CBS covered up RAND Corporation "SMART RAPE" of anti-war journo Lara Logan

[Dig]

CBS complicit in news coverup
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view.bg?articleid=1317384
By Michael Graham
Thursday, February 17, 2011 - Updated 6 hours ago


Dateline — Egypt:

“[60 Minutes] correspondent Lara Logan was repeatedly sexually assaulted by thugs yelling, ‘Jew! Jew!’ as she covered the chaotic fall of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in Cairo’s main square Friday.”

Powerful reporting on an important story. Two problems: It didn’t run until yesterday, and CBS didn’t run it. The quote is from the New York Post. And it was The Wall Street Journal that reported “the separation and assault lasted roughly 20 to 30 minutes.”

But CBS? They sat on their own story. For five days, as reporters reveled amid giddy celebrations in Tahrir Square, and as President Obama praised President Obama’s handling of the Egyptian crisis, CBS reported nothing.

Only when other media had the story did CBS break the news that its own chief foreign correspondent was the victim of “a brutal and sustained sexual assault.”

[Dig]

CBS, Viacom, and Sumner Redstone:

"So sorry we helped MI6/CIA enslave 80 million people into the cybernetic meat grinder via our propaganda operations which will never in 1,000 years ever be called 'news' again. But don't worry...we will scare the shit out of you with predictive programming via our False Flag show 'NCIS' and our satanic mock child sacrifices on music awards shows."

[JumpingBear]

Maybe sexually assaulted but not brutally "gang raped" by 200 Muslims as the MSM is trying to portray is as, possibly to stoke more islamophobia (possibly for a future war with Egypt/Israel).

Source
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-ZWfe5Anw

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704409004576146661656309184.html#articleTabs%3Darticle

Check the 3rd Paragraph in the article, according to a spokesman who was there or spoke to someone there "It was not a rape"

Not that a sexual assault is any better, but i think the MSM is trying to start something here.  Since the rape part is not true I am also beginning do doubt the validity of the sexual assault also.

What do you guys think?

[citizenx]

Major neocon psyop possibly.

Who did the "sexual assaulting"?

Was it agents provocateurs?

I am very skeptical about this now.

CBS reports it as simply "not a rape".

Major manipulations are going on around this right now.

[chrisfromchi]

Well considering the white house felt it was alright to say that obama called her at the hospital...possibly it is all overblown.

cause i think that if she experienced a brutal and sustained gang rape at the hands of muslim freedom protesters who were shouting jew jew jew at her they would have more class as not to attach obama's name and the president to it for attention...cause he is so great he had to call her and then and his press secretary announce that.

Like if i was a president and this type of incident happened it would be something like a bernstein book or memiors and it would be like 2 sentences for me to let the public at large know that i had called her...years after.

i dunno really.

its not something i would want for any woman to experience and I would consider those that did commit any type of assault aganist her as rapists.

but we are back at the definition of rape and is aren't we...

[foreverfree]

CBS HAS to report that it wasn't a rape and that it was a fun celebration she went to in order to reduce liability on their part.  If they admit they sent her to a mob scene and riot with not enough security then they will be paying out MILLIONS more than they already will be. 

you won't find the truth in the MSM about this, as usual.  have to go overseas for the story.

ask yourself though, why is she still in the hospital if it wasn't a gang rape?  if they just roughed her up, even broke a few bones, she wouldn't still be in the hospital. 

[citizenx]

Lara Logan Part I
 
"I've got an 8 pound Bass hanging on the wall that, if he could talk, would tell you what happens when you swallow anything that is presented without checking it out really well first, and this story smells like he would after about three days in the sun !"


I was talking to a friend of mine as I scanned the international news websites starting with Matt Drudge, when the headline blared out the news . As soon as I saw it, I immediately said, I bet it's Lara Logan !.. No I didn't have special powers, or inside info, but I do have a good memory.
I remembered the 'scuttlebutt' during the Iraq war and Afghanistan recounting her interesting habit of attempting to break the monotony over there by 'boinking' several soldiers and other contract employees sometimes in the back of pickup trucks and hummers. This practice was widely known by those who could get her anything she was in need of. (transportation to the front, permission to travel to certain destinations, information she could use, etc.) That's why I said I bet its Lara Logan. It just didn't smell right. (No pun intended)  but back to the story.


So let's start out with the term most journalists and editors use until the facts are proven. The Term is 'allegedly' .
Were there any witnesses to this alleged 'sexual' assualt ? (as opposed to a crowd of people hollering at her, or smacking or pushing her around and in the process touching her in her 'no no places' as we tell our kids) You know witnesses are people willing to come forward and say 'Yep, I saw it, that's what happened all right'


The second red flag was the use of terms like 'she was surrounded by dangerous elements'  and  'It was a crowd of 200 whipped up into a frenzy !'  nothing suspicious here right ??!! 


'She was rescued by a group of women and about 20 soldiers' .. so I assume one of them (at least) must have seen this alleged 'sexual' assault right? Did they attempt to take her to any hospital or anywhere else for medical treatment ? Did the soldiers attempt to round up those responsible ? Did in fact, anybody see this alleged sexual assault which presumably took place in a crowd of thousands of witnesses ? C'mon folks .. anybody ?


Another red flag (for me) was .. 'she was covering the 'jubilation in the square'  and I thought to myself, is this what people in Egypt do when they are celebrating their new found freedom? Is this what I would do if I were an Egyptian and I had just heard that this tough fought battle against Mubarak was won ? At a time when I'd be standing there with my heart bursting with pride and my mouth filled with joyous chants, do I say .. 'Hey I'm so proud to re-write Egyptian history after years of oppression, let's go grab that american reporter and beat her up and have our way with her guys. I mean who will see it, who will notice? ... I think not.


Look folks we'd already seen Anderson Cooper being chased all over Cairo, and 'roughed up' (he must have come from a different neighborhood then were I grew up !) and sweet little Katie Couric run screaming to the airport after being 'crowded' so reporters being chased and screamed at, at this point, was getting to be a normal bill of fare on the TV news.  Typical page 6 stuff.


Then along comes Lara, a little bigger, a little different, a little better story Lara. A reporter with a reputation for doing whatever it takes to get 'face time' on TV Lara.
I suspect that she knew that getting roughed up would have hardly elicited a yawn at that point, so she decided to 'pump it up' or 'sex it up' as the Brits would say, just a little. Let's make it more interesting. We'll add a little sex to the story (You know how those Americans love that stuff !)


Did they throw her down on the ground and gang rape her, or did some Egyptian in his excitement plant a wet one on her face without asking her permission first ? (the nerve !)  I mean we know 'Those Mooslims' are known for sexually assaulting women in crowded squares in front of thousands of witnesses right ? Please !!


I've got an 8 pound Bass hanging on the wall that, if he could talk, would tell you what happens when you swallow anything that is presented without checking it out really well first, and this story smells like he would after about three days in the sun !


So, if  "There will be  'no further comment from CBS News'  and correspondent  'Logan and her family respectfully request privacy at this time" ... I guess we'll just have to take her word for it right ?  (Not !!)
Sorry Lara, if its all true, you have my sympathies, but until I hear it from witnesses all I can say is ..
Lara your reputation precedes you !


But true or false .. Let's examine how this story will play .. What's the subliminal message here ?.. What will the drones walk away with after reading it .. 'Those Egyptians have brought shame down on themselves and Egypt !'  .. 'How brave our journalists are for facing these beatings and assaults in an effort to defend the 4th Estate !' ... Now who would want to put that kind of a message out !  Surely not the big MSM's like Fox, CNN, ABC, or CBS ! 


Now I'm aware that some REAL journalists were arrested and beaten etc, but as far as I can keep count, most of the 'talking heads' from the MSM that were there trying to use the occasion as a backdrop for there stories, ended up suffering mostly from shoulder sprains as a result of excessive 'patting themselves on the back' for being sooo brave !


Honestly, I'm beginning to think that CBS has come to stand for 'Complete Bull Shi # ..'
Yahoo's Story here ... Scroll down to the comments section at the bottom of the page .. Interestingly it says "There are no comments yet" and underneath that ..
"Comments have been closed for this article"  well, I guess that's one way of stifling the input ! I wonder why?

http://tundratruth.blogspot.com/p/my-stuff.html

[citizenx]

cont'd.


The Saga of Lara Logan .. Part ll  !

    From: The Alaska Intel Report  (alaskaintelreport.com)



Well folks as you may have imagined, today I grabbed my pick and shovel and went out on the net to see what gems of truth I could find to fill in the holes on this story. What I found out was quite another matter, as it appears that, if not the story, at least the way the story is being handled has been orchestrated without a doubt. 


Since the invention of the fax machine (and later the net) those in power have had to change their approach to keeping things quiet. No longer could they suppress, kill and threaten those who know what's going on to keep it all hush hush. When somebody in Moscow, or Cairo or wherever can slip a document or picture into a fax machine, (or email) and have it pop out in New York City it became time to re-formulate their approach to 'security'. Apparently someone suggested the 'Gold Nugget in the bucket of mud' approach to hiding the facts. Since they could no longer hide the truth, they decided to dump tons of BS out there to help cover it up. Today I've been out there slogging through that mud. It's dirty time consuming work, but you would be surprised what you can find out if you have the time (and the stomach) to wade through it.


First of all I wont bore you with all the garbage I read today but suffice to say 98% of the sites were .. 'Oh Boo Hoo ..Poor Lara' .. stuff, mostly including an unbelievable amount of  Anti-Arab, Anti-Muslim, Anti-Men, Anti-Egyptian 'clap trap' for lack of  a better word. I expected this, I mean we're men right? We don't like to see women beat up or assaulted, it makes us mad and we want to protect women from all that. It's our nature. However .. I didn't quite expect the amount of vitriolic outpouring of hatred, racism, and Anti-Muslim bigotry  I ran into.


Secondly, this is the first time I can remember, that I ran into so many websites that had the comments section CLOSED or so heavily moderated that no questioning of the story or comments about Logan herself were tolerated  !  Even the 'drone' sites that just carried the straight story from CBS (Complete BullS hit ) mostly fell into this category. So people have to ask themselves what is it about this story that makes it sooo .. important that NO QUESTIONS about the full story and NO COMMENTS running contrary to their piece will be tolerated !  (Most of them shut down the comment section rather then even take a chance that someone might question what they were dishing out.) Getting that many sites to shut down their comment section for this (one) story is quite a feat ! Face it, that fact alone screams orchestrated !!
 
Third, a few years ago stories of her sexual exploits with the troops etc. were fairly common on the web, but it looks like they've been pretty well vacuumed up with the exception of  this one .. In 2008, she became a minor tabloid press sensation – NY Post Page Six, and even the holiest of holies, The National Enquirer – at the center of a Baghdad romantic triangle. One guy was a US Embassy attaché, the other a CNN reporter.  from Mallory's Camera


Fourth, as the Committee to Protect Journalists correctly pointed out that 52 journalists were attacked and 76 were imprisoned during the unrest in Egypt that led Mubarak to step down after 30 years in power. All have been released, it said.  One journalist, Ahmad Mohamed Mahmoud of the Egyptian newspaper Al-Ta'awun, was killed while filming clashes near Tahrir Square, the CPJ said." .... Reuters   ( So with over 100 journalists attacked or arrested Why Lara Logan ? .. What makes this story so 'special' ? )

As I mentioned in my previous article yesterday, "this just don't feel, look, or smell right !"  For instance even Susan Milligan from US News (Hardly a Muslim friendly person, had to admit ..)  "In Muslim Albania, I found that rebels who stopped to check us for weapons would barely touch me, although they would examine my male colleagues in a way that would make a TSA screener blush. As Muslims, they automatically recoiled at touching a strange woman  .. (I’d pull open my field vest to show I had no weapons, which was enough)"


"The Wall Street Journal cited an unnamed source as saying Logan, a married mother, was not raped, however, details regarding the exact nature of the assault remain unclear. ... Neither CBS nor Logan reported the crime to Egyptian authorities "      The Post Chronicle
  "The difference was Coopers attack and the arrest and assault on journalist at that time, supposedly came from pro Mubarak forces trying to squelch the uprising. Logan 's assault came at a time when .. the Egyptian people were jubilant and celebrating in the streets of Cairo"     Yahoo Associated Content



"It is unclear whether Friday's assault against Ms. Logan had political aims."     WSJ
 
I could fill up 3 more pages of these quotes but as Mike Rivero @ Whatreallyhappened.com commented .. "This Logan story is a repeat the Jessica Lynch hoax used to help sell the Iraq war, only it turned out Jessica wasn’t such an innocent lady after all."  (Complete with pix of her) and I tend to agree with him.

If this wasn't a 'put up job' to throw mud on the Egyptians, Muslims, and Arabs in general, coming out of Israel through their control of the Media, it would be the first time in history !  So stay tuned folks, If I were a betting man I'd be looking for pix or videos of her with at least a black eye (from her vicious 'assault') to show up in the next few days to two weeks, even if she has to go back over and hire somebody to get one ! 

http://tundratruth.blogspot.com/p/my-stuff.html

[citizenx]

UPDATE: CBS Senior Reporter Lara Logan Was Not Raped, Resting At Home

White Center : WA : USA | Feb 16, 2011 By adamgilchrist43  10 6 Views: 11,528
 1 of 4   

This is the latest news update that CBS Senior Reporter Lara Logan is now resting at her Washington, D.C. According to the People magazine report "Logan is now resting at her Washington, D.C."...
 

..."The US network said earlier, a senior CBS correspondent is recovering in hospital in the US after she was beaten and sexually assaulted by a mob while covering the Egyptian protests.

According to a Wall Street Journal source, Logan, 39, who is mother to two young children, was not raped.


http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8208799-update-cbs-senior-reporter-lara-logan-is-ok-and-taking-rest-at-home-in-washington-she-was-not-raped

[foreverfree]

According to a Wall Street Journal source, Logan, 39, who is mother to two young children, was not raped.


http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8208799-update-cbs-senior-reporter-lara-logan-is-ok-and-taking-rest-at-home-in-washington-she-was-not-raped

you DO know that the WSJ is owned by Rupert Murdoch?  it's ALL being spun right now.  I wouldn't believe anything about this case at the moment.

[chrisfromchi]

The Wall Street Journal is an American English-language international daily newspaper published by Dow Jones & Company, a division of News Corporation

[foreverfree]

The Wall Street Journal is an American English-language international daily newspaper published by Dow Jones & Company, a division of News Corporation

very good, young padawan, but search deeper.  who owns News Corp?   search your feelings, you know it to be true!

[America2]

For some reason, I thought this whole thing stunk to high you know what the minute this story broke - I mean Lara Logan is one of the more respective and known MSM journalists, but somehow, they could get NO security around her in a very peril place, and could not nothing to prepare in advance?

I side with Dok when it comes to issues on Muslims, however, I think this whole story is bogus to begin with.

[chrisfromchi]

It should be a non-story, at least until it is really confirmed that she was even sexually assaulted at all and by whom.

I dunno whats going on. I found it disturbing when first reading it. In an environment when at the time they thought they were striking back aganist an oppressive regime I wouldn't put it past the evil people whom in this case are also muslims to do such a thing (i don't appreciate having to go PC translation with that btw) or our MIC in conjunction with ally countries conduct a propaganda stunt to demonize the average arab/egyption/iranian in the near future. Her husband is a defense contractor as well. I could go massive conspiracy but I don't like this subject and kinda half wish i never posted in the thread.

[katoomer]

the reason they are saying she wasn't raped is to protect her reputation.  She will return to work and a good clean wholesome image is important.  They want good ratings for her.  They don't want you to think shamefully about her.

  Anytime you get a crowd of hundreds of people together who may not have altogether good morals and you have a catalyzing event such as this, and emotions are high, gang rapes will happen.  Look at how many other women were raped in the previous week or two.  I think the figure was something like 50.  This is no different than a typical rock concert gang rape.  When a unsuspecting woman is swept into a throng of hundreds of crazed men.  They are surrounded by their cohorts while engaging in their crimes and they know the authorities will not try to stop them.  Its very difficult to even see into the crowd unless you are on a rooftop.

[Protean]

MSM: CIA/MI6/Mossad spin machine would want to discredit the rape story so it doesn't paint the protesters, who the MSM was/is supporting, as bad in the eyes of the general 'duped' public.
 

Plus Lara Logan, being interviewed by Jon Stewart, spoke out against the lack of coverage of the war on TV News. Coincidence she was attacked or pay-back because of her honesty?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/11/10-reasons-jon-friedman-m_n_112230.html

[citizenx]

Au contraire, it has made her sympathetic in a way that she wasn't before.  (Still isn't necessarily in my book, even though I wouldn't want such a thing to happen to anybody -- if it did happen in fact.)

Don't you think they got this story out there awfully quick?

It takes some rape victims years or decades to be ready to tell their story.

She sure got hers out fast -- or somebody did for her.

[Protean]

1. Au contraire, it has made her sympathetic in a way that she wasn't before.  (Still isn't necessarily in my book, even though I wouldn't want such a thing to happen to anybody.)

2. Don't you think they got this story out there awfully quick?

It takes some rape victims years or decades to be ready to tell their story.

She sure got hers out fast -- or somebody did for her.

1. I was referring to the positive angle on the regime change, not on her. However, though there will now be sympathy for her, there will also be a tarnished aspect, which could damage her career--hopefully not.  But this tarnished angle, may be an angle, or maybe over speculation--never-the-less--they get two for one--cry rape--then--no rape--result: public distracted from catching on to CIA Coup and damage a career for a reporter that was bucking the TV News status quo.

2. What story doesn't get out quick, if "they" want it too? Cover stories are planted before the act takes place, i.e. Col. Fletcher Prouty reported seeing Oswald named as the Killer of JFK before he was being arrested at the Texas Theater in the Australian newspapers.

[Dig]

Maybe sexually assaulted but not brutally "gang raped" by 200 Muslims as the MSM is trying to portray is as, possibly to stoke more islamophobia (possibly for a future war with Egypt/Israel).

Source
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-ZWfe5Anw

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704409004576146661656309184.html#articleTabs%3Darticle

Check the 3rd Paragraph in the article, according to a spokesman who was there or spoke to someone there "It was not a rape"

Not that a sexual assault is any better, but i think the MSM is trying to start something here.  Since the rape part is not true I am also beginning do doubt the validity of the sexual assault also.

What do you guys think?

She was raped.

CBS covered it up.

Kissinger ordered all MSM to cover it up.

The truth got out and it is being pigeonholed into some Tavistock certified "pro-muslim v. anti-muslim" BS.

This has nothing to do with islam and everything to do with making sure kissinger's coup of 80 million people went without a hitch.

He already wrote their constitution and he does not like doing paperwork for no reason.

[Dig]

Lara Logan has been critical of US News coverage of the current wars, this can't have made her popular in certain circles of government and media.

Journalists who are critical of the Bilderberg genocides have been attacked, raped, beaten, blackmailed, extorted, assassinated, beheaded, and then told it was "al-CIA-duh".

This was a Kissinger coup and you do not publish anything that will jeapordize the coup or Jabba the Hutt gets very angry!

[Dig]

I was a mob sex attack victim in Tahrir Square... just like Lara Logan
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1358759/Like-Lara-Logan-I-mob-sex-attack-victim-Tahrir-Square.html
By Angella Johnson
Last updated at 12:45 PM on 20th February 2011

Sexual harassment: MoS writer Angella Johnson was assaulted in Egypt. I was especially horrified to read of CBS journalist Lara Logan’s sex ordeal as she reported on Egyptians celebrating the toppling of President Hosni Mubarak – because I too was a victim. I was a few hundred yards away in Cairo’s Tahrir Square last Friday, unaware that Lara – whom I had worked with at GMTV – was then desperately fighting off a mob of 200 rabid men in a sustained sex assault. Now I can say what I have only told a few friends since my return: That I too was subjected to several sexual harassment attacks at the scene. Although they cannot be compared to the trauma Lara suffered, they were deeply upsetting. The first happened soon after my arrival in the square with photographer Philip Ide. At first it had seemed just the merest accidental brush of a hand on my bottom but within seconds I felt another, less hesitant stroke. I ignored it and kept moving, firmly gripping Phil’s shirt so we would not be separated in the surge of bodies. The hand behind me thrust forward again, this time boldly grasping a fair amount of jeans-clad flesh. I turned round sharply and glared at a young man who stood out in a crisp bright purple shirt but studiously avoided looking at me. He was no more than about 19. I suspected he was the culprit and in any other situation would have confronted him angrily. But in the mass of excitable men, their passions inflamed by hectoring chants and revolutionary songs blaring through speakers, I knew it could have resulted in an angry escalation. Despite numerous twists and turns around this section of the vast square, the young man’s purple shirt remained a glint in the corner of my eye. Then, using the jostling of the crowd, he lunged forward clumsily and thrust his pelvis into my behind, while holding on to my shoulder with his right hand and attempting to encircle my waist with his left. I reacted instinctively, surprising him with a sharp elbow to his torso and was rewarded with a muffled grunt. Then I grabbed Phil, explained what had happened and asked him to walk behind me for the rest of the way. Purple shirt soon gave up the chase. At this stage I didn’t feel particularly threatened or scared. Having travelled the world extensively for work and pleasure, I have been in more frightening situations. With hindsight, I realise I was also lulled into a false sense of security – as no doubt Lara was – because the crowd largely comprised happy, smiling people.  Dangerous: When it got dark, a rowdier element took to Tahrir Square Even when several youths brushed against me in an intimidating way, some muttering suggestively in Arabic, I felt more annoyance than fear. It was only later, as it grew dark and a younger, rowdier element arrived in the square, that the mood shifted to a more sinister undercurrent. These teenagers behaved like football hooligans, charging around in long conga lines. When I got caught in the middle of one particularly boisterous group, they mobbed me and several attempted to grope and fondle my body. For a moment I was nervous – I could see Phil’s head but several bodies were between us – then I got angry and pushed back. Luckily, I managed to wriggle my way out of their grasps. From my previous experiences in the Arab world, I have accepted that a minor level of sexual harassment comes with the territory, so I brushed it off. It never occurred to me to complain to my bosses. I have never wanted to give male colleagues any reason to treat me differently. A friend has said to me: 'In their minds, you and Lara were just two "infidel whores", like the ones the see in films But what happened to Lara has given women like me a chance to tell our story, like the time in South Africa when I fled a Zulu after he pushed his hand down my blouse. Or the occasion in Qatar when I fought off a sheikh in full traditional dress trying to force his way into my hotel room. I have had my breasts grabbed in Turkey, been chased by a gang of men while walking down the street in Morocco and generally treated like a piece of meat on a previous visit to Egypt. That was why I arrived in Tahrir Square armoured in jeans, a baggy, long sleeve top and with my hair covered with a knitted hat. No doubt, as a woman friend has said to me: 'In their minds, you and Lara were just two "infidel whores", the kind of sexually-liberated women they see in films and videos, or the ones who visit on holiday, get drunk and have liaisons with local men.' There are those who believe women like Lara should not cover stories where they could find themselves in danger. Some British and U.S. male commentators have suggested that in some way she was responsible for the attack because she’s petite and attractive. Others have suggested she has 'form' for dressing provocatively.  I find such comment offensive. No one ever says a male journalist asked for it if he gets beaten up.  And I could not have covered up more – apart from wearing a burka.

[citizenx]

Eyewitness: The Shocking Truth About What Happened To Lara Logan





 The place is Tahrir Square, Cairo, and the context is revolution, long sought, long expected, and long overdue. 


Nobody is perfect; we all make mistakes, and compassion is called for when reviewing the errors of others: we cannot know with certainty what another experiences in any given situation; we cannot be sure that any account is complete and unembellished, not even our own.    That kind of precision, however, is thankfully not necessary for an accurate assessment. 

What really happened to Lara Logan?
   
The  Main Stream Media's (MSM's) internal inconsistencies alone should disabuse  one of the notion of their authority. A basic, if determined, search session or two and I can tell you what did not happen: krugerrands to Krispy Kremes, she was not gang raped.  Double or nothing: she did something to get herself singled out as and accused of being an Israeli operative, a crime for which, from what I understand, discovery, trial, verdict, and sentencing are performatively implicit in the accusation itself.  In other words, they hold such crimes to be self-evident: that all Israeli spies merit being dragged off, for starters.  The dragging away and the subsequent protection by soldiers - men - let me repeat that - protection by male soldiers, not women - was a detail corroborated by another eyewitness account, personally related to me. FWIW.

Like many others who no doubt will emerge in the coming weeks, Témoris Grecko was there.


He describes in detail everything he himself observed – Read more at Ubuntu, Témoris' Blog  http://temorisblog.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/rape-women-stripped-what-really-happened-to-lara-logan/ –  and records interviews he conducted of colleagues and fellow bystanders:



Rape? Women? Stripped? What really happened to Lara Logan


I witnessed part of the mob attack against CBS’s Lara Logan at Cairo’s Tahrir square on the evening of Friday, February 11th. I was struck when I read CBS’s February 15th communiqué describing the attack as a “brutal and sustained sexual attack”, and attributing her rescue to “a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers.” This account does not fit with what I, and others, witnessed.

The TV network’s communiqué, which came rather late, as noted by Richard Cohen in The Washington Post, was promptly interpreted by many in the international media to mean rape, and in these terms it became a debate that soon adopted racist and sexist overtones. Egyptian and Muslim men are portrayed as wild beasts and Islam as an inherently violent religion. Attractive women, many commentators have said, should avoid taking on risky tasks, and if they insist, then they had it coming.
I was buying tea from a vendor in Tahrir with two friends, Amr Fekry, a 26 year old Egyptian call center agent, and Andi Walden, a San Francisco political science student. Then we heard the noise and saw the mob coming. A blonde woman, neatly dressed with a white coat, was being dragged and pushed. It didn’t seem to me she was panicking, but rather trying to control the situation. They passed us in an moment. They were yelling “agent!, agent!”

I tried to run to intervene, but some Egyptians I didn’t know prevented me from doing it.  There was nothing I could do and, as a foreign journalist, I’d surely end up being accused of being an agent too, and attacked. Fekry did go there and disappeared into the crowd, 50 or 100 people strong.

Later I spoke with two young male activists who helped the person I later learned was Lara Logan (I didn’t know her before, I don’t usually follow US networks).  They were Omar El Shennawy, a 21 year old teacher of English, and Abdulrahman Elsayed, a 25 year old teacher of physical education. They said they had formed a human chain with other young men to protect Logan, and then delivered her to the Egyptian Museum military post.

When I read CBS’s story and it’s interpretation by other media outlets, I felt troubled.  It seemed misleading. “It didn’t make sense to me”, said Benjamin Starr, from Boston who arrived as a tourist on January 24th, and stayed to witness the uprising.  He also saw the mob pass by with Lara Logan. “I want to give her the benefit of the doubt, maybe something happened in another part of the square, but from what I saw, she was being taken by men to the soldiers, and her clothes were not torn off. There were no women, I didn’t see a single woman in the crowd around her.”

Similarly, in hearing the CBS’s communiqué, Amr Fekry wrote on my Facebook wall: “It’s a little bit ridiculous what we hear that she was raped in Tahrir!! We were there! You remember she was about two meters away from us when we were buying tea! Maybe someone harassed her, but she ran and people protected her from being hit! I tried to go and help her but many people pushed me hard to go away as they thought I was trying to hit her. The only thing that some people only thought she was an Israeli spy!”

“I think it is a big exaggeration”, said Alshimaa Helmy, a 21 year old Egyptian biotechnology student and cyber-activist. “It couldn’t happen. How can someone risk to rape a foreign woman in the most important square of Egypt, in front of tens of witnesses? If those were bad guys, what about all the good people who were celebrating? She doesn’t deserve what happened to her, no one does, but if you are going to a revolution, you should protect yourself.”

I went to ask Abdulrahman Elsayed, and he related a similar account. “I was in front of her, one metre away. This was after I saw her running with a man beside her. They stopped, maybe because someone blocked their way. We formed a human chain to protect her. Only young people, 10 or 15, all men. We surrounded her. People behind us were pushing and trying to grab her, someone might have touched her. I saw her top was uneven. There was a women and children’s tent (Tahrir sq. had become a campsite) and we tried to take her there, but we couldn’t because of the pressure. Someone had a taser and he held it high, making electric noises and threatening the attackers. He told them to move away. So we could go to the Museum’s military post and deliver her to the soldiers. Then we stood there blocking the people who tried to follow her. We brought her two doctors, first a young male, then an older female. The doctor and Lara were the only women around.”

(Read more http://temorisblog.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/rape-women-stripped-what-really-happened-to-lara-logan/)

I have heard reports that corroborate this story from sources close to me.  It checks out, as it does internally. More than what can be said for other versions of the story, including the official. For the record, I am not saying Ms. Logan is responsible, although it would certainly be a ray of integrity were she to own up to it.  Or even maybe just tell us what really happened.  What a revolutionary concept.
 --------------------------------------------------------------

Remember Katrina?  The reports that surfaced of gangs raping women openly? They were false too. Maybe somebody needs better porn.  Which reminds me, let us not forget who watches the most porn in America, i.e., what community standards really indicate -- that rank steaming lies such as the Lara Logan story can ruin lives, wreck careers (even if people admit they were wrong - par for the course in f**ked up America), and land innocent people in jail (here's another example).  This could get someone killed.


But only if those who know the truth stand silently by, and do nothing.


entire article:

http://femalefaust.blogspot.com/2011/02/eyewitness-shocking-truth-about-what.html

[Dig]

"...protection by soldiers - men - let me repeat that - protection by male soldiers..."

A blonde woman, neatly dressed with a white coat, was being dragged and pushed.

They were yelling “agent!, agent!”

I tried to run to intervene, but some Egyptians I didn’t know prevented me from doing it.  There was nothing I could do and, as a foreign journalist, I’d surely end up being accused of being an agent too, and attacked. Fekry did go there and disappeared into the crowd, 50 or 100 people strong.

They said they had formed a human chain with other young men to protect Logan, and then delivered her to the Egyptian Museum military post.

Maybe someone harassed her, but she ran and people protected her from being hit! I tried to go and help her but many people pushed me hard to go away as they thought I was trying to hit her. The only thing that some people only thought she was an Israeli spy!”

She doesn’t deserve what happened to her, no one does, but if you are going to a revolution, you should protect yourself.”

“I was in front of her, one metre away. This was after I saw her running with a man beside her. They stopped, maybe because someone blocked their way. We formed a human chain to protect her. Only young people, 10 or 15, all men. We surrounded her. People behind us were pushing and trying to grab her, someone might have touched her. I saw her top was uneven. There was a women and children’s tent (Tahrir sq. had become a campsite) and we tried to take her there, but we couldn’t because of the pressure. Someone had a taser and he held it high....”

WTF?!?!?!?!

She was standing around and some people targeted her and then a swarm of young men began to sexually harrass her, tear off her clothes and from others' account, rape her. Everyone seems to coroborate with most of the story. The only difference seems to be what the definition of "protection" is.

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYONE BEING MUSLIM. THERE MUST BE AT LEAST 10,000 CIA/MI6 OPERATIVES ALONG WITH THOUSANDS OF OTHERS FROM GOVERNORS' ISLAND' PROJECT TO CREATE SMART MOBS BY PROFESSOR NYE AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY AND THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION.

The whole reason that CBS covered up the story is because Kissinger/CSIS/RAND/Brookings/CFR declared that no negative publicity was to be allowed until the coup d'etat planned by remnants of Iran-Contra was complete. And even now that everyone knows this was a military totalitarianism coup coordinated by noosphere nazi psychos...they still cannot handle even .0000000000000000000000000001% possibly negative publicity.

THis is all about MYTH BUILDING and has nothing to do with reality. Professor Nye brags about how comprehensive the plan was back in 2009!

We are not engaging in nation building, we are manufacturing MYTHOLOGIES!
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=202213.0

[citizenx]

Mythologies, indeed, mythologies.

Like the Neocon/Zionist Extremist (Ultra Zionist) myth of Muslims being bestial subhuman and misogynistic brutes capable of mass-raping a woman reporter in the middle of a public square while celbrating the removal of their dictator after 30 years and despite eyewitnesses to the contrary.

Mythologies.

Well, I'll repect your opinion on this one, but I have got to say I am not in the mood to be hammered into submission on this one either, Dig.

I'll just say there are reasons to question both sides of this story -- and the story definitely has two sides.



In any event, even 200 alleged Egyptian rapists deserve a day in court and a jury of their peers and the presumption of innocence, even if it was a white American woman (and a wealthy one at that) that was supposedly raped that day in Tahrir Square.

That's because I am an American and that is the American way.

But if we are going to try them right here on Prison Planet Forum, then yes, sign me up for the defense -- unless they don't deserve one of those either.

There you go.  No big bold letters.  No all upper case.  That's what I have to say and I said it.

[Dig]

Mythologies, indeed, mythologies.

Like the Neocon/Zionist Extremist (Ultra Zionist) myth of Muslims being bestial subhuman and misogynistic brutes capable of mass-raping a woman reporter in the middle of a public square while celbrating the removal of their dictator after 30 years and despite eyewitnesses to the contrary.

Like the RAND Corporation mythology that must promote the idea that reports of rape are only fabricated by MI6 controlled zionists who push the idea that muslims are subhumsn. How can you possibly be this ignorant...

ZIONIST = NAZI = MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD = CHRISTIAN RIGHT

All of them hijack every monotheistic religion and radicalize the masses who believe in their respective faiths. The purpose has already been defined by RAND Corporation..."Clash of Civilizations" to destroy any power structure in the world so that the Noosphere can become the new electronic terrain where everyone must continually comply with watever orders the eye of fatima dictates.

They are all controlled by RAND Corporation and orders are dictated by remnants of the East India Trading Company. Every "revolution" is transforming peaceful nations into MI6 "Al-CIA-duh" controlled territories... THIS IS THE PLAN AND THE ZIONISTS, THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, THE NEOCONS, AND THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT'S TOP LEADERS ARE ALL WORKING TOGETHER ON IT. HOW ELSE IS THIS EVEN POSSIBLE TO HAVE REGIME CHANGES IN 10 COUNTRIES IN LESS THAN 3 MONTHS? Every time someone says rape, you say "yeah muslims are all subhuman...blah blah blah" IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE KEY PEOPLE MOLESTING HER WERE MI6 ASSETS AND MIGHT BE FRICKING ATHIESTS! THEY MIGHT EVEN BE JEWISH! WHO THE HELL KNOWS? Muslim Brotherhood is MI6. One of the top leaders of Al-Qaeda is the grandson of the founder of the Anti-Defamation League.

Mythologies. Well, I'll repect your opinion on this one, but I have got to say I am not in the mood to be hammered into submission on this one either, Dig. I'll just say there are reasons to question both sides of this story -- and the story definitely has two sides.

What sides...she was molested and the MSM covered it up. I mean WTF, in a city of over 500,000 people crimes are committed. And even though the use of RAND's "Smart Mobs" is now confirmed, you are believing the MSM's reports that this was an 18 day Woodstock concert where everyone had flowers in their hair and were singing "Kumbaya". This was a next generation operation almost Manson-esque in the mind control and trancelike nature of the marauding gangs (as Rockefeller Foundation 2012 report explains in detail).

In any event, even 200 alleged Egyptian rapists deserve a day in court and a jury of their peers and the presumption of innocence, even if it was a white American woman (and a wealthy one at that) that was supposedly raped that day in Tahrir Square.

She was an NWO target for her reporting of negative publicity. She is being reported in the "Myth Builder" media as a "wealthy white woman". WTF, are you getting Rachel Maddow talking points or something?

That's because I am an American and that is the American way.

Actually, you insult Americans by saying that (I guess that is your intention). You are following the Rothschild press to the letter by saying "either she was raped and all muslims are rapists or she was not raped because zionists want to paint muslims in a bad light"

How about: "she was sexually moelsted by NATO controlled marauding "smart mobs" and it has absolutely nothing to do with Islam, Muslims, or rich white women."

This was all about peaceful sovereign Muslim countries being too peaceful and the New World Order needing to shake things up for the next level of global conflict.

But if we are going to try them right here on Prison Planet Forum, then yes, sign me up for the defense -- unless they don't deserve one of those either.

Try who? Who exactly are you talking about? Try MI6? You really want to defend MI6 manufacturing civil wars in sovereign countries?

All that happened was that there is an MI6/CIA manufactured revolt to conduct regime changes. Within the chaos, many crimes are committed. But they are not allowed to be publicized because it will jeapordize MI6/CIA's mission.

That is why CBS (Sumner Redstone...NOT A MUSLIM) refused to report about their own journalist.

So go ahead and defend the MI6's insanity in obeying the Committee of 300's orders to conduct these coup d'etat where innocents die and get raped during the chaos.

Please defend MI6, I really want to understand why these MI6 controlled operations are justified.

There you go.  No big bold letters.  No all upper case.  That's what I have to say and I said it.

Not really sure what you said except that you think MI6 causing coups in sovereign lands is A-OK and if other people do not support your undying love for these psycho freakazoid unintelligence operatives then they must be zionists who hate all muslims. dude, get away from all the myth building nonsense.

[citizenx]

Like the RAND Corporation mythology that must promote the idea that reports of rape are only fabricated by MI6 controlled zionists who push the idea that muslims are subhumsn. How can you possibly be this ignorant...

No there are real rapes.  This "molestation" is not necessarily one of them.

As for ignorant -- you are helping to perpetuate one of the basest, most bigoted prejudices on the Planet Earth right now.

That is f**king ignorant IMO.

You may as well be one of the Neocons, Ultra Zionists or their useful idiots.

That is what you are -- one of their various heavy-handed gatekeepers, nothing else.

I don't know how I've held off saying that for so long.

Go ahead -- delete this post, this thread.

It doesn't matter.  The truth willl remain the truth.  In all likelihood you will remain as you are and I will remain as I am.

I think I've had enough of this ride.

It is sad that the whole internet is nothing but a big echo chamber for folks like you, but that really is the case.

Nobody is doing shit as the world burns.  By design.

[Dig]

No there are real rapes.  This "molestation" is not necessarily one of them.  As for ignorant -- you are helping to perpetuate one of the basest, most bigoted prejudices on the Planet Earth right now. That is f**king ignorant IMO. You may as well be one of the Neocons, Ultra Zionists or their useful idiots. That is what you are -- one of their various heavy-handed gatekeepers, nothing else. I don't know how I've held off saying that for so long. Go ahead -- delete this post, this thread. It doesn't matter.  The truth willl remain the truth.  In all likelihood you will remain as you are and I will remain as I am. I think I've had enough of this ride. It is sad that the whole internet is nothing but a big echo chamber for folks like you, but that really is the case. Nobody is doing shit as the world burns.  By design.

So if someone does not agree with your opinion that she made up the story then that person is as good as a "Neocons, Ultra Zionists or their useful idiots" and "one of their various heavy-handed gatekeepers"? And you are saying that argument is not ignorant? And also this statement is really top quality:  "you are helping to perpetuate one of the basest, most bigoted prejudices on the Planet Earth right now". What prejudice is that exactly? The prejudice that uses an entire race of people to blame for the terrorist attacks of 9/11 which were executed by Eurocrat banksters? The prejudice that has killed over 1,000,000 innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan? Here is a clue to what is going on...The Federal Reserve is not federal and there is no reserve. Al-Qaeda is controlled by European Banksters just like MI6/CIA/Mossad Muslim Brotherhood is also controlled by MI6, this has been a fact for over 30 years. Zionists also are controlled by the same interests and promote the same goals.

And your final apathetic assessment seems the most bizarre because it is a reminder of Club of Rome's "Time and Morale":

"It is sad that the whole internet is nothing but a big echo chamber for folks like you, but that really is the case. Nobody is doing shit as the world burns.  By design."

Dude...I am a monkey punching keys...no more and no less. Don't believe anything I posted, research for yourself. Just read this document to see why they need everyone in North Africa and the Middle East to be on the Internet and wired for future conflicts:

***MUST READ: Wael Ghonim exposé. "Revolution 2.0" carried out cybernetically
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=201020.0

The Emergence of Noopolitik:  Toward an American Information Strategy
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=202428.0

We are not engaging in nation building, we are manufacturing MYTHOLOGIES!
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=202213.0

[Dig]

Just for sanity's sake...
US Marines, Warships Head to Libya
http://nation.foxnews.com/troop-deployment/2011/03/01/us-marines-warships-head-libya
March 01, 2011

"Tuesday, the U.S. ordered two warships and 1200 Marines to the waters off of Libya"

It is a big party for the Pentagon and the millions of people on the streets are cannon fodder for the New World Order. The media keeps promoting this shit, hundreds of millions of Muslim people are being swept up in these DARPA/RAND "smart" revolutions. They are set to mimic the Russian and Chinese revolutions. The ones who will be most affected are the ones you claim I am being prejudiced against. I am trying to let people read the actual documents from over 10 years ago outlining these exact plans.

[chrisfromchi]

hmm yesterday i saw a story saying it was 400 marines

[Kilika]

A big mistake being made from the start about the Lara Logan story is in thinking the crowds were exclusively Muslim. I suspect many in those crowds weren't even Muslim. What they say happened is not what happened. Just more media spin.

[Dig]

Why was Lara Logan targeted by RAND Corporation's "Smart Mobs"?

The latest in a series of recent high-profile media "mea culpas," CBS News chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan told Jon Stewart she'd "blow her brains out" if forced to watch what passes for TV news coverage in America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CT-Hq117w8s

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-17-2008/lara-logan


She slams "the war you don't see" which was the title of a recent John Pilger docuementary:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=196657.0


And as far as RAND Corporation "smart mobs" and "swarms"...they have been planned for years....

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=202213.0

The largest think tanks have been running experiments for over 10 years on how to conduct such operations using short sustained triggers to influence people (like a text messaging system...like twitter):

http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/1/4/2.html


This is the "Dark Side" of Professor Nye's Noosphere/Noopolitik "smart mob" of Google/Twitter sense and response Nazi Zombies...

the future Nuernberg trials defense...



"we were just following the orders given to us by someone we never met for a cause that has no formal plan"