Obama Nation is an investigation relating to the constitutional requirements for the presidency of the United States Republic. This report will show substantial evidence supporting the claims that President Barack Hussein Obama is currently serving office unconstitutionally. This report will show why Congress should start impeachment trails against Obama for his acts of treason against this country.
Constitutional Requirements for President:
Section I of Article II of the United States Constitution: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident with the United States.
This investigation will show three different independent case scenarios ranging from all three different sides of constitutional eligibility arguments. These three scenarios will show that President Barack Hussein Obama isn’t legally able to obtain the office of presidency. This news article posted by the N.M.T.O. staff will prove beyond a reasonable doubt that in all three cases of constitutional interpretation, Mr. Obama should be removed immediately from office due to his unconstitutional status he holds.
CHAPTER ONE: (Section I of Article II Requires Only an Individual to be Birthed on U.S. Soil?)
CASE SCENARIO NUMBER 1:
In order for anyone individual to run for the oval-office, he/she must be the minimum age of 35 and have been a resident for at least 14 years of the United States, while being born on United States soil? This argument is heavily supported by the ongoing BIRTHER MOVEMENT. This movement is desperately trying to prove that President Obama is not “Truly” born in his birth place of Hawaii as he claims. Nationwide birther individuals claim he was born in his father’s country of Kenya. These individuals support the belief that Section I of Article II requires a person to be born within the confinements of the States and/or at least U.S. territory minimum (Example: Japanese U.S. Base and etc.). If Obama was however truly born in Kenya as the ‘birthers’ claim, then Mr. Obama knowingly has committed treason against our constitutional republic.
The problem however with the BIRTHER MOVEMENT, is that they and society at large, hasn’t looked into the legal definition relating to “NATURAL” status. This article will now brake down the official definition of “NATURAL” and what is required for a citizen to be eligible for presidency. 1. Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. 2. Those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. 3. The country of the father is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens. 4. In order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only that place of his birth, and not his country. We must now also look up the definition of the word “NATIVE”: The word native is described as – geographical. A primary example of this is Indians. When our founders of this country moved here, American Indians already had birth rights over our territory (land). That is why our society categorizes Indians under the phrase “American Indians”. Their native land (geographical) is the U.S. shores. Thus the American people need to come to the realization that any individual born on United States soil is a “native” automatically by legal definition. We need to also understand that this doesn’t give the same emphasis to being a “NATURAL citizen”. A natural born citizen child is one who is born of parents that are citizens of America. Those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their inheritance (rights). These are the terms of being an automatic natural citizen. The A Voice in the Wilderness has a good article explaining further in depth this argument. Link: http://a-voice.org/portions/04-30-11.htm
This V.W. article also touches on the issues relating to biblical terms for Christian citizenship in Gods Kingdom (Heaven). The article goes on to tell us that a person’s father gives him his natural birthright citizenship under the “Law of Nations”.
According to the Law of Nations which is predated to the founding legal principles of our constitutional society, the founders of this republic, made it unmistakably clear, that the father granted rights to his children within our territory. The founding fathers made this a key principle for one main rational reason. They understood the threat of monarchy power and how a monarch could potentially over-throw the Constitutional American government. Without this added protection of Section I of Article II pertaining to our U.S. Constitution, the sovereignty of the United States could be at risk. The founders feared the possible threat that a monarch royalty could bare a child with a female U.S. citizen, who then, as the child came of age, could someday help grow his fathers kingdom (empire). This threat is a highly probable possibility considering that this nations fathers lived under the British tyrannical crown of England. Historically former kings would have their children reproduced their offspring’s to other nations. This international entanglement (allegiances) would help grow empires and inter-twine their headship over the general common folks of societies.
Now since we have looked into this side of interpretation to this constitutional crisis, this would then disqualify President Barack Hussein Obama from the oval-office. Barack’s father the 1st, was not a natural born citizen, but was a native citizen of Kenya. At the time of Barack’s birth, Kenya was under the legal ownership of the British parliament. This pickle Obama has put this nation under is indeed the biggest constitutional disaster this country has ever had. Could you imagine the nationwide epidemic of a national cry of racism this would bring upon our central government if Congress would start an impeachment trail on our first dark skin American president? I firmly believe this backlash would most likely result in a civil war regardless of the true nature of the constitutional interpretation of our supreme law (The United States Constitution). But to get back to this point of this news article, about those definitions relating to “NATURAL & NATIVE” terms, we should have then come to the logical conclusion that one’s birth is inherited by his/her’s father. We then understand that Obama is not able to legally be our president. This would even conclude the fact that it wouldn’t matter if Obama was born in Hawaii or on the planet of Mars. The problem with the birther movement is it is asking the wrong question. Although an important question. (Where’s the birth certificate?), birthers should be asking what is the legal definition to be a “natural” citizen?
Since we have looked into this side of interpretation to this constitutional crisis, while understanding the Laws of Nations, showing that a child inherits its rights from his father, could the general PRO-Obama-Knights argue Barack’s constitutional eligibility since his mother was an American citizen by birth right herself?
The Answer is NO…But to help stop the feminist outcry of sexism pertaining to this news article, we should mention clearly that Obama’s mother, although 18 when she labored our president’s birth, could “NOT STATUTORILY CONFER NATURAL BORN” status LEGALLY, even though she could marry and enlist into our military. Why you might question (
). Simply because she could NOT VOTE at the time. In the 1960’s a person couldn’t vote until the minimum age of 21.
Reference Links from the A Voice in the Wilderness Article:
PRESS LIES ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY GET LOUDERhttp://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams146.htm
OBAMA CONFIRMS – NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZENhttp://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams147.htm
CHAPTER TWO: (Barack Hussein Obama Committed Birth Certificate Forgery?)
CASE SCENARIO NUMBER 2:
This second scenario will now show conclusive evidence that Barack’s supposedly legal birth documentation is indeed a forgery. If this is a fraudulent document, then his crimes should be legally held in a trial for treason against him and all of his co-conspirators. This scenario will now break down the evidence presented by nationwide birther advocates across this country. To START, please take note, that Obama and his mobsters (administration and corporate media elite) are diligently working hard to censor and control the evidence that is pumped through the massive control-grid media we are seeing from the truth-tube (a.k.a. television, and corporate sponsored populist radio shows, newspapers, and websites). To understand this control-grid virtual pipeline, we recommend all readers to buy the book titled: The New Media Monopoly, (Author: Ben H. Bagdikian).
This N.M.T.O. Investigation Now Begins: During the 2008 election campaign, Senator Obama at the time, published a C.O.L.B. (certification of live birth) on his official campaign website. This certification of live birth was only a “receipt” of his “supposed birth certificate – (the long-form)”. After Obama was elected to the White House, the liberal media was desperately lying and covering-up the real questions which related to his C.O.L.B. document. For two years the media at large was indoctrinating the general public that this certification of live birth was indeed the legal birth certificate that Hawaii has on file. The well crafted control-grid media outlets labeled individuals to be conspiracy theorist nut-jobs if they challenged/debated this C.O.L.B. documentation. Luckily in America however, we still have true loving constitutional patriots that demanded answers to this C.O.L.B. Those nationwide ‘nut-jobs’ patriots were growing by the masses. On April 27 2011, President Barack Obama finally went public and relinquished his “SUPPOSEDLY” long-form birth certificate on the official website of the White House. Link: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate
. Shortly after this long-form release of Obama’s birth documentation, Mox News (Fox News), and other conservative media outlets, now agree with the overall liberal side, which claim he was born in the State of Hawaii. The left/right pyramid paradigm of the control-grid that our media elites love playing on the populist is working once again with all the sheeple still being brainwashed from our corporatist fascist leaders. Case closed the control-grid tells us.
Is this case really closed? Is there an agenda behind this administration? Why did it take Obama three years to produce his long-form B.C.? Why did the media diligently work hard against the birthers’ claims? I smell an old nasty fish in Washington and you should too.
So while investigating the first release of Barack’s certification of live birth (the C.O.L.B.), which is only a receipt, we at N.M.T.O. have come to the conclusion that this document shouldn’t have been accepted by the D.N.C. – Democratic National Committee when Obama ran in the 08 elections. Why? Well because when President Obama, at the time Senator Obama, released this document, it was only a copy from a computerized scan. The D.N.C. didn’t even investigate this receipt. The D.N.C. members overall probably didn’t even care if Obama produced his long-form B.C. document before even allowing him to run for the oval-office! Well at least that is what it seems to be. But sadly because of our nations failure to request such proof, this has inspired for years the birther movement individuals claims that even a non-born child could receive this same C.O.L.B. document. It turns out that this claim is completely true. Under Hawaiian legal status: “(A) Upon application of an adult or the legal parent of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child. (B) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate. (C) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by the rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. (L. 1982, c 192, §1)”
So PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: You see, as long as an adult can walk into Hawaii’s Department of Records and provide proof, that they (parents/adult) are legal resident of Hawaii, regardless of the birthplace, Hawaii can file for a certification of live birth (a C.O.L.B.). This information came to our sources from the following online reference link: http://freedomedium.com/2009/07/birth-certificate-vs-certification-of-live-birth/
Another RED FLAG was how much money Obama has spent in the last three years in a variety of nationwide lawsuits seeking for the release of his actual long-form birth certificate and other public documents that could essentially prove either A: Obama’s unconstitutional falsehood of his presidency, or B: Obama’s absolute legal constitutional standing for his presidency. President Barack however has chosen to outwardly to deny to the public and/or at least the Federal Congress to see any key documents that could prove his innocence to our elected body of representatives. According to a W.N.D. – World Net Daily news article, it claims that the Obama administration has paid large amounts of money towards all of these nationwide lawsuits. W.N.D. Link: http://wnd.com/?pageId=114202#ixzz1IrRSoSUt
. Question (
) Why didn’t Mr. Obama release his birth certificate while running in 2008, or at least shortly after the election? His administration would have saved a large amount of money. This non rational reasoning is mind-boggling to myself and many other patriots of our country. If that isn’t an eye opener to you, then here is another interesting peace of evidence that was reported by W.N.D.
In a World Net Daily news post, a U.S. Army Reserve major from Florida was scheduled to report for deployment to Afghanistan. This military personnel however demanded proof from his higher superiors that President Obama could constitutionally order him to serve over seas. His lawsuit filed with his attorney, Orly Taitz, confirmed to the W.N.D. staff that the military has rescinded his impending deployment orders. Please read this eye shocking news article. Link: http://wnd.com/?pageId=104009
Why? Because even the United States military couldn’t confirm Obama’s legal ‘natural born’ status.
PLEASE ALSO TAKE NOTICE: From that same link relating to the military U.S. Army Reserve major from Florida – Gives a detailed list of the past/current lawsuit litigation’s Obama is currently facing. We highly recommend all of our news post readers to look at the obtaining lists of various lawsuits.
Now let us continue our investigation and head straight into the documents (C.O.L.B. & the C.O.B.) – That President Obama himself has willfully published for the general public to see.
President Barack Obama’s Certification of Live Birth
For Higher Resolution: Click Here to Download (C.O.L.B.)
President Barack Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth
For Higher Resolution: Click Here to Download (C.O.B.)
Although the above following birth certification/certificate that has been routinely criticized by many conspiracy theorists that the C.O.L.B. & C.O.B.’s presented by President Obama are supposedly fraudulent documents, (Including several Adobe software experts themselves), I want to first mention to the N.M.T.O. readers that I am not a specialist relating to this issue pertaining to those accusations, and nor would I even dare to claim to be such a specialist. I will however try to break-down some of the conspiratorial accusations out on the internet.
Certification of Live Birth: (Obama’s C.O.L.B.)
Although Obama released his supposedly C.O.L.B. document during the 2008 elections, which nationwide birthers have claimed is a fraudulent paper, I am not going to focus on this C.O.L.B. fraudulent evidence from pass accusations. I will instead provide a link that one can cross-reference themselves. The purpose of the article, from N.M.T.O., is to focus on the main document that President Obama released recently, his long-form B.C.
C.O.L.B. Reference Link: http://israelstreams.com/?israelinsider.html?http://israelinsider.com/Articles1/Politics/12939.htm
Here is one link from many past news articles published from the corporate media outlets trying to continuously lie about the C.O.L.B. being the only document available. The media control-grid vigorously tried indoctrinating the general public, that the C.O.L.B. was the “Only Birth Certificate” that the State of Hawaii published. Corporate media has however changed its tune with the newest lie. Link: http://www.lebanonwire.com/0907MLN/09072716TGR.asp
Certificate of Live Birth:
ACCUSATION NUMBER ONE:
A news article from World Net Daily posted on April 27th, 2011 at 9:58 pm Eastern by Jerome Corsi reported, that two twins have lower certificate numbers than the number given Obama’s birth certificate. The problem with this issue, is that the president was born at the same hospital a day earlier than the Nordykes twins. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5th, 1961, and was given a certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug 11th, 1961. The second twin, Gretchen Nordyke, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5th, 1961, that certificate No. was 151 – 61 – 10638. This certificate numbers was filed on the same day. President Barack Obama’s number is 151 – 61 – 10641. In 1961, birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals. The Hawaii Department of Health stamped the birth records at the main office in Honolulu. (Note: This was the only place birth certificate numbers were assigned). During the final process, the B.C.’s were accepted by the registrar general, with the date of registration inserted in box No. 22 on the lower right hand corner of the long-form birth certificate. Also Note: The date the long-forms were accepted by the registrar general was the same date the birth certificate number was stamped on the birth record. The interesting thing with this situation, was the fact, that all birth certificate numbers were implanted on the form by a rubber stamp that “automatically” increased by one each time a birth certificate was stamped. The question that Obama and/or the state officials of Hawaii should answer, is how was it possible that the Nordyke twins had their birth ceritifcates accepted by the registrar general in Hawaii “THREE DAYS LATER” than the registrar general accepted Obama’s birth certificate, when the twin’s numbers are lower than Obama’s number?
The W.N.D. article further states: Eleanor Nordyke has speculated that her twins received an earlier B.C. number because, although she gave birth later than Obama’s mother: Ann Dunham, she entered Kapi’olani earlier. Yet, in 1961, birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals, and the date the mother checked into the medicial facility was “IRRELEVANT” to how birth certificate numbers were assigned. Also Take Notice: No records for Dunham having been a patient at Kapi’olani in 1961, or of President Obama having been born at the hospital on Aug. 4th, 1961, have been released by the hospital. W.N.D. Link: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=292457
BARACK H. OBAMA’S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FILE NUMBER
THE NORDYKE TWINS LONG-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATES (NOTICE: THE FILE NUMBER)
ACCUSATION NUMBER TWO:
The Alex Jones syndicated (alternative) news radio broadcast, published a youtube video that briefly examines Obama’s birth certificate using the popular Adobe Illustrator editing software. This video is a must see for nin-high tech individuals. This video below will indeed show some interesting viewpoints that support the claims that this long-form B.C. is a fraudulent document.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIewAP_lGA0&feature=player_embedded
DID YOU CATCH SOME OF THE FOLLOWING KEY NOTES FROM THIS VIDEO?
Alex Jones, with his experts on Photoshop software showed a variety of interesting points that the American people should take into deep consideration. The biggest concern of Obama’s long-form birth certificate was all of the several layers that the Adobe Illustrator editing software showed. The administration did not even take the time to flatten the document out after scanning it into their computer. The layers on some of the signature even went over the green background. With this powerful editing software one could buy, any individual could see places where letters and numbers within the birth certificate were added/deleted. The Hawaiian Health Department numbers even had an added 1. All of this evidence, should start an open independent nonpartisan investigation. President Obama and his administration must believe the general public of our society is beyond and most stupidest population on earth. If we as a civilized country are going to believe this document is a legitimate birth certificate, then maybe we are truly this stupid. I hope not.
SUMMING IT UP:
So then what do we believe? Should we believe the first release with the Certification of Live Birth, that we were told was the only document available? Do we believe the recently released Long Form birth certificate, that is obviously a fake? Do we believe the newspaper article about M. Obama Illinois Senate seat, “stating he was born in Kenya”? Which the corporate control-grid censored and rebuttal the story – which they tell us was a misprint? Do we believe Mr. Obama’s grandmother who claims he was born in her village? Is the sky blue? Do skyscrapers freefall into their own footprint after being on fire a few hours? Is two plus two really four? As if the evidence in this accusation wasn’t enough to make anyone question the legitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama’s constitutional eligibility of the office of President, there is yet one more, very serious accusation.
Kenya-Born Obama U.S. Senate (Web Archive) Article
Kenya-Born Obama U.S. Senate (News Article from Infowars.com)
CHAPTER THREE: (The Smoking Gun)
CASE SCENARIO NUMBER 3:
Obama’s Indonesian Citizenship:
Chapter three is the final conclusion of Obama Nation. This chapter is indeed the most groundbreaking research pertaining to this entire news article. Scenario 1: was the understanding of the Law of Nations and the definitions of natural and native. Scenario 2: was the realization that President Obama’s long-form birth certificate is a fraudulent document. This scenario 3: is relating to the overall study of the supposed Kenya birthplace and Barack’s Indonesia citizenship.
Philip J. Berg, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama on August 21st, 2008 challenging Obama’s lack of “Constitutionally Eilgibility” to serve as President of the United States, stated that Obama’s newly released long-form birth certificate is in need of serious examinations by top experts. Attorney Berg, has however continued to address that even if Obama was born in his claiming home of Hawaii, he couldn’t be president because of his adoption by his stepfather. Berg also mentions that he is receiving many calls claiming that Obama could not have lost his U.S. citizenship by his mother’s acts of expatriation. His reply to which he claims that although this is true, however, the “Act of 1940, revised 1952, Section 318(a) states, “A former citizen of the United States expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parents or parents who has NOT acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parents or parents may be naturalized upon filing petition for naturalization before reaching the age of twenty-five (25) years and upon compliance will all requirements of the naturalization laws with the following exceptions: (b) No former citizen of the United States, expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parent or parents shall be obliged to comply with the requirements of the immigration laws, if he was not acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parents or parents, and if he has come or shall come to the United States before reaching the age of twenty-five years. (c) After his naturalization such person shall have the same citizenship status as if he had not been expatriated.”
Philip J. Berg continues by informing us that Obama renewed an Indonesian Passport at the age of 18. This Passport renewal would have legally been an affirmative act. This is because Obama legally would have sworn allegiance to another Country. Barack H. Obama II, renewed his Indonesian Passport when he traveled to Pakistan and that is why Berg claims he had to stop in Indonesia first, which is recorded in Obama’s book: “Dreams from my father”. Philip J Berg, mentions the fact, that Obama’s mother, Dunham was filing for divorce at this time. Obama himself however claims his traveled to Indonesia was in part to visit with his mother. Berg’s discovery has mentioned, that Mrs. Dunham (The mother of Obama), couldn’t have been in Indonesia. She was at the time in process for filing for a divorce from Lolo Soetoro. In his research, the State Department has confirmed to Philip J. Berg in a respond to an F.O.I.A. (Freedom of Information Act) request, that the department doesn’t have a U.S. Passport application on file for Barack H. Obama. In a further investigation, Berg said, “Despite the above F.O.I.A., Indonesia required Obama to do a bit more upon his 18th birthday. In fact the Indonesian law gives until the age of Twenty-One (21). Thusly Obama would have had to sign an Affidavit relinquishing his Indonesian citizenship and sent an affidavit to the Indonesian Government before reclaiming any U.S. citizenship he may have “once” held. Berg also informs us that when it comes to the citizenship of individuals in other countries, we are prevented from interfering due to the Hague Convention of 1930. During the late 60’s all the way up until 2006, Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship. In 2006, Indonesia changed their laws to permit dual citizenship; during this new law, Indonesia has had its battles with enforcing their new permitting dual citizenship. The United States also will only grant dual citizenship if both countries are in agreement to all dual citizenship laws.
Philip J. Berg, claims in his lawsuit, that Barack Hussein Obama must have been an Indonesian citizen. He claims: when Obama was approximately four (4) years old his parents divorced and thereafter, Obama’s mother Stanley Ann Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia. Evidence points to the fact that Lolo Soetoro, either signed a government form legally ‘acknowledging’ Obama as his son or adopted Soetoro, either of which changed any citizenship Obama had to a “natural” citizen of Indonesia. In his investigation, it was discovered, that at the time, while Obama attended school in Indonesia, all students were required to carry government identity cards or Kartu Tanda Pendudaks, as well as family identification card called a Kartu Keluarga. The Kartu Keluarga is a family card which bears the legal names and citizenship status of all family members. It is on record that Obama was registered in a public school as an Indonesian citizen by the name of Barry Soetoro and his father was listed as Lolo Soetoro M.A. according to the Indonesian school records. The major problem with this, is simply that Indonesia did NOT allow foreign students to attend their public schools in the late 1960’s or 1970’s and any time a child was registered for a public school, the child’s name and citizenship status were verified through the Indonesian Government. Under the Constitution of the republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Chapter 13, Law No. 62 of 1958 (all citizens of Indonesia have the right to education). There was no way for Obama to have attended school in Jakarta, Indonesia legally unless he was an Indonesian citizen, as Indonesia under tight rule was a Police State. These facts, Berg states, prove therefore he is not eligible to be President of the United States. Under the Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son, in this case Soetoro/Obama, an Indonesian State citizen. (Reference: the Constitution of Indonesia Republic, Law No. 62 of 1958 concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie).
Philip J. Berg Reference Link: http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1505
To conclude the matter of the Obama-Nation article we must assert that it is impossible for Barack Obama (Barry Soetoro) to be eligible for the office of the President of the United States. Even if Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, as he claims, his father was never a citizen of the United States, thus he is ineligible for that office. Despite the fact that there are several anomalies in his presented C.O.L.B and Long-Form B.C., even if he were to prove that indeed these were true documents, we would still be left with the Indonesian citizenship problem. While it may be that Mr. Obama is a legal citizen of the US, he certainly is not eligible for Presidency. It is just as likely that he is an illegal citizen, or alien, of the US. There are many other questions raised by patriots including whether or not he or his family worked for the CIA. There are issues with his Social Security number. There are even issues with his college/university records, including a scholarship that he received that was for foreigners only.
The article by N.M.T.O. could easily turn into a book if all of the issues surrounding Barack Hussein Obama were addressed. The purpose of this article is to show that no matter which way you look at it…it is undeniable that our current President is NOT ELIGIBLE. Case closed.
O.C.R. Video Information:
Please watch this 35 minute youtube video below. This video explains the process of the O.C.R. – Optical Character Recognition Software that the control-grid media outlets are claiming the Obama administration used when publishing his supposed long-form birth certificate.
Please Note: The Northern Michigan Truth Out team is also asking online computer junkies (A.K.A. – Highly Technological Graphic Experts) to continuously examine Obama’s long-form birth certificate. Please feel free to e-mail us anytime. (Just click the contact link in our menu section and e-mail us your comments). If you would like to share a video with us relating to this constitutional crisis, please give us the U.R.L. link and we will watch/investigate.http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZCjAmEgjkUc
Extra Side News Article Links:
The U.S. Government Is On Record Questioning Obama’s Citizenship Status As Early As When He Was 5 Years Old
U.S. Always Questioned Obama Citizenship
Kenya Investigated Obama’s African Birth?
Hawaii Shuts Out W.N.D. Probe of Obama Birth
Obama Birth Certificate Linked To Previous Forgery
4 Supreme Court Cases Define Natural Born Citizen – (Side Info on the 14th Amendment)
The Law of Nations (Book I, Chapter 19, § 212, of the English Translation of 1797 (See Page. 110) This article wasn't written by me, but my friend and owner co/operator of NMTO.org. This article can be posted anywhere, provided credit is given to nmto.org via a link.
Actually link to article with YouTube embeds: