PrisonPlanet Forum
June 19, 2013, 04:24:38 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Holy Shit...You still want to deny Senator Rand Paul's patriotism?  (Read 2430 times)
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« on: January 27, 2011, 05:24:02 PM »

Time to end foreign aid to Israel: ‘We just can’t do it anymore,’ Sen. Paul warns
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/time-foreign-aid-israel-we-anymore-sen-paul-warns/
By Stephen C. Webster
Thursday, January 27th, 2011 -- 10:17 am


One of the Senate's newest members has settled upon an idea to reduce American debt that's likely to come off as highly controversial in the halls of power: ending all foreign aid, including the tens of billions dedicated to Israel.

Israel has been, by far, the largest recipient of US foreign aid anywhere in the world. Since the inception of Israel's close diplomatic relationship with the US all the way through 2008, Americans gave Israel over $103 billion, according to the American Educational Trust.

President Barack Obama in late 2009 approved an additional $2.77 billion for Israeli foreign aid in 2010, and another $30 billion over the next decade.

That's got to stop, according to Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who told CNN host Wolf Blitzer recently that with such a crushing economic picture in the US, "we just can't do it anymore."

"What I'm concerned about," Paul said, is that "if we do nothing -- if we coast along as we've been coasting -- entitlements and interest will consume the whole debt within a decade; will consume the whole budget. There will be nothing left for anything else. My fear is we could have a precipitous calamity where nobody gets any checks from government, so security fails, Medicare fails, unless we start making the difficult decisions now.

"I'm gonna propose a solution before we have a calamity," he said.

In a recent proposal by Paul, a total of $500 billion would be slashed from the budget within a year, undercutting food stamps, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the National Endowment for the Arts and other programs that many hold dear.

It would also take five percent from the defense budget, chopping $16 billion out of funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

President Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates recently announced two significant budget cuts at the Defense Department, starting with a $78 billion cut in spending over the next five years. The figure nearly topped the first-year maximum cuts proposed by House Republicans during the 2010 mid-term elections.

But even that was a mere "pin-prick" to a behemoth military-industrial complex that must drastically shrink for the good of the republic, a former Reagan administration budget director recently told Raw Story.

"It amounts to a failed opportunity to recognize that we are now at a historical inflection point at which the time has arrived for a classic post-war demobilization of the entire military establishment," David Stockman said in an exclusive interview.

He warned that without massive cuts to the defense budget, reducing elective spending a bit here and a bit there would be "too little, too late."

Short of that, he suggested, the United States had "reached the point of no return" with its artificial creation of wealth, and would eventually face a sharp economic decline.

Sen. Paul has been a leading conservative advocate of defense cuts, but his position was largely unsupported by fellow Republicans.

A Democrat-created commission dedicated to studying defense cuts recommended last year that up to $1 trillion be removed from the military's budget. Recommendations from the Sustainable Defense Task Force, formed by Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) and supported by Sen. Paul's father, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), were seen as largely unworkable, with Republicans standing nearly in unanimous opposition to cutting America's defense budget.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), the highest ranking Jewish member of Congress, played down any talk of cutting foreign aid payments to Israel.

"I've always said that any aid to foreign countries should pass the test of whether it helps support the security of the United States," he recently told AFP.

Cantor added that it was "very clear" Israel was waging "the same war against radical Islam that we are in," and therefore passed his test.

Cantor came under heavy criticism in November when, as House Minority Whip, he reached out to Israel's prime minister and promised that Republicans would "serve as a check on the [Obama] administration" when talks turned to Israeli policy. When former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) traveled to Syria in 2007, Cantor suggested she'd committed a felony by violating the Logan Act, which prohibits conducting unauthorized diplomacy with a foreign country.

This video is from CNN, broadcast Jan. 26, 2010.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
worcesteradam
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3,954


Knight Commander of the Old Republic


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2011, 05:32:55 PM »

very brave considering his neocon vote

they literally sit at home masturbating over Israel
Logged

All the earthly riches, all the lands and all the seas - all this shall be one common property of the whole of humanity  --  Trotsky
chris jones
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,659


« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2011, 09:12:30 AM »


 Its about time this subject was hit on.....yes, cut AID to Israel, BUMPED.

After researching Rands veiws on foriegn policy I'm getting more and more confused.
It could be i have a habit of interweaving his dad's stand with Rands!

Does anyone have an update as to Rands veiws on the wars, both Iraq and Afghanistan..
I have found he is negative on Iraq, and agrees with the Afghansitan invasion, does he stand by this.

He recently stated, nukes on the table with regards to Iran. Though this could be interpreted in several ways. I am hoping he expands on this remark.

generally I can resaerch and get answers,BUT  no luck this time.......

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!