Police Arrested Twelve Year Old Boy for Refusing Vaccine at School

[oyashango]

Police Arrested Twelve Year Old Boy for Refusing Vaccine at School

 Saturday, 04 December 2010 00:20

A child of twelve was charged with ‘threatening behaviour’ at his school in Bowmanville, East of Toronto last week. The arrest happened when the boy (who cannot be named for legal reasons) threw a tantrum refusing the Hepatitis B vaccine. The National Post reported (http://news.nationalpost.com/2010…) that police were brought into Ross Tilley Public School because the boy had threatened to damage the school. Unfortunately, the report failed to give the reason why the child was refusing the vaccine or what made him so angry.


The National Post said:
“Officers consulted with the Crown attorney’s office and charged the boy with threatening, a criminal charge police said was justified: “due to the age of the child and concerns over public safety.”


This may or may not be true; however, at no time did there appear to be any concern for this child’s welfare. There may have been many reasons why the twelve year old did not want to be vaccinated. These range from being afraid of the needle to being worried about the possible side effects.  It could be that Hepatitis B is in fact a disease that is mainly transmitted through sexual intercourse or sharing dirty drug needles!


http://www.wellnessuncovered.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1943%3A-police-arrested-twelve-year-old-boy-for-refusing-vaccine-at-school-&catid=43%3Avaccination-articles&Itemid=12

[birther truther tenther]

Even a 12 year old can figure out civil disobedience.

[s3d1t0r]

What exactly is wrong with a healthy fear of needles?

Also... I hate needles.  I mean really really really hate needles.

The very thought and/or sight of them instantly turns my fight or flight reaction on full blast.

[davidnay]

I see nothing about a boy being arrested for refusing a vaccine. What's with the misleading title?

[MonkeyPuppet]

I see nothing about a boy being arrested for refusing a vaccine. What's with the misleading title?

"A child of twelve was charged with ‘threatening behaviour’ at his school in Bowmanville, East of Toronto last week. The arrest happened when the boy (who cannot be named for legal reasons) threw a tantrum refusing the Hepatitis B vaccine."

As stated, he was arrested for what they deemed "threatening behavior", but his tantrum was due to refusing the vaccine.  It's not really a misleading title since cause is always a matter of perspective when the event resulting in the reported action is often precipitated by something else... i.e. no one dies from a bee sting, but rather their immune system's reaction to it.  Yet, people would say "they died of a bee sting".  The reverse can also be true... i.e. no one would ever claim that a guy that got arrested after robbing a bank was arrested for being destitute, though that may very well be why he robbed the bank.

So yeah, he was arrested for refusing the vaccine.

[davidnay]

"A child of twelve was charged with ‘threatening behaviour’ at his school in Bowmanville, East of Toronto last week. The arrest happened when the boy (who cannot be named for legal reasons) threw a tantrum refusing the Hepatitis B vaccine."

As stated, he was arrested for what they deemed "threatening behavior", but his tantrum was due to refusing the vaccine.  It's not really a misleading title since cause is always a matter of perspective when the event resulting in the reported action is often precipitated by something else... i.e. no one dies from a bee sting, but rather their immune system's reaction to it.  Yet, people would say "they died of a bee sting".  The reverse can also be true... i.e. no one would ever claim that a guy that got arrested after robbing a bank was arrested for being destitute, though that may very well be why he robbed the bank.

So yeah, he was arrested for refusing the vaccine.

Umm.. No. He was NOT arrested for refusing the vaccine. Like you said he was arrested and charged with 'threatening behavior'. You're trying to justify an obviously intentional misleading thread title.

[davidnay]

Why not just change the thread title to 'Police Arrested Twelve Year Old Boy for Threatening Behavior after refusing Vaccine at School'

[MonkeyPuppet]

Why not just change the thread title to 'Police Arrested Twelve Year Old Boy for Threatening Behavior after refusing Vaccine at School'

Not trying to justify... just saying that if they hadn't tried to vaccinate the kid, he would not have had a tantrum about refusing it and would not have been arrested.

Your version of the title is admittedly more fitting, though 

[davidnay]

Not trying to justify... just saying that if they hadn't tried to vaccinate the kid, he would not have had a tantrum about refusing it and would not have been arrested.

Your version of the title is admittedly more fitting, though 

If his mother never gave birth to him, he never would've had a tantrum either..
Maybe we should change the title to 'Kid arrested for being born' 

[Wintermute]

Canada's a hardcore Police State. There's no proof the boy made any threats, it's just what the police are claiming. Let's wait and hear the other side of the story.

[Blowback]

The cops could easily make up a bunch of shit.

If the cops reported to the media that the kid was screaming out
"kill all cops, kill all teachers"

Would you believe them?

I wouldn't.  It's easy for them to justify arresting a 12 year old for not taking his poison like a good girl if they can make up whatever they want.

Just like that kid that got dropped off a bridge last year and tasered like 16 times after he hit the ground.  The cops said he was screaming out "kill all cops" so they had to taser him a bunch of times to "keep him safe from the traffic".

[Valerius]

In the land of the nanny state saying no is a threat.

[birther truther tenther]

If his mother never gave birth to him, he never would've had a tantrum either..
Maybe we should change the title to 'Kid arrested for being born' 

Maybe if you have never have signed up for Prison Planet Forum, we wouldn't have to read your nonsense.

The kid refused a vaccine, the staff claimed he threw a tantrum, he ended up arrested.

This is so clear, I don't even need a stupid analogy, to explain to your troll ass.

[able]

if the boy said no that is the end of the discussion. i have told my kids that if the teachers and nurses ignore my non consent and try to talk you into it then it may well get to the point that they grab you and scream "its for your own good" and hold them down for the injection. they have been instructed to do what ever is necessary to get to me so i can protect them from the zealots.

some of these social workers, nurses and teachers have been taught that non consenting parents are criminally backwards thinking. they are taught that we are endangering the entire planet and our children because vaccines only work if every single man woman and child are injected.

they are akin to the psychopaths wife who chooses to help her husband abduct and rape other women as long as he still love her. they are the real criminals and one day this will be unchallengeable in the history books for my and your great grand children to read.      

[L2Design]

Poor kid...

[Joseon]

If his mother never gave birth to him, he never would've had a tantrum either..
Maybe we should change the title to 'Kid arrested for being born' 

WTF is wrong with you.

[Albert_Pike]

I wonder how long it is before anyone will face criminal charges for refusing vaccines.

[Letsbereal]

Oh! 'threatening behavior' that makes a lot of sense.

Lucky he wasn't excecuted on the spot by some police smada!

[Wintermute]

No updates yet?  I looked up the original article and it makes the point that the boy need not have been charged..

The boy, who cannot be named under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, made a verbal threat against the school, police spokesman Dave Selby told CTV.
Mr. Selby told the broadcaster that officers do have the discretion not to lay a charge but decided the alleged threat was serious enough to be considered criminal.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/11/25/boy-didnt-want-needle-throws-tantrum-charged-with-threatening/#ixzz17Ih76fLZ
 

[Wintermute]

I found a little more info - police allege that the boy didn't threaten any individual, only the building. The police also searched the school for weapons.. as you would when a 12 year old refuses a vaccine.. (sarcasm).

Judy Malfara, a spokeswoman for the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board, said staff contacted police out of concern for other students, who were within earshot when the alleged threats were made.  "The student made several general threats, not against specific individuals, but about damage to the school itself," Ms. Malfara said.

"(Police) officers responded quickly and, after conducting a search, they confirmed that there were no weapons at the school, and that students were safe," the letter stated.

http://www.allvoices.com/s/event-7431067/aHR0cDovL25ld3NkdXJoYW1yZWdpb24uY29tL2FydGljbGUvMTY2Njcw

[Plautus]

Police Arrested Twelve Year Old Boy for Refusing Vaccine at School

This kind of nazi crap makes me want to puke. People often complain about having to get their kids exposed to dangerous vaccines before they can go to school, but they rarely ask why if that school is so dangerous are they sending their kids there in the first place? I'll lock my kids in a closet forever before I ever let some school get ahold of them.

[Kilika]

I'm curious. Since when did children under the age of 18 become adults that are responsible for their own actions?

Back in the day, if a kid acted up, the schools would paddle that backside, then send the child home where they most lilkely would get a second round of the "board of education".

Next thing we know, the cops will be busting toddlers for tossing their pacifiers for committing an act of terrorism.

[Albert_Pike]

Anyone refusing a vaccine will be considered a domestic terrorist, or will probably face prison time and Tens of Thousands in fines.

[Albert_Pike]

a really scary place right now to refuse vaccines is developmental preschool, preschool, elementary    =(

They want to poke them when their still growing. God knows what kinds of horrors these vaccines do to the genetic coding of these poor kids during their essential stages of mental and physiological development. Infertility, cancer, disease and early death?

I don't plan on ever becoming a parent, so I say go ahead and sterilize me. Just don't give me cancer or some other ailment with your eugenics injections and Nazi medicine.

[Anti_Illuminati]

I see nothing about a boy being arrested for refusing a vaccine. What's with the misleading title?

Umm.. No. He was NOT arrested for refusing the vaccine. Like you said he was arrested and charged with 'threatening behavior'. You're trying to justify an obviously intentional misleading thread title.

Why not just change the thread title to 'Police Arrested Twelve Year Old Boy for Threatening Behavior after refusing Vaccine at School'

I agree, and well stated.  If he really did threaten do damage private property--that is inexcusable, but his parents should have been called--a threat from a 12 year old doesn't justify police involvement.  Your response shows that this forum needs to support much longer thread titles to do the topic justice and to be more accurate.  It should support at least 50 more characters for thread titles.

Maybe if you have never have signed up for Prison Planet Forum, we wouldn't have to read your nonsense.

The kid refused a vaccine, the staff claimed he threw a tantrum, he ended up arrested.

This is so clear, I don't even need a stupid analogy, to explain to your troll ass.

It's not fair to call him a troll, when the post of his that I quoted is 100% legitimate.  When other people see thread titles that are really unsubstantiated--you are only fueling others to have something to discredit you on.

Even cops are innocent until there is sufficient evidence that they are lying.  One cannot say that just because cops have fabricated excuses before, that that is always happening in every case.  It is irresponsible.  A thread title as davidnay suggested 'Police Arrested Twelve Year Old Boy for Threatening Behavior after refusing Vaccine at School' is fact based and enables the reader to interpret the information however they end up doing so--without someone having done that for them pre-emptively.

Now there are cases where "sensationalist" thread titles are appropriate, AND factual--I have used many of them myself--however, the contents of what I post will lead anyone that has any real investigative/analysis skills to see that my thread titles are not bullsh*t.  An example of one such thread is one where I stated that:  "The entire planet is being converted into an autonomous assassination grid."  There are mountains of documented fact that prove this is reality and not me "fearmongering".

[Albert_Pike]

In the very near future, anyone who refuses a vaccine what any reason, will probably be put on some sort of government watch list. In the distant future, many of these exact same people whom refuse a vaccine (at gunpoint) will probably be shot right there and then. While their sheep counterparts (people who aren't on the list) will take their vaccine and get a pat on their head by a uniformed official, and maybe an itunes gift card or Justin Bieber album.

[Plautus]

In the very near future, anyone who refuses a vaccine what any reason, will probably be put on some sort of government watch list. In the distant future, many of these exact same people whom refuse a vaccine (at gunpoint) will probably be shot right there and then. While their sheep counterparts (people who aren't on the list) will take their vaccine and get a pat on their head by a uniformed official, and maybe an itunes gift card or Justin Bieber album.

I think it could get even worse than you describe. As I pointed out in my thread about vaccines, a small percentage of vaccinated people could spread a disease that's lethal to the non vaccinated population.

[Joseon]

I agree, and well stated.  If he really did threaten do damage private property--that is inexcusable, but his parents should have been called--a threat from a 12 year old doesn't justify police involvement.  Your response shows that this forum needs to support much longer thread titles to do the topic justice and to be more accurate.  It should support at least 50 more characters for thread titles.
It's not fair to call him a troll, when the post of his that I quoted is 100% legitimate.  When other people see thread titles that are really unsubstantiated--you are only fueling others to have something to discredit you on.

Even cops are innocent until there is sufficient evidence that they are lying.  One cannot say that just because cops have fabricated excuses before, that that is always happening in every case.  It is irresponsible.  A thread title as davidnay suggested 'Police Arrested Twelve Year Old Boy for Threatening Behavior after refusing Vaccine at School' is fact based and enables the reader to interpret the information however they end up doing so--without someone having done that for them pre-emptively.

Now there are cases where "sensationalist" thread titles are appropriate, AND factual--I have used many of them myself--however, the contents of what I post will lead anyone that has any real investigative/analysis skills to see that my thread titles are not bullsh*t.  An example of one such thread is one where I stated that:  "The entire planet is being converted into an autonomous assassination grid."  There are mountains of documented fact that prove this is reality and not me "fearmongering".

A temper tantrum could mean anything. THese coppers lie and that is well known amongst the public. THere is NO reason to put the police in the scene unless a crime was being committed. the action of a crime was not imminent or an immediate danger to everyone by the likes of a 12 year old boy.

I think AI, you were here to scare the bejesus out of everyone with the so called your research. Yet you defend the school and cops on this issue. Who are you really with?