The NWO is frightened of the two party monopoly it owns?

[worcesteradam]

we need to be against any PR reforms, PR is part of the NWO governance architecture.
They are pushing it big here in Europa

It may be part of this wider agenda  -  http://infowars.wikia.com/wiki/The_Consultation_Process

[Geolibertarian]

we need to be against any PR reforms,

Wrong, we need to be for them.

To those who haven't already closed their minds to it, please examine the following to understand why:

       http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/polit/damy/BeginnningReading/beginningreadings.htm

PR is part of the NWO governance architecture.

Oh, of course, and I suppose instant runoff voting is too, right? Because nothing scares the NWO more than (gasp!) the continuation of the two-party monopoly in Washington that has served them so well all these years.

You might as well claim that the NWO is scared of eugenics while you're at it. 

Get a grip.

[Rebelitarian]

http://www.believeinamerica.com/index.php
http://www.constitutionparty.org
 


Constitution Party Promotional Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_SobkISNrY

and now on Facebook.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_193359317343131#!/profile.php?id=821750173

Get out and help build the party, be a part of the solution.   

[Ghost of Oliver Cromwell]

I think what Adam is getting at is the move to have an Alternative vote system in the U.K. where if a candidate gets a majority less than 50% then it takes into consideration the voters second third, or fourth choice. It sounds needlessly complicated and would make it even easier to carry out voting fraud. There was a pretty good article on spiked explaining why it's a bad idea.
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10255/

oh and AV isn't PR

[Rebelitarian]

No voting for a 2 party oligarchy is a bad idea.  The fact that states can discriminate against other party ballot seekers is just wrong.  Not good for the Republic at all.  A slew of Libertarian party candidates were elected in the 2010 election.  What's wrong with electing the best candidate with the most votes and having the other 5 parties deal with disappointment for a change.

Say we elect a Libertarian President, who gets 40% of the vote.  If he were to betray us to a Globalist agenda then a Green-Party Governor and a Constitution Party Mayor have just as much a chance to block un-Constitutional legislation.  So far it has been the Oligocracy between the Democrats and Republicans in many states that have brought America to where it is now.

50 candidates for Miss America and only 2 for President, at least the 50 candidates get equal air time.  

[worcesteradam]

Globalist salesmen launch IRV/AV reform push

Ed Miliband shares cross-party platform to promote AV
• Miliband shares stage with Tim Farron and Caroline Lucas
• Urges voters not to treat AV poll as a referendum on Clegg

Tortuous efforts to set up a cross-party platform in favour of the alternative vote have finally borne fruit with Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, Tim Farron, the Liberal Democrat president, and Caroline Lucas, the Green party leader, joining forces to back reform.

Miliband insisted that voters should not decide which way to vote based on particular personalities. He said, it is not about Nick Clegg, it is about changing your voting system, and not a stick with which to beat the government.

In his speech, Miliband said that despite the current Lib Dem coalition with the Conservatives, he still believed that AV would help progressive centre-left parties to "build bridges not barriers".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/mar/29/ed-miliband-cross-party-promote-av