PrisonPlanet Forum
May 22, 2013, 05:47:11 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Odd predictive progarmming 9/11 Twin Towers  (Read 3545 times)
zdux0012
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 876



« on: August 20, 2011, 12:28:49 AM »

http://i.imgur.com/iSPrC.jpg
Logged

Get off of Windows / Mac!! You are not safe.
Get an OS you can trust. Linux, Free BSD. Ask for help!
worcesteradam
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3,869


Knight Commander of the Old Republic


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2011, 01:31:10 AM »

huh
how about that
Logged

"Outlaws have their uses." - Earl of Newark
Eckhart Tolle
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,508



« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2011, 02:41:54 AM »

Wow wtf?

That is messed up.. whats date on this and info?
Logged


US Map of Live Police,Fire,EMS Scanner Streams


www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/

LIVE TV WORLD NEWS STREAMS /w Chat

www.rentadrone.tv/
Jenna_Jynx
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 292


« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2011, 05:22:48 AM »

When was this made?
Logged
masterofsuspense
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2011, 05:46:47 AM »

That is very weird, from the style of the illustration I would place that in the 80's, and short googling came up with Jenburkt the Indian manufacturer was formed in 1985, but searching the drug Cartisafe turned up to be registered in 2006 in many different countries.
Logged

Surrender out of fear, or fight to the end and inspire others, the choice is yours.
Jenna_Jynx
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 292


« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2011, 05:50:29 AM »

Ok, so when was this made?

Does anyone have any actual sources?  (It could be fake for all we know)
Logged
Eckhart Tolle
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,508



« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2011, 12:18:53 PM »

Ya I agree.. Seems fake.
Logged


US Map of Live Police,Fire,EMS Scanner Streams


www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/

LIVE TV WORLD NEWS STREAMS /w Chat

www.rentadrone.tv/
Dok
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,716



WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2011, 12:26:17 PM »

after 85 before 2001, http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.oddee.com/_media/imgs/articles/a237_wtc1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://thedailyblender.blogspot.com/&usg=__lC42KEfpGO_CLH7pvHEPHMDF-JU=&h=408&w=320&sz=26&hl=en&start=60&sig2=D54JNunefiXH-z4vfsuKVw&zoom=1&tbnid=2561R7bVLb_0sM:&tbnh=125&tbnw=98&ei=DU1RTvuzKojk0QGJw8TpBg&prev=/search%3Fq%3Djenburkt%26start%3D42%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1
Logged

HOW TO BE SAVED
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html

Ye Must Be Born Again!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Basics/ye_must_be_born_again.htm

True Salvation & the TRUE Gospel/Good News!
http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=1060

how to avoid censorship Wink
InsideJob
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 502



« Reply #8 on: August 21, 2011, 03:10:57 PM »

Osteoarthritis makes human legs pancake into dust.
Logged
zdux0012
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 876



« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2011, 12:00:51 AM »

I don't have any information on it, I found it online.
Logged

Get off of Windows / Mac!! You are not safe.
Get an OS you can trust. Linux, Free BSD. Ask for help!
Letsbereal
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 26,926


Know Thyself


« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2011, 02:26:33 AM »

Twin Towers were designed to withstand a Boeing 707 (707 compares very well with the 767) impact and could even withstand multiple impacts according to the Twin Towers construction manager.

Manager of Construction says WTC towers could withstand multiple impacts http://worldtradeconspiracy.com/index.php/world-trade-center/84-manager-of-construction-says-wtc-towers-could-withstand-multiple-impacts

"The building was designed to have a fully loaded [Boeing] 707 crash into it. 

That was the largest plane at the time. 

I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. 

It really does nothing to the screen netting."
Logged

->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-
mattj
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 246


« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2011, 10:55:57 AM »

Twin Towers were designed to withstand a Boeing 707 (707 compares very well with the 767) impact and could even withstand multiple impacts according to the Twin Towers construction manager.

You know you lose a lot of people when you say something so stupid as a "707 compares very well with the 767"
Logged
Letsbereal
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 26,926


Know Thyself


« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2011, 01:11:39 PM »

You know you lose a lot of people when you say something so stupid as a "707 compares very well with the 767"

Realy what's wrong with you people? If I for example say "The worlld is on fire" you come and say: "Hee you're stupid cause I spelled world with two LL's.

You are what we call a 'Krentekakker' here back in Hoboken. A 'dried grape pooper'.

Boeing 707 - 767 Comparison http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/boeing_707_767.html

In all the likely variations of an accidental impact with the WTC, the Boeing 707 would be traveling faster. In terms of impact damage, this higher speed would more than compensate for the slightly lower weight of the Boeing 707.

In conclusion we can say that if the twin towers were designed to survive the impact of a Boeing 707, then they were necessarily designed to survive the impact of a Boeing 767.

Logged

->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-
mattj
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 246


« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2011, 01:47:15 PM »

In all the likely variations of an accidental impact with the WTC, the Boeing 707 would be traveling faster. In terms of impact damage, this higher speed would more than compensate for the slightly lower weight of the Boeing 707.

In conclusion we can say that if the twin towers were designed to survive the impact of a Boeing 707, then they were necessarily designed to survive the impact of a Boeing 767.

I saw a interview with Leslie Robertson were he said they were designed to survive the impact of a lost 707-120 landing at JFK.

A 707 at 250 kts (max speed below 10,000 feet is 250 kts) at landing weight is nothing like a 767 at takeoff weight going a lot faster then 250 kts.



Logged
Letsbereal
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 26,926


Know Thyself


« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2011, 02:23:45 PM »

I saw a interview with Leslie Robertson were he said they were designed to survive the impact of a lost 707-120 landing at JFK.

A 707 at 250 kts (max speed below 10,000 feet is 250 kts) at landing weight is nothing like a 767 at takeoff weight going a lot faster then 250 kts.

But the Manager of Construction also said that the WTC towers could withstand multiple impacts so this realy is a non-issue.
Logged

->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-
mattj
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 246


« Reply #15 on: August 23, 2011, 02:37:45 PM »

But the Manager of Construction also said that the WTC towers could withstand multiple impacts so this realy is a non-issue.

It is a very big issue. When we are talking to people who don't believe 9/11 was a inside job we have to be 100% correct.   
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!