MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"

Author Topic: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"  (Read 16967 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline endof

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,709

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,519
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2011, 07:22:19 PM »
August 14, 2011 CNN
http://MOXNews.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iupRW1DE4KE
         MSM-  These rat bastards are a controlled syndicate.
 Bauchman paid for the votes, they may call it something else, give it a name. Free bus, food, entertainment, just give us a vote. This is a third world tactic and out in the open in our faces.
      Disapointed, noooo I'm pizzed off.
               America has a chance for a rebirth, RP is the man to do it.

Offline Dok

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,269
    • end times and current events
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2011, 07:26:19 PM »
amazing that they are admitting this. Is this a real program?

Quote
About this Show

Now more than ever, the press is a part of every story it covers. And CNN's "Reliable Sources" is one of television's only regular programs to examine how journalists do their jobs and how the media affect the stories they cover. Host Howard Kurtz, Washington Bureau Chief of The Daily Beast, is the nation's premier media critic, and each week he questions print reporters, television correspondents and Internet bloggers about how the press is covering the major stories of the week.

http://reliablesources.blogs.cnn.com/

 :o they just put it right out there.
HOW TO BE SAVED
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html

Ye Must Be Born Again!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Basics/ye_must_be_born_again.htm

True Salvation & the TRUE Gospel/Good News!
http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=1060

how to avoid censorship ;)

Offline endof

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,709
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2011, 07:28:38 PM »
is was recorded by the guy who runs the moxnewschannel on youtube, so i would assume yes. its stated it was recorded off CNN.
At the end, he loops a few things together.

Offline Jackson Holly

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,708
  • It's the TV, stupid!
    • JACKSON HOLLY'S OLD HOME PLACE
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2011, 07:30:04 PM »


WAIT!  Is this a replay from 2008?
Same sh*t ... different year.

St. Augustine: “The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it.
Let it loose; it will defend itself."

Offline endof

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,709
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2011, 07:35:51 PM »

WAIT!  Is this a replay from 2008?
Same sh*t ... different year.



no this was recorded today.

Offline Dok

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,269
    • end times and current events
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2011, 07:43:32 PM »

WAIT!  Is this a replay from 2008?
Same sh*t ... different year.



sshhhh, give them time and they will admit to that also.
HOW TO BE SAVED
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html

Ye Must Be Born Again!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Basics/ye_must_be_born_again.htm

True Salvation & the TRUE Gospel/Good News!
http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=1060

how to avoid censorship ;)

Offline Letsbereal

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2011, 08:38:19 PM »
Can't watch these slimeballs anymore.
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline endof

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,709
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2011, 09:01:54 PM »
there are multiple youtube accounts set up in the last few days, one example is this
http://www.youtube.com/user/WhyILoveRonPaul

They go around pretending to be ron paul supporters, but post many statements to the effect of 'i support ron paul for his racist views'.
I have seen other accounts just like this, its dirty tricks im certain of it.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2011, 09:49:50 PM »
there are multiple youtube accounts set up in the last few days, one example is this
http://www.youtube.com/user/WhyILoveRonPaul

They go around pretending to be ron paul supporters, but post many statements to the effect of 'i support ron paul for his racist views'.
I have seen other accounts just like this, its dirty tricks im certain of it.

National Clandestine Service is ultimately accountable for these operations within the United States
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=211322.0

The accountable head is John Bennett. He either is heading the operation or knows who is. See if he will be open to an interview to see why he is fraudulently using taxpayer money to engage in acts of wonton trilateral terrorism against the citizens of the United States of America.

http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/23/john-bennett-cia-appointment-is-a-mistake/
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/tag/john-d-bennett/



Check out this lawsuit complaint against Bennett (and other similar globalist puppets) seeking $2.88 quadrillion in damages because of the operations that Bennett (and other globalist puppet potato heads) engages in on a daily basis.


Plaintiff Seeks Freedom From Granfalloonery, Harassatoriness
http://www.loweringthebar.net/2011/05/plaintiff-seeks-right-to-be-free-from-granfalloonery-harassatoriness.html
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:

Michael M ____ v. City and County of San Francisco; San Francisco Superior Court; Dennis Herrera; Wayne Snodgrass; Andrew Gschwind; Harry Gower III; Robert Baysinger; Alisa Hollander Ella Yip; Adena Gilbert; Charlotte Woolard; Gail Dekreon; Ronald Albers; Vaughn Walker; George Bevan; Robert Dondero; Sandra Margulies; James Marchiano; A. Jeanne Jorge-Grove; Goldstein, Gellman, Melbostad, Gibson & Harris LLP; Michael Mak; North American Man Boy Love Association; David Thorstad; Robert Thorstad; Elizabeth Thorstad; ACT UP; Larry Kramer; Kevin Jennings; Ernest Goldsmith; Melanie Gheno; Gary Noda; Gibran Farrah; Michael Bowen; Leroy Rice; David Lambert; Ku Klux Klan; Hans Feulner; Erica Feulner; Paul Henss; John Demjanjuk; Josias Kumpf; Rell Kempf; George Rockwell Jr.; WUFENS; American Nazi Party; CHAPK; AYAK; CACI; Xe Services; Eric Prince; KBR Inc.; The Monsanto Company; Raytheon Company; Shaklee Corporation; Roger Barnett; Johannes Mehserle; Michael Rains; Greg Meyer; Donald Cameron; Mr. Sandino; Mr. Blond; Anthony Pirone; Marysol Domenici; Lynette Sweet; Dr. Joe Marshall; Robert Slaughter; Thomas Mazzucco; Kathryn Bardini; Dr. Charles Wexler; Carol Kingsley; Gregory Suhr; Kelly Dunn; James Lewis; Wendy Hurley; Gregory Neal; San Francisco Municipal Transit Authority; Nathaniel Ford Sr.; Andrew Cohen; Gavin Newson; Suliman Ashby; Stephen Ashby; Suliman Akabar; Suleman; Nicholas Clemons; Jennifer Newsom; John Hennessey; Ross Mirkarimi; San Francisco District Attorneys Office; George Gascon; Kamala Harris; Heather Fong; San Francisco Sheriffs Department; San Francisco Police Department; San Francisco Patrol Special Police; United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court; John Bates; Dee Benson; Thomas Hogan; Malcolm Howard; Martin Feldman; Mary McLaughlin; Frederick Scullin Jr.; Roger Vinson; Reggie Walton; Susan Wright; James Zagel; John Yoo; Mary Mason; Eric Holder Jr.; Lynndie England; Charles Graner; Kyle Foggo; Aldrich Ames; Robert Hanssen; United States Federal Bureau of Investigation; Robert Mueller III; United States Central Intelligence Agency; Leon Panetta; United States Department of Homeland Security; Janet Napolitano; United States National Clandestine Service; John Bennett; San Francisco Police Officers Association; San Francisco Police Credit Union; Gary Delagnes; The GEO Group; The Vanguard Group; ARAMARK Corporation; Guardsmark Inc.; United Geological Survey; Richard Cheney; Does 1-360 Million

Complaint for fraud, interference with economic relations and civil rights. The plaintiff, who ratified the New Constitution of the New United States in 2008, takes issue with the defendants' failures to prosecute crimes, safeguard citizens, or respond properly to his lawsuits. $2.88 quadrillion.

First, the list of defendants is pretty comprehensive. Any lawsuit against John Yoo or Dick Cheney probably has at least some merit, but many other political figures of both parties are named, as well as John Demjanjuk, Lynndie England, SF's MUNI transit system, NAMBLA, the KKK, and the U.S. Geological Survey. (Plaintiff originally sued George W. Bush and Al Gore, too, but appears to have crossed out their names in a last-minute change of heart.)

Second, the causes of action generally allege a failure to address various issues or to respond to prior complaints about them. These include killing Osama bin Laden, allegedly failing to prosecute NAMBLA, harboring Demjanjuk, and so on. Plaintiff also somehow manages to link a court's ruling on gay marriage to the "dropping of one nuclear atom-splitting Nazi wonder bomb" on Hiroshima. The USGS is accused of failing to evacuate San Francisco although it knows another earthquake is coming (which is true).

Third, the $2.88 quadrillion demand is not the biggest ever, and is well behind the $1.784 septillion demanded from Bank of America in 2009, but it's a lot. Note that the plaintiff demands $720 trillion in compensatory damages but only $2.16 quadrillion in punitive damages. The 3:1 ratio of this demand is much less than plaintiffs usually throw out there, although on the defense side we'd still have good arguments that it's way too high.

Finally, the complaint also contains this allegation --

69.    Defendants as set forth above ... have intentionally interfered with Plaintiffs' sovereign right to be free to enjoy quietly Plaintiffs' lives and to be free from Defendants' fraudulent, deceitful, fact-suppressing, intentionally misrepresenting, intentionally interfering, rights-depriving, racketeering, corrupt and/or battering torts, crimes, buffoonery, nuisance, Granfalloonery, false karassism, harassatoriness, embarrassments and/or unvague, specific Keystone Koppery.

Which, frankly, I'd like to see included in every complaint.

May 23, 2011 in Current Affairs


More on the NCS:


National Clandestine Service
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Clandestine_Service

The National Clandestine Service (NCS) (formerly known as the Directorate of Operations) is one of the four main components of the Central Intelligence Agency. Created in 2005, the NCS "serves as the clandestine arm of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the national authority for the coordination, de-confliction, and evaluation of clandestine operations across the Intelligence Community of the United States".[1] The current Director of the NCS is John D. Bennett.[2]

Creation of the National Clandestine Service

In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, a report by the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 conducted by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the 9/11 Commission Report released by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States identified serious shortcomings in the HUMINT capabilities of the US Intelligence Community ranging from the lack of qualified linguists to the lack of information sharing within the IC. These efforts resulted in the passage of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act in 2004 which created the position of the Director of National Intelligence and tasked the CIA Director with developing a "strategy for improving the human intelligence and other capabilities of the Agency.".[3]

Going even further, in 2004, Senator Pat Roberts, Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, drafted the 9/11 National Security Protection Act[4] in which he proposed that the Directorate of Operations be removed from the CIA and established as an independent agency known as the National Clandestine Service. The creation of the National Clandestine Service was also recommended by the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, the "WMD Commission".[5] The investigation by the WMD Commission found that HUMINT capabilities had been severely degraded since the end of the Cold War and were ill-suited to targeting non-state actors such as terrorist organizations. The WMD Commission also noted that HUMINT operations were poorly coordinated between the various federal entities who conducted them and encouraged the development of better methods of validating human sources, in light of the revelations about the source known as Curveball.

Beginning its study of the Intelligence Community in 1995, a non-governmental group, which included former Director of the National Security Agency Lieutenant General William Odom, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Lieutenant General Harry E. Soyster, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and current Director of National Intelligence Lieutenant General James Clapper, and former General Counsel for the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency Elizabeth Rindskopf Parker, issued a report, first in 1997 and in an updated form in 2002, which recommended the creation of the National Clandestine Service.[6]

The CIA announced the creation of the National Clandestine Service in a press release on October 13, 2005.[7] Contrary to Senator Roberts' proposal, the National Clandestine Service would be a component of the CIA, rather than an independent executive branch agency.

Historical Predecessors of the NCS

The Directorate of Operations (DO) was the branch of the CIA that ran covert operations and recruited foreign agents. The DO reportedly employed 1,000–2,000 people[citation needed] and was headed by a deputy director for operations (DDO). This directorate consisted of, among other subdivisions, a unit for political and economic covert action (the Covert Action Staff, or CAS), for paramilitary (PM) covert action (the Special Operations unit), for counterintelligence (the CI staff, or CIS]), and for several geographic desks responsible for the collection of foreign intelligence. It was created August 1, 1952, as the Directorate of Plans and was renamed the Directorate of Operations on March 1, 1973.[8]

The Directorate of Operations also housed special groups for conducting counterterrorism and counternarcotics, for tracking nuclear proliferation, and other tasks. Administrated by the DO, the paramilitary (PM) operations officers from the legendary Special Operations Group or (SOG) are maintained in the elite Special Activities Division (SAD). They are highly skilled in weaponry; covert transport of personnel and material by air, sea, and land; guerrilla warfare; the use of explosives; assassination and sabotage; and escape and evasion techniques. They are prepared to respond quickly to myriad possible needs, from parachute drops and communications support to assistance with counter narcotics operations and defector infiltration. Special Activities maintains a symbiotic relationship with the Joint Special Operations Command, and is run largely by former members of JSOC.[9] SAD/SOG is one of three special missions units. The other two are Delta and SEAL team six.[9]

In the 2003 book, Special OPS: America's elite forces in 21st century combat, the author states:
"Highly classified, the SAD is regarded as the preeminent special operations unit in the world. Members are the elite of the elite; "the best period." This results from the sources from which the organization recruits its members: Special missions units (SMUs); such as Delta Force and NSWDG (United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group)..." [10]

For special operations missions and its other responsibilities, the Special Operations staff attempted to recruit people with the appropriate specialized skills, although the geographic desks remain the principal units involved in the recruitment of personnel in so-called denied areas (Libya, Iraq, Iran, etc.). Special operations also provided special air, ground, maritime and training support for the Agency's intelligence gathering operations.

The DO has been subject to harsh criticism in the media, and due to its covert and independent nature did not, or could not, effectively respond. Its capabilities had been in decline since the public outcry resulting from the revelations of highly questionable actvities by the Church Committee. Furthermore, the DO fought frequent "turf" battles amongst the Executive Branch bureaucracies, most prominently with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, State Department and the Department of Defense. This was one of the principal reasons that the NCS was formed.

Organization

The current structure of the National Clandestine Service, under the Director of the NCS, is as follows, according to the Official CIA Organizational Chart:[11]

Deputy Director of the NCS
Counterproliferation Division
Counterterrorism Center
Counterintelligence Center
Regional & Transnational Issues Divisions
Technology Support Divisions
Deputy Director of the NCS for Community HUMINT
Community HUMINT Coordination Center

A major headquarters element was the Counterintelligence Staff, most powerful when headed by James Jesus Angleton. It was the principal US organization responsible for vetting potential new clandestine HUMINT assets, and for US offensive counterespionage and deception.

Under an assortment of names, such as Special Activities Division, there is a paramilitary function that may enter and prepare an area of operations before United States Army Special Forces enter in a more overt military role. This may or may not include psychological operations, especially black propaganda; paramilitary and psychological functions have split and joined under various historical reorganizations.

Various groups provide support services, such as cover documentation and disguise.[12] A technical services unit, sometimes in the clandestine division and occasionally in the Directorate of Science and Technology, contained both espionage equipment development and sometimes questionable research, such as the MKULTRA mind control program.

NCS Officers

The National Clandestine Service consists of six different types of officers[13] :

Below are brief descriptions of these six types of officers. For a more detailed description, visit the CIA website.

1) Operations Officers:
Operations Officers (OOs) are focused full time on clandestinely spotting, assessing, developing, recruiting, and handling individuals with access to vital foreign intelligence on the full range of national security issues.[14]

2) Collection Management Officers:
Core Collector-certified Collection Management Officers (CMOs) oversee and facilitate the collection, evaluation, classification, and dissemination of foreign intelligence developed from clandestine sources. CMOs play a critical role in ensuring that foreign intelligence collected by clandestine sources is relevant, timely, and addresses the highest foreign policy and national security needs of the nation.[15]

3) Staff Operations Officers:
Based out of CIA Headquarters in Washington, DC, Staff Operations Officers (SOOs) plan, guide and support intelligence collection operations, counterintelligence activities and covert action programs.[16]

4) Targeting Officers:
Officers in this career track will directly support and drive complex worldwide NCS operations to develop actionable intelligence against the highest priority threats to U.S. national security.[17]

5) Paramilitary Operations Officers:
Qualified candidates can expect to focus on intelligence operations and activities for U.S. policymakers in hazardous and austere overseas environments.[18]

The National Clandestine Service's primary action arm is the Special Activities Division (SAD), which conducts direct action-like raids, ambushes, sabotage, assassinations, unconventional warfare (e.g. training and leading guerrillas), and deniable psychological operations, the latter also known as "covert influence." While special reconnaissance may be either a military or intelligence operation, these usually are executed by SAD officers in denied areas.[9][19] Paramilitary operations officers are chosen mainly from the ranks of: the United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group and other SEAL teams; the U.S. Army's Combat Applications Group (Delta Force), Army special forces, and U.S. Army Rangers; the United States Marine Corps Forces Special Operations battalions (MARSOC); and the Air Force Combat Controllers and Air Force Pararescuemen.[9] SAD operatives are the most specialized because they combine the best special operations and clandestine intelligence (spy) capabilities in one individual. They operate in any environment (sea, air, or ground) and with limited to no support. They originate in the Special Operations Group (SOG) of SAD, considered one of the most elite special operations units in the world.[20] Paramilitary operations officers are the primary recipients of the coveted Distinguished Intelligence Cross and the Intelligence Star, the two highest medals for valor in the CIA. Not surprisingly, the majority of those memorialized on the Wall of Honor at CIA headquarters were covert operatives.[21]

6) NCS Language Officers
Performing a critical and dynamic function within the National Clandestine Service (NCS), the Language Officer applies advanced foreign language skills, experience, and expertise to provide high-quality translation, interpretation, and language-related support for a variety of NCS clandestine operations.[22]

Covert action

A covert action is defined as "an activity or activities of the United States Government to influence political, economic, or military conditions abroad, where it is intended that the role of the United States Government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly".[23] A covert operation differs from a clandestine operation in that emphasis is placed on concealment of the identity of the sponsor rather than on concealment of the operation.[19]

Covert operations include paramilitary and psychological activities. See Psychological Operations (United States) for a more general discussion of US psychological operations, including those operations for which the CIA is responsible and those that belong to other agencies.

Executive Order 12333 bans assassinations by persons employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government.[24]

Clandestine Collection of HUMINT

Legal Authorities

A number of statutes, executive orders, and directives assign the task of conducting HUMINT operations to the CIA:

1) By federal statute, the Director of the CIA is tasked with the collection of intelligence through human sources and by other appropriate means.[25]

2) Executive Order 12333[26] states that:

The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall coordinate the clandestine collection of foreign intelligence collected through human sources or through human-enabled means and counterintelligence activities outside the United States.

3) National Security Council Intelligence Directive No. 5 (NSCID 5)[27] provides that:

The Director of Central Intelligence shall conduct all organized Federal espionage operations outside the United States and its possessions for the collection of foreign intelligence information required to meet the needs of all Departments and Agencies concerned, in connection with the national security, except for certain agreed activities by other Departments and Agencies.

4) Intelligence Community Directive Number 340 designates the Director of the CIA as the National HUMINT Manager.[28]

Tradecraft

Techniques for the clandestine collection of HUMINT are collectively known as tradecraft. A discussion of many of these techniques can be found at Clandestine HUMINT operational techniques.

Very few statutes and publicly available regulations deal specifically with clandestine HUMINT techniques. One such statute forbids the use of journalists as agents unless the President of the United States makes the written determination to waive this restriction based on the "overriding national security interest of the United States.".[29] In the Intelligence Authorization Act for the Fiscal Year 2002, Congress directed the CIA Director to rescind what Congress viewed as overly restrictive guidelines regarding the recruitment of foreign assets who had a record of human rights violations.[30]

Camp Peary, often referred to as "The Farm", near Williamsburg, Virginia is purportedly a CIA training facility for clandestine operatives.

Clandestine technical collection

The Agency also may be responsible for developing communications systems appropriate for clandestine operations. In 1962, the Central Intelligence Agency, Deputy Directorate for Research (now the Deputy Directorate for Science and Technology), formally took on ELINT and COMINT responsibilities.[31] "The consolidation of the ELINT program was one of the major goals of the reorganization... it is responsible for: ELINT support peculiar to the penetration problems associated with the Agent's reconnaissance program under NRO. Maintain a quick reaction capability for ELINT and COMINT equipment."

"CIA's Office of Research and Development was formed to stimulate research and innovation testing leading to the exploitation of non-agent intelligence collection methods....All non-agent technical collection systems will be considered by this office and those appropriate for field deployment will be so deployed. The Agency's missile detection system, Project [deleted] based on backscatter radar is an example. This office will also provide integrated systems analysis of all possible collection methods against the Soviet antiballistic missile program is an example."

Sometimes in cooperation with technical personnel at other agencies such as NSA when the collection discipline is SIGINT, or DIA when the techniques come MASINT, or other appropriate agencies such as the United States Department of Energy for nuclear information, CIA may work to place technical collection equipment in denied territory. They have also cooperated in placing such equipment into US embassies. Emplacing and servicing such equipment is another form of clandestine operation, of which the adversary should not be aware.

These include:[31]
Research, development, testing, and production of ELINT and COMINT collection equipment for all Agency operations.
Technical operation and maintenance of CIA deployed non-agent ELINT systems.
Training and maintenance of agent ELINT equipments
Technical support to the Third Party Agreements.
Data reduction of Agency-collected ELINT signals.

See MASINT from clandestinely placed sensors. CIA took on a more distinct MASINT responsibility in 1987.[32] The National Security Archive commented, "In 1987, Deputy Director for Science and Technology Evan Hineman established... a new Office for Special Projects. concerned not with satellites, but with emplaced sensors – sensors that could be placed in a fixed location to collect signals intelligence or measurement and signature intelligence (MASINT) about a specific target. Such sensors had been used to monitor Chinese missile tests, Soviet laser activity, military movements, and foreign nuclear programs. The office was established to bring together scientists from the DS&T’s Office of SIGINT Operations, who designed such systems, with operators from the Directorate of Operations, who were responsible for transporting the devices to their clandestine locations and installing them".

Overt HUMINT

In addition they may produce HUMINT from overt sources, such as voluntary interviews with travelers, businesspeople, etc. Some of the latter may be considered open source intelligence OSINT and be performed by other agencies, just as reports from diplomats are another form of HUMINT that flows into the Department of State.

At times, this function may be assigned to CIA, because its counter-intelligence staff has biographical indexes that let them check the background of foreign citizens offering information. For example, there may be a name check on a business or scientific contact who meets either with CIA representatives or staff of the National Open Source Enterprise

Approval of clandestine and covert operations

The Directorate of Plans (DDP) was created in 1952, taking control of the Office of Policy Coordination, a covert action group that received services from the CIA but did not go through the CIA management. The other main unit that went into the Directorate of Plans was the Office of Special Operations, which did clandestine intelligence collection (e.g., espionage) as opposed to covert action.

Approval of clandestine and covert operations came from a variety of committees, although in the early days of quasi-autonomous offices and the early DDP, there was more internal authority to approve operations.[33] After its creation in the Truman Administration, the CIA was, at first, the financial manager for OPC and OSO, authorized to handle "unvouchered funds" by National Security Council document 4-A of December 1947, the launching of peacetime covert action operations. NSC 4-A made the Director of Central Intelligence responsible for psychological warfare, establishing at the same time the principle that covert action was an exclusively Executive Branch function.

Early autonomy of OPC

At first, the supervision by committee allowed the OPC to exercise

"early use of its new covert action mandate dissatisfied officials at the Departments of State and Defense. The Department of State, believing this role too important to be left to the CIA alone and concerned that the military might create a new rival covert action office in the Pentagon, pressed to reopen the issue of where responsibility for covert action activities should reside. Consequently, on June 18, 1948, a new NSC directive, NSC 10/2, superseded NSC 4-A.

NSC 10/2 directed CIA to conduct "covert" rather than merely "psychological" operations, defining them as all activities "which are conducted or sponsored by this Government against hostile foreign states or groups or in support of friendly foreign states or groups but which are so planned and executed that any US Government responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons and that if uncovered the US Government can plausibly disclaim any responsibility for them".

NSC 10/2 defined the scope of these operations as: "propaganda; economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance movements, guerrillas and refugee liberations [sic] groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world. Such operations should not include armed conflict by recognized military forces, espionage, counter-espionage, and cover and deception for military operations." [34]

Guerrilla warfare was outside this statement of scope, but such operations came under partial CIA control with NSC 10/5 of October 1951. See "Psychological Strategy Board" below. To implement covert actions under NSC 10/2, OPC was created on September 1, 1948. Its initial structure had it taking "guidance from the Department of State in peacetime and from the military in wartime, initially had direct access to the State Department and to the military without having to proceed through CIA's administrative hierarchy, provided the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) was informed of all important projects and decisions. In 1950 this arrangement was modified to ensure that policy guidance came to OPC through the DCI. During the Korean War the OPC grew quickly. Wartime commitments and other missions soon made covert action the most expensive and bureaucratically prominent of CIA's activities.

"Concerned about this situation, DCI Walter Bedell Smith in early 1951 asked the NSC for enhanced policy guidance and a ruling on the proper "scope and magnitude" of CIA operations. The White House responded with two initiatives. In April 1951 President Truman created the Psychological Strategy Board (PSB) under the NSC to coordinate government-wide psychological warfare strategy."

Putting special operations under a "psychological" organization paralleled the military's development of United States Army Special Forces, which was created by a Pentagon unit called the Psychological Warfare Division. "NSC 10/5, issued in October 1951, reaffirmed the covert action mandate given in NSC 10/2 and expanded CIA's authority over guerrilla warfare"[35] The PSB was soon abolished by the incoming Eisenhower administration, but the expansion of CIA's covert action writ in NSC 10/5 helped ensure that covert action would remain a major function of the Agency.[33]

As the Truman administration ended, CIA was near the peak of its independence and authority in the field of covert action. Although CIA continued to seek and receive advice on specific projects ...no group or officer outside of the DCI and the President himself had authority to order, approve, manage, or curtail operations.

Increasing control by CIA management

After Smith, who was Eisenhower's World War II Chief of Staff, consolidated of OSO, OPC, and CIA in 1952, the Eisenhower administration began narrowing CIA's latitude in 1954. In accordance with a series of National Security Council directives, the responsibility of the Director of Central Intelligence for the conduct of covert operations was further clarified. President Eisenhower approved NSC 5412 on March 15, 1954, reaffirming the Central Intelligence Agency's responsibility for conducting covert actions abroad". A series of committees, containing reprresentatives from State, Defense, CIA, and sometimes the White House or NSC, reviewed operations. Over time and reorganizations, these committees were called the Operations Coordinating Board (OCB), NSC 5412/2 Special Group or simply Special Group, Special Group (Augmented), 303 Committee, and Special Group (Counterinsurgency).[33]

Controversy

Former Director of the NCS Jose Rodriguez was criticized for his role in the 2005 CIA interrogation tapes destruction.

See also
CIA operations
Intelligence Community
Special Operations
"Wild Bill" Donovan
Office of Strategic Services
Church Commission
Special Activities Division

References
^ "Mission of the National Clandestine Service". CIA Website. https://www.cia.gov/offices-of-cia/clandestine-service/index.html. Retrieved April 28, 2011.
^ By Adam Goldman and Matt Apuzzo, Associated Press Writers (2010-07-21). "Retired spy hired to run CIA clandestine service". San Diego Union-Tribune. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jul/21/retired-spy-hired-to-run-cia-clandestine-service/. Retrieved 2010-11-23.
^ "Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Section 1011". PL 108-458. http://intelligence.senate.gov/laws/pl108-458.pdf.
^ "9-11 Act". 9-11 Act National Security Protection Act. http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2004_cr/roberts-911nspa.pdf.
^ "Unclassified Version of the Report of the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction". http://www.gpoaccess.gov/wmd/index.html.
^ "Moderning Intelligence: Structure and Change for the 21st Century". Modernizing Intelligence: January 2002 Edition. National Institute for Public Policy. http://www.nipp.org/National%20Institute%20Press/Archives/Publication%20Archive%20PDF/rev%20intel%20complete.pdf. Retrieved April 29, 2011.
^ Central Intelligence Agency (2005-10-13). "Establishment of the National Clandestine Service". Press release. https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/press-release-archive-2005/pr10132005.html. Retrieved 2008-11-14.
^ "CIA Celebrates 60 Years". Central Intelligence Agency. https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/cia-celebrates-60-years.html.
^ a b c d Waller, Douglas (2003-02-03). "The CIA Secret Army". TIME (Time Inc). http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101030203/
^ Special OPS: America's elite forces in 21st century combat, Fred J. Pushies, MBI Publishing, 2003, page 20. http://books.google.com/books?id=TLu2K11cXSMC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=&f=
^ Organizational Chart. Central Intelligence Agency. https://www.cia.gov/about-cia/leadership/cia-organization-chart.html
^ Mendez, Antonio J. (1999). Master of Disguise: My Secret Life in the CIA. William Morrow and Company, Inc. ISBN 0-06-095791-3
^ "NCS Career Opportunities". Clandestine Service Fields. https://www.cia.gov/careers/opportunities/clandestine/view-jobs.html.
^ "Operations Officers". Core Collectors. https://www.cia.gov/careers/opportunities/clandestine/core-collector.html.
^ "Collection Management Officer". Core Collectors. https://www.cia.gov/careers/opportunities/clandestine/core-collector.html.
^ "Staff Operations Officer". Headquarters-based Officers. https://www.cia.gov/careers/opportunities/clandestine/headquarters-based-trainee-program.html.
^ "Targeting Officers". Headquarters-based Officer. https://www.cia.gov/careers/opportunities/clandestine/headquarters-based-trainee-program.html.
^ "Paramilitary Operations Officer". Paramilitary. https://www.cia.gov/careers/opportunities/clandestine/paramilitary-operations-officer-specialized-skills-officer.html.
^ a b Joint Publication 1-02 Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. United States Department of Defense. 12 July 2007. JP 1-02. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf. Retrieved 2007-11-21
^ Waller, Douglas (2003-01-25). "The CIA's Secret Army". TIME Magazine. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1004145,00.html. Retrieved 2008-11-13.
^ Gup, Ted (2000). The Book of Honor: Cover Lives and Classified Deaths at the CIA.[page needed]
^ "NCS Language Officers". Language Officers. https://www.cia.gov/careers/opportunities/clandestine/ncs-language-officer.html.
^ "50 U.S.C. § 413b(e)". Title 50, United States Code, Section 413b Presidential approval and reporting of covert actions. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode50/usc_sec_50_00000413---b000-.html.
^ "E.O. 12333 (2.11) Ban on Assassination". E.O. 12333. http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12333.html#2.11.
^ "50 U.S.C § 403–4a". United States Code. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sec_50_00000403----004a.html.
^ "Executive Order 12333, as amended". Executive Order 12333, as amended. https://www.cia.gov/about-cia/eo12333.html.
^ "NSCID 5". National Security Council Intelligence Directive No. 5. http://cryptome.sabotage.org/0002/nscid-5-47-61.pdf.
^ "ICD 304". Intelligence Community Director No. 304. http://www.dni.gov/electronic_reading_room/ICD_304.pdf.
^ "50 U.S.C. § 403–7". Title 50, United States Code. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode50/usc_sec_50_00000403----007-.html.
^ "Intelligence Authorization Act 2002". Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002. http://intelligence.senate.gov/laws/pl107-108.pdf.
^ a b Central Intelligence Agency (May 1998). "Deputy Director for Research". CIA-DDR. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB54/st18.pdf. Retrieved 2007-10-07
^ Central Intelligence Agency (July 21, 1988). "Organization chart, mission and functions of the Office of Special Projects". http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB54/st39.pdf. Retrieved 2007-10-07
^ a b c "U.S. Covert Actions and Counter-Insurgency Programs". Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964-1968, Volume XXIV. http://www.state.gov/www/about_state/history/vol_xxiv/covert_actions.html
^ "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945–1950, Emergence of the Intelligence Establishment". U.S. Department of State. pp. Document 292, Section 5. http://www.state.gov/www/about_state/history/intel/290_300.html. Retrieved 2007-04-15.
^ Warner, Michael, ed (October 23, 1951). "NSC 10/5, Scope and Pace of Covert Operations". The CIA Under Harry Truman. Central Intelligence Agency
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Freeski

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,706
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2011, 09:56:23 PM »
"We are in the business of kicking candidates out of the race." CNN Anchor
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2011, 10:24:14 PM »
"We are in the business of kicking candidates out of the race." CNN Anchor


CNN/CIA THE ENEMY WITHIN
THE MASTERS OF DECEPTION
http://www.voxfux.com/archives/00000082.htm
by voxfux


The chilling reality of our time is that our biggest enemies are within.

CNN is one such enemy.

The New World Order crusaders know that it is better to control people and nations with the scientific application of fear and lies rather than the more unpredictable and expensive methodology of bullets and bombs.

So forty years ago, the CIA’s, “Operation Mockingbird,” went into full swing. The goal of the program was simply to control all mechanisms of opinion - the print news, the public opinion polls and the television news media. Their thinking was, if you control what people think, you’ve won the war before it has even begun.

And they have been frighteningly successful at achieving their goal - Since the 1950’s all major news and polling organizations have, to one degree or another, been absorbed into the sphere of control of the intelligence agencies. Now, the hard truth, which is simply too fantastic for most people to believe much less even comprehend in the first place is that the major news media is in actuality, mind controlling, opinion forming, population control mechanisms, and little else.

CNN is such a mind control machine.

CNN Being wholly a government propaganda machine, an organ of the CIA, and indeed as claimed by many in the right as well as left, extraordinarily influenced to the point of near subservience to a Zionist political agenda (more so than any discernible American agenda),

CNN is in charge of faking out the American people and tricking us into thinking there is support for the government, Bush and the war. CNN, Fox and the other government propaganda channels are clear warnings of what these New World Order types have in store for us - lies, war, death, slick 3D graphics, fraudulent polls, fraudulent elections, ominous theme music and dumb newsreaders.

CNN - the masters of the televisual lie.

And so now, the reptilian newsreaders with hairdos and tanning cream at CIA-CNN issue the latest fraudulent poll - 70% of the people support the president. This poll is a lie. It is a fake poll. The polling organizations, Time, Gallop, USA Today, CNN and all the rest of the CIA front companies posing as legitimate news organizations are all controlled by the CIA who themselves answer to the billionaire bankers and industrialists. The function of these fraudulent polls is to get people to conform with what they are tricked into believing that “everyone else” is conforming to. The polls are designed to create your attitudes, not reflect them. It’s called, “push polling,” and it works.

Not in a million years do 70% of the people support the president. People in the big cities have never met anyone who supports this jerk in the White House, yet there is this myth perpetrated by the media that there are these giant pockets of people (presumably hillbillies and rednecks) somewhere (presumably in the “heartland” of America) who are the ones who comprise this overwhelming 70% majority of Bush supporters. But when you look at the map, there just isn’t that many people in the, “hillbilly belt,” to comprise this mythical 70%. And so what does that mean? It means folks that you’re being lied to on a scale you never even imagined possible. That is the biggest scam and biggest secret of today - That there could be such an all encompassing hoax, pulled off right before our eyes - is real. But it is.

The American media is so fraudulent - the communist Chinese or Soviets never dreamed of forcing such preposterous lies down the throats of their people. No Soviet ministry of propaganda ever had the vast resources that the new lie masters have. The Red Chinese never had the prowess to so completely obliterate the truth in real time and retransmit it as utter lies to such a well conditioned and eagerly awaiting obedient sheep-like television viewing audience.

Each reporter knows full well the extent of truth that CNN senior editors will accept (very little) and so they don’t even cross that line into the realm of truth in the first place. They wouldn’t risk submiting a balanced and objective news story because by doing so their career would be finished. Each reporter knows full well, the tight, rigid parameters with which he is permitted to report the, “objective truth.” Each reporter knows that TV news is a game of lies - pure lies.

And the lies work! You really can control the vast majority of American “opinion” with massive transmission towers and cable systems transmitting 24 hour a day lies. That’s how it’s done. If the lie is transmitted over and over and over again, and if the application of fear is constant and conducted with the utmost of scientific precision - people can be transformed into sheep and herded into a corral of fear where they become well behaved, obedient sheep.

So turn off your TV news and forget about the major polls.

Get out in the streets and take them back. Confront these reptiles and sheep among us who are ruining this planet. And attack them.

It’s time to hit the streets and create some ruckus.

There needs to be a massive convergence of protesters at CNN headquarters in Atlanta. CNN will of course barely mention the protest, but their ambitious fellow liars in the other lie machines across the news industry would race to cover such a protest. Even though these other lie machines themselves are CIA controlled just like CNN they will still air the protest - demonstrating that in fact these LieNews organizations are equal parts CIA control, government propaganda, and ratings hungry back stabbing reptiles seething to make a profit for themselves, eager to stab their own kind in the back as long as they could gain one more square inch for their little corner of the big lie.

It is the responsibility of every young person and every seeker of truth and freedom and everyone who wishes for a better world for themselves and families to rise up and fight this REAL ENEMY WITHIN. The lie transmitters must be jammed and there are ways to do this. Jam CNN everywhere and anywhere with every method possible. Confront and disrupt anyway possible all CNN reporters, news trucks, satellite dishes or office buildings.

Steer the discourse towards topics never before even heard of.. New memes need to start surfacing in the worlds press and in the state houses of the worlds governments.
Shift the paradigm of rhetoric. Try a few of these memes on for size. A few headlines we need to start seeing:
“Foreign government seizes the assets of CNN and expels it’s journalists”
“Citizens urge their government to ban all CNN operations within their borders.”

Cut them off at the neck. Here’s a good rhetorical question to plant in foreign forums throughout the world:

“Since CNN is a CIA “front company” shouldn’t we urge our leaders to include a manditory warning label on all CNN/CIA newscasts warning us that CNN is a US government propaganda channel?”
What happened to our truth in advertizing laws?
“Europe jams all US government propaganda channels.”
“Boycotts organized against all advertisers on CNN.”
“Protesters disrupt, for the 20th day in a row, all activities of CNN and it’s advertisers.”
You get the idea.
All free nations or defenders of liberty must make efforts to knock out the capabilities which allow CNN and others like it to propagate the US government lies. Governments need to immediately mount massive public awareness programs warning their people that what they are really up against is nothing more than a massive lie machine and that if the world simply unites against it, and exposes it for what it is, they can knock out these machines of fraud and death quickly. The world must unite to cut them off where they breath. Boycott all advertisers on CNN. Protest and interfere with all activities of CNN and it’s advertisers. Deface their advertisements. And spit on every element of that machine of lies and death. Before they kill you all.

Since news is vital to our mechanisms of consent we need to draft laws assuring that our news companies have not been infiltrated or operated by the CIA. Laws must be enforced requiring an open and auditable mechanism of oversight for all major public opinion machines. (Gallop organization, Neilson ratings group, CNN, Fox and the other machines of lies.) The American attitude and psyche needs legal enforcement of the laws already in place to protect citizens from manipulation by the scientists of deception, whether from intelligence agencies who master such psychological operations or political parties who have adopted the techniques gained from these shadowy agencies to influence or steal elections.

The lie is the enemy.

And no news organization anywhere on earth represents this lie more fully and completely than CNN.
It is the responsibility of individuals to learn the nature of this struggle and organize to stop these fraudulent groups from spreading their terror to the peaceful nations of the earth.

And so it has come down to this: Americans are tricked, by the news media’s lies and fear, into doing the dirty work of oppressing the rest of the world using American bullets and bombs.

But soon after the ruling elite has finished using these deceived American worker ants and foot soldiers for their crusade of plunder they will turn the guns on these same worker ants and foot soldiers because there will come a day when the scientific application of lies and fear will no longer be sufficient to quell the unrest of these sheep and ants. The lie alone will no longer serve it’s function of suppression and will have to be supplemented with the next level, bullets.

When these New World Order murderers have exhausted the usefulness of the American sheep, American worker ants and American soldiers and there’s no more treasure to steal from abroad, when such a time arises that the sheep have nothing left to steal from others and nothing left themselves that is worthy of stealing, then and only then will these ignorant sheep, who supposedly support this crusade, see the fate that awaits them. Then and only then will the sheep see what these New World Order criminals have in store for them. Only then will they see the danger. Only then will the sheep decide that maybe it’s a good time to get off their knees. But by then it will be too late to rise up. For by then the sheep will fully fit within the vastly expanded definition of what a terrorist is. The definition of the word, terrorist by then will include any sheep who decides he wants a better life. It will be the twilight of the sheep - for the elites will find the few remaining thugs, reptiles, and pigs among us who are still ready, willing, eager and able, and pay them to turn the guns on the sheep, and slaughter the lot of them..

I never did like human sheep - so good riddance to them.

voxfux
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2011, 10:25:28 PM »
The G7 Bankster controlled CIA believes that our government should not exist and they are ongoingly engaging in these activities to destabilize the US. See if you can match the descriptions with the activities that the MSM and others engage in.

They are the radical anti-government fundamentalists, not us...

CIA Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare
First published by the Central Intelligence Agency and distributed to the Contras in Central America.
http://www.allworldwars.com/CIA-Psychological-Operations-In-Guerrilla-Warfare.html

PREFACE

Guerrilla warfare is essentially a political war. Therefore, its area of operations exceeds the territorial limits of conventional warfare, to penetrate the political entity itself: the "political animal" that Aristotle defined. In effect, the human being should be considered the priority objective in a political war. And conceived as the military target of guerrilla war, the human being has his most critical point in his mind. Once his mind has been reached, the "political animal" has been defeated, without necessarily receiving bullets. Guerrilla warfare is born and grows in the political environment; in the constant combat to dominate that area of political mentality that is inherent to all human beings and which collectively constitutes the "environment" in which guerrilla warfare moves, and which is where precisely its victory or failure is defined. This conception of guerrilla warfare as political war turns Psychological Operations into the decisive factor of the results. The target, then, is the minds of the population, all the population: our troops, the enemy troops and the civilian population. This book is a manual for the training of guerrillas in psychological operations, and its application to the concrete case of the Christian and democratic crusade being waged...

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline tritonman

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,085
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2011, 10:29:14 PM »
We all have known this for quite some time yes, but this is a stunning in your face admission all the same.   The worst of it is even after admitting this they will go on to do it again just like the conversation never happened.

Offline Freeski

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,706
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #14 on: August 14, 2011, 10:38:32 PM »
It's embarrassing how we humans fall for this crap.
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2011, 11:04:52 PM »
CNN And Politico: "We're going to ignore [Ron Paul]"
Submitted by SaveOurSovereignty on Sun, 08/14/2011 - 11:56
http://www.dailypaul.com/174118/cnn-and-politico-admit-ron-paul-media-conspiracy
http://youtu.be/5vRuy0m7IjA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vRuy0m7IjA

BUT WE ARE STILL GOING TO WIN!

Airing Date Aug.13, 2011

Cnn And Politico Admit Ron Paul Media Conspiracy !

I could not believe the honesty here in this clip, flat out saying the media is conspiring to ignore ron after his frand Ames showing.
Also not Howard Kurtz stupid little comment but yet very honest, he said " We are in the business of kicking candidates out of the race"
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2011, 11:06:30 PM »
Establishment Media Admits Ron Paul Conspiracy:
“We Are In the Business Of Kicking Candidates Out Of Races”

http://theintelhub.com/2011/08/14/establishment-media-admits-ron-paul-conspiracy-we-are-in-the-business-of-kicking-candidates-out-of-races/
The Intel Hub August 14, 2011

The corporate media is openly admitting that there is a conspiracy against Ron Paul. The establishment so called journalists of the corporate media have continually claimed that  Ron Paul cannot win when in reality he can absolutely win and has the support. How can CNN even consider themselves journalists when their panelists are openly admitting that they are in the business of kicking candidates out of the race and labeling them unelectable with no proof? The establishment FEARS Ron Paul and his freedom orientated message and has shown that they will do everything possible to demonize, attack, and ridicule Ron Paul.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Freeski

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,706
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2011, 11:09:07 PM »
Totalitarianism.
We have arrived!
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline RonPaulRocks

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,643
  • Neocons Beware!
    • Calgary 9/11 Truth
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #19 on: August 15, 2011, 12:09:06 AM »
I hope this wakes up the nation.  I believe people are going to vigorously fight the mainstream media now and get the word out about Ron Paul.
Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.  -- George Orwell

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #20 on: August 15, 2011, 07:49:56 PM »
Ron Paul got ‘shafted’ by the media: Politico’s Roger Simons
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/15/ron-paul-got-shafted-by-the-media-politicos-roger-simons/
By Eric W. Dolan Monday, August 15th, 2011 -- 6:37 pm

Politico's chief columnist, Roger Simon, on Monday accused the media of under-reporting Congressman Ron Paul's significant achievement in the Ames Straw Poll. Paul came in second place in the Ames Straw Poll, with 4,671 votes, barely falling below Congresswoman Michele Bachmann's 4,823 votes. But the media has almost exclusively focused on Bachmann and other Republican presidential candidates, despite Paul having only 152 less votes than the congresswoman. "I admit I do not fully understand Ron Paul and his beliefs," Simon said. "But I do understand when a guy gets shafted, and Ron Paul just got shafted. If Bachmann’s victory at Ames was good enough to gain her enormous publicity and top-tier status, why was Paul’s virtual tie good enough only to relegate him to being ignored?" he asked. Paul, a libertarian, has gained an enthusiastic following for his strong views on limited government, free market economics and non-interventionist foreign policy. In the 2008 Republican presidential primary, his views clearly made him an outlier, but -- thanks in part to the tea party movement -- many of his economic positions have now been adopted by mainstream Republicans. Nevertheless, according the Simons, the media still treats him as "an exotic, unworthy of attention."
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Freeski

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,706
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #21 on: August 15, 2011, 08:53:29 PM »
Ron Paul got ‘shafted’ by the media: Politico’s Roger Simons
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/15/ron-paul-got-shafted-by-the-media-politicos-roger-simons/
By Eric W. Dolan Monday, August 15th, 2011 -- 6:37 pm

Politico's chief columnist, Roger Simon, on Monday accused the media of under-reporting Congressman Ron Paul's significant achievement in the Ames Straw Poll. Paul came in second place in the Ames Straw Poll, with 4,671 votes, barely falling below Congresswoman Michele Bachmann's 4,823 votes. But the media has almost exclusively focused on Bachmann and other Republican presidential candidates, despite Paul having only 152 less votes than the congresswoman. "I admit I do not fully understand Ron Paul and his beliefs," Simon said. "But I do understand when a guy gets shafted, and Ron Paul just got shafted. If Bachmann’s victory at Ames was good enough to gain her enormous publicity and top-tier status, why was Paul’s virtual tie good enough only to relegate him to being ignored?" he asked. Paul, a libertarian, has gained an enthusiastic following for his strong views on limited government, free market economics and non-interventionist foreign policy. In the 2008 Republican presidential primary, his views clearly made him an outlier, but -- thanks in part to the tea party movement -- many of his economic positions have now been adopted by mainstream Republicans. Nevertheless, according the Simons, the media still treats him as "an exotic, unworthy of attention."

Now that's telling it like it is! To think that people actually watch the news every day, because they want to be "informed", and then they repeat the news to others -- but instead of learning, they are being programmed. They give you information (which always has an ulterior motive), but they also prevent you from seeing other things. Imagine what you could do with a brain that's begging for data? Most "media personalities" are puppets, just like politicians (actors) reading scripts -- and people eat it up. Bizarre!
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline Freeski

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,706
Ron Paul Takes The Lead in Iowa? Let's Ignore Him!
« Reply #22 on: December 19, 2011, 11:53:37 PM »
Ron Paul Takes The Lead in Iowa? Let's Ignore Him!

In this 15 minute segment on MSNBC's Morning Joe, they announce Newt's fall and Ron Paul's rise and then talk about everyone but Ron Paul. They mention his name a couple of times but the focus is on anyone else. It's become laughable!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTN6Gcc4tuc
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline Michele Delaney

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2011, 10:48:41 AM »
I think it's quite obvious that the media are puppets for the government, the politicians in Washington already have it all mapped out who they want to run against Obama. They use the media as a tool to knock out the nominees that pose the biggest threat to their agenda. What happened to freedom of choice here??? Washington is doing the choosing for us.

Offline decemberfellow

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,053
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #24 on: December 23, 2011, 11:18:24 AM »
I think it's quite obvious that the media are puppets for the government, the politicians in Washington already have it all mapped out who they want to run against Obama. They use the media as a tool to knock out the nominees that pose the biggest threat to their agenda. What happened to freedom of choice here??? Washington is doing the choosing for us.


 I see it is your first post, .  Amazing what you see when you become awake, sickening and sad also.   Anyways  welcome to Prison Planet Forum .
Rev21:4
And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.


Who am I
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Fk6dt_uHo

Offline diamondgussetinthecrotch

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • where you need it most!
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #25 on: December 23, 2011, 09:31:04 PM »
Quote
Possible Ron Paul Iowa Win Drives NeoCons to Apoplexy   | Print |   
WRITTEN BY WILLIAM F. JASPER      
FRIDAY, 23 DECEMBER 2011 19:00
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/10324-possible-ron-paul-iowa-win-drives-neocons-to-apoplexy


Rep. Ron Paul’s top-tier status heading into Iowa and New Hampshire means he definitely can’t be totally ignored by the major media, as he has been in the past. So the censors and blackout artists have been replaced by the smear bund. This past week they got pretty well revved up, but they’re still probably a long way from being in high gear.

As The New American's Jack Kenny noted here a couple of days ago in his article, “Campaign Could Get 'Downright Ugly' if Paul Wins Iowa,” the Big Government Republicans are sharpening their knives for a bloodfest.

But they’re not waiting for the results of the January 3, 2012 Iowa caucuses to get ugly.

Over the past week, the apoplectic attack dogs of the neoconservative kennel were unleashed for a rabid, howling blitz against the Texas Congressman. It’s testimony to Dr. Paul’s squeaky clean personal and political life that the attackers have been forced to fabricate issues with which to clobber him. No sex scandals. No political payoffs from Freddie Mac or favoritism for Goldman Sachs. No political flip-flops on issues. No sellouts to special interests. So how do you attack a straight arrow such as Dr. Paul who is a constitutional purist and has doggedly stuck to his convictions for over three decades of public life? Well, they’re dusting off their playbook from the 2008 presidential campaign, and adding a few new twists. The smear bund is harping on several memes, hoping that sufficient repetition from multiple voices will convince voters that Ron Paul is “dangerous,” “crazy,” a “pacifist,” an “isolationist,” a “conspiracy crank,” and a “grumpy old man.”

And, let’s not forget, most of all, the “racist” and “anti-Semite” labels the smear bund is attempting to affix to Ron Paul. In adopting this tactic, the neocon attack dogs have torn a page from the Obama/Democrat/MSM “progressive” playbook. Will this tune play in Des Moines, Davenport, Cedar Rapids — and beyond? Perhaps, with the woefully uninformed; but for the Tea Party conservatives in Iowa who form a large part of the Paul support base, this will sound precisely like the false charges which Tea Party activists have been subjected to for the past several years.

Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post ran a furious diatribe by National Review’s Rich Lowry on December 19 decrying Paul as “a ‘blame America first’ Republican” that “has taken a principled anti-government position and associated it with loons and bigots.”

According to Lowry, Paul is an “irritable, absent-minded-professor” with “a poisonous view of America” who is guilty of “race-baiting and rancid Israel-bashing.”

For his ad hominem attack on Paul as a racist and anti-Semite, Lowry cites as a source the intellectually dishonest James Kirchick of The New Republic, the “progressive” magazine that has endorsed and promoted Big Government socialism for nearly a century (and endorsed Bill Clinton and Barack Obama for President).

Kirchick, who is recycling material from his 2008 anti-Paul campaign, was given space in the neocon Weekly Standard’s December 26 issue (which appeared several days earlier in the online edition) to rail about “The Company Paul Keeps,” in which he condemns the Congressman for “decades-long promotion of bigotry and conspiracy theories.”

Matt Barber penned an op-ed for the Washington Times on December 21, 2011, deriding Ron Paul as “cute, but unstable” because he is unwilling to take America into another war against Iran. Says Barber:

I personally like Mr. Paul. He’s that affable — if not a little “zany” — uncle who has the whole family on edge at Thanksgiving. “Oh boy; what’s Uncle Ronny gonna say next?”

Still, you wouldn’t give Uncle Ronny the carving knife for the turkey, much less the keys to the Oval Office.

David Frum, the Canadian neocon and speech writer for George W. Bush, has been churning out regular anti-Paul rants at his Frum Forum that end up being quoted and reposted across the blogosphere. This past week he featured “Ron Paul’s Useful Idiots,” and in the previous two weeks blasted Paul in several columns. One of those columns attacked Paul for criticizing Newt Gingrich’s global warming commercial, in which Newt and Nancy Pelosi sat together on a couch to promote Al Gore’s green socialist regime for the planet, ostensibly to save us from human-caused, catastrophic climate change. Newt now says the ad was “dumb,” and is trying to distance himself from his “Green Conservatism.”

But Frum, a true believer in the global warming “crisis” — despite Climategate, the avalanche of data contradicting anthropogenic global warming (AGW), and the huge number of scientists opposing the draconian “solutions” — says, “Newt, Your Ad With Pelosi Wasn’t Dumb.”

Says Frum: "What's so objectionable? Is it the notion that climate change is occurring? There is a vast body of evidence that it is, in the form of a long-term rise in average global temperatures. There is also ample evidence that this change is due primarily to anthropogenic carbon emissions.”

Ergo, he says, it makes sense for the federal government to push and promote “clean” alternative energy, to replace dirty old oil and coal. (Yes, we need more Solyndra debacles that reward politically connected insiders with billions of taxpayer dollars for solar, wind, and ethanol boondoggles.)

Yet Frum, who supports Big Government and foreign intervention (almost) everywhere, is a darling of the Republican establishment and Big Media. The ultra-left Frank Rich of the New York Times, for instance, is a big fan, describing Frum’s book Dead Right as “the smartest book written from the inside about the American conservative movement.”

NBC’s Domenico Montanaro took after Ron Paul on December 21 on a catalog of his “controversial” stands and statements, including his opposition to the FDA’s persecution of dairy farmers who sell raw milk to customers who want it.

Blatherskite blogger Adam Yoshida seems to be wholly fixated on the threat that the Ron Paul revolution presents to Big Government programs, policies, and institutions that traditional conservatives oppose but neoconservatives embrace.

In his December 21 attack in American Thinker entitled, “The Madness of Ron Paul,” Yoshida blasts Paul, among other things, for wanting to abolish the Federal Reserve System. The “extremist views held by Paul,” he says, “are very dangerous.” In fact, claims Yoshida, they are “in truth, destructive to the ideals that he claims to hold dear.” Yoshida goes on to defend the Fed, an institution advocated by Karl Marx in the Communist Manifesto but wholly incompatible with the U.S. Constitution. According to Yoshida:

The primary virtue of the Federal Reserve and its printing presses is its flexibility. By maintaining control of the money supply, the Fed is able to exercise broad control over the direction of the economy.... Obviously this gives the Fed immense power over the economy, and certainly that power has been, is being, and will continue to be abused from time to time. However, that does not change the fact that these powers are vitally necessary.

“The time has come for a libertarian voice to make itself heard on national affairs,” says Yoshida. “Ron Paul, however, does not represent that cause. He is little more than a cranky old man espousing failed ideas that were obsolescent even when he was born.”

However, it is Ron Paul’s foreign policy that has most of the neocons in a dither. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Hugh Hewitt, Andy Dean, and the rest of the Bush league talk radio choir have been in overdrive, launching non-stop frenetic fusillades suggesting that Ron Paul would strip the nation of its defenses and bring catastrophic disaster upon us.

However, a calmer, rational look at Ron Paul’s foreign policy reveals a non-interventionist (not isolationist) policy in accord with the Constitution and America’s founders.

“Like every other conservative, Paul believes that America must have a strong national defense — he simply believes we can no longer afford our current irrational offense,” says Jack Hunter in “Why conservatives must adopt Ron Paul’s foreign policy” in a December 19 column in The Daily Caller. Hunter, who blogs for the Ron Paul campaign, raises important issues and challenges the usurpation of the “pro-defense” and “patriot” label of the neocons, who support perpetual and ever-expanding global war. Not only is that economically unsustainable, but immoral and counterproductive. Hunter writes:

Unfortunately, unlimited Pentagon spending remains the big government too many Republicans still love. During the Reagan era, when we were fighting a global superpower that possessed thousands of nuclear weapons, this made sense. It does not make sense anymore. Today, we are fighting individuals, or collections of individuals, with infinitely less military capabilities and no particular attachments to nation-states. Ask yourself this: What, exactly, does having thousands of troops stationed in Afghanistan do to prevent some sick individual from trying to blow up his underwear on an airplane? Just as important, ask this: Does having thousands of troops in places like Afghanistan make it less likely — or more likely — that some sick individual will try to blow up his underwear on an airplane? Our own military and CIA intelligence tells us that our overseas wars actually encourage terrorist attacks. A majority of the members of the U.S. military agree, or as a Pew Research Poll of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans published in October revealed: “About half (51 percent) of post-9/11 veterans say that the use of military force to fight terrorism creates hatred that breeds more terrorism."

Says Hunter: “Paul continues to make the same argument that former Chairman of the Joints Chief of Staff Mike Mullen has made: that our debt is the greatest threat to our national security.”

Nevertheless, as the Iowa caucuses draw nearer, the anti-Paul attacks and smears are certain to escalate — and get even nastier.

Offline Freeski

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,706
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #26 on: December 23, 2011, 09:40:40 PM »
Quote
However, a calmer, rational look at Ron Paul’s foreign policy reveals a non-interventionist (not isolationist) policy in accord with the Constitution and America’s founders.

Only an idiot (or a murderous globalist) wouldn't vote for Ron Paul.
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline Freeski

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,706
Re: MSM Reveals It's "Conspiracy To Kick Ron Paul Out Of The Race"
« Reply #27 on: December 27, 2011, 05:43:00 PM »
Ron Paul is unstoppable!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAifJ6l-QCQ

30 seconds of...  8)
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.