Dimitri Khalezov's disinfo push "no planes" absurdity and cultish following

[MediaGiant]

For all those seeking the truth about nuclear weapons being used on 9/11 and finding only obstructionists, I present the following evidence.

http://www.tranquilitylane.com/images/Police Guns with Melted Concrete found in the ruins of the WTC.jpg

The text reads:

The U.S. Customs House stored a large arsenal of firearms at its Six World Trade Center office. During recovery efforts, several handguns were found at Ground Zero, including these two cylindrical gun-casing remains and a revolver embedded in concrete. Fire temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava around anything in its path.

And this was in building 6!

Thermate was not the only weapon used on 9/11.

Brought to you by the 9/11 Nukers!

http://intellihub.com/2012/06/28/35-reasons-micro-nukes-were-utilized-to-demolish-the-wtc-on-911/

[JT Coyoté]

"NO PLANES - NO BULLETS - NO BOMBS - NO POLICE STATE! GOVERNMENT IS GOD!"

WORSHIP NOW... NOW!!!

Oldyoti

"Ideas are more powerful than guns.
We would not let our enemies have guns,
why should we let them have ideas."
~Joseph Stalin

[worcesteradam]

For all those seeking the truth about nuclear weapons being used on 9/11 and finding only obstructionists, I present the following evidence.

http://www.tranquilitylane.com/images/Police Guns with Melted Concrete found in the ruins of the WTC.jpg

The text reads:

The U.S. Customs House stored a large arsenal of firearms at its Six World Trade Center office. During recovery efforts, several handguns were found at Ground Zero, including these two cylindrical gun-casing remains and a revolver embedded in concrete. Fire temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava around anything in its path.

Great photo

[MediaGiant]

Thanks worcesteradam, this fits with the LIDAR evidence of a 40-60 foot crater underneath WTC6.

http://www.tranquilitylane.com/images/lidar_sep19.gif

http://www.tranquilitylane.com/images/lidar_sep19.jpg

[John_Back_From_The_Club_O]

I have always felt multiple weapons (i.e. 'directional' nukes) and basic demolitions were used on 911 in NY.   At the World Trade Center the city of NY banned the use of geiger counters and even threaten people with arrest if they were caught at ground zero with them.
=================================
Mystery Solved: The WTC Was Nuked on 9/11
http://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/

The report is way too extensive to cut a paste here.  All the info is at the above link.  Draw your own conclusions.

To put the use of NUKES as a way to bring down the World Trade center towers in a FAUX category shows ignorance to 10th level.

There are a group of people who want us all to believe that thermite alone brought down the NY towers which is absurd because thermite CUTS NOT DISSOLVES structural steel.

I don;t know enough about this report or it's author to say the info is or is not accurate but once you bring up the PLAUSIBLE nuclear answer to the demolition question moderators on this forum go ape and they don't have ANY good reason to do so except chirp 'no planes' which makes ZERO sense.

[EvadingGrid]

Actually to calculate the depth its safe to detonate a nuke we calculate :
"scaled depth of burial"

This figure is calculated as the burial depth in metres divided by the cube root of the yield in kilotons.
It is estimated that, in order to ensure containment, this figure should be greater than 100.

5.31329284591 is the cube root of the 150 kilotons
77 m is the burial depth

Which gives us 14.4919548448 . . . .
This figure is well short of the required 100 . . .

In other words 77m is way to shallow for a 150 Kiloton Blast

* calculating cat  puts down abacus

No more troll whines.
Understand that figure needed to be an awful lot closer to 100.
Sorry, but being about 85% short of the required figure does not cut the mustard.

Because I did the f**king maths

[worcesteradam]

isn't micronuke an oxymoron, though