Lybia: Soetoro officially notifies Congress that he doesn't care what they think

[No2NWO]

Obama Letter to Congress on Libya Sparks Protests

WASHINGTON-President Barack Obama Monday formally notified Congress the U.S. had begun military attacks on Libya, prompting complaints from lawmakers that the president waged war without congressional consent, appearing to contradict his own previous position.

In a letter to congressional leaders, the president said the U.S. had "commenced operations to assist an international effort authorized by the United Nations (U.N.) Security Council" and "to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe and address the threat posed to international peace and security by the crisis in Libya."

Presidents over the decades have conducted military operations without prior congressional approval, including Harry Truman in Korea, George H.W. Bush in Iraq and and President Bill Clinton in Serbia. Congress in 1991 approved the Iraq military action, five months after Mr. Bush deployed forces to the region in response to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. The military action in Libya, which Congress wasn't asked to approve, irked lawmakers.

Full story: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704355304576215073989153598.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

[Freeski]

No foreign entanglements.

Best law ever!

The rest is all what-if scenarios.

[agentbluescreen]

No foreign entanglements.

Best law ever!

The rest is all what-if scenarios.

List of United Nations resolutions concerning Israel

United Nations Security Council resolutions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_UN_resolutions_concerning_Israel_and_Palestine


Resolution 42: The Palestine Question (5 March 1948) Requests recommendations for the Palestine Commission

Resolution 43: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Recognizes "increasing violence and disorder in Palestine" and requests that representatives of "the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the Arab Higher Committee" arrange, with the Security Council, "a truce between the Arab and Jewish Communities of Palestine...Calls upon Arab and Jewish armed groups in Palestine to cease acts of violence immediately."

Resolution 44: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Requests convocation of special session of the General Assembly

Resolution 46: The Palestine Question (17 Apr 1948) As the United Kingdom is the Mandatory Power, "it is responsible for the maintenance of peace and order in Palestine." The Resolutions also "Calls upon all persons and organizations in Palestine" to stop importing "armed bands and fighting personnel...whatever their origin;...weapons and war materials;...Refrain, pending the future government of Palestine...from any political activity which might prejudice the rights, claims, or position of either community;...refrain from any action which will endager the safety of the Holy Places in Palestine."

Resolution 48: April 23, 1948, calls on all concerned parties to comply with UNSC Resolution 46 and establishes a Truce Commission for Palestine to assist the SC in implementing the truce. Approved 8-0, abstentions from Colombia, Ukrainian SSR and USSR.

Resolution 49: May 22, 1948 issues a cease-fire order to come into effect at noon, May 24, 1948, New York time. Orders the Truce Commission for Palestine previously set up to report on compliance. Passed by 8-0, abstentions from Ukrainian SSR, USSR and Syria.

Resolution 50: May 29, 1948, calls for a four week ceasefire covering Palestine, Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Transjordan and Yemen. Urges all to protect the Holy Places and Jerusalem. Offers the UN Mediator as many military observers as necessary. Further violations and the Council would consider action under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. Adopted in parts; no voting on the resolution as a whole.

Resolution 53: The Palestine Question (7 Jul 1948)

Resolution 54: The Palestine Question (15 Jul 1948)

Resolution 56: The Palestine Question (19 Aug 1948)

Resolution 57: The Palestine Question (18 Sep 1948)

Resolution 59: The Palestine Question (19 Oct 1948)

Resolution 60: The Palestine Question (29 Oct 1948)

Resolution 61: The Palestine Question (4 Nov 1948)

Resolution 62: The Palestine Question (16 Nov 1948)

Resolution 66: The Palestine Question (29 Dec 1948)

Resolution 72: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)

Resolution 73: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)

Resolution 89 (17 November 1950): regarding Armistice in 1948 Arab-Israeli War and "transfer of persons".

Resolution 92: The Palestine Question (8 May 1951)

Resolution 93: The Palestine Question (18 May 1951)

Resolution 95: The Palestine Question (1 Sep 1951)

Resolution 100: The Palestine Question (27 Oct 1953)

Resolution 101: The Palestine Question (24 Nov 1953)

Resolution 106: The Palestine Question (29 Mar 1955) 'condemns' Israel for Gaza raid.

Resolution 107: The Palestine Question (30 March)

Resolution 108: The Palestine Question (8 September)

Resolution 111: The Palestine Question (January 19, 1956) " ... 'condemns' Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people".

Resolution 113: The Palestine Question (4 April)

Resolution 114: The Palestine Question (4 June)

Resolution 127: The Palestine Question (January 22, 1958) " ... 'recommends' Israel suspends its 'no-man's zone' in Jerusalem".

Resolution 138: (June 23, 1960) Question relating to the case of Adolf Eichmann, concerning Argentine complaint that Israel breached its sovereignty.

Resolution 162: The Palestine Question (April 11, 1961) " ... 'urges' Israel to comply with UN decisions".

Resolution 171: The Palestine Question (April 9, 1962) " ... determines flagrant violations' by Israel in its attack on Syria".

Resolution 228: The Palestine Question (November 25, 1966) " ... 'censures' Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control".

Resolution 233 Six Day War (June 6, 1967)

Resolution 234 Six Day War (June 7, 1967)

Resolution 235 Six Day War (June 9, 1967)

Resolution 236 Six Day War (June 11, 1967)

Resolution 237: Six Day War June 14, 1967) " ... 'urges' Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees".

Resolution 240 (October 25, 1967): concerning violations of the cease-fire

Resolution 242 (November 22, 1967): Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area. Calls on Israel's neighbors to end the state of belligerency and calls upon Israel to reciprocate by withdraw its forces from land claimed by other parties in 1967 war. Interpreted commonly today as calling for the Land for peace principle as a way to resolve Arab-Israeli conflict

Resolution 248: (March 24, 1968) " ... 'condemns' Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan".

Resolution 250: (April 27) " ... 'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem".

Resolution 251: (May 2) " ... 'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250".

Resolution 252: (May 21) " ... 'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital".

Resolution 256: (August 16) " ... 'condemns' Israeli raids on Jordan as 'flagrant violation".

Resolution 258: (September 18)

Resolution 259: (September 27) " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation".

Resolution 262: (December 31) " ... 'condemns' Israel for attack on Beirut airport".

Resolution 265: (April 1, 1969) " ... 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on Salt, Jordan".

Resolution 267: (July 3) " ... 'censures' Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem".

Resolution 270: (August 26) " ... 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon".

Resolution 271: (September 15) " ... 'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem".

Resolution 279: (May 12, 1970) "Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory."(full text)

Resolution 280: (May 19) " ... 'condemns' Israeli's attacks against Lebanon".

Resolution 285: (September 5) " ... 'demands' immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon".

Resolution 298: (September 25, 1971) " ... 'deplores' Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem".

Resolution 313: (February 28, 1972) " ... 'demands' that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon".

Resolution 316: (June 26) " ... 'condemns' Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon".

Resolution 317: (July 21) " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon".

Resolution 331: (April 20, 1973)

Resolution 332: (April 21) " ... 'condemns' Israel's repeated attacks against Lebanon".

Resolution 337: (August 15) " ... 'condemns' Israel for violating Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity and for the forcible diversion and seizure of a Lebanese airliner from Lebanon's air space".

Resolution 338 (22 October 1973): " ...'calls' for a cease fire" in Yom Kippur War and "the implementation of Security Council Resolution 242 (1967) in all of its parts", and "Decides that, immediately and concurrently with the cease-fire, negotiations shall start between the parties concerned under appropriate auspices aimed at establishing a just and durable peace in the Middle East."

Resolution 339 (23 October 1973): Confirms Res. 338, dispatch UN observers.

Resolution 340 (25 October): "Demands that immediate and complete cease-fire be observed, per 338 and 339, and requests to increase the number of United Nations military observers

Resolution 341 (27 October): "Approves the report on the implementation resolution 340

Resolution 344 (15 December)

Resolution 346 (April 8, 1974)

Resolution 347: (April 24)" ... 'condemns' Israeli attacks on Lebanon".

Resolution 350 (31 May 1974) established the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force, to monitor the ceasefire between Israel and Syria in the wake of the Yom Kippur War.

Resolution 362 (October 23) decides to extend the mandate of the United Nations Emergency Force for another six months

Resolution 363 (November 29), regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force

Resolution 368 (April 17, 1975)

Resolution 369 (May 28, 1975)

Resolution 371

Resolution 378

Resolution 381

Resolution 390

Resolution 396

Resolution 398

Resolution 408

Resolution 416

Resolution 420

Resolution 425 (1978): " ... 'calls' on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon". Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon was completed by 16 June 2000.

Resolution 426

Resolution 427: " ... 'calls' on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon".

Resolution 429

Resolution 434

Resolution 438

Resolution 441

Resolution 444: " ... 'deplores' Israel's lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces".

Resolution 446 (1979): 'determines' that Israeli settlements are a 'serious obstruction' to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".

Resolution 449

Resolution 450: " ... 'calls' on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon".

Resolution 452: " ... 'calls' on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories".

Resolution 456

Resolution 459

Resolution 465: " ... 'deplores' Israel's settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel's settlements program".

Resolution 467: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's military intervention in Lebanon".

Resolution 468: " ... 'calls' on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return".

Resolution 469: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's failure to observe the council's order not to deport Palestinians".

Resolution 470

Resolution 471: " ... 'expresses deep concern' at Israel's failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".

Resolution 474

Resolution 476: " ... 'reiterates' that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are 'null and void'".

Resolution 478 (20 August 1980): 'censures (Israel) in the strongest terms' for its claim to Jerusalem in its 'Basic Law'.

Resolution 481

Resolution 483

Resolution 484: " ... 'declares it imperative' that Israel re-admit two deported Palestinian mayors".

Resolution 485

Resolution 487: " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel for its attack on Iraq's nuclear facility".

Resolution 488

Resolution 493

Resolution 497 (17 December 1981) decides that Israel's annexation of Syria's Golan Heights is 'null and void' and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith.

Resolution 498: " ... 'calls' on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon".

Resolution 501: " ... 'calls' on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops".

Resolution 506

Resolution 508:

Resolution 509: " ... 'demands' that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon".

Resolution 511

Resolution 515: " ... 'demands' that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in".

Resolution 516

Resolution 517: " ... 'censures' Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon".

Resolution 518: " ... 'demands' that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon".

Resolution 519

Resolution 520: " ... 'condemns' Israel's attack into West Beirut".

Resolution 523

Resolution 524

Resolution 529

Resolution 531

Resolution 536

Resolution 538

Resolution 543

Resolution 549

Resolution 551

Resolution 555

Resolution 557

Resolution 561

Resolution 563

Resolution 573: " ... 'condemns' Israel 'vigorously' for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters.

Resolution 575

Resolution 576

Resolution 583

Resolution 584

Resolution 586

Resolution 587 " ... 'takes note' of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw".

Resolution 590

Resolution 592: " ... 'strongly deplores' the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops".

Resolution 594

Resolution 596

Resolution 599

Resolution 603

Resolution 605: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.

Resolution 607: " ... 'calls' on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Resolution 608: " ... 'deeply regrets' that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians".

Resolution 609

Resolution 611

Resolution 613

Resolution 617

Resolution 624

Resolution 630

Resolution 633

Resolution 636: " ... 'deeply regrets' Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.

Resolution 639 (31 Jul 1989)

Resolution 641 (30 Aug 1989): " ... 'deplores' Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians.

Resolution 645 (29 Nov 1989)

Resolution 648 (31 Jan 1990)[1] The Security Council extends the mandate of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon until July 31, 1990.

Resolution 655 (31 May 1990)

Resolution 659 (31 Jul 1990)

Resolution 672 (12 Oct 1990): " ... 'condemns' Israel for "violence against Palestinians" at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.

Resolution 673 (24 Oct 1990): " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.

Resolution 679 (30 Nov 1990)

Resolution 681 (20 Dec 1990): " ... 'deplores' Israel's resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.

Resolution 684 (30 Jan 1991)

Resolution 694 (24 May 1991): " ... 'deplores' Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.

Resolution 695 (30 May 1991)

Resolution 701 (31 Jul 1991)

Resolution 722 (29 Nov 1991)

Resolution 726 (06 Jan 1992): " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of Palestinians.

Resolution 734 (29 Jan 1992)

Resolution 756 (29 May 1992)

Resolution 768 (30 Jul 1992)

Resolution 790 (25 Nov 1992)

Resolution 799 (18 Dec 1992): ". . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return.

Resolution 803 (28 Jan 1993)

Resolution 830 (26 May 1993)

Resolution 852 (28 Jul 1993)

Resolution 887 (29 Nov 1993)

Resolution 895 (28 Jan 1994)

Resolution 904 (18 Mar 1994): Cave of the Patriarchs massacre.

Resolution 938 (28 Jul 1994): extends mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon until January 31, 1995.

Resolution 1039 (29 Jan 1996)

Resolution 1052 (18 Apr 1996)

Resolution 1057 (30 May 1996)

Resolution 1068 (30 Jul 1996)

Resolution 1073 (28 Sep 1996)

Resolution 1081 (27 Nov 1996)

Resolution 1095 (28 Jan 1997)

Resolution 1109 (28 May 1997)

Resolution 1122 (29 Jul 1997)

Resolution 1139 (21 Nov 1997)

Resolution 1151 (30 Jan 1998)

Resolution 1169 (27 May 1998)

Resolution 1188 (30 Jul 1998)

Resolution 1211 (25 Nov 1998)

Resolution 1223 (28 Jan 1999)

Resolution 1243 (27 May 1999)

Resolution 1254 (30 Jul 1999)

Resolution 1276 (24 Nov 1999)

Resolution 1288 (31 Jan 2000)

Resolution 1300 (31 May 2000)

Resolution 1310 (27 Jul 2000)

Resolution 1322 (07 Oct 2000)

Resolution 1328 (27 Nov 2000)

Resolution 1337 (30 Jan 2001)

Resolution 1351 (30 May 2001)

Resolution 1397 (12 Mar 2002) the first resolution to explicitly call for a two-state solution.

Resolution 1435 (24 Sep 2002) called for an end to Israeli measures in and around Ramallah.

Resolution 1559 (2 September 2004) called upon Lebanon to establish its sovereignty over all of its land and called upon Syria to end their military presence in Lebanon by withdrawing its forces and to cease intervening in internal Lebanese politics. The resolution also called on all Lebanese militias to disband.

Resolution 1583 (28 January 2005) calls on Lebanon to assert full control over its border with Israel. It also states that "the Council has recognized the Blue Line as valid for the purpose of confirming Israel's withdrawal pursuant to resolution 425.

Resolution 1648 (21 December 2005) renewed the mandate of United Nations Disengagement Observer Force until 30 June 2006.

Resolution 1701 (11 August 2006) called for the full cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah.

Resolution 1860 (9 January 2009) called for the full cessation of war between Israel and Hamas.

Lets do what the UN Security Council demands, Obama bin Soetoro!

[Freeski]

^ That's a ton of bullshit!

[jofortruth]

Libya - Obama - And Webster Tarpley's comments on the UN Resolution - He says it even violates the UN Charter, and Libya was never a threat to the US in this incident:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showtopic=9076&view=getnewpost

[One Revelator]

From OP’s article:

Sen. Jim Webb, (D., Va.,) said in an interview Monday with MSNBC, "We have not had a debate and I know that there was some justification put into place because of concern for civilian casualties, but this isn't the way that our system is supposed to work."

In 2007, Mr. Obama, then a presidential candidate, said, "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."

Explanation….

“The White House said the president's actions don't contradict his earlier views, noting that the president met with a bipartisan group of lawmakers regarding Libya before any action took place.”
A senior administration official said that the 2007 comment envisioned "an invasion like we saw in Iraq. A mission of this kind, which is time-limited, well-defined, and discrete, clearly falls within the President's constitutional authority."
<snip>
The president, with his letter, appeared to meet the requirements of the 1973 War Powers Resolution, which says only that in cases where the president doesn't seek prior approval from lawmakers, the president must notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and puts a 60 day deadline on such actions.

Mission accomplished!  CYA in 60 days when we rename it “the long war”

Mr. Obama's notification letter does not satisfy the constitutional requirement that Congress approve military action, says Lou Fisher, former researcher with the Congressional Research Service and an expert on war powers. Mr. Fisher also raised objections to Mr. Obama citing United Nations authorization in his letter.

"It's impossible for Congress to take its war powers and give it to the U.N.," Mr. Fisher said. "Other than defensive actions—and there's no defensive actions here—this has to be done by Congress."

Small, brief voice of sanity…

House Speaker John Boehner doesn't believe the president always needs congressional approval to go take military action, a spokesman for the Ohio Republican said. However, "members of Congress from both parties, as well as the American people, are demanding the administration do a better job answering some basic questions about the scope and purpose of our mission in Libya, America's role, and how it will be achieved," said the spokesman, Brendan Buck.

Kiss up all you want, John. Fact is, there’s limited time till your owners tell you …

[No2NWO]

Libyan bombing 'unconstitutional', Republicans warn Obama

US public opinion split as Republicans claim Obama's use of military force in Libya is 'an affront to our constitution'


**Congressman Roscoe Bartlett, a Republican on the House armed services committee, was among members who argued that military action in Libya was unconstitutional. He told the Hill magazine: "The United States does not have a King's army. President Obama's unilateral choice to use US military force in Libya is an affront to our constitution."

**Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Republican who chairs the House foreign affairs committee, called on the president to "clearly define for the American people what vital United States security interests he believes are currently at stake in Libya".

**The Republican House speaker, John Boehner, in a statement issued on Sunday, underlined the dilemma for Republicans. His statement was aimed primarily at criticising Obama for lack of consultation but he began by expressing support for intervention.

**Republicans such as Senator John McCain have criticised Obama for acting too late, suggesting the forces would have been more effective if deployed weeks ago.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/22/libyan-conflict-unconstitutional-obama-warned

[One Revelator]

Libyan bombing 'unconstitutional', Republicans warn Obama

US public opinion split...

No, it isn’t.  Well, on second thought, if they consider themselves “the public” then the split would be something like 99.997 vs .003 percent of the US population.

But since members of the Republican Party stand to make serious bank over this, I’m reminded of their official plans for the American people.

"Pornography and politics are two growth industries, and we don't think the nation can be too picky about where the jobs are coming from." -- Republican Caucus spokesman, Dec 2010

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?&topic=194869.0

[yon]

So why won't the brave members of Congress pass legislation that prohibits the President from taking military action without the consent of Congress?

He's commander of the military. Not the King. Oh but I forgot, he was illegally elected, so he's not really President.

Does that mean he's King?

[Krateros]

So why won't the brave members of Congress pass legislation that prohibits the President from taking military action without the consent of Congress?

As I no doubt imperfectly understand (from having been made to read Schlesinger on the subject), the brave members of Congress essentially handed their constitutional right to declare war to the President some time ago, under the auspices of “expediency,” of course:

War Powers Resolution Act

[One Revelator]

So why won't the brave members of Congress pass legislation that prohibits the President from taking military action without the consent of Congress?

He's commander of the military. Not the King. Oh but I forgot, he was illegally elected, so he's not really President.

Does that mean he's King?

The movie directors and financiers have always held the highest authority, not the paid actors. It becomes quite predictable when they have already given us the script.

Commentary: Seeing Things From a Red Shield Perspective
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?&topic=203686.0

[No2NWO]

Rep. Dennis Kucinich: Defund Libya attack

Liberal Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich plans to offer up a measure that would defund U.S. efforts in Libya.

According to a letter blasted to his email list, Kucinich plans to offer an amendment to the next spending bill to ensure no federal funds go to the bombing campaign in Libya.

The amendment would give Congress a more concrete opportunity than they’ve had to challenge President Barack Obama on Libya, a subject that has riled both sides of the aisle.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51736.html#ixzz1HLWzY3Gu

[larsonstdoc]

  Of course he doesn't care.  He's the Dictator-in-Chief.

[yon]

  Of course he doesn't care.  He's the Dictator-in-Chief.

http://www.watchmanscry.com/audio/Nathan_112310.mp3



http://www.watchmanscry.com/audio/Nathan_112310.mp3

[carlee]

President Franklin Roosevelt signs the declaration of war against Japan on Dec. 8, 1941, following the bombing of Pearl Harbor.   After the war was over A declaration of peace was never signed
Denigration of formal declarations of war
In Classical times, Thucydides condemned the Thebans, allies of Sparta, for launching a surprise attack without a declaration of war against Plataea, Athens' ally - an event which touched off the Peloponnesian War.[11]

The utility of formal declarations of war has always been questioned, either as sentimental left overs from an age of chivalry or as imprudent warnings to the enemy. For example, writing in 1737, Cornelius van Bynkershoek judged that "nations and princes endowed with some pride are not generally willing to wage war without a previous declaration, for they wish by an open attack to render victory more honourable and glorious."[12] Writing in 1880, William Edward Hall judged that "any sort of previous declaration therefore is an empty formality unless the enemy must be given time and opportunity to put himself in a state of defence, and it is needless to say that no one asserts such a quixotism to be obligatory."[13]

In the United States, Congress which makes the rules for the military has the power under the Constitution to "declare War," however there is no prescribed legal format for what a War declaration will look like in the United States Constitution or by law. Declarations have the force of law and are intended to be executed by the President as Commander in Chief of the armed forces. The last time United States passed a bill with the title "Declaration of War" was in 1942, against Romania. Since then, the United States has used the term "Authorization to use Military Force" as in the case against Iraq in 2003. Sometimes decisions for military engagements were made by US presidents, without formal approval by Congress, based on UN Security Council resolutions that did not declare UN or its members at war. Other times, for example, part of the justification for the United States invasion of Panama was to capture Manuel Noriega (as a prisoner of war)[14] because he was declared a criminal rather than as belligerent
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Declaration_of_war?qsrc=3044

[John_Back_From_The_Club_O]

Notifying congress he doesn't care = Notifying the American public he doesn't care what they think.

[larsonstdoc]

Notifying congress he doesn't care = Notifying the American public he doesn't care what they think.

  Soetoro is not in charge of the NWO's Army.  Soros, Brzezinski, Kissinger and Co. Are in charge.

[worcesteradam]

Barry Bin Soetero, supreme ruler of the ancient Americans

[shipgeek]

This is just the air attacks.
They will have to send ground troops afterwards.
It's going to be very fugly.

 

[Rebelitarian]

Looks like the NWO is revving up to go into full ALL OUT mode.

[yon]

  Soetoro is not in charge of the NWO's Army.  Soros, Brzezinski, Kissinger and Co. Are in charge.

Interesting that Catholics keep getting nominated to the High Court. There are now NO PROTESTANTS.




Obama’s White Papal Masters:
 

    Chain of Command

Adolfo Nicolas
30th Superior General, Society of Jesus
“The Black Pope”

Pope Benedict XVI
Vicar of Christ/Vicar of Horus
“The White Pope”

(there's a long list including....and I think they're ALL MASONS)

Zbigniew Brzezinski
Member: Knights of Malta
Member: Bilderberg Group
Member: Council On Foreign Relations
Member: Trilaterial Commission
Advisor: Jesuit Georgetown University
Polish Roman Catholic Socialist-Communist
Professor: Columbia University, New York
Recruiter of Barry Soetoro, 1981
Creator of “Barack Hussein Obama”

George Soros
Member: Council on Foreign Relations
Member: Carlyle Group
Multi-billionaire
Major Stockholder: Halliburton
Hungarian Jew: Socialist-Communist
Financial Backer of Barack Hussein Obama
Friend of Rupert Murdoch
Freemasonic Jewish Labor Zionist
    “Court Jew for the Pope”

Rupert Murdoch
Member: Council on Foreign Relations
Member: Knights of St. Gregory
International Media Mogul
Owner: Fox News Network
Friend of George Soros
Occult Protector of Barack Hussein Obama
    Bill O’Reilly – The O’Reilly Factor

    Sean Hannity – Hannity & Combes

Joseph R. Biden
Papal Knight; Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor
Vice President: Rome’s “Holy Roman”
    14th Amendment American Empire
Alter Ego: Jesuit Advisor to
    President Barry Davis Obama
Promoter: Council on Foreign Relations
Honorary Degrees:
    Jesuit University of Scranton, Scranton, PA
    Jesuit St. Joseph’s University, Philadelphia, PA

            Barry Davis
            “Barack Hussein Obama”
            32nd Degree Prince Hall Freemason
            President of Rome’s “Holy Roman,”
                14th Amendment American Empire
            Sunni Moslem, Pretended Protestant Christian
            Mulatto: Mulatto Father, White Mother
            Father: Frank Marshall Davis, Jr.
            Wife: Michelle, Member: Chicago CFR
            Obama: CFR-Controlled and CFR Spokesperson
            Obama: Promoted by the late William F. Buckley, Jr.
                Buckley: Knight of Malta, Bonesman, Bilderberger, CFR Member
                Buckley: Promoter of Reverse Discrimination against Whites
                Buckley: Promoter of a Coming Black President
            Obama: Trained in Romanism, Islam and Apostate Protestantism
            Obama: “Nimrod”; Pretended Unifier of Whites and Blacks
            Obama: Promoter of the Papal Crusade against Shia Islam
            Obama: Promoter of Bush’s Papal Inquisition
                Against Protestant American Liberties
            Obama: Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor
                Promotor of the Black Pope’s Counter-Reformation
            Barry Davis: “Boy” of Pope Benedict XVI


http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2009/08/white-papal-masters/

[shipgeek]

They are sending Qatari aircrafts to the air base in Corsica so they can participate to the attacks against Libya.
Where will this madness end?

Qatari fighters deployed to Solenzara, expected to begin flying for OdysseyDawn by the weekend

 

[One Revelator]

Interesting that Catholics keep getting nominated to the High Court. There are now NO PROTESTANTS.

Rome plays a role. Exact overall hierarchy is speculative.

NWO pyramid/structure/hierarchy
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=155517.0

Alex Jones: The Real Pyramid of Power -- Alex double-dog dares the Beckster!!!!!
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=130288.0

Other threads around via search function.

[Kilika]

So why won't the brave members of Congress pass legislation that prohibits the President from taking military action without the consent of Congress?

He's commander of the military. Not the King. Oh but I forgot, he was illegally elected, so he's not really President.

Does that mean he's King?

That's already in the Constitution. No need for more and more "resolutions". That's just clutters up the place. But then that is part of their agaemplan, to literally swamp the public with resolutions and general information overload all the while completely ignoring the Constitution which already covers all of this.

King? Nay, just dictator by fraud.

[shipgeek]

Four Qatar Emiri AF Mirage 2000 Mk5 jets now at Solenzara, with plans to start operations within 48 hours.
(i.e. bombing Libya)

Why would the Emir of Qatar want to get into this when the UAE said they would only participate to humanitarian ops and would send no airplanes to bomb Libya?

Pure madness.

 

[yon]

Rome plays a role.

They've got a role all right. After Napoleon abolished Papal civil power, the Vatican didn't just fade away. They've worked behind the scenes thru infiltration of governments and secret societies ever since via Masons and Jesuits.  If they ever regained civil power a new inquisition wouldn't be far behind.


How the Vatican created Islam
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
How the Vatican created Islam. The astonishing story from an ex-Jesuit priest, Alberto Rivera, which was told to him by Cardinal Bea while he was at the ...
www.remnantofgod.org/books/docs/How-the-Vatican-Created-Islam.pdf

[One Revelator]

They've got a role all right. After Napoleon abolished Papal civil power, the Vatican didn't just fade away. They've worked behind the scenes thru infiltration of governments and secret societies ever since via Masons and Jesuits.  If they ever regained civil power a new inquisition wouldn't be far behind.


How the Vatican created Islam
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
How the Vatican created Islam. The astonishing story from an ex-Jesuit priest, Alberto Rivera, which was told to him by Cardinal Bea while he was at the ...
www.remnantofgod.org/books/docs/How-the-Vatican-Created-Islam.pdf

This member’s posts may be of interest to you.  He doesn’t post much anymore but he researched and had quite a lot to say about Rome.

Amishism
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1000

[yon]

This member’s posts may be of interest to you.  He doesn’t post much anymore but he researched and had quite a lot to say about Rome.

Thanks for the heads up. Did a quick search and found like the who's who in American(NWO) government.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1000;sa=showPosts

Don't want to hijack the thread, but it's all connected. The sad part to me is that the so-called Protestant Reformation was more of a rebellion. The daughters of the old whore didn't really reform the Greco-Roman-Babylonian Sun Worship foundation, and as a result never renounced Papal spiritual authority, according to Catholic hierarchy. In fact, I heard this with my own ears years ago when Robert Schuller(Reformed Dutch) was going on about how his Crystal Cathedral came to be. He said that he had the architectural plans approved by the Pope!  



VOTKINSK, Russia (Reuters) - Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin Monday likened the U.N. Security Council resolution supporting military action in Libya to medieval calls for crusades.
ca.news.yahoo.com/putin-likens-u-n-libya-resolution-crusade-calls-