Yeah they say you need to pick your battles. The thing is that I've been in this exact type of battle before, and I already know exactly where it will end. Nowhere.
So as you can see, my name on YouTube is IamNemoN01. I'm arguing against ZoeMarks.
I'm 100% convinced that these people who constantly thrash these free energy videos are government reps. There are thousands of scams out there; but these videos are selling NOTHING. So who is it hurting by posting them? The answer is that if more people learn how easy it is to make electricity out of practically nothing, it will "hurt" the men who gain from the present enslavement to fossil fuels.
When I was about 16 or 17, I came up with this magnet motor idea myself. (I see today that the concept makes so much sense that I was not the only one who realized the potential of natural magnets.) I went to work on a prototype and blueprints, and was very selective of who I spoke to about it. But in my research over the years (without the internet back then) I also learned about all the inventors who have introduced alternate energy sources, and had either been killed, or just ruined. Tesla is only the most prominent to come to mind. I was weighing how far I should take the project when two relatively wealthy people offered to fund me. But ultimately I decided that it would be a waste of my time and of resources, and stopped development.
I know I can't convince the person on YouTube; but I CAN put out the call there for people to experiment.
__________________________________________________________________________My call is this...
I present this simple equation: E=v (where E=energy, and v=velocity or motion)
Einstein's equation discusses time (time movement and space/time) and mass, and touches on the movement of objects in relation to speed; but it's a little deficient on mass's movement translation to energy (or at least it is in application). I have two separate theories, one involving the movement of physical objects, and the other involving light
in particular which could be an addendum to E=MC2, but I won't dare yet propose replacing it (E=MC2 works pretty darned well so far). But let us not get into the theory of light (or some theory of everything which may not even exist—perhaps there is no theory of everything and there is simply just two theories). My light theory will take many more years to work out, and is very involved—but is thus far proving theoretically workable.
(I fully realize that even here on this site, that proposing this E=v may be met with much scoffing, laughing, heckling, and attempts to ruin my credibility by perhaps projecting out to others the idea that I never graduated grade school; but I don't care. I've played this game before. Such assumptions are just dirty pool tactics, and low blow, cheep shots for lack of credible evidence against what I present - and they are in actuality scarecrow arguments to draw people away from learning the hidden truth. I'm confident in who I am and what I know and understand.)
Energy = motion. This is not a "theory" at all, because it is tested and true avery day, and has been tested and proofed throughout history - for nothing that makes energy is inert. Take water for example. It is living, and can produce energy in many many ways. When we drink it, water's stored energy charges our bodies. And if you extract hydrogen from it, we see the same - a transference of energy. But what happens to water that is not moving? It becomes stagnant. It is dead. It can benefit nothing and must be recycled and recharged. This too is done by motion - for without motion it could not evaporate or be brought up into the atmosphere to recharge.
We can take this water in motion = energy farther by discussing any of the methods in which we implement it as an electricity source. Think about the following: Steam, Ocean Wave Power, Water Mill Generators, Or what ever you can think of, and think - would ANY of these be possible without motion? No. if you stop the wave, or the river, or the force and motion of the steam's excited molecules, then harnessing energy is absolutely impossible by these means. Energy = Motion.
__________________________________________________________________________The Truth About Energy
This is the little dirty secret that the governments don't want the average person knowing. They would like us all to believe that YES matter = energy; but only if we can somehow burn it. But even in those systems motion is a must. And the only reason we understand ANY of the alternates to burning is that non government people and teams and companies have experimented, learned, and proven them before the government could blackball them.
I was always the kid who experimented with EVERYTHING. I took things apart so I could know how they worked. In time relatives began buying me things to take apart because I was disassembling all their things (this didn't stop me from taking their stuff apart). In time I was the one who could also fix or make anything.
One of the simplest things I learned at about the age of 8 was that energy = motion. I did this by taking a small motor (generator) out of a toy battery operated truck, and simply hooking the motor's wires up to a small light and spinning the center shaft by hand. WOW, you don't "need" the battery to light up the light. You just need to put the generator into motion.
The government's view, and the view they have instilled into the education system is that combustion = energy, and almost every 'excepted' form of energy involves combustion or burning. The "internal combustion engine" operates off this principle. But what we are really seeing inside a combustion engine is that SOME FORCE is moving
pistons. It is the movement
within the engine, and not the combustion that is the true source of the energy and power. This has already been proven with solar and electric cars where there is no combustion. Rebuilding the motor (which changes it from being a combustion engine) accomplishes the same thing without combustion. So ANYTHING that moves the main shaft of the motor can provide the motion for the car to run. Gearing and perhaps stored energy can take care of the rest. (Let us not get too technical with the full mechanics of combustion engines and generators which has filled whole textbook sized books.)
So the simplest breakdown of E=v is that if an object moves at a constant rate and with a constant force, then some energy can be extracted from the apparatus through it's movement.
In a standard AC motor, we get movement by electricity (perhaps from a wall outlet) powering up an electro magnet system. But when we reverse this, and put propeller blades on the shaft, and put it on a large pole in a windy area, the motor has been inverted in a sense. Instead of electricity powering the motor, the motor is providing electricity by air flow - hence the "propeller" which suggests being propelled - or, movement (v) has made electricity or energy (E).
The fact is that if it has constant movement, it can provide electricity with little to no resistance (most motors use high resistance where it is not necessary to have resistance. Resistance is necessary for torque but not for electricity production. In fact resistance is avoided to get shafts to spin faster and produce more electricity in power plants. See, they know this. Torque is often ADDED to motors because resistance means more drag, which means more energy consumption, which spells more money for the power provider. A man posted a complete how to video to YouTube that showed how to remove resistance from electro magnet motors that increased power output, and the government keeps taking his video down.) This movement = motion has been known for generations; but it is kept out of textbooks. It is not taught as such
in accepted schools and books, so it is deemed social and scientific Heresy to speak it - and you WILL be flogged, socially ruined, or burned at the stake for it in some fashion or another - just like in the dark ages - nothing has changed. But take a look on YouTube and you will see perhaps a good hundred working examples (proofs) that this is true science. For instance, one kid hooked up a belt, stretched it taut, affixed magnets to the center of the belt, put it in front of a blowing fan, and had it pass through (flap or wave through) motor windings to light up a bulb. This is one of many examples that prove that motion, not heat or combustion = energy.
I have much more to say on this subject.
But what I would propose is that a group of people work out working models of these alternate energies, and instead of trying to get recognition and money for them, to mass e-mail the full schematics and building plans. If everyone
had full WORKING plans, then the governments (or those in charge) would scramble to shut it down and would be fighting everyone at once. Could you see them suddenly shutting down Radio Shack and taking baking soda off the market, maybe saying that the FDA has deemed it a poison? lol Or have them say on the news not to open the email because it contains the world's deadliest virus that will explode your computer and burn your house down—this can be counter measured with a clever preemptive. Stop caring so much about recognition, fame, and monetary gain. Forgo those which you will never receive anyway for the sake of free energy and sticking it to the man. You'll quicker receive a bullet in the head or an "accident" by the gov. than recognition and money.
So here is the little micro battle on YouTube. It's more of a joke than anything—but I would like to convince others that electricity is easily and elementary obtainable through motion. And they (the government gofers) have to keep sending people there to comment and heckle anyone who presents these ideas - because they are afraid
that people will learn the truth about energy and science. So they heckle the inventors and try to scare off anyone who could be a would be inventor. Most people are highly concerned about social status and fitting in, so this is effective.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jc9rbysrv24&feature=email&email=comment_reply_received