Cremation of Care

[southernmissouri2007]

My question is because of our Federal Reserve System is our Nation still ruled by the British ?

http://www.usagold.com/federalreserve.html

[southernmissouri2007]

Is the Cremation of Care really just acting thanks ?

[southernmissouri2007]

http://www.conspiracywatch.net/2011/03/bohemian-grove-conspiracy.html

[southernmissouri2007]

Here is a answer that I got on Yahoo Answers tell me you all agree ?

Most animals in animal farm were representations of actual characters in Soviet Russia. Snowball is Trotsky and Napoleon is Stalin for example.
 
The humans represented the old Czars and the capitalists. Communists criticized the Czars and the Capitalists because they said that wealth in those systems was concentrated. The criticism is that too few people own too much. In other words the monarchs and capitalists at the top have the most money/wealth/resources...The pigs (being communists supposedly) started a revolution to oust the humans (Czar/Capitalists). Ironically the pigs ended up being indistinguishable from the humans (meaning the communists piggies were no different than the people they criticized). The top leaders had all the power/money/wealth/resources while no one else had anything. In the USSR it was the same...They promised change. Stalin and Lenin promised equality, but in the end the communist leaders and elites ended up being no different from the brutal Czar.
 
Snowball is Trotsky (he was exiled to another farm, Trotsky was exiled to Mexico)
 Napoleon is Stalin
 Farmer Jones is the old Czar and/or Capitalists
 Dogs were the military police or KGB
 There is a lot more, but I forgot...I read that book a long time ago.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtfH1TFrj1z2TeX9_HEpAP3sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20110916184435AAxwaBX

[pac522]

http://cremationofcare.com/illu_molech.htm
http://cremationofcare.com/illu_bohemian_grove.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5dHhvpHIjM

[JT Coyoté]

Is the Cremation of Care a play like acting and actors or is it Satanism or is it both Im trying to prove to people that it is not just a play is it Symbolism ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cremation_of_Care

The "Cremation of Care" is a ritual that signifies the sacrificing of care for others into the fires of Moleck, especially, care for the so-called useless eaters and cannon fodder, the working classes.

This ritual contains within it a mystique of participation, promoting a kind of group mind, that makes the participant believe this to be a necessary practice to maintain Earth's population in balance, making it easier for the individual and the group engaging in the ritual to participate in torture, debauchery, and genocide.

Care in this case is symbolized as an baby... a century or so ago, the child would have been real.

Hope this helps.

Oldyoti

"... and at the center of the NWO spider-web,
the Big Black widow, 'robot heart' Cheney..."
~Alex Jones, on the air, 08-15-08

[southernmissouri2007]

Is Molech a Owl or a Bull or can Molech be both ?

[southernmissouri2007]

Also is a ritual different from a play ?

[southernmissouri2007]

What does everyone think ?

[JT Coyoté]

Is Molech a Owl or a Bull or can Molech be both ?

The image can be almost anything (owl bull goat), it will always be ritualized with the energy of human sacrifice behind it however... a ritual is a religious rite that concretizes the energy of the rituals meaning in the mind of the participant, by physical symbology.

another example of a religious rite is Holy Communion, which symbolizes a unification with Christ. The wine and the bread symbolize the body of Christ. By eating and drinking the sacrament, on a physical level, it symbolizes a unification with the idea in the mind.

So to the uninitiated at first glance it would appear as a play of sorts...

JTCoyoté

"People are scared of things they shouldn't be scared of.
Yet they are not scared of things they should be scared of --
the media tells folks what to fear -- so people fear only
what the media TELLS them to be scared of."
~Alex Jones, on the air, 8/18/09

[pac522]

The image can be almost anything (owl bull goat), it will always be ritualized with the energy of human sacrifice behind it however... a ritual is a religious rite that concretizes the energy of the rituals meaning in the mind of the participant, by physical symbology.

another example of a religious rite is Holy Communion, which symbolizes a unification with Christ. The wine and the bread symbolize the body of Christ. By eating and drinking the sacrament, on a physical level, it symbolizes a unification with the idea in the mind.

So to the uninitiated at first glance it would appear as a play of sorts...

JTCoyoté

"People are scared of things they shouldn't be scared of.
Yet they are not scared of things they should be scared of --
the media tells folks what to fear -- so people fear only
what the media TELLS them to be scared of."
~Alex Jones, on the air, 8/18/09

It also synbolizes the male and female energies. It's explained on the Molech link on my above post.

http://cremationofcare.com/illu_molech.htm

[789]

Once upon a time there was a great man representing Missouri in the Senate --Thomas Hart Benton-- he told it like it was (and still is):  the United States had one enemy thoughout its existence, the United Kingdom;  and this enemy defeated the concept of united States for common defence and mutual benefit, for which Thomas Jefferson composed the Declaration.  Mr. Jefferson was also of the opinion that the enemy resided in London.

Please read your history, some times:--
http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/uregina/speeches.html

and the letters of Thomas Jefferson:
http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/jefferson/jefind.html

The reasons for establishing an Independent Treasury are now too apparent to require argument here.  Two suspensions of the banks in three years, shows that they cannot be relied upon by the Federal Government.  Besides, our whole banking system is a dependency of the British system;  its centre is in London;  its masters are there;  and, in addition to its own inherent dangers, great enough, in all conscience, it is also subject to the misfortunes, and to the orders, of the mother system in England.  It must shut up, and blow up, as ordered, or suffered there;  and thus the Federal Government, in keeping its money in our banks, is virtually keeping it in London, subject to the orders of Englishmen, and to the wants, or policy, misfortunes, or crimes, of their own paper system.  Surely it is time to break such a dependence.

H.A. Lincoln and the Whig crew in hot haste got rid of the Independent Treasury, and (re)established everything Alexander Hamilton could dream of:
a strong central government
a permanent national debt
a national currency, based on this national debt
a national (private) banking system issuing this national currency

and, to ice the cake, they gave away 200million acres to robber barons

"No flag alien to the sources of the Mississippi river will ever float over its mouths till its waters are crimsoned with human gore;  and not one foot of American soil can ever be wrenched from the jurisdiction of the Constitution of the United States until it is baptized in fire and blood."
—Galusha A. Grow, Speaker of the House, July 4th, 1861.

To answer your question:  yes, ye are mortgaged to the London oligarchy (the FedRes Act was simply an administrative adjustment)

This was the reasoning of General Hamilton, that eminent and bold man, who was the great founder of the Federal sect.  To nullify express words by construction — to judge a constitutional question by its expediency — to sacrifice gold and silver to paper — marry the Government and the banks together — and to make the former dependent upon the aid of the latter;  this was his conduct and his policy;  and this has been the conduct and policy of the sect which he founded for the fifty years which it has existed.

This was the reasoning of General Hamilton;  this his argument, to show that gold and silver coin only signified bank notes !  Certainly nothing more fallacious —not to say audacious— ever fell from the lips of man.  It was an insult to the understanding, and a contempt for the spirit of those to whom it was addressed.  But it was addressed to a Congress of Federal members;  to a Congress in which the Democracy had no weight, and the majority of which immediately proceeded to chain the whole Federal Government to the British paper system, by chartering a National Bank with British stockholders, funding the soldiers' certificates, assuming State debts, and creating a stockjobbing interest to feed and fatten upon the credit and revenues of the Union — to rule its politics, and to consider the administration of the Government as wholly subordinate to their own schemes of wealth and aggrandisement.  This was the Congress to which General Hamilton made his report, and which received it with the submission and acquiescence which might be expected from such a body.  They shut their eyes upon the mockery which was made of the law, and they submitted to the insult to which the excuse implied to themselves.

Something to ponder:
Benedict Arnold was a feudalist.  If Mr. Washington had treated Mr. Arnold impartially and had given him the deserved promotion, Benedict would have become a founding father !!

Why was it that Mr. Cornwallis --a Whig-- did everything he could NOT to defeat Washington and the insurgents ?

[Freeski]

The criticism is that too few people own too much.

Hardly anyone could disagree, but say our solution was to realign wealth distribution to make it equal, doesn't that put us in charge of other people's affairs? What authority do we have to compel any human being to do anything?

Just by participating in "the system, we are trying to control others. Maybe we don't need "a system" at all?

[southernmissouri2007]

Has anyone here read this Book ? I am not anti Semitic or anti Jewish or anti Judaism I think Judaism is a beautiful Religion and Faith but I am anti Zionist and Anti the American Government's support/aid to and of Israel and the control of the U.S. Congress by the Israel Lobby does anyone here agree ?

The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy [Hardcover]


John J. Mearsheimer 
John J. Mearsheimer (Author)
› Visit Amazon's John J. Mearsheimer Page
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author? Learn about Author Central
(Author), Stephen M. Walt 
Stephen M. Walt (Author)
› Visit Amazon's Stephen M. Walt Page
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author? Learn about Author Central
(Author)

http://www.amazon.com/Israel-Lobby-U-S-Foreign-Policy/dp/0374177724

[southernmissouri2007]

Does anyone have any opinion thanks ?

[southernmissouri2007]

Why the Economy Grows Like Crazy Amid High Taxes
 The raw truth is that the economy has grown faster when taxes were higher, but how can we explain that phenomenon?
November 17, 2008 | LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
 Join our mailing list:
 Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
 TAKE ACTIONChange.org|Get Widget|Start an Online Petition � The real-world effects of tax policy are counterintuitive.

 Why do high taxes create a stronger economy?

 I used to run a small business -- a commercial film production company.

 Every time we took a dollar out as personal income, it instantly turned into 50 cents.

 If we didn't really need the money, that was an incentive to keep it in the company and to find ways to spend it that took it out of the taxable profit column but increased the value of the company.

 High taxes create an incentive to reinvest profits into long-term growth.

 With high taxes, the only way to retain the bulk of the wealth created by a business is by reinvesting it in the business -- in plants, equipment, staff, research and development, new products and all the rest.

 http://www.alternet.org/economy/106979/

 Can anyone debunk or refute this claim that higher taxes will mean that the Rich will keep their money inside their businesses and create Jobs to avoid higher Taxes is this wrong because the Rich business owners will have less money to create Jobs ?

[Satyagraha]

It's a scrupulously detailed look at the Zionist's lobby.
The authors needed Kevlar suits to deal with the rabid zionists' response.
Read it and understand how powerful this lobby has become in influencing our elected representatives in congress.

 ======================

http://www.amazon.com/Israel-Lobby-U-S-Foreign-Policy/dp/B004J8HWVY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1316373028&sr=8-1
Starred Review. Expanding on their notorious 2006 article in the London Review of Books, the authors increase the megatonnage of their explosive claims about the malign influence of the pro-Israel lobby on the U.S. government.

Mearsheimer and Walt, political scientists at the University of Chicago and Harvard, respectively, survey a wide coalition of pro-Israel groups and individuals, including American Jewish organizations and political donors, Christian fundamentalists, neo-con officials in the executive branch, media pundits who smear critics of Israel as anti-Semites and the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, which they characterize as having an almost unchallenged hold on Congress.

This lobby, they contend, has pressured the U.S. government into Middle East policies that are strategically and morally unjustifiable: lavish financial subsidies for Israel despite its occupation of Palestinian territories; needless American confrontations with Israel's foes Syria and Iran; uncritical support of Israel's 2006 bombing of Lebanon, which violated the laws of war; and the Iraq war, which almost certainly would not have occurred had [the Israel lobby] been absent.

The authors disavow conspiracy mongering, noting that the lobby's activities constitute legitimate, if misguided, interest-group politics, as American as apple pie. Considering the authors' academic credentials and the careful reasoning and meticulous documentation with which they support their claims, the book is bound to rekindle the controversy. (Sept.)

========================

Speechless in Chicago
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2007/08/07/speechless-in-chicago/
August 7, 2007, 6:33 PM ET
Jay Solomon reports on controversy over a planned speech.

The Chicago Council on Global Affairs has canceled a September speech on U.S.-Israel relations and Washington’s pro-Israel lobby by two prominent U.S. political scientists.

John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt were scheduled to use the Sept. 27 address to outline their upcoming book, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, which is expected to be released by Farrar, Straus & Giroux early next month. But the president of the Chicago Council, Marshall Bouton, canceled the event under pressure from critics who were uncomfortable with the academics’ arguments, according to a letter drafted by Mearsheimer and Walt to the Council’s board.

These opponents of the event argued that the two political scientists could only address the Chicago Council if someone from the opposing side, such as Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League, concurrently appeared on stage with the authors.

One might argue that our views are too controversial to be presented on their own, Mearsheimer and Walt wrote. However, they are seen as controversial only because some of the groups and individuals that we criticized in our original article have misrepresented what we said.

Mearsheimer, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, and Walt, on the faculty at Harvard, set off a political firestorm last year when they penned an article for the London Review of Books, called the Israel Lobby, that argued pro-Israel interest groups had distorted U.S. policies in the Middle East. They also argued that these groups played a central role in promoting the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq.

Since the original article appeared in March 2006, the two academics have appeared at a number of ventures to explain their views, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the National Press Club and Georgetown University. But a number of leading Jewish-American organizations, such as the ADF and the American Jewish Congress, have consistently charged that Mearsheimer’s and Walt’s views are anti-Semitic and overemphasize the power of the pro-Israel lobby.

Mearsheimer and Walt deny being anti-Semites and said the charges are designed to discourage respected organizations like the Council from giving us an audience.”

=======================

The tactics of people like Abe Foxman at the ADL, are to use the claim of "Anti-semitism" against anyone who criticizes the policies of the Israeli government, and AIPAC. If you criticize them and you're not Jewish, then you're an "Anti-semite". If you criticize them and you ARE Jewish, you are called a "self-hating Jew".  They've got every angle covered; and their weapon is to smear their critics.

[Brocke]

The Israel Lobby (Marije Meerman, VPRO Backlight 2007) Dutch with English Subtitles

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N294FMDok98



For many years now the American foreign policy has been characterized by the strong tie between the United States and Israel. Does the United States in fact keep Israel on its feet? And how long will it continue to do so? In March 2006 the American political scientists John Mearsheimer (University of Chicago) and Steve Walt (Harvard) published the controversial article 'The Israel Lobby and US foreign policy'. In it they state that it is not, or no longer, expedient for the US to support and protect present-day Israel. The documentary sheds light on both parties involved in the discussion: those who wish to maintain the strong tie between the US and Israel, and those who were critical of it and not infrequently became 'victims' of the lobby. The question arises to what extend the pro-Israel lobby ultimately determines the military and political importance of Israel itself. Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson (Colin Powell's former chief-of-staff) explains how the lobby's influence affects the decision-making structure in the White House.
With political scientist John Mearsheimer, neocon Richard Perle, lobby organization AIPAC, televangelist John Hagee, historian Tony Judt, Human Rights Watch director Kenneth Roth, colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, Democrat Earl Hilliard, Israeli peace negotiator Daniel Levy and investigative journalist Michael Massing.

[Satyagraha]

Great video - thanks Brocke.

[donnay]

George Orwell - Animal Farm (ENGLISH Part 1/8)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bd4UJwldQ0

[Freeski]

A state of liberty can, should and would involve systems, but only voluntary systems -- however individuals see fit.

When I refer to The System, I'm referring to the notion of a top-down planned, managed and controlled economy and social structure. Such a beast is immoral at its core, and if that's not enough, it simply cannot exist without widespread corruption.

[Jordan]

It's a parable explaining the russian revolution. Orwell made the point that we're all equal but some are more equal then others. It dealt with solutions.The obvious solution is to steal from the rich and give it to the poor. That is what they tried in the Animal Farm and it worked well until the vanguard party became corrupted. Notice how, in animal farm, the animals did all the work and the farmer enjoyed all the profits?  

So in reality it seems the issue isn't stealing (back) from the rich to give (back) to the poor, but managing corruption and preventing career bureaucratism like we have now.

Interestingly enough, the government is completely out of touch with reality, lost, financially and morally bankrupt, but people view it as the sole contributor to society.

Humans are broken and cant be fixed.

[southernmissouri2007]

Can it be proven that Bin Laden was CIA and got funding from the CIA my question is there evidence for Bin Laden being a CIA agent ?

[southernmissouri2007]

How the CIA created Osama bin Laden
 
Wednesday, September 19, 2001
 
BY NORM DIXON

http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/24198

[Kilika]

That's been discussed here many times. Others here are more versed on the topic though, but I think there is plenty of evidence right here in this forum.

[feeditup]

would it really matter if he was CIA or not when the towers had bombs in them and it wasn't just air planes ? jet fuel wont melt steel and iron and remain at 1600 degrees weeks later.

[southernmissouri2007]

Are the Elected Presidents of the United States of America just Puppets of the New World Order Elites or are they members of the New World Order how do we know I have heard Alex Jones say that the Presidents are just Puppets ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppet

[Charlie Prime]

Can it be proven that Bin Laden was CIA

Examine this evidence...  http://www.alqaedadoesntexist.com

Then go find contrary evidence.

Compare the two.

Decide for yourself.

[southernmissouri2007]

Does anyone know thank you ?

[One Revelator]

What’s the difference? Since when has anyone been placed in an overt position of authority without some sort of handlers in the background to assure control over the situation? Who influences the president’s actions/decisions? Certainly not “we the people” anymore. Since 1900, have we the people ever collectively decided to go to war or did we need to be convinced that it was a good idea?

Puppet shows require a stage, an audience, puppets, and a puppeteer.

Coercion is SOP. So is polling.

[southernmissouri2007]

Why do mostly Republicans go to the Bohemian Grove do any Democrats gi to the Bohemian Grove too why is it mostly Republicans this is what I have heard ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Grove

[southernmissouri2007]

I meant to say do any Democrats go to the Bohemian Grove ?

[Constitutionary]

Sure.  Many homosexual Globalist politicians go to the Bohemian Grove.  It's about sexual orientation not political affiliation.

I knoooooooooooooooooooooooooooowww.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvGCVMvZi6U   

[Jordan]

I meant to say do any Democrats go to the Bohemian Grove ?

Yes.

[WLGarrison]

Nixon called Bohemian Grove the "faggyest"(sic) place he had ever seen.  I'm not a homophobe (to each his own.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPb-PN9F2Pc

[southernmissouri2007]

Is the Cremation of Care a theatrical production or a play does this even matter thank you ?

Cremation of Care
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Cremation of Care is an annual theatrical production written, produced and performed by and for members of the Bohemian Club, and staged at the Bohemian Grove near Monte Rio, California at a small artificial lake amid a private old-growth grove of Redwood trees.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cremation_of_Care

[tritonman]

 I am going to have to side with Richard Millhouse Nixon on this, He said it was the "most faggy god damned thing you could ever imagine."  As well as the grove that pretty much sums up the cremation of care as well.

[JT Coyoté]

Is the Cremation of Care a theatrical production or a play does this even matter thank you ?

Cremation of Care
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Cremation of Care is an annual theatrical production written, produced and performed by and for members of the Bohemian Club, and staged at the Bohemian Grove near Monte Rio, California at a small artificial lake amid a private old-growth grove of Redwood trees.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cremation_of_Care

Much like Aaron and the Israelites fashioning and dancing around the golden calf, in Moses' absence, was a theater production... Cremation of Care is a yearly thing, every July 15th and has a definite meaning... like the WICCA Solstice rituals, and the yearly Christmas play at your church... My post above explains the the meaning in a nut shell of the "Cremation of Care"... You might listen to the first hour of the Show today... Cremation of Care is a death Cult ritual, pure and simple.

JTCoyoté

"The purpose of separation of church and
state is to keep forever from these shores the
ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of
Europe with blood for centuries."
~James Madison

[medicmike]

fuct up thing is these freaks shame the name of homo - homosexuals homosapien homogenates and everything else homo lol its  like the south park episode where garrison tries to get fired for being gay  {not gonna describe it here but ill provide a link FOR ADULTS ONLY} anyway point is chef tells the kids there is a huge difference between gays and whatever garrison is i think its called death camp of Torrence   >_< 
http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s06e14-the-death-camp-of-tolerance