NET NEUTRALITY - FCC CONTROL - THE END OF INTERNET

Author Topic: NET NEUTRALITY - FCC CONTROL - THE END OF INTERNET  (Read 18192 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #80 on: February 26, 2015, 02:18:51 PM »


 Title II “Section 222: Privacy of Customer Information” has sweeping, under-appreciated, and negative implications for Google Inc.

...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/222
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/pdf/uscode47/lii_usc_TI_47_CH_5_SC_II_PA_I_SE_222.pdf
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,780
    • Sasha
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #81 on: February 26, 2015, 02:45:52 PM »
Newsweek ‏@Newsweek  · 1h1 hour ago 
Members of the audience celebrate as the #FCC votes to adopt new rules on #NetNeutrality http://bit.ly/1DWSNF6 



Wheeler and FCC Dems Celebrate



Wheeler's Celebration Cabaret
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline lee51

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,732
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #82 on: February 26, 2015, 03:03:42 PM »
What does this mean for Prison Planet?  Anyone know?

Offline Letsbereal

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #83 on: February 26, 2015, 03:17:59 PM »
FCC Approves Net Neutrality Rule https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3mOx9UaCkU

Feb 26, 2015 Bloomberg Business


Bye Bye Love https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRyrWN-fftE
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,780
    • Sasha
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #84 on: February 26, 2015, 03:43:56 PM »
The EFF put out an interesting bit of info that might apply if Infowars, Drudge, or anyone else are deemed to 'harm' internet users.

Quote
In a letter to the FCC, the foundation warned commissioners that they actually risk undermining consumers with the general conduct rule because the measure could allow the FCC to outlaw any practice that "harms" Internet users.

"A 'general conduct rule,' applied on a case-by-case basis with the only touchstone being whether a given practice 'harms' consumers … may lead to years of expensive litigation to determine the meaning of 'harm' (for those who can afford to engage in it). What is worse, it could be abused by a future Commission to target legitimate practices that offer significant benefits to the public . . . ," the foundation wrote in its letter.
http://www.newsmax.com/US/net-neutrality-Electronic-Frontier-Foundation-FCC/2015/02/26/id/627032/
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #86 on: February 26, 2015, 03:50:25 PM »
The EFF put out an interesting bit of info that might apply if Infowars, Drudge, or anyone else are deemed to 'harm' internet users.
http://www.newsmax.com/US/net-neutrality-Electronic-Frontier-Foundation-FCC/2015/02/26/id/627032/

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/02/dear-fcc-rethink-those-vague-general-conduct-rules


Quote
Unfortunately, if a recent report from Reuters is correct, the general conduct rule will be anything but clear. The FCC will evaluate “harm” based on consideration of seven factors: impact on competition; impact on innovation; impact on free expression; impact on broadband deployment and investments; whether the actions in question are specific to some applications and not others; whether they comply with industry best standards and practices; and whether they take place without the awareness of the end-user, the Internet subscriber.

There are several problems with this approach.  First, it suggests that the FCC believes it has broad authority to pursue any number of practices—hardly the narrow, light-touch approach we need to protect the open Internet. Second, we worry that this rule will be extremely expensive in practice, because anyone wanting to bring a complaint will be hard-pressed to predict whether they will succeed. For example, how will the Commission determine “industry best standards and practices”? As a practical matter, it is likely that only companies that can afford years of litigation to answer these questions will be able to rely on the rule at all. Third, a multi-factor test gives the FCC an awful lot of discretion, potentially giving an unfair advantage to parties with insider influence.
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #87 on: February 26, 2015, 03:58:15 PM »
EPIC VICTORY!
https://www.battleforthenet.com/

Quote
Washington insiders said it couldn't be done. But the public got loud in protest, the FCC gave in, and we won strong, Title II net neutrality rules. Now Comcast is furious. They want to destroy our victory with their massive power in Congress. You won net neutrality. Now, are you ready to defend it?
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Online TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,760
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #88 on: February 26, 2015, 04:02:45 PM »
EPIC VICTORY!
https://www.battleforthenet.com/

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/281832.Joseph_Goebbels
...
“Think of the press as a great keyboard
on which the government can play.”
― Joseph Goebbels
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,780
    • Sasha
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #89 on: February 26, 2015, 04:30:01 PM »
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/02/dear-fcc-rethink-those-vague-general-conduct-rules

Quote
The FCC will evaluate “harm” based on consideration of seven factors:...; impact on free expression

That could be read very broadly considering what types of copyright legislation are being purchased considered lately.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #90 on: February 26, 2015, 04:37:49 PM »
Battle for the net seems to think it is a victory for the internet. Will be interesting to read other reviews of the FCC ruling in the next 2 weeks or so!


Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
FCC - Net Neutrality
« Reply #91 on: February 26, 2015, 04:39:10 PM »
That could be read very broadly considering what types of copyright legislation are being purchased considered lately.


Yes, I would like to see a more in depth explanation on this topic!
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #92 on: February 26, 2015, 04:42:17 PM »
Dr Katherine Albrecht comments on ruling: (She may talk about this at some point on her radio show on GCN www.kmashow.com)
https://www.facebook.com/kmashow
http://www.katherinealbrecht.com/radio-show/
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,517
  • "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #93 on: February 26, 2015, 05:58:18 PM »
Battle for the net seems to think it is a victory for the internet. Will be interesting to read other reviews of the FCC ruling in the next 2 weeks or so!


They are calling this a win for the "free" internet... it's not... it's a win for Obama-Net, as the FCC poises itself closer to regulating the Internet..

It's a bunch of bi-polar posturing, pure crap...as if in a free market Comcast or any other single company could ever gain control of the Internet... without government help... which is the major unconstitutional problem in Washington as well as 50 out of the 50 state capitols, all of whom loath free markets.

It was all a "good cop-bad cop" side show... the government is now poised to regulate the Internet, that is if Congress doesn't tell them to flip-off...

Oldyoti

"Government's view of the economy could
be summed up in a few short phrases:
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving,
regulate it. And if it stops moving,
subsidize it."
~ Ronald Reagan

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #95 on: February 26, 2015, 08:49:55 PM »
They are calling this a win for the "free" internet... it's not... it's a win for Obama-Net, as the FCC poises itself closer to regulating the Internet..

It's a bunch of bi-polar posturing, pure crap...as if in a free market Comcast or any other single company could ever gain control of the Internet... without government help... which is the major unconstitutional problem in Washington as well as 50 out of the 50 state capitols, all of whom loath free markets.

It was all a "good cop-bad cop" side show... the government is now poised to regulate the Internet, that is if Congress doesn't tell them to flip-off...

Oldyoti

"Government's view of the economy could
be summed up in a few short phrases:
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving,
regulate it. And if it stops moving,
subsidize it."
~ Ronald Reagan



Some interesting Team Members on this list: (Move On,ACLU, etc. libs and conservatives. See companies and organizations)
https://www.battleforthenet.com/teaminternet/
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,780
    • Sasha
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #96 on: February 26, 2015, 10:56:49 PM »
Internet, RIP?
Ron Paul - February 26, 2015

Today the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a non-elected federal government agency, voted three-to-two to reclassify broadband Internet as a common carrier service under Title II of the Communications Act. This means that – without the vote of Congress, the peoples’ branch of government – a federal agency now claims the power to regulate the Internet. I am surprised that even among civil liberties groups, some claim the federal government increasing regulation of the Internet somehow increases our freedom and liberty.

continues:
http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2015/february/26/internet-rip/
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline PeaceAndFreedom

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 714
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #97 on: February 26, 2015, 11:15:48 PM »
It is always, always, always bad when the state declares jurisdiction over any area of free exchange or human action. The internet does not need a bunch of bureaucratic managers deciding (now, or eventually) what online sites or services should or should not exist, or how they should operate, but that is what we are now slated to get.

AJ disagreed with Paul's opposition to net neutrality, but Paul's point was always that NN was the camel's nose of a cause, to give the government the precedent it needed to get into the internet tent. We needed the MARKET of online users to give us net neutrality via their individual decisions, not a small band of state managers deciding what was 'neutral' or 'decent' for the rest of us.

Now the corporations will crash the tent, and 'advise' the managers what urls and portals should be punished more that others, leading to bottlenecked access to the 'no-no' sites like Infowars et al. This is D-Day for the net, and will be regarded in infamy more and more as the tyranny unfolds.
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered!... I am not a number, I am a free man!"

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,517
  • "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #98 on: February 27, 2015, 12:04:19 AM »
It is always, always, always bad when the state declares jurisdiction over any area of free exchange or human action. The internet does not need a bunch of bureaucratic managers deciding (now, or eventually) what online sites or services should or should not exist, or how they should operate, but that is what we are now slated to get.

AJ disagreed with Paul's opposition to net neutrality, but Paul's point was always that NN was the camel's nose of a cause, to give the government the precedent it needed to get into the internet tent. We needed the MARKET of online users to give us net neutrality via their individual decisions, not a small band of state managers deciding what was 'neutral' or 'decent' for the rest of us.

Now the corporations will crash the tent, and 'advise' the managers what urls and portals should be punished more that others, leading to bottlenecked access to the 'no-no' sites like Infowars et al. This is D-Day for the net, and will be regarded in infamy more and more as the tyranny unfolds.

I don't recall Alex being for any of the Internet Regulatory bills over the last decade or so whether it be CISPA, SOPA, PIPA, NN, or whatever... I watch the bunker pretty closely and I think you might be thinking of someone else...

JTCoyoté

"Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind...
the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit
of party are sufficient to make it the interest and
duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it."

~George Washington

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #99 on: February 27, 2015, 09:56:31 AM »
It appears that Team Internet was being naive in voting to grant an independent agency power over the internet:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/02/fcc-votes-net-neutrality-big-win


Quote
So congratulations, Team Internet. We put the FCC on the right path at last. Reclassification under Title II was a necessary step in order to give the FCC the authority it needed to enact net neutrality rules. But now we face the really hard part: making sure the FCC doesn’t abuse its authority.


I guess Team Internet hasn't been paying attention to ALL THE ABUSES coming from various entities of the government, from the President down. Were they naive in thinking this time it would be any different? I guess only time will tell, but if the FCC starts censoring FREE SPEECH on the net, then what will Team Internet do?
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,780
    • Sasha
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #100 on: February 27, 2015, 07:35:45 PM »
Judge Andrew Napolitano posted 23 hrs ago on Facebook:
"Net Neutrality - I Say it Will Be Overruled"

Judge Nap: Net Neutrality Rules Could Lead to Gov't Regulating Cost, Content
http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/02/26/judge-nap-warns-net-neutrality-rules-could-lead-govt-regulating-cost-content
Feb 26, 2015 - As seen on Shepard Smith Reporting

Judge Andrew Napolitano this afternoon weighed in on new net neutrality regulations adopted today by the FCC.

Read background from FoxNews.com:

Quote
The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday adopted sweeping new regulations sought by President Obama for how Americans use and do business on the Internet, in a party-line vote that is sure to be challenged by the broadband industry.

The commission, following a contentious meeting, voted 3-2 to adopt its so-called net neutrality plan -- a proposal that remained secret in the run-up to the final vote.

On its surface, the plan is aimed at barring service providers from creating paid "fast lanes" on the Internet, which consumer advocates and Internet companies worry would edge out cash-strapped startups and smaller Internet-based businesses. Chairman Tom Wheeler said it would ensure an "open, unfettered network."

But the rules, more broadly, would put the Internet in the same regulatory camp as the telephone by classifying it like a public utility, meaning providers like Comcast or Verizon would have to act in the "public interest" when providing a mobile connection to your home or phone.

So, will these regulations level the playing field for the “average Joe?”

Napolitano said that the government would like us to believe that. However, he explained that whenever the government regulates something, that regulated entity has to hire lawyers and internal people, and that cost is passed on to Americans.

He warned that whenever the government can regulate an entity, it will soon regulate cost and content.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #101 on: February 27, 2015, 07:52:24 PM »
FACT SHEET: PRESIDENT OBAMA’S PLAN TO REGULATE THE INTERNET
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0210/DOC-331958A1.pdf
http://www.fcc.gov/document/fact-sheet-president-obamas-plan-regulate-internet


Quote
President Obama’s plan will steadily increase regulation over time.

o The plan does not safeguard the Internet from additional regulations. Instead, it takes what it describes as an incremental approach to imposing those new regulations.

Everything THEY do is incremental! They get their foot in the door, then turn the screws! Here we go again!


Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #103 on: February 28, 2015, 04:26:03 PM »
You know all you got to do is just move your hosting outside the USA.
Believe it or not, there is a world outside America's borders.

Is the FCC gonna file a complaint to your hosting company in Russia or Iceland ?


Besides, after all the Snowdon Stiff, ain't it time to vote with your wallet ?
American Hosting - forget it.

Send the stock price down, they'll understand that.

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #104 on: February 28, 2015, 04:31:54 PM »
I list this just for example :


https://www.1984hosting.com/
Green, Ethical Web Hosting €4.99/mo
Safeguarding privacy and civil rights since 2006

    Unlimited Storage Space
    Unlimited Data Transfer
    Unlimited Domains on Hosting Account
    Green, Eco Friendly Energy
    99.99% Service Uptime
    Secure Email Accounts, IMAP or POP
    All Hosting Data Stored in Icelandic Data Centers

Here is an extract from their about us page

MMI and customers civil liberties. Unwavering loyalty to our customers and their fundamental rights is a core value of 1984, hence the name to remind us of what can happen if we fall asleep on our watch. We state that 1984 as a company and its officers will always go the extra mile to protect our customers' civil rights, including the freedom of expression, the freedom of the press, the right to anonymity and privacy. 1984 will always do everything within its legal power to inform our customers of any inquiries from any authorities, lawyers or courts into the customer's affairs that we may become aware of. It is essential that the jurisdiction that the company operates in is Iceland, where the IMMI legislation is forthcoming, making Iceland a haven for freedom of the press and freedom of expression in general.



This FCC garbage is just a joke. I list the above just as an example, but the point is you can avoid the FCC and do what ever you like, and there is nothing they can do about it. This FCC stuff is only bad news for some American Companies, its not bad news for Free Speech.

Online TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,760
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #105 on: March 03, 2015, 01:39:04 PM »
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/rudy-takala/house-tech-subcommittee-chairman-denounces-fccs-net-neutrality-rules
House Tech Subcommittee Chairman Denounces FCC's Net Neutrality Rules
March 2, 2015 - 5:39 PM
By Rudy Takala

(CNSNews.com) – Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR), chairman of the House Communications and Technology Subcommittee, denounced the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) recent passage of “net neutrality” rules, calling them “ill-advised, illogical and illegal.”
“The commission’s recent actions step well beyond its authority,” Walden, whose subcommittee oversees the FCC, told a gathering at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) on Monday.

The FCC is a child of Congress. It is high time that we returned to the good government practice of having the authorizing committee take a hard look at the agency before Congress hands over another appropriation…. It is essential we hold the commission responsible for the money they extract from the American public,” Walden said.
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,163
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #106 on: March 06, 2015, 05:02:21 PM »
The Problem With Facebook (A future look of the internet under FCC?)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9ZqXlHl65g#t=122
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,163
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #107 on: March 08, 2015, 10:46:22 PM »
[Video] The Threat Against Internet Freedom Worldwide
http://xrepublic.tv/node/12522

The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Online TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,760
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #108 on: March 09, 2015, 12:26:10 PM »
http://watchdog.org/203631/fcc-commissioners-regulations/
According to two FCC commissioners, those new regulations are bad all around
By Brad Matthews  /   March 4, 2015  /   2261 Comments
By Brad Matthews | Watchdog Arena

The Obama administration and proponents of the FCC’s version of net neutrality may be ecstatic at the passing of regulations that make the Internet a public utility on Feb. 26th, but not all FCC members are so sunny in their outlook for the future.

TechFreedom held a fireside chat on Feb. 27th with two FCC commissioners, Ajit Pai and Mike O’Rielly, and the two of them concurred that the new regulations are far-reaching, largely unchecked and pose a threat to consumer bills and to innovation in the industry.

Ajit Pai openly questioned what the problem was, saying, “There’s never been a systemic analysis of what the problem with the Internet is. In this order, you see scattered niche examples [Comcast and BitTorrent, Apple and FaceTime, others] all of which were resolved, mind you, through private sector initiatives.” He continued, saying that the FCC’s net neutrality regulatory regime is a solution that won’t work in search of a problem that doesn’t exist.”  Essentially, this is, contrary to the assertion of activists and others, a vaguely justified power grab by a government agency.

Mike O’Rielly added, in a bit of humor that “there is a problem, and it’s the document we adopted [Feb. 26].” Neither of them were reticent in explaining exactly how and why the document was the problem. For one, the document was, as Commissioner Pai pointed out, written to solve a problem that wasn’t readily apparent. O’Rielly said the document is “guilt by imagination, trying to guess what will go wrong in the future”; instead of tackling a readily apparent and current issue, the FCC proposal is instead stumbling forward, trying to find future, hypothetical transgressions to retroactively justify its own regulations.
...
...
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline larsonstdoc

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,341
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #109 on: March 09, 2015, 12:42:52 PM »



Ajit Pai openly questioned what the problem was, saying, “There’s never been a systemic analysis of what the problem with the Internet is. In this order, you see scattered niche examples [Comcast and BitTorrent, Apple and FaceTime, others] all of which were resolved, mind you, through private sector initiatives.” He continued, saying that the FCC’s net neutrality regulatory regime is a solution that won’t work in search of a problem that doesn’t exist.”  Essentially, this is, contrary to the assertion of activists and others, a vaguely justified power grab by a government agency.



  How much of government exists because they look for problems that don't exist?  50%?
I'M A DEPLORABLE KNUCKLEHEAD THAT SUPPORTS PRESIDENT TRUMP.  MAY GOD BLESS HIM AND KEEP HIM SAFE.

Online TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,760
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #110 on: March 12, 2015, 02:41:27 PM »
released in legalize:

http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

REPORT AND ORDER ON REMAND, DECLARATORY RULING, AND ORDER
Adopted: February 26, 2015 Released: March 12, 2015
By the Commission: Chairman Wheeler and Commissioners Clyburn and Rosenworcel issuing separate
statements;

Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly dissenting and issuing separate
statements.
....
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,163
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #111 on: March 12, 2015, 10:59:00 PM »
I WANT TO READ THE DAMN THING MYSELF!
-----------------------------------------------
FCC releases 313 pages of Internet order
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/235469-fcc-releases-text-of-internet-rules

The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday released the full text of its recently approved net neutrality rules, which face legal challenges and Congressional pushback.

The order alone runs for 313 pages. Including the statements of the five commissioners, the document hits 400 pages, with the two GOP dissents taking up the final 79 pages.

The rules were approved two weeks ago on a 3-2 vote and have proved controversial throughout the yearlong rule-making process. The FCC is sending the order to the federal register, and it will take effect 60 days after publication.
For months, critics and Republicans in Congress had called on the FCC to release the text of the rules early, given the huge interest surrounding them.

The rules were approved two weeks ago on a 3-2 vote and have proved controversial throughout the yearlong rule-making process. The FCC is sending the order to the federal register, and it will take effect 60 days after publication.
For months, critics and Republicans in Congress had called on the FCC to release the text of the rules early, given the huge interest surrounding them.

The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #112 on: March 13, 2015, 12:15:21 PM »
Here it is - It's 400 pages: (Alex will refer to subsections today on show, halfway through 1st Hour)
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Online TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,760
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #113 on: March 13, 2015, 02:52:17 PM »
Another Friday 13th !!!!

http://www.infowars.com/fcc-to-seize-cable-tv-broadband-regulations-for-internet-takeover/
FCC to Seize Cable TV, Radio & Broadband Regulations for Internet Takeover

FCC cherry picking existing laws for cable, radio & broadband to regulate Internet
by  Alex Jones & Kit Daniels | Infowars.com  | March 13, 2015

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/03/12/here-are-all-400-pages-of-the-fccs-net-neutrality-rules/
Here are all 400 pages of the FCC’s net neutrality rules
By Brian Fung March 12

The Federal Communications Commission has finally published its full net neutrality rules on its Web site. And they're not for the faint of heart. Together with the dissents from the agency's Republican commissioners, the document adds up to 400 pages.

http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,163
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #114 on: March 14, 2015, 01:30:27 AM »
FCC TO SEIZE ENTIRE INTERNET, CABLE SPECTRUM UNDER 400-PAGE “RULES”
FCC cherry picking existing laws for cable, radio & broadband to regulate Internet

http://www.infowars.com/fcc-to-seize-cable-tv-broadband-regulations-for-internet-takeover/

The FCC is combining several separate sections of telecommunications law developed for radio, cable TV and broadband access for a regulatory takeover of the Internet and is enforcing it with the same rules and methods as the Justice Department, according to its 400-page report released Thursday.

FULL REPORT
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline Letsbereal

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #115 on: March 14, 2015, 07:33:19 AM »
FCC Takeover Of Internet Confirmed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bInYszll358

Mar 13, 2015 TheAlexJonesChannel

Here are the FCC's new net neutrality rules http://www.dailydot.com/politics/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-released/?tw=dd
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline jerryweaver

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,430
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #116 on: March 14, 2015, 09:36:22 AM »
I think the cat is out of the bag. So now the goobermints are going to try to close the bag. Hahahahaha



Offline Letsbereal

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #117 on: March 16, 2015, 12:49:54 PM »
Net Neutrality Goes to Court: A Guide to the Internet's Legal Fate - The lawsuits against the FCC's Open Internet rules could arrive this week
16 March 2015
, by Joshua Brustein (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-16/net-neutrality-goes-to-court-a-guide-to-the-internet-s-legal-fate

Excerpt:

When the Federal Communications Commission published the full text of its Open Internet rules last week, it set off the final countdown toward legal assault that has been inevitable for months.

The lawsuits can begin once the rules are published in the Federal Register, which should happen as soon as this week, setting off what both supporters and critics of the FCC hope will be the last chapter in a decade-long struggle over federal regulation of the Internet.

Lawyers for the opponents—mostly large telecoms and their trade organizations—are currently poring over the 300-plus pages of rules looking for the basis of their lawsuits.

The anti-FCC forces won't say exactly what strategy they will take.

“Given the order’s many glaring legal flaws, they will have plenty of fodder,” predicted FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai in his official dissent.

Here's a guide to the legal case against the FCC's new rules.
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,337
    • The Great Deception
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #118 on: March 18, 2015, 03:58:22 PM »
FCC Chairman Wheeler Concedes Future Internet Tax Is Possible After All (READ IT ON PG 326 OF THE 400 PG FCC DOCUMENT)
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showtopic=8361&st=0#entry22044060
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Online TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,760
Re: THE END OF INTERNET: US Proposes Pay-for-priority Internet Standards
« Reply #119 on: March 18, 2015, 04:05:04 PM »
So is Congress powerless in legislating the creature they created ? the FCC?
So - Don't throw them in that briar patch?

it seems roles are reversed and the bureaucracy (fcc) is the congress and congress is the bureaucracy
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5