which aired on September 10, 2002. The quote again:

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

At the bottom of this page, 911research.wtc7.net has a heading/section called "A Closer Look" in which the writers say:

"Although many people are convinced that Silverstein's statement is an admission that he and the fire department commander conspired to demolish the building, the statement fails to support a case for such a crime. The common assertion that "pull" is industry slang for demolition lacks support. A Google search for the term "pull" in relation to controlled demolition fails to return uses of "pull" meaning demolition outside of the widely circulated story of Silverstein's admission on 9/11 conspiracy sites."

Well, I did some very basic Google searching and on the website for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (http://www.controlled-demolition.com/) I found evidence that DOES link the terms "pull" and "pulled" to controlled, explosive demolition.

At this link (http://www.controlled-demolition.com/article/everglades-forever-gone) the company describes:

"Utilizing a total of 137 pounds of linear shaped charges and 50 lbs of dynamite “kicker charges”, CDI worked in only the partial basement to the west, the Lobby Level and 4th floor of the structure. Placed in over 400 locations, the shaped charges were sequentially initiated over a period of 5.4 seconds, working from southwest to northeast through the structure. Following the seemingly endless 2.6 second natural pause in the non-electric initiation system, the structural charges detonated on cue, allowing the southwest wing of the structure to fail first, creating the desired lateral “pull” on the north and east curtain walls."

At this link (http://www.controlled-demolition.com/sears-catalog-warehouse) the company describes:

"Approximately 2,700 lb. of explosives were placed in 2,918 holes on six levels of the structure. CDI’s delayed detonation of charges, the product of 50 years of explosives demolition experience, pulled the massive warehouse structure away from a U.S. Post Office facility only 18 -ft away without damage."

Also, here is a PBS/Nova interview of Stacey Loizeaux, who at the time was 26 years old and had worked for Controlled Demolition, Inc. since the age of 15.
 Link: (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/kaboom/loizeaux.html)

Quote:
 "NOVA: A common misconception is that you blow buildings up. That's not really the case, is it?

Stacy Loizeaux: No. The term "implosion" was coined by my grandmother back in, I guess, the '60s. It's a more descriptive way to explain what we do than "explosion." There are a series of small explosions, but the building itself isn't erupting outward. It's actually being pulled in on top of itself. What we're really doing is removing specific support columns within the structure and then cajoling the building in one direction or another, or straight down."

At this link: (http://o.seattlepi.com/kingdome/main.shtml) Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition Inc., says this of the Seattle Kingdome demolition back in 2000:

"The roof did its job, the gravity engine worked. It provided the energy we needed to pull the columns inward."

There are just four examples... I bet I could find more.

Now, I am not saying that Silverstein was actually admitting anything, but a simple Google search seems to find more support for "pull" or "pulled" being linked to controlled demolitions with explosives than the 911research.wtc7.net site suggests.
*****

[JT Coyoté]

I just put together this sweet semi-music video that shows Larry Silverstein’s pull it quote followed by a call to a demolition company the confirms that the term means to bring the building down.

Please give this video some love by giving it a thumbs up and adding it to your favorites!  

FEEDBACK IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZsQxy8XhnM

Good Work.

I will be sending it to my younger friends to spread around... whoa... that's just about everyone I know..... younger I mean... Well, I'll qualify that by saying my "under 30" friends.

I agree with trying to get the demo company's name... the only problem is that most companies like most individuals are scared of the "usurper" government and their "mob-esque" reprisals, when anything is said against them...

Oldyoti

"As usurpation is the exercise of power, which another hath
a right to; so tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right,
which nobody can have a right to."
~John Locke, "Of Civil Government" 1689

[NJTRT]

This is a post I made on 911 Blogger on this topic in October of last year:

****
So, I was visiting the website 911research.wtc7.net the other day and I saw there a whole page (http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/pullit.html) devoted to Larry Silverstein and his alleged admission about the controlled demolition of WTC 7. This, of course, was dealing with his now famous quote during the PBS documentary entitled "America Rebuilds," which aired on September 10, 2002. The quote again:

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

At the bottom of this page, 911research.wtc7.net has a heading/section called "A Closer Look" in which the writers say:

"Although many people are convinced that Silverstein's statement is an admission that he and the fire department commander conspired to demolish the building, the statement fails to support a case for such a crime. The common assertion that "pull" is industry slang for demolition lacks support. A Google search for the term "pull" in relation to controlled demolition fails to return uses of "pull" meaning demolition outside of the widely circulated story of Silverstein's admission on 9/11 conspiracy sites."

Well, I did some very basic Google searching and on the website for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (http://www.controlled-demolition.com/) I found evidence that DOES link the terms "pull" and "pulled" to controlled, explosive demolition.

At this link (http://www.controlled-demolition.com/article/everglades-forever-gone) the company describes:

"Utilizing a total of 137 pounds of linear shaped charges and 50 lbs of dynamite “kicker charges”, CDI worked in only the partial basement to the west, the Lobby Level and 4th floor of the structure. Placed in over 400 locations, the shaped charges were sequentially initiated over a period of 5.4 seconds, working from southwest to northeast through the structure. Following the seemingly endless 2.6 second natural pause in the non-electric initiation system, the structural charges detonated on cue, allowing the southwest wing of the structure to fail first, creating the desired lateral “pull” on the north and east curtain walls."

At this link (http://www.controlled-demolition.com/sears-catalog-warehouse) the company describes:

"Approximately 2,700 lb. of explosives were placed in 2,918 holes on six levels of the structure. CDI’s delayed detonation of charges, the product of 50 years of explosives demolition experience, pulled the massive warehouse structure away from a U.S. Post Office facility only 18 -ft away without damage."

Also, here is a PBS/Nova interview of Stacey Loizeaux, who at the time was 26 years old and had worked for Controlled Demolition, Inc. since the age of 15.
 Link: (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/kaboom/loizeaux.html)

Quote:
 "NOVA: A common misconception is that you blow buildings up. That's not really the case, is it?

Stacy Loizeaux: No. The term "implosion" was coined by my grandmother back in, I guess, the '60s. It's a more descriptive way to explain what we do than "explosion." There are a series of small explosions, but the building itself isn't erupting outward. It's actually being pulled in on top of itself. What we're really doing is removing specific support columns within the structure and then cajoling the building in one direction or another, or straight down."

At this link: (http://o.seattlepi.com/kingdome/main.shtml) Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition Inc., says this of the Seattle Kingdome demolition back in 2000:

"The roof did its job, the gravity engine worked. It provided the energy we needed to pull the columns inward."

There are just four examples... I bet I could find more.

Now, I am not saying that Silverstein was actually admitting anything, but a simple Google search seems to find more support for "pull" or "pulled" being linked to controlled demolitions with explosives than the 911research.wtc7.net site suggests.
*****

Right, and the general excuse is that he meant pull the firefighters out, however they were all out of the building HOURS before the collapse! -- http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein_pullit.html

[worcesteradam]

pull it means freedom

[Geolibertarian]

Right, and the general excuse is that he meant pull the firefighters out, however they were all out of the building HOURS before the collapse! -- http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein_pullit.html

And then there's the video of the demolition team saying there were about to "pull Buidling Six" just before it collapsed into its own footprint that official story-worshipping coincidence theorists always ignore.

[worcesteradam]

According to Chapter 5 of FEMA's Building Performance Study , firefighters were never in the building: "Preliminary indications were that, due to lack of water, no manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY."
-------------
Joe Webber was in a staff meeting that morning, on the seventh floor at Six World Trade Center, when the first plane hit (08:46 AM).
He ordered everybody to reassemble at Seven World Trade – at the emergency command post that the City of New York maintained there –
By the time he arrived at Seven World Trade, there was debris and panic and confusion raining down all over the block. The doors to the command post were locked. They couldn’t get in. That’s when the second plane hit. (09:03 AM).
-------------
Jerry Hauer says the entrance was blocked so the building couldnt be used  -  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uAjJdO7CWw

[Geolibertarian]

According to Chapter 5 of FEMA's Building Performance Study , firefighters were never in the building: "Preliminary indications were that, due to lack of water, no manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY."

It doesn't matter what the admitted facts are. Apologists for the official story are not in the business of telling the truth, but of telling intellectual cowards what they want to hear -- even if it means turning a fundamental law of physics on its head.

[worcesteradam]

Writing for Fox News, Jeffrey Scott Shapiro states:

“I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard.”

“Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.”

“A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy,” writes Shapiro.

[Geolibertarian]

Writing for Fox News, Jeffrey Scott Shapiro states:

“I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard.”

“Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.”

“A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy,” writes Shapiro.

There's only one problem: according to the official story, there was no "controlled demolition" of Building 7. So is Mr. Shapiro saying the official story is a lie? If so, then doesn't that make him a "conspiracy theorist"?

[NJTRT]

And then there's the video of the demolition team saying there were about to "pull Buidling Six" just before it collapsed into its own footprint that official story-worshipping coincidence theorists always ignore.

Coincidence theorists!! I love that!

[SUPREMEMASTER]

The firemen weren't fighting fires inside of building 7.

So by process of elimination this could only mean one thing.

It was controlled demolition.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI&feature=player_detailpage#t=13s

[Geolibertarian]

Coincidence theorists!! I love that!

Then you'll really love this:

     http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2008/12/coincidence-theorists-guide-to-911.html

[NJTRT]

Then you'll really love this:

     http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2008/12/coincidence-theorists-guide-to-911.html

INTERESTING STUFF THANKS!

[NJTRT]

Then you'll really love this:

     http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2008/12/coincidence-theorists-guide-to-911.html

I've never seen such a big box of bullshit!

[Jackson Holly]

^ ^ ^


... it was a slip of the tongue, a Freudian slip they call it.
All 3 bldgs were wired way in advance ... were allowed
to burn for a while to make the collapses somewhat
believable and then they pulled them. The ROTHSCHILD Media
mis-direction, in a number of minutes created,
the POST 911 WORLD ... and the planet bought it.

BTW ... the magicians in charge of our world are
adept at illusion and mind control ... please watch the
shorts vids on the link in order ...

   
 

    http://www.theinvisiblegorilla.com/videos.html

[Letsbereal]

9/11 Dutch Wistle Blower Building 7 Danny Jowenko http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwCu4nLafiY

Danny Jowenko died in a suspicious car accident on 20 July 2011 at the age of 55.

http://nederlandvrij.com/2011/07/nu-ook-klokkenluider-danny-jowenko-dood/

The Police is not giving much information , but he has been in the car until the end 2 hours later , they said that he was already death,

but it could be that they just let him die...because he was an important Proffesional Support for the 9/11 Truth movement and the Police is in hands of the Elite in power.......but maybe he was really death already.....

But we all know the most of the police are really corrupt.....its hard to say.

VERY RARE 911 PICTURE SLIDESHOW

[jofortruth]

9/11 Dutch Wistle Blower Building 7 Danny Jowenko http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwCu4nLafiY

Danny Jowenko died in a suspicious car accident on 20 July 2011 at the age of 55.

http://nederlandvrij.com/2011/07/nu-ook-klokkenluider-danny-jowenko-dood/

The Police is not giving much information , but he has been in the car until the end 2 hours later , they said that he was already death,

but it could be that they just let him die...because he was an important Proffesional Support for the 9/11 Truth movement and the Police is in hands of the Elite in power.......but maybe he was really death already.....

But we all know the most of the police are really corrupt.....its hard to say.

VERY RARE 911 PICTURE SLIDESHOW

ENGLISH TRANSLATION: Breaking:  Just is it news in come that famous bell-ringers Danny Jowenko round the life is come.  By an one-sided accident to height of business grounds De Zompe by Serooskerke on Walcheren he has been collided with saturday evening with its car against a tree.  This happened around 19:30.  In the car, no other people sat.  Danny became 55 year.  Unfortunately we can report on this moment not yet much more, because the police release want nothing over the facts of the case yet.  

Danny Jowenko became known as the Dutch explosievenexpert that as an of the first doubted the official story of 11 September 2001 and the attack on the Twin Towers.  Its professional opinion has do let get up many others.  This message has been shocked for our sore.  Not only was Danny a real freedoms fighter, was he also yet once an icon for a whole international movement.  Thanks Danny, that you it always dared have to tell the truth.  Your words want never be forgotten.  

http://ets.freetranslation.com/

[kerrymti]

^ ^ ^


... it was a slip of the tongue, a Freudian slip they call it.
All 3 bldgs were wired way in advance ... were allowed
to burn for a while to make the collapses somewhat
believable and then they pulled them. The ROTHSCHILD Media
mis-direction, in a number of minutes created,
the POST 911 WORLD ... and the planet bought it.

BTW ... the magicians in charge of our world are
adept at illusion and mind control ... please watch the
shorts vids on the link in order ...
   
 

    http://www.theinvisiblegorilla.com/videos.html

Oh, that was good!  I have seen vids like this before, so I assumed I would be able to 'see' what they thought you couldn't see...I was wrong, on all but one!
 

[Jackson Holly]

Oh, that was good!  I have seen vids like this before, so I assumed I would be able to 'see' what they thought you couldn't see...I was wrong, on all but one!
 

Yep ... those are good illustrations of exactly what
happened on 911 (and JFK, RFK, MLK, etc). Not only
did they spend years setting up the the 'pulling' of the
buildings, they spent years in the mindf*ck media "coverage"
and the military mis-direction.

With one master magic illusion they set the framework
for at least the next 50 years in human affairs.