I believe Amy Bishop was set up!

[donnay]

Okay guys I have a supposition to propose here...I have been following the Amy Bishop "alleged shooting" at The University of Alabama since last year, to try and connect the dots.  This morning in the news this article from Science Daily cropped up and got me to thinking again about Amy Bishop.  The Science Daily article pushes for more drugs to be tested.  Whereas Amy Bishop's discovery did not.

Amy Bishop was an assistant professor of biology at the University of Huntsville science department and she was on the verge of a breakthrough for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS and Lou Gehrig's disease).

The thread I started last year was:  *BREAKING* 3 killed in Alabama university shooting

From one of my posts, in the "Breaking 3 killed in Alabama University shooting" thread, information on Amy Bishop's research was published.  Here is an excerpt from her article:

"The free radical gas, nitric oxide (NO), is synthesized by many mammalian cells and is utilized for a variety of functions such as cellular signaling, neurotransmission, differentiation and as a bactericidal agent. At high levels, such as during induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), NO is toxic and plays a role in the pathology of injury and many diseases. It is also car cinogenic and mutagenic. Release of NO and other oxidants is implicated in the massive cell death (apoptosis) of motor neurons and their support cells, oligodendrocytes, after spinal injury. In many neurodegenerative diseases, including AIDS dementia, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Alzheimer's, NO-mediated damage is seen."

So Amy Bishop came across an idea to patent a portable cell incubator, along with her husband:  

"Intelligent Cellular Systems (IntellCell) is developing a commercial product from technology created by Dr. Amy Bishop, an assistant professor of biology, and her husband Jim Anderson, and patented through UAH.

In the short term, the system has possible applications as a low-cost replacement for larger and more expensive immobile incubator systems. Since it is portable, the small incubator might also be used for research growing cells in situ, with long-duration exposure to microgravity, radiation or industrial pollution. It might also be used for long-term microscope studies, in which cells are grown under constant scrutiny.

"This also opens the door for the automation of specific biological and biomedical research," Bishop said. "We found out that there is a huge demand for this product."



So I hope you are bearing with me on this one, but since day-one of the information about Amy Bishop, I have had a gnawing feeling, in my gut, that tells me she is a victim and has been set up.  I truly think Amy Bishop was deliberately set up because her possible findings would give hope to people with AIDS, dementia, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Alzheimer's.

Amy Bishop and her husband were also was against people taking SSRIs.

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on motor neuron survival
Rapid Communication
(15275) Article views
Authors: Lily B Anderson, Phaedra B Anderson, Thea B Anderson, Amy Bishop, et al.
Published Date May 2009 Volume 2009:2 Pages 109 - 115
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S4310

Lily B Anderson1, Phaedra B Anderson1, Thea B Anderson1, Amy Bishop2, James Anderson2

1Cherokee Labsystems, Huntsville, AL USA; 2Department of Biology, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA

Abstract: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine and paroxetine are prescribed to relieve clinical depression and a variety of other disorders. Recently tardive dyskinesia, as well as other movement disorders, have been found to be a clinical side effect of SSRIs. In light of these emerging side effects, we asked if motor neurons were affected by SSRI. Motor neurons were challenged with fluoxetine and paroxetine at clinically relevant doses as well as at lesser and greater doses. Ethanol was used as a negative control and another group of cells was left untreated. As expected, in alcohol-treated cells, there was significant decrease in cell survival and neurite outgrowth. In untreated cells there was no effect in either cell survival or neurite outgrowth. In fluoxetine-treated motor neurons there was ~52% cell death while in paroxetine-treated cells there was 14% cell survival and both SSRIs caused significant loss of the percentage of neurite-bearing cells. Both SSRIs decreased cell survival in a dose-dependent manner. This study is provocative enough to call for further in vivo studies.

Keywords: fluoxetine, paroxetine, motor neurons, NSC34, neurotoxicity, SSRI

http://www.dovepress.com/effects-of-selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitors-on-motor-neuron-sur-peer-reviewed-article-IJGM

Personally, me thinks she was a target by Big Pharma.  They needed to shut her up, her findings were coming to close to a cure and then she had the nerve to diss SSRIs!

Any thoughts?

[kerrymti]

I think that may be right.  I have several friends at U of A, none of which think the story was like it was reported.  A few knew her and did not believe what the media touted, they felt like something was amiss.

[One Revelator]

The usual PTB MO is to simply kill any scientists that could disrupt, either by whistleblowing or discovery of something new, a known (to them) chemical/biological means of social control as long as the work is safely recovered. Another MO is to make the scientist an offer that he/she can’t refuse, mafia style.

She was not allowed to suicide and is being kept alive, Why?

Any “set-up” schemes need to be highly coordinated and there is plenty of room in the hierarchy of control for disconnects. Bishop did have connections with NASA’s Redstone Arsenal down the street and, through them, to Army medical research.

Could there have been conflicting interests between corporate Big Pharma and a higher authority concerning Dr. Bishop’s work? It might explain the highly unusual secrecy surrounding her legal processes ATM.

TPTB tried vainly to set up Hatfield for the anthrax thing. It didn’t work.

[donnay]

Thanks guys for the input.  I will continue to monitor any information I can get on this.  I just do not trust the establishment and as I said from day-one, this case did not sit well with my gut.

They might be keeping her alive to do further research under duress for TPTB.

[egypt]

I think you are right just from the standpoint there was a "school shooting" at all, Donnay.  That in itself sounds like black operations all around.

Then, take the target.  A  Scientist who is proving Big Pharma's darling drugs of reuptake inhibitors have outrageous affects that are the opposite of what they are prescribed for?  A Scientist who offered treatment and solutions to their soft kill weapon (reuptake inhibitors)?

On all fronts, when exposed, vicious attacks take place.  That in itself should be proof to doubters.

Love, e

[One Revelator]

Thanks guys for the input.  I will continue to monitor any information I can get on this.  I just do not trust the establishment and as I said from day-one, this case did not sit well with my gut.

They might be keeping her alive to do further research under duress for TPTB.

Another PTB MO has been simple vindictiveness, “show ‘em who’s boss”. That motive broadcasts a message to the target’s peers, to keep them in line. This tactic works in the short term, but has failed in the long term when the truth of something comes out anyways.

[donnay]

Another PTB MO has been simple vindictiveness, “show ‘em who’s boss”. That motive broadcasts a message to the target’s peers, to keep them in line. This tactic works in the short term, but has failed in the long term when the truth of something comes out anyways.

Absolutely...the reports written after the incident were nothing but articles hell-bent on discrediting anything Amy Bishops accomplished.  Then they resort to character assassinations and get so-called colleagues and people who knew her, make sure they pointed out that she was an odd-ball, first and foremost, to mold the readers or listeners views immediately.  Carefully crafted by design.

I noticed that in many of the reports after the fact.

She is not getting her Constitutional rights to a fair and speedy trial too.