|
attietewd
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: September 15, 2011, 09:10:17 PM » |
|
That is exactly what I am going to do. I saw another person on a different blog say they were writing Ron Paul's name in. I thought to myself...why don't I do that? So that's what I am doing!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Thus, condemnation will never come to those who are in Christ Jesus…”
|
|
|
|
decemberfellow
|
|
« Reply #41 on: September 15, 2011, 09:18:12 PM » |
|
Yes thank you JT a great way. I will spread the good news Ron Paul for President write em in.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mark12:
4And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.
5But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him
|
|
|
Geolibertarian
Global Moderator
Member
 Offline
Posts: 9,869
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.ae911truth.org
|
|
« Reply #42 on: September 16, 2011, 12:17:35 PM » |
|
That is exactly what I am going to do. I saw another person on a different blog say they were writing Ron Paul's name in. I thought to myself...why don't I do that? So that's what I am doing! How do you "write in" someone's name if it's a paperless, electronic voting machine? I've been asking people that question for years now, and have yet to get a satisfactory answer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Constitutionary
|
|
« Reply #43 on: September 16, 2011, 12:20:59 PM » |
|
How do you "write in" someone's name if it's a paperless, electronic voting machine?
I've been asking people that question for years now, and have yet to get a satisfactory answer.
Simple, do it by mail. Hell back in 2008 people in Florida were writing in Ron Paul's name. I wish they would have voted for Chuck Baldwin but 2008 was a messed up year. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Valerius
|
|
« Reply #44 on: September 16, 2011, 12:25:59 PM » |
|
Most places you have to be an official "write in" candidate. If not, the write in is destroyed and not counted in any way.
Not saying it is right by any stretch, just saying. Check your local rules.
This country even has ballot access blocks when not even on the ballot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"No man can put a chain about the ankle of his fellow man without at last finding the other end fastened about his own neck." -Frederick Douglass
|
|
|
|
Constitutionary
|
|
« Reply #45 on: September 16, 2011, 12:28:05 PM » |
|
Too bad all the non-Bilderberg parties don't back Ron Paul and put an end to 3rd party discrimination.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JT Coyoté
Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 3,047
"REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
|
|
« Reply #46 on: September 16, 2011, 01:24:40 PM » |
|
How do you "write in" someone's name if it's a paperless, electronic voting machine?
I've been asking people that question for years now, and have yet to get a satisfactory answer.
There is plenty of time to contact your election commission and demand your right to write in a vote on a paper ballot. Even if their is a bank of electronic vote stealers in your precinct there must be a ballot on which you can vote for the Candidate of YOUR CHOICE... Liberty is not without pain, especially when it is about to be crushed, it requires work to keep and work to maintain. Oldyoti "Ron Paul is the ABSOLUTE answer
to Tyranny." ~Mike Adams,
(Alex's guest host, in hour one, 9/16/11) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Constitutionary
|
|
« Reply #47 on: September 16, 2011, 02:28:14 PM » |
|
Still after Ron Paul gets elected we should prosecute those election agencies that perpetuate 3rd party discrimination.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
decemberfellow
|
|
« Reply #48 on: October 28, 2011, 10:49:02 PM » |
|
Ron Paul should run for president as a third-party candidate By Brent Budowsky - 10/28/11 09:33 AM ET Whether liberals, conservatives and true populists like it or not (and many do not), the most likely outcome of the nominating process is a general-election battle between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. This opens up a humongous opening for Dr. Ron Paul to run as a third-party candidate. It has been said of Mitt Romney that he has been a liberal, a moderate and a conservative. What will the next Mitt Romney be? Is there any serious conservative who trusts him? Of course not. If Ron Paul runs for president as a third-party candidate against Obama and Romney, he changes the entire dynamic of the campaign and totally transforms the national debate. Ron Paul would pick up significant new support running against two establishment figures such as Obama and Romney. He would win support from a wide tier of voters who would see Romney as a distrusted, establishment, old-Wall Street and banking country-club Republican. Romney is exactly the kind of Republican the legitimate Tea Party voters, true conservatives and genuine libertarians oppose as the dominating influence on the Republican Party. Imagine a general-election debate between Obama, Romney and Ron Paul! What a sight it would be to behold. Even with the media blackout against Ron Paul from many circles in the press, it would be impossible to deny him a chair in the presidential debate and would give Paul a huge platform to bring his ideas to the largest audience of the nation. In my view the Republican Party is not the natural home for Ron Paul. He is far too independent, far too unfriendly to the corporatist wing of Republicans, far too libertarian and far too threatening to the real power that runs the Republican Party.A Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul general election? Could happen. The debates would be worth the price of admission to the seventh game of the World Series. The Ron Paul news blackout would become a Ron Paul news surge!http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/190423-ron-paul-should-run-for-president-as-a-third-party-candidate |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mark12:
4And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.
5But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him
|
|
|
JT Coyoté
Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 3,047
"REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
|
|
« Reply #49 on: October 29, 2011, 05:44:13 PM » |
|
On the Radio Show yesterday, 10/28/11 in the first hour, Alex received a communication that Dr. Paul stated on Thursday that he has not ruled out a 3rd party jump should the republicans continue to not take him as a serious candidate... Bill Still may just be the place holder in the Libertarian party in my opinion... Y'all gotta remember that Ron Paul ran as Libertarian presidential candidate in 1988 and got a half million votes... that was when virtually no one was thinking about, let alone exposing this stuff ... The platform then, same as it is now... "Back to the Constitution and Boot Out the globalist bastids and their bankers"... PS... one of those 1988 votes, was mine btw...  Oldyoti "Cliches about supporting the troops are designed
to distract from failed policies, policies promoted
by powerful special interests that benefit from war,
anything to steer the discussion away from the real
reasons the war in Iraq will not end anytime soon."
~Ron Paul |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Freeski
|
|
« Reply #50 on: October 29, 2011, 06:47:30 PM » |
|
Absolutely! No one I know wants any of the other Republicans in the field, and we surely want no more of Barry...
So should Ron Paul not be nominated, what have we got to loose... writing him in will openly force the election judges to work for a change and if they attempt to fix it for the globalists we will have numbers to force them to show the proof... they will have to recount every ballot by hand.
We need to start making lots of "chatter" about this across the web... we need to get people thinking "out of the box" so to speak... and yesterday was not too early to begin organizing.
JTCoyoté
"The Law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it!
The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an
entirely contrary purpose! The law became the weapon of every kind of greed!
Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!
If this is true, it is a serious fact, and moral duty requires me to call the attention
of my fellow-citizens to it." ~Frédéric Bastiat, "The Law", 1850
Bump. This idea is solid. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Constitutionary
|
|
« Reply #51 on: November 01, 2011, 03:05:04 PM » |
|
On the Radio Show yesterday, 10/28/11 in the first hour, Alex received a communication that Dr. Paul stated on Thursday that he has not ruled out a 3rd party jump should the republicans continue to not take him as a serious candidate... Bill Still may just be the place holder in the Libertarian party in my opinion... Y'all gotta remember that Ron Paul ran as Libertarian presidential candidate in 1988 and got a half million votes... that was when virtually no one was thinking about, let alone exposing this stuff ... The platform then, same as it is now... "Back to the Constitution and Boot Out the globalist bastids and their bankers"... PS... one of those 1988 votes, was mine btw... Oldyoti "Cliches about supporting the troops are designed
to distract from failed policies, policies promoted
by powerful special interests that benefit from war,
anything to steer the discussion away from the real
reasons the war in Iraq will not end anytime soon."
~Ron PaulShows how bad the media was owned back then. I was so fed up with Bush/Dukakis in 1988. Of course I was still in HS and couldn't vote anyway still I had 2 history teachers that are pretty much the reason why I am into politics now. Of course this would be like going on Jerry Springer and expecting to be taken seriously... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHB2I83_N_khttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGGDVm4mmToTalk about the dark-ages of media. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
