The crazy infighting that is damaging the quest for 9/11 truth

There is something in the truth movement that is making me uncomfortable and that's Judy Wood. Not her research and theories on what happened on 9/11 but the fact that along with those that follow her while playing the victims who claim to be ignored and slated by the rest of the truth movement when they themselves seem to do nothing but attack any who do not go along with what she says. I feel that her claims that the majority of the truth movement are controlled opposition is insulting to people who put a lot of effort into forcing a real investigation to the events of 9/11. I also see a lot of criticism towards The architects and engineers who in my opinion are doing a great job using scientific methods and the evidence that is available to them. To criticize them for not supporting Judy Woods theories is crazy when she and her supporters are hardly acknowledging the hard work and efforts of the architects and engineers who seem to be making good progress in opening peoples eyes to the fact that they have been lied to. I feel there is room within the truth movement for people to examine all theories and to respect the efforts of others even if they do not agree with them. But this infighting can only hurt the movement to the benefit of the New World Order who are probably laughing at all the infighting that is going on. To me the answer is simple, If anyone has real proof of controlled opposition (which I have yet to see) then they need to provide us with it. If they cant then maybe spending less time slating those that do not agree with them and more time on providing proof of their theories would be more beneficial to both them and the quest for the truth.
Article by David Noble