sure happy to! see how annoying he is BTT?
Ok Unicus, can you please now explain this lot away for me?
You say there is no evidence that the govt is spraying chemicals in the skies above us.
I say if you believe this then you have not realy researched the facts.
Let me help you out there with a few documents - mostly wrote by the governments not "conspircay" nuts:
1) The UK govt has previously sprayed the population of the UK with several germ warfare agents attached to cobwebs. Some were simulated (non harmful) bacteria (that still managed to cause respiratory issues in people with bad chests) others were purposefully weaponised. The closing comments state they cannot say if they still do this because THEY CANNOT COMMENT ON ONGOING RESEARCH. ONGOING. Therefore, bearing this in mind, the argument that "the govt would'nt do this without permission " and "they have to breathe the same air they would'nt do that" fall flat. And if they`ll do it with germ warfare agents - they will do it with other stuff too, stands to reason.
Millions were in germ war tests
Much of Britain was exposed to bacteria sprayed in secret trials
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience2) A simple "site:.mil " search on google for stratospheric aerosols will prove that there are hundreds if not thousands of documented "aersosol" release experiments during which metals / chemicals / compounds were released into the atmosphere by :
Specially adapted exhaust plume generators on aircraft
Rockets
From ships!
examples:
Global Stratospheric Impact of Solid Rocket Motor Launchers
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA413823Aerial Spraying (page
http://www.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-051013-001.pdfCloud Seeding (page 10)
http://www.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-051013-001.pdfDr. Paul Bernhardt Elected IEEE Fellow
Dr. Bernhardt's research interests have been primarily in the areas of ionospheric modification with high power radio waves and chemical releases and satellite based radio-beacon sensing of space plasmas.
Dr. Bernhardt has pioneered the use of chemical releases to study the ionosphere. His ionospheric modification experiments have been monitored with Incoherent Scatter Radar (ISR) systems around the world and with in situ plasma probes provided by NRL's Plasma Physics Division. The 1992 NRL Ionospheric Focused Heating (IFH) experiment, combined chemical release and high-power radio wave technology to produce the highest level of plasma turbulence ever measured with the Arecibo ISR
http://www.nrl.navy.mil/pao/pressRelease.php?Y=2006&R=17-06rWhy do they do this? Well now rhere are several reasons:
1) To create an aerial antenna (a metal layer that can "bounce" military signals around the globe without the need for ground relay stations.
2) To block satelittle comms (up and down links)
3) To increase the Albedo (reflectiveness) effect of the planet - mimicking volcanic releases of sulphur dioxide and other chemicals to "combat global warming"
4) To better mess with the ionosphere during ionospheric research experiments
The last one is of particular concern to me, because the "chemicals " they use are in fact heavy metal. The worst of these research sites is Haarp.
There is some evidence that haarp can utilise these trails of metal to send HF radiowaves around the planet with potentially devastating consequences.
For anyone not familiar with haarp and its ilk, a little peice I wrote:
http://mikephilbin.blogspot.com/2010/11/guest-blogger-nikki-wade-holes-in-sky.htmlWhile lower level stratospheric aerosols released from normal jet aircraft have been commonly known about fo some time, it is now possible to confirm that THEY ARE ALSO SPRAYING VAST QUANTITIES OF ALUMINIUM OXIDE from NASA SPACE SHUTTLE VEHICLES! [reference: NRL Press Release]
They do this either very high up (100km) or at lower levels and they have the means to make rockets "hover" in the same place while they spew the contents of their load over a defined area (not that it stays defined - their experiments show that this stuff spreads at a rate of 100 meters per second via high altitude wind shear which means exhaust from the misappropriately named project CARE (Charged Aerosol Release Experiments) and similar - see photo - over America's east coast would reach us here in the UK in less than 50 minutes! [reference: NRL Press Release]
NRL Rocket Experiment Lights up the East Coast
http://www.nrl.navy.mil/pao/pressRelease.php?Y=2009&R=107-09r
CARE (gotta love the cynicism of that acronym) = CHARGED AEROSOL RELEASE EXPERIMENTS
They do this to "study the ionosphere / stratosphere / magnetosphere they say. They did this above HAARP and found that adding "chemicals" (metals) to the atmosphere enhanced the power of their haarp beam. They can create giant holes in the ozone layer - ON PURPOSE! They fill these holes with MAN MADE PLASMAS to serve military research purposes!
From their press release "A rocket launched from Wallops Island, Virginia, used a delayed firing of the fourth stage to release rocket exhaust into the upper atmosphere at 280 km altitude.
On September 19, 2009, after sunset the CARE dust release was the brightest object in the sky over NRL as viewed from Alexandria, Virginia. The actual release was 200 km off the coast of Virginia at an altitude of 290 km. The dust cloud was produced by a solid rocket motor that remained at a fixed altitude during the engine burn. (Photograph by Dr. John Apruzese of NRL Plasma Physics Division)
The exhaust was composed of aluminum oxide particulates as well as molecules of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and hydrogen. The launch occurred on September 19 at dusk (07:46 pm) to place the 110 kg of exhaust particles in sunlight for easy viewing by cameras on the ground, where the sun had set at that time. The large concentration of dust and exhaust material interacted with the ionosphere to produce a "dusty plasma" with high-speed "pickup ions." Ground-based radars tracked the effects on the ionosphere for over four hours providing valuable data on how rocket motors affect ionospheric densities and providing simulations of natural disturbances in the upper atmosphere."
and more
Glow Away: NASA Lights Up the East Coast Sky with a Noctilucent Cloud
Physicists launch rocket to create the first faux "night-shining" cloud on the cusp of space
Clouds come in countless shapes, from fluffy cotton candy to wispy lines that streak across the sky, but they are all formed from one simple ingredient—water vapor. In an experiment conducted September 19, scientists created the first artificial, high-atmosphere noctilucent cloud. But rather than water, the cloud formed from dust particles spewed out of a rocket. . . .
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=noctilucent-cloud-dust-rocket-nasa-wallopsFinally (For now) you claim that there is no evidence of increased aluminium as claimed in "what in the world are they spraying"
Well, your wrong about that too. Please refer to this UK govt doc which states
http://cot.food.gov.uk/pdfs/cotstatementtds200808.pdfCOMMITTEE ON TOXICITY OF CHEMICALS IN FOOD, CONSUMER
PRODUCTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Estimates of dietary exposure to aluminium (high-level intake for adults, preschool
children, young people, institutionalised elderly and vegetarian groups; and
mean-level intake for pre-school children) exceeded the PTWI set by the JECFA and
the EFSA (equivalent to 143 μg/kg body weight/day) by up to 2.4-fold. The current
average population exposure to aluminium (5.4 mg/day) was increased compared to
that reported in the 2000 and 1997 total diet studies (4.7 mg/day and 3.4 mg/day,
respectively).
(Aluminium up each year they test)
Oh, and by coincidence, despite the fact that 13% of the earths crust is made up of aluminium, and always has been, they have now decided to produce "aluminium resistant food crop seeds" Why go to the trouble and expense?
and
As with the results from 1994, the highest levels of barium in the 2006 survey
were reported in nuts (131 mg/kg) and bread (0.81 mg/kg). All other foodstuffs
contained lower levels than in bread. Levels of barium in nuts were double those
reported in 1994 (131 mg/kg and 56 mg/kg, respectively). Estimated average
population dietary exposures to barium have increased by approximately 46% since
the last TDS in 1994. The estimates of dietary exposure to barium for pre-school
children (mean- and high-level dietary intakes) and of high-level intakes by adults,
young people, free living elderly, and vegetarians, exceeded the WHO TDI of 20
μg/kg body weight/day by up to 4.3-fold. Consumption of tap water has the potential
to increase high-level exposure to barium by 60-130%, which could result in a total
11
dietary exposure for high-level intake in pre-school children of 980% of the WHO TDI.
Barium in tap water at 980% of the recommended allowable level for kids !!!
Funny then, that the two chemicals reported to be present in chemtrails are the only two trace metals that have been found to be increasing year on year.
So they are filling the skies with metals like ALUMINIUM, So what? Well. What goes up, must come down. Aluminium HAS NOT BEEN CERTIFIED NON TOXIC ! In fact there is evidence that increased Aluminium levels all over the earth are causing problems. Crops are dying (They have just patented a new "aluminium resistant GMO wheat seed" ) The rate of Altzheimers is known to be increasing and this disease is KNOWN to be linked to ALUMINIUM in the brain. Once it is in your body - it stays there ! It also causes increased immune problems, sinus problems and high blood pressure! You have to be concerned. The rains after they spray this stuff is laden with chemicals! The air before it rains is also full of it. You are breathing it in, eating it, drinking it, every day !
This is a well organised, clearly written website. BUT it is misleading and denies or "debunks" things that can be clearly proven to be true if the readers here would bother to actually go out and read and NOT take the words of Unicus as fact.
