>>Excluding RP 1/6,FOX loses>$3Bil/State GOP withdraws as FOX debate partner<<

[JTCoyoté]

From: Kent Snyder - Chairman of Ron Paul 2008

December 30, 2007
Has Fox News Excluded Ron Paul? pt. 2
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

On December 27, the Associated Press reported:  "The New Hampshire Republican Party is sponsoring a forum for Republican presidential candidates on Jan. 6, two days before the state's first-in-the-nation primary."  Later in the article, the AP stated:  "Participating in the forum will be Rudy Giuliani, Mike Huckabee, John McCain,  Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson."

On the evening of December 28, Jared Chicoine and Jordan Brown of our New Hampshire campaign staff met in person with Fergus Cullen the New Hampshire GOP chairman to discuss whether or not Dr. Paul would be invited to participate in the forum.  Mr. Cullen confirmed there will be an event on January 6, but he could not confirm whether or not Dr. Paul would be invited. We also learned the event would not be a debate with an audience, but instead would be a forum in a closed studio with the candidates questioned only by Chris Wallace of Fox News.

A few hours after that meeting, we contacted Fox News seeking clarification.  Later that night, we issued a press release while waiting to hear from Fox News.

On December 29, the Baltimore Sun featured a report by Jason George. Mr. George reported, "Calls and emails to Fox News spokespersons by the Tribune were not returned Saturday evening.

"An official at the New Hampshire GOP, which is co-sponsoring the event with Fox, said that Paul might still be included, but the planning for the debate was still coming together and it was ultimately Fox's call."

As of late afternoon today (December 30), we have nothing more to report.

Kent Snyder
Chairman, Ron Paul 2008

Thanks for putting this up Sandy... It is nice to know that the Campaign has it all wired and the heavyweights are getting the "Debate/Round-table" Semantical-OP squelched... We can now "castrate" the crooks through the network... There are 6000 of us here that are active on smaller satellite boards both left and right... let's get the truth out!

JTCoyoté

"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power
any government has is the power to crack down on
criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals,
one makes them. One declares so many things to be
a crime that it becomes impossible to live without
breaking laws." ~Ayn Rand

[Dig]

Michael Steele LT Govt Maryland is a strong ohahve TZion
http://blackzionists.blogspot.com/2007/01/michael-steele-lt-govt-maryland-is.html

Michael Steele came down squarely on the side of Israel in its conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon and called for more time for diplomatic efforts. As a sovereign nation, Israel has the right to defend itself, said Steele. "Israel was attacked. I've been appalled by the fact that people seem to play that down and have gotten to the point where they are now blaming Israel for what's happening. A cease-fire will come on terms that are hopefully favorable to both sides, but certainly on terms that will not put Israel at greater harm or disadvantage," he said.

Because Hezbollah is a terrorist organization, Israel's strong reaction is justified, he said. "You don't give them any leverage or any upper hand in any conflict you have with them," Steele said. "Your goal should be to take them out. Period. As quickly as you can."

[JTCoyoté]

Here is the traitor at the night of the debate where he cked the shit out of Mr. 9/11:

Hannity and Colmes - Michael Steel Smears Ron Paul (sound sux)

4 min - May 21, 2007 -  (16 ratings)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjt-_j86QkU


What A Difference A Day Makes
(After we phone called him to explain what he was talking about he apologized and changed his tune, but a snake does not change its scales to feathers!)

1 min - Dec 20, 2007 -  (65 ratings)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srabVeRT26k

Nor a leopard his spots... Great find Sane... (chuckle)...

--Oldyoti

"The threat posed BY humans to the natural environment
is nothing compared to the threat TO humans
posed by global environmental policy."
~Fred L. Smith

[Dig]

He needs to f**king resign.  He needs to resign before a grand jusry indicts him for treason!

[Dig]

Barney Keller:
http://www.thesunblog.com/community/

Barney Keller, former press secretary for Tsongas' unsuccessful Republican opponent, Jim Ogonowski, also has gone north.  After cutting his teeth during Ogonowski's formidable challenge to Tsongas, Keller has signed on for a year with the New Hampshire GOP.  Keller will focus on ousting first-term Democratic Rep. Carol Shea-Porter and helping Sen. John Sununu, who faces a challenge from Democratic former Gov. Jean Shaheen. Shaheen lost to Sununu in 2002
__________________________________
I’ll be on Greater Boston’s “Beat the Press” (yes, you heard right) tomorrow
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:t8dbt3TCfNEJ:peruseme.com/politics/index.php/search/gm%2Bspokesman
October 11th, 2007

Remember that little incident where Charley and I got booted from the MA-05 debate at NECN, at the request of the Ogo campaign?  Well, like any good tempest in a teapot, this one isn’t going away.  One of the segments in tomorrow’s “Beat the Press” on WGBH will feature yours truly in the taped piece, followed by Emily Rooney and her merry band discussing what it all means for bloggers, traditional media, and politicians.  It’s actually kind of an interesting question. And speaking of which, I had somehow missed the Lowell Sun’s brief write-up of the incident, which features a totally hilarious quote from Barney Keller:
“Supporters weren’t allowed in the studio,” Ogonowski spokesman Barney Keller said. “They’re her supporters, and they broke the rules.”

Uh, Barney?  How was it, exactly, that we “broke” the “rules”?  Did we bamboozle NECN into believing that we were not taking sides in this race, perhaps by […]

[Dig]

What is GOPAC?
http://www.motherjones.com/news/special_reports/coinop_congress/eye_on_newt/GOPAC.html
GOPAC is a political action committee, or PAC, established in 1979 by then-governor Pierre "Pete" Dupont of Delaware. Newt Gingrich assumed control of GOPAC in 1986 and transformed it into an 800-pound gorilla of political organizing with a $2 million annual budget. GOPAC has raised more than $8 million since 1991 though this figure may actually be higher since GOPAC doesn't release its list of contributors to the public. (So we did--see our leaked major donor list.) Despite receiving credit for playing a major role in the 1994 Republican takeover of the House, GOPAC claims that most of its money is used to help elect Republican candidates for state offices, which would free the organization from disclosing its finances or observing federal limits on the size and source of campaign contributions.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) disagrees and is suing GOPAC in federal court over the issue. In fact, there's ample evidence that GOPAC is intentionally skirting federal elections rules to avoid disclosing contributions and to collect contributions from wealthy individuals that far exceed annual federal election limits. GOPAC did not even register as a federal PAC until 1991, two years after it allegedly began supporting federal candidates.

After it registered with the FEC, GOPAC released only 10 percent of its donor list, claiming that it represented the percentage of its resources going to congressional candidates. Additionally, in the states where GOPAC did file a list of supporters, a deceptive pattern of recycled contributions emerges, with the same $40,000 in contributions from eight businessmen reported over and over again in at least six different states.   Forced to refile under public pressure, GOPAC began making donor names public beginning with November 1994 contributions. Gingrich has also had to backpedal on his claim that he didn't personally receive any GOPAC money, acknowledging two trips he took with his wife that he initially failed to disclose GOPAC's funding of. But where did the rest of GOPAC's unreported millions go?  The relationships between GOPAC and Gingrich's other main political enterprises (his college course "Renewing American Civilization" and his nonprofit Progress & Freedom Foundation) have led to pending House ethics charges. In May 1995, Gingrich stepped down as GOPAC chairman in an apparent effort to distance himself from these controversies.

[Dig]

Clinton's "Soviet connection," GOPAC and power to destroy the integrty of impeachment
http://www.salon.com/news/1998/04/07newsb.html
GOP MONEY MAN DISCUSSED DIGGING UP DIRT ON CLINTON.
BY MURRAY WAAS

Peter W. Smith, a conservative political activist and major fund-raiser for House Speaker Newt Gingrich, discussed underwriting an investigative effort during the 1996 presidential campaign to obtain information about a college trip that President Clinton made to the Soviet Union in 1969, Salon has learned.  Conservative critics of President Clinton have long circulated rumors that Clinton might have protested against the Vietnam War during his 1969 trip to the former Soviet Union, or that he even had discussions with Soviet officials. During the 1992 presidential race, then-President George Bush suggested that Clinton might have done something unpatriotic, saying that Clinton should disclose to voters "how many demonstrations he led against his own country from a foreign soil."  During the time that Clinton made the trip to the Soviet Union he was attending Oxford as a Rhodes scholar. No evidence has ever come to light showing that he did anything improper during his Soviet trip.

Smith, a Chicago investment banker, discussed probing Clinton's Soviet trip in a meeting with other conservative activists, sources said. The sources, two of whom participated in the discussions, said that Clinton's trip was only one of a number of issues that Smith thought worthy of investigation.  Other topics that Smith discussed, the sources said, included allegations that Clinton, while governor of Arkansas, ordered state law-enforcement officials to turn a blind eye to a cocaine smuggling ring. Two official investigations of the matter -- by the House Banking Committee and the CIA Inspector General -- have found no wrongdoing by the president.  Smith did not return Salon's telephone calls yesterday.  Last week, the New York Observer revealed that Smith spent at least $80,000 to fund an investigation of the president's sexual conduct, from September 1992 to March 1994. Those efforts were to prove instrumental in the publication of the so-called Arkansas "Troopergate" story.  It was Smith who introduced then-American Spectator reporter David Brock to the troopers, who told salacious stories about Clinton's private life that appeared in the Spectator and the Los Angeles Times in December 1993. Smith also promised two of the troopers high-paying jobs if they were fired for speaking to the press. And in March 1994, he wrote a $20,000 check that was split between two of the troopers and their attorney.

Over the last decade, according to Federal Election Commission records, Smith has made more than $150,000 in contributions to GOPAC, the conservative political committee once chaired by House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Smith has also been a top donor to the Republican National Committee.  Smith was assisted in his efforts to promote the Troopergate story by political consultant Eddie Mahe, a close friend and advisor to House Speaker Gingrich. Mahe has also served as a consultant to GOPAC.  In an interview Monday, Mahe said he received $25,000 in consulting fees from Smith over a two-year period for assisting in the Troopergate effort. He also provided new details about his role in the affair, saying he was paid by Smith to help attract interest in the story by a major news organization.  "I evaluated what they came up with to see if there was any way it could be packaged in a way that the establishment press might be attracted to the story," Mahe said.  Mahe said that he did not recall Smith ever discussing the president's trip to the former Soviet Union.  Now a communications and business consultant, Mahe also said that neither he nor Smith ever discussed their efforts with Gingrich. A spokesperson for the speaker did not return telephone calls Monday.  Conservative political activists said that Smith and Mahe had become close friends through their work with GOPAC, the political action committee then chaired by Gingrich.  Smith's role with GOPAC is also described in internal GOPAC records. In a Nov. 14, 1990, letter, a high-level GOPAC official wrote to Smith about a recent meeting between Smith, his wife and the GOPAC official:  "It was great to have you and Karin with us this past weekend ... Your participation is one of the reasons our operations continue so successfully.  "It is a painful time to be a Republican. I talked with many Charter Members at the meeting who are feeling confused, frustrated, and a bit angry. Newt supposes that we have a one in three chance of gaining control of the House in 1992.  "Protracted conflict is costly and trying. We don't promise it will be easy."

[Dig]

MASTER OF THE HOUSE
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,133563,00.html

 As the head of GOPAC, the Republican political action committee he led from 1986 until last May, he studied the ways and means of campaign cash flow as assiduously as he plotted the G.O.P. victory in Congress. With his party now in power, Gingrich's new goal was to give his permanent revolution a permanent fund-raising machine, each part of which would be overseen by a lieutenant. That machine has perfected the art of the shakedown. Whip Tom DeLay of Texas actually keeps a book in his office listing how much the 400 largest special-interest pacs gave to either party in the past two years and makes sure contributors to the Democrats are marked down in his book as "unfriendly." Representative John Boehner of Ohio is in charge of orchestrating how interest-group lobbyists can raise cash to promote the Contract. What do the lobbyists get in return? Awe-inspiring access to the legislative process, including the right to write the bills themselves, like the one passed last February that imposed a 13-month moratorium on federal regulations. During floor debate, the Gucci set stood close by, typing out on their laptop computers the talking points that Republican leaders would use on the floor. Gingrich's money operation is now purring: during the first six months of this year House Republicans received nearly 60% of the campaign contributions given by the top 400 pacs. Last year Democrats got two-thirds of such contributions.

[Dig]

What a shame the whole thing was. The audience was mostly GOPAC:
http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/05/16/ron-paul-gains-support-in-second-gop-debate/
On their homepage:

“We have reserved tickets for all GOPAC Charter Members to attend the debate in South Carolina. As a Charter Member, you will see the candidates first hand as they debate the issues in front of a world audience.”

The chairman of GOPAC is named Michael Steele, whom Giuliani campaigned for, and he is the one that declared Ron Paul to be “done” after the debate.

Gee, no wonder Giuliani got such a pop from the crowd. The whole thing was a sham. The media tells us we are crazy to believe that Ron Paul’s supporters are sophisticated haxxors makind a concentrated effort to spam polls but I’m supposed to believe that this “debate” was nothing but a farse?

[Dig]

Michael Steele, FOX News Contributor and GOPAC Chairman, Doesn’t Know The US Constitution
http://www.newshounds.us/2007/07/08/michael_steele_fox_news_contributor_and_gopac_chairman_doesnt_know_the_us_constitution.php
Reported by Ellen - July 8, 2007 - 184 comments 

Michael Steele’s GOPAC biography says he has a law degree from the prestigious Georgetown University. But on Friday night’s (7/6/07) Hannity & Colmes, Steele seemed ignorant of the most basic applications of the United States Constitution as he erroneously stated that our enemies do not have rights under it. With video. It was another FOX News discussion that tried to take the heat off President Bush by attacking Democrats, this time for having called the president “radical” and “brain dead.” However, Alan Colmes, who started the discussion, was at the top of his game and neatly turned it back to Bush’s record. “Michael, when you have a guy – they want to redefine torture – anything short of organ failure and death is OK, they start a war against a country that’s not a threat to the United States… they wiretap Americans without a warrant, they render people to other countries so they can be tortured there and then deny it. That IS radical, isn’t it?” Steele dismissed those concerns by saying, “Alan, what are you whining about now?” He rehashed the old “at a time of war” argument, implying that anything goes so long as you can make the case that it’s a time of war. Colmes persisted. “We still have a Constitution during a war… Do we have a Constitution during a war? … Do you want to suspend Habeas Corpus? …Michael, do you believe the Constitution does not exist during a time of war?” Steele replied, “Oh, come on, Alan. Of course the Constitution exists at a time of war, but our enemies do not have rights under our Constitution, thank you very much.” Colmes pointed out the error, “Actually, that’s not true. In fact, in our country, if you’re in the United States, the Constitution pertains, Ellis (Henican, the other guest), to persons, not to citizens, according to Judge Napolitano.” Comment: Colmes is correct. You can read the U.S. Constitution here and the Bill of Rights here. Steele yelled something about not being in the United States and then, “Come on, man.” But, clearly, most of what Colmes cited occurred in the United States. Rich Lowry, subbing for Sean Hannity, made the discussion even more ridiculous as he tried to pound Henican into admitting, “yes or no” whether or not he was as outraged over Bill Clinton’s pardons as he is over President Bush’s commutation of Scooter Libby’s sentence. As Henican repeated that he couldn't say because he hadn’t thought about any of Clinton's pardons for years, Lowry seemed more unreasonable with his insistance on ignoring Bush and attacking over Clinton. “When in doubt, bring up Bill Clinton. That’s always the rule,” Colmes said at the end of the discussion.
_______________________________________

BIO
http://www.gopac.org/chairmanscorner/bio.aspx

The Honorable Michael Steele

GOPAC Chairman Michael Steele was born on October 19, 1958 at Andrews Air Force Base in Prince George's County and was raised in Washington, DC. He graduated from Archbishop Carroll High School, earned his bachelor's degree in International Relations from Johns Hopkins University in 1981 and his law degree from Georgetown University Law Center in 1991. Mr. Steele also spent three years as a seminarian in the Order of St. Augustine in preparation for the priesthood.

In 2003, Chairman Steele earned a place in history when he became the first African American elected to statewide office in Maryland. Hhe was nation's highest-ranking African American Republican elected official and the only sitting African American Lt. Governor in the country.

In 2002, President George W. Bush appointed Chairman Steele to serve a term on the Board of Visitors of the United States Naval Academy. Other affiliations include the State House Trust, the East Baltimore Development Corporation, the Export-Import Bank Advisory Committee and the Prince George's County Chapter of the NAACP.

Among the distinguished awards and honors received by Chairman Steele, he has been named a 2005 Aspen Institute-Rodel Fellow in Public Leadership and was awarded a Bethune-DuBois Institute 2005 Award for his work in the ongoing development of quality education in Maryland.

Chairman Steele is a member of St. Mary's Catholic Church in Landover Hills, MD, where he attends mass regularly with his wife Andrea and their two sons, Michael and Drew.
____________________________________
Happy Holidays from GOPAC!
http://www.gopac.org/chairmanscorner/

As millions of Americans and others across the world prepare to celebrate the Holiday Season and welcome in a new year, I just wanted to take a few moments to say thank you for making GOPAC a success.

From the time I took over as Chairman of GOPAC in the beginning of 2007 I have been amazed with the commitment of our members. GOPAC has been committed to training and electing Republicans across the country and has had great success in my first year. GOPAC continues to operate due to your commitment and donation, and we never forget those who donate and work hard on our behalf.

With 2007 coming to a close, please accept my sincere appreciation for all your donations, comments, suggestions, and feedback. With the launch of our new website we have seen more involvement then ever and our growth is due to the wonderful team at GOPAC and the terrific support all of you have given us.

In 2008, we will continue to move forward by continuing our trainings across the country and working to elect more Republicans to office. 2008 is an important year for Republicans and I can guarantee that GOPAC will do everything in its means to make sure we move forward again and start to take back seats we lost in 2006.

I hope these holidays find you in the company of close friends and family. From all of us at GOPAC, Season Greetings and a Happy New Year!

Sincerely,

                                                                     
Michael S. Steele
Chairman
_____________________________________
Steele's schedule where he will try to censor Paul again!
http://www.gopac.org/chairmanscorner/
Chairman Steele travels and appears at events all over the country, so be sure to check back for upcoming Steele Sightings in your area!

Sunday, January 06, 2008 Event:Breakfast Speaker - NH GOP Location: Amhurst, NH

Thursday, January 17, 2008 Event:Special Guest at ABC -MD Pac Fundraiser Location: Double Tree Hotel Annapolis, MD 21401
Thursday, January 24, 2008 Event:Kansas 4th Congressional District Reception Location: Wichita, KS
Friday, January 25, 2008 Event:Keynote Dwight D Eisenhower Public Service Series Location: Topeka, KS
Saturday, January 26, 2008 Event:   Keynote - Florida YR's Reagan Day Dinner Location: Orlando, FL
Saturday, February 02, 2008 Event:Keynote Ronald Reagan Conservative Society Location: Adams Mark Hotel Dallas, TX
Tuesday, February 12, 2008  Event:   Keynote: Lincoln Club of Colorado  Location: Denver, CO

[larsonstdoc]

NOW I AM REALLY CONFUSED!

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59442

[Dig]

NOW I AM REALLY CONFUSED!

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59442

We covered it WND jumped the gun (remember that Ann Coulter was/is a major contributor).

Just backtrack on this thread and see how the following are guilty of fixing the electoral process:

Michael Steele
GOPAC
COP NH
FOX
Barney Keller

[larsonstdoc]

FAUX NEWS-  We Distort, You Decipher


      What a twisted, convoluted mess.  Put a tent over that circus!  They are afraid, very afraid of Ron Paul, the people's candidate and champion of the Constitution.

[Dig]

FAUX NEWS-  We Distort, You Decipher


      What a twisted, convoluted mess.  Put a tent over that circus!  They are afraid, very afraid of Ron Paul, the people's candidate and champion of the Constitution.

"We distort. You comply"
http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2003/06/26/faux_news/index.html
Even in a down economy, there are some business models that still work --
selling T-shirts comparing Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly to Hitler, for example.
By Katharine Mieszkowski


Jun 26, 2003 | Nothing boosts lefty T-shirt sales like an officious, bullying cease-and-desist letter from Fox News.  Agitproperties.com in Austin, Texas, sells "Faux News Channel" T-shirts that mock the Fox logo with the slogan "We distort. You comply." The company is an equal-opportunity network mocker -- it also sells "Pentagon News Network" T-shirts parodying the CNN logo.  But those two offerings are positively subtle compared to the T-shirt that puts a Hitler Youth spin on Fox fulminator Bill O'Reilly. A strapping young blond man brandishing a flag emblazoned with the words "news channel" is bracketed with the slogan "Fair and Balanced" and the title "O'Reilly Youth."  Lest anyone start thinking Bill O'Reilly has actually begun recruiting for his own fascist youth brigade, the site displays a prominent disclaimer right on the home page: "This Web site and the merchandise sold herein are parodies and as such are political satire protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. Agitproperties.com is not connected with, approved or endorsed by Fox News Network LLC ..." and so on.

But Fox isn't convinced.
In a letter dated June 19, 2003, Christopher Silvestri, senior counsel for the network, accused Agitproperties.com of trademark infringement and ordered the company to stop selling the shirts. "Furthermore, the T-shirt 'O'Reilly Youth tee,' in addition to the infringements described herein, shows incredibly poor taste on your part, is highly offensive and clearly demonstrates your bad faith use of the Fox Copyrights and Trademarks," Silvestri wrote.  The guys at Agitproperties think that's pretty funny: "Now isn't that a hoot: to be accused of 'incredibly poor taste' by a representative of the network responsible for such benchmarks of good taste such as 'Temptation Island 3,' 'Joe Millionaire' and 'Stupid Behavior Caught on Tape,'" they wrote in a press release detailing the contretemps.  Richard Luckett, 46, a graphic designer in Austin -- "deep in enemy territory," he says -- started selling the shirts on street corners with his two partners, Brad First, a nightclub manager, and Rick Elms, an Austin bartender, at antiwar rallies in Washington and San Francisco earlier this year.  On their Web site, they feature links to news stories from around the world, along with incitements to buy their liberal propaganda. "I wanted to be an antidote to the mainstream U.S. media," says Luckett, who spent 20 years on the road as a merchandiser for bands like Duran Duran and Stevie Ray Vaughan.

But as Baghdad fell, so did T-shirt sales.  
"After the so-called victory, all of a sudden our traffic and our sales just went to nothing. We were sitting around wondering what we should do and we got this cease-and-desist order from Fox," says Luckett.  You'd think the lawyers at Fox News were moonlighting for the marketing department of agitproperties.com.  As word of the cease-and-desist letter spread around liberal blogs, traffic to the site went from 300 people a day to 41,000. "I went from having five mentions on Google to six pages in 24 hours," says Luckett, who says that he's taken $3,000 worth of T-shirt orders in the last 24 hours.  The site has attracted so much traffic that by Thursday morning it was shut down temporarily for consuming too much bandwidth. The site was back up by Thursday afternoon.  Agitproperties.com hasn't formally responded to Fox's letter yet, but plans to. "Fox expected a tiny little company in Austin, Texas, to just roll over. This is definitely without a doubt a First Amendment issue. Americans should be free to speak their minds," says Luckett.  Robert Zimmerman, spokesperson for Fox News said only: "We don't comment on legal matters."  If Fox does decide to defend its copyright against the likes of the O'Reilly youth T-shirt in court, could the network have a case? Although the T-shirt peddlers say that they're just trying to make enough money from the shirts to keep their tiny alternative media site up and running, could they be prosecuted for profiting from Fox's trademark?  "The question is not whether they're selling the shirts for profit or not," says Fred Von Lohmann, senior staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "The real question is: Are people going to be confused? If you look at a T-shirt and it's clearly lampooning the trademark, no one is going to be confused. Then, the First Amendment gives you more protection.  "Trademark law is intended to protect the public from confusion," he says. "It's not intended to protect Bill O'Reilly from offensive comments about his program."

[Dig]

Feel free to get involved with this wiki:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Fox_News

[Dig]

FOX News Station Confirms it on Live TV!!!!!!

Ron Paul Fox Covers Fox Censorship New Hampshire Forum Jan 6

2 min - Dec 31, 2007 -  (30 ratings)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCAYRWIcPKQ

Story by Fox affiliate station KPTM in Omaha, NE. covering exclusion of Ron Paul from the Fox and New Hampshire GOP sponsored Repuplican Candidates Forum to be held on Jan. 6th in New Hampshire, and the onlaught of Ron Paul supporters expressing discontent for this blatant act of cencorship.

[Dig]

Be prepared to stay confused.

AP

NH GOP

FOX News

they have all conspired to put bits of conflicting information without any clarity so that rumors can flourish.  This is a form of psyops to build pressure for someone to release a statement.  It is childish mind games.  But since the AP ran a story saying there was a bona fide event and RP knew he was not invited to it, he responsibly acted on behalf of his supporters (as he damn well better!).  Now we see the objective of their childhood games, to try and take a shot at his credibility.

So now the NH GOP/FOX News is meting behind closed doors to decide the next action based on a cost/benefit analysis:

Scenario 1] put on the forum without RP...helps to marginalize him in the primary the next day (benefit to CFR candidates) but could cause blowback (cost to the CFR controlled presidential election appointment)

Scenario 2] say that the forum never existed and that RP is a nutty old guy (benefit to CFR) but could cause blowback because there is so much evidence against this (cost to CFR credibility and Rothschild who controls AP)
__________________________________

So we need the bases covered either way and this is how we do it...

Find all of the articles with information about this 1/6 forum that has been in the news for the past 3 week.

Keep the pressure on NH GOP and FOX News until we get a complete statement on what they are doing.

I thought they were doing Scenario 2, but looks like they are going with scenario 1.  Dump that Nazi Stock!!!!!!!!!!!!

[industria]

Reposted to repair my botched URLs  


Summary so far... (Thank you billybigrigger. Now stop lurking, and post already.  )

Yahoo posts this: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071227/ap_po/on_the2008_trail_7 on Thursday evening.

Union Leader posts this: http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Giuliani%2C+Romney+to+join+Jan.+5+presidential+debate&articleId=141a7c52-a168-4f70-9497-8230e7309e9e  But this only hints at the Jan 6th event, and confuses things a bit by also mentioning another forum occuring on the 6th at a brunch event.

The ap makes this http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iNxTApa2sQRu0Xx99P3jt2bEXw7gD8TQ2N282  report regarding the forum event, the attendees, and quotes from NH GOP on Thursday as well.  (Which came first? Yahoo or AP?).

A couple of blogs pick it up (lost the links), Chris Brunner at Lewrockwell.com picks up on the story.

Jane Aitken from dailypaul.com OPPOSES any action, posts a cease and desist blog article, and urges FULL STOP until she said she could confirm with NH GOP and RP HQ.

Chris retracted the story on LRC after conversing with Jane via email. (Which ended up being unnecessary, her claims were based on an invite she said she had but did not actually exist -Brunner)

Jane and others (Chris Brunner LRC editor, and posters here claiming to be incontact with HQ) then get official word that RP has not been invited to such an event. Apparently according to those same people, RP HQ has been in contact with NH GOP and they report that NH GOP is working to get RP included, hence all the "OFFICIAL: DO NOT CALL NH GOP" threads and blog posts regarding this.

RP HQ releases this: http://www.ronpaul2008.com/press-releases/94/has-fox-news-excluded-ron-paul

dailypaul, LRC, and others put out the story.

Epic Thread ensues. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=67218&highlight=%2Fberserk

Chris Brunner and others apparently close to the campaign post on ronpaulforums (see http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=67477 first sticky and other older threads) regarding the situation and Chris puts out his account of events HERE: http://www.chrisbrunner.com/2007/12/29/it-is-true-ron-paul-is-being-excluded-from-the-fox-news-debate.

Boston.com publishes RP quote: http://www.boston.com/news/local/politics/primarysource/2007/12/paul_fox_news_i.html

The Seattle PI picks up on the AP report: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/345194_gop28.html

Baltimore Sun picks up the whole story to this point: http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/ron_paul_outfoxed.html

 A nolanchart blog seems to (wrongly) refute the current story (based on an outdated UL article that was incorrect in the first place -Brunner).  http://www.nolanchart.com/article797.html  But the blog is considered unreliable and the source of information outdated by 3 WEEKS!

WND Posts this http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59442 article, seemingly based on the same info as the nolanchart blog

This post by Jane Aitken seems to further confirm the RP exclusion story indirectly.... http://www.dailypaul.com/node/18338



 Fox 'forum' on 06 Jan mentions:

1) The Associated Press (Dec 27th wire)
AP article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071227/ap_po/on_the2008_trail_7

2) NH Union Leader (Dec 27th, quoting Giuliani campaign)
NH Union Leader: http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Giuliani%2C+Romney+to+join+Jan.+5+presidential+debate&articleId=141a7c52-a168-4f70-9497-8230e7309e9e

3) Baltimore Sun (Dec 29th, quoting NH GOP official)
Baltimore Sun: http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/ron_paul_outfoxed.html

3) NH GOP (via telephone)
4) Fox News (via telephone)
Fergus Cullen (via telephone, AP, and Union Leader quotes)
Journalist and Supporter telephone calls to NH GOP and FOX

5) RP campaign
RonPaul2008 Press Release: December 28, 2007 10:39 pm EST (see reply #52 above)

[industria]

FOX News Station Confirms it on Live TV!!!!!!

Ron Paul Fox Covers Fox Censorship New Hampshire Forum Jan 6

2 min - Dec 31, 2007 -  (30 ratings)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCAYRWIcPKQ

Story by Fox affiliate station KPTM in Omaha, NE. covering exclusion of Ron Paul from the Fox and New Hampshire GOP sponsored Repuplican Candidates Forum to be held on Jan. 6th in New Hampshire, and the onlaught of Ron Paul supporters expressing discontent for this blatant act of cencorship.

And at the very end of this video they admit that Fred is polling lower than Ron Paul yet Fred is invited!

SCUM SUCKING BASTARDS! 

[industria]

Thanks to yongrel on Ron Paul Forums for this tip. 

Most of us don't have fax machines and the like, but we can still run their machines out of paper.

Free Online Faxes
http://faxzero.com/


202-824-6470
312-494-0445
310-571-2009
202-824-6426

# Brit Hume, Managing Editor Fax: 202-824-6426

# Justin Schmidt, Chicago Bureau Chief : Phone: 312-494-0428; Fax: 312-494-0445

# Ken LaCorte, Los Angeles Bureau Chief Fax: 310-571-2009

# Kim Schiller Hume, Wash DC Bureau Chief Fax:202-824-6426

[industria]

What are they smoking at the Daily Paul?  What's next? A round of Kumbaya as they pass the love beads?


http://www.dailypaul.com/node/18324

Fox News' Ron Paul Exclusion Blessing in Disguise "Thank You Fox, We Love You!"
Posted December 29th, 2007 by Sygnus Centauri

This is the greatest thing that could have possibly happened! When I read the official statement from Ron Paul campaign HQ, I was completely flabbergasted and my first instinct was to get patriotically pissed off. But then, remembering what this campaign is really about - "Love in Action," I put on my counter-instinctual thinking cap and realized, this is exactly what we needed.

Fox news and Rupert Murdoch are old and out of touch with the new paradigm shift occurring in this country as well as around the world. New media is taking over, largely by the internet, where people aren't just told the news, they participate and help sort out what exactly the news is without all the slick manipulative subliminal b.s. that you get from major network news media.

Fox news and other old media think like reptiles and can't conceive the effects of their actions over the long term. You know, maybe David Icke is right about some things. Regardless, it is very telling that Fox news has chosen to exclude Ron Paul from their so-called "debate."

This is going to be the biggest news story of 2007! If you are pissed off that they excluded Ron Paul, well, you should be, BUT you should be thanking Fox News for this opportunity for a real showdown. This is going to cause a huge amount of people to wake up to the reality that we have known about all along, that the old media has been manipulating us for decades and it's high time that it stop right now.

Now, there are some great ideas circulating around about how we should handle this; boycott, stock dump, thank you letters, etc. and we would do well to consider them with intelligent foresight as to how they will affect things over the long term. The one thing we must not do, is complain too vehemently about this, or go out and do something drastic or rash - Fox is expecting that, they may be shortsighted, but they aren't stupid, this could be a setup. Don't be the one who goes out and fights against them tooth and nail, they'll just get more ammunition to call us loonies. Right now, it is they who have given us ammunition to use against them, but instead of using against them let's just convert it to more enthusiasm, the power of love is infinite and beyond measure, and that, my friends, is what this campaign is really all about!

Their debate is a farce anyway, and it likely wouldn't bring a whole lot of new supporters; however, their exclusion will bring thousands upon thousands to Ron Paul's doorstep. WE THE PEOPLE should be thanking Fox for being so shortsighted, this truly is a Blessing in Disguise, now let's run with it and laugh and have fun all the way to a Ron Paul Presidency in 2008. Thank you Fox news!

Kill 'em with kindness! They hate that most of all! Love is their kryptonite! If you feel inclined to respond to Fox via email, be sure to thank them and DO NOT complain. They are doing us a big favor and don't even know it. Hell, why even let them in on the secret, at this point, we don't want Ron Paul at their "debate." There's plenty of more constructive things we could be doing than wasting precious time and energy fighting against something that in the long run is doing us a huge amount of good.

R.I.P. Fox News
(1996-2008)

[Dig]

What are they smoking at the Daily Paul?  What's next? A round of Kumbaya as they pass the love beads?


http://www.dailypaul.com/node/18324

Fox News' Ron Paul Exclusion Blessing in Disguise "Thank You Fox, We Love You!"
Posted December 29th, 2007 by Sygnus Centauri

This is the greatest thing that could have possibly happened! When I read the official statement from Ron Paul campaign HQ, I was completely flabbergasted and my first instinct was to get patriotically pissed off. But then, remembering what this campaign is really about - "Love in Action," I put on my counter-instinctual thinking cap and realized, this is exactly what we needed.

Fox news and Rupert Murdoch are old and out of touch with the new paradigm shift occurring in this country as well as around the world. New media is taking over, largely by the internet, where people aren't just told the news, they participate and help sort out what exactly the news is without all the slick manipulative subliminal b.s. that you get from major network news media.

Fox news and other old media think like reptiles and can't conceive the effects of their actions over the long term. You know, maybe David Icke is right about some things. Regardless, it is very telling that Fox news has chosen to exclude Ron Paul from their so-called "debate."

This is going to be the biggest news story of 2007! If you are pissed off that they excluded Ron Paul, well, you should be, BUT you should be thanking Fox News for this opportunity for a real showdown. This is going to cause a huge amount of people to wake up to the reality that we have known about all along, that the old media has been manipulating us for decades and it's high time that it stop right now.

Now, there are some great ideas circulating around about how we should handle this; boycott, stock dump, thank you letters, etc. and we would do well to consider them with intelligent foresight as to how they will affect things over the long term. The one thing we must not do, is complain too vehemently about this, or go out and do something drastic or rash - Fox is expecting that, they may be shortsighted, but they aren't stupid, this could be a setup. Don't be the one who goes out and fights against them tooth and nail, they'll just get more ammunition to call us loonies. Right now, it is they who have given us ammunition to use against them, but instead of using against them let's just convert it to more enthusiasm, the power of love is infinite and beyond measure, and that, my friends, is what this campaign is really all about!

Their debate is a farce anyway, and it likely wouldn't bring a whole lot of new supporters; however, their exclusion will bring thousands upon thousands to Ron Paul's doorstep. WE THE PEOPLE should be thanking Fox for being so shortsighted, this truly is a Blessing in Disguise, now let's run with it and laugh and have fun all the way to a Ron Paul Presidency in 2008. Thank you Fox news!

Kill 'em with kindness! They hate that most of all! Love is their kryptonite! If you feel inclined to respond to Fox via email, be sure to thank them and DO NOT complain. They are doing us a big favor and don't even know it. Hell, why even let them in on the secret, at this point, we don't want Ron Paul at their "debate." There's plenty of more constructive things we could be doing than wasting precious time and energy fighting against something that in the long run is doing us a huge amount of good.

R.I.P. Fox News
(1996-2008)

I will absolutely follow this "feel good" advice as I vehemently pursue executives at FOX being indicted for treason.  Until the last minute up to the Brunch, email, call, dump stock, demand an answer.

We have been pushed aside for 30 years.

Had enough?

I mean they are being obvious about it.  They are openly admiting that they are dumping 99% of the American People in favor of a hand ful of ewlites.  This is the most blatant form of open election fraud I have ever herd of. 

[Dig]

Ron Paul is good enough for Sweeden, but not for FOX...

Ron Paul on Swedish Television 28/12

2 min - Dec 29, 2007 -  (161 ratings)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FmB1Insi08

[independentWV]

We know Bush and Clinton in bed with one another. Republicans and Democrats in bed with one another. They cannot overlook true straw poll results and Ron Paul is the greatest threat. News Corp supports Hitilary. Looking above Michael Steele it is easy to see who made the call. Neocons are trying hard to put Hitilary in the White House.

[independentWV]

Need to demand Senate Ethic Commission stand up and take notice of Judicial Watch List. Let's stick it back to Hitilary and other Neocons.

[Sasha]

From Hotties for Ron Paul
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=192349536&MyToken=ed7c563d-db5e-4437-8572-2f7999d9191e

The threatened boycott of FOX sponsors by RP supporters, has caused a huge roar of investors talking of a mass dump of NWS (FOX) stock. The stock's value has steadily declined...

http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.25639/browse_thread/thread/435d9e08edd073d4

[Dig]

SHORT NWS! Investors dumping FOX News stock because of RON PAUL ...SHORT NWS! Investors dumping FOX News stock because of Ron Paul censorship! http://www.dailypaul.com/node/18258 Talk of Huge sell-off of NWS stock on.
http://www.hotstockmarket.com/forums/politics-religion/57009-short-nws-investors-dumping-fox-news-stock-because-ron-paul-censorship.html - 53k - Cached - Similar pages

Investors dump stocks after Fed's modest rate cut - Yahoo! NewsInvestors dump stocks after Fed's modest rate cut .... Top Stocks 08' FOX Business Now - 2 hours, 27 minutes ago; Housing Slump Defines 2007 ABC News - Fri ...
www.news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071211/bs_nm/markets_stocks_dc - 48k - Cached - Similar pages

Dump Fox News and their Sponsors Stock Day - Ron Paul ForumsDump Fox News and their Sponsors Stock Day Fox News Debate/Forum. ... are one of the lucky investors selected by the investment bank bringing it to market, ...
www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?p=759347 - 10 hours ago - Similar pages

Investors threaten to dump NewsCorp stock in Response ...Investors are threatening to dump NewsCorp stocks and donate the proceeds to Ron Paul's campaign in response to Fox News barring Ron Paul from the New ...
www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?p=741796 - 67k - Cached - Similar pages

Liberty Line (In The Sand): Will There Be a Run on NewsCorp (NWS ...Instead, irate investors from around the nation and around the world began announcing their plans to dump NWS stock in several internet forums, ...
www.libertyline.blogspot.com/2007/12/will-there-be-run-on-newscorp-nws.html - 126k - Cached - Similar pages

[Dig]

More stories that try to diffuse the obvious crimes: http://www.nolanchart.com/article817.html

There is a crime, we are being raped and violated ot this very moment.  Those that are whispering in our ears saying that we should just accept the rape are fairly unaware of what is really going on or they are accomplices. 

Dump, Call, Write.

Remember what happened within 24 hours of our last outrage.  First thing that needs to be done is 300 million people need to know that this is actually going on.  Those that are still saying there is no conspiracy can hardly deny that it indeed is a conspiracy.  Here is a story that lays out some of the facts:

Fox News Excludes Ron Paul from Presidential Debate After All
 http://www.gambling911.com/Ron-Paul-123007.html
 
Fox news eliminating debate participation of only anti-war Presidential candidate:  Ron Paul
 
Breaking News:
 
Fox News has excluded Ron Paul from participating in the last debate the weekend before the primary election begins.  The debated occurs on January 6, less than one day after two back to back Republican and Democratic debates are being held at the same location sponsored by ABC News, WMUR-TV and Facebook.
 
Ron Paul supporters will be holding rallies, writing letters to the editor, boycotting all sponsors, calling Fox news and in an additional move there is even talk of contacting all shareholders of the company that owns Fox news (I will let you look that up yourself) and is advising everyone to sell sell sell and for those of you not able to sell, buy short.  I am not offering any advice, I am only reporting what I have seen in print. 
 
Ron Paul himself, a man who rarely gets upset over all of these decisions to oust him from events, stated "They are scared of me and don't want my message to get out, but it will,"  he continued "They are propagandists for this war and I challenge them on the notion that they are conservative."
 
As I have been saying for months, the mainstream media is not to be trusted and this is further proof of it.  This is a Presidential election for goodness sake, not an election for scout master.  Fox News is  heavy handedly affecting the outcome of the election of the President of the Free World.  The simple act of excluding Ron Paul will have a huge impact on the election.  New Hampshire, although it has lost half of its delegates due to holding their primaries too soon, is still the first primary in the nation (Iowa holds the first caucus) and thus has a huge effect on who people will determine is an electable candidate. 
 
I have never subscribed to the "who is most popular" method of picking a candidate, I prefer to choose based on substance, but there are many who still believe that it is wasting a vote to vote for the man you want to win if you think he could lose and instead choose a lesser candidate with more of a chance.  Nonsense.  All you get by voting for the lesser of two evils is evil.   You do not get a prize for voting for the man who turned out to be the winner.  If you want the war to end, then Ron Paul is the only Republican who is willing to take that stance and the only man who voted against the war in the first place.  One of the reasons our economy is falling so rapidly along with the dollar is because of our government's war spending.
 
Those of you that are fine with Fox news choosing who are viable candidates, sit back and enjoy the propaganda.  If there are any folks left with a little gumption, Ron Paul's staff is planning a rally that will take place at the same time as the 90 minute (ummm, debate?) will air on television.  The Fox "debate" will be taped at Saint Anselm College in Goffstown, NH.   It is hard to call it a debate when they have limited participation to only candidates who agree about the war and nearly every other neo-con un-conservative position.  They cannot even claim that they are doing this by who is doing better in the polls because Ron Paul is polling higher than some of those invited.  Fox is blatantly attempting to affect the outcome of this political election.  (Is that legal under FCC rules?)     
 
Of course Fox news if free to eliminate any candidate they want.  They are (or should be) a free market enterprise and Ron Paul would whole-heartedly agree. However, that does not mean that the market won't respond.  How that market will respond, well, I guess we will have to wait and see. 

For me, I hope the market response is to tell Fox that their brand of propaganda (dishonestly described as news) isn't selling.

[Dig]

Ron Paul's Fox News Fiasco: The Spin Starts Here.
This past day has been a fiasco. Let's look step back and take a look at it.
http://www.nolanchart.com/article801.html
by John Armstrong

"...Of Course if it Turns out that he is excluded,

It's time to Raise Some Hell...."

[Dig]

http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NWS

Look at the drop in after hours trading on Friday to Monday.

Looks like Murdoch is having to pump in money to keep it affloat!

We can bankrupt him by continuing to dump his treasonous stock!

Started off being dumped, then a Murdoch infusion, and now being dumped again. hahaha

F U Murdoch!

[independentWV]

Upward trend in morning is not unusual watch afternoon after all sells are calculated stock is starting to trend downward now.

[Dig]

Check out the Google discussions, traders are going apeshit:
http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.25639/topics

     Lack of credibility is the issue!   
News Corporation has a monopoly over much of the news and media and claims to be fair, unbiased, and up to date. However the decision by FoxNews to exclude a viable presidential candidate because of differing viewpoints undermines the credibility of FoxNews and its parent News Corporation. I hope that the consequences are firstly that... more »
dvz - Dec 30, 10:24 pm - 2 new of 2 messages     News Corporation

   Drop it all right away.   
Fox News and NewsCorp as a whole are making a terrible mockery of the democratic system and are a disgrace to our Republic. Americans should not stand for this any longer. There is no logical reason to ban Ron Paul from any debate, especially considering his recent fund raising and polling numbers. If Duncan Hunter can still maintain his position... more »
mailpate...@gmail.com - Dec 29, 10:40 pm - 5 new of 5 messages     News Corporation

   I am dumping my shares of NWS Monday morning. I will not contribute to electioneering!   
A television news channel discriminating against a viable presidential candidate because they don't personally agree with his message or does not conform to their standards is rank electioneering and I will not have my hard-earned dollars used for that purpose. Excluding Ron Paul from the Jan. 6th Fox Forum was a HUGE insult to the thousands of... more »
lawrencejdan...@gmail.com - Dec 29, 9:24 pm - 1 new of 1 message     News Corporation

   This boycott thing is starting to look massive. Here are some possible shorts.   
One wonders how far it will go. I can't see TOY getting bit very hard, or PG, but some of the smaller advertisers are likely to take a serious hit. Here's a list that has been circulating: * Crest Whitestrips & Dawn (both Proctor & Gamble) 513-983-1100 * Delphi (Driving Products) 1.888.809.9800... more »
Tony Kimball - Dec 29, 7:54 pm - 3 new of 3 messages     News Corporation

   Warning: Boycott of FOX advertisers   
Due to Fox News' exclusion of Ron Paul from their upcoming New Hampshire forum, Dr. Paul's supporters will be contacting all of Fox's advertisers and demanding that they withdrawal their ad buys on Fox stations or face boycotts. Angering customers is not good for anyone's business.
danieljsm...@gmail.com - Dec 29, 4:34 am - 22 new of 22 messages     News Corporation

   i hope it chars   
this is what you get for destroying journalism! or at least, go to down to $1.00 a share. that would be awesome! i could buy the whole company. sweet!
candygirltasteri...@yahoo.com - Aug 4, 10:48 pm - 7 new of 7 messages     News Corporation

[lazarus]

careful everyone; there is a delay in both widespread coverage of this event and an apparent back and forth conflicting information in what little coverage there is. i think others have suggested that this might be an attempt to frustrate an RP supporter into doing something rash...or for them to stage a false flag event. i agree


remember the delay in media coverage after the second money bomb...then there was lots of coverage all of a sudden, but with the trickery of questions on white supremacy contributions, etc. THIS IS CHARACTERSITIC OF THE MSM. THEY NEED TO COORDINATE THEIR REPORTS FOR MAXIMUM EFFECT. THAT IS PROBABLY WHAT IS GOING ON NOW IN THE DELAY. THEY HAVE A PLAN. EFFECTIVE DISINFORMATION CANNOT BE SPONTANEOUS.

be on guard

l

[Dig]

careful everyone; there is a delay in both widespread coverage of this event and an apparent back and forth conflicting information in what little coverage there is. i think others have suggested that this might be an attempt to frustrate an RP supporter into doing something rash...or for them to stage a false flag event. i agree


remember the delay in media coverage after the second money bomb...then there was lots of coverage all of a sudden, but with the trickery of questions on white supremacy contributions, etc. THIS IS CHARACTERSITIC OF THE MSM. THEY NEED TO COORDINATE THEIR REPORTS FOR MAXIMUM EFFECT. THAT IS PROBABLY WHAT IS GOING ON NOW IN THE DELAY. THEY HAVE A PLAN. EFFECTIVE DISINFORMATION CANNOT BE SPONTANEOUS.

be on guard

l

Any false flag violent attack would come from David Rockefeller directly.  He runs full command and control on these type of activities.  No one is allowed to instigate a media hyped false flag attack without the expressed consent of David Rockefeller.  In addition, he would need to tell Rothschild before it was done.

Since there has not been one single soul on the face of the earth advocating violence in the name of RP (who was not a Rockefeller paid provocateur), and since Rockefeller has personally created the greatest genocides in world history, it is pretty clear whom the guilty party will be.  The grand Jury indictments all over the country will be extraordinary.  He will end up fleeing to some other country after his conviction like polanski.

With all that said, Rockefeller is so psychopathic that he may do something, so yes be on guard at all times and be vigilent in exposing any nonsense around Rockefeller/Rothschild/Neocon exposer #1.

[Stan]

   i hope it chars   
this is what you get for destroying journalism! or at least, go to down to $1.00 a share. that would be awesome! i could buy the whole company. sweet!
candygirltasteri...@yahoo.com - Aug 4, 10:48 pm - 7 new of 7 messages     News Corporation

[lazarus]

Any false flag violent attack would come from David Rockefeller directly.  He runs full command and control on these type of activities.  No one is allowed to instigate a media hyped false flag attack without the expressed consent of David Rockefeller. 

wow. rockyfeller himself? i hope he is reading this. I have something to whisper in your ear rockyfoofoo...

FREEDOM!

l

[dicktater]

But, Fred has been invited to the Fox News presidential candidate forum on Jan. 6. And,Ron Paul has still not been invited.

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/december2007/311207_outfoxed.htm

Fred has nothing left to stand on except Sean Hannity’s pin head, as he has done a great job of shooting himself in the foot repeatedly:

“I’m not particularly interested in running for president.”
– Fred Thompson, Burlington, Iowa, December 29, 2007

People who question his commitment should note that he’s dropped lucrative television and radio contracts and no longer accepts paid speaking tours.

http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/12/30/news/iowa/31b24975ed2c263e862573c100054e2b.txt

[Dig]

All of the Murdoch buybacks have been squashed!

Stock is down!!!!!!!!!!!!!

21.28 -0.01 (0.05%)

[Dig]

In the past year, the high for News Corp was 25.78

Today's price of 21.28 represents a market cap of $64.34 Billion

Today's price from the high of the year represents a net loss in market cap of $13.55 Billion.  If you add inflation it is like $17 Billion from its yearly high.

I think Murdoch owns 52%

So that means a net loss of around $8.5 Billion

No wonder why he had to sell those 8 stations for $1.1 Billion (net $500 Million cash to him).  Is he going to become the next Trump?

[Dig]