Please read this letter to anyone who continues to say, "there is no conspiracy"

Author Topic: Please read this letter to anyone who continues to say, "there is no conspiracy"  (Read 65710 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Everybody ready for some serious fricking truth bombing regarding this letter which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the British Empire has been infiltrating the Republic since 1919 and that their number one agent to assassinate our constitution (and anyone who got in the way of the British Empire's war on America) was Colonel House?

Here comes the money shot...
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS WAS CREATED IN 1921 BY COLONEL HOUSE


[...]

A Texan named House was a key individual before and during the Wilson administration. He helped establish the income tax, the Federal Reserve System, coined the phrase "league of nations," drafted the covenant for the League of Nations and presided over the creation of the Council on Foreign Relations (C.F.R.).

Col. Edward M. House (the title came from a Texas Governor) inherited a fortune estimated at around $1.5 million. He was born in Houston, Texas -- the son of a wealthy planter and banker. (38) Originally the House ("Huis") family was Dutch. House's family had lived in England for 300 years before his father came to Texas. (39) Thomas William House came to Texas to fight under Sam Houston and was an American agent for London Banking interests "said by some to the House of Rothschild..." (40) Edward House attended school in England for several years as a young boy: "Much of his youth and adult life was spent in the British Isles, which he regularly visited." (41) The elder House said he wanted to raise his sons to "know and serve England." (42) House surrounded himself with prominent members of the Fabian Society. (43) Between 1892 and 1902 he elected four Texas Governors. (44)

In the winter of 1911-1912, House wrote Philip Dru: Administrator. House said he was working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx..." The book was a fictional plan for the conquest of America by gaining control of both the Republican and Democratic parties and using them to create a socialist world government. Central portions of the plan included a graduated federal income tax and a central bank. (45) The book also outlined an inheritance tax and suggested taking functions away from the states. (46) It suggested a conspiracy "insinuated into the primaries, in order that no candidate might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs." (47) House passed the book to his father-in-law in New York City -- Dr. Sidney E. Mezes. Mezes, who read and approved the book, was Director of the College of the City of New York and former President of the University of Texas. House then sent the book to future Wilson cabinet member David F. Houston. Houston declared the work economically sound but said the fiction in it was so thin that he advised it be rewritten as a serious work. (48)

After his November 1912 election, Woodrow Wilson, on vacation in Bermuda, read Philip Dru. (49) Arthur Howden Smith wrote: "In nine months the Wilson administration completely reorganized the financial structure in accordance with the conceptions outlined in 'Philip Dru.'" (50) From 1912-1914, Wilson's legislative program "was largely the program of House's book..." (51) The New York Times in January 1913 found the authorship of Philip Dru to still be a puzzle. (52) In 1915 House was still trying to conceal his connection as author of the book. (53) Among those who read the novel was Franklin Delano Roosevelt -- then Assistant Secretary of the Navy -- whose mother was then and always a close friend of Colonel House. (54) It was published by B.W. Huebsch -- "a favorite publisher of the Left and for many years a valued collaborator of American Fabian Socialist groups." (55) In 1917 a bookseller wrote regarding the House book: "As time goes on the interest in it becomes more intense, due to the fact that so many of the ideas expressed...have become laws of this Republic, and so many of his ideas have been discussed as becoming laws." He ended with the question: "Is Colonel E.M. House of Texas the author? If not, who is?" Seymour admitted: "Colonel House was, in truth, the author; to his other occupations he added that of novelist." (56) Both Franklin K. Lane and W. J. Bryan commented on the influence of Philip Dru on Wilson. (57) In 1918, Franklin K. Lane, Woodrow Wilson's Secretary of the Interior, stated in a private letter: "All that book has said should be, comes about...The President comes to Philip Dru, in the end." (58) House's book has been said to have outlined the next 40-50 years in code (DRU is also said to be the code for David Rex Universe). (59)

Charles Seymour called Col. House "the unseen guardian angel of the (Federal Reserve) bill." (60) The banker J. Horace Harding held a dinner at which House "convinced the financial overlords that the Democratic donkey, with Wilson in the saddle, would not kick over the traces....The Schiffs, the Warburgs, the Kuhns, the Rockefellers, the Morgans put their faith in House..." (61) On November 17, 1913, Paul Warburg requested an interview, with House, to include Jacob Schiff and Cleveland Dodge. Dodge was grateful for a "substantial subscription for the Y.M.C.A. fund." Warburg did most of the talking. Schiff favored only four regional reserve banks. (62) Schiff said House was the Moses and they would be the Aarons: "He asked if I knew my Bible well enough for this to be clear to be. I told him I did." (63) Schiff then wrote to House on December 23, 1913: "I want to say a word of appreciation to you for the silent, but no doubt effective work you have done in the interest of currency legislation..." (64) After getting the Federal Reserve through, House then turned to international affairs. (65) House "had powerful connections with international bankers in New York. He was influential...with great financial institutions represented by such people as Paul and Felix Warburg, Otto H. Kahn, Louis Marburg, Henry Morgenthau, Jacob and Mortimer Schiff and Herbert Lehman. House had equally powerful connections with bankers and politicians of Europe." (66) Jacob Schiff died on September 25, 1920. Of all the other living bankers named by Smoot, all, without an exception, were later founding members of the CFR in 1921. (67) The original 270-secret crowd that created the Federal Reserve System "were all in the original (CFR) membership." They included Jacob Schiff, Averell Harriman, Frank Vanderlip, Nelson Aldrich, Bernard Baruch, J.P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller. (68)

Associates of J.P. Morgan and Company created an American parallel group to the Milner Group before the first World War. (69) The RIIA was an above-ground group: "During the Versailles Treaty talks after the war, Round Table members Lionel Curtis, Balfour, Milner, and others formed an above-ground group called the Royal Institute of International Affairs for the purpose of coordinating Anglo-American cooperative efforts. They decided also to form an American branch, but gave it a different name in order to secure its antecedents. Thus was born the Council on Foreign Relations, originally staffed by J.P. Morgan men and financed by Morgan money." (70) The two groups were established to prevent the American people from reacting with patriotic fury if it was discovered that the CFR was in fact a subsidiary of the British Round Table. (71) The man most responsible for creating subgroups of the Round Table was Lionel Curtis. He established local chapters of the Round Table called the Royal Institute of International Affairs: "In the United States, the Round Table 'front group' was named the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)." (72)

A savy observer has described the CFR's British front-role: "The interlock problem is conspicuous for another reason, one which has never been addressed by Congress. It seems that certain huge Yankee foundations, namely Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie, have been conscious instruments of covert U.S. foreign policy, with directors and officers who can only be described as agents of U.S. intelligence. According to Quigley, the roots for this can be traced to the establishment of an American branch of the British Royal Institute in 1921, which itself had grown out of the Rhodes Trust. The American branch, called the Council on Foreign Relations, was a largely a front for J. P. Morgan and Company." (73)

The Council on Foreign Relations Handbook of 1936 stated: "On May 30, 1919, several leading members of the delegations to the Paris Peace Conference met at the Hotel Majestic in Paris to discuss setting up an international group which would advise their respective governments on international affairs. The U.S. was represented by Gen. Tasker H. Bliss (Chief of Staff, U.S. Army), Col. Edward M. House, Whitney H. Shepardson, Dr. James T. Shotwell, and Prof. Archibald Coolidge. Great Britain was unofficially represented by Lord Robert Cecil, Lionel Curtis, Lord Eustace Percy, and Harold Temperley." The May 30th meeting was held at the billet of the British delegation and proposed an Anglo-American Institute of International Affairs -- one branch in London and one in New York. (74) The New York and London locations were appropriate since "nearly all of them were bankers and lawyers." (75)

The British moved quickly to establish their branch. (76) The establishment of the American branch was much slower. When the American delegates got home their fellow citizens were "absorbed in isolationism and prohibition, throughly inhospitable to the ideas of the League of Nations." (77)

So far no complete list of the fifty dinner guests has been located. It has been stated, however: "The twenty-one Americans, who, together with (their 29) British counterparts, founded in Paris The Institute of International Affairs, were a diverse group that included Col. Edward M. House, Herbert Hoover, Gen. Tasker Bliss, Christian Herter, and such scholars as Charles Seymour, later President of Yale, Professors Archibald Cary Coolidge of Harvard and James T. Shotwell of Columbia." (78) There were two camps. One was headed by the U.S. official negotiators Tasker H. Bliss and Edward House along with advisors Herbert Hoover and Thomas W. Lamont -- along with their aides. The other side was composed of the twelve scholars that had served the American delegation in an advisory capacity. (79) Most of the scholars were from Harvard, Yale and Columbia. (80)

The returning Inquiry scholars lacked the funds to create the envisioned American Institute of International Affairs but offered diplomatic experience, expertise and high-level contacts: "The men of law and banking, by contrast, could tap untold resources of finance...This was the synergy that produced the modern Council..." (81)  The money to found the CFR came in part from J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, Otto Kahn, Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg. (82)

Another source suggests that the original CFR itself had fund-raising problems: "They took the name of an organization already in existence. The original Council on Foreign Relations had been formed in New York in July, 1918, but in little more than a year had become inactive owing to an inability to raise the necessary funds. It was with 66 members of this original crowd that the peacemongers from Paris merged to form the organization we know today." (83)

J.P. Morgan's personal attorney, John W. Davis (and later Republican presidential candidate), was the founding President of the CFR. Paul Carvath, the first Vice-President of the CFR, also represented the J.P. Morgan interests. The council's first chairman was Morgan partner Russell Leffingwell. Morgan also had the loyalty of many professors due to his large academic endowments. (84) Paul Cravath was also the founder of the famous law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore. (85)

In summary, the Federal Reserve System, the League of Nations and the Council on Foreign Relations had both common origins and creators. Last, but not least,

the CFR was of British

-- not U.S. --

origin.


http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/shadow/cfrintro.htm


ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!?!?!

ARE YOU NOT WELL INFORMED ON WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY REGARDING TRUE CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGERS TO NATIONAL SECURITY?

HOU YA LIKE THEM APPLES ALL SABATEURS, INFILTRATORS, AND OCCUPIERS OF THIS GREAT LAND FROM SEA TO SHINING SEA.

GO HOME YOU F*CKING TRAITORS TO THE CONSTITUTION! YOU ARE EXPOSED BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, JUST LEAVE AND GO TO A COUNTRY WHICH WANTS TO BE ENSLAVED...WE DO NOT!
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Rtruth

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
Ya I hate that when people I talk to think of real issues as just "CT's". I tell them sometimes, well even the bible talks about conspiracies that when on, tons of them. Such as it says "cain conspired to kill able", "David conspired to send Uriah to the front lines to be killed so he could steal his wife". Daniels advisaries conspired to get the king to pass laws that they knew Daniel would even up breaking due to his faith in God. Josephs brothers conspired against him and sold him into slavery. The Pharisees conspired to incriminate Jesus on many occasions and have his killed. Judas conspired with the Pharasis to hand over Jesus for 25 silver pieces. And the list of these goes on and on. And the words used are "conspired" in most of the events talked about. So is the bible then a bunch of fiction too, absolutely NOT. The bible is a recording of history, so those are real events. Real conspiracies in the real events. But people of today are so domesticated, so naive, so brainwashed, so utterly hypnotised to think stuff like "The gov is my friend", the laws of the nation are completely legitimate and just, there's nothing going on behind the scenes or behind my back. There's no bad people or evil in the world. and on and on and on. It's really sad.

Offline BruntFCA2

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
An interesting read but I can't verify the letter's providence.

Looking at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_M._House

There is no mention of the "House Report".

I've also looked at "The intimate papers of Col House" referenced on the wiki page. Doing a search on "Lloyd George" brings up.

http://quod.lib.umich.edu/g/genpub/ACL9380.0001.001?type=simple&rgn=full+text&q1=lloyd+george&submit=Go

This letter does not appear. If the providence of this letter could be proved it would be quite significant.

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,516
  • "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
Everybody ready for some serious fricking truth bombing regarding this letter which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the British Empire has been infiltrating the Republic since 1919 and that their number one agent to assassinate our constitution (and anyone who got in the way of the British Empire's war on America) was Colonel House?

Here comes the money shot...

Yes At Least since 1919... the deeper truth is that it has been on going in incremental fashion much longer than that...

The vastness of America's resources has been the ultimate avarice of British Imperial interest since the days of Elizabeth I.

It is foolish to think that this was somehow changed by Cornwallis' signature on Gen. Washington's instrument of Surrender at Yorktown in 1781. The war only became covert at that point... think about it.

Oldyoti

"I always consider the settlement of America
with reverence and wonder, as the opening of a
grand scene and design in providence, for the
illumination of the ignorant and the emancipation
of the slavish part of mankind all over the earth."

~John Adams

Offline decemberfellow

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,040
Bump
Rev21:4
And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.


Who am I
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Fk6dt_uHo

Offline bovvered

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
Everybody ready for some serious fricking truth bombing regarding this letter which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the British Empire has been infiltrating the Republic since 1919 and that their number one agent to assassinate our constitution (and anyone who got in the way of the British Empire's war on America) was Colonel House?

Here comes the money shot...
There are people who are blind to these sorts of facts.  There are also people who are blind to facts going back much further than 1919 e.g. King George III dictated the terms of the 1783 Treaty of Paris.  Why did the king dictate the terms of the peace treaty?  Is that an important fact, or is it something inconvenient to be ignored at all costs?

The Informer Pt 2 (2/6): Black's Law Dictionary + King George III Kept His Colonies In 1783 Treaty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGS_92kfaUI

The Informer Pt 2 (3/6): The King Dictated 1783 Treaty + William The Conqueror Took The Land (1066)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8yU3PinNIk

There's a lot more info in this thread, for those who want the truth and the bigger picture, rather than just a small part of it.

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,426
Catchy: From the moment of my arrival here, it was evident to me that such an Anglo-American alliance as would ultimately result in the peaceful return of the American Colonies to the dominion of the Crown could be brought about only with the consent of the dominant group of the controlling clans.
  A relevant tid bit.
 Dig did some nice research..

Offline bovvered

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
Catchy: From the moment of my arrival here, it was evident to me that such an Anglo-American alliance as would ultimately result in the peaceful return of the American Colonies to the dominion of the Crown could be brought about only with the consent of the dominant group of the controlling clans.
  A relevant tid bit.
Relevant, but ultimately misleading because the colonies would not need to be returned to the Crown (which is not the monarchy) if the Crown never lost control and/or ownership of them in the first place.

The Informer has been lifting the veil on this for years, but for many people a lifetime of propaganda often proves far more powerful than the facts when it comes to questioning certain beliefs.  Just as some people will not question the idea that 19 hijackers were responsible for everything that happened on 9/11, because that particular explanation was given to them repeatedly, and why would anyone lie about that?  For some people, in some situations, the facts don't come into the equation.

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,163
    • From Hell to Veins
One thing most Americans do NOT understand is that Americans (the public) up to the first world war were NOT friends of Great Britain.  

It was well known by most Americans how the British were behind our disastrous civil war,  America was still dealing with British warships seizing American commercial ships and forcing our crews to serve on British ships.

These are 'Whitworth' British made cannons you can still find at Gettysburg with 'MADE IN ENGLAND' stamped on them, that the confederate army used.   Photo US national archive.

The British Anglo establishment that knew Americans would side with Germany in the first world war (which BTW would have been a huge monkey wrench to the NWO game plan) so, the British establishment bought up every major news paper they could in the United States and were all ready to set up the Lusitania for the plunge.

Britain and pro anglo American press argued that NO weapons were on the ill fated ship but independent divers calculated about 170 metric ton of ammo was indeed on the ship.  Churchill's famous "you got to break some eggs to make an omelet." quote was in reference to the Lusitania setup.

Nobody ever knew why the Captain of the Titanic lost his common sense to risk hitting an iceberg all in the name of shaving a couple days off the voyage.  Was he ordered by der queen to risk the lives of the passengers and crew?  One thing that is known for sure was, when the Germans sank the Lusitania the British OWNED US Press went into overdrive demonizing Germany AND CONSTANTLY COMPARING IT TO THE THE TITANIC DISASTER.  While demonizing Germany they conveniently left out the part where the British intelligence and military loaded the Lusitania to gills with heavy armor and then let on the German intelligence agents so to have the Germans sink it.  This would insure the queen that American soldiers would lose their lives in the name of Der Queen.   The pro Anglo film makers made a bunch of Lusitania films to help drum up support for England's war effort.  Germany had always been an American ally up until that point but with the 'false flag' the news print and hollywood in one hand and  Federal Reserve paid for pro Anglo politicians in the other ensured Americans would be suckered into never ending wars by fighting in the WAR TO END ALL WARS!!!!!      
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline adissenter2

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,044
  • Revolt Time
bumpage
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ! Molon Labe! Come and take them!

Offline Rtruth

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
wow that's crazy. makes a lot of sense

Offline rustygunn

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
There it is.  In your face as clear as day.  Thanks Dig. 

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,426
Great info!!
 Human beings have been controlled for what appears to milleniums, untill we the people realize we together are the masters of our destiny things won't change much. I'm Not being negative just making a point, united we can stand up and end the reign of the physcos in high places. They know this and are on full tilt with their fear, divisions, and mass deception.
  Bottom line, they are scared to death of us, the people being awake & united.

Offline infowarrior_039

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 789
  • explosions in the sky
    • Truth Archive

Offline infowarrior_039

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 789
  • explosions in the sky
    • Truth Archive

Offline flooride555

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
This is known as the 'House Report'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_M._House

As real as it gets!

Here is some info from Makow (not the best source, but here it is):

http://www.henrymakow.com/000426.html

Unfortunately, this "report" is a total fraud and was not written by Col. House. Good luck finding a single credible source saying otherwise. Cheers

Offline Jackson Holly

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,596
  • It's the TV, stupid!
    • JACKSON HOLLY'S OLD HOME PLACE
Unfortunately, this "report" is a total fraud and was not written by Col. House. Good luck finding a single credible source saying otherwise. Cheers

Oh yeah? Who was it written by?

St. Augustine: “The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it.
Let it loose; it will defend itself."

Offline bento

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
Typical non-evidential debunking by lazy people that provide zero support for their argument. This is BS because I said so.........
We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile, and nothing can grow there. Too much and the best of us is washed away.

Offline TonkaTim

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
One thing most Americans do NOT understand is that Americans (the public) up to the first world war were NOT friends of Great Britain.  
The British Anglo establishment that knew Americans would side with Germany in the first world war (which BTW would have been a huge monkey wrench to the NWO game plan) so, the British establishment bought up every major news paper they could in the United States and were all ready to set up the Lusitania for the plunge.

Also of note other anti-German/anti-American forces had come to our shores and where of great influence well before WW1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forty-Eighters
"The Forty-Eighters were Europeans who participated in or supported the socialist revolutions of 1848"

This seems to be crucial American history that is not taught or discussed. It is very worthy of study, when studied it becomes very obvious as to why.

Offline Valerius

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,865

The Irregulars: Roald Dahl and the British Spy Ring in Wartime Washington [Hardcover]

Jennet Conant (Author)
 
http://www.amazon.com/The-Irregulars-British-Wartime-Washington/dp/0743294580/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1344870003&sr=8-1&keywords=roald+dahl+secret+agent
"No man can put a chain about the ankle of his fellow man without at last finding the other end fastened about his own neck."  -Frederick Douglass

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Unfortunately, this "report" is a total fraud and was not written by Col. House. Good luck finding a single credible source saying otherwise. Cheers

* cat  investigates flooride555

Offline flooride555

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Oh yeah? Who was it written by?


Some fraud, I guess. It doesn't really matter. The burden of proof is on the person claiming it is genuine. Anyone can type up a rant on the internet, slap a date on it, and claim Julius Caesar wrote it. Doesn't make it true.

Offline Jackson Holly

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,596
  • It's the TV, stupid!
    • JACKSON HOLLY'S OLD HOME PLACE

Quote from: Jackson Holly on Today at 07:29:00 AM
Quote
Oh yeah? Who was it written by?

Some fraud, I guess. It doesn't really matter. The burden of proof is on the person claiming it is genuine. Anyone can type up a rant on the internet, slap a date on it, and claim Julius Caesar wrote it. Doesn't make it true.

It is no surprise that a document this damning would be disavowed
by TPTB. The date, June 10, 1919, was just a few days before the
official formation of RIIA and the CFR ... an auspicious date one
would think in the solidification of British autonomy on this continent.

The waters were muddied from the start when the "letter" surfaced
and was read into the `39 Congressional Record ... "too hot to handle!"

As with ANY historical document ... authenticity must necessarily be
determined almost entirely on circumstantial grounds. However ... if
it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck ... it's a duck.

Quote
The British Secret Service Report No. 1919, called the "Col. E. M. House letter," contains an official and authentic report of the First World War, the agency that brought it about and the purpose of it. This report in its entirety is highly interesting but the discussion here will be limited to "Imperial Unity," J P. Morgan & Company, British Duplicity, and the League of Nations.

This report, or letter, was presented to the House of Representatives by Congressman Thorkelson of Montana, and is published in the Congressional Record of October 13, 1919, p. 598-604 inclusive. Its authenticity was discussed by members of the House and an effort was made to strike it from the Record, which failed. See Congressional Record, October 11, 1939, p.714 et seq.; also of September 9, 1940, p.17835; and September 11, 1940, p.18311.

The letter or report is not published in the bound volumes of the Congressional Record of October 11, 1939, or the appendix of that date. Evidently some interested person prevented its publication, despite the refusal of the House of Representatives to strike it from the Record. The text as here set forth can be easily verified by reference to an original unbound copy of the Congressional Record of October 11 1939.


http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/house.htm

St. Augustine: “The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it.
Let it loose; it will defend itself."

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Some fraud, I guess. It doesn't really matter. The burden of proof is on the person claiming it is genuine. Anyone can type up a rant on the internet, slap a date on it, and claim Julius Caesar wrote it. Doesn't make it true.

So what content inside the document makes you think it is a fraud ?

Offline bento

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
Because he said so...... >:( What do you expect him to use the evil internet that lies to provide you with counter evidence?
We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile, and nothing can grow there. Too much and the best of us is washed away.

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Because he said so...... >:( What do you expect him to use the evil internet that lies to provide you with counter evidence?

I'm giving him a chance.

Offline flooride555

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
So what content inside the document makes you think it is a fraud ?

Again, there is nothing to suggest that it is genuine. Just a bunch of crap websites. When someone claims that a document is important ("proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the British Empire has been infiltrating the Republic since 1919 and that their number one agent to assassinate our constitution [...] was Colonel House?") but cannot provide any evidence whatsoever that it is what it says it is, then only a complete fool would fall for their line of BS. See: Protocols of Zion


EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Again, there is nothing to suggest that it is genuine. Just a bunch of crap websites. When someone claims that a document is important ("proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the British Empire has been infiltrating the Republic since 1919 and that their number one agent to assassinate our constitution [...] was Colonel House?") but cannot provide any evidence whatsoever that it is what it says it is, then only a complete fool would fall for their line of BS. See: Protocols of Zion



Do not side step.

IF there is anything in the content, that makes you doubt its authenticity, then please say so.


Simply saying "prove it" is troll behavior.

Offline empire

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 404
Thanks, great thread. Some awesome people frequenting these boards!

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,516
  • "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
Again, there is nothing to suggest that it is genuine. Just a bunch of crap websites. When someone claims that a document is important ("proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the British Empire has been infiltrating the Republic since 1919 and that their number one agent to assassinate our constitution [...] was Colonel House?") but cannot provide any evidence whatsoever that it is what it says it is, then only a complete fool would fall for their line of BS. See: Protocols of Zion



I'm curious, have you read the entire 2170 Page, 4 volume set titled The Intimate Papers of Colonel House arranged as a Narrative by Charles Seymour, published in 1926, with Prefatory Note by Edward House himself? (type in the search term Colonel House in the search block at the link)

If you have then you no doubt were taken back by things that are obviously missing from the period this set covers. The meetings in Paris and correspondences House shared with David Lloyd George were mentioned as side notes in the 4th volume without detail however... In the Prefaced acknowledgment Seymour mentions that much was left out that House felt would be inappropriate for the volumes.

Most of the letters are excerpts or not published at all including the British-American "alliance" discussions that were on going between House and Lloyd George over several years. They are mentioned here and there throughout the last two volumes, as are his several meetings with King Edward the V... but that's it, they're mentioned but never fleshed out at all; nor do we find but a very few of the hundred or so appendixes that House compiled that accompanied his many writings. This is a very purged and padded 2170 pages for sure.

It would also be obvious if you read them, that Mr. Seymour's volumes are designed to aggrandize E.M. House for the eyes of a contemporary late 1920s audience in the wake of the defeat of the League of Nations. These volumes are a preparatory, ammunition if you will, in the push for world government by tax exempt foundations in their infiltration of higher education with imperialist globalist ideas, (as was uncovered by the Reece Committee in the 1950s) to emerge once again 20 years later, after another World War, and give birth to the united nations...

If you read these books of historical slant with todays eyes, you can glean the character and motivation of this man who helped create the Federal Reserve, pushed for American entry in "The European War" on the side of Britain, and worked tirelessly for a body of world government, and was co-founder of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) branch of the British Ministry of Foreign Affairs, while working lock-step with the Monarchies and banking houses of Europe.

This Letter was apparently leaked from House's papers in 1938 or so just after he died. Much of his library and papers were locked away at Yale university Library by his estate trust. It is unknown who lifted it from there, or if it was just copied and then returned. It was totally unknown until after WWII however, in 1946 or '47, about the time the National Security Act was passed.

You mention this letter as the same kind of "BS" as the Protocols of Zion which could not be proven and has since been disproved as a hoax. This letter however, squares with the historical time-line, as well as the time frame of the meetings mentioned and correspondences exchanged, and it seems it cannot be disproved and thus may well be exactly what it is, authentic.

And finally... shame on you for floating that "way over the top" Zionist red herring. Tsk-tsk...

JTCoyoté

"To say that any people are not fit for freedom,
is to make poverty their choice, and to say they
had rather be loaded with taxes than not."

~Thomas Paine

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,939
I'm curious, have you read the entire 2170 Page, 4 volume set titled The Intimate Papers of Colonel House arranged as a Narrative by Charles Seymour, published in 1926, with Prefatory Note by Edward House himself?

If you have then you no doubt were taken back by things that are obviously missing from the period this set covers. The meetings in Paris and correspondences House shared with David Lloyd George were mentioned as side notes in the 4th volume without detail however... In the Prefaced acknowledgment Seymour mentions that much was left out that House felt would be inappropriate for the volumes.

Most of the letters are excerpts or not published at all including the British-American "alliance" discussions that were on going between House and Lloyd George over several years. They are mentioned here and there throughout the last two volumes, as are his several meetings with King Edward the V... but that's it, they're mentioned but never fleshed out at all; nor do we find but a very few of the hundreds of appendixes that House compiled that accompanied his many writings. This is a very purged and padded 2170 pages for sure.

It would also be obvious if you read them, that Mr. Seymour's volumes are designed to aggrandize E.M. House for the eyes of a contemporary late 1920s audience in the wake of the defeat of the League of Nations. These volumes are a preparatory, ammunition if you will, in the push for world government by tax exempt foundations in their infiltration of higher education with imperialist globalist ideas, (as was uncovered by the Reece Committee in the 1950s) to emerge once again 20 years later, after another World War, and give birth to the united nations...

If you read these books of historical slant with todays eyes, you can glean the character and motivation of this man who helped create the Federal Reserve, pushed for American entry in "The European War" on the side of Britain, and worked tirelessly for a body of world government, and was co-founder of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) branch of the British Ministry of Foreign Affairs, while working lock-step with the Monarchies and banking houses of Europe.

This Letter was apparently leaked from House's papers in 1938 or so just after he died. Much of his library and papers were locked away at Yale university Library by his estate trust. It is unknown who lifted it from there, or if it was just copied and then returned. It was totally unknown until after WWII however, in 1946 or '47, about the time the National Security Act was passed.

You mention this letter as the same kind of "BS" as the Protocols of Zion which could not be proven and has since been disproved as a hoax. This letter however, squares with the historical time-line, as well as the time frame of the meetings mentioned and correspondences exchanged, and it seems it cannot be disproved and thus may well be exactly what it is, authentic.

And finally... shame on you for floating that "way over the top" Zionist red herring. Tsk-tsk...

JTCoyoté

"To say that any people are not fit for freedom,
is to make poverty their choice, and to say they
had rather be loaded with taxes than not."

~Thomas Paine


Well stated, JT, thank you for that excellent background information.
And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,516
  • "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
Well stated, JT, thank you for that excellent background information.


You're welcome Saty...

When you click on the link in my last post, you must type the words Colonel House in the search block... the results will give you 4 links. The last link is the full 4 volume set containing the 4th volume and the only way you can read the last volume. It's a big download though...

JTCoyoté

"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe,
and preserve order in the world as well as property... Horrid
mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the
use of them."
~Thomas Paine

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,516
  • "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
Here's an observational note by John McLure Hamilton, the Portrait Artist who painted this portrait of House in Paris in mid 1919. This was the time-frame of both the public and "secret" meetings House had with Lloyd George and King Edward V. Right before, for reasons that remain unclear to this day, Wilson abruptly removed his long time adviser and personal confidant Edward House, from his position at the Peace talks and the meetings on the League of Nations, sending him back to America...



Edward Mandell House

From: Men I Have Painted by John McLure Hamilton...


Hamilton says the following:

Quote from: John Hamilton
IN the summer of 1919, a few weeks before leaving America, I made a hasty trip to Oyster Bay, the once favourite residence of Colonel Roosevelt, to select among the names of a number of men who had become prominent during the war one whom I would be willing to paint for a national portrait gallery.

Several names were mentioned, but when that of "Colonel" House came up, I said, "That will do; I would rather paint him than any man in the country, not excepting the President." As the Colonel was then in Europe, as envoy plenipotentiary to the Peace Congress, and as I expected to be in London and Paris within a few weeks, a letter was sent to him asking him to grant me sittings.

I had not been in London more than three days before a cable message from New York arrived telling me to go to Paris at once, where the sittings had been arranged. Before leaving London a lady, who seemed to know Colonel House, told me I should not like him. For some reason, known only to herself, she made a statement which in the sequel proved to be peculiarly misjudged, for I have rarely met anyone I have liked more.

I must confess that one of my reasons for selecting Colonel House to paint was due to a feeling of curiosity to know him, and, if possible, to discover the secret of his apparent power over President Wilson.

Colonel House was living at the Hôtel Crillon, facing the Place de la Concorde, where many of the American missions were established, with their staffs. The Colonel received me with unusual grace and simplicity of manner, and in a voice of peculiar personal charm assured me of his goodwill towards the project in view. His friendliness was like that of one who had known me for years; all restraint was at once broken down, and although I recognized in him an unlimited reserve of both firmness and sternness, his chief apparent characteristic was an easy naturalness, blended with a manly gentleness, that might have deceived the unwary.

After making two slight sketches in charcoal, I began to paint. When the portrait was partially finished, the light seemed too dull to complete it; so the position was changed to one near the window, where a strong light was reflected from a wall opposite. Choosing the position of reading a book, the head slightly turned down, I painted the eyes raised and looking straight at me.

Colonel House's eyes are remarkable. Looking at him casually, an ordinary observer might see nothing uncommon in their general character or expression; but the quiet intensity of their gaze opens mysterious depths of latent feeling. That Colonel House knew their power is told in the following story: When Lloyd George first called to see him, Colonel House asked him to take a seat with his back to the window and his face in shadow, while the Colonel seated himself in full light opposite the window. As Lloyd George expressed some surprise at this, saying that the usual practice was to put the visitor in the light, where his emotions could be more easily read, Colonel House replied, "I do not need to see my visitors; I want them to see me, as I might have reason for downing them."

When Mrs. House came in one morning to see the portrait, she exclaimed at once, "I do not like it. I have never seen that look on his face." Turning to her, I said apologetically, "I am not painting a husband, but a public man." This did not convince her, although the secretary said afterwards to Colonel House that she knew the look very well and liked it. As no objection was made, I brought another canvas and painted the "husband," with his hat on, which pleased the wife and every one.

Colonel House is a small man, but he told me that he was the tallest of the five heads of the council who met at his house to discuss quietly the subjects of the day before going to Versailles. Here, in a room gaily decorated in bright, flowered damask, sat around a table five small men, representing the combined victorious military and naval power of the world—Clemenceau, Lloyd George, Colonel House, Orlando, and, the smallest of all, but by no means the least, Maréchal Foch.

The description of these gatherings stirred the imagination. In my mind's eye the five small men, the modern Cæsars and Napoleons, rose before me, all save one, the Napoleon of the company, dressed unbecomingly in tweeds and serges that assorted ill with the brocaded chairs—the wise old French statesman, the shrewd Briton, the suave Italian, the sphinx-like American, and the straight-forward soldier. Here was the historic subject of the war. Colonel House realized it even more vividly than I, and temptingly suggested the possibility of obtaining sittings for it. But I heard afterwards that the room had been dismantled by a modiste. A background could have been faked up; but when I thought how each one of these heroes had been beset by interviewers, photographers, and painters and sculptors, in addition perhaps to scissor artists, I concluded that I would not inspire in them a further hatred for the processes of Art.

Colonel House revealed only two things to me—his amiability and his idealism. Almost he persuaded me, by the former quality, to embrace the latter. When he said good-bye, a day or two before he sailed for America, my sympathy for him had been so strongly aroused that I was betrayed, by an emotion that it was impossible to suppress, to wish him success in the high aim which he shared with President Wilson, although my reason forbade me to harbour an illusion which in my heart of hearts I thoroughly disliked. If the races were ready for a universal dominion, there would be no need for it.  http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Men_I_Have_Painted/Edward_Mandell_House ... (emphasis is mine.)


And then there is this from the Master Educator and Historian John Taylor Gatto who illustrates his work not only with the great progenitors in the cause of American style liberty, but also those who have worked in their capacity against it. Gatto's purpose is to show, whether for the good or for ill, people will excel when as youths they interact in large part with the real world as a portion of their education, separate from the over-arch of constant pidgin-hole nannying, from the public regimented curriculum. It appears House was largely peer raised with little parental discipline, unlike most others coming up in that period... Here is Gatto's assessment of Colonel House's path...

Quote from: John Taylor Gatto
"No Limit To Pain For Those Who Allow It

One of the most telling accounts of schooling ever penned comes directly from the lips of a legendary power broker, Colonel Edward Mandel House, one of these grand shadowy figures in American history. House had a great deal to do with America’s entry into WWI as a deliberate project to seize German markets in chemicals, armor plate and shipping, an aspect of our bellicosity rarely mentioned in scholastic histories. When peace came, House’s behind-the-scenes maneuvering in the League of Nations contributed to repudiation of the organization. His management of President Wilson led to persistent stories that Wilson was little more than a puppet of the Colonel.

In his memoirs, The Intimate Papers of Colonel House, we get a glimpse of elite American schooling in the 1870s. House’s early years were school-free. He grew up after the Civil War, near Houston, Texas:

    "My brother James, six years older than I, was the leader....
We all had guns and pistols... there were no childish games
excepting those connected with war. [House was nine at the
time.] In the evening around the fireside there were told tales
of daring deeds that we strove to emulate.... I cannot remember
the time when I began to ride and to shoot.... I had many narrow
 escapes. Twice I came near killing one of my playmates in the
reckless use of firearms. They were our toys and death our
playmate."


At the age of fourteen House was sent to school in Virginia. The cruelty of the other boys made an indelible impression on his character, as you can sift from this account:

    "I made up my mind at the second attempt to haze me that
I would not permit it. I not only had a pistol but a large knife,
and with these I held the larger, rougher boys at bay. There
was no limit to the lengths they would go in hazing those who
would allow it. One form I recall was that of going through the
pretense of hanging. They would tie a boy’s hands behind him
and string him up by the neck over a limb until he grew purple
in the face. None of it, however, fell to me. What was done to
those who permitted it is almost beyond belief."


At the Hopkins Grammar School in New Haven at the age of seventeen, during the Hayes-Tilden campaign of 1876, House began to "hang around" political offices instead of "attending to studies." He came to be recognized and was given small privileges. When the election had to be ultimately settled by an Electoral Commission he was allowed to "slip in and out of hearings at will." House again:

   "All this was educational in its way, though not the education I
was placed in Hopkins Grammar School to get, and it is no wonder
that I lagged at the end of my class. I had no interest in desk tasks,
but I read much and was learning in a larger and more interesting
school."


House’s story was written over and over in the short, glorious history of American education before schooling took over. Young Americans were allowed close to the mechanism of things. This rough and tumble practice kept social class elastic and American achievement in every practical field superb."

John Taylor Gatto

© 2000-2003 The Odysseus Group

JTCoyoté

"Learned Institutions ought to be favorite objects
with every free people. They throw that light over the
public mind which is the best security against crafty and
dangerous encroachments on the public liberty."

~James Madison

Offline egypt

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,617
  • Love: A Wish to bestow the fullness of Joyous Life
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars
« Reply #74 on: September 23, 2013, 05:45:36 PM »

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/SILENT.pdf

Fascinating Important Information!  Pass it on to friends, family, the library - everywhere!

What I don't get is this.  What does a certain number of crazy nutso people who want to live out eternity in a tank, have to do with getting rid of the rest of us on the planet?  Why don't they build an underground city and simply go there?  How about the Moon or Mars?

Does anyone have some insight on this?

love, e

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,516
  • "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
Re: Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars
« Reply #75 on: December 04, 2013, 11:20:20 PM »

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/SILENT.pdf

Fascinating Important Information!  Pass it on to friends, family, the library - everywhere!

What I don't get is this.  What does a certain number of crazy nutso people who want to live out eternity in a tank, have to do with getting rid of the rest of us on the planet?  Why don't they build an underground city and simply go there?  How about the Moon or Mars?

Does anyone have some insight on this?

love, e


e,

It has to do with unbridled selfishness and power. To become the way they are they're raised early to have no deep and lasting trust for anyone. Everyone and everything within their sphere is an adversary or a tool, a means to an end, or a toy, or all of these, all must be dominated and controlled. The game they play is to own and control ALL. That which cannot be made to bend to their will must be destroyed.

These are psychopaths loosely bound in kindred distrust. They do not think, feel, or rationalize like the rest of us. Any manner of sharing or freely given cooperation is foreign to them. They amass wealth and power by finding something they can use against everyone so as to control them. Their sick ego driven individualism manifests as destructive megalomania disguised as altruism. A sick dichotomy that is by definition at odds with all individual mores and cultural ethics...They elevate themselves by tearing down all around them if need be in the name of saving the earth, thus, they feel free, almost duty bound, to prey upon anyone they deem useless... at the very top of the pyramid this means everyone.

Hope this helps...

JTCoyoté

"Youth should learn to think and
 act as a mass.  It is criminal to
think as individuals!"
~Che Guevara