Bill Gates is scared to death that everyone knows his vaccines kill millions

Author Topic: Bill Gates is scared to death that everyone knows his vaccines kill millions  (Read 62173 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
WTF, look at him begging for people to shut up about the truth just like Al Gore yelling about global warming.

These fraudsters are 100% totally exposed as New World Order depopulation propagandists.

http://gizmodo.com/5752880/bill-gates-says-its-an-absolute-lie-to-link-vaccines-and-autism

Hey Bill, your flying vaccine eugenics insanity is a bona fide crime against humanity.

How is that seed bank going?

And how come you want to track every human on the planet?

And what about the foundations' building looking like the illuminati symbol?

What did Bill Gates II do for a living?

So many questions, but you ain't gonna answer them.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Davos: Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates announced a new direction Friday as he pledged $306 million in grants to develop farming in poor countries, leading the charge for corporate responsibility at a major meeting of business chiefs.

Could this why Bill Gates got involved, along with Monsanto, with the Norwegian Doomsday Seed Vault? Will Monsanto and the other GM Corporations be involved in this new project?

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/01/25/davos.main/index.html
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t

by F. William Engdahl

This news article is too long to post here.

Link: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529

I'm glad this topic has been brought up as I found myself coming to a similar conclusion when I was writing the below post about the dangers of nanotechnology and science as a whole (see below link)

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=17828.0

During writing that post a sudden realisation dawned on me that mankind may have already accidentally started his own demise by rushing forward scientific developments with instigating proper safeguards.  If this is true then it is a safe bet that certain individual are already in the know about this and if so then it is likely steps would be taken to avert such an ecological disaster.  Who would be turned to in the event of such impending doom but government whom may very well decide to use this crisis for their own advantage.

Cue the 'Doomsday Seed Vault' which is an unusually elaborate and very costly development being built inside a mountain on the remote Spitsbergen Island.  The seed bank will have dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter thick. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world which will be specially wrapped to exclude moisture. There will be no full-time staff, but the vault's relative inaccessibility will facilitate monitoring any possible human activity.

According to the Norwegian government the reason for this massive project is to ensure that 'crop diversity can be conserved for the future’ but the question has to be asked why figures such as Bill Gates, Rockerfeller and the GMO industries are all so eager in backing this?  Also why such a remote location and why such almost impenetrable security systems?  In my own oppinion there are only three real possibilities:    

(1) Gates, Rockerfeller and the GMO giants are really interested in the conservation of crop diversity.  ::)  
(2) They know that a massive ecological disaster is about to happen or is happenning    
(3) All of the figures have an ulterior motive behind this development  

Skipping to (2) for obvious reasons, what kind of ecological disaster could cause damage to crops and seeds?  One issue that immediately sprang to mind is the mysterious disappearance of honey bees across the globe.  In the past seven years alone many US honey bee colonies have vanished and now across Europe and the rest of the world the same trend is continuing.  The fact that experts are at a loss to explain the phenomenon is just part of the mystery but the more serious concern is that such a massive depopulation of bees would likely have a huge impact on the plantlife which is reliant on insects for pollination and the animal kingdom as a whole.  If this trend continues birds, crops and livestock could die off if there are no pollinating insects left.  If they die then so do we and it seems that Albert Einstein long forgotten prediction 'that if bees were to disappear, man would follow only a few years later' may be about to happen.

Finally, as Alex has covered in his film 'EndGame' there is a real possible that such a crisis has been instigated or will be in the near future for the purpose of population control and consolidation of power.  What better way for the elite to rebuild the planet in their desired image by starving off most of its' inhabitants and at the same time making a tidy profit by having a big vault literally bursting with millions of of seeds needed for crop production.  In the build up to such an event democracy would go straight out the window and a move towards a virtual police state would be used to test and condition the inhabitants for the approaching martial law that would to follow.  The fact that we are seeing this is enough to make me gravely worried :o    

"Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic
Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529
One thing Microsoft founder Bill Gates can’t be accused of is sloth. He was already programming at 14, founded Microsoft at age 20 while still a student at Harvard. By 1995 he had been listed by Forbes as the world’s richest man from being the largest shareholder in his Microsoft, a company which his relentless drive built into a de facto monopoly in software systems for personal computers.

In 2006 when most people in such a situation might think of retiring to a quiet Pacific island, Bill Gates decided to devote his energies to his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest ‘transparent’ private foundation as it says, with a whopping $34.6 billion endowment and a legal necessity to spend $1.5 billion a year on charitable projects around the world to maintain its tax free charitable status. A gift from friend and business associate, mega-investor Warren Buffett in 2006, of some $30 billion worth of shares in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway put the Gates’ foundation into the league where it spends almost the amount of the entire annual budget of the United Nations’ World Health Organization.

So when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to invest some $30 million of their hard earned money in a project, it is worth looking at.

No project is more interesting at the moment than a curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a barren piece of rock claimed by Norway and ceded in 1925 by international treaty (see map).


All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2003/may/03050902.html

yea, i guess Bill Gates was given the silver spoon.  Sure, he is smart, but not any smarter than i was as a kid writing assembly programming at age 11, but he had that little something extra to propell him to super-wealth status.

That's because his family is part of the elite.  Mine isn't, and I'm plugging away every day spending all my paychecks to my mortgage and other bills.
 
shit.

Download video's like these, they won't be around for ever:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1088218376303066663
"They may have grown up in dirt floor shacks, but they had a comic book paid for, by people like Bill Gates! I HATE YOU BILL GATES, I HATE YOU!"
I've done quite a bit of research on this POS, which I'll share in this topic.

Let's start with who he is. The media like to tell us that this was an ordinary boy whose parents where teachers (that's what I read as a kid) who was a college drop out who made it by himself, to give us the idea that the American dream still makes sense. In reality this boy came from an elite American family, just like Bush. His family consists of bankers. His maternal grandfather is James Willard Maxwell, who had a million dollar trust fund, because his father had founded Seattle's National City Bank. http://philip.greenspun.com/bg/
It's not such a big risk to quit college and found your own company when you have million dollar trust fund to fall back on is it?
His father is William H. Gates, Sr. This man was a wealthy corporate lawyer and on the board of directors of, believe it or not, Planned Parenthood, the organisation dedicated to ridding the world of the "human weeds", as Margaret Sanger liked to call them. http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_gates.html
As you can see, Bill Gates has grown up in a circle of eugenicists and other elitists.

Let's look at his charity now, because we've always been told that Bill Gates made a lot of money because he was such a talented young man who liked to work with computers and decided to use is to help the poor people. Well, as Alex explains in the video, these foundations are in essence just tax shelters. What does Bill Gates use his foundation for? Among other things, buying up shares in oil companies and pharmaceutical companies, like Merck, the company you may remember because it has given us Polio Vaccines "contaminated" with cancer causing viruses: http://www.aliveandwell.org/html/the_bigger_picture/Bill_Gates_Philanthropist_or_Polluter.html
With stocks in these companies the foundations that don't pay taxes (so you and me can't compete with them) can vote on corporate policies.
And, like Alex mentioned, he likes to buy up independent newspapers, thus controlling the media, without us able to compete because unlike Bill Gates we have to pay taxes:
http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2006/08/22/bill-gates-lends-cash-to-buy-newspapers
But, how about his real charitable activities, like saving the poor children? Well, read what he has to say himself:
http://www.rockefeller.edu/pubinfo/news_notes/121500a.htmlYou may remember the Rockefeller foundation for funding Hitler's eugenicist scientists like Mengele:
He also praised the Rockefeller family's century of philanthropy, saying, "It seems like every new corner we turn, the Rockefellers are already there. And in some cases, they have been there for a long, long time."
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/11/09/ING9C2QSKB1.DTL
Or perhaps you may know them for funding the Chinese government owned factories that produce the drugs used in China's eugenic one child policy, in which people which dyslexia are prohibited from having children: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A53938-2000Oct11
These are the kind of people Mr. Gates apparently looks up to. And he tries to follow their example, by funding the same organization his father once worked for(http://www.worldmag.com/articles/12056), and the Rockefellers helped create(http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/tay/tay_04robthecrad.html).
Because of this the Gates' are now so respected they get to rub shoulder with other self made men *cough* like David Rockefeller and Ted Turner (who wants to reduce the worlds population to 200-300 million people, has five children and also approves of China's one child policy) at special "philantrophic" events: http://www.carnegie.org/sub/awardees/album.html
Another big activity that the Gates Foundation is involved with is Gavi, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, more accurately described as the Global Association for rich white old men who want to keep poor women from having children by sterilizing them through vaccines. David Ayoub excellently covers this issue in this video from 56:40 onwards:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6890106663412840646


Next up, tearing down the myth that Bill Gates is feeding the poor:

I'm sure you've all heard this. Bill Gates is feeding starving kids in Africa (the ones who where born despite all his efforts). This is for example, how BBC puts it: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/somerset/4698309.stm
There are a few problems with this idea though. First of all, the fact that Bill Gates has stocks worth millions of dollars in a company called Pacific Ethanol:
http://www.greenbang.com/3357/bill-gates-sheds-biofuels-stake/
Biofuels are responsible for the global famines that are currently going on:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_christop_080410_the_great_biofuel_fa.htm
Another problem is that Bill Gates is funding the use of GMO technology to supposedly solve the famines in the 3rd world. In reality, GMO crops have been proven to cause lower yields:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/exposed-the-great-gm-crops-myth-812179.html
The difference is a yield of 10 percent. In India the GMO crops performed even worse:
http://www.greens.org/s-r/33/33-04.html  
But it gets worse. There is evidence that GMO crops could be a trojan horse, that will get worse each consecutive generation:
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/meltdown.php
Could it be that Bill Gates knows what he is doing with these GMO crops? Could it be that he knows this is currently already reducing yields across the planet adding to the famine caused primarily by biofuels? Could it be that he even knows there is a chance that this will go horrible wrong,  causing famines even worse than the ones we are currently seeing, because of a "genetic meltdown"? There is strong evidence Bill Gates knows that this could happen. A lot of you already know about this, thing called the doomsday vault, you're well informed, and it's been on the news. The doomsday vault is a vault in the arctic circle, where the seeds of non genetically modified plants are stored, in case a "disaster would happen" that would wipe them out. For some reason, only plant seeds are stored. There is apparently no need to store the genetic material of certain animals that are on the verge of going extinct, no, this is only for food crops, because apparantly there is a great chance a disaster will happen to these crops:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529
And you guessed it, this project is being funded by the Gates foundation and the Rockefeller foundation.

The problem is, Africa is not supposed to grow according to plans layed out by the British government. Follow this link, open Dimensions, military and click on risks:
http://www.dcdc-strategictrends.org.uk/viewdoc.aspx?doc=1
This is what it says:
Quote
Persistent African Instability.  Factors such as famine, environmental and demographic stress, endemic poverty, widespread HIV/AIDS and other diseases will endure in Africa, leading to a persistent risk of conflict in much of the Continent.  This will not only stifle regional economic growth, but may actually reverse such development.  The consequences, typically uncontrolled mass migration, transnational organized crime and increasing diaspora populations, may transmit risk beyond the region, particularly to Europe.  Significant containment of these consequences may be required, especially in the Mediterranean, if Europeans in particular are to remain ‘masters of the clock’.
Africa is supposed to stay poor forever, to allow multinational corporations to rape the continent and have non-governmental organizations like the UN and the African Union govern the continent. At best the continent will stay in it's current state according to the plans, but it may even slip back into complete chaos.
Russia and China will be destroyed as well.

They don't want Africa to grow, that's the whole point of their activities. Have you looked at what GAVI, which Bill Gates is a member of, is doing in the 3rd world? Population control through vaccines. In tests up to 20% of the vaccines they tested contained b-hcg, this means the young women will forever be incapable of having children. Population control is meant to prevent the 3rd world from growing in power. This is all because the Anglo-American elite want a unipolar New World Order, a unified world that is governed out of Europe, and perhaps to a lesser degree out of North America. Bill Gates would be risking his life if he tried to develop the continent of Africa, because they will never allow that to happen. Do you agree with me that the elite want to keep the 3rd world poor?

I don't understand why Bill Gates would be after more money. People like Bill Gates are after power, and money is just a means to an end. His friend Warren Buffet gave 36 billion dollar to the Bill Gates foundation, for example, and Bill Gates himself gave billions to the United Nations population fund. They're not greedy men. Believe me, if all we faced were a bunch of men who wanted to make more money, I would not be in this movement, I'd be spending my time doing something I enjoy. In fact, Bill Gates did not enjoy being the richest person in the world, because of the publicity he got from it: http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2006/05/04/bill-gates-wishes-he-wasnt-so-rich

These people prefer to be in the shadows, like the Rothschilds. Ofcourse Gates is nowhere near as powerful as these people, they allowed him into the club, the same way most of the billionaires where allowed in.

Eugenics does not necesarily involve killing. What we saw in Nazi Germany was a form ofeugenics that most of the eugenicists frowned upon. America was one of the first, if not the first nation where eugenics was exercised, and it did not involve killing people, it involved sterilizing women. Bill Gates and his father are eugenicists. They carry out population control programs on the poor, that makes them eugenicists. By the way overpopulation is no problem in Africa. Take a look at this map:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bc/Population_density.png

Then tell me why you would try to solve overpopulation in Africa. If there is any form of overpopulation (which I strongly doubt there is) it could be better solved by convincing the obese Americans to stop clogging their arteries with red meat.

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Bill Gates Wants to Read Your Mind

A computer capable of reading your mind may sound like science fiction, but it's rapidly becoming reality. Researchers at Microsoft  (Nasdaq: MSFT) are now using relatively inexpensive electroencephalography (EEG) caps to measure the brain's electrical activity, then applying sophisticated algorithms to decipher this data into something meaningful enough for a computer to use.

read entire article:

http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2007/08/30/bill-gates-wants-to-read-your-mind.aspx

Microsoft mind reading
http://www.newscientist.com/blog/invention/2007/10/microsoft-mind-reading.html
Not content with running your computer, Microsoft now wants to read your mind too.


The company says that it is hard to properly evaluate the way people interact with computers since questioning them at the time is distracting and asking questions later may not produce reliable answers. "Human beings are often poor reporters of their own actions," the company says. Instead, Microsoft wants to read the data straight from the user's brain as he or she works away. They plan to do this using electroencephalograms (EEGs) to record electrical signals within the brain. The trouble is that EEG data is filled with artefacts caused, for example, by blinking or involuntary actions, and this is hard to tease apart from the cognitive data that Microsoft would like to study. So the company has come up with a method for filtering EEG data in such a way that it separates useful cognitive information from the not-so-useful non-cognitive stuff. The company hopes that the data will better enable to them to design user interfaces that people find easy to use. Whether users will want Microsoft reading their brain waves is another matter altogether.
_______________________
FULL PATENT FROM THESE SICK F**KS
http://tinyurl.com/3ct98k
_______________________
United States Patent Application   20070185697
Kind Code    A1
Tan; Desney S. ;   et al.    August 9, 2007

Using electroencephalograph signals for task classification and activity recognition

Abstract

A method for classifying brain states in electroencephalograph (EEG) signals comprising building a classifier model and classifying brain states using the classifier model is described. Brain states are determined. Labeled EEG data is collected and divided into overlapping time windows. The time dimension is removed from each time window. Features are generated by computing the base features; combining the base features to form a larger feature set; pruning the large feature set; and further pruning the feature set for a particular machine learning technique. Brain states in unlabeled EEG data are classified using the classifier model by dividing the unlabeled EEG data into overlapping time windows and removing the time dimension from each time window. Features required by the classifier model are generated. Artifacts in the labeled and unlabeled EEG data comprise cognitive artifacts and non-cognitive artifacts. Inventors:   Tan; Desney S.; (Kirkland, WA) ; Lee; Johnny C.; (Pittsburgh, PA)
Correspondence Name and Address:        CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, JOHNSON, KINDNESS, PLLC
    1420 FIFTH AVENUE
    SUITE 2800
    SEATTLE
    WA
    98101-2347
    US
Assignee Name and Adress:   Microsoft Corporation
Redmond
WA

Serial No.:    349859
Series Code:    11
Filed:    February 7, 2006

U.S. Current Class:   703/11; 600/544
U.S. Class at Publication:   703/011; 600/544
Intern'l Class:    G06G 7/48 20060101 G06G007/48; A61B 5/04 20060101 A61B005/04

Claims


1. A method for classifying brain states comprising building a classifier model using labeled electroencephalograph (EEG) data signals that include artifacts and classifying brain states in unlabeled EEG data signals that include artifacts using the classifier model.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein building a classifier model comprises: a) determining brain states of interest; b) collecting a set of labeled EEG data signals that include artifacts ("labeled EEG data"); c) dividing the labeled EEG data into overlapping time windows; d) removing the time dimension from each time window; e) generating features from the time windows; and f) building the classifier model.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein generating features from the time windows comprises; a) computing the base features of the time windows; b) combining the base features to form a larger feature set; c) pruning the larger feature set without regard to machine learning techniques; and d) further pruning the feature set for a machine learning technique.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein classifying brain states using the classifier model comprises: a) collecting a set of unlabeled EEG data signals that include artifacts ("unlabeled EEG data");; b) dividing the unlabeled EEG data into overlapping time windows; c) removing the time dimension from each time window; d) generating features required by the classifier model from the time windows; e) using the classifier model to classify brain states in the unlabeled EEG data; f) choosing the size of the averaging kernels; and g) averaging the classifier output over adjacent time windows.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the artifacts included in the labeled EEG data signals includes cognitive artifacts.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the artifacts included in the labeled EEG data signals includes cognitive and non-cognitive artifacts.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the artifacts included in the unlabeled EEG data signals includes cognitive artifacts.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the artifacts included in the unlabeled EEG data signals includes cognitive and non-cognitive artifacts.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the EEG signals are collected from pairs of sensors attached to individuals.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the pairs of sensors comprise two pairs of sensors.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein individuals are neurologically healthy individuals.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the neurologically healthy individuals are users in tests to evaluate user interfaces.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the brain states are associated with at least one condition of users selected from the group of user conditions comprising: interruptability, cognitive workload, task engagement, communication mediation, interpreting and predicting system response, surprise, satisfaction, and frustration.

14. The method of claim 1, including discriminating at least two different brain states.

15. The method of claim 1, including determining the persistence of brain states.

16. The method of claim 1, including determining the transitions between brain states.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of features is generated and then pruned.
Description


BACKGROUND

[0001] When studying how humans interact with computing devices, it is desirable to be able to determine the effectiveness of a computer-user interface, i.e., a user interface. A traditional way of determining the effectiveness of a user interface is to present a computer user, i.e., a user, with a task, observe the user as he or she operates the user interface to complete the task, and ask the user questions before, during, and/or after the task is performed. The observed behavior and answers to the questions are characterized and quantified. The quantified results are analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the user interface.

[0002] Cognitive neuroscience techniques can be used to provide a more direct way to determine the effectiveness of user interfaces. A typical cognitive neuroscience technique involves attaching electrical sensors, ie., sensors, to various points on a user's scalp. The sensors are then connected to an electroencephalograph (EEG). One use of an EEG is to sense electrical changes within the brain that correspond to certain brain states. It is possible to determine the effectiveness of a user interface by analyzing a user's brain states before, during, and/or after a user performs a task using the user interface.

[0003] As the name implies "cognitive" neuroscience techniques, also called cognitive techniques, are focused on thought processes. Cognitive techniques analyze electrical signals caused by electrical changes within the brain, i.e., EEG signals. The EEG signals contain data and patterns of data associated with brain states, which can be used to infer the existence of thought processes. A problem with cognitive techniques is that EEG signals often contain artifacts, i.e., unwanted data, that may distort the brain state information. In the past, attempts have been made to overcome artifacts or "noise problems" by filtering EEG signals and by using neurofeedback. While effective at eliminating some artifacts, filtering and neurofeedback add significant cost and complexity to cognitive techniques which in turn reduces the utility of applying cognitive techniques to determine the effectiveness of user interfaces.

SUMMARY

[0004] This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.

[0005] A method for classifying brain states using EEG signals is disclosed. The method is capable of determining the persistence of brain states and the transitions between brain states. The method comprises building a classifier model using labeled EEG data and classifying brain states in unlabeled EEG data using the classifier model.

[0006] An exemplary classifier model is built by determining brain states; collecting a set of labeled EEG data; and dividing the set into overlapping time windows. The time dimension is removed from each time window, features of the data, i.e., features, are generated for the time windows, and the classifier model is built. Features are generated from the time windows of the labeled EEG data by computing the base features of the time windows; combining the base features to form a larger feature set; pruning the larger feature set without regard to machine learning techniques; and further pruning the feature set for a particular machine learning technique. Brain states are classified using the classifier model by collecting a set of unlabeled EEG data, dividing the unlabeled EEG data into overlapping time windows, and removing the time dimension from each time window. Features required by the classifier model are generated from the time windows. The classifier model is used to classify brain states in the unlabeled EEG data. The size of averaging kernels is chosen and the classifier output is averaged over adjacent time windows. The labeled and unlabeled EEG data contains both brain state data and artifacts.

[0007] In one exemplary application, the EEG signals are collected from sensors attached to the scalps of neurologically healthy individuals ("users") as the users operate user interfaces. Preferably, the number of sensors is substantially less than the number of sensors normally employed in EEG signal data collection--four (4) sensors forming two sensor pairs, for example. Preferably, the brain states are associated with at least one condition chosen from the group of user conditions comprising: interruptability, cognitive workload, task engagement, communication mediation, interpreting and predicting system response, surprise, satisfaction, and frustration.

[0008] Exemplary uses of the method include, but are not limited to: comparing the cognitive workload levels or workload types of a plurality of user interfaces; evaluating cognitive utility of user interfaces in real time to enable dynamically adapting user interfaces to users' states; and presenting an enhanced, detailed awareness of the cognitive workload of groups of users.


All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_British_Empire
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_honorary_British_Knights

Forget Masons, this is the biggest order of many of the richest and most powerful people in the world: The Order of the British Empire.

Bono
Guliani
Bill Gates
Billy Graham
Colon Powel
Hamid Karzai
Tommy Franks
Alan Greenspan
Benito Mussolini
George H. W. Bush

And on, and on, and on... This is the list I will be referring to everytime I hear someone say we need to kill-off 90% of the population.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Bill Gates’ Grand Vision

In a recent speech, Bill Gates announced that the first age of information technology was coming to a close, and the second age would soon be coming.

The first age, clearly, was to create our dependency on computers. Without them, we are unable to send e-mails and carry out tasks in our everyday lives, including those in our employment.

This ambition of IT dependency was first outlined when Bill Gates made what was seen as an outlandish goal… to have a personal computer in every home. People thought it was ridiculous. Why would people need computers? And the fact is: we didn’t need them, but since then our increasingly globalised lifestyles have adapted such that communication would be impossible without computers. Bill Gates has successfully altered our lifestyles such that we depend on computers.

Fast forward to 2008, and Bill Gates has announced another ambitious goal: to make every surface in our households a touch screen computer. And who’s to disagree with Mr. Gates? With over $50 billion in personal wealth, massive global influence and the status as the head man of Microsoft – one of the world’s largest companies – Bill Gates has power. When Bill Gates makes a speech outlining such a grand, broad vision as having every surface as a computer, he isn’t joking. This is what he wants to achieve.

While Bill Gates’ first goal took over 20 years, Microsoft has already taken many steps towards achieving its latest goal. The next Microsoft Operating System, Windows 7, is said to be based entirely around touch screen interfacing. Furthermore, Microsoft has already released a “Microsoft Surface”, a product which is a touch-screen table computer which can interact with all your portable digital devices, simply when they are placed on the table. Of course, cost is also a factor. Affording one computer is hard enough, so surely having one on every desk is unfeasible to say the least. Bill Gates has announced that the prices of the touch computer would be much lower than regular computers, as they would essentially be just screens connecting to a central computer; much like your laptop connects to your router to get internet access. Also, cloud computing is gaining popularity, i.e. storing files and programs online, and simply accessing them from low-cost PCs connected to the internet. Whichever the case, the unregulated market of PCs has consistently showed innovation, with enormous leaps in computing power and considerable decreases in prices.

So what is the purpose of all of this, apart from Microsoft’s incentive of making a ludicrous amount of money? To answer that question, we must first consider what reality is and how touch screens could influence our reality. Scientists have proven that atoms are almost entirely empty space, and since we are made up of atoms, how can we possibly exist in physical form? Well, what we perceive as physical reality is simply our way of interpreting electromagnetic wavelengths and frequencies, i.e. vibrations, and converting them into images. It’s much the same as a television converting signals into images on-screen.

We, as humans, vibrate to a certain frequency. All humans vibrate to essentially the same frequency – give or take a relatively irrelevant level of measurement. This is the same frequency that the Earth and the entire universe vibrate at. Thus, we ARE everything. This is where The Theory of One comes from, i.e. everything is one. We are all interconnected. The frequency of our vibration determines how we think, how we decode the electromagnetic waves talked about earlier. We only see trees as trees right now because we vibrate to a certain frequency.

These touch screen computers can influence the frequency at which we all vibrate. A touch screen works as follows. Electromagnetic frequencies are continually sent from one side of the screen to the other. When you press down on the screen, the frequencies are interrupted at a certain point and then measurements are made to determine which co-ordinate on the screen was touched. Thus, when you press down on a touch screen, you are physically touching an electromagnetic wave. You are connecting yourself to a computer circuit. Now, we’ve all used touch screens, and we haven’t been affected. But imagine if you constantly used a touch screen, on every surface in your house. What if you were surrounded by them? Every time you walked, you would interact with the fields. It would be a slow and steady alteration of your vibrational frequency. And the whole transition would be seamless. You wouldn’t actually notice anything, because you’re only ever considering the one frequency that you vibrate at, whatever that frequency is.

In addition to this, simply looking at screens can affect your frequencies. All existing televisions are set at a certain flicker rate. Television is scientifically proven to have a hypnotic, sleep-like, lulling affect, which is why people can get addicted to TV. It is the same reason that people get addicted to video games, also. It’s all the involvement of looking at a screen with certain frequency waves. It’s similar to being addicted to tobacco. When you smoke, your blood stream gets locked into tobacco and can only get away from it if you don’t smoke for a prolonged period of time. When you watch TV, you get locked into a sleep-like vibration and your body wants to enter that again. Your body likes the relaxation of sleep. Hypnosis always involves putting your body into a sleep vibration. Obviously, television cannot legally give you strong enough vibrations to keep you addicted like tobacco, otherwise there would be serious legal trouble.

HOWEVER… that doesn’t mean that TV couldn’t lull you if it wanted to. A simple increase in the intensity of the waves would do the trick.

You can leave it to your imagination to think of what the purpose of locking all of humanity into a certain vibrational frequency is, but remember: Bill Gates made his vision clear, and it certainly was not a joke.

So with stage 2 established by Bill Gates, is there a stage 3? Yes, stage 3 is a full transformation from human to machine. It is known by scientists as transhumanism, i.e. intergrating the human body with technology. Memory chips could be inserted into our brains. Our bodies could even be physically replaced with circuits and metals. This would overcome the obstacle of death and would rid the need for resource consumption. The Earth could be left to biologically thrive.

Of course, machines do require one power source, that being electricity. Stage 2 is going hand in hand with the current day global warming movement. The development of unlimited, free energy sources is gradually becoming the world’s primary focus, given post-$100 oil prices. Solar panels could forever power a new wave of cyborg humans, and thus the Earth’s geological climate could be left in perpetual balance with nature. Animals could be left naturally with one another and environmental destruction would end. There would be no more need for oil or emissions or pollution.

The potential of the sun’s energy would never run out. Every moving object would be powered by the sun. Computing algorithms and programs could also prevent the new human cyborgs from destroying each other with weapons. Technology would be forced upon a new age of humanity to ensure no chance of humanity’s progress from ever being erased in a shock event, such as a nuclear world war or environmental catastrophe.

And you know what? This actually sounds like a good idea. Imagine it: humanity could explore space freely. There would be no obstacle of having to consume oxygen. All we would ever need is energy from the sun. We would literally be human space rockets. We could live forever.

The thing you find scariest about this, I assume, is the concept of love being destroyed. You assume that you could never be attracted to a robot. Well, I should remind you that we are just electromagnetic vibrations. Scientists have been able to send waves to humans that make them horny, that make them sad, that make them happy. All your presumed emotions are simply the result of certain frequencies. Scientists could biologically make any person in the world attracted to you, and that person wouldn’t even know why. So, as a robot, you could potentially achieve pleasure whenever you pleased.

There are two major obstacles on the road to Bill Gates’ grand vision being achieved. One is the actual capability of humans to connect to machines and replace oxygen input with solar. Scientifically, we are… presumably… no where near such a utopia. The second obstacle is managing to simultaneously transition every one of the nearly 7 billion people of this world, into a human cyborg. Over half of the world currently lives on under $2 a day, with many countries lacking basic water access, let alone solar energy. In fact, no country in the world has an economy relying in the majority on solar.

And then, getting the world to comply with this huge transition would be impossible. People simply would not be willing to give up their flesh.

So, unfortunately, it appears that one of two things is going to happen.

Either (1) the world’s elite will decide that there are simply too many people and the transhumanist technology is way beyond our reach, and thus, the world’s population will be largely killed off, through starvation, wars, nuclear weapons and more.

Or (2) humanity will be placed into a virtual matrix (and then possibly killed off) through RFID chips. Various staged events will scare humanity into accepting ID chips as a form of identity proof and, thus, instead of TVs and touch screens, waves directly from the implanted chips will go to the brain and manipulate us into a new vibrational world. A company, Verichip Corp., has already begun production of “RFID for humans” and is rising on the stock market.

The future is ominous, but it appears that Bill Gates is going for the optimistic option of fully integrating humanity with technology. This may actually be possibly without a transhumanist stage 3. Perhaps the touch screen vibrations will be enough to control us sufficiently.

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Dark cloud over good works of Gates Foundation
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gatesx07jan07,0,4205044,full.story?coll=la-home-headlines
By Charles Piller, Edmund Sanders and Robyn Dixon
Times Staff Writers January 7, 2007

An ink spot certified that he had been immunized against polio and measles, thanks to a vaccination drive supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

But polio is not the only threat Justice faces. Almost since birth, he has had respiratory trouble. His neighbors call it "the cough." People blame fumes and soot spewing from flames that tower 300 feet into the air over a nearby oil plant. It is owned by the Italian petroleum giant Eni, whose investors include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Justice squirmed in his mother's arms. His face was beaded with sweat caused either by illness or by heat from the flames that illuminate Ebocha day and night. Ebocha means "city of lights." The makeshift clinic at a church where Justice Eta was vaccinated and the flares spewing over Ebocha represent a head-on conflict for the Gates Foundation. In a contradiction between its grants and its endowment holdings, a Times investigation has found, the foundation reaps vast financial gains every year from investments that contravene its good works.

In Ebocha, where Justice lives, Dr. Elekwachi Okey, a local physician, says hundreds of flares at oil plants in the Niger Delta have caused an epidemic of bronchitis in adults, and asthma and blurred vision in children. No definitive studies have documented the health effects, but many of the 250 toxic chemicals in the fumes and soot have long been linked to respiratory disease and cancer. "We're all smokers here," Okey said, "but not with cigarettes." The oil plants in the region surrounding Ebocha find it cheaper to burn nearly 1 billion cubic feet of gas each day and contribute to global warming than to sell it. They deny the flaring causes sickness. Under pressure from activists, however, Nigeria's high court set a deadline to end flaring by May 2007. The gases would be injected back underground, or trucked and piped out for sale. But authorities expect the flares to burn for years beyond the deadline. The Gates Foundation has poured $218 million into polio and measles immunization and research worldwide, including in the Niger Delta. At the same time that the foundation is funding inoculations to protect health, The Times found, it has invested $423 million in Eni, Royal Dutch Shell, Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and Total of France — the companies responsible for most of the flares blanketing the delta with pollution, beyond anything permitted in the United States or Europe. Indeed, local leaders blame oil development for fostering some of the very afflictions that the foundation combats. Oil workers, for example, and soldiers protecting them are a magnet for prostitution, contributing to a surge in HIV and teenage pregnancy, both targets in the Gates Foundation's efforts to ease the ills of society, especially among the poor. Oil bore holes fill with stagnant water, which is ideal for mosquitoes that spread malaria, one of the diseases the foundation is fighting. Investigators for Dr. Nonyenim Solomon Enyidah, health commissioner for Rivers State, where Ebocha is located, cite an oil spill clogging rivers as a cause of cholera, another scourge the foundation is battling. The rivers, Enyidah said, "became breeding grounds for all kinds of waterborne diseases." The bright, sooty gas flares — which contain toxic byproducts such as benzene, mercury and chromium — lower immunity, Enyidah said, and make children such as Justice Eta more susceptible to polio and measles — the diseases that the Gates Foundation has helped to inoculate him against.

Investing for profit

AT the end of 2005, the Gates Foundation endowment stood at $35 billion, making it the largest in the world. Then in June 2006, Warren E. Buffett, the world's second-richest man after Bill Gates, pledged to add about $31 billion in installments from his personal fortune. Not counting tens of billions of dollars more that Gates himself has promised, the total is higher than the gross domestic products of 70% of the world's nations. Like most philanthropies, the Gates Foundation gives away at least 5% of its worth every year, to avoid paying most taxes. In 2005, it granted nearly $1.4 billion. It awards grants mainly in support of global health initiatives, for efforts to improve public education in the United States, and for social welfare programs in the Pacific Northwest. It invests the other 95% of its worth. This endowment is managed by Bill Gates Investments, which handles Gates' personal fortune. Monica Harrington, a senior policy officer at the foundation, said the investment managers had one goal: returns "that will allow for the continued funding of foundation programs and grant making." Bill and Melinda Gates require the managers to keep a highly diversified portfolio, but make no specific directives. By comparing these investments with information from for-profit services that analyze corporate behavior for mutual funds, pension managers, government agencies and other foundations, The Times found that the Gates Foundation has holdings in many companies that have failed tests of social responsibility because of environmental lapses, employment discrimination, disregard for worker rights, or unethical practices. One of these investment rating services, Calvert Group Ltd., for example, endorses 52 of the largest 100 U.S. companies based on market capitalization, but flags the other 48 for transgressions against social responsibility. Microsoft Corp., which Bill Gates leads as board chairman, is rated highly for its overall business practices, despite its history of antitrust problems.

In addition, The Times found the Gates Foundation endowment had major holdings in:
•  Companies ranked among the worst U.S. and Canadian polluters, including ConocoPhillips, Dow Chemical Co. and Tyco International Ltd.
•  Many of the world's other major polluters, including companies that own an oil refinery and one that owns a paper mill, which a study shows sicken children while the foundation tries to save their parents from AIDS.
•  Pharmaceutical companies that price drugs beyond the reach of AIDS patients the foundation is trying to treat.

Using the most recent data available, a Times tally showed that hundreds of Gates Foundation investments — totaling at least $8.7 billion, or 41% of its assets, not including U.S. and foreign government securities — have been in companies that countered the foundation's charitable goals or socially concerned philosophy. This is "the dirty secret" of many large philanthropies, said Paul Hawken, an expert on socially beneficial investing who directs the Natural Capital Institute, an investment research group. "Foundations donate to groups trying to heal the future," Hawken said in an interview, "but with their investments, they steal from the future." Moreover, investing in destructive or unethical companies is not what is most harmful, said Hawken and other experts, including Douglas Bauer, senior vice president of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, a nonprofit group that assists foundations on policy and ethical issues. Worse, they said, is investing purely for profit, without attempting to improve a company's way of operating.

Such blind-eye investing, they noted, rewards bad behavior.
At the Gates Foundation, blind-eye investing has been enforced by a firewall it has erected between its grant-making side and its investing side. The goals of the former are not allowed to interfere with the investments of the latter. The foundation recently announced a plan to institutionalize that firewall by moving its assets into a separate organization, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust. Its two trustees will be Bill and Melinda Gates. The trust will invest to increase the endowment, while the foundation gives grants. "We've been operating under these principles for many years," said Harrington, the foundation policy officer. "But having an official separation makes it even more clear." With the exception of tobacco companies, asset managers do not avoid investments in firms whose activities conflict with the foundation's mission to do good. "Because we want to maintain a focus on the programmatic work," Harrington said in a written response to Times questions, "we have made it a policy to not comment on individual investment holdings."

Finally, the foundation does not invest any portion of its endowment in companies specifically because they advance its philanthropic mission. Much of the rest of philanthropy, however, is beginning to address contradictions between making grants to improve the world and making investments that harm it. According to recent surveys, many foundations, including some of the nation's largest, have adopted at least basic policies to invest in ways that support their missions. Major foundations that make social justice, corporate governance and environmental stewardship key considerations in their investment strategies include the Ford Foundation, worth $11.6 billion, the nation's second-largest private philanthropy; the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; the Rockefeller Foundation; and the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. Moreover, nearly one-third of foundations participate directly in shareholder initiatives, voting their proxies to influence corporate behavior. A few have become shareholder activists. In recent years, for instance, the Nathan Cummings Foundation, with an endowment of $481 million, has sponsored proxies to force corporations to address environmental sustainability and political transparency. Harrington said the Gates Foundation's investment managers vote proxies, but declined to give any specifics. The foundation would not make its chief investment manager, Michael Larson, available for an interview. In May, Harrington told the Chronicle of Philanthropy that the Gates Foundation did not get involved in proxy issues. At the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, on the other hand, Michael J. Smith, its chief investment officer, said voting proxies to improve corporate behavior had become a fiduciary necessity. "Companies that have good governance are generally well-managed," he said, "and have a good record of profitability." Even the relatively tiny Needmor Fund, with a $27-million endowment, screens its investments to bar companies with poor environmental records, antagonism to worker rights or tolerance for repressive governments.

Leadership, however, is open to the Gates Foundation. It has unique power to move the debate, said Bauer, of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors. If Gates adopted mission-related investing, Bauer said in an interview, the shift in the world of philanthropy would be "seismic."

Life in 'Cancer Valley'

AT a clinic in Isipingo, a suburb of the South African port city of Durban where the HIV infection rate is as high as 40%, Thembeka Dube, 20, was getting a checkup. Dube had volunteered for tests of a vaginal gel that researchers hope will be shown to protect against HIV. The tests are part of a study conducted by the New York-based Population Council, and funded by a $20-million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Dube's boyfriend won't use condoms. She hoped the tests would show she could use the microbicidal gel, called Carraguard, and stop worrying about AIDS. Research into prophylactics such as Carraguard can fight AIDS by empowering women, Bill Gates told the International AIDS Conference in Toronto in August. "Whether the woman is a faithful married mother of small children, or a sex worker trying to scrape out a living in a slum … " he said, "a woman should never need her partner's permission to save her own life."

Two days before Gates spoke, Kyrone Smith was born only a few kilometers from the Isipingo clinic. At the same time the Gates Foundation was trying to help Dube, it owned a stake in companies that appeared to be hurting Kyrone. At six weeks, his lungs began to fail. Kyrone struggled to cry, but he was so weak that no sound came out — just husky, labored breaths. His mother, Renee Smith, 26, rushed him to a hospital, where he was given oxygen. She feared it would be the first of many hospital visits. Smith knew from experience. "My son Teiago was in and out of hospital since the age of 3," she said. "He couldn't breathe nicely…. There are so many children in this area who have the same problems."

Two of the area's worst industrial polluters — a Mondi paper mill and a giant Sapref oil refinery — squat among the homes near Isipingo like sleepy grey dragons, exhaling chemical vapors day and night. The Sapref plant, which has had two dozen significant spills, flares, pipeline ruptures and explosions since 1998, and the Mondi plant together pump thousands of tons of putrid-smelling chemicals into the air annually, according to their own monitoring. In 2002, a study found that more than half of the children at a school in nearby Merebank suffered asthma — one of the highest rates in scientific literature. A second study, published last year, found serious respiratory problems throughout the region: More than half of children aged 2 to 5 had asthma, largely attributed to sulfur dioxide and other industrial pollutants. Much of it was produced by companies in which the Gates Foundation was invested. Asthma was not the only danger. Isipingo is in what environmental activists call "Cancer Valley." Emissions of benzene, dioxins and other carcinogens were "among the highest levels found in any comparable location the world," said Stuart Batterman at the University of Michigan, a coauthor of both studies.

The Gates Foundation is a major shareholder in the companies that own both of the polluting plants. As of September, the foundation held $295 million worth of stock in BP, a co-owner of Sapref. As of 2005, it held $35 million worth of stock in Royal Dutch Shell, Sapref's other owner. The foundation also held a $39-million investment in Anglo American, which owns the Mondi paper mill. The foundation has held large investments in all three companies since at least 2002. Since then, the worth of BP shares has shot up by about 83%, Royal Dutch Shell shares by 77% and Anglo American shares about 255%. Dividends have padded the foundation's assets by additional millions of dollars.

The foundation has gotten much more in financial gains from its investments in the polluters than it has given to the Durban microbicide study to fight AIDS. Sapref said it had cut sulfur dioxide emissions by two-thirds since 1997 and spent more than $64 million over 11 years on environmental initiatives. It said lead in its gasoline and sulfur in its diesel fuel were reduced a year ago. Plant officials said: "Sapref does not accept any responsibility for any health issues in South Durban." Mondi said that its Merebank paper mill had cut "chemical oxygen demand," a key pollutant, in 2005, and that it was cutting its sulfur dioxide emissions. But by the company's own estimate, the mill still releases about three times the combined amount of sulfur dioxide produced by Mondi plants in five other nations, and the other plants operate at nearly six times the capacity. Merebank uses a coal-fired power plant, while the others burn cleaner fuel.

Just as the Gates Foundation investments in Mondi, BP and Royal Dutch Shell have been very profitable, so too have its holdings in the top 100 polluters in the United States, as rated by the University of Massachusetts, and the top 50 polluters in Canada, as rated by the trade publication Corporate Knights, using methods based on those developed by the university. According to the foundation's 2005 figures, it held a $1.4-billion stake in 69 of those firms. They included blue chips, such as Chevron Corp. and Ford Motor Co., as well as lesser-known companies such as Lyondell Chemical Co. and Ameren Corp. At the same time, the foundation held a $2.9-billion stake in firms ranked by the investment rating services as among the worst environmental stewards, including Dominion Resources Inc. and El Paso Corp. Without double-counting companies flagged by both the University of Massachusetts and the rating services, the combination totals an investment of about $3.3 billion. The Gates Foundation did not respond to written questions about its investments in companies that were high polluters or those rated as poor environmental stewards.

Drugs out of reach

NEARLY every morning, a 56-year-old retired soldier named Felix makes a short trek from his house on the outskirts of Lagos, Nigeria, to a factory to purchase a 40-cent block of ice. Felix has a pressing, private reason to get the ice: He needs it to keep his medicine from melting. Two years ago, Felix's wife died from AIDS, and he learned he was HIV-positive. He told his six children, now 16 to 24 years old, but no one else. He was afraid of the stigma of HIV. He agreed to be interviewed only if he was identified by his first name alone. "I thought the world had come to an end for me," Felix said. "Everyone believes that once you have it, you're a living ghost." He took antiretroviral drugs and felt better. But his treatment was interrupted frequently because he could not afford the cost: $62 a month. His pension as a former staff sergeant was $115 a month, and the money came sporadically. Worse, his body soon stopped responding to the drugs. His kidneys began to fail, and his count of immune cells crucial to fight off infections plummeted. In May, Felix began taking Kaletra, a second-line AIDS drug — needed when the first round of treatments fail.

His health rebounded, but it came at a cost.
Gel capsules of Kaletra melt in Nigeria's sweltering climate, where temperatures often top 100 degrees. Felix kept his Kaletra in a small chest filled with ice. Each day, he had to go get more ice. And each day, he had to take Kaletra precisely at 10 a.m. and 10 p.m. These things made it difficult for him to work, even at odd jobs. A new version of Kaletra does not require refrigeration. But his physician, Dr. T.M. Balogun, who helps run the AIDS program at Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, told him not to get his hopes up. The hospital is helped by the Nigerian government, which gets money from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. The fund has been awarded $651 million by the Gates Foundation. Yet the hospital does not offer the new Kaletra. It is too expensive. In August, private pharmacists said they could sell it for $246 a month. But that was far out of Felix's reach. Kaletra is made by Abbott Laboratories. As of this September, the Gates Foundation held $169 million in Abbott stock. In 2005, the foundation held nearly $1.5 billion worth of stock in drug companies whose practices have been widely criticized as restricting the flow of key medicines to poor people in developing nations. On average, shares in those companies have increased in value about 54% since 2002. Investments in Abbott and other drug makers probably have gained the foundation hundreds of millions of dollars.

Drug makers say they need price protection for research and development. "Our global needs and global systems are in conflict," Miles White, Abbott's chief executive, wrote in the Financial Times last year. "This threatens to harm one goal, innovation, in the name of another, access to medicine." In 1994, however, the drug makers, with other research-intensive businesses, lobbied hard and successfully for the international Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, which made it harder to move from costly brand-name drugs to cheap generics. The agreement protected new-drug monopolies for 20 years or more. This meant no low-priced generic for Kaletra. The pact locked in Abbott as its sole supplier, and Abbott set prices for the world. Under pressure from activists, Abbott and other companies cut prices for key AIDS drugs in poorer nations. In Guatemala and Thailand, the new Kaletra costs $2,200 per patient per year, plus taxes and fees — a fraction of the more than $8,000 it costs in the United States. In poorer Nigeria, the official price was $500 a year. But this was still too costly for most patients, including Felix. The industry's approach "has the effect of making medicines available only to a narrow spectrum of a rich elite in a developing country," said Brook Baker, an intellectual property expert at Northeastern University.

He called it "pharmaceutical apartheid."
Drug companies say critics overlook billions of dollars' worth of drugs they donate to developing nations. Abbott says it has given AIDS drugs to 25,000 patients, along with millions of test kits, and has underwritten a major project to improve AIDS services in Tanzania. In emergencies, critics welcome donated drugs. The problem, they say, is that donations scare away generic suppliers. Donations, said Ellen 't Hoen, who directs a drug-access program for Doctors Without Borders, "remove the prospect of any stable supply."

And when the free drugs are gone, patients die.

Most medicines are reliably profitable. In the most recent quarter, Abbott posted a gross profit margin of 59% of sales, and recently paid its 331st consecutive quarterly dividend. A congressional analysis shows that during the first six months of 2006, the 10 largest drug companies earned $39.8 billion in profits. The Gates Foundation's top priority is stopping AIDS, Bill Gates told the International AIDS Conference in August. Since its inception, the foundation has donated more than $2 billion to fight the disease. The foundation did not respond to written questions about the problems of patients who cannot obtain needed AIDS drugs due to pharmaceutical company policies. Meanwhile, the foundation holds its grant recipients to a far higher standard than the drug companies on which it bets large portions of its endowment. Its grant form says it expects recipients "to exercise their intellectual property rights in a manner consistent with the stated goals of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to promote the … availability of inventions for public benefit in developing countries at reasonable cost." Some critics say the foundation's failure to use its own investments "to promote … public benefit in developing countries at reasonable cost" might trace back to the source of most of its money — Microsoft — which Bill Gates serves as chairman. Microsoft monopolies in computer operating systems and business software depend upon the same intellectual-property and trade-law approaches favored by drug companies. "The Gates Foundation is in a position to change the dynamic, to make sure that drugs get first to the places they are most needed," said Daniel Berman, deputy director in South Africa for Doctors Without Borders. "But it conflicts with the interests of Microsoft."

In response to written questions, Harrington, the Gates Foundation policy officer, said the foundation tried to guarantee that grantee discoveries made in partnership with for-profit companies trickled down to people in developing nations. "The foundation's goal is to help ensure that new scientific knowledge is broadly shared … and that lifesaving health advances are created and made available and affordable to those most in need," she said. "We also recognize that private industry needs adequate incentives to develop new drugs." The foundation's pharmaceutical company investments, Harrington said, "are completely separate from what's being done on the programmatic side to help spur the development and delivery of drugs/vaccines."

Foundation investments
A sampling of the Gates Foundation's largest investments*:


More than $1.5 billion
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.**
Canadian government

Between $1 billion and $1.5 billion
Fannie Mae
German government

Between $100 million and $1 billion
Abbott Laboratories
Archer Daniels Midland Co.
BP (formerly British Petroleum)
Canadian National Railway
Exxon Mobil Corp.
Freddie Mac
French government
Japanese government
Merck & Co.
Schering Plough Corp.
Tyco International Ltd.
Waste Management Inc.
*May include stocks, bonds and other securities
**Warren E. Buffett committed his first installment of Berkshire Hathaway stock in June 2006.

Ethics-based investing
Some foundation trustees shun ethical investments out of concern about inferior returns. But several studies conducted over the last decade by financial analysts have eased that worry. Despite some exceptions, many mutual funds, for instance, that consider the social and environmental impact of their investments compete well against standard funds. In the 12 months that ended in November, several funds that consider the impact of their investments upon social welfare — including the New Alternatives Fund, the Parnassus Fixed-Income Fund and the Catholic Equity Fund I — performed in the top ranks of standard mutual funds in the same categories, according to SRI World Group. Broad indexes of stocks selected because of their companies' social concerns also have tended to keep pace with standard indexes. The Domini 400 Social Index is modeled on the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, a widely used measure of market performance. While results from the two indexes tend to leapfrog each other over short periods, from 1990 through November the Domini index has outperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 6%. From its inception about 18 months ago through November, KLD Research & Analytics' Global Climate 100 Index — made up of companies selected for their efforts to reduce climate change — rose 22.03%. In the same period, by comparison, the MSCI World Index, which measures general corporate performance in the U.S. and 22 other major developed nations, rose 20.73%. "After controlling for investment style," said economists at Maastricht University in the Netherlands who studied U.S., U.K. and German mutual funds, "we find little evidence of significant differences in risk-adjusted returns between ethical and conventional funds.
---------------
The overall figures in this series may significantly understate the volume of Gates Foundation investments that tend to conflict with its charitable goals. The Gates Foundation did not provide details for about $4.3 billion of investments it characterizes as loans.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
onfront Bill about this:
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/UnitedStates/PacificNorthwest/Announcements/Announce-379.htm
And this:
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_gates.html
GATES: When I was growing up, my parents were almost involved in various volunteer things. My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with that. And so it's fascinating. At the dinner table my parents are very good at sharing the things that they were doing. And almost treating us like adults, talking about that.

And here is Gates talking about the medical advances that will be available only to the elite:

GATES: The two areas that are changing in this amazing way are information technology and medical technology. Those are the things that the world will be very different 20 years from now than it is today.

I'm so excited about those advances. And they actually feed off of each other. The medical world uses the information tools to do their work. And so when you have those advances you think will they be available to everyone. Will they not just be for the rich world or even just the rich people and the rich world? Will they be for the world at large?


And here they are openly bragging about reducing the population growth:
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/GlobalHealth/Announcements/Announce-070529.htm
PDA’s achievements to date include:

    * Working with the Thai government to establish a national HIV prevention program, leading to an 87% reduction in new HIV infections

    * Developing innovative commercial ventures such as “Cabbages and Condoms” restaurants and “Birds and Bees” resorts to fund community health and development projects

    * Introducing community-based family planning programs that have helped to reduce annual population growth in Thailand by more than two-thirds since the mid-1970s

To them reducing the population growth by more than two-thirds is an achievement. Why you might ask? Well, Thailand is mentioned in Henry Kissinger's NSSM 200 document as one of the countries where they want to reduce the population growth. NSSM 200 details how to reduce the 3rd worlds population, using for example abortion and propaganda through the television. Note how the Bill and Melinda Gates website talks about rural women being targeted. I wonder whether they're referring to the Hill Tribes in Thailand, whom we know are being targeted: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB0FOjzvjiA
Well, there you have it, that's why I don't like Bill Gates.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately


Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26611205

I use Msn email and occasionally read the news articles which are mainly Brittany Spears or other propaganda. Today I saw this article, which by far amazed me the most as to the lies and eugenics program. Read the article yourself. Totally proves to me that Bill Gates is a New World Order scumbag, although I already new this before.

THE GOOD NEWS: The thing that amazed me even more though is that under the comments section it seemed at least a third of the people were awakened to some degree, whether it be the dangers of Mercury, but the cointel-pro misinformation is there too saying "Mercurys not bad its just a little bit there's no studies" When there's literally thousands. But they know the dumbed down public won't read them. But alot of people were awake to the NWO, and this is why I am posting this. Whatever happens guys, don't ever give up the information war. We MUST win.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Am I not reading this right?

UN to buy surplus crops from small-scale farmers
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/24/unitednations.food

More than 350,000 small-scale farmers in Africa and Central America will soon begin selling produce to the UN in an initiative that could transform the way food aid is purchased. Announcing the five-year $76m (£41m) pilot project today, the UN's World Food Programme said it would buy surplus crops from low-income farmers in 21 countries to help boost fragile economies. The food will be used fo regional hunger emergencies and safety net schemes, such as school feeding projects. While the WFP currently buys about 80% of its stocks locally in the developing world, virtually all of it comes from traders and large-scale farmers who can supply significant quantities of staples such as maize, sorghum and beans. "The world's poor are reeling under the impact of high food and fuel prices, and buying food assistance from developing world farmers is the right solution at the right time," said Josette Sheeran, WFP executive director, who described the Purchase for Progress scheme as a "win-win". "We help our beneficiaries who have little or no food and we help local farmers who have little or no access to markets where they can sell their crops."

Charitable foundations established by Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, and Howard Buffett, son of billionaire investor Warren Buffett, are funding the project, which targets some of the world's poorest countries, including Sierra Leone, Malawi, Ethiopia and El Salvador. It is expected that 40,000 metric tons of food - enough to feed to 250,000 people for a year - will be purchased from small-scale farmers in the first twelve months.

The farmers who sign up will be required to form into local collectives, and to set up a bank account in the group's name. The usual UN requirements for the growers to provide surety bonds, transport and packaging materials will be relaxed or waived. By selling directly to the WFP rather than middlemen it is expected that the farmers will receive higher-than-normal prices. There are also plans to negotiate seasonal contracts with the smallholder collectives to give them additional security. The announcement was made at the UN general assembly, where world leaders are discussing the progress made towards achieving the millennium development goals, whose targets include halving the 1990 poverty and hunger levels by 2015. Speaking at the launch, Bill Gates said that the new initiative "represents a major step toward sustainable change that could eventually benefit millions of poor rural households in sub-Saharan Africa and other regions". The WFP, which bought $612m (£330m) of food supplies in the developing world last year to feed 86 million people, said that it will ensure that local markets are not distorted by only purchasing from farmers with surplus crops. In time, it is hoped that the farmers will also be connected to other local and regional markets.

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Eugenics at its best!!

PICTURES AND FULL ARTICLE HERE: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529

One thing Microsoft founder Bill Gates can’t be accused of is sloth. He was already programming at 14, founded Microsoft at age 20 while still a student at Harvard. By 1995 he had been listed by Forbes as the world’s richest man from being the largest shareholder in his Microsoft, a company which his relentless drive built into a de facto monopoly in software systems for personal computers.

In 2006 when most people in such a situation might think of retiring to a quiet Pacific island, Bill Gates decided to devote his energies to his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest ‘transparent’ private foundation as it says, with a whopping $34.6 billion endowment and a legal necessity to spend $1.5 billion a year on charitable projects around the world to maintain its tax free charitable status. A gift from friend and business associate, mega-investor Warren Buffett in 2006, of some $30 billion worth of shares in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway put the Gates’ foundation into the league where it spends almost the amount of the entire annual budget of the United Nations’ World Health Organization.

So when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to invest some $30 million of their hard earned money in a project, it is worth looking at.

No project is more interesting at the moment than a curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a barren piece of rock claimed by Norway and ceded in 1925 by international treaty

On this God-forsaken island Bill Gates is investing tens of his millions along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among others, in what is called the ‘doomsday seed bank.’ Officially the project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group.

The seed bank is being built inside a mountain on Spitsbergen Island near the small village of Longyearbyen. It’s almost ready for ‘business’ according to their releases. The bank will have dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter thick. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future,’ according to the Norwegian government. Seeds will be specially wrapped to exclude moisture. There will be no full-time staff, but the vault's relative inaccessibility will facilitate monitoring any possible human activity.

Did we miss something here? Their press release stated, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future.’ What future do the seed bank’s sponsors foresee, that would threaten the global availability of current seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed banks around the world?

Anytime Bill Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto and Syngenta get together on a common project, it’s worth digging a bit deeper behind the rocks on Spitsbergen. When we do we find some fascinating things.

The first notable point is who is sponsoring the doomsday seed vault. Here joining the Norwegians are, as noted, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; the US agribusiness giant DuPont/Pioneer Hi-Bred, one of the world’s largest owners of patented genetically-modified (GMO) plant seeds and related agrichemicals; Syngenta, the Swiss-based major GMO seed and agrichemicals company through its Syngenta Foundation; the Rockefeller Foundation, the private group who created the “gene revolution with over $100 million of seed money since the 1970’s; CGIAR, the global network created by the Rockefeller Foundation to promote its ideal of genetic purity through agriculture change.

READ THE REST HERE: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529

Below is the official website of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food in Norway.
Now, I haven't researched this issue closely but as far as financing the vault, I have not seen anything on Gates/Rockefeller/Monsanto/etc., but from one research facility it was said that the cost of $10 million for the building was financed by the norwegian state which also will cover part of the running cost while the Global Crop Diversity Trust (GCDT) will cover a substantial part of these costs.

People interested in this matter might want to read the english version of this official site. Maybe there will be some interesting information here and there between all the hype and big words.

Svalbard Global Seed Vault:
http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/lmd/campain/svalbard-global-seed-vault.html?id=462220

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
how did bill know to invest in WMI and BP right before the spill?

In a recent interview with ABC News, Microsoft's Bill Gates also linked the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico with "climate change".  Gates warned that if we don't make the necessary changes soon that we will suffer severe consequences....

"We'll have more crises like the oil spill and we'll have the supply disruption. We'll start to see more and more effects of the climate problem."

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/obama-to-use-bp-oil-spill-as-an-opportunity-to-push-his-economy-killing-climate-change-bill
http://climateprogress.org/2010/06/11/bill-gates-backs-grossly-misleading-ad-on-clean-energy-rd-american-energy-innovation-council/
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

ersatz

  • Guest
here's gates patting himself on the back about
 performing "miracles"with his "charity"...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZvpF6gaGH4


"I like to say that vaccines are miracles. They’re miracles because giving children
 a couple of drops or a shot in the arm can prevent some of the worst childhood
 diseases for a lifetime. And that, for me, is a miracle.” ~
Bill Gates

what a f'ing psychopath...he's in hard sell mode now.

bill the miracle worker...more like eugenocide gates.

yeah bigtime, b.t.t...the comments on gizmodo under the article
were so sickening to read.
f'ing oblivious,lemming idiots...the descrip of "herd immunity" is just fine with them.
dehumanizing terms and these aholes embrace it like a term of endearment.

it's just pure insanity.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Selective Hearing - Brian Deer & The GMC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id_AxZ3zHAc

Wakefield was investigating "chronic enterocolitis in children that may have been related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction".

He was investigating the possible connection of Autistic children with chronic enterocolitis who had displayed symptoms after recieving the MMR vaccine. He was not targeting vaccines in general and he was not "anti-vaccine". He did express a view that parents should use individual vaccines over the combined MMR vaccine until further research could be done.

The medical and scientific communities are using the MSM to tar and feather Wakefield. I am seeing mainstream TV and radio here in Australia use the lowest tactics to paint Wakefield as a criminal.

Dr Andrew Wakefield In His Own Words (full interview)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7NotxTg7jg



http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=197370.0

"Medical investigative Journalist" Brain Deer was hired by The Times group in September 2003 to "find something big on MMR"

Brain Deer

Brain Deer is the main media man attacking Dr Wakefield, via Times group, the main organ of the Elite (quickest way to rot your brain is to read The Times), and the man who instigated the GMC case, yet isn't even going to give evidence!

He built up some pseudo-credibility as a medical 'investigative' journalist ("the only journalist in Britain that polices the drug companies" !!, yet here he is helping the cover up for a drug company product causing absolute devastation) by taking apart drugs such as Bactrim, but this just brings to mind Dr Mendelsohn's rule: "You never hear about the dangers of a drug unless another drug to replace it is available."  He gave a hint as to his bent by claiming DPT never caused any cases of brain damage (!), even though the UK gov has paid out for 900 such cases and the USA National Vaccine Injury Compensation Programme has paid out millions for DPT damage.  Media people never attack vaccination unless they want to find another career. This was the last real media vaccine investigation, into DPT: [1984] Fresno Bee DPT report. He should read it.

Read more: http://www.whale.to/vaccines/deer_h.html
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines

I just found something terribly shocking. I was doing research on population reduction and found an actual patent on a "birth control vaccine" (that's what they call it, it just kills human embryo's) for the 3rd world that works by causing an abortion after a fertilized egg has embedded in the wall of the uterus. Here's the link to the patent:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5733553.html
Read the description:
Quote
Population is growing at a rapid pace in many economically developing countries and there is a continuing need of an alternate method for regulation of fertility.We proposed several years back a birth control vaccine which induces the formation of antibodies against the human pregnancy hormone, the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). These inventions are described in patents issued in India, U.S.A. and several other countries. (Ref. EP 204566, JP 62286928, CA 1239346, U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,312, CN 8603854). We describe now another invention which generates antibody response of a long duration against hCG after a single or a limited number of injections.

Quote
The cost of some of these is at present very high which will be restrictive to their large scale use in family planning programs of economically developing countries. Moreover these vaccines demand three injections for primary immunization followed by a fourth as booster. A major advantage of the present embodiment is the possibility of getting satisfactory and sustained antibody response with one primary injection and at most one booster. Another interesting feature is the low cost at which this vaccine can be prepared and made available for large scale use.
Pretty odd isn't it? Why would they develop a birth control method that needs 4 injections? Especially considering the fact that it works by causing the body to attack hCG. hCG only starts it's work when the fertilized egg has nestled, and levels can only be detected at about 11 days after conception:
http://www.americanpregnancy.org/duringpregnancy/hcglevels.html
That means the unborn child simply dies after a few weeks due to lack of hCG. That's not how western birth control works, which prevents ovulation from happening:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depo_provera
(Note how the first 5 letters spell out depop btw)
So how is this stuff being used:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/mar/04031101.html
UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents Scientist Finds
Scientist says things discovered in vaccines are "harmful, toxic"

KADUNA, Nigeria, March 11, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria's youth against polio may have been a front for sterilizing the nation. Dr. Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, took samples of the vaccine to labs in India for analysis.

Using WHO-recommended technologies like Gas Chromatography (GC) and Radio-Immuno assay, Dr. Kaita, upon analysis, found evidence of serious contamination. "Some of the things we discovered in the vaccines are harmful, toxic; some have direct effects on the human reproductive system," he said in an interview with Kaduna's Weekly Trust. "I and some other professional colleagues who are Indians who were in the Lab could not believe the discovery," he said.

A Nigerian government doctor tried to persuade Dr. Kaita that the contaminants would have no bearing on human reproduction. "…I was surprised when one of the federal government doctors was telling me something contrary to what I have learned, studied, taught and is the common knowledge of all pharmaceutical scientists -- that estrogen cannot induce an anti-fertility response in humans," he said. "I found that argument very disturbing and ridiculous."

When asked by the Trust why Dr. Kaita felt the drug manufacturers would have contaminated the Oral Polio Vaccine, he gave three reasons: "These manufacturers or promoters of these harmful things have a secret agenda which only further research can reveal. Secondly they have always taken us in the third world for granted, thinking we don't have the capacity, knowledge and equipment to conduct tests that would reveal such contaminants. And very unfortunately they also have people to defend their atrocities within our midst, and worst still some of these are supposed to be our own professionals who we rely on to protect our interests."

Dr. Kaita is demanding that "those who imported this fake drug in the name of Polio Vaccines…be prosecuted like any other criminal."

The campaign to rid Nigeria of polio is in its fourth year. Officials there claim that all contaminated vaccines have been exhausted and replaced by uncontaminated batches.

In a rhetorical conclusion to the interview, Dr. Kaita asked "What plans has the government put in place to help children who have been given these toxic and contaminated vaccines in case they start reacting to them?"

This is not the first time UNICEF has been embroiled in a controversy over sterilizing agents in vaccines. LifeSiteNews.com reported that in 1995, the Catholic Women's League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG, which when given in a vaccine permanently causes women to be unable to sustain a pregnancy. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.

See the related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2002/oct/021030a.html
As you can see in the article, nigeria isn't the only country where this has happened. More examples are mentioned in this article:
http://www.thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm
Note that these are all countries mentioned in Henry Kissinger's NSSM 200 as countries where it's most important for the psychopaths to reduce the population growth:
Quote
In order to assist the development of major countries and to maximize progress toward population stability, primary emphasis would be placed on the largest and fastest growing developing countries where the imbalance between growing numbers and development potential most seriously risks instability, unrest, and international tensions. These countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, The Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia, and Colombia.
Perhaps this helps explain why billionaires like Bill Gates and Rockefeller and their charities are so much into vaccinating people:
http://www.who.int/inf-pr-1999/en/pr99-75.html
(notice that it's to get rid of polio, the hormone which causes the women to become infertile was found in polio vaccines in Africa)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Alliance_for_Vaccines_and_Immunization
Who's involved in GAVI:
    * Governments and vaccine industry of industrialized countries
    * Governments and vaccine industry of developing countries
    * World Health Organization, WHO
    * United Nations Children's Fund, UNICEF
    * The World Bank Group
    * Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
    * Research institutes
    * Non-governmental organizations
    * Foundations
    * Technical health institutes
The usual suspects...
Ofcourse Rockefeller wants to join the fun as well:
http://www.oldthinkernews.com/Articles/oldthinker%20news/endgame_the_rabbit_hole.htm
Well that's all, it's a long read, but it's very important, and I hope it's understandable.




http://www.gardasil.com/
GARDASIL is the only vaccine that may help guard against diseases that are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) Types 6, 11, 16, and 18:
•   Cervical cancer
•   Cervical abnormalities that can sometimes lead to cervical cancer
•   Genital warts
HPV Types 16 and 18 cause 70% of cervical cancer cases, and HPV Types 6 and 11 cause 90% of genital warts cases.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT GARDASIL
GARDASIL may not fully protect everyone and does not prevent all types of cervical cancer, so it is important to continue regular cervical cancer screenings.
Anyone who is allergic to the ingredients of GARDASIL should not receive the vaccine.

GARDASIL is not for women who are pregnant.
GARDASIL will not treat cervical cancer and genital warts and will not protect against diseases caused by other HPV types.
GARDASIL is given as 3 injections over 6 months and can cause pain, swelling, itching, and redness at the injection site, fever, nausea, and dizziness.
Only a doctor or healthcare professional can decide if GARDASIL is right for you or your daughter. Ask about GARDASIL today.
______________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/who-should-receive-gardasil.html
GARDASIL AND YOU
GARDASIL is for girls and women ages 9 to 26. GARDASIL works when given before you have any contact with HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18.

If you've already been infected with HPV, you may still benefit from GARDASIL because it is unlikely that you have been infected with all 4 types of the virus covered by the vaccine. Your doctor or healthcare professional can help you understand more.

WHY SHOULD I GET MY DAUGHTER VACCINATED WITH GARDASIL NOW? CAN’T IT WAIT?
Like other vaccines your daughter has received, GARDASIL works to help prevent illness. GARDASIL works when given before there is any contact with HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18. That’s why it’s important that you talk to your daughter’s doctor or healthcare professional about getting GARDASIL now—not later. You’ll be helping to protect her future from cervical cancer and genital warts before she’s even old enough to worry about them.

GARDASIL IS PART OF YOUR DAUGHTER’S RECOMMENDED VACCINATION SCHEDULE.
Talk to your daughter's doctor or healthcare professional about getting her vaccinated with GARDASIL.
_____________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/cervical-cancer-vaccine.html
PROTECTION: 3 IS KEY
GARDASIL is given as 3 injections over 6 months.
•   First dose: At a date you and your doctor or healthcare professional choose
•   Second dose: 2 months after the first dose
•   Third dose: 6 months after the first dose

Getting all 3 doses will allow you or your daughter to get the full benefits of GARDASIL.
__________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/ask-your-doctor-about-hpv.html
QUESTIONS FOR YOUNG WOMEN AGES 18 TO 26
TO ASK ABOUT GARDASIL

1.   What are the benefits of vaccination with GARDASIL?
2.   Should I still get vaccinated if I’m already sexually active?
3.   What are the possible side effects of GARDASIL?


QUESTIONS FOR MOTHERS OF DAUGHTERS AGES 9 TO 17
TO ASK ABOUT GARDASIL

1.   Why should my daughter be vaccinated now?
2.   How is the vaccine given?
3.   What are the possible side effects of GARDASIL?
_________________________________

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR YOUNG WOMEN AGES 18 TO 26
Vaccination with GARDASIL does not take the place of Pap tests (cervical cancer screenings). You should keep following your doctor's or healthcare professional's advice on getting Pap tests.
Pap tests have been proven to help save lives. A Pap test looks for abnormal cells in the lining of the cervix before they have the chance to become precancerous or cervical cancer. The more severe the abnormality, the more likely it is that cervical cancer could develop in the future.
Having an abnormal Pap test isn't any reason to panic—it doesn't always mean that you are at risk for cancer or even have HPV. Your doctor or healthcare professional may repeat the Pap test or do other tests as needed.
Pap tests will still be an important part of taking control of your health—and taking care of yourself.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR MOTHERS OF GIRLS AGES 9 TO 17
Pap tests (cervical cancer screenings) have been proven to save lives. A Pap test looks for abnormal cells in the lining of the cervix before they have the chance to become precancerous or cervical cancer.
Your daughter's doctor or healthcare professional can tell you when her first Pap test should be.
In the meantime, you can start her good healthcare habits now. Take her for regular wellness visits. Understanding the importance of wellness visits now may help her maintain regular checkups as she gets older.
__________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/cervical-cancer.html
WHAT IS CERVICAL CANCER?
Cervical cancer is cancer of the cervix (the lower part of the uterus that connects to the vagina). Cervical cancer is caused by certain types of HPV. When a female becomes infected with certain types of HPV and the virus doesn’t go away on its own, abnormal cells can develop in the lining of the cervix. If not discovered early and treated, these abnormal cells can become cervical precancers and then cancer.

THERE'S GOOD NEWS
GARDASIL is the only vaccine that may help guard against diseases caused by HPV Types 16 and 18, which cause 70% of cervical cancer cases, and HPV Types 6 and 11, which cause 90% of genital warts cases.
____________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/genital-warts.html
WHAT ARE GENITAL WARTS?
Genital warts are usually flesh-colored growths. The types of HPV that cause genital warts are different from the types that can cause cervical cancer. About 2 out of 3 people who have sexual contact with a person who has genital warts will also get them. And even if the genital warts are treated, 25% of cases come back within 3 months if HPV is still present.

THERE'S GOOD NEWS
Being vaccinated with GARDASIL before coming into contact with a person who has HPV can help protect you against HPV Types 6 and 11—the types of HPV that cause most cases of genital warts.
____________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/risk-for-hpv.html
HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV)
HPV affects both women and men.
•   Anyone who has any kind of sexual activity involving genital contact with an infected person can get HPV—-intercourse isn't necessary.
•   Many people who may have HPV may not show any signs or symptoms, so they can pass the virus on without even knowing it.

HPV is easily transmitted. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 20 million people in the United States already had HPV in 2005.
According to the CDC, the only way you can totally protect yourself against HPV is to avoid any sexual activity that involves genital contact. HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 account for the majority of HPV-related clinical diseases.



†Number represents more than 30 genital HPV types, not just HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18.

THERE'S GOOD NEWS
Being vaccinated with GARDASIL before coming into contact with a person who has HPV may help protect you against HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18.
__________________________________

http://www.gardasil.com/questions-about-gardasil.html
1.   Q: What is HPV?
    A: HPV is a common virus. In 2005 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that 20 million people in the United States had this virus. There are many different types of HPV. Some cause no harm; others can cause diseases of the genital area. For most people, the virus goes away on its own. When the virus does not go away, it can develop into cervical cancer, precancerous lesions, or genital warts, depending on the HPV type.
Top of page

2.   Q: How do people get HPV?
    A: HPV affects both women and men.
•   Anyone who has any kind of sexual activity involving genital contact with an infected person can get HPV—intercourse isn’t necessary.
•   Many people who have HPV may not show any signs or symptoms, so they can pass the virus on without even knowing it.

    HPV is easily transmitted. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 20 million people in the United States already had HPV in 2005.
    HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 account for the majority of HPV-related clinical diseases.

3.   Q: What is cervical cancer?
    A: Cervical cancer is cancer of the cervix (the lower part of the uterus that connects to the vagina). Cervical cancer is caused by certain types of HPV. When a female becomes infected with certain types of HPV and the virus doesn’t go away on its own, abnormal cells can develop in the lining of the cervix. If not discovered early and treated, these abnormal cells can become cervical precancers and then cancer.

4.   Q: What are genital warts?
    A: Genital warts are flesh-colored growths that appear in or around the genital area. The types of HPV that cause genital warts are different from the types of that can cause cervical cancer.
    About 2 out of 3 people who have sexual contact with a person who has genital warts will get them. Even after treatment, there is a chance that the genital warts could come back if HPV is still present. In fact, 25% of cases come back within 3 months.

5.   Q: Why should I get my daughter vaccinated with GARDASIL now?
Can't it wait?
    A: Like other vaccines, GARDASIL works to help prevent illness. GARDASIL works when given before there is any contact with HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18. That’s why it’s important that you talk to your daughter's doctor or healthcare professional about getting her vaccinated with GARDASIL now—not later. You’ll be helping to protect her future from cervical cancer and genital warts even before she is old enough to worry about them.

6.   Q: If I'm vaccinated with GARDASIL, will I still need to get Pap tests?
    A: Yes. Vaccination with GARDASIL does not take the place of Pap tests (cervical cancer screenings). You should keep following your doctor’s or healthcare professional’s advice on getting Pap tests. Pap tests have been proven to help save lives. A Pap test looks for abnormal cells in the lining of the cervix before they have the chance to become precancerous or cervical cancer. The more severe the abnormality, the more likely it is that cervical cancer could develop in the future. Having an abnormal Pap test isn’t any reason to panic—it doesn’t always mean that you are at risk for cancer or even have HPV. Your doctor or healthcare professional may repeat the Pap test or do other tests as needed. Pap tests will still be an important part of taking control of your health—and taking care of yourself.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT GARDASIL
HPV Types 16 and 18 cause 70% of cervical cancer cases, and HPV Types 6 and 11 cause 90% of genital warts cases.
GARDASIL may not fully protect everyone and does not prevent all types of cervical cancer, so it is important to continue regular cervical cancer screenings.
Anyone who is allergic to the ingredients of GARDASIL should not receive the vaccine. GARDASIL is not for women who are pregnant.
GARDASIL will not treat cervical cancer and genital warts and will not protect against diseases caused by other HPV types.
GARDASIL is given as 3 injections over 6 months and can cause pain, swelling, itching, and redness at the injection site, fever, nausea, and dizziness.
Only a doctor or healthcare professional can decide if GARDASIL is right for you or your daughter.


Well, I'm convinced these women won't inject it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB0FOjzvjiA
More information from this brave man fighting against UN genocide in Thailand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dutK67AwSg
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Gardasil: The Mercky World of Anti-Cancer Vaccines
Monday, 14 May 2007, 1:40 pm
Opinion: Cathy van Miert
Gardasil - The Mercky World of Anti-Cancer Vaccines
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0705/S00287.htm
By Cathy van Miert

President Nixon declared the "war on cancer" in 1971 by passing the National Cancer Act. A bounty of US$100 million was provided for research in the hope that a cure could be found for what was then the second-leading cause of death in the United States. At this time it was believed that many viruses played a role in cancer causation, so the race was on to identify, and develop vaccines against, the offending pathogens.

What followed was more of a one-legged limp to a distant finish line with precious little of therapeutic benefit arising from this research despite immense strides in technology and billions of dollars spent.
In June 2006 however, Merck Pharmaceuticals finally hopped over the finish line with Gardasil - the "first anti-cancer vaccine".

So is Gardasil really the Holy Grail of cancer prevention - or is it just media hype?

Following US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, Gardasil received the biggest hard sell of any recently introduced new medicines. Merck staged a dual campaign of intense lobbying of congress to have the vaccine made mandatory for all 11- and 12-year old girls, in tandem with an equally intense media campaign.

While a "life-saving vaccine" would be logically expected to sell itself, the campaign suffered some serious setbacks. Far from being perceived as a miracle, some sections of the public are regarding the vaccine with scepticism and suspicion. A vociferous backlash has put many of these state mandates on hold, and those state governors who initially backed the mandates have justified fears for re-election.

It isn't all doom and gloom for Merck however; the vaccine is predicted to achieve blockbuster status of over $1 billion in sales by the end of 2007. The media campaign is reaping pretty good returns.

The Hard Sell

The "One Less" Gardasil TV commercial is a prime example of slick marketing and corporate spin. In an attempt to resonate with its intended recipients, Merck has effectively 'branded' Gardasil much like Coca Cola or MacDonalds.

Pretty girls with 'attitude' display the words "One Less" written on skateboards, running shoes and clothing, while performing cool but wholesome activities like skateboarding, basketball and playing drums. They look deadpan at the camera; repeatedly stating they would like to be the "one less" (death from cervical cancer) statistic. Then an attractive mom introduces a note of caution delivered in loving, dulcet tones that the vaccine has potential adverse effects (required by US advertising law).

The overall message is that Gardasil is "cool" and lifesaving, even when mum has a few concerns (a note of teen rebellion). Furthermore, it's the only vaccine available, so who could possibly say no?

Watching the commercial more carefully demonstrates just how clever Merck has been with this approach - "one less" negates the need to state actual numbers of lives they expect Gardasil to 'save'. And the words in the voice-over expose a subtle but important difference between the commercial's overall feel and the necessity of insuring themselves against future litigation or charges of fraudulent claims.

"Gardasil - the only vaccination that may protect you against 4 types of human papilloma that may cause 70% of cervical cancer".

The voice is inflected on the word 'only' while 'may' almost slips past unnoticed. Semantics surely? But the use of the word may rather than will provides this insurance nicely; Merck cannot categorically state that Gardasil prevents cervical cancer for the simple reason that it has not been proven to do so in properly conducted clinical trials. This omission has not deterred the US Centers for Disease Control from recommending that all women between ages 11 to 26 years should be vaccinated.

In New Zealand, Merck seem rather more brazen than their US counterparts in the claims being made for Gardasil. On their website - gardasil.co.nz - information is provided for both patients and health professionals. Both are informed that HPV causes all cervical cancer. It appears that our cervixes (or our litigation laws) are different to those of the rest of the world! The information provided for doctors makes even more bizarre claims; "Gardasil is 100% effective in protecting your patients from diseases caused by HPV 16, 18, 6 and 11" including cervical cancer!" Were Ministry of Health officials asleep when this one snuck under the radar?

What you should know about this vaccine

Rather than rely the emotive (but no less important) anti-vaccine arguments this writer would like to bring a little logical perspective to the debate by looking at the evidence for the vaccine's effectiveness.

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection is mild and self-limiting in the majority of cases; indeed many people have no symptoms at all. The virus is generally cleared from the system within a few weeks to months.

HPV is not a single virus entity - over 200 sub-types have been identified, 30 of which are known to infect the genital tract. HPV 6, 11, 42, 43 and 44 are classified as low-risk (for cancer), while 16, 18, 31, 33, 34, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, and 70 are considered to be the "high-risk" subtypes depending on the population studied. Viral particles of subtypes 6, 11, 16 and 18 are used in the Gardasil vaccine. Although HPV DNA has been found in ~ 80% of cervical squamous carcinoma, many researchers feel that HPV alone "is neither necessary nor sufficient" for the development of cervical carcinoma, and have found evidence that additional genetic predispositions must be present. A US study published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews in 2003 stated:

    "A genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma has long been recognized and is widely accepted. Genetic predisposition was found to be even a greater component in cervical cancer when the same method of analysis was used. Genetic heritability was found to account for 27% of the effect of underlying factors for tumor development. Heritability could affect many factors contributing to the development of cervical cancer, including susceptibility to HPV infection, ability to clear HPV infection, and time to development of disease."

And yet Merck state repeatedly on their promotional material that cervical cancer is not heritable.

Far from being the much-touted epidemic, the incidence of cervical cancer has been declining steadily for the last 50 years largely thanks to effective screening programmes. Mortality from cervical cancer has also decreased - between 1980 the rate dropped from 12 to 5 per 100,000 people per year; so while HPV infection is on the increase, the rate of cervical cancer is not.

Cervical cancer falls into two types; squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma - the former is associated with the human papilloma virus (HPV). Squamous carcinoma is more easily detected by Pap smear, and comprises about 70% of all cervical cancers. The remaining 30% adenomcarcinomas are not easily detected with current cervical screening because it develops further up the cervical canal in areas that are not accessed by the traditional Pap smear.

How much does "One Less" cost?

The current incidence (new cases per year) of cervical cancer in NZ is 14 per 100,000 women - and one in three will die from the disease.

The cost of the 3 vaccinations required is $450.00. Once the GP fees are included (around $50.00 per visit) the total cost is roughly $600.00.

GSK's rival cervical cancer vaccine was shown to have "efficacy [antibodies in the blood] for up to 4.5 years". If we assume Merck's vaccine to be slightly superior, and generously allow up to 5 years protection (and it is a big if) and then calculate the number of HPV 16 and 18 associated cancer incidence:

14 X 70% (HPV-associated cervical cancer) = 9.8 cases per 100,000

9.8 X 30% (non HPV 16, 18-associated cervical cancer = 2.94 per 100,000

9.8 - 2.94 = 6.9 per 100,000 women per year with an HPV16,18-associated cervical cancer

6.9 per 100,000 equates to a 1 in 14,492 chance per year of getting the type of cancer associated with the strains of HPV in the Gardasil vaccine. Put another way, 14,492 females would have to be vaccinated to prevent one case of cervical cancer:

14,492 X $600 = $1,739,040
5 years

To possibly prevent one case of cervical cancer

$1,739,040 X 3 = $5,217,120

To possibly prevent one death from cervical cancer

There will always be the argument that every life is priceless, but the price tag of over 5 million dollars to possibly prevent one death from cervical cancer makes the Herceptin (breast cancer drug) funding issue look like the contents of the tips jar at a kleptomaniacs' convention.

So what evidence is there that Gardasil prevents HPV, and by inference, cervical cancer? A Medline search with the limit "randomised clinical trial" and the key word "Gardasil" returns nothing.

Forgive my cynicism, but surely the peer-reviewed medical publishing world would fight over publication of studies proving an anti-cancer vaccine was "effective and safe" if they were written in green crayon on plastic bubble-wrap by a dyslexic 2-year old chimpanzee. This should be earth-shattering news after all. Don't the researchers want any glory? They are not usually such reticent beings.

Evidence-Based Medicine?

There have been a few published HPV vaccine trials however; a repeat search using the key words "HPV vaccine" instead of "Gardasil" yielded 4 results. Reading these studies was a Goldilocks-type experience. One was too small, one was irrelevant, and two used a different vaccine. So where was the evidence of testing in over 20,000 women in clinical trials?

The only evidence of these trials is the Merck data itself (remember these are the chaps who "forgot" to submit the data on the deadly cardiovascular effects of Vioxx to the FDA or New England Journal of Medicine).

The trial results have not been published in the peer-reviewed literature, but were submitted for the FDA approval requirement. This is very common, and it may surprise many to learn that the FDA does not require publication of the data either prior to, or following approval. This means that new drugs, vaccines and devices are not independently reviewed before coming to the market. How 'independent' these FDA officials are is a valid point; new rules announced in March 2007 will bar medical professionals from serving on their advisory committees if they receive less than US$50,000 from the company whose product is being evaluated (or a competitor)! $49,999.99 wouldn't influence anyone - would it? How much were they receiving under the old rules?

A summary of their data is available in an FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Assessment Committee (VRBPAC) background document. It combines the results of some (but not all) of the Merck trials of Gardasil. The document is a veritable morass of anomalies and contradictions.

1) In its promotional material Merck claims that women aged 16-23 years are at highest risk of HPV infection; presumably due to the high level of sexual activity in this demographic.

The largest phase III study was the FUTURE (Females United To Unilaterally Reduce Endo/ectocervical disease) II study. Described as "a randomised, worldwide, placebo controlled, double blind study" which enrolled 12,167 women aged 16-23 years of age. Women were excluded if they were deemed high-risk (more than 4 lifetime sexual partners or other conditions deemed by the investigator to possibly interfere with the trial).

So Merck apparently excluded exactly the "high-risk" demographic the vaccine was intended for!

What the conditions were that investigators deemed to be possible interfering factors were not described. This is scientifically unusual; exclusion criteria are generally listed.
Of over 12,000 women screened, only 540 (4.5%) were deemed "high risk".

Only 4.5% of women screened by Merck were "high-risk" - how did they tap into such a virginal or abstentious population?

2) The results of study 015 are decidedly self-contradictory. External growth lesions (EGL or warts) were measured and the offending HPV subtype identified:

Table 1: EGL caused by HPV 6/11/16/18

Endpoint Gardasil
(n = 6082) Placebo
(n = 6075)
HPV 6/11/16/18 EGL (cases) 1 70

Table 2: EGL caused by all HPV infection (including HPV 6/11/16/18)

Endpoint Gardasil
(n = 6082) Placebo
(n = 6075)
HPV any type EGL (cases) 96 177


Merck has claimed repeatedly that "strains 6 and 11 cause 90% of genital warts". If this were the case then why so many extra cases of "all" HPV once the HPV 6/11/16/18 are subtracted. Using the 90% figure, one would expect 7 extra HPV infections caused by other strains rather than the 107 reported in the placebo group, and there should have been only 7 rather than 96 in the Gardasil group. According to Merck's own results, strains 6 and 11 contribute less than 40% to all genital warts.

3) In study 013 when they compared "HPV 6/11/16/18 and CIN 1" (pre-cancerous cells) and all "HPV and CIN 1 or worse" and the same phenomenon occurred - only 32% of the EGLs were caused by HPV 6/11/16/18. In the placebo group it was reported that there were 39 cases of CIN related to the HPV strains in the vaccine and 107 related to strains not covered by the vaccine, putting the oft-claimed 70% figure under the spotlight again; it now looks more like 27%.

4) The prevalence of women who were positive to HPV infection (using PCR) at the start of the study was 568/9075 in the Gardasil group and 580/9075 in the placebo group.
This puts HPV prevalence of Merck's participants at just over 6%, and yet most prevalence studies put (PCR) HPV prevalence at 30%.

5) The placebo recipients received one of two preparations. This type of protocol is unheard of in 'placebo controlled' studies.

Of all "placebo" recipients, 3470 received a preparation containing aluminium and 594 received saline - only 17% received a true placebo.

Aluminium is not an inert substance when it is injected into the human body. It is added as an adjuvant to enhance the immune response to a viral vaccine that on its own produces only a weak (and ineffective) response.

Why use this atypical protocol? Because it skews the safety data considerably; it effectively ensures that the adverse effects between placebo and Gardasil recipients did not differ significantly so they could claim it was 'safe and well tolerated'. In only one table the saline recipients are listed separately but in all the others they were not. This is nothing but scientific sophistry.

6) In one of the studies, in the group that had asymptomatic HPV infection confirmed at the start of the study, Gardasil vaccine resulted in a 33% greater number of external genital lesions. How did Merck explain this result?

"Differences in baseline characteristics". The package insert has conveniently left this information out.

7) When Merck combined the efficacy analyses for studies 007, 013 and 015 they used a "composite endpoint" to compare the efficacy of the vaccine with placebo. Researchers often use this somewhat sneaky contrivance when they know their product will not achieve any significant benefit in any single endpoint such as the 'actual' numbers of cervical cancers in each group. CIN 2/3 does not always progress to carcinoma. Lumping them in together does not allow any meaningful comparison.

8) Merck lobbied congress hard to have the vaccine made mandatory for all girls aged 11-12 years. Their trials had such a short duration of follow-up that nobody knows how long the antibodies will hang around (GSK's vaccine was 4.5 years).

The antibodies will be long gone from the bloodstream when an 11-year old vaccinee becomes sexually active 7-8 years later. Repeated vaccines would be necessary to confer ongoing protection (if it works) throughout her lifetime of sexual activity of over 40 years.

The Merck study results are inconsistent and self-contradictory at the very least; what they might be at worst could be the basis of litigation. They should be seriously called into question and thoroughly examined by independent (if there are any) epidemiological peer-reviewers.

To be fair to Merck, it is very difficult to prove an intervention works (or not) in healthy individuals. Usually 200 or so people have actually contract a disease in each group for the data to have any statistical power. If cervical cancer only has an incidence of 14 in 100,000 women/year they would need to follow over 2 million women for 1 year, or 1 million women for two years- and so on. Far more convenient and profitable for Merck that we offer up our daughters as the guinea pigs whilst paying through the cervix for the privilege - it's called "Post-Marketing Surveillance (and Merck have a woeful track record on that too).

Summary
    * Gardasil is a vaccine that may protect against a virus that may cause some but certainly not the majority of cases of cervical cancer
    * Gardasil is a vaccine that may only confer protection for less than 5 years
    * Gardasil is a vaccine that will require the spending of over five million dollars to possibly prevent one death
    * Merck are laughing all the way to the bank

ENDS
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
David Rothscum exposed the Rockefeller link to the depopulation vaccines two years ago in the following thread. Here are various quotes from his thread:

Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=22188.0

More inventions invented to be used for population control:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4233968.html
Quote
Nevertheless, the general convenience and safety of intrauterine devices continues to give hope that the IUD may one day provide an ideal method for worldwide population control, since it has been found, statistically, that intrauterine devices can provide effective contraception in a 98-99% range of effectivity
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/3858586.html
Quote
At the present time, there is a great need for a quick, easy and effective mechanism for female sterilization. This need is abundantly clear in the United States and is perhaps even more pressing in other countries, particularly, poverty striken countries. Birth control and population reduction are easily and non-surgically accomplished by a wide variety of means dependent on continual cooperation by the people involved. Sterilization, however, has generally been a serious surgical operation requiring hospitalization and use of a surgical operating room. Obviously, therefore, the need is clear for a sterilization procedure which can be carried out for example, in the doctor's office.

They know...

http://www.medanthro.net/maq/v14/14no2.html
Quote
Sterilizing Vaccines or the Politics of the Womb: Retrospective Study of a Rumor in Cameroon
Pamela Feldman-Savelsberg, Flavien T. Ndonko, and Bergis Schmidt-Ehry

    In 1990 a rumor that public health workers were administering a vaccine to sterilize girls and women spread throughout Cameroon. Schoolgirls leapt from windows to escape the vaccination teams, and the vaccination campaign (part of the Year of Universal Child Immunization) was aborted. This article traces the origin and development of this rumor. Theories of rumor and ambiguous cultural response to new technologies shed some light on its genesis and spread, but explain neither its timing nor its content. For this task we need to examine the historical context of Cameroonian experience with colonial vaccination campaigns and the contemporary contexts of the turmoil of democratization movements and economic crisis, concurrent changes in contraceptive policy, and regional mistrust of the state and its "hegemonic project." Drawing on Bayart’s politique du ventre and White’s thoughts on gossip, we explore this rumor as diagnostic of local response to global and national projects. This response, expressed in this case through the idiom of threats to local reproductive capacity, reveals a feminine side to local-global relations, a politics of the womb. [rumor, immunization, public health, Cameroon, fertility]
http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2004/march/polio.htm
Quote
NIGERIA: Muslim suspicion of polio vaccine lingers on


The success of the global effort to eradicate polio may rest on the outcome of a week-long tour of India, South Africa and Indonesia by a Nigerian delegation which has been conducting tests on polio vaccines used for immunisation in Nigeria.

The team comprised health officials nominated by the government and Jama'atu Nasril Islam, an umbrella group of Muslim organisations in Nigeria, and key Muslim leaders.

The federal government is hoping this high-powered delegation will these polio vaccines the all clear. That would help to dispel widespread suspicion in the mainly Muslim north of Nigeria that the vaccines contain anti-fertility agents and the virus that causes AIDS.
Without internet, without tv and without an education these people know what westerners are still denying for themselves.They're more afraid of standing out in the crowd or being branded a luddite or conspiracy theorist so they go along and destroy their health and any future they could have had.

Anyone with an internet connection can look up how Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist who founded planned parenthood, and how Bill Gates his father worked for this same organisation and is now using his son's money to vaccinate 3rd world people together with the Rockefeller Foundation that's at the same time funding facilities used for China's one child policy.

The people living in the 3rd world know they have to run away when the UN comes to ruin their lives with their vaccines, funded by fake liberals who think they're helping the poor people when giving money to Unicef. Unfortunately for the elite these people aren't as slavish as the Westerners whose families have been destroyed by so called feminist organizations that used to call themselves neo-malthusian before WWII (I'm not making this up, unfortunately the source text is Dutch so I can't prove this to you).

They've lived under colonialism for hundreds of years and they know when a bunch of rich politicians say they want to be their friends and help them they're lying and are trying to gain control over them.  I hope we'll learn the same lesson before it's too late.

Update: This vaccine was DEVELOPED by the Rockefellers!!!!!
http://www.popline.org/docs/0782/044328.html
Quote
Certain questions arise about the hormone specificity and consequently the safety of the antifertility vaccines which either are in phase I clinical trials or are planned to be by the Population Council and the Indian Institute of Immunology. These 2 groups maintain that their carrier-coupled antigens are safe on the basis that a-oLH, B-hCG, B-oLH, and a-oLH/B-hCG are either species specific, or, if antibodies against hLH are elicited they would cause no side effects.
The Population Council was openly started by John D. Rockefeller the 3rd in 1952:
http://www.popcouncil.org/about/timeline.html
The Rockefellers don't care that this stuff causes birth defects: http://www.writersontheloose.com/writers/DMIsham/index.cfm?story=34153
All they want to do is reduce the worlds population. I hope this man is currently burning in hell.
It shouldn't come as a surprise that the Rockefeller family is involved with covert sterilization. The Rockefeller's have been involved with eugenics ever since the 1920's.
http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html
I'd definitely recommend you to read this whole article, but here are some of the most important excerpts concerning the Rockefellers:

Quote
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.

Quote
More than just providing the scientific roadmap, America funded Germany's eugenic institutions. By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 -- almost $4 million in 21st-Century money -- to hundreds of German researchers. In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 to the German Psychiatric Institute of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, later to become the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry. Among the leading psychiatrists at the German Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Rüdin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression.

Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute's eugenic complex of institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. Since 1915, it had operated out of a single room. Everything changed when Rockefeller money arrived in 1929. A grant of $317,000 allowed the Institute to construct a major building and take center stage in German race biology. The Institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years. Leading the Institute, once again, was Hitler's medical henchman Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin's organization became a prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and others.

Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans taken from old age homes, mental institutions and other custodial facilities were systematically gassed. Between 50,000 and 100,000 were eventually killed.

Leon Whitney, executive secretary of the American Eugenics Society declared of Nazism, "While we were pussy-footing around…the Germans were calling a spade a spade."

A special recipient of Rockefeller funding was the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Berlin. For decades, American eugenicists had craved twins to advance their research into heredity. The Institute was now prepared to undertake such research on an unprecedented level. On May 13, 1932, the Rockefeller Foundation in New York dispatched a radiogram to its Paris office: JUNE MEETING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS OVER THREE YEAR PERIOD TO KWG INSTITUTE ANTHROPOLOGY FOR RESEARCH ON TWINS AND EFFECTS ON LATER GENERATIONS OF SUBSTANCES TOXIC FOR GERM PLASM.

At the time of Rockefeller's endowment, Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer, a hero in American eugenics circles, functioned as a head of the Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics. Rockefeller funding of that Institute continued both directly and through other research conduits during Verschuer's early tenure. In 1935, Verschuer left the Institute to form a rival eugenics facility in Frankfurt that was much heralded in the American eugenic press. Research on twins in the Third Reich exploded, backed up by government decrees. Verschuer wrote in Der Erbarzt, a eugenic doctor's journal he edited, that Germany's war would yield a "total solution to the Jewish problem."

Verschuer had a long-time assistant. His name was Josef Mengele. On May 30, 1943, Mengele arrived at Auschwitz. Verschuer notified the German Research Society, "My assistant, Dr. Josef Mengele (M.D., Ph.D.) joined me in this branch of research. He is presently employed as Hauptsturmführer [captain] and camp physician in the Auschwitz concentration camp. Anthropological testing of the most diverse racial groups in this concentration camp is being carried out with permission of the SS Reichsführer [Himmler]."

Josef MengeleMengele began searching the boxcar arrivals for twins. When he found them, he performed beastly experiments, scrupulously wrote up the reports and sent the paperwork back to Verschuer's institute for evaluation. Often, cadavers, eyes and other body parts were also dispatched to Berlin's eugenic institutes.

Rockefeller executives never knew of Mengele. With few exceptions, the foundation had ceased all eugenic studies in Nazi-occupied Europe before the war erupted in 1939. But by that time the die had been cast. The talented men Rockefeller and Carnegie financed, the institutions they helped found, and the science it helped create took on a scientific momentum of their own.

This wasn't the only way the Rockefellers were involved with eugenics before World War II. It's also mainstream history that the Rockefellers have been involved with Planned Parenthood ever since eugenicist Margaret Sanger started it: http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/tay/tay_04robthecrad.html
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Did the experimental hepatitis B vaccine cause AIDS in the 1980s?
Submitted by The Editor on Μαρτίου 20, 2007 - 12:46.
NotAIDS! Investigative Report
March 20, 2007
http://notaids.com/el/hepb

On the subject of whether the experimental hepatitis B vaccine, grown on green monkey's kidneys and administered to thousands of gay men between 1979 and 1981, had any relationship to the so-called AIDS outbreak of the 1980s and early 1990s, precious little has been written. The following excerpt was published in Johns Hopkins University's American Journal of Epidemiology1 Vol. 130, No. 6: 1167-1175 (1989).

"Between 1978 and 1980, 359 hepatitis B seronegative homosexual and bisexual men were recruited from the San Francisco municipal sexually transmitted disease clinic for hepatitis B vaccine trials. Of the 359 participants, 320 (89%) consented to have their stored blood samples tested for human immunodeficiency virus antibodies. The prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in these 320 vaccine trial participants rose from 0.3% in 1978 to 50.9% in 1988. The annual incidence of human immunodeficiency virus infection showed that seroconversion peaked in 1980-1982, dropped significantly in 1983, and has remained low..."

This following excerpt was published in the CDC MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly). Note the error in the language: "...if (AIDS) virus were present, it would be killed by the manufacturing process."

"HB vaccine acceptance in the United States has been seriously hindered by the fear of possible AIDS transmission from the vaccine. The recent identification of AIDS' etiologic agent has made possible direct laboratory measurement of virus inactivation, nucleic acid presence, and serologic evidence of infection. These studies were unable to detect the AIDS virus' viral protein or nucleic acid in the purified vaccine product and clearly indicate that if virus were present, it would be killed by the manufacturing procedures. In addition, epidemiologic monitoring of AIDS cases and high-risk groups confirms the lack of AIDS transmission by HB vaccine. This information should remove a major impediment to vaccine use."

Since viruses are not living, viable, independent organisms, they cannot be killed. What is most interesting is how earnest the efforts were by the CDC to deflect attention away from the experimental vaccine, which was no longer in use for mainstream America when the MMWR letter was published.

Yet, a significant cohort of 700,000 gay men were already infected with an active, viral agent that was the experimental formulation of the hepatitis B 'vaccine,' grown on green monkey kidneys. They needed and desperately wanted the world to believe these men were "at risk" for AIDS because they were homosexual, rather than because they were victims of a massive scale clinical trial gone awry. The MMWR letter cleverly avoided discussion of the harmful initial formulation, while the private Johns Hopkins study addressed it directly.

Ironically, as 59% of the 320 vaccine subjects evaluated in the Johns Hopkins study were said to have seroconverted by 1988, there is a stronger correlation between the experimental hepatitis B vaccine and HIV than there is between HIV and AIDS, given only a 37% HIV infection rate in Gallo's AIDS patient sera.

The real question has never been answered. What causes AIDS? Was the initial wave of AIDS caused by a viral agent introduced to gay men in the experimental formulation of the hepatitis B vaccine, that may or may not have been HIV ? Did HIV become less virulent after 1984 as the human biology adapted? Or was there another co-factor at play, an as yet unknown?

What is clear is that 1980s American AIDS (KS, PCP pneumonia) is not the same as present day American AIDS. Most deaths attributed to modern Ameriacn AIDS are intestinal parasites like cryptosporidim, or HAART induced liver or heart failure. African AIDS has always been the usual tropical disease profile, malaria, TB, intestinal parasites. How ever many times UNAIDS uses the prefix "HIV-related," the fact is those diseases ravaged human populations, including early century United States, before sanitation and clean water systems were widely implemented.

Could the 1979-1981 forumlation of the hepatitis B vaccine be a missing link to the apocryphal mysteries of AIDS ? Was early HIV an artifact of the hepatits B vaccine, and initial first-contacts of the experimental vaccine recipients? Did HIV's virulence decrease as human physiolgy adapted?

Could experimental vaccines, including smallpox, and polio, administered to millions in Africa over decades, be a co-factor in susceptiblity to tropical diseases, now according to UNAIDS and other organizations, all HIV-related?

Is HIV altogether a smokescreen for large-scale laboratory mistakes? Is HIV an engine of medical colonialism and a locus of the ersatz charity with which the West victimizes Africa by shipping toxic drugs rather than helping to build water filtration systems and implement a modern sanitation infrastructure?

The answers will only be revealed if the facts are studied in an unemotional, uncensored, and scientific manner.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
THE VACCINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX:
THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL SYSTEM
"ABOVE TOP SECRET: SILENCE ANYONE WHO EXPOSES IT"


Chapter 14 of Police State Planning:
http://www.policestateplanning.com/download/psrm.pdf
Web Page for Chapter 14:
http://www.industryinet.com/~ruby/political_medical_agenda.html


The real power, the power we have to fight for night and day, is not power over things, but over men,  - George Orwell, 1984

The elite do not make any moral distinction between human beings and animals. At best they view the planet as a safari park, farm, and nature reserve in which the human population is their greatest threat as well as their greatest resource. Throughout the twentieth century the elite have used physical and social sciences to restrict population growth, manipulate human health, and advance eugenics. This chapter has been saved until last because it is the most frightening section of this book. Indeed humanity in its current form may well be in it's final chapter. Without reading the previous chapters, this one makes little sense. How could a holocaust on such a scale be perpetrated in broad daylight in the Western world over an entire century? Chapter 2 describes how the elite gained control of the mainstream media. This one describes how they gained absolute control over official public health policy and the education of doctors and scientists.

14.1 FUNDING POPULATION CONTROL

On the Rockefeller University's website homepage on 3 December 2003, there was a picture of a crowded city market with the following caption beneath:

It took from the beginning of time until 1950 to put the first 2.5 billion people on the planet. Yet in the next half-century, an increase that exceeds the total population of the world in 1950 will occur, So writes Joel E. Cohen, Ph.D., Dr.P.H., professor and head of the Laboratory of Populations at The Rockefeller University and Columbia University, in a Viewpoint article in the November 14 issue of the journal Science. (1)

Limiting population growth has been a preoccupation of the European and American elite throughout the twentieth century. The Population Council was established in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller III. In Europe there is the multi-billion dollar World Wildlife Fund sponsored by British and Dutch Royalty and the ultra elite think-tank, The Club of Rome. The U.N.'s population control activities receive funding from all the major charitable foundations, such as the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundations. Ted Turner's $1 billion United Nations Foundation and the $24 billion Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are entirely devoted to population control activities disguised as public health campaigns.

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) is the world's largest international source of overt funding for population and reproductive health programmes. Since it began operations in 1969, the Fund has provided nearly $6 billion in 'assistance' to developing countries. (2) The UNFPA only manages one quarter of the world's population control budget for developing countries making total funding in excess of $1 billion per year. (3) The Netherlands, Britain, and Japan were by far the biggest funders of UNFPA in 2001 providing almost 50% of the total $396 million income demonstrating that this is an international agenda. (4) In many countries USAID gives substantially more money to population control programs than to healthcare and food assistance. (5)

AIMS

The population control agenda is presented to the public as a universal concern for planetary resources and environmental pollution, and to a lesser degree, socio-economic deprivation, women's rights, and reproductive health. Whatever the truth of these arguments, the point is that population control is precisely that: coercive. When you look at the policy papers on population control, the objectives for limiting population growth are so extreme that coercion would be required however much population control advocates deny it. Take the benchmark environmentalist publication The Limits To Growth,1972, with it's doomsday predictions of planetary meltdown by 2050 unless radical limits to population growth were imposed. In 1974 it was translated into hard U.S. national security policy by National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger. The lengthy National Security Study Memorandum 200 laid out the aims, timescale, and methods of U.S. foreign policy for limiting the growth of 'lesser developed countries'. (6) Measures were to be taken to keep the world's population growing beyond 8 billion, meaning 500 million fewer people by year 2000 and 3 billion fewer by 2050. However this was nowhere near the true objectives of the elite and their Malthusian collaborators. They fully intend to cut the world's current population in half. This requires the biggest campaign of genocide in human history. American population control think tank, Negative Population Growth Inc., recommended in 1992 that the population of the U.S. should be 125-150 million, requiring a 50% cut from it's current level. (7)

This call for a 50% cut was repeated in the March/April 1996 issue of Foreign Affairs, journal of the Rockefeller directed Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the elite policy making institution for the U.S. government. (8) The emblem of the Council on Foreign Relations is a naked man riding a white horse. The man on the white horse of Revelation 6:1-2 is the first of the four horsemen of the apocalypse. As New Ager, Barbara Marx Hubbard said, 'We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.'

14.2 THE ART OF KILLING QUIETLY

In NSSM 200, Henry Kissinger stated that no single approach would "solve" the population problem. Multiple and seemingly unconnected approaches are also less likely to attract attention.

14.2.1 ENVIRONMENTALISM

The environmental movement has been an important tool for justifying population control programs. In the UNESCO Courier of November 1991, Jacques Cousteau wrote:

The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics - it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshis. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it. (9)

The Daily Telegraph reported that banning the pesticide DDT in the early 1970s was a huge victory for the population controllers. DDT was introduced as an insecticide in the 1940s and promised to eradicate malaria one of the world's biggest natural killers. Despite all the scientific evidence to the contrary, the powerful environmental lobby declared it dangerous so it was banned. As a result hundreds of millions of lives have been lost to malaria unnecessarily. (10) Alexander King, president of the The Club of Rome, wrote:

My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it had almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT,in hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem. (11)

14.2.2 PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND WESTERN MEDICINE

THE DRUGS TRUST

As described in chapter 7, the pharmaceutical industry is a multi-trillion dollar business and healthcare spending consumes a significant proportion of Western GDP. One family has played a key role in the development of the pharmaceutical industry: The Rockefellers. As described in chapters 2 and 4, the Rockefellers invested in the German chemical and pharmaceutical giant I.G. Farben in the 1930s. In America, Sterling Drug, Inc., was the main cog and largest holding company in the Rockefeller drug empire in the first half of the 20th Century. (12) Today, Rockefeller owned Bristol- Myers Squibb Inc. accounts for nearly half of the chemotherapy sales in the world. (13)

The five leading private medical research institutes in the U.S. are either controlled by or affiliated with the Rockefellers: Rockefeller University, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Cold Spring Harbour Laboratories. These institutes conduct cutting edge medical research which affects the world's entire health care system.

A brief chronology of John D. Rockefeller's investments in healthcare:
1889-1909 Est. The University of Chicago
1901 Est. The Rockefeller Institute For Medical Research, now Rockefeller University
1909 Est. Rockefeller Sanitary Commission for Eradication of Hookworm Disease
1910 In partnership with the Harriman family, funded the Station for Experimental Evolution and Eugenics Records Office in Cold Spring Harbour.
1914 Est. The China Medical Board (14)

The $65 million endowment of the Rockefeller Institute dwarfed the budget of the Public Health Service in the first three decades of 20th century. (15) Rockefeller University is a world leading centre for pharmaceutical medicine. It's website boasts:
In its history, Rockefeller has been associated with 22 Nobel laureates and 18 Lasker Award recipients. Five faculty members have been named MacArthur Fellows and 11 have garnered the National Medal of Science, the highest science award given by the United States. And, 34 Rockefeller faculty are elected members of the National Academy of Sciences... Rockefeller forges collaborations with biotech and pharmaceutical companies as needed to speed research findings into development to improve patient care. (16)

The world's premier AIDS research institution, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Centre, is affiliated to the Rockefeller University by academic, infrastructural, and administrative ties. (17) Established in 1991, ADARC is the world's largest private research laboratory devoted solely to biomedical research on HIV/AIDS and is currently co-leading China's largest AIDS 'treatment program'. (18) Rockefeller owned Time magazine voted their man at Aaron Diamond, Dr David Ho, 'Man of The Year' in 1996.

The Howard Hughes Medical Institute has worked in partnership with the Rockefeller University since 1986. (19) Founded in 1953, at close of financial year 2002, Howard Hughes Medical Institute endowment was $10.3 billion making it the second largest philanthropy in the USA after the $24 billion Bill Gates Foundation. (20) HHMI currently employs seven Nobel prize winners. .(21) Current Trustees include James A Baker III and CEO of the Hughes Corporation, William R Lummis. In 1987 World Bank President James D Wolfensohn was elected as trustee. (22)

The Rockefeller University has close ties with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. (23) During early 1970s Laurence S. Rockefeller sat on the board of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre and was trustee of the Sloan Foundation. (24) The Rockefeller University archive reveals that the Rockefellers provided substantial endowment for Memorial Sloan-Kettering. The New York Cancer Hospital, which was founded in 1884, was one of the first hospitals devoted entirely to the research and treatment of cancer. Later known as the General Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases (1899-1916) and then as Memorial Hospital, it was vastly expanded and modernized in 1936 as a result of contributions by John D. Rockefeller II and the General Education Board. The Sloan foundation was founded in 1934 by Alfred P. Sloan Chairman of General Motors. In 1945, the Sloan-Kettering Institute was created to conduct intensive research in oncology. The two separate corporate entities forged a close relationship between clinical and laboratory research, and in 1960 the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center was formed to serve as an administrative umbrella for the hospital and institute. (25) Rockefeller's modernization involved relocating Memorial to a new site just across the street from Rockefeller University. (26) Nelson A. Rockefeller was a Member of Westchester County (NY) Board of Health from January 1933 to  June 1953. (27) Westchester became home to the Phelps Hospital founded in 1952 with Rockefeller money. With a donation of 66 acres on the Hudson River and $500,000 by the Arthur Curtis James Foundation, along with a pledge of $800,000 toward the project by John D. Rockefeller II, the new hospital was born. (28) The Phelps Hospital is now one of the sites of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre. (29) James Robinson III, Chairman of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Board of Overseers and Managers, is also a director of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Richard Gelb, Vice-Chairman of the MSKCC board, is Bristol-Myers Chairman of the Board. Richard Furlaud, another MSKCC board member, recently retired as Bristol-Myers' president. (30)

The Station for Experimental Evolution and The Eugenics Records Office was endowed with funds from the Rockefeller and Harriman families in 1910. (31) Since the 1970s, the re-named Cold Spring Harbour Laboratories have been home to the world's cutting edge research programmes on cancer but also researches neurobiology, plant genetics, genomics, and bioinformatics. James Watson, co-discoverer of DNA, was it's Director from1969 to 1994 and it is undertaking work to map the human genome on behalf of The Human Genome Project. (32) The early research into eugenics at Cold Spring was mirrored by the Rockefellers funding of racial hygiene research in Germany at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry in Munich and The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics, and Human Heredity in Berlin in the late 1920s. (33)

The major source of medical research funding at American universities besides the Rockefeller University has come from The Rockefeller Foundation. According to The Drug Story by Maurice Bealle, an investigation into Rockefeller influence on medicine published in 1949, the Rockefeller Foundation gave away almost half a billion dollars to American Universities in the previous 44 years:
Harvard, with its well-publicized medical school, has received $8,764,433 of Rockefeller's Drug Trust money, Yale got $7,927,800, Johns Hopkins $10,418,531, Washington University in St. Louis $2,842,132, New York's Columbia University $5,424,371, Cornell University $1,709,072, etc., etc. (34)

The Rockefellers were directly involved with the establishment of American public health institutions and policy. In 1938 Jewish German researchers fleeing Hitler arrived in America to be welcomed at the newly founded National Institutes of Health built on " a privately donated estate " in Bethesda from John D. Rockefeller. (35) This remains the home of the NIH today. Nelson A. Rockefeller was Under Secretary of Department of Health, Education, and Welfare from June 1953 to January 1955. Prior to this appointment he was Chairman, Special Committee on Defense Organization from February 1953 to April 1953 and afterwards Consultant to Secretary of Defense on Organization of the Department of Defense from January 1958 to April 1958. Between January 1953 and December 1958 he was Chairman, President's Advisory Committee on Government Organization. Rockefeller took the HEW job to reorganize the health department to meet the secrecy requirements of U.S. biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons programme which required substantial testing on unwitting American and Canadian citizens, as described in the section on AIDS below. (36) Laurence S. Rockefeller was also on the board of the Community Blood Council of Greater NY, funded by the Sloan Foundation.(37) Rockefeller University faculty boasts 34 National Academy of Science members and eight of the New York Academy of Sciences' Council currently work for Rockefeller connected companies or institutions. (38)

THE BUSINESS WITH DISEASE

Charges of genocide against the Drugs Trust are appropriate on three counts:
Pharmaceuticals do not cure diseases;
Pharmaceuticals kill people;
Pharmaceuticals are forced upon the public by government and natural effective alternatives are denied.

Given the first two charges, it might seem impossible for the third to be accomplished in a free society. This is how it's done: 1) Laws and regulations controlling medical treatments, mainly administered by agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. and The Medicines Control Agency in the U.K. mandate which treatments are safe, effective, and legal; 2) Professional medical associations who licence doctors dictate what treatments can be prescribed; 3) The British and European model of socialized medicine allows the government health departments to decide health policy and purchase treatment on behalf of the public which almost never includes non-drug based treatments; 4) Medical research bodies controlled by the Drugs Trust and the government influence the policies of the previous three. 1, 2, and 3 are the Gestapo strong arm of the cartel whilst method 4 is the propaganda arm. The western public health-care system is the epitome of fascism. Recent articles in the mainstream media and medical journals have revealed the tip of the public death-care iceberg. Killing 250,000 patients a year, doctors are the third leading cause of death in the U.S. according to the Journal of American Medical Association. (39) The recent editorial in The Lancet (Vol. 359, No. 9313; 2002) warned of the corruption of Western medicine by drug companies. The editors of this most esteemed scientific journal asked, "Just how tainted has medicine become [by pharmaceutical industry payoffs]?" They concluded, "Heavily, and damagingly so," urging "doctors who support this culture for the best of intentions" to "have the courage to oppose practices that bring the whole of medicine into disrepute." (40) Up to half the articles on drugs which appear in mainstream medical journals are written by ghost writers employed by drug companies not the named authors. (41) Congressman Dan Burton, who has been investigating vaccines for four years as Chairman of the Dan Burton Committee on Government Reform on The Status of Research into Vaccine Safety and Autism, said conflicts at the CDC are a problem, particularly on the vaccine advisory panel. He believes vaccines triggered his grandson's autism:
This presents a real paradox when the CDC routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on influential advisory committees that make  recommendations on new vaccines, as well as policy matters... All the while these same scientists have financial ties, academic affiliations, and other vested interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight. (42)

Dr Matthias Rath, research colleague of Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling and Director of Cardiovascular Research at the Linus Pauling Institute in Palo Alto, California, is a world expert in nutritional medicine. (43) On 14 June 2003, Dr Rath filed a complaint at the International Criminal Court in The Hague against the pharmaceutical industry. The charges brought were genocide and other crimes against humanity committed in connection with the pharmaceutical industry's business with disease:
The accused willfully and systematically maintain cardiovascular diseases, including high blood pressure, heart failure, diabetic complications and other diseases, cancer, infectious diseases including AIDS, osteoporosis and many other of today's most common diseases that are recognized to be largely preventable by natural means. The accused have deliberately caused the unnecessary suffering and premature death of hundreds of millions of people. The accused systematically and deliberately prevent the eradication of cardiovascular disease, cancer and other diseases by obstructing and blocking the dissemination of life-saving information on the health benefits of natural non-patentable therapies. Thereby, the accused have deliberately caused further unnecessary suffering and the premature death of hundreds of millions of people. The accused deliberately and systematically expand existing diseases and creating new diseases by manufacturing and marketing pharmaceutical drugs with short-term symptomatic relief but with known and detrimental long-term side-effects. Thereby the accused have deliberately caused further unnecessary suffering and premature death of hundreds of millions of people. ((44)

In 1996 the U.N Codex Alimentarius Commission launched a world-wide initiative to restrict access to natural medicines. The Codex has been translated into hard law by the E.U. (45) In August 2005, The European Food Supplements Directive will become law across the E.U. including the U.K.. This will remove over 5000 vitamin formulations from U.K. shops and dramatically cut the dosage of many others. The Herbal Medicines Directive under consideration by the European Parliament will prevent any new herbal formulas ever coming onto the market and remove any herbal product which hasn't had a proven track record in the E.U.. The Pharmaceuticals Directive seeks to expand the scope of the drug classification. In it's current wording even food or water can be included as a substance which 'restores, corrects, or modifies physiological functions'.

The banning of over-the-counter natural medicine will create a two tier planetary health system as the E.U. laws are imposed in other countries under World Trade Organization 'harmonization' rules - that includes you America. Natural Medicines will be available on prescription only for those that can afford to pay for private consultations whilst the state-run health-care systems will continue to prescribe pharmaceuticals to the public. Furthermore, as soon as the elite have access to ground-breaking life-extension herbal and vitamin formulations denied to the rest of mankind, they will be able to deploy even more aggressive biological and chemical agents against us, since they will be fully protected.

Dr Rath is wrong in his opinion that 'No sinister dark men stand behind the unethical plans of the 'Codex Alimentarius" commission, but unscrupulous shareholders and investors of the pharmaceutical industry bank on it'. (46) The controlling stake in the pharmaceutical industry is held by the same tiny cabal that controls all other industries and they are committed to planetary de-population as their policy papers show. This is the mistake that many courageous investigators make: they focus too narrowly and don't pull back the curtain to see who's pulling the levers and for what purpose. Also, filing a complaint with the International Criminal Court is wishful thinking considering that the U.N. is sponsoring the Codex legislation. A challenge to the E.U. legislation is currently being mounted in the British courts by the Alliance for Natural Health
(see http://www.alliance-natural-health.org/ ).

CANCER

One in three Europeans and one in two Americans will get cancer. Ten million people a year die of cancer worldwide. (47) Despite the trillions of dollars spent on orthodox research and treatment for cancer, the medical establishment is no further forward in finding a cure. That's because the cancer industry is a hugely profitable population control programme. G. Edward Griffin's book, World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17 was first published in 1974. The foreword to the 1997 edition states that absolutely nothing has changed since then except the actors in the plot. Unofficially, vitamin B17 (laetrile) has been found to be an effective treatment for cancer and thousands of Americans travel to Mexico and Germany every year to receive it. In the U.S. laetrile treatment has been effectively suppressed; doctors can face having their licences taken away for prescribing it or even imprisonment in California due to it's anti-quack cancer legislation. In the U.K., it is illegal for anyone other than registered medical practitioners to claim they can cure or treat cancer. (48)

Unfortunately it is the Rockefeller/I.G. Farben monopoly treatment of cancer which is quackery: there is no evidence that chemotherapy or radiotherapy increase life expectancy. In fact both are extremely toxic and often lethal treatments which themselves destroy the patient's immune system and cause cancer and death.

Dr. Lorraine Day is an internationally acclaimed orthopedic trauma surgeon and best selling author. She spent 15 years on the faculty of the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine as Associate Professor and Vice Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics. She was also Chief of Orthopedic Surgery at San Francisco General Hospital and is recognized world-wide as an AIDS expert. Ten years ago she contracted breast cancer and reached the terminal stage with a huge tumor. However she refused orthodox treatment and devised for herself a ten point plan which didn't involve drugs or even vitamin supplements. Cancer is the consequence of a dysfunctional immune system, poor diet, lifestyle and environmental factors and therefore it is completely preventable and curable by the same means. Dr. Day, like many thousands of others, is alive and well today by taking matters into her own hands. She is roundly attacked in the mainstream press for her crusade against the fraud of the cancer industry and the drug industry in general. You can see pictures of her tumor at http://www.drday.com/.

VACCINES: THE WEAPON OF CHOICE IN THE WAR ON POPULATION

It is a contradiction that self-proclaimed environmentalists and population control advocates would spend billions of dollars on vaccine programs allegedly trying to save the lives of millions of people in the Third World. The grim reality is that they are covertly murdering and sterilizing these poor people under the guise of public health. After their success with using vaccines to introduce AIDS in the 1970s, in 1999 the elite launched one of the biggest genocidal operations in history, The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (unholy alliance?), a partnership of the who's who in population control: The Rockefeller Foundation, the $24 billion Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the United Nations Foundation ( a $1 billion endowment by Ted Turner), The World Bank, The World Health Organization and Western governments. (49)

Even the American Vaccination Adverse Event Reporting Systems (VAERS) set up in 1990, gives indication of the carnage caused by vaccines. 90% of all adverse reactions go un-reported to VAERS and chronic conditions which emerge months or years later, such as autism, auto-immune diseases, allergies, cancer, and neurodevelopment disorders, are not officially recognized as consequences of vaccinations anyway. (50) The report by United Press International should be read bearing this in mind:

As of the end of last year, the system contained 244,424 total reports of possible reactions to vaccines, including 99,145 emergency room visits, 5,149 life-threatening reactions, 27,925 hospitalizations, 5,775 disabilities, and 5,309 deaths, according to data compiled by Dr. Mark Geier, a vaccine researcher in Silver Spring, Md. The data represents roughly 1 billion doses of vaccines, according to Geier. (51)

The mission of GAVI and the Vaccine Fund, creatures of the international population control cabal, is to ensure that 'all the world's children have equal access to lifesaving vaccines'. The more malnourished a child is the more likely it is to suffer a severe reaction to immune-suppressing vaccinations, especially when they are given in combination.

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
IMMUNE SUPPRESSION

Because they do not elicit a proper immune response vaccinations give live viruses and other live vaccine contaminants such as mycoplasma a major head-start to life in the human body. Micro-organisms evade the cellular immune response through injection into the body and they also take advantage of significant immune suppression caused by the vaccination itself. Dr. Russell Blaylock points to a recent study of a pertussis (whooping cough) epidemic among children in which eighty percent of the cases had been vaccinated against it. (52) Epidemiological studies demonstrate that vaccinations have had no impact on the eradication of infectious disease whatsoever. Improvements in sanitation and living standards during the twentieth century caused these diseases to decline before mass vaccination campaigns. (53) Worse still according to Dr. Blaylock, research found that 20% of measles vaccines recipients have chronic measles infections in their brains later in life indicating that live virus vaccines create greater risk of developing the disease. The Sabin oral polio vaccine (OPV) is the only known cause of polio in the U.S. today. (54)

Dr. Archie Kalokerinos is a Life Fellow of the Royal Society for Health, a Fellow of the International Academy of Preventive Medicine, Fellow of the Australasian College of Biomedical Scientists, Fellow of the Hong Kong Medical Technology Association, and a Member of the New York Academy of Sciences. In 1978 he was awarded the A.M.M.(Australian Medal of Merit) for 'outstanding scientific research'. On the subject of vaccines he comments:
My final conclusion after forty years or more in this business [medicine] is that the unofficial policy of the World Health Organization and the unoffical policy of the 'Save the Children's Fund' and... [other vaccine promoting] organizations is one of murder and genocide... I cannot see any other possible explanation... You cannot immunize sick children, malnourished children, and expect to get away with it. You'll kill far more children than would have died from natural infection."It was similar with the measles vaccination. They went through Africa, South America and elsewhere, and vaccinated sick and starving children... They thought they were wiping out measles, but most of those susceptible to measles died from some other disease that they developed as a result of being vaccinated. The vaccination reduced their immune levels and acted like an infection. Many got septicaemia, gastro-enteritis, etc, or made their nutritional status worse and they died from malnutrition. So there were very few susceptible infants left alive to get measles. It's one way to get good statistics, kill all those that are susceptible, which is what they literally did." (55)

American children receive up to forty vaccinations before the age of two. Dr. H.H. Fudenberg, world-renowned immunologist with hundreds of publications to his credit, made the following comments: "One vaccine decreases cell-mediated immunity by 50%, two vaccines by 70%…all triple vaccines (MMR, DTaP) markedly impair cell-mediated immunity, which predisposes to recurrent viral infections." (56) Like HIV, the measles virus is particularly immune suppressing hence the danger of the live virus measles vaccine. In 2001 GAVI launched an initiative to vaccinate all 200 million children in sub-Saharan Africa where HIV infection is rampant. (57)

In the early 1970's the medical establishment came up with a diagnosis of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) to hide the fact that vaccines were killing thousands of babies all over the world every year. The greatest challenge to this particular facet of the genocidal agenda is being mounted right now by The Yurko Project in Florida. Most of the parents who contact the Yurko Project for help state that their child died shortly after receiving vaccinations. (58) Alan and Francine Yurko have rallied an army of scientists and doctors from around the world who know that their baby was not shaken to death by it's father, but actually died as a result of a reaction to a cocktail of vaccines. (59) Once you have read their story you will see how evil the elite really are. Black or white, rich or poor, it doesn't matter; they imprison hundreds of parents and caregivers every year to cover up their genocidal vaccine program. (60) 

VACCINE CONTAMINANTS

As well as the dangerous assault on fragile immune systems by the vaccine's active ingredients, there are live contaminants in vaccines. Take for example the polio vaccine administered to thirty million Americans during the the late fifties and early sixties. It is now public record that it was 'accidentally contaminated' with the monkey virus SV40 which is now responsible for an epidemic of cancers. The beneficiary of this 'accident' is The Drugs Trust and the population controllers. (61)

When SV40 was discovered in rhesus monkey kidney cells during the early 1960s the manufacturers switched rapidly to cells from African green monkeys. However Dr John Martin, an FDA scientist reports that the contamination of these cells with a monkey cytomegalovirus has been suppressed since 1972. To date his requests to have the vaccine properly tested have gone unanswered by the FDA because the manufacturers can hide behind "proprietary interests". Isn't that reassuring to know that the regulators of vaccines will not test for contaminants in the products they are supposed to be regulating? Dr Martin now works as an independent researcher studying the role of this stealth virus in chronic illnesses. (62)

VACCINES FOR STERILIZATION

The World Health Organization has a twenty year history of developing contraceptive vaccines which work by creating immunity to the body's own fertility hormone, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HcG). (63) A BBC documentary program entitled Horizon: The Human Laboratory aired 5 November 1995, revealed how the W.H.O developed vaccines for sterilizing women by the mid 1990'S. They got caught giving it to women without informed consent in the Philippines by putting in the tetanus shots. (64) After the recipients of the vaccine started having miscarriages a study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association on behalf of the Philippine Department of Health revealed that almost 20 percent of the tetanus vaccine sampled positive for HcG. (65)

MERCURY

Mercury is a powerful carcinogen because it inhibits DNA repair enzymes. Drug Manufacturers have used thimerosal, which contains ethyl-mercury, as a preservative in multi-dose vials of vaccine since the 1930s. Neuro-surgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock comments on the neuro-toxicity of thimerosal:

...if the parents new how dangerous this was, and how much was known about it, and if the elderly and middle aged people knew just how much was known about the toxicity of the mercury they are getting with each one of these influenza vaccines, they would be absolutely horrified. The parents would be ready to march on Washington, because we have absolute proof that that mercury dramatically interferes with the development of those children's brains, it increases the degeneration of the connections in their brains and it impairs their brains for lifetime. And there is a very close correlation with autism, ADD and learning disorders. In older people we know that the doses of mercury each year or each six months dramatically increases their risk of developing degenerative brain disorders like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. There is no question about this... these things have been proven in numerous laboratories. But the problem is there's so much money being made from promoting vaccination, this research is being kept from the public, so they won't know the danger they're in. (66)

The United Press International investigation into the vaccine controversy reported that, depending on what vaccines a child got during that period, a visit to the doctor during the 1990's may have exposed some children to 125 times the limit on mercury set by the Environmental Protection Agency. Since the mid-1980s the CDC has doubled the number of vaccines children get, up to nearly 40 doses before age 2. Autism has increased tenfold since the mid-1980s to an astonishing one child in every 300. (67) On 7 July 1999, The American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Public Health Service issued a joint statement calling for the removal of thimerosal from vaccines following a risk assessment by the FDA. However Dr. Mark Geier, an expert witness on vaccine cases, states that major manufacturers are still using thimerosal and that children are being injected with more mercury than ever in 2003. His study published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons in April 2003 concludes that there is a strong link between thimerosal exposure and neurodevelopment disorders and heart disease. One in eight American children require special education due to brain impairment. That number is expected to rise to one in five. (68)(69)

In March 2003, Congressman Dan Burton introduced a bill to ban thimerosal from all vaccines. (70)

INFLAMMATORY DISEASE AND CANCER

Most adverse reactions to vaccines are not immediately fatal. However, Dr. Russell Blayock points out the relationship between inflammatory disease and cancer. Medical research found that 76% of cancer patients had developed an inflammatory disease 7-13 years before they got cancer. (71) The reason is that inflammation produces large amounts of free-radicals that damage DNA causing cells to become carcinogenic.

The connection between vaccines and inflammatory disease is strong. Inflammatory diseases plaguing Western nations include: Type one diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, hay fever and other allergies, multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barre, amyotrophic-lateral- sclerosis/motor neuron disease, Stevens-Johnson's syndrome, Lupus, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Huntington's, Crohn's colitis and irritable bowel syndrome. In the U.S. asthma in children has doubled in the last twenty years coinciding with the doubling of childhood vaccines. (72)

Take for example, the Merck & Co.'s documentation on the adverse reactions to it's Hepatitis B vaccine published in the Physician's Desk Reference. Some of the inflammatory and autoimmune diseases listed include Guillain-Barre, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, lupus and Stevens-Johnson's syndrome. (73)

Researchers at the University of Western Ontario determined that ten of eleven fireman tested after the administration of hepatitis B vaccination had developed rheumatoid arthritis. (74)

SmithKline Beecham produced a vaccine for Lyme disease called Lymerix in 1996. By October 2000 it had been given to 1.4 million people according to the Centers for Disease Control. However, the company pulled the vaccine off the market in February 2002 after 25% of recipients developed chronic arthritic symptoms. (75)

The science of immunology is extremely complex but vaccination critics believe that the fundamental problem with vaccines is the injection of foreign substances directly into the body. Normally microorganisms have to pass through the mucous membranes in the mouth and gastro-intestinal tract which triggers a cellular immune response which precedes the anti-body or humoral response. Injected micro organisms completely by-pass the mucousal / cellular immune system and directly trigger the anti-body-producing plasma cells in the bone marrow. This permanently skews the immune system towards a humoral response which is very hard to correct. Immune systems biased towards humoral immunity are associated with autoimmune diseases and allergies. The acute inflammatory response which characterizes allergic reactions is triggered when the humoral immune system produces the substance immuno-globulin E.

Autoimmune diseases can also be caused by the virus itself as well as by modification to the cellular/humoral balance of the immune system. Viruses and other live vaccine contaminants such as mycoplasmas frequently have surface proteins which are similar to those in the human body, particularly in the brain and nervous system. (76) It is well established in the scientific literature that genes can be transferred between microorganisms and human cells. Any slight genetic changes to the surface proteins of human cells by genetic transfer from micro-organisms or vice-versa can lead to an auto-immune response against the body. (77)(78)

14.2.3 GERM WARFARE: AIDS [Click here for relevant radio interviews]

In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation - HRH Prince Philip, reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August, 1988.

By 2020 UNAIDS estimates seventy million will have died from AIDS. (79) There is scientific controversy over what causes Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Not all researchers agree that the HIV virus causes AIDS. Some believe that AIDS is caused by the toxic drugs such as AZT used to treat the infection or is a cumulative result of malnutrition and other environmental and lifestyle factors.

However a much more convincing and scientifically grounded explanation has been provided by Donald Scott, President of The Common Cause Medical Research Foundation. Perhaps this is why  The National Institutes of Health and Rockefellers' Exxon Mobil subscribe to the Foundation's, Journal of Degenerative Diseases. Donald Scott agrees with everything contained in the ground-breaking book Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola published in 1996 by Harvard Public Health graduate and practicing dentist Dr. Leonard Horowitz. Horowitz documents beyond reasonable doubt that AIDS was manufactured in the laboratories of American universities and U.S. military biological warfare contractors during the 1960s and 70s disguised as the Special Virus Cancer Programme of The National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute. The institutions charged with protecting public health were and still are instruments of the most vicious genocidal agenda. The documentation uncovered by Dr. Horowitz is reproduced in the book so no doctor or person interested in AIDS can excuse themselves from reading it. Dr. Horowitz was able to build on the work of Dr. Robert Strecker whose work on AIDS in the early 1980s led him to dig out THE key document on the military origin of the virus. More of that later. As Dr. Strecker first pointed out, HIV is genomically very similar to the Visna virus of sheep and the Bovine Leukemia Virus of cattle. Horowitz was able to prove that the The Special Virus Cancer Program 1964-1978, called Special Virus Leukemia Program until 1968, involved recombining animal immuno-deficiency and cancer viruses. Self proclaimed co-discoverer of HIV, Dr. Bob Gallo was a senior SVCP scientist. Most of the SVCP reports were shredded during the Watergate scandal but many surviving copies of the 15 annual progress reports have been retrieved. Horowitz concludes that HIV was introduced to gay males in the U.S. and blacks in Africa simultaneously in the late 70s through experimental vaccine programs, in particular the hepatitis B vaccine developed by Merck, Sharpe, and Dohm Inc. Horowitz's book has received endorsement from one of the world's leading microbiologists and researchers on Gulf War Illness and former consultant to the U.S. Defense Dept., Dr. Garth Nicolson who states:" One cannot fail to grasp the explosive significance of this book and its main thesis, that biological weapons programs developed and field tested immune-system-destroying agents that now cannot be contained. " Dr. John Martin, a former Food and Drug Administration insider and expert on the cover-up of animal virus contamination of human polio vaccines wrote the foreword to the book.

However, Emerging Viruses did not address the key question posed by the AIDS dissidents such as Dr. Peter Duesberg: Does HIV really cause AIDS? Now Dr. Horowitz and Donald Scott have now been able to answer that question with a resounding 'no'. AIDS is in fact a binary biological weapon. Binary weapons have at least two components which only produce the desired result when used in combination. The second organism identified by world experts on AIDS is an a-typical bacteria called  mycoplasma. Until recently most doctors hadn't even heard of mycoplasma even though it is documented in the scientific literature going back a hundred years. The reason that it is not on the Rockefeller- directed medical syllabus in Western universities is because of it's biological warfare application. Research on mycoplasma is documented in the SVCP progress reports. Unlike viruses and conventional bacteria, mycoplasma are uniquely dependent on the uptake of pre-formed sterols from host cells. This means they can deplete the endocrine system of vital sterols used to produce hormones. According to SVCP report no. 9,1972, in order to activate HIV and other retro-viruses it was first necessary to suppress the immune system by, 'physiological alteration of the endocrine balance'. Certain pesticides and chemicals were also noted to have this effect which does lend support to the AIDS dissidents belief that toxic drugs can cause AIDS.

Donald Scott and other researchers have found that the mycoplasma is the cause of a wide range of disabling chronic illnesses which are either new or on the increase in the West. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or Myalgic Encephalomyelitis appeared at the same time as AIDS at the end of the late 70's. Laboratory testing confirms that the majority of CFS patients are infected with mycoplasma as well as patients suffering from a wide range of other neuro-systemic degenerative diseases. Disabling diseases are an effective economic weapon but they also have a population control application because there is a strong link between inflammatory diseases and cancer.

Dr. Garth Nicolson agrees with Donald Scott that the mycoplasma causes immune suppression and therefore enhances the pathogenesis of HIV:

Pathogenic Mycoplasma species may influence HIV pathogenesis by specific and direct activation or suppression of the immune system (80)

Dr. Nicolson's professional expertise in Polymerase Chain Reaction testing also brought him to the conclusion that similarities between the surface components of both organisms enables M. fermentans to bind to HIV. He was roundly attacked by scientific colleagues when he suggested that the HIV -1 envelope gene had been inserted into certain mycoplasmas in the laboratory:

Mycoplasmas possessing the HIV-1 env gene could allegedly have been engineered to make them more invasive and pathogenic and more difficult to find. The HIV-1 env gene encodes a surface glycoprotein, gp120, that is involved in virus attachment and entry into cells through receptors on the cell surface. This could result in opportunistic cell attachment and penetration of many types of cells and most tissues.(81)

This connection between mycoplasma and HIV and indication that mycoplasma have been genetically engineered is evidenced by the U.S. army's own patent on M. fermentans incognitus strain filed by Dr. Shyh-Ching Lo in 1993. The patent no. 5,242,820 gives the American Registry of Pathology proprietary rights over methods of detecting the organism and development of vaccines for it.(82) The patent gives some important background information on the question of whether or not HIV causes AIDS. Dr. Lo states: 'the human retroviruses have not fulfilled Koch's postulates, ie. producing transmissible AIDS-like diseases in experimental animals'. When the researchers infected human t-cells with HIV in the test tube, they eventually recovered from the initial cytocidal effects and remained persistently infected. However when M. fermentans incognitus was added, the cells died. Outside of the laboratory, the army researchers report that 26 out of 32 patients (81.25%) with HIV and showing symptoms of AIDS were infected with M. fermentans incognitus.(83)
Dr. Lo concluded that this organism was indeed a very likely co-factor in the progression of AIDS.

The patent also states:

Some of these patients who are infected with M. fermentans incognitus will be patients who have been diagnosed as having AIDS or ARC, chronic fatigue syndrome, Wegener's diseases, sarcoidosis, respiratory distress syndrome, Kibuchi's disease, autoimmune diseases such as as collagen vascular disease and Lupus and chronic debilitating diseases such as Alzheimer's disease.

Dr. Nicolson's research on mycoplasma has also confirmed the significance of a mycoplasma in a wide range of neuro-systemic degenerative diseases. 100% of Gulf War Illness patients who developed amyotrophic-lateral-sclerosis tested positive for mycoplasma infection. The co-discoverer of HIV, Dr. Luc Montagnier, acknowledges that most researchers in the AIDS field argue against the necessity of cofactors. However he emphasizes the need to research the mycoplasma as a virulence factor of HIV:

[ i]t is a deplorable fact that to this day, the number of researchers interested in this line of investigation worldwide barely exceeds the number of fingers on both hands.(84)

The reason why official public health policy has ignored the role of the mycoplasma and focused on HIV is because mycoplasma is a type of bacteria and therefore can be treated successfully with long-term administration of inexpensive antibiotics such as doxycycline. The U.S. army patent reads:

M. fermentans incognitus is known to be sensitive to a number of antibiotics, including doxycycline, quinalones such as ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol and tetracycline. Therefore, effective treatment of any of the above implicated diseases should include administration of antibiotics to which M. fermentans incognitus is sensitive.

This means that HIV infected individuals would be unlikely to develop AIDS if they were properly tested for the co-factor mycoplasma using PCR and then given antibiotic therapy with proper nutritional support. PCR testing for mycoplasma is not offered by the U.K.'s National Health Service, or indeed any public health service in the world. Only a handful of specialist research laboratories such as Dr. Nicolson's in California, offer these tests. Dr. Nicolson's work on testing and treating Gulf War Illness victims for mycoplasma infection has been rejected and even sabotaged by the U.S. Defense Dept.(85) Treatments for AIDS is being denied because mainstream  medical research is controlled by the elite. On 30 April 2000, the Washington Post reported that the U.S. National Security Council had declared AIDS a threat to national security and therefore would be involved with directing AIDS research, the first time it had ever been involved in fighting an infectious disease.(86) Horowitz comments:

According to U.S. government watchdog groups, and related policy analysts linked to JuriMed -- a North American alternative medicine advocacy organization -- the new Clinton decree empowers the CIA to act against scientific "dissidents" who raise concerns regarding vaccination policies, as done in this article, as a threat to U.S. national security. The JuriMed communique heralded the likelihood of increased "mainstream [media] blackouts on AIDS dissident positions," and "global disease control" initiatives including "wide-ranging vaccination programs" becoming more coercive.
IMPORTANT READING ON AIDS
Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola - Nature, Accident or Intentional? by Dr. Leonard Horowitz DMD, MA, MPH; Tetrahedron Publishing Group,1996.
See http://www.tetrahedron.org/
The Journal of Degenerative Diseases, especially 2002 Vol 3, no's 3&4 and 2003 Vol 4 no's 2&3. Write to The Common Cause Medical Research Foundation, Box 133 Stn B, Sudbury ON, P3E 4N5, Canada; or contact me if you live in UK.
Key Documents available from The Common Cause Medical Research Foundation

i) Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives Ninety-first Congress, First Session, 9 June 1969.

[Download selected pages: page 1, page 2, page 3, page 4]

This single most important document on AIDS was obtained under Freedom of Information Act by Ted Strecker and Congressman Douglas Huff of Chicago. Both men died mysteriously shortly afterwards in August and September 1988 respectively.(88) Ted Strecker's brother Dr Robert Strecker produced a video called The Strecker Memorandum which later helped Dr. Horowitz investigate the man-made origin of AIDS. Dr. Robert B. Strecker, M.D., Ph.D practices internal medicine and gastro-enterology in Los Angeles. He is a trained pathologist and also holds a Ph.D. in pharmacology. Page 129 of the Hearings records the most significant statements on AIDS ever made. Dr. Donald MacArthur, Deputy Director of Research and Technology, Department of Defense Research and Engineering stated:

Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly, and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired... it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease... A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million... It is a highly controversial issue, and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations.

This is a functional description of AIDS which is currently killing 8000 people a day.

ii) Smallpox Vaccine "triggered Aids Virus", by Pierce Wright, Science Editor, The Times, London, front page, May 11 1987. Un-named insiders from the World Health Organization told The Times that they believed the thirteen year long smallpox eradication program in Africa awakened the dormant HIV virus. The program concluded in 1978 the same time as the first AIDS cases appeared:

The spread of HIV infection coincides with the most intense immunization programs... Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of Aids in that region. About 14,000 Haitians on United Nations secondment to Central Africa, were covered in the campaign. They began to return home at a time when Haiti had become a playground for San Francisco Homosexuals.

This story was never mentioned again by The Times or any other mainstream media outlet after the elite responded to this hair-raising article by imposing complete media censorship. All attempts to get mainstream media attention to the man-made theory of AIDS are blocked. Journalists from mainstream news organizations have approached Donald Scott but the story never gets past the editor. The New York Times refused to review Dr. Horowitz's book Emerging Viruses.

iii) United States Patent 5,242,820, Pathogenic mycoplasma, Lo, 7 Sept. 1993 (also available on-line at U.S. Patent and Trademark Office http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/srchnum.htm

iv) Special Virus Cancer Program Progress Reports of The National Cancer Institute: 1971 (8), 1972 (9), 1976 (13) and 1978 (15). These are referenced in Emerging Viruses and in The Journal of Degenerative Diseases but the complete documents are available from the Common Cause Medical Research Foundation.

v) The Scientific Paper Trail, by Don Scott. A collection of important papers from peer-reviewed journals such as JAMA and The New England Journal of Medicine. Many are referenced in The Journal of Degenerative Diseases.
COMING PLAGUES

Rebuilding America's Defenses, written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC) hints that the U.S. may consider developing biological weapons "that can target specific genotypes [and] may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool "(89)

A short CIA press release entitled The Darker Bioweapons Future states that a panel of experts from the National Academy of Sciences studying the future of biological weapons concluded that 'the effects of these engineered biological agents could be worse than any disease known to man' and that advances in biotechnology will be very hard to police.(90)
14.2.4 JUNK FOOD

The Western diet is a 'slow kill' which largely goes undetected. Three major components, sugar, caffeine, and hydrogenated vegetable oils, open the door for every type of disease by playing havoc with the body's metabolism and immune system. On top of this are the neuro-toxic and cancer causing flavour enhancers which are added to the majority of processed foods and soft drinks especially in the U.S.. A report, Adolescent Health, published by the British Medical Association, in December 2003 stated that the present generation of children and teenagers will turn into the most obese and infertile adults in the history of mankind.(91)
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/the-victims-of-gates-foundation-generosity/

The victims of Gates Foundation generosity
December 17, 2007

“…advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.”

- Project For The New American Century

Struggle to survive: Nurse-midwife Lillo Kuape rushes barely breathing newborn Mankuebe Nyoba to the intensive-care nursery at Queen Elizabeth II Hospital in Maseru, Lesotho. No oxygen was available, and the baby died a few hours later. Donations to fight AIDS, TB and malaria in Africa have inadvertently put many of those with other basic healthcare needs at risk.
By Charles Piller and Doug Smith
LA Times | Dec 16, 2007

MASERU, LESOTHO — Aneighbor shaved Matsepang Nyoba’s head with an antiquated razor. Blood beaded on her scalp. Tears trickled down her cheeks, but not because of the pain. She was in mourning, and this was a ritual. Two days earlier, her newborn baby girl had died in the roach-infested maternity ward of Queen Elizabeth II, a crumbling sprawl that is the largest hospital in Lesotho, a mountainous nation of 2.1 million people surrounded by South Africa. Nyoba, 30, whose given name means “mother, have hope,” has AIDS. But that is not what killed her baby daughter, Mankuebe. Nyoba owes her own life to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has given $8.5 billion to global health causes. Through its grantees, including the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the foundation underwrites, inspires or directs major efforts to prevent, cure or treat those diseases. The fund pays for Nyoba’s costly AIDS medicine. But when she gave birth on a recent Sunday morning, her baby was suffering from a different kind of distress. The infant was limp and barely breathing. A nurse rushed her to the nursery, packed with sick babies, some two to a crib. Jury-rigged stethoscope tubes let six of the babies share lifesaving oxygen from a single valve. There was no oxygen tube for Mankuebe. She asphyxiated for lack of a second valve. It would have cost $35.

Struggling to breathe: The nursery of the Queen Elizabeth II Hospital in Maseru, Lesotho, had only one working oxygen valve. Nurses used plastic hoods connected with rubber tubing to share the single flow of oxygen among as many as six sick infants. The hospital, with no staff to move Mankuebe’s remains to the morgue, placed her body on a shelf near the delivery room while her father arranged for burial. The tiny corpse was swaddled in a baby blanket. A handwritten death notice was stuck to the blanket with a used hypodermic needle. The Gates Foundation, endowed by the personal fortunes of the Microsoft Corp. chairman, his wife and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chairman Warren E. Buffett, has given $650 million to the Global Fund. But the oxygen valve fell outside the priorities of the fund’s grants to Lesotho. Every day, nurses say, one or two babies at the hospital die as Mankuebe did — bypassed in a place where AIDS overshadows other concerns.

ENDGAME: Eugenics Depopulation Program - The Gates Foundation

More... http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/the-victims-of-gates-foundation-generosity/

Bill Gates - Industry

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/bill_gates.html

[Bill Gates has cleverly rescued the vaccine industry through GAVI while gaining kudos for "benevolence", and giving legs to the covert vaccine genocide programme.]

Gates' gimmick of becoming a philantropist repeats the Rockefeller scam almost one to one a century later.
   
But that is not enough. Gates serves as the financier of a whole shipload of ARV missionaries, including ex-U.S. President Clinton who promotes the deadly business with ARV drugs in Africa and other developing nations.
   
One may ask: don't they know the facts that toxic ARVs damage the immune system and actually accelerate immune deficiencies? Of course they do! So what is the motive for their action? It is strikingly simple:
   
If the governments of the developing worlds realize that the ARV genocide is the dirtiest way yet to replace the old colonial dependencies between the rich and poor nations of this planet, they will terminate this business.

They will, like South Africa, choose a health care system independent of the sickening and economically devastating dependency from the pharmaceutical colonialism.
   
The equation is simple: the end of the AIDS business with disease will destroy the entire credibility of the pharmaceutical industry and will terminate the drug investment business worldwide. The collapse of this mulit-billion dollar investment business, in turn, will lead to a major crisis of the whole investment industry. In other words, the "Mother Theresa" PR-stunt of Bill Gates is a desperate, self-serving activity trying to stop this meltdown. If Gates is not successful, and the AIDS genocide by the drug cartel is ended, then the whole paper-wealth of Billy Gates is worthless.
    Got it?
Considering the genocidal consequences of the activities of these organizations, especially in promotion of the ARVs, this entire program "Alliance for a Green Revolution" is nothing else than a fig leaf and another PR-stunt. The "marriage" between Gates and Rockefeller, 10 days after we exposed their business interests in Africa, is a confirmation for the accuracy of our exposure.---Dark cloud over good works of Gates Foundation

[May 2007 Bill Gates has 280.9 million invested in Schering Plough] In January, Schering-Plough agreed to pay $435 million to settle allegations it lied to the government about drug prices and illegally promoted two drugs for the treatment of cancers for which they were not approved.  In 2004, Schering-Plough agreed to pay $346 million to resolve charges it paid a big health insurer a kickback to protect the market for its one-time blockbuster allergy drug, Claritin. ref

Originally funded by Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates through his Seattle-based Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI's partnership of international governments and vaccine manufacturers salvaged lagging sales through an overhauled world vaccination campaign that placed GAVI, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, at the center of the reorganized alliance.....In 1999, with GAVI's international partnership and Bill Gates' billions on the way to rescue the industry, the CDC hired the IOM's Immunizations and Safety Review Committee to examine multiple “vaccine safety challenges”. “A Dragon By The Tail” by Lisa Reagan

"It is also well understood by real skeptics that Gates' medical largesse is "dedicated," only in the sense that it is dedicated to good public relations and to act as a lever for the expansion of Mr. Gates' software empire.   Furthermore, the Gates Foundation scooped up $77million worth of Merck shares in 2002; $37m worth of Pfizer shares and $30m worth of Johnson & Johnson. The previous year, Merck CEO Raymond Gilmartin joined the Microsoft board while Mr Gates helped Merck with AIDS programmes in Botswana. A Gates Foundation representative sits on the board of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations that buys vaccines from some of the pharmaceutical firms in which the foundation now holds shares."---Fintan Dunne, 12 Jan '02
Editor www.SickofDoctors.com

Bill Gates Should Take
The AIDS Vaccine http://www.usasurvival.org/ck72202.shtml

[June 2007 HIV/Africa] Letter to Bill Gates by Hilary Butler
The Microsoft Pyramid Scheme, by Bill Parish. An investment advisor blows the whistle on Microsofts massive income tax fraud, and other financial crimes that make Enron look as clean as a choir boy.
In Microsoft We Trust, by Phil Lemmons. How Microsofts fortune rose as corrupt judges and lawyers dismantled the Sherman Act, and why Microsoft's monopoly convictions will not result in any effective remedies or sanctions.
http://www.konformist.com/1999/ms33.htm

Evidence For The Microsoft WinXP Pro Bugging Device By Mark McCarron
[Media UK, Nov 2002] India rebuffs Bill Gates in Aids row
[Media UK, May 2002] Gates' charity shifts policy
America Life League & Educate Bill Gates http://www.billgateseducate.com
http://pages.prodigy.net/cort/gates.htm   

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation http://www.glf.org/
Children's Vaccine Program http://www.childrensvaccine.org/
Allied Vaccine Group http://www.vaccine.org/ The Vaccine Page http://www.vaccines.com/
International Vaccine Institute http://www.ivi.org/ ($40 million grant from Gates)

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Announces $750 Million Gift to Speed Delivery of Life-Saving Vaccines Gift is largest in Foundation's history

SEATTLE, Washington -- The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced today a gift of $750 million over five years to help ensure that children in developing countries are immunized against major killer diseases in the new millennium. The gift represents the first contribution to a new initiative called the Global Fund for Children's Vaccines. Once it is operational, the fund will purchase vaccines and improve immunization services in the poorest countries in the world. The Global Fund for Children's Vaccines will become operational in the next six to eight months. The fund will work closely with a new international coalition called the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), a partnership of international development and finance organizations, philanthropic groups, the pharmaceutical industry and others. The GAVI partners, which include the World Health Organization, UNICEF, The World Bank, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Children's Vaccine Program http://www.childrensvaccine.org/  will use the money for a sustained global vaccination effort to address the challenges facing vaccine development and delivery in developing countries. An estimated 4 million children die each year of illnesses that can be prevented if children were vaccinated in time. In addition to buying vaccines, the Fund will work on an international level to encourage governments, private enterprise, pharmaceutical companies and other individuals to provide the financial resources needed to make global childhood immunization a reality. Fund resources will also be used to strengthen existing immunization programs where needed. "Melinda and I are committed to ensuring that every child has access to lifesaving vaccines in the next millennium, regardless of where they live," said Bill Gates, co-founder of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. "There are existing vaccines which if distributed properly could save 3 to 4 million children's lives a year. But on the issue of AIDS, of malaria and of other diseases for which we do not yet have effective vaccines, the current drama is how to move ahead and get the research done. The Bill and Melinda Gates initiative is a tremendous boost to this process and we should all celebrate it," said James Wolfensohn, President of the World Bank Group. Officials in the GAVI partner agencies estimate major financial commitments will be needed over the next five years to immunize children in the poorest countries against the major causes of liver cancer, pneumonia, and meningitis. By introducing the new vaccines against these diseases, and by improving the use of traditional vaccines, the Global Fund for Children's Vaccines' goal is to double the number of children saved each year. Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland, Director-General of WHO and current Chairman of the GAVI Board said "GAVI has come into being because we want to embrace a broader partnership. It will be a major boost to addressing the disproportionately large burden of disease suffered by the poor. Special thanks go to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for their generous and enlightened commitment."

At present, many parents and governments in the poorest countries cannot afford to pay for newer, relatively expensive vaccines. Once it is evident that country resources for immunization have been maximized, the Fund will step in to provide resources needed to ensure new vaccine introduction in stronger immunization programs. "Effective distribution of vaccines to the poorest parts of the world is dependent upon partnerships between business, governments, foundations and individuals," said Carol Bellamy, executive director of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). "Today's commitment by Bill and Melinda Gates is a major step forward in ensuring that all children will have equal access to life-saving vaccines. I hope others will follow their leadership and help to make worldwide vaccine distribution a reality."

Foundation officials will provide additional details on the Fund early next year at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. One of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's main goals is to improve access to life-saving vaccines to all children. Foundation officials have been working closely for more than a year with the key international agencies to identify ways to overcome obstacles to effective vaccine delivery in the developing world.

With a gift of $100 million, the Foundation established last year the Bill and Melinda Gates Children's Vaccine Program to decrease the amount of time it takes -- sometimes as long as 10 to 15 years -- for vaccines to become available to children in the developing world. The Children's Vaccine Program is working to eliminate the time lag between initial licensing and global use of new vaccines in developing countries. The Program is currently focusing on vaccines that protect children against respiratory, diarrheal, and liver diseases (Hib, pneumococcus, and hepatitis B). Established in 1999, GAVI seeks to re-energize immunization around the world and to fulfill the right of every child to be protected against vaccine-preventable diseases. To achieve this mission, GAVI seeks to: accelerate introduction of new vaccines; expand the use of all existing cost-effective vaccines; and, accelerate research and development efforts for vaccines and related products relevant to developing countries such as vaccines against HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. GAVI's Board of Directors consists of top officials from its member organizations and is currently chaired by Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, secretary general of the World Health Organization, who will be followed in two years by Ms. Carol Bellamy, executive director of UNICEF.
###
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is dedicated to improving people's lives by sharing advances in health and learning with the global community. Led by Bill Gates' father, William H. Gates, Sr., and Patty Stonesifer, the Seattle-based Foundation has an asset base of approximately $21.8 billion. Preventing deadly diseases among poor children by expanding access to vaccines, and developing vaccines against malaria, HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis, are central priorities. Other major efforts include extending unprecedented opportunities for learning by bringing computers with Internet access to every eligible public library in the U.S. and Canada, and providing scholarships to academically talented minority students with severe financial need through the Gates Millennium Scholars Program (www.gmsp.org). For complete information and grant guidelines, visit www.gatesfoundation.org
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated


VACCINE COMPANIES INVESTIGATED FOR MANSLAUGHTER!!!!
UK: Alert over jab for girls as two die following Gardasil vaccination
Where are the autistic Amish?
Evidence of the elite secretly sterilizing women through vaccines
HPV Vax exposed + Girls aged NINE are offered cancer vax + HPV info by state + FDA knew HPV not cause of cervical cancer
Kids Forced Into MD Court For Vax + Innoculations Work! + NJ to require flu shots for preschoolers
Vaccines really really good + Autism Rises in California
UK: "The super-vaccine that beats ALL types of flu."
Vaccinations. The History of Vaccinations
Vaccines/Experiments on Children, Minorities, Woman and Inmates (1845-Now)
Merck admits injecting cancer + Merck recalls 1.2 million doses of Infant Hib vax
anti smoking vaccination
New "bird flu" hoax to scare the public and to sell thier poisons!
FDA ties pneumonia deaths to infant vaccine
"We have to vaccinate the dog so it won't [bite/bark]."
Flu Vaccine doesn't work, medics admit
gardasill or kill
Yahoo Article - Mercury from vaccines disappears quickly!
Lectured by the Pediatrician about the need for Vaccinations
New flu vaccine may not need needles
'Safe Ebola' created for research
MERCURY, AUTISM AND THE GLOBAL VACCINE AGENDA
flu big pharma flu profit motive???
$10m found for cervical cancer jabs
Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth-Control Drugs?
GlaxoSmithKline testing bird flu virus on humans
New Vaccine Requirements for Arizona Middle School Students
Interesting stats on vaccines, drugs, etc. (link)
Anti-Vaccination/You Tube - Too dangerous??
Clinton Would Boost Autism Funding
Emergency Preparedness and Response Division Free Flu Vaccinations in Colorado
Fox News - Vaccinate or else
Great progress in Slovenia regarding vaccination
AIDS vaccine may increase infection risk
Shot may be inadvertently boosting superbugs
Australian Sweet discovery on flu vaccines
Bush To Veto Ban On Mercury In Vaccines
Cervical Cancer Vaccines Won't Fight Existing HPV InfectionBush To Veto Ban On Mercury In Vaccines



http://www.lewrockwell.com/miller/miller14.html
http://www.mercola.com/2002/mar/30/mercury_vaccine.htm
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
List of Books that are cheap and extremely informational (available at amazon by resellers)

Evidence of Harm

Vaccine A: The Covert Government Experiment That's Killing Our Soldiers--And Why GI's Are Only The First Victims

The Plutonium Files: America's Secret Medical Experiments in the Cold War

Educate before you vaccinate is another good book

http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/dovabeyoued.html

Here is some information about the Anthrax Vaccine the military wants soldiers to take and soldiers' reactions

http://www.gulfwarvets.com/anthrax_lies_vaccines.htm

http://www.gulfwarvets.com/anthraxmaker_warned.htm

Merk drug company vaccines admits injecting cancer viruses

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=327_1195303011


Bayer Exposed: Selling foreign countries AIDS contaminated Medicine

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7d7_1182492879


Common Children's Vaccine Recalled

http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=34&sid=1309140

Mercury Rising

http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=13317

From CDC a list of ingredients in vaccine

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-1.pdf

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf

You should be look some of chemicals online in a google search if you don't where they are.  We are distrustful of the government because programs like the Tuskegee Experiments. 

limitgov:

http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/vaccine_awareness/ingredients.html

Here's a listing of vaccine ingredients. I can't say if this site has updated info - I believe it is taken from the 1997 PDR:

Vaccine Ingredients and Contact Info
Dawn Winkler
Source: 1997 Physicians' Desk Reference
This is a representative, not a comprehensive, list of the various types of vaccines

Acel-Immune
DTaP
Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed

Lederle Laboratories
1-800-934-5556
produced using formaldehyde, thimerosal, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, polysorbate 80, gelatin

Act HIB
Haemophilus Influenzae Type B (Hib) Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate

Connaught Laboratories
1-800-822-2463
produced using ammonium sulfate, formalin, sucrose, thimerosal
medium: semi-synthetic

Attenuvax
Measles Virus Vaccine Live

Merck & Co, Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using neomycin, sorbitol, hydrolized gelatin
medium: chick embryo

DPT
Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed

SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals
1-800-366-8900 ext. 5231
produced using aluminum phosphate, formaldehyde, ammonium sulfate, washed sheep red blood cells, glycerol, sodium chloride, thimerosal
medium: porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein

Energix-B
Hepatitis B

SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals
1-800-633-8900 ext. 5231
produced using aluminum hydroxide, thimerosal
medium: yeast (possibly 5% residual)

Havrix
Hepatitis A

SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals
1-800-633-8900 ext. 5231
produced using formalin, aluminum hydroxide, phenoxyethanol (antifreeze), polysorbate 20, residual MRC5 proteins (from medium)
medium: human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

Biavax
Rubella and Mumps Virus Vaccine Live

Merck & Co, Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using neomycin, sorbitol, hydrolized gelatin
medium: human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

HibTiter
Haemophilus Influenzae Type B (Hib)

Lederle Laboratories
1-800-934-5556
produced using polyribosylribitol, ammonium sulfate, thimerosal
medium: chemically defined, yeast based

Fluvirin
Influenza Virus Vaccine

Medeva Pharmaceuticals
1-888-MEDEVA
(716)274-5300
produced using embryonic fluid (chicken egg), neomycin, polymyxin, thimerosal, betapropiolactone
medium: embryonic fluid (chicken egg)

FluShield
Influenza Virus Vaccine, Trivalent, Types A&B

Wyeth-Ayerst
1-800-934-5556
produced using gentamicin sulfate, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, tri(n)butylphosphate, thimerosal
medium: chick embryos

IPOL
Inactivated Polio Vaccine

Connaught Laboratories
1-800-822-2463
produced using 3 types of polio virus, formaldehyde, phenoxyethanol (antifreeze), neomycin, streptomycin, polymyxin B
medium: VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells

MMR
Measles Mumps Rubella Live Virus Vaccine

Merck & Co., Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using sorbitol, neomycin, hydrolyzed gelatin
mediums: M&M - chick embryo
              Rubella - human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

M-R-Vax
Measles and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live

Merck & Co., Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using neomycin, sorbitol, hydrolyzed gelatin
mediums: M - chick embryo
                R - human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

Menomune
Meningococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine

Connaught Laboratories
1-800-822-2463
produced using thimerosal, lactose
medium: freeze dried polysaccharride antigens from Neisseria Meningitidis

Meruvax II
Rubella Virus Vaccine Live

Merck & Co., Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using neomycin, sorbitol, hydrolyzed gelatin
medium: human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

Mumpsvax
Mumps Virus Vaccine Live

Merck & Co., Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using neomycin, sorbitol, hydrolyzed gelatin
medium: human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

Orimune
Poliovirus Vaccine Live Oral Trivalent

Lederle Laboratories
1-800-934-5556
produced using 3 types of attenuated polioviruses, streptomycin, neomycin, calf serum, sorbitol
medium: monkey kidney cell culture

Pneumovax
Pneumococcal Vaccine Polyvalent

Merck & Co., Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using phenol and capsular polysaccharides from the 23 most prevalent pneumococcal types

Prevnar
Pneumococcal 7-valent Conjugate Vaccine

Lederle Laboratories
1-800-934-5556
produced using Diphtheria CRM197 Protein, capsular antigens of Sreptococcus pneumoniae serotypes 4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F individually conjugated to Diphtheria CRM197 Protein, soy peptone broth, ammonium sulfate, aluminum phosphate
medium: yeast extract based

Imovax
Rabies Vaccine Adsorbed

Connaught Laboratories
1-800-822-2463
produced using human albumin, neomycin sulfate, phenol red indicator
medium: human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

Rabies Vaccine Adsorbed
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals
1-800-366-8900 ext. 5231
produced using betapropiolactone, aluminum phosphate, sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate (thimerosal), phenol red
medium: fetal rhesus monkey lung cells

Recombivax
Hepatitis B Vaccine Recombinant

Merck & Co., Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using thimerosal, aluminum hydroxide
medium: yeast (residual < 1% yeast protein)

RotaShield
Rotavirus Vaccine, Live, Oral, Tetravalent

Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories
1-800-934-5556
produced using 1 rhesus monkey rotavirus, 3 rhesus-human reassortant viruses, sucrose, monosodium glutamate (MSG), potassium monophosphate, potassium diphosphate, fetal bovine serum, neomycin sulfate, amphotericin B
medium: fetal rhesus diploid cell line

Varivax
Varicella Virus Vaccine Live

Merck & Co., Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using sucrose, phosphate, monosodium glutamate, processed gelatin
medium: human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)

According to IVAC, (Illinois Vaccine Awareness Coalition 708-848-0116) all vaccines contain monosodium glutamate even if not listed in product insert. According to numerous sources, all vaccines contain thimerosal (mercury). Manufacturers have declared that it is not possible to produce any vaccine without these two components.

Chemical Profiles and Definitions
Sources: EDF (Environmental Defense Fund) & MME (Mosby's Medical Encyclopdia)

Ammonium Sulfate: EDF Suspected - gastrointestinal or liver toxicant
                                neurotoxicant
                                respiratory toxicant

Amphotericin B: MME definintion - "a drug used to treat fungus infections. Known allergy to this drug prohibits use. Side effects include blood clots, blood defects, kidney problems, nausea and fever. When used on the skin, allergic reactions can occur."

Aluminum: EDF Suspected - cardiovascular or blood toxicant neurotoxicant respiratory toxicant
More hazardous than most chemicals in 2 out of 6 ranking systems
On at least 2 federal regulatory lists

Beta-Propiolactone: EDF Recognized - carcinogen
                               EDF Suspected - gastrointestinal or liver toxicant
                                respiratory toxicant
                               skin or sense organ toxicant
                               More hazardous than most chemicals in 3 out of 3 ranking systems
                               On at least 5 federal regulatory lists
                               Ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%)to humans

Formaldehyde: EDF Recognized - carcinogen
                       Suspected - gastrointestinal or liver toxicant
                       immunotoxicant
                       neurotoxicant
                       reproductive toxicant
                       respiratory toxicant
                       skin or sense organ toxicant
                       More hazardous than most chemicals in 5 out of 12 ranking systems
                       On at least 8 federal regulatory lists
                       Ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%) to ecosystems and human health

Gentamicin Sulfate: an antibiotic

Hydrolyzed Gelatin: obtained from selected pieces of calf and cattle skins, de-mineralized cattle bones (ossein) and porkskin

Monosodium Glutamate: Normally used as a flavor enhancer in a variety of foods, however, due to concerns expressed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, MSG was removed from all products intended for use in infants under the age of one. Injections of glutamate into laboratory animals have resulted in damage to nerve cells in the brain.

Neomycin: an antibiotic

Phenol : EDF Suspected - cardiovascular or blood toxicant aka Carbolic Acid
           developmental toxicant
           gastrointestinal or liver toxicant
           kidney toxicant
           neurotoxicant
           respiratory toxicant
           skin or sense organ toxicant
           More hazardous than most chemicals in 3 out of 10 ranking systems
           On at least 8 federal regulatory lists

Phenoxyethanol: EDF Suspected - developmental toxicant aka Antifreeze
                         reproductive toxicant
                         Less hazardous than most chemicals in 3 ranking systems

Polyribosylribitol: a component of the Hib bacterium

Polymyxin: an antibiotic

Polysorbate: EDF Suspected - skin or sense organ toxicant

Sorbitol: EDF Suspected - gastrointestinal or liver toxicant
               Less hazardous than most chemicals in 1 ranking system

Streptomycin: an antibiotic

Sucrose: refined sugar

Thimerosal: EDF Recognized - development toxicant
                   Suspected - skin or sense organ toxicant

Tri(n)butylphosphate: EDF Suspected - kidney toxicant
                                 neurotoxicant
                                 More hazardous than most chemicals in 2 out of 3 ranking systems
                                 On at least 1 federal regulatory list

   
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t
Doomsday Seed Vault in the Arctic
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529

December 4, 2007
By F. William Engdahl

In 2006 when most people in such a situation might think of retiring to a quiet Pacific island, Bill Gates decided to devote his energies to his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest ‘transparent’ private foundation as it says, with a whopping $34.6 billion endowment and a legal necessity to spend $1.5 billion a year on charitable projects around the world to maintain its tax free charitable status. A gift from friend and business associate, mega-investor Warren Buffett in 2006, of some $30 billion worth of shares in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway put the Gates’ foundation into the league where it spends almost the amount of the entire annual budget of the United Nations’ World Health Organization.

So when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to invest some $30 million of their hard earned money in a project, it is worth looking at.

No project is more interesting at the moment than a curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a barren piece of rock claimed by Norway and ceded in 1925 by international treaty.

On this God-forsaken island Bill Gates is investing tens of his millions along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among others, in what is called the ‘doomsday seed bank.’ Officially the project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group.


The seed bank is being built inside a mountain on Spitsbergen Island near the small village of Longyearbyen. It’s almost ready for ‘business’ according to their releases. The bank will have dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter thick. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future,’ according to the Norwegian government. Seeds will be specially wrapped to exclude moisture. There will be no full-time staff, but the vault's relative inaccessibility will facilitate monitoring any possible human activity.

Did we miss something here? Their press release stated, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future.’ What future do the seed bank’s sponsors foresee, that would threaten the global availability of current seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed banks around the world?

Anytime Bill Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto and Syngenta get together on a common project, it’s worth digging a bit deeper behind the rocks on Spitsbergen. When we do we find some fascinating things.

The first notable point is who is sponsoring the doomsday seed vault. Here joining the Norwegians are, as noted, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; the US agribusiness giant DuPont/Pioneer Hi-Bred, one of the world’s largest owners of patented genetically-modified (GMO) plant seeds and related agrichemicals; Syngenta, the Swiss-based major GMO seed and agrichemicals company through its Syngenta Foundation; the Rockefeller Foundation, the private group who created the “gene revolution with over $100 million of seed money since the 1970’s; CGIAR, the global network created by the Rockefeller Foundation to promote its ideal of genetic purity through agriculture change.



CGIAR and ‘The Project’

As I detailled in the book, Seeds of Destruction, in 1960 the Rockefeller Foundation, John D. Rockefeller III’s Agriculture Development Council and the Ford Foundation joined forces to create the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in Los Baños, the Philippines.1 By 1971, the Rockefeller Foundation’s IRRI, along with their Mexico-based International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center and two other Rockefeller and Ford Foundation-created international research centers, the IITA for tropical agriculture, Nigeria, and IRRI for rice, Philippines, combined to form a global Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research (CGIAR).


http://www.cgiar.org/index.html


CGIAR was shaped at a series of private conferences held at the Rockefeller Foundation’s conference center in Bellagio, Italy. Key participants at the Bellagio talks were the Rockefeller Foundation’s George Harrar, Ford Foundation’s Forrest Hill, Robert McNamara of the World Bank and Maurice Strong, the Rockefeller family’s international environmental organizer, who, as a Rockefeller Foundation Trustee, organized the UN Earth Summit in Stockholm in 1972. It was part of the foundation’s decades long focus to turn science to the service of eugenics, a hideous version of racial purity, what has been called The Project.

To ensure maximum impact, CGIAR drew in the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization, the UN Development Program and the World Bank. Thus, through a carefully-planned leverage of its initial funds, the Rockefeller Foundation by the beginning of the 1970’s was in a position to shape global agriculture policy. And shape it did.

Financed by generous Rockefeller and Ford Foundation study grants, CGIAR saw to it that leading Third World agriculture scientists and agronomists were brought to the US to ‘master’ the concepts of modern agribusiness production, in order to carry it back to their homeland. In the process they created an invaluable network of influence for US agribusiness promotion in those countries, most especially promotion of the GMO ‘Gene Revolution’ in developing countries, all in the name of science and efficient, free market agriculture.

Genetically engineering a master race?

Now the Svalbard Seed Bank begins to become interesting. But it gets better. ‘The Project’ I referred to is the project of the Rockefeller Foundation and powerful financial interests since the 1920’s to use eugenics, later renamed genetics, to justify creation of a genetically-engineered Master Race. Hitler and the Nazis called it the Ayran Master Race.

The eugenics of Hitler were financed to a major extent by the same Rockefeller Foundation which today is building a doomsday seed vault to preserve samples of every seed on our planet. Now this is getting really intriguing. The same Rockefeller Foundation created the pseudo-science discipline of molecular biology in their relentless pursuit of reducing human life down to the ‘defining gene sequence’ which, they hoped, could then be modified in order to change human traits at will. Hitler’s eugenics scientists, many of whom were quietly brought to the United States after the War to continue their biological eugenics research, laid much of the groundwork of genetic engineering of various life forms, much of it supported openly until well into the Third Reich by Rockefeller Foundation generous grants.2

The same Rockefeller Foundation created the so-called Green Revolution, out of a trip to Mexico in 1946 by Nelson Rockefeller and former New Deal Secretary of Agriculture and founder of the Pioneer Hi-Bred Seed Company, Henry Wallace.

The Green Revolution purported to solve the world hunger problem to a major degree in Mexico, India and other select countries where Rockefeller worked. Rockefeller Foundation agronomist, Norman Borlaug, won a Nobel Peace Prize for his work, hardly something to boast about with the likes of Henry Kissinger sharing the same.

In reality, as it years later emerged, the Green Revolution was a brilliant Rockefeller family scheme to develop a globalized agribusiness which they then could monopolize just as they had done in the world oil industry beginning a half century before. As Henry Kissinger declared in the 1970’s, ‘If you control the oil you control the country; if you control food, you control the population.’

Agribusiness and the Rockefeller Green Revolution went hand-in-hand. They were part of a grand strategy which included Rockefeller Foundation financing of research for the development of genetic engineering of plants and animals a few years later.

John H. Davis had been Assistant Agriculture Secretary under President Dwight Eisenhower in the early 1950’s. He left Washington in 1955 and went to the Harvard Graduate School of Business, an unusual place for an agriculture expert in those days. He had a clear strategy. In 1956, Davis wrote an article in the Harvard Business Review in which he declared that “the only way to solve the so-called farm problem once and for all, and avoid cumbersome government programs, is to progress from agriculture to agribusiness.” He knew precisely what he had in mind, though few others had a clue back then--- a revolution in agriculture production that would concentrate control of the food chain in corporate multinational hands, away from the traditional family farmer.3

A crucial aspect driving the interest of the Rockefeller Foundation and US agribusiness companies was the fact that the Green Revolution was based on proliferation of new hybrid seeds in developing markets. One vital aspect of hybrid seeds was their lack of reproductive capacity. Hybrids had a built in protection against multiplication. Unlike normal open pollinated species whose seed gave yields similar to its parents, the yield of the seed borne by hybrid plants was significantly lower than that of the first generation.


The ICARDA genebank located in Aleppo, Syria, holds approximately 25 % of the CGIAR's total germplasm collections.

That declining yield characteristic of hybrids meant farmers must normally buy seed every year in order to obtain high yields. Moreover, the lower yield of the second generation eliminated the trade in seed that was often done by seed producers without the breeder’s authorization. It prevented the redistribution of the commercial crop seed by middlemen. If the large multinational seed

companies were able to control the parental seed lines in house, no competitor or farmer would be able to produce the hybrid. The global concentration of hybrid seed patents into a handful of giant seed companies, led by DuPont’s Pioneer Hi-Bred and Monsanto’s Dekalb laid the ground for the later GMO seed revolution.4

In effect, the introduction of modern American agricultural technology, chemical fertilizers and commercial hybrid seeds all made local farmers in developing countries, particularly the larger more established ones, dependent on foreign, mostly US agribusiness and petro-chemical company inputs. It was a first step in what was to be a decades-long, carefully planned process.

Under the Green Revolution Agribusiness was making major inroads into markets which were previously of limited access to US exporters. The trend was later dubbed “market-oriented agriculture.” In reality it was agribusiness-controlled agriculture.

Through the Green Revolution, the Rockefeller Foundation and later Ford Foundation worked hand-in-hand shaping and supporting the foreign policy goals of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and of the CIA.

One major effect of the Green Revolution was to depopulate the countryside of peasants who were forced to flee into shantytown slums around the cities in desperate search for work. That was no accident; it was part of the plan to create cheap labor pools for forthcoming US multinational manufactures, the ‘globalization’ of recent years.

When the self-promotion around the Green Revolution died down, the results were quite different from what had been promised. Problems had arisen from indiscriminate use of the new chemical pesticides, often with serious health consequences. The mono-culture cultivation of new hybrid seed varieties decreased soil fertility and yields over time. The first results were impressive: double or even triple yields for some crops such as wheat and later corn in Mexico. That soon faded.

The Green Revolution was typically accompanied by large irrigation projects which often included World Bank loans to construct huge new dams, and flood previously settled areas and fertile farmland in the process. Also, super-wheat produced greater yields by saturating the soil with huge amounts of fertilizer per acre, the fertilizer being the product of nitrates and petroleum, commodities controlled by the Rockefeller-dominated Seven Sisters major oil companies.

Huge quantities of herbicides and pesticides were also used, creating additional markets for the oil and chemical giants. As one analyst put it, in effect, the Green Revolution was merely a chemical revolution. At no point could developing nations pay for the huge amounts of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. They would get the credit courtesy of the World Bank and special loans by Chase Bank and other large New York banks, backed by US Government guarantees.

Applied in a large number of developing countries, those loans went mostly to the large landowners. For the smaller peasants the situation worked differently. Small peasant farmers could not afford the chemical and other modern inputs and had to borrow money.

Initially various government programs tried to provide some loans to farmers so that they could purchase seeds and fertilizers. Farmers who could not participate in this kind of program had to borrow from the private sector. Because of the exorbitant interest rates for informal loans, many small farmers did not even get the benefits of the initial higher yields. After harvest, they had to sell most if not all of their produce to pay off loans and interest. They became dependent on money-lenders and traders and often lost their land. Even with soft loans from government agencies, growing subsistence crops gave way to the production of cash crops.5

Since decades the same interests including the Rockefeller Foundation which backed the initial Green Revolution, have worked to promote a second ‘Gene Revolution’ as Rockefeller Foundation President Gordon Conway termed it several years ago, the spread of industrial agriculture and commercial inputs including GMO patented seeds.

Gates, Rockefeller and a Green Revolution in Africa

With the true background of the 1950’s Rockefeller Foundation Green Revolution clear in mind, it becomes especially curious that the same Rockefeller Foundation along with the Gates Foundation which are now investing millions of dollars in preserving every seed against a possible “doomsday” scenario are also investing millions in a project called The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa.

AGRA, as it calls itself, is an alliance again with the same Rockefeller Foundation which created the “Gene Revolution.” A look at the AGRA Board of Directors confirms this.

It includes none other than former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan as chairman. In his acceptance speech in a World Economic Forum event in Cape Town South Africa in June 2007, Kofi Annan stated, ‘I accept this challenge with gratitude to the Rockefeller Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and all others who support our African campaign.’

In addition the AGRA board numbers a South African, Strive Masiyiwa who is a Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation. It includes Sylvia M. Mathews of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Mamphela Ramphele, former Managing Director of the World Bank (2000 – 2006); Rajiv J. Shah of the Gates Foundation; Nadya K. Shmavonian of the Rockefeller Foundation; Roy Steiner of the Gates Foundation. In addition, an Alliance for AGRA includes Gary Toenniessen the Managing Director of the Rockefeller Foundation and Akinwumi Adesina, Associate Director, Rockefeller Foundation.

To fill out the lineup, the Programmes for AGRA includes Peter Matlon, Managing Director, Rockefeller Foundation; Joseph De Vries, Director of the Programme for Africa’s Seed Systems and Associate Director, Rockefeller foundation; Akinwumi Adesina, Associate Director, Rockefeller Foundation. Like the old failed Green Revolution in India and Mexico, the new Africa Green Revolution is clearly a high priority of the Rockefeller Foundation.

While to date they are keeping a low profile, Monsanto and the major GMO agribusiness giants are believed at the heart of using Kofi Annan’s AGRA to spread their patented GMO seeds across Africa under the deceptive label, ‘bio-technology,’ the new euphemism for genetically engineered patented seeds. To date South Africa is the only African country permitting legal planting of GMO crops. In 2003 Burkina Faso authorized GMO trials. In 2005 Kofi Annan’s Ghana drafted bio-safety legislation and key officials expressed their intentions to pursue research into GMO crops.

Africa is the next target in the US-government campaign to spread GMO worldwide. Its rich soils make it an ideal candidate. Not surprisingly many African governments suspect the worst from the GMO sponsors as a multitude of genetic engineering and biosafety projects have been initiated in Africa, with the aim of introducing GMOs into Africa’s agricultural systems. These include sponsorships offered by the US government to train African scientists in genetic engineering in the US, biosafety projects funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the World Bank; GMO research involving African indigenous food crops.

The Rockefeller Foundation has been working for years to promote, largely without success, projects to introduce GMOs into the fields of Africa. They have backed research that supports the applicability of GMO cotton in the Makhathini Flats in South Africa.

Monsanto, who has a strong foothold in South Africa’s seed industry, both GMO and hybrid, has conceived of an ingenious smallholders’ programme known as the ‘Seeds of Hope’ Campaign, which is introducing a green revolution package to small scale poor farmers, followed, of course, by Monsanto’s patented GMO seeds. 6

Syngenta AG of Switzerland, one of the ‘Four Horsemen of the GMO Apocalypse’ is pouring millions of dollars into a new greenhouse facility in Nairobi, to develop GMO insect resistant maize. Syngenta is a part of CGIAR as well.7
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Mercury, Immunizations and the Global Vaccine Agenda
http://www.akha.org/content/vaccinations/autismtetanus.pdf
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Scootle

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,255
CNN video of Bill Gates' f**k you to the millions of parents of vaccine damaged children:

Bill Gates: Vaccine-autism link 'an absolute lie'
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/02/03/gupta.gates.vaccines.world.health/
The truth will set you free
From global tyranny
Wake up American slobs
9/11 was an inside job
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OntBg2qwk_M&fmt=35

Century of Manipulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mujq-C1UAw0

... Here's Tom with the weather!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CCIcjIngLA

Offline Scootle

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,255
The truth will set you free
From global tyranny
Wake up American slobs
9/11 was an inside job
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OntBg2qwk_M&fmt=35

Century of Manipulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mujq-C1UAw0

... Here's Tom with the weather!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CCIcjIngLA

Offline Scootle

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,255
The truth will set you free
From global tyranny
Wake up American slobs
9/11 was an inside job
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OntBg2qwk_M&fmt=35

Century of Manipulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mujq-C1UAw0

... Here's Tom with the weather!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CCIcjIngLA

Offline kita

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,333
  • Action is the ONLY answer!


Great Info as usual.Bill Gates,needs indicted for crimes against humanity,along with all the other major globalists.
ONLY answer to God,for God is Good, honest and just.God is the one,we'll have to answer to one day for our actions in the here and now -DO NOT DOUBT IT!

Offline Scootle

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,255
Look at the demonic smirk on his face as he parrots the lies about wakefield and says that vaccines have been proven to be safe and that vaccine skeptics kill children ... he clearly knows he's lying ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFlhBYwLbf8
The truth will set you free
From global tyranny
Wake up American slobs
9/11 was an inside job
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OntBg2qwk_M&fmt=35

Century of Manipulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mujq-C1UAw0

... Here's Tom with the weather!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CCIcjIngLA

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,758
    • The Great Deception
http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/mon-january-31-2011-bill-gates
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/26/bill-gates-on-daily-show_n_436627.html

Gates made an appearance on Jon Stewart show 1-31-11 where I heard him say that they were having trouble vaccinating kids in 4 countries where polio is still rampant, and he actually said "they were afraid of sterility". Of course, he then proceeds to say their fears are unfounded. I couldn't believe he admitted it, however, in a disguised way!

The four countries:

Pakistan
Afghanistan
India
Nigeria

http://www.mynorthwest.com/?nid=11&sid=419337
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

The Great Deception - Forum/Library - My Research
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showforum=110

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/mon-january-31-2011-bill-gates
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/26/bill-gates-on-daily-show_n_436627.html

Gates made an appearance on Jon Stewart show 1-31-11 where I heard him say that they were having trouble vaccinating kids in 4 countries where polio is still rampant, and he actually said "they were afraid of sterility". Of course, he then proceeds to say their fears are unfounded. I couldn't believe he admitted it, however, in a disguised way!

The four countries:

Pakistan
Afghanistan
India
Nigeria

http://www.mynorthwest.com/?nid=11&sid=419337

Nothing to see, move along.

Just the countries with the highest fertility and population rates in the world.

derrrrrrrr
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately


Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,758
    • The Great Deception
Bill Gates: Vaccine-autism link 'an absolute lie'
http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/02/03/gupta.gates.vaccines.world.health/
http://cnn.com/video/?/video/health/2011/02/04/gupta.gates.vaccines.cnn

Look at this graphic:
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2011/02/billgatesvaccinesbqr.jpg


He is now floating the mantra "2011 The Year of the Vaccine". Just how many more is he going to roll out this year?   >:(




Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

The Great Deception - Forum/Library - My Research
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showforum=110

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,939
Gates Foundation Ties with Monsanto under Fire from Activists
1st September 2010
http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/allposts/gates-foundation-ties-with-monsanto-under-fire-from-activists

… The foundation bought 500,000 shares of [Monsanto] stock between April and June; on Friday, the total value was $27.6 million. … Several foundation employees have ties to the company, including some in leadership positions. A number of the projects it has funded in Africa also work with the company. …
By Maureen O’Hagan, Kristi Heim
Seattle Times | August 28, 2010

For two years, local activists on a shoestring budget have been trying to document connections between the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Monsanto, the company vilified by some for its heavy involvement in genetic engineering of crops.

Try as they might, their work got little attention.

That all changed with the news, reported by The Wall Street Journal last week, that Monsanto was among the foundation’s most recent portfolio investments. A filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission says the foundation bought 500,000 shares of the stock between April and June; on Friday, the total value was $27.6 million.

The Gates Foundation doesn’t comment on specific investments, a spokeswoman said.

While the Monsanto investment is a tiny fraction of the foundation’s $33 billion endowment, it loomed large among those involved in food issues. The news ricocheted around activist circles and has given the Seattle-based Community Alliance for Global Justice (CAGJ) a national platform.

Its AGRA Watch campaign has been quietly compiling Monsanto/foundation connections for two years. Several foundation employees have ties to the company, including some in leadership positions. A number of the projects it has funded in Africa also work with the company.

As news of the investment broke, national activist organizations started reaching out to the alliance, said Heather Day, CAGJ’s director. The group will start “organizing on a national scale” next week with the help of the larger groups.


(Full article)

==============================

Bill Gates: Use Vaccines to Lower Population, Solve AGW
http://www.drudge.com/archive/130568/bill-gates-use-vaccines-lower

Bill Gates told a recent TED conference that vaccines are needed to reduce world population in order to solve global warming and lower CO2 emissions. Stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said,

"If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services (abortion),
we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent."


The formula CO2 = P x S x E x C
(P=Population; S=Services Per Person; E=Energy Per Service; C=CO2 per unit of energy).

How an improvement in health care and vaccines save lives and lead to a lowering in global population is an oxymoron, unless Gates is referring to those that sterilize people, which is the same method advocated in White House science advisor John P. Holdren's 1977 textbook Ecoscience.


And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,939
The 'replacement' for DDT is vaccines.
No profit motive, no eugenics motive here of course.


Bill Gates' $10 Billon Vaccine Scam
http://rense.com/general89/gates.htm
By Thomas C. Mountain
Online Journal
2-26-10

 
ASMARA, Eritrea -- The "richest man in the world," Microsoft's Bill Gates, recently announced that he was making a $10 billion donation towards finding vaccines to prevent some of the world's worst diseases.
 
Malaria is the number one killer in Africa. From what I'm hearing about $1 billion of Bill Gates donation/tax write-off is for research to find a vaccine to prevent malaria.
 
The African country of Eritrea, where I live, has reduced malaria mortality by 85 percent in the last seven years. How? By using basic public health methods. By distributing pesticide treated mosquito nets and organizing the pesticide retreatment every three months of mosquito nets. By habitat eradication. And by community medical clinics for immediate treatment.
 
Malaria is a parasite-based disease noted for its variety and quick development of resistance to medication. Any "vaccine," if even a billion dollars is able to produce such, would have a limited lifetime and new, patented medications would have to be bought by Africa's poor every few years.
 
So "donating" a billion dollars to develop a malaria "vaccine" could turn into tens of billions of dollars in drug sales in Africa alone, and Bill Gates, through his drug company investments, will quietly pocket more African blood money.
 
All the while a very successful malaria mortality reduction program is operating, effectively, safely and affordably, in Eritrea.
 
Why isn't this being publicized internationally? Could it be that such a program is not going to put billions into the pockets of the drug lords of Western finance?
 
Bill Gates and other assorted financial terrorists through their control of the Western media and "aid" organizations are suppressing implementation of a successful malaria mortality program while investing in a malaria drug addiction for Africa's people.
 
These financial terrorists are perfectly willing to see millions die in Africa while they search for their next highly profitable "wonder drug" to cure malaria, all the while deliberately ignoring, worse, engineering a white out/cover up of what could prevent millions of deaths, let alone uncounted suffering.
 
And HIV/AIDS, Africa's N0.2 killer? Bill Gates is said to be providing over a billion dollars for research into developing an AIDS vaccine. AIDS, a virus based disease, has already shown to have varieties and to have developed resistance to the medications developed to treat it. Like the flu vaccine, a new AIDS vaccine would most likely have to be developed every few years to combat the latest strain of the AIDS virus; another gold mine of new, patented medications for sale to Africa's sick.
 
Eritrea has reduced HIV/AIDS infection rates by 40 percent, according to Physicians for Peace, and is the only country in Africa to reduce HIV/AIDS. How? By using public health education promoting condom use everywhere in the country. Over a billion for a "vaccine" that may never work while an effective program that can reduce HIV/AIDS infection by 40 percent, safely and affordably can be immediately implemented?
 
Remember, Western billionaires didn't get that way by being out to really help anyone. Millions die in Africa as the Western drug lords and their financial terrorist stockholders reap their billions in blood money. All the while real heroes in the Eritrean public health service struggle to save people's lives.
 
So don't believe that Bill Gates is up to any good when he donates $10 billion to vaccine research, just the opposite. And don't forget that as far at the USA is concerned in Africa, no good deed goes unpunished, and, once again, Eritrea is subject to UN Security Council sanctions.
 
Stay tuned to Online Journal for more news from Africa's Horn that the so called free press in the west refuses to cover.
 
Thomas C. Mountain was, in a former life, an educator, activist and alternative medicine practitioner in the USA.
Email thomascmountain at yahoo.com.

And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,939
Bill Gates releases mosquitoes into audience
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29022220

"Bill Gates just released mosquitos into the audience at TED and said, 'Not only poor people should experience this.'"
That was the post by Facebook's Senior Platform Manager Dave Morin on social networking site Twitter.
The event took place at the TED2009 (Technology, Entertainment and Design) conference on Wednesday in Long Beach, Calif., where the Microsoft chairman was delivering a presentation about malaria education and eradication. Malaria is transmitted from person to person via mosquito bites.
The mosquito incident was confirmed by the media office of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which also noted that the insects released were not carrying malaria. (continued at source link).

And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,939


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03MZG9vK0W8&feature=player_embedded#!

"Is spending a million dollars on that last three months of life for that patient -- would it be better not to lay off those ten teachers - and to make that trade-off in medical costs? But that's what's called the 'death panel', ah, and you're not supposed to have that discussion."
- Bill Gates
Aspen Conference 2010


While they were discussing the health care legislation, they said that wacky conspiracy theorists were making up lies about 'death panels'. Then, in August, we find Bill Gates talking about death panels. They exist, we knew they existed, it's part of depopulation, and one of Bill's missions.


The guy is a narcissistic psychopath.
He believes in euthanizing pesky older chronically ill patients, he believes in jabbing everyone with vaccines delivered by mosquitoes, he thinks you should not procreate (and as a father of THREE, he believes his own sperm is sacred).
He sees delivery of vaccines as a tool to fight 'overpopulation'.

Any questions?

And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40