Author Topic: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11  (Read 19130 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline infowarrior_039

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 789
  • explosions in the sky
    • Truth Archive
Quote
"ALEDIA CENTENO RODRIGUEZ, Frente Patriotico Arecibeño, said her organization had spoken last year on the United States strategy to authorize a nuclear weapons production facility in Puerto Rico, in violation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. She explained that Arecibo was home to the Arecibo National Astronomy and Ionospheric Centre (NAIC), which was used as an "ionospheric heater" [an array of antennae which are used for heating the uppermost part of the atmosphere]. Arecibo was also mentioned as a test-site for the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP), in a patent filed by an individual in the United States, to conducted experiments related to ionospheric manipulation. HAARP could function as an anti-missile and anti-aircraft defence system, permit interception and disruption of communications, weather and submarine and subterranean communications, among other things. The HAARP patent papers also stated that the invention could "simulate and perform the same function as performed by the detonation of a heavy type nuclear device".

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/gacol3160.doc.htm


Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,941
Re: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2011, 04:07:00 pm »
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/gacol3160.doc.htm



Nice find.

From the United Nations:

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON DECOLONIZATION
CALLS ON United States TO
EXPEDITE PUERTO RICO’S SELF-DETERMINATION PROCESS

14 June 2007

Excerpted ....

Text Also Requests General Assembly to Consider Question;

Urges Clean Up of Vieques Island, Release of Puerto Rican Political Prisoners
ALEDIA CENTENO RODRIGUEZ, Frente Patriotico Arecibeño, said her organization had spoken last year on the
United States strategy to authorize a nuclear weapons production facility
in Puerto Rico, in violation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
 

She explained that Arecibo was home to the Arecibo National Astronomy and Ionospheric Centre (NAIC), which was used as an “ionospheric heater” [an array of antennae which are used for heating the uppermost part of the atmosphere].  Arecibo was also mentioned as a test-site for the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP), in a patent filed by an individual in the United States, to conducted experiments related to ionospheric manipulation.  HAARP could function as an anti-missile and anti-aircraft defence system, permit interception and disruption of communications, weather and submarine and subterranean communications, among other things.  

The HAARP patent papers also stated
that the invention could “simulate and perform
the same function as performed by the
detonation of a heavy type nuclear device”.


She said Arecibo was also mentioned in connection with the Puerto Rico Karst Conservation Act, which included authorization for the deployment of a nuclear weapons production facility.  Aerial photos taken in the region showed antenna-like devices directed towards the ground, present since the mid-1990s.  The citizens of Arecibo had not been made aware of the consequences or possible effects of those atmospheric experiments.  Statements found in the literature regarding those experiments admit to the use of laser rays aimed at the atmosphere and there have been witnesses to the use of such rays for decades.  There was a high rate of cancer cases of unknown origin in that region.

She said documents from the United States Department of Defence and Energy, and the National Nuclear Security Administration appeared to be directed to the use of Puerto Rican territory for the production of nuclear weapons.  On 17 May, a United States House Bill on the safety for Americans from nuclear weapons testing was introduced, which states that “alternate locations for nuclear testing were being considered”.  The bill also stated that the Department of Energy, acting under the National Environmental Policy Act, would be responsible for handling cases of contamination in the United States.  In addition, Puerto Rico was designated as a territory under the purview of the Radiological Assistance Programme, which was ready to intervene in cases of radioactive contamination.  It would seem that that entity was in charge of the well-being of the people of Puerto Rico in case of a nuclear accident.

A document on land acquisition, available at the property registry of Puerto Rico, Arecibo Section, showed the consolidation of various estates into a single 114 acre estate purchased by the United States Government.  More purchases would follow.  The people of Arecibo were wary of the intentions of the Untied States Department of Defense, and denounced the fact that the people of Puerto Rico were not being included in plans that affected its security and future.  The Committee was urged to refer the case of Puerto Rico to the General Assembly, and to take the necessary precautions to guarantee the security of the hemisphere.
And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,788
Re: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2011, 07:59:28 pm »
  There are many folks who consider HAARP a figment  of our imagination.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. It wasn't but a few centuries past the earth was flat, not long ago nuclear energy was not in our dictionary, computers were unheard of as well as the telly,space exploration,  , the genetic field, weather controll, etc etc and whatever were all classed as fiction, unheard of.
  The old Gov has been into this for the past 60 years, odooles of money, and reams of scientist R & D doesn't sleep..
        

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,941
Re: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2011, 08:54:37 pm »
4/3/2011 -- UN Report -- HAARP can cause 'HEAVY NUCLEAR TYPE EXPLOSION'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrxLo7bMf8s&feature=player_embedded#at=42

And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,941
Re: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2011, 09:04:29 pm »



Copied text of document:
http://www.bariumblues.com/haarp_patent.htm
Claims


I claim:

1. A method for altering at least one region normally existing above the earth's surface with electromagnetic radiation using naturally-occurring and diverging magnetic field lines of the earth comprising transmitting first electromagnetic radiation at a frequency between 20 and 7200 kHz from the earth's surface, said transmitting being conducted essentially at the outset of transmission substantially parallel to and along at least one of said field lines, adjusting the frequency of said first radiation to a value which will excite electron cyclotron resonance at an initial elevation at least 50 km above the earth's surface, whereby in the region in which said electron cyclotron resonance takes place heating, further ionization, and movement of both charged and neutral particles is effected, said cyclotron resonance excitation of said region is continued until the electron concentration of said region reaches a value of at least 10.sup.6 per cubic centimeter and has an ion energy of at least 2 ev.

2. The method of claim 1 including the step of providing artificial particles in said at least one region which are excited by said electron cyclotron resonance.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said artificial particles are provided by injecting same into said at least one region from an orbiting satellite.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said threshold excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is about 1 watt per cubic centimeter and is sufficient to cause movement of a plasma region along said diverging magnetic field lines to an altitude higher than the altitude at which said excitation was initiated.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein said rising plasma region pulls with it a substantial portion of neutral particles of the atmosphere which exist in or near said plasma region.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein there is provided at least one separate source of second electromagnetic radiation, said second radiation having at least one frequency different from said first radiation, impinging said at least one second radiation on said region while said region is undergoing electron cyclotron resonance excitation caused by said first radiation.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said second radiation has a frequency which is absorbed by said region.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein said region is plasma in the ionosphere and said second radiation excites plasma waves within said ionosphere.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein said electron concentration reaches a value of at least 10.sup.12 per cubic centimeter.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein said excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is initially carried out within the ionosphere and is continued for a time sufficient to allow said region to rise above said ionosphere.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein said excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is carried out above about 500 kilometers and for a time of from 0.1 to 1200 seconds such that multiple heating of said plasma region is achieved by means of stochastic heating in the magnetosphere.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein said first electromagnetic radiation is right hand circularly polarized in the northern hemisphere and left hand circularly polarized in the southern hemisphere.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein said electromagnetic radiation is generated at the site of a naturally-occurring hydrocarbon fuel source, said fuel source being located in at least one of northerly or southerly magnetic latitudes.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein said fuel source is natural gas and electricity for generating said electromagnetic radiation is obtained by burning said natural gas in at least one of magnetohydrodynamic, gas turbine, fuel cell, and EGD electric generators located at the site where said natural gas naturally occurs in the earth.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein said site of natural gas is within the magnetic latitudes that encompass Alaska.


DESCRIPTION

1. Technical Field

This invention relates to a method and apparatus for altering at least one selected region normally existing above the earth's surface and more particularly relates to a method and apparatus for altering said at least one region by initially transmitting electromagnetic radiation from the earth's surface essentially parallel to and along naturally-occurring, divergent magnetic field lines which extend from the earth's surface through the region or regions to be altered.

2. Background Art

In the late 1950's, it was discovered that naturally-occuring belts exist at high altitudes above the earth's surface, and it is now established that these belts result from charged electrons and ions becoming trapped along the magnetic lines of force (field lines) of the earth's essentially dipole magnetic field. The trapped electrons and ions are confined along the field lines between two magnetic mirrors which exist at spaced apart points along those field lines. The trapped electrons and ions move in helical paths around their particular field lines and "bounce" back and forth between the magnetic mirrors. These trapped electrons and ions can oscillate along the field lines for long periods of time.

In the past several years, substantial effort has been made to understand and explain the phenomena involved in belts of trapped electrons and ions, and to explore possible ways to control and use these phenomena for beneficial purposes. For example, in the late 1950's and early 1960's both the United States and U.S.S.R. detonated a series of nuclear devices of various yields to generate large numbers of charged particles at various altitudes, e.g., 200 kilometers (km) or greater. This was done in order to establish and study artifical belts of trapped electrons and ions. These experiments established that at least some of the extraneous electrons and ions from the detonated devices did become trapped along field lines in the earth's magnetosphere to form artificial belts which were stable for prolonged periods of time. For a discussion of these experiments see "The Radiation Belt and Magnetosphere", W. N. Hess, Blaisdell Publishing Co., 1968, pps. 155 et sec.

Other proposals which have been advanced for altering existing belts of trapped electrons and ions and/or establishing similar artificial belts include injecting charged particles from a satellite carrying a payload of radioactive beta-decay material or alpha emitters; and injecting charged particles from a satellite-borne electron accelerator. Still another approach is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,042,196 wherein a low energy ionized gas, e.g., hydrogen, is released from a synchronous orbiting satellite near the apex of a radiation belt which is naturally-occurring in the earth's magnetosphere to produce a substantial increase in energetic particle precipitation and, under certain conditions, produce a limit in the number of particles that can be stably trapped. This precipitation effect arises from an enhancement of the whistler-mode and ion-cyclotron mode interactions that result from the ionized gas or "cold plasma" injection.

It has also been proposed to release large clouds of barium in the magnetosphere so that photoionization will increase the cold plasma density, thereby producing electron precipitation through enhanced whistler-mode interactions.

However, in all of the above-mentioned approaches, the mechanisms involved in triggering the change in the trapped particle phenomena must be actually positioned within the affected zone, e.g., the magnetosphere, before they can be actuated to effect the desired change.

The earth's ionosphere is not considered to be a "trapped" belt since there are few trapped particles therein. The term "trapped" herein refers to situations where the force of gravity on the trapped particles is balanced by magnetic forces rather than hydrostatic or collisional forces. The charged electrons and ions in the ionosphere also follow helical paths around magnetic field lines within the ionosphere but are not trapped between mirrors, as in the case of the trapped belts in the magnetosphere, since the gravitational force on the particles is balanced by collisional or hydrostatic forces.

In recent years, a number of experiments have actually been carried out to modify the ionosphere in some controlled manner to investigate the possibility of a beneficial result. For detailed discussions of these operations see the following papers: (1) Ionospheric Modification Theory; G. Meltz and F. W. Perkins; (2) The Platteville High Power Facility; Carrol et al.; (3) Arecibo Heating Experiments; W. E. Gordon and H. C. Carlson, Jr.; and (4) Ionospheric Heating by Powerful Radio Waves; Meltz et al., all published in Radio Science, Vol. 9, No. 11, November, 1974, at pages 885-888; 889-894; 1041-1047; and 1049-1063, respectively, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. In such experiments, certain regions of the ionosphere are heated to change the electron density and temperature within these regions. This is accomplished by transmitting from earth-based antennae high frequency electromagnetic radiation at a substantial angle to, not parallel to, the ionosphere's magnetic field to heat the ionospheric particles primarily by ohmic heating. The electron temperature of the ionosphere has been raised by hundreds of degrees in these experiments, and electrons with several electron volts of energy have been produced in numbers sufficient to enhance airglow. Electron concentrations have been reduced by a few percent, due to expansion of the plasma as a result of increased temperature.

In the Elmo Bumpy Torus (EBT), a controlled fusion device at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, all heating is provided by microwaves at the electron cyclotron resonance interaction. A ring of hot electrons is formed at the earth's surface in the magnetic mirror by a combination of electron cyclotron resonance and stochastic heating. In the EBT, the ring electrons are produced with an average "temperature" of 250 kilo electron volts or kev (2.5.times.10.sup.9 K) and a plasma beta between 0.1 and 0.4; see, "A Theoretical Study of Electron--Cyclotron Absorption in Elmo Bumpy Torus", Batchelor and Goldfinger, Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 20, No. 4 (1980) pps. 403-418.

Electron cyclotron resonance heating has been used in experiments on the earth's surface to produce and accelerate plasmas in a diverging magnetic field. Kosmahl et al. showed that power was transferred from the electromagnetic waves and that a fully ionized plasma was accelerated with a divergence angle of roughly 13 degrees. Optimum neutral gas density was 1.7.times.10.sup.14 per cubic centimeter; see, "Plasma Acceleration with Microwaves Near Cyclotron Resonance", Kosmahl et al., Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 38, No. 12, Nov., 1967, pps. 4576-4582.

(Continued)
And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,941
Re: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2011, 09:12:46 pm »
Other HAARP Patents:

HAARP PATENTS (Assigned to APTI, Inc.)


U.S. Patent 4686605:
Method And Apparatus For Altering A Region In The Earth's Atmosphere,
  Ionosphere, And/Or Magnetosphere

Inventors:  Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued:     Aug. 11, 1987
Filed:      Jan. 10, 1985

U.S. Patent 5038664:
Method For Producing A Shell Of Relativistic Particles At An Altitude
  Above The Earth's Surface

Inventors:  Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued:     Aug. 13, 1991
Filed:      Jan. 10, 1985

U.S. Patent 4712155:
Method And Apparatus For Creating An Artificial Electron Cyclotron
  Heating Region Of Plasma

Inventors:  Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
            Ramo; Simon, Beverly Hills, CA
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued:     Dec.  8, 1987
Filed:      Jan. 28, 1985

U.S. Patent 5068669:
Power Beaming System

Inventors:  Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
            Cha; James T., Fairfax, VA
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued:     Nov. 26, 1991
Filed:      Sep.  1, 1988

U.S. Patent 5218374:
Power Beaming System With Printer Circuit Radiating Elements
  Having Resonating Cavities

Inventors:  Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
            Cha; James T., Fairfax, VA
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued:     June  8, 1993
Filed:      Oct. 10, 1989

U.S. Patent 5293176:
Folded Cross Grid Dipole Antenna Element

Inventors:  Elliot; Paul G., Vienna, VA
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued:     Mar.  8, 1994
Filed:      Nov. 18, 1991

U.S. Patent 5202689:
Lightweight Focusing Reflector For Space

Inventors:  Bussard; Robert W., Manassas, VA
            Wallace; Thomas H., Gainesville, FL
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued:     Apr. 13, 1993
Filed:      Aug. 23, 1991

U.S. Patent 5041834:
Artificial Ionospheric Mirror Composed Of A Plasma Layer
 Which Can Be Tilted
Inventors:  Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued:     Aug. 20, 1991
Filed:      May. 17, 1990

U.S. Patent 4999637:
Creation Of Artificial Ionization Clouds Above The Earth

Inventors:  Bass; Ronald M., Houston, TX
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued:     Mar. 12, 1991
Filed:      May. 14, 1987

U.S. Patent 4954709:
High Resolution Directional Gamma Ray Detector

Inventors:  Zigler; Arie, Rishon Le Zion, Israel
  Eisen; Yosset, Rishon Le Zion, Israel
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued:     Sep.  4, 1990
Filed:      Aug. 16, 1989

U.S. Patent 4817495:
Defense System For Discriminating Between Objects In Space

Inventors:  Drobot; Adam T., Annandale, VA
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued:     Apr.  4, 1989
Filed:      Jul.  7, 1986

=======================================

And this one...

=======================================

U.S. Patent 4873928:
Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation
Inventors:  Lowther; Frank E., Plano, TX
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued:     Oct. 17, 1989
Filed:      June 15, 1987

Abstract

A method for producing a high yield explosion without radioactive fallout comprising filling an expendible structure with an explosive mixture of a combustible gas (e.g. methane) and an oxidizer gas (e.g. oxygen) and then detonating said mixture.

Other References
Austin et al., Explosive Hazard of Aluminum-Liquid Oxygen Mixtures, Jour. Chem. Ed., vol. 36, #2, Feb. 1959, pp. 54-5


Class 149/109.6 - PROCESSES OF MAKING
http://www.patentstorm.us/class/149/109.6/PROCESSES_OF_MAKING/1.html
Subclass of Class 149 - Explosive and thermic compositions or charges
Definition: Processes which are generic to the preparation of compositions
No. of patents: 474
Last issue date: 03/01/2011

Class 149/109.2 - CONTAINING PARTICULAR FUEL AND PARTICULAR OXIDIZER
http://www.patentstorm.us/class/149/109.2/CONTAINING_PARTICULAR_FUEL_AND_PARTICULAR_OXIDIZER/1.html
Subclass of Class 149 - Explosive and thermic compositions or charges
Definition: Subject matter comprising compositions having a particular
No. of patents: 48
Last issue date: 08/05/2008

Class 102/323 - Having a rupturable or expandable casing
http://www.patentstorm.us/class/102/323/Having_a_rupturable_or_expandable_casing/1.html
Subclass of Class 102 - Ammunition and explosives
Definition: Subject matter wherein (a) the container is designed to
No. of patents: 45
Last issue date: 05/06/2008

Class 102/324 - Having a flexible tube or bag container
http://www.patentstorm.us/class/102/324/Having_a_flexible_tube_or_bag_container/1.html
Subclass of Class 102 - Ammunition and explosives
Definition: Subject matter wherein the container comprises a pliable
No. of patents: 47
Last issue date: 04/01/2008

Class 434/218 - NUCLEAR ENERGY OR RADIOACTIVE RADIATION DETECTION OR SIMULATION
http://www.patentstorm.us/class/434/218/NUCLEAR_ENERGY_OR_RADIOACTIVE_RADIATION_DETECTION_OR_SIMULATION/1.html
Subclass of Class 434 - Education and demonstration
Definition: Subject matter relating to energy released by atomic fission
No. of patents: 53
Last issue date: 04/29/2008

And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,941
Re: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2011, 09:38:19 pm »
HISTORY AND APPLICATIONS OF HAARP TECHNOLOGIES:
THE HIGH FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM

http://www.padrak.com/ine/HAARP97.html
By: Patrick Bailey and Nancy Worthington


An updated and revised version of a paper originally submitted in June 1997 to the 1997 Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, the 32nd IECEC, held July 27 - August 1, 1997, in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Posted to the INE Website with the permission of authors.

HISTORY AND APPLICATIONS OF HAARP TECHNOLOGIES: THE HIGH FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM

Patrick G. Bailey
Institute for New Energy
P. O. Box 201
Los Altos, CA 94023-0201
www.padrak.com/ine/

Nancy C. Worthington
AUM Foundation
P. O. Box 201
Los Altos, CA 94023-0201
www.padrak.com/aum/

ABSTRACT

A serious review of HAARP is presented. On the surface, HAARP appears to be a nice military "scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere".

Upon further investigation, HAARP appears to be filled with secrecy and fraught with possible severe dangers. Attempts to reopen an official assessment of this program and its old out-dated unclassified Environmental Impact Statement have thus far failed.

HAARP appears to be in use by ARCO to sell natural gas to the military that would otherwise be trapped in Alaska. The HAARP patents imply that Billions of Watts could easily be used to power HAARP, with no or few equipment upgrades. The patents are now owned by a major military contractor. Many of the possible applications, as stated in the actual patents supporting HAARP, would be classified.

An Independent Review Committee needs to be formed to access the possible dangers of the various real and possibly classified HAARP projects. This Committee needs to be independent from US Federal politics, Alaska state politics, the US military, and ARCO oil interests, and would probably need to report to both the Congress and the Senate. There is a great need to form this Review Committee, and the time to form it is NOW!

INTRODUCTION

The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) looks like a harmless research project - especially when first viewed from a limited exterior viewpoint. However, when viewed from a wider perspective and with more detailed supporting data and information, HAARP begins to look more complex and even very secret and covert. It is not the intent of this paper to debate or discredit the existing project. Rather, it is the intention of this paper to raise honest questions and concerns about an on-going project whose actual operation may indeed be secret. As free citizens, it is our duty to openly question and find out what we are allowing others to do, especially if they can affect us on a large-scale and perhaps on a world-wide basis!

INFORMATION SOURCES

Information on HAARP has come primarily from the following major sources: (1) The official HAARP Project Information and Data (HAARP Home Page, current); (2) the "HAARP HF Active Auroral Research Program Joint Services Program Plans And Activities" (HAARP, Feb. 1990); (3) A book by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning that outline the status and possible dangers of HAARP (Begich and Manning, 1995); (4) a summary of that book in an Australian review article entitled "HAARP: Vandalism in the Sky?" (Nexus Mag., Jan. 1996); (5) the Patents that been identified that support HAARP (Patents, IBM, current); (6) other related information from the internet, such as the "Alternate HAARP Page" (Padberg, J., current), "The HAARP Game Home Page" (unauthored, current), and "HAARP: Specific Project Goals Taken From The Major HAARP Patent With Comments" (unauthored, Sept. 1996); and (7) on-going internet website information and UseNet postings found using search engines on HAARP.

Further detailed information can also be obtained in a continuing newsletter on this topic (Begich, N., current).

It must be truthfully recalled that in almost all of the US military programs of the past 20 years or so, the public has been allowed to know only a small amount of the information that was really known about those programs - and the public was certainly told none of the dangers involved. From the Trinity atomic bomb tests, to other nuclear blast tests, to the storage of high-level nuclear wastes, to the use of chemicals in Vietnam, to the use of chemicals in Iraq, to the effects of high velocity aircraft being used today - the public was told nothing of the dangers, and later had to live with - and are now living with - the consequences.

What about possible negative consequences of HAARP?

It may be that our best source of future data regarding the truth about HAARP will only come from the internet.

While it is important to support our country's military and our own national defense, it is more important to question the effects of our research projects and the authority of those in whom we have placed our trust. It is not only our right, IT IS OUR DUTY!

It is hoped that data will also come from those involved with the truth and details of the real operational goals of the project.

THE OFFICIAL HAARP PROJECT

Purpose and Objectives of HAARP


The official "Purpose and Objectives of the HAARP Program" are given in their website home page (HAARP Home Page, current):

"HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes.

The HAARP program is committed to developing a world class ionospheric research facility consisting of:

The ionospheric research instrument (IRI), a high power transmitter facility operating in the HF frequency range.

The IRI will be used to temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere for scientific study.

Diagnostic instruments that will be used to observe the physical processes that occur in the excited region.

Observation of the processes resulting from the use of the IRI in a controlled manner will allow scientists to better understand processes that occur continuously under the natural stimulation of the sun.

In addition, diagnostics installed at the HAARP facility will be useful for a variety of other research purposes including the study of global warming and ozone depletion."

Frequently Asked Questions

In an attempt to answer all questions regarding the possible negative and harmful effects of HAARP, the HAARP home website provides in its "Frequently Asked Questions" page:

"Q: Are there any health hazards due to fields produced by HAARP?

A: The health and safety of the public (and of the scientific researchers who will be present at the site) has been a primary focus in the design of the HAARP IRI. There are no locations on-site where the E-M fields exceed safety standards for RFR exposure as defined by IEEE/ANSI C95.1-1992 and NCRP Report No 86. In fact, the E-M fields measured at the closest public access to the site are lower than those existing in many urban environments. We have provided a more detailed look at this issue in a separate page on HAARP E-M Safety.

Q: Will HAARP be used to generate ELF?

A: Previous experience at other facilities has shown that it is possible to generate a small but useful ELF signal through ionospheric heating. This field will be more than one and a half billion times weaker than the Earth's background field and about one million times weaker than the level where researchers have reported biological effects in the literature. The field is so weak, in fact, that sophisticated instruments must be used to observe it, yet it is still quite useful for many applications. Also see the ELF section for a thorough discussion of this aspect of ionospheric research.

Q: What about radio frequency interference?

A: Analyses conducted during the environmental impact process suggest that radio frequency interference could occur for receiver systems that operate in the areas surrounding Gakona. However, other facilities similar to the HAARP IRI and its diagnostic instruments have achieved compatibility with other users of the radio frequency environment. The government is committed to achieve compatibility with other users of the electromagnetic spectrum and an electromagnetic compatibility program has been established to assure this goal is achieved.

Q: How large will the HAARP IRI be when it is complete?

A: When it is completed, the HAARP IRI will consist of 180 antennas on a total land area of about 23 acres. The final facility will have a total transmitter power of about 3,600 killowatts. This is the last phase of the project and is the maximum size that was approved (and the maximum size that can be constructed) in accordance with the Environmental Impact Process. We have provided a comparison of the various phases of the IRI throughout the program, from the initial prototype up to and including the final facility.

Q: Can HAARP be used for military purposes?

A: The HAARP facility will be used for basic and applied research related to the study of the Earth's ionosphere. It is not designed to be an operational system for military purposes. The HAARP specifications were developed by a consortium of universities to meet the requirements for a world-class research facility and an expanded group of universities are playing a major role in the design of future research efforts. Administratively, HAARP is restricted to operate only on a "not to interfere" (NIB) basis by the NTIA and is classified as an experimental station in the NTIA spectrum certification document."

It is a major concern of many scientists and researchers that perhaps these questions and answers do not cover all of the ground that the HAARP Program itself plans to cover during its operations in future years - especially when the power dramatically increases!.

BACKGROUND

On Nov. 3, 1993, the U.S. Air Force announced that the prime contractor on the first phase of the HAARP project was ARCO Power Technologies, Inc. (APTI). At the time the project was put out for bids, APTI was a subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Oil Company (ARCO) and owned the patent rights to various patents pertaining to the HAARP project, such as those invented by Bernard J. Eastlund. How did a small subsidiary get the military contract for such a large project? One that was five times large than APTI's annual budget? The answer seems to lie in the patents owned at the time by APTI.

And why should ARCO be interested or involved?

ARCO is one of the largest employers in Alaska, where it is primarily involved in the North Slope oil fields. As ARCO oil is a major industry there, the Alaska State government has been very supportive of the HAARP Program. The University of Alaska has also benefited from this program in several ways, and would also be supportive of HAARP. (Begich and Manning, 1995).

In those ARCO oil fields, the natural gas is re-injected into the Earth rather than "flared" off or produced for use, as done in most other oil fields around the world. The re-injected gas increases the oil field pressure and thus creates enhanced oil production. No market for this natural gas exists, as it would be very expensive to pipe it from there to market in the US. The HAARP site is close to an already granted right-of-way for a future Trans-Alaska gas Pipeline! All of the significant regulatory hurdles have been passed for constructing the gas line should markets be found. Does HAARP and its possible military mission represent a huge natural gas market for ARCO?

At its present stage, HAARP does not represent a high energy consumer in terms of input power for ARCO. The first two phases of the project may not have consumed more than one to ten megaWatts of power. HOWEVER: What about the future? If the project follows the plans outlined in the patents and what the project planners may want, the power demands could SHARPLY increase - to ARCO's advantage. The patents talk about using billions of Watts of power. The HAARP Home Page references 3.6 billion Watts! Who would stop such a project if it its power levels got that far?

And the story gets more involved. After the HAARP contact was awarded to APTI, APTI was sold to E-Systems in June 1994, under undisclosed terms. That is interesting in that APTI is reported to have shown no net income since it opened in the late 1980's. E-Systems changed the name of the company to Advanced Power Technologies Incorporated (a different APTI, yet the same spelling as in the patents), and assumed control of the patents and the HAARP project. E-systems is also one of the largest intelligence contractors in the U.S. The value in this sale seems to be the patents and the HAARP contract.

In 1995, Raytheon Corporation was reported to have bought and acquired E-Systems for $2.3 Billion (Wall Street Journal, 1995). Raytheon is a very large company with several large military contacts, some of course classified. What is Raytheon doing with HAARP? The value of the HAARP program may only be found in its patents.

THE PATENTS

"ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI) held twelve patents, all of which were linked to Star Wars defense systems. APTI was the main contractor on the first phase of the HAARP project. These patents represented technologies which were inconsistent with the normal activities of Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), the patent organization of APTI. In ARCO's 1994 annual report, no mention of APTI or the HAARP contract was found. Apparently ARCO was not in the kind of technology and military construction contacting business suggested by this technology. APTI was an anomalous subsidiary of ARCO, with ARCO having no real expertise, outside of APTI, for developing these kinds of patents." "This writer believes that ARCO did not want to be involved in the defense industry development of these patents. After all, they were just looking for a market for natural gas. Gas on the North Slope of Alaska was the issue for ARCO. The cost of a pipeline and related facilities needed to move the gas to southern Alaska was estimated at more than $20 billion, pricing the gas out of the market. So APTI acquired the twelve patents and a potentially lucrative market." (Begich and Manning, 1995, pp. 111-124).

An information packet containing all twelve patents is available (Begich, N., current).

For your information and for public release, here are those twelve patents. Note carefully the titles.
(See above: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=205138.msg1226619#msg1226619 )

Additional information on each of these patents can be quickly found using the easy-to-use IBM Womplex Patent Search System by patent number web page (Patents, IBM, current), or at the STO's Internet Patent Search System web page (Patents, STO, current).
Figs. 1 through 4 illustrate some aspects of the HAARP technology from figures taken from HAARP records and patents.

POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS

The HAARP project is different than other "atmospheric heaters" in that the Eastland device in Patent 4,686,605 would allow a concentration of one Watt per cc in the atmosphere, compared to other heaters that are only able to deliver about one-millionth of a Watt per cc. This is a huge difference to other devices, and patents, which was "sufficient to cause movement of a plasma region along said diverging magnetic field lines to an altitude higher than the altitude at which said excitation was initiated", as quoted from a Jan. 1987 amendment to the original patent application in order to receive the subsequent patent.

A review of the other patent titles shows that one application of this technology may be Power Beaming; Patents 5,068,669, 5,218,374, & 5,202,689: Transmitting the power represented by the Alaskan ARCO natural gas fields into the atmosphere to be received by appropriate receiver stations in other locations! Clearly, such applications would be initially classified.

Patent 5,041,834 creates an Artificial Ionospheric Mirror that could be used for over-the-horizon radar and other such communications for the military over great distances. It could also be used to locate with high accuracy and possible resolution incoming objects.

The other patents deal primary with components of the well-known "Star Wars "systems, and could provide other applications in particle beam technology, space-based defense, and plasma laser-like weapons.

It appears that ALL of these potential applications could be classified by the military in support of the National Defense.

POSSIBLE HIDDEN AGENDAS

How much power would be enough?

The HAARP project is designed so that the power can be increased without the replacement of any of the projects physical parts. The proof-of-concept phase of the project could easily turn into a full weapons system or power transmission system phase.

Phase one of the project began in Dec. 1994, and ended in 1995, with an estimated effective-radiated power of one gigaWatt. The second phase is set to increase the power several times of "at least 100 dbW", or about 10 Billion Watts of power (HAARP, Feb. 1990).

As the antenna gain of HAARP is about 1000, the actual input power required to generate 10 Billion Watts of effective-radiated power would be about 10 Million Watts of generated input power.

This concept was illustrated by Princeton, NJ, physicist Dr. Richard Williams, while commenting on his view of the HAARP project in Nov. 1994:

"My main objection to HAARP is that they intend to dump electromagnetic radiation into the upper atmosphere at very high power levels...The radiated power level will be between '90 dbW and 100 dbW'...They refer at one point to the need to go 'at least' to 100 dbW. One way to visualize this power level is that a 10-billion Watt generator running continuously for one hour, would deliver a quantity of energy equal to that of a Hiroshima-size atomic bomb."

A few scientists and researchers also think that the use of HAARP has already been extended to NASA missions, such as the ill-fated "Tethered Satellite". The use of such a tether could easily be used to receive power transmitted by HAARP. The fact that that tether melted and broke during deployment was probably not due to HAARP, but rather due to our own current lack of technical understanding of the electro-magnetic physics that apply in the upper atmosphere (Hoagland, 1996).

According to these and other patents, and the various references cited below, the possible applications of HAARP at these higher power levels are:

Power Beaming to the Earth
Power Beaming to Orbital Satellites and to Space Stations
Sunlight Reflection
Charged Particle Acceleration
Beam Weapon
Over-horizon Radar
Long Distance Communications
ELF and VLF Communications
POSSIBLE DANGERS

What the actual dangers that HAARP poses are of course under some debate.

However: There is a big difference between what the dangers of the "Current HAARP Program" are, and what the dangers of the "Future HAARP Program" are! There is also a major difference between the dangers of a non-classified project and those posed by a large classified project whose scope and details are not made available to the general public!

The author of the "HAARP Game Home Page" on the internet titles his website: "HAARP is not unique or new technology. It is a continuation of war science discoveries from the 1950's" (unauthored, current).

It must be recalled that the entire HAARP Environmental Impact Statement was written in 1993 for the initial phases of the program, with the use of the lower power levels. This Environmental Impact Statement DOES NOT address the effects of the higher power levels that are planned for HAARP or any classified project applications.

Even attempts to obtain background material on HAARP have net with official resistance and refusal. An official request for the proceedings of the government workshop on HAARP, "Presentations from the HAARP Workshop on Ionospheric Heating Diagnostics" in 1991 (Fisher, D., Oct. 1991) was met with an official denial of the public's right to obtain that information (Kossey, P., May 1996). This information, as well as the complete list of attendees of that workshop (Unauthored, 1991), are all available on the internet. Complete website URLs are included for your use in each reference, where known.

A "Formal letter that the United States Air Force prepare a supplement to the July 1993 HAARP Final Environmental Impact Statement" has been submitted to the HAARP Project and even the President of the US, without visible effect thus far (Van Tuyn, P., May 1996). It is on the internet. Read it!

The effects of HAARP on the weather are completely unknown. "Weather Modification" is a very interesting subject, and if it existed, would absolutely become a classified project, in the interest of National Security. The effect of heating the jet stream over Alaska could have profound results on the weather in Denver or Miami, depending on the time of year and the original position of the jet stream over Alaska. To say that HAARP cannot or will not influence the weather is just not true. How much it will influence the weather is just unknown.

Also, we know that earthquakes are occur when tectonic plates shift. What would be the effect of massive ionized power coming from the Earth's atmosphere into the Earth's core? Could it be enough to trigger slight or major earthquakes? Perhaps.

ELF (Extremely Low Frequencies) and VLF (Very Low Frequencies) communications are also controversial topics of discussion. While the military currently uses such low frequencies within the Earth and the oceans to communicate with submarines world-wide, the use of the atmosphere for such communications may produce disastrous effects on insects, birds, animals, and humans!

Several researchers have already noted major adverse effects that have occurred in Alaska since the beginning of the HAARP experimentation program, and they point to HAARP as the only cause (Begich and Manning, 1995).

Researchers have estimated that such radiations will be similar to those found under power-lines, and much more severe, as the frequency will be more attuned to life functions and brain waves. One researcher is quoted as saying that insects and other life forms that depend upon using their antenna will be affected world-wide!

In addition, several other researchers have pointed out that in the future operational phases of the program, EMF waves will be produced within the atmosphere that are in the same frequency band as human brain waves. Our conscious and unconscious activities have been found to be controlled by brain waves in the range from 1 to about 35 Hz. Our conscious activity is regulated by brain waves in the 14-35 Hz range (Beta). Our unconscious and higher conscious activity is in the range of 8-14 Hz (Alpha). Our relaxed and deeply relaxed states are in the ranges of 4-8 Hz (Theta) and 1-4 Hz (Delta) (Hurtak, J., 1997). As the frequency decreases, the effect is more pronounced and more unconscious. The effect of large power EM radiations pulsing though the atmosphere on living creatures and human consciousness in these frequency ranges is completely unknown!

It has also been shown that both ELF and VLF radiations can affect and entrain human brain wave patterns in ways that are against that of the individual's will (Hurtak, J., Aug. 1996).

A list of the possible dangers include:

ELF and VLF Pollution
Disastrous Resonance Effects in Living Systems
Affects on Living Things
Affects on Insects
Affects on Human Brain Waves
Weather Disasters
Natural Disasters
Earthquakes


SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

HAARP appears as a nice and ambitious military "scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes". The HAARP Final Environmental Impact Statement was completed in 1993, and addresses the unclassified use of HAARP with very low amounts of input and transmitted power. Attempts to reopen an official assessment of this program have thus far failed. HAARP appears to be in use by ARCO to sell natural gas to the military that would otherwise be trapped in Alaska. The HAARP patents imply that Billions of Watts could easily be used to power HAARP, with no or few equipment upgrades. The patents are now owned by a major military contractor. Many of the possible applications, as stated in the actual patents supporting HAARP, would be classified. You can draw your own conclusions:

We are not being told the truth about the HAARP Program.
Alaska politics will always be supportive of HAARP.
The military will always be supportive of HAARP.
The military advantages could be significant.
The real dangers are completely unknown.
The real dangers could be very large in several areas!
The dangers to life may out weigh the military advantages.
THIS PROGRAM MAY NOT BE WORTH THE RISK!

An Independent Review Committee needs to be formed to access the possible dangers of the various real and possibly classified HAARP projects. This Committee needs to be independent from US Federal politics, Alaska state politics, the US military, and ARCO oil interests, and would probably need to report to both the Congress and the Senate. There is a great need to form this Review Committee, and the time to form it is NOW!

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The information, data, and support provided by Nick Begich and Jeane Manning is gratefully acknowledged, as well as their permission to quote from their book. We also thank all those individuals listed in the References, and all the other writers and networkers, both past and future, who are asking hard questions and when getting no answers do not ever, ever give up!

REFERENCES

Begich, N., and Manning, J., "Angles Don't Play This HAARP," Earthpulse Press, P.O. Box 916, Homer Alaska 99603, 907-249-9111, (or at local bookstores), 1995.

Begich, N., "The Flashpoints Newsletter," P.O. Box 201393, Anchorage, Alaska 99520, current.

Begich, N., "HAARP Patent Package (12 Patents)," P.O. Box 201393, Anchorage, Alaska 99520, current.

Fisher, Drew, "Presentations from the HAARP Workshop on Ionospheric Heating Diagnostics", 30 April - 2 May 1991, Phillips Laboratory (AFSC), Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-5000, Major Drew R. Fisher, Editor, www.micronet.net/~lb/HC/nstlmnt1.html, 22 Oct 1991.

HAARP Program, "HAARP HF Active Auroral Research Program Joint Services Program Plans And Activities", www.xyz.net/~nohaarp/jspd.htm, Feb. 1990.

The HAARP Home Page, server5550.itd.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/index.html, current.

Nexus Magazine, "HAARP: Vandalism In The Sky?", Volume 3, Number 1 (December '95-January '96), www.icom.net/~nexus/HAARP.html, or www.padrak.com/alt/HAARP3_BKUP.html, Jan. 1996.

Hoagland, Richard, personal communications, 1996.

Hurtak, James J., personal communications, 1997.

Hurtak, J. J., "Effects of ELF and VLF on the Human Mind", Art Bell Radio Show Program Tape No. 960830C, Aug. 1996.

Kossey, P., Letter Denying Public Access and Disclosure of the "PL/GP Technical Memorandum No. 195, 1991 HAARP Workshop", Paul Kossey, www.micronet.net/~lb/HC/ 195.html, May 1996.

Padberg, Jim., "The Alternative HAARP Page", www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1606/akhaarp.html, current.

Patents, US, IBM Patent Server Website, patent.womplex.ibm.com, current.

Patents, US, STO's Internet Patent Search System Website, sunsite.unc.edu/patents/intropat.html, current.

Unauthored, "The HAARP Game Home Page", www.micronet.net/~lb/HC/game.html, current.

Unauthored, "HAARP: Specific Project Goals Taken From The Major HAARP Patent With Comments", www.padrak.com/alt/HAARP6.html, Sep. 1996.

Unauthored, 1991 HAARP Workshop Attendees & Affiliates, www.micronet.net/~lb/HC/work.html, 1991.

Van Tuyn, Peter, "Formal letter that the United States Air Force prepare a supplement to the July 1993 HAARP Final Environmental Impact Statement", www.xyz.net/~nohaarp/trustees.htm, May 1996.

Wall Street Journal, "Raytheon to Acquire E-Systems for $64 a Share...", Pages A1, A3, and A16, April 3, 1995.
And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline Freeski

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,706
Re: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2011, 09:41:48 pm »
Son of a bitch. It's not that surprising actually but it's a new scary thought. CAESAR or WATSON. <<< extremely creepy stuff!
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline JT Coyoté

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,520
  • "REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"
Re: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2011, 11:10:52 pm »
U.S. Patent 4873928:
Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation
Inventors:  Lowther; Frank E., Plano, TX
Assignees:  APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued:     Oct. 17, 1989
Filed:      June 15, 1987



I first became aware of the Lowther patent in the early 1990's which was said to have the capacity to set the atmosphere on fire.  However the method of implementing this "atmospheric fire" didn't become clear to me until the spring of 2005.  The melt from the 5 feet of snow-pack in the backyard revealed a mottled layer of fine powder that had been washed from the sky by the winter snows.

That spring, the rains fell, and the edges of the puddles that resulted were ringed with the same whitish yellow particles floating on the surface... everywhere I went in the county I saw the same thing.

I first thought it was pollen, but there is no pollen in the deep of winter to be found in the snow melt unless it was from a much warmer climate that had reached us through the upper atmosphere. I pulled out the microscope and put some of the stuff on a slide hoping to reveal its organic structure, still thinking it was pollen... what I found was not organic at all but micron sized metallic particles from tiny flakes to small irregular shapes and spheroids, no crystalline mineral or organic pollen structures were observed...

Using the earths immense magnetic field to "fire" the atmosphere would require an electro-magnetic lattice in the atmosphere itself to conduct the massive electrical charge the earth generates, in order to create the immense heat or micro-wave burst to fry all the delicate brain structures on the planet... Hmm

JTCoyoté

"Color of Law government, no matter it's structure,
plots and manufactures crisis and catastrophe in the
same laboratory as their solution, thus tyranny turns
every contingency into an opportunity for enhancing
power unto itself."
~Oldyoti
   

Offline attietewd

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,667
Re: HAARP Patent: Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation: Date 3/1/11
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2011, 11:53:36 pm »
6 years ago one summer evening I began to notice a film that looked like tiny particles floating on the surface of our pool water. If you moved the surface of the water they move like an oily slick coating.  At first I thought it might be suntan lotion.  So we put a ball which absorbs oil into the filter basket.  When that didn't stop it I thought it might be pollen although but I had never noticed it before.  Then I thought maybe my pump wasn't working properly and it might be sand from the pump blowing back into the pool so we replaced the sand in the filter.  When that didn't work we replaced the whole pump.  I thought then it was the pool liner disintergrating from old age so we bought a new pool (the pool was over 20 years old). When that didn't work I thought it might be fibers from our deck carpeting which was made of a synthetic material that looked like grass.  We replaced the carpeting and this film continues to be on the surface of the water.  It only shows in a particular light or at night when the moonlight seems to reflect off of the particles and makes them shiny.  I first noticed this happening in 2005.  I am now thinking it is either aluminum particles or polymers from the chemtrails we get everyday and would bet any money that 2005 is when they really ramped up the aerial spraying of fake clouds.  PA here. 
“Thus, condemnation will never come to those who are in Christ Jesus…”