Fascinating Debate-Arabs Don't Get It- CIA Is Behind Uprisings in M.E.(Tarpley)

[larsonstdoc]

  Video---Tarpley --They are duped like most Americans believing the MSM about these revolutions--both in the US and around the world.

     http://tarpley.net/

[larsonstdoc]

  One of the jerks says Tarpley is a conspiracy theorist and he applauds the Arab people for not believing the CIA conspiracy--unbelievable!!!
    The CIA wins if they don't believe the CIA isn't behind this. 

  We at Prison Planet Forum know who is behind this--the CIA/World Bank/IMF/etc.

[larsonstdoc]

  The Arabs are using that damn phrase again---They want CHANGE---Sound familiar?

   (New boss will be same as the old boss)

[larsonstdoc]

  They want to change to democracy--of course we know it is psuedo-democracy.  They will be slaves to the NWO.

[larsonstdoc]

  One guy says the people in Eastern Libya have tasted freedom--wrong.  Eastern Libya's oil is now the NWO's oil.

[larsonstdoc]

  Arabs believe that these revolutions are spontaneous and not CIA backed.  They are duped--CIA victory.

 

[Modzilla_Kicker]

I have been following the Arab news, especially a certain popular figure named Amr Khaled, who is very influential across the Arab world, especially on the youths, who constitute the majority of these nations. Well, they are taking these 'revolutions' as seriously as you can imagine. They are not really concerned who is behind it, because they're welcoming change at all costs because life has been so bad for most of the people in the region. The Islamists who have been particularly oppressed under these regimes are very much for change, and they are putting all their efforts in order to 'channel' the change towards a positive future for the masses. That's what's I've been gleaning from following these recent events from Arabic sources..

http://amrkhaled.net

[larsonstdoc]

I have been following the Arab news, especially a certain popular figure named Amr Khaled, who is very influential across the Arab world, especially on the youths, who constitute the majority of these nations. Well, they are taking these 'revolutions' as seriously as you can imagine. They are not really concerned who is behind it, because they're welcoming change at all costs because life has been so bad for most of the people in the region. The Islamists who have been particularly oppressed under these regimes are very much for change, and they are putting all their efforts in order to 'channel' the change towards a positive future for the masses. That's what's I've been gleaning from following these recent events from Arabic sources..

http://amrkhaled.net

  Thanks for your insight.  The fascinating part to me is that the people in the audiences did not believe that an outside source was behind most if not all these revolutions.

[Optimus]

It's Official: "Arab Spring" Subversion is US Funded

Doubts laid to rest; counter revolutions to come.

Tony Cartalucci, Contributing Writer
Activist Post



Bangkok, Thailand April 15, 2011 - As American bombs rain down upon Libya on the premise that Qaddafi was brutalizing indigenous pro-democratic demonstrators, the accusing fingers of Libya, Iran, China, Syria, Belarus, and a growing number of other nations are pointing at Washington for funding and plotting regime change against their respective governments. Either in an act of absolute hubris or to spin emerging evidence that the US indeed has been funding and preparing the ground for the "Arab Spring" for years, New York Times has recently published "U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings."

Essentially throwing these activists under the bus, New York Times exposes that the April 6 Youth Movement in Egypt, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights, and Entsar Qadhi of Yemen amongst others, received training and financing from the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute, and the Neo-Conservative lined Freedom House.

The New York Times goes on to explain that these organizations are in turn funded by the National Endowment for Democracy which receives 100 million USD from Congress while Freedom House receives most of its money from the US State Department. While the New York Times asserts "no one doubts that the Arab uprisings are home grown," leaders of groups now admittedly funded and trained by the US are anything but "home grown." The most prominent example is the April 6 Movement of Egypt led by Mohamed ElBaradei of the International Crisis Group. ElBaradei sitting along side George Soros, Kenneth Adelman, Wesley Clark, and Zbigniew Brzezinski, within a US foreign policy think-tank engenders a considerable amount of "doubt."

Read more » http://www.activistpost.com/2011/04/its-official-arab-spring-subversion-is.html

[Optimus]

U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings
By RON NIXON
Published: April 14, 2011

WASHINGTON — Even as the United States poured billions of dollars into foreign military programs and anti-terrorism campaigns, a small core of American government-financed organizations were promoting democracy in authoritarian Arab states.

The money spent on these programs was minute compared with efforts led by the Pentagon. But as American officials and others look back at the uprisings of the Arab Spring, they are seeing that the United States’ democracy-building campaigns played a bigger role in fomenting protests than was previously known, with key leaders of the movements having been trained by the Americans in campaigning, organizing through new media tools and monitoring elections.

A number of the groups and individuals directly involved in the revolts and reforms sweeping the region, including the April 6 Youth Movement in Egypt, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights and grass-roots activists like Entsar Qadhi, a youth leader in Yemen, received training and financing from groups like the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom House, a nonprofit human rights organization based in Washington, according to interviews in recent weeks and American diplomatic cables obtained by WikiLeaks.

The work of these groups often provoked tensions between the United States and many Middle Eastern leaders, who frequently complained that their leadership was being undermined, according to the cables.

More: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/world/15aid.html?_r=3&pagewanted=1&emc=eta1

[agentbluescreen]

The novel concept of Freedom of Assembly to Address Grievances is the inevitable outcome of the "democratizing process" that has been imposed as the good and proper solution in Afghanistan and Iraq but when this democracy does not suit the corporate-religious aims nor corporate-religious agendas of the "liberators" nor those of their favorite pet-tyrants these notions of freedom are to be trampled? You can't keep your cake and eat it too.

The horrific precedent that America has established in the region by criminally establishing Sunni-Tory and Shiite-Democratic established-religious political parties in Iraq is one it will just have to learn to live with and see broadly expanded and more broadly applied across the entire Muslim world.

You break it, you bought it! Good work Bush, you've just engineered a circus of Frankensteins, pitting established religious monsters against secular and ethnic minorities, just as established-party fascism has done in the US. The fruit of the poisoned tree...

[Protean]

  One of the jerks says Tarpley is a conspiracy theorist and he applauds the Arab people for not believing the CIA conspiracy--unbelievable!!!
    The CIA wins if they don't believe the CIA isn't behind this.  

  We at Prison Planet Forum know who is behind this--the CIA/World Bank/IMF/etc.

One of the MSM's most important brain washing goals: ANYONE who believes in conspiracies is a nutcase.

If you don't believe in conspiracy--YOU ARE ASLEEP ( and that's the way they want you.)

This video is an example of one person awake (Tarpley), one person partly awake (the young man who spoke about Libya in London) and the others brainwashed. The middle eastern man in London is the CIA dream propagandist.

[agentbluescreen]

Promoting "democracy" and promoting Liberty are two completely and entirely different things.

[lovkarpin]

A bit off topic but:
Notice how the setup of interviewees in the studio is arranged, especially the "V" handsign of the arab (?) protestor is emerging behind Webster Tarpley,
is it a an-indirect method to make him look unreliable??