Extremely graphic footage: Libyan children killed by NATO bombs

[Letsbereal]

Extremely graphic footage: Libyan children killed by NATO bombs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYKY2F8jy4U

[Freeski]

Extremely graphic footage: Libyan children killed by NATO bombs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYKY2F8jy4U

I'm not going to look at it but I can tell you that if this were printed in every newspaper, talked about on radio station and shown on every TV network, you would see the overnight collapse of the Military Industrial Complex or whatever the hell you want to call it, along with the whole freaking New World Order! I can't stand cruel and insensitive people.

[fradus]

I dont think you would Freeski - and thats the problem.

[Freeski]

I dont think you would Freeski - and thats the problem.

Meaning what exactly?

[Protean]

I don't want to watch it either.  I do not want to watch children (or anyone) being killed/graphic footage, etc.

Never-the-less, thank you, LetsBeReal, for posting it.

Bottom line, what Freeski says is true:

"if this were printed in every newspaper, talked about on radio station and shown on every TV network, you would see the overnight collapse of the Military Industrial Complex or whatever the hell you want to call it, along with the whole freaking New World Order!"

The mindless left-lib kool aiders that voted for Soetoro are the new war mongers, the new nazi-neocons-- they are killing civilians in mass under the guise of humanitarianism. I ask them, what do you have to say about all these wars under Obama, he has more wars raging than Bush did. The Obama believers do not have an answer. A funny little smile comes over their face and they say "well war is not good..., but..." They don't have a clue.

As Webster Tarpley says, the left-libs aren't against war, they are just against Bush.

[able]

i force myself to watch these vids when they come up as they remind me that we face people who care little for human suffering and in times of doubt i recall those dead eyes staring at me calling from beyond the grave for me to be a man and avenge them. the people who order the bombs dropped should have their victims photos pasted on the ceilings above their beds so they are the first and last thing they see everyday and also be forced to go to every single funeral.

[Dig]

Blowing Up Babies in Libya is Great News For Raytheon
http://alfidicapitalblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/tomahawk-strike-on-libya-great-news-for.html
Sunday, March 20, 2011

Whoever said war is bad for business never worked for a defense contractor.  The international community has begun launching strikes on Muammar Gaddhafi's regime to prevent further atrocities.  That in itself is great news.  The U.S. won't take the lead but its edge in specialty weapons comes into play early.  The allies have fired over 100 Tomahawk cruise missiles to knock out Libyan air defense systems.  This will require spent inventories to be replenished.  That's great news for Raytheon, the Tomahawk's contractor. 

The Tomahawk reportedly costs $756k a copy.  RTN can thus expect new orders for at least $76mm later this year as soon as the relevant procurement commands generate their requirement statements.  The company will have to wait until the battle damage assessment photos are declassified before it can use the results in its advertisements.  War is hell, but you can't make money in hell like you can in war.

[Dig]

Blowing Up Babies in Libya is Great News For Raytheon
http://alfidicapitalblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/tomahawk-strike-on-libya-great-news-for.html
Sunday, March 20, 2011

THE RAYTHEON CONSPIRACY TO BLOW UP BABIES ALL OVER THE WORLD:
William Lynn III is a Top Raytheon Lobbyist
and
Obama's Deputy Secretary of Defense

Obama Nominee For Control Over Weapons is Raytheon Lobbyist
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2009/01/president_barack_obamas_strict.html
POSTED: 01:03 PM ET, 01/23/2009 by Derek Kravitz

President Barack Obama's strict new lobbying rules for cabinet members have put his administration in a difficult spot when it comes to one of its top nominees. William J. Lynn III, a former Pentagon official under President Bill Clinton and Obama's choice for deputy secretary of the Defense Department, spent the better part of the past two years lobbying for defense contractor Raytheon, federal records show. Obama's ethics rules state that ex-lobbyists in his administration cannot work on issues they lobbied on for two years:

"2. Revolving Door Ban All Appointees Entering Government. I will not for a period of 2 years from the date of my appointment participate in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my former employer or former clients, including regulations and contracts.

"3. Revolving Door Ban Lobbyists Entering Government. If I was a registered lobbyist within the 2 years before the date of my appointment, in addition to abiding by the limitations of paragraph 2, I will not for a period of 2 years after the date of my appointment:

(a) participate in any particular matter on which I lobbied within the 2 years before the date of my appointment;
(b) participate in the specific issue area in which that particular matter falls; or
(c) seek or accept employment with any executive agency that I lobbied within the 2 years before the date of my appointment.

That rule complicates matters for Lynn. It also affects William V. Coor, the nominee for deputy secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services, who has lobbied for the nonprofit Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. But Coor has pledged not to work on any tobacco issues in his new job. Lynn, however, lobbied the Pentagon on so many Raytheon projects -- acquisitions policy, space, intelligence and command and control, among others -- that it might be hard to find an area within the department that was untouched by his previous work.

2009-             Dept of Defense, Obama               Deputy Secretary of Defense
2002-2008   Raytheon Co    Lobbyist
2001-2002   DFI International                           Exec VP
1997-2001   Dept of Defense, Clinton                Undersec (Comptroller)
1993-1997   Dept of Defense, Clinton                Dir, Prgrm Analysis & Evaluation
1987-1993   Kennedy, Edward M                       Legislative Counsel
1985-1986   Institute for Defense                      Analyses Prof Staff   
1982-1985   Center for Strategic & Intl Studies    Exec Dir, Defense Project
http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/rev_summary.php?id=31517

COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
The age of nations is over.
The United States is Dead.
The new age has begun.
BY PARAG KHANNA | SEPT. / OCT. 2010
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/08/16/beyond_city_limits

The 21st century will not be dominated by America or China, Brazil or India, but by the city. In an age that appears increasingly unmanageable, cities rather than states are becoming the islands of governance on which the future world order will be built. This new world is not -- and will not be -- one global village, so much as a network of different ones.

Time, technology, and population growth have massively accelerated the advent of this new urbanized era. Already, more than half the world lives in cities, and the percentage is growing rapidly. But just 100 cities account for 30 percent of the world's economy, and almost all its innovation. Many are world capitals that have evolved and adapted through centuries of dominance: London, New York, Paris. New York City's economy alone is larger than 46 of sub-Saharan Africa's economies combined. Hong Kong receives more tourists annually than all of India. These cities are the engines of globalization, and their enduring vibrancy lies in money, knowledge, and stability. They are today's true Global Cities.

Columbia University scholar Saskia Sassen has done the most to contribute to our thinking about how urban advantage translates into grand strategy. As she writes in The Global City, such places are uniquely suited to translate their productive power into "the practice of global control." Her academic work has traced how Europe's largely autonomous Renaissance cities such as Bruges and Antwerp innovated the legal frameworks that enabled the first transnational stock exchanges, setting the stage for international credit and the forerunners of today's trading networks. Then as now, nations and empires did not restrain cities; they were merely filters for cities' global ambitions. The supply chains and capital flows linking global cities today have similarly denationalized international relations. As Sassen argues, in cities we can't make trite divisions between the government and private sector; either they work together or the city doesn't work at all. Even massive national investments in telecommunications or other infrastructure don't equalize the balance of power between cities and the rest; they ultimately reinforce the power of cities to conduct their own "sovereign" diplomacy.

Just like clockwork...32% of US Tax funded weapons systems can now be sold to enemies of the sovereignty of the United States of America thanks to Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski
(don't anyone dare blame the bullshit failed Soetoro puppet for this one - he does not have the power to do this and everybody knows it)

Council on Foreign Relations moves to remake US weapons controls
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Obama_moves_to_remake_US_weapons_co_08302010.html
Published: Monday August 30, 2010

President Barack Obama will on Tuesday move to reform US export rules, hoping to boost trade while hampering the sale of sensitive technology. Capping a year-long review of weapons controls, Obama will tell a Washington non-proliferation conference that previous rules were fractured, making it difficult for some legitimate firms to do business. "These reforms will focus our resources on the threats that matter most," Obama said in recorded video remarks. "They'll help us not just increase exports and create jobs, but strengthen our national security as well." The reforms will include more specific definitions of goods that need export licenses and restructuring how requests are dealt with. The move is expected to result in around 32 percent of items on the munitions list being "decontrolled."

Pentagon may apply preemptive warfare policy to the Internet
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/0829/pentagon-weighs-applying-preemptive-warfare-tactics-internet/
By Stephen C. Webster
Sunday, August 29th, 2010 -- 11:39 pm


Grappling with matters of law and policy governing the United States military's cyber-warfare capabilities, Pentagon planners are eying ways of making preemptive strikes across the Internet part of America's toolbox. In a piece for Foreign Affairs, the publication of globalist policy group The Council on Foreign Relations, Deputy Secretary of Defense William J. Lynn III paints a picture of dire threat to American infrastructure, disclosing for the first time details of a devastating cyber-attack on U.S. infrastructure. While not giving many specifics, Lynn described how malicious code on a USB thumb drive managed to spread across the Department of Defense network, establishing a "digital beachhead" that could siphon key data. "It was a network administrator's worst fear: a rogue program operating silently, poised to deliver operational plans into the hands of an unknown adversary," he wrote. "This previously classified incident was the most significant breach of U.S. military computers ever, and it served as an important wake-up call. The Pentagon's operation to counter the attack, known as Operation Buckshot Yankee, marked a turning point in U.S. cyberdefense strategy." However, "Operation Buchshot Yankee," commenced in 2008 and lasting some 14 months, saw the Department of Defense scramble over what was essentially a very minor security threat that caught their network experts completely by surprise.

CFR has issued the directive. THIS IS A ROCKEFELLER INITIATIVE!!!!!!!!!!! Coming out next month: OCTOBER SURPRISE:

Defending a New Domain
The Pentagon's Cyberstrategy
By William J. Lynn III
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66552/william-j-lynn-iii/defending-a-new-domain

Summary:  Right now, more than 100 foreign intelligence organizations are trying to hack into the digital networks that undergird U.S. military operations. The Pentagon recognizes the catastrophic threat posed by cyberwarfare, and is partnering with allied governments and private companies to prepare itself.

In 2008, the U.S. Department of Defense suffered a significant compromise of its classified military computer networks. It began when an infected flash drive was inserted into a U.S. military laptop at a base in the Middle East. The flash drive's malicious computer code, placed there by a foreign intelligence agency, uploaded itself onto a network run by the U.S. Central Command. That code spread undetected on both classified and unclassified systems, establishing what amounted to a digital beachhead, from which data could be transferred to servers under foreign control. It was a network administrator's worst fear: a rogue program operating silently, poised to deliver operational plans into the hands of an unknown adversary.

This previously classified incident was the most significant breach of U.S. military computers ever, and it served as an important wake-up call. The Pentagon's operation to counter the attack, known as Operation Buckshot Yankee, marked a turning point in U.S. cyberdefense strategy.  Over the past ten years, the frequency and sophistication of intrusions into U.S. military networks have increased exponentially. Every day, U.S. military and civilian networks are probed thousands of times and scanned millions of times. And the 2008 intrusion that led to Operation Buckshot Yankee was not the only successful penetration. Adversaries have acquired thousands of files from U.S. networks and from the networks of U.S. allies and industry partners, including weapons blueprints, operational plans, and surveillance data.

As the scale of cyberwarfare's threat to U.S. national security and the U.S. economy has come into view, the Pentagon has built layered and robust defenses around military networks and inaugurated the new U.S. Cyber Command to integrate cyberdefense operations across the military. The Pentagon is now working with the Department of Homeland Security to protect government networks and critical infrastructure and with the United States' closest allies to expand these defenses internationally. An enormous amount of foundational work remains, but the U.S. government has begun putting in place various initiatives to defend the United States in the digital age.

THE THREAT ENVIRONMENT

[chris jones]

 Bombs do not discriminate, men, woman, children, infants, and any other living creature in their kill radius.
 Its been said the photos would not have an impact, no effect, then why aren't they made public? They have been told to protect the publics sensabilitys, NO simply taking orders.MSM- THEY'RE OWNED.
 Where are our jounalists, the true breed of investigative journalists are long gone. The effect of imagery is staggering, the globalists are aware of this and have made it SOP to controll it. The truth has been banned and replaced with illusions.
 Bombs, I will never forget sweeping a village after B52 bomb run, a father was holding the body parts and bloody rags of his daughters to his chest. He looked strait into my eyes, his mouth was open as if to scream but no a sound came out. The IMAGE haunts me, America needs to see up close the reality of WAR. Fact, they are not allowed to, it may just wake the people.
 

[Femacamper]

That's terrible beyond belief. It parallels our global mass murder of children by abortion.

[Geolibertarian]

Libyan children killed by NATO bombs

But those were cute, cuddly "humanitarian" bombs, so that makes it okay.

Right, Obamanoids?  

[Geolibertarian]

http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2011/08/10/obama-on-pace-to-surpass-bush-in-war-casualties-where-are-the-antiwar-protests/

Obama on Pace to Surpass Bush in War Casualties: Where Are the Antiwar Protests?

posted at 6:23 pm on August 10, 2011 by Howard Portnoy

Remember the anti-war rallies when George W. Bush was president? Organizers sometimes claimed turnouts in the tens of thousands. Protesters carried clever signs reading “Support the Troops: End the War” or posters of the president as Hitler, the devil, or—in one artful effort—as both. (So much for the left’s professed civility.)

The media did its part to emphasize the war-is-hell aspect of the campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan by running footage of slain soldiers’ coffins being unloaded from cargo planes at U.S. air bases. Lest there be any confusion or short memories of just how intense, and uncivil, these protests became, a stroll down memory lane via this slideshow should suffice as a reminder.

That was then. And this is now. And now one scarcely hears a peep from the anti-war protesters, despite a disconcerting observation by Ira Stoll at reason.com, who writes:

The Obama administration is on pace to have more American soldiers killed in casualties related to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan than the George W. Bush administration did in its first term.

Citing the website iCasualties.org, which maintains data on military personnel killed in action, Stoll notes the sobering specifics:

630 American soldiers died in the Afghanistan operation in the years 2001 through 2008, when Mr. Bush was president, while 1097 American soldiers have died in the years 2009, 2010, and 2011.

Not to mention, the president has added a third war—in Libya—which, despite his early predictions of U.S. involvement being measured in days has dragged on for months. The war has cost American taxpayers $60 million a month since the bombing began in March, but it has been even more costly in terms of human lives.

So the question logically arises: Where are the marchers and demonstrators now? Why aren’t they out picketing in front of the White House, holding aloft posters of Barack Obama with a noose around his neck? (Oh, that’s right…)

Stoll posed questions like these to Michael McPhearson, national coordinator of United for Peace and Justice, which organized some of the largest antiwar protests during the Bush administration. The explanation he gave is simple: It’s all political partisanship:

Once Obama got into office, they kind of demobilized themselves.

Because he’s a Democrat, they don’t want to oppose him in the same way as they opposed Bush. The politics of it allows him more breathing room when it comes to the wars.

In other words, the protests were nothing more than demonstrations of liberal hypocrisy. Suprised?

[chris jones]

 They play the people like a worn out violin.
Let me take a guess Geo, some folks have most likely called you a cynic, well bless your heart if this has happened, so too were our forefathers.
 Today's world needs realists, they may declare our breed cynical, I prefer to think of it as a badge of honesty surrounded by honour.

[Satyagraha]

http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2011/08/10/obama-on-pace-to-surpass-bush-in-war-casualties-where-are-the-antiwar-protests/

Obama on Pace to Surpass Bush in War Casualties: Where Are the Antiwar Protests?

The progressive liberal antiwar protestors got their man into office then went home and turned on MSNBC.

But they're realizing that they were lied to; perhaps part of what is stirring up more antiwar sentiments these days.
In reaction to that, we're seeing more propaganda about those 'jihadis' (those MI6, NATO, CIA, Blackwater/Xe, jihadis in fact), in an effort to rekindle American bloodlust. More threats to Christians! More threats to Israel! More threats, more fear, more war, more money, more death!

The only reason we had huge demonstrations against the war in Viet Nam was the DRAFT.
There is no draft now, so the number of people directly affected by these wars is reduced.
The one good thing about the draft is that it's a forced wakeup call to America: if we brought back the draft, we'd see people out in the streets protesting the wars.

That's why the NWO will not reinstitute the draft. They'll use propaganda to keep the wars going. They're having success with that.

[chris jones]

The only reason we had huge demonstrations against the war in Viet Nam was the DRAFT.
There is no draft now, so the number of people directly affected by these wars is reduced.

Saty. Just my opinion. The regime has made enemies globally, genocide, torture,illegal imprisonment and illegal invasion leave their mark, the nurturing of perpetual war.
 Odd isn't it that obmama and Hillary discussed national service while still presidential campaining. The issue was American citizens serving their nation domestically or in the military ( the word DRAFT ) of course was avoided. Peace is contrary to their plan, its obvious.
 The draft, MSM coverage (imagery-not fairy tales) worked in waking up the people, that is the lesson the elites learned. They have made certain they didn't make this mistake again. When and if national service begins it will just be a different label for DRAFT- the elites wil insure this and survival will initiate it.

[Satyagraha]

They have made certain they didn't make this mistake again. When and if national service begins it will just be a different label for DRAFT- the elites wil insure this and survival will initiate it.

Good point Chris; they are waiting, perhaps for round2 of Obama, before pushing the 'national service' program.