LIST OF SENATORS BRIBED TO SUPPORT S.510 - THE 'FOOD TYRANNY ACT'

[independentWV]

Thanks, IndependentWV!

We have to keep our wits about us now.  They are coming at us from all directions! 

Yes, very true Carlee posted Senators supporting Treason bill by way of payoff
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192850.msg1143967;topicseen#msg1143967

[donnay]

Disgusting Traitors!!!   

[donnay]

Yes, very true Carlee posted Senators supporting Treason bill by way of payoff
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192850.msg1143967;topicseen#msg1143967

Thanks, I just saw that.  Disgusting traitors!!!

[Optimus]

http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_29693.php

Name of Senator - Party & State - Bribe For S.510 or Bribe Against S.510


Daniel Akaka - D HI - Bribe For: $27,690 - Against: $700

Lamar Alexander - R TN - Bribe For: $190,421 - Against: $4,850

John Barrasso - R WY - Bribe For: $31,350 - Against: $27,500

Max Baucus - D MT - Bribe for: $123,803 - Against: $55,980

Evan Bayh - D IN - Bribe For: $45,200 - Against: 8,250

Mark Begich - D AK - Bribe For: $23,050 - Against: $2,000

Michael Bennet - D CO - Bribe For: $38,509 - Against: $22,050

Robert Bennett - R UT - Bribe For: $105,530 - Against: $10,000

Jeff Bingaman - D NM - Bribe For: $31,498 - Against: $8,450

Christopher Bond - R MO - Bribe For: $49,550 - Against: $5,200

Barbara Boxer - D CA - Bribe For: $120,000 - Against: $13,650

Sherrod Brown - D OH - Bribe For: $57,800 - Against: $6,600

Samuel Brownback - R KS - Bribe For: $20,950 - Against: $13,500

Jim Bunning - R KY - Brobe For: $20,700 - Against: $2,000

Richard Burr - R NC - Bribe For: $328,086 - Against: $32,292

Roland Burris - D IL - Bribe For: $0 - Against: $0

Maria Cantwell - D WA - Bribe For: $93,541 - Against: $2,750

Benjamin Cardin - D MD - Bribe For: $72,200 - Against: $0

Thomas Carper - D DE - Bribe For: $83,150 - Against: $0

Robert Casey - D PA - Bribe For: $80,576 - Against: $4,600

Saxby Chambliss - R GA - Bribe For: $557,694 - Against: $108,041

Thomas Coburn R OK - Bribe For: $64,400 - Against: $14,200

Thad Cochran - R MS - Bribe For: $50,144 - Against: $22,000

Susan Collins - R ME - Bribe For: $157,438 - Against: $7,800

Kent Conrad - D ND - Bribe For: $41,650 - Against: $29,612

Bob Corker - R TN - Bribe For: $298,639 - Against: $8,850

John Cornyn - R TX - Bribe For: $286,648 - Against: $254,730

Michael Crapo - R ID - Bribe For: $64,199 - Against: $14,350

Jim DeMint - R SC - Bribe For: $149,935 - Against: $5,000

Christopher Dodd - D CT - Bribe For: $36,400 - Against: $4,500

Byron Dorgan - D ND - Bribe For: $28,200 - Against: $6,000

Richard Durbin - D IL - Bribe For: $151,050 - Against: $19,000

John Ensign - R NV - Bribe For: $76,297 - Against: $10,500

Michael Enzi - R WY - Bribe For: $87,394 - Against: $21,450

Russell Feingold - D WI - Bribe For: $53,854 - Against: $2,200

Dianne Feinstein - D CA - Bribe For: $168,189 - Against: 25,314

Kirsten Gillibrand - D NY - Bribe For: $98,210 - Against: $10,650

Lindsey Graham - R SC - Bribe For: $101,272 - Against: $5,700

Charles Grassley - R IA - Bribe For: $112,150 - Against: $25,500

Judd Gregg - R NH - Bribe For: $26,000 - Against: $0

Kay Hagan - D NC - Bribe For: $36,250 - Against: $3,500

Thomas Harkin - D IA - Bribe For: $138,135 - Against: $40,600

Orrin Hatch - R UT - Bribe For: $102,215 - Against: $11,600

Kay Hutchison - R TX - Bribe For: $127,811 - Against: $103,386

James Inhofe - R OK - Bribe For: $66,744 - Against: $36,430

Daniel Inouye - D HI - Bribe For: $26,350 - Against: $11,200

John Isakson - R GA - Bribe For: $280,995 - Against: $10,100

Mike Johanns - R NE - Bribe For: $159,259 - Against: $59,785

Tim Johnson - D SD - Bribe For: $26,850 - Against: $15,000

Edward Kaufman - D DE - Bribe For: $0 - Against: $0

John Kerry - D MA - Bribe For: $14,406 - Against: $250

Amy Klobuchar - D MN - Bribe For: $149,778 - Against: $16,250

Herbert Kohl - D WI - Bribe For: $300 - Against: $0

Jon Kyl - R AZ - Bribe For: $363,660 - Against: $58,906

Mary Landrieu - D LA - Bribe For: $73,622 - Against: $2,250

Frank Lautenberg - D NJ - Bribe For: $37,883 - Agqinst: $3,550

Patrick Leahy - D VT - Bribe For: $13,800 - Against: $2,750

Carl Levin - D MI - Bribe For: $49,900 - Against: $2,000

Joseph Lieberman - I CT - Bribe For: $121,075 - Against: $0

Blanche Lincoln - D AR - Bribe For: $347,526 - Against: $125,297

Richard Lugar - R IN - Bribe For: $153,579 - Against: $21,000

John McCain - R AZ - Bribe For: $118,070 - Against: $21,525

Claire McCaskill - D MO - Bribe For: $48,950 - Against: $7,650

Mitch McConnell - R KY - Bribe For: $439,593 - Against: $42,244

Robert Menéndez - D NJ - Bribe For: $183,850 - Against: $250

Jeff Merkley - D OR - Bribe For: $27,350 - Against; $3,300

Barbara Mikulski - D MD - Bribe For: $52,165 - Against: $1,000

Lisa Murkowski - R AK - Bribe For: $164,713 - Against: $5,800

Patty Murray - D WA - Bribe For: $136,500 - Against: $3,150

Ben Nelson - D NE - Bribe For: $254,906 - Against: $44,950

Bill Nelson - D FL - Bribe For: $205,471 - Against: $35,748

Mark Pryor - D AR - Bribe For: $115,550 - Against: $16,565

John Reed - D RI - Bribe For: $29,350 - Against: $0

Harry Reid - D NV - Bribe For: $133,985 - Against: $10,000

James Risch - R ID - Bribe For: $56,750 - Against; $36,050

Pat Roberts - R KS - Bribe For: $167,294 - Against: $65,186

John Rockefeller - D WV - Bribe For: $21,250 - Against: $1,000

Bernard Sanders - I VT - Bribe For: $7,800 - Against: $4,200

Charles Schumer - D NY - Bribe For: $175,185 - Against: $14,200

Jefferson Sessions - R AL - Bribe For: $65,303 - Against: $16,800

Jeanne Shaheen - D NH - Bribe For: $17,090 - Against: $7,300

Richard Shelby - R AL - Bribe For: $73,616 - Against: $10,000

Olympia Snowe - R ME - Bribe For: $78,136 - Against: $2,000

Arlen Specter - D PA - Bribe For: $209,124 - Against: $9,400

Debbie Ann Stabenow - D MI - Bribe For: $84,941 - Against: $14,482

Jon Tester - D MT - Bribe For: $21,250 - Against: $61,550

John Thune - R SD - Bribe For: $218,900 - Against: $55,625

Mark Udall - D CO - Bribe For: $34,435 - Against: $45,050

Tom Udall - D NM - Bribe For: $27,102 - Against: $51,900

David Vitter - R LA - Bribe For: $188,225 - Against: $8,500

George Voinovich - R OH - Bribe For: $103,850 - Against: $185

Mark Warner - D VA - Bribe For: $116,450 - Against: $8,600

Jim Webb - D VA - Bribe For: $25,300 - Against: $7,700

Sheldon Whitehouse- D RI - Bribe For: $27,025 - Against: $1,500

Roger Wicker - R MS - Bribe For: $147,650 - Against: $16,250

Ron Wyden - D OR - Bribe For: $58,700 - Against: $4,900

Here's a list of the Special Interest Groups that support S.510 and how much they bribed (I mean donated) to Senators:

Restaurants & drinking establishments $3,217,767
Food and kindred products manufacturing $1,753,503
Milk & dairy producers $1,717,687
Food stores $1,473,532
Beverages (non-alcoholic) $744,551
Vegetables, fruits and tree nut $709,238
American Veterinarian Medical Association $551,750
Beverage bottling & distribution $289,725
Food wholesalers $284,900
Food & Beverage Products and Services $281,137
Fishing $277,984
Chambers of commerce $219,234
Manufacturing $207,740
Food catering & food services $171,835
Confectionery processors & manufacturers $96,438
Consumer groups $6,100
Farm bureaus $0

Here's a list of Here's a list of the Special Interest Groups that sopposed S.510 and how much they bribed (I mean donated) to Senators:


Milk & dairy producers $1,717,687
Livestock $1,561,207
Farm organizations & cooperatives $412,976
Consumer groups $6,100
Farmers, crop unspecified $0

[usefulidiot,uselesseater]

This calls for a sticky 
This should not be forgiven or forgotten 

[jofortruth]

Here's the vote on cloture:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00251#position

[L2Design]

Disgusting Traitors!!!   

EXACTLY!!! THESE MOTHERF**KERS ALL NEED TO GO!

[Kinpa]

 im writing them now and telling them so, this pisses me off~! both my senators sold their vote, and my right to grow produce?? WTF?? my farmer grandfather is rolling in his grave~!

[1776Rebirth]

Wrong, unless you think every man, woman, and child in America should be forcibly felt up for their own good -- but good try at instigating senseless in-fighting.

Equally important  (Yes, it is possible -- for those of us that can walk and chew bubble gum at the same time.)

Hey, do you walk to schol or carry a lunch?

so let me get this straight...you think some goons at the airport grabbing ass is more important than fascists controlling the supply, pricing and regulation of all the food??

He who controls the food, controls the people - ALL of the people. I'll point you to Africa as an example of what happens when fascists control food supplies.

And don't get me wrong, the TSA issue is NOT a non-issue...it's just not THE issue.

One could argue that the powers that be are actually getting their way by people restricting their own travel through boycotts.....

And before you go around finger-pointing about "in-fighting" REMEMBER THIS - You came onto MY thread about S510 and started running YOUR mouth about the TSA.

So, why don't YOU go work on that bubblegum thing....

[Freeski]

He who controls the food, controls the people - ALL of the people. I'll point you to Africa as an example of what happens when fascists control food supplies.[/b]

And don't get me wrong, the TSA issue is NOT a non-issue...it's just not THE issue.

Good thought-provoking stuff!

But "control" (of anything) is the key.

[citizenx]

rebirth1776,

They are dipping you like frogs in the boiling water (I no longer live in the good old U.S.A.)

The TSA was the first dip.  The Food Safety bill, if enacted another.

If you can't see that, you are blind.

I don't think I'm alone in feeling this way.  I don't think AJ thinks TSA is a fake, or distracting issue, and he does give plenty of time to the GMO foods/Monsanto legislation coming down the pike.  You are way wrong about me and AJ.

And, just because you start a thread around here doesn't make it your little sandbox -- even if you are a mod, IMO -- which thankfully you are not yet.

If you think it's a bubble gum issue, the "TSA thing" why don't you book yourself a short flight at the local TSA-run airport and walk through the X-ray scanner or allow yourself to be felt up by the TSA goons.  Show us all how it's no biggie -- not great loss of human dignity.

Do you think they would be ramming this food bill down people's throats if they had already stood up en masse against the body scanners and groping?

It was a test, my countryman.  So far, we are not doing well.  Yes, many are aginst the TSA procedures, but until we let the PTB know that the intolerable will not be tolerated, there will be more -- much more.

Yes, first they take your dignity and then they take your life.  Ask the real survivors of the Shoah, yes there were and are some.  Dignity is the first thing to go.

I wish I had three hands.  I can only hold my head in the two that I have right now.  I hope some other folk will stand up against this divisive rhetoric.  It really is not my intention to be part of that, but some things just have to be said.

[Freeski]

 

[citizenx]

BTW, rebirth,

Donnay was the op -- not you.  Furthermore, I don't believe she necessarily shares your opinion about the TSA-thing being a non- or fake issue, but I can't speak for her.

[1776Rebirth]

BTW, rebirth,

Donnay was the op -- not you.  Furthermore, I don't believe she necessarily shares your opinion about the TSA-thing being a non- or fake issue, but I can't speak for her.

My thread was moved into this one.

And your reading comprehension sucks.

[citizenx]

Really. I used to teach literature at college, but maybe you are much more knowledgeable and experienced when it come to reading comprehension.

Why don't you enlighten me as to that last remark.

I don't get what it is referring to.  It seemed a little vague to me.   What did I get wrong?  If it is just me, show me (and everyone else).

[1776Rebirth]

Really. I used to teach literature at college, but maybe you are much more knowledgeable and experienced when it come to reading comprehension.

Why don't you enlighten me as to that last remark.

I don't get what it is referring to.  It seemed a little vague to me.   What did I get wrong?  If it is just me, show me (and everyone else).

If you go back and read our little conversation, being the enlightened scholar you are, you will see where you are not only ignoring my position on the matters, that I made very clear, but also replacing my position with the one you want to believe I am taking....I'm no psychologist, but that suggests some kind of mental disorder...

Tell you what. I'm done speaking. When I want to discuss the TSA issue, I'll go to a TSA thread.

Now, prove to everyone that you're not interested in in-fighting, by STFU about the TSA on this thread.

Because, to me, you're looking like a provocateur. I can't speak for anyone else.

[citizenx]

People, this is MUCH more important than the TSA crap...

I started this bullshit?

This is where your thread belonged:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192635

[1776Rebirth]

I started this bullshit?

This is where your thread belonged:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192635

Like I said - provocateur.

This was my original post -

The Senate will not be voting on S510 - "Food Safety Reform Act" until after Thanksgiving, so there is time to get this petition faxed in to your Senator's offices

PLEASE share this link out if you like having a choice in where your food comes from.

http://www.revisit1776.com/S510-petition.htm

People, this is MUCH more important than the TSA crap...

This being the main subject and action point -

PLEASE share this link out if you like having a choice in where your food comes from.

http://www.revisit1776.com/S510-petition.htm

You taught English? REALLY?


What you have been doing is posting TSA issues all OVER this entire thread...about S510

Keeping going...you're doing a great job of outing yourself.

[citizenx]

The Senate will not be voting on S510 - "Food Safety Reform Act" until after Thanksgiving, so there is time to get this petition faxed in to your Senator's offices

PLEASE share this link out if you like having a choice in where your food comes from.

http://www.revisit1776.com/S510-petition.htm

People, this is MUCH more important than the TSA crap...

[donnay]

UPDATE ON FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION
Agribusiness shows its true colors!

Last week, the Senate voted 74-25 to move to consideration of S.510, the Food Safety Modernization Act.  After thirty hours of debate and behind-the-scenes negotiations, the Senators released a final Managers Amendment that includes a compromise version of the Tester-Hagan amendment.  Thank you to all our members who have called and written over the last several months to help protect local foods!

But even though an agreement was reached on the Tester-Hagan amendment last week, the issue is still not over.  The final vote on the bill has been delayed until Monday, November 29, due to disagreements over amendments relating to the health care bill and a ban on earmarks.  And, in the meantime, Agribusiness has shown its true colors.

For over a year, the big Agribusiness trade organizations have supported passage of S.510.  From Agribusinesss perspective, the bill was a win-win: they could absorb the costs of the regulations because of their size; theyd gain good PR for supposedly improving food safety practices; and the competition created by local food producers, which is rapidly growing, would be crushed by the regulatory burdens.

This was only speculation until now.  But when the Senators agreed to include the Tester-Hagan amendment in the bill, to exempt small-scale direct-marketing producers from some of the most burdensome provisions, twenty Agribusiness trade organizations fired off a letter stating that they would now oppose the bill.

The letter from the Agribusiness groups states: y incorporating the Tester amendment in the bill, consumers will be left vulnerable to the gaping holes and uneven application of the law created by these exemptions. In addition, it sets an unfortunate precedent for future action on food safety policy by Congress that science and risk-based standards can be ignored.

http://www.unitedfresh.org/assets/files/Letter%20on%20Passage%20of%20S%20%20510%20and%20Tester%20Amendment.pdf

What science and risk?  No one has produced any data or evidence of any widespread problems caused by local producers and marketed directly to consumers.  All of the major foodborne illness outbreaks have been caused by products that went through the long supply chains of Agribusiness.
Agribusinesss real concern about the Tester-Hagan amendment isnt food safety, but the precedent set by having Congress recognize that small, direct-marketing producers are different, and should be regulated differently than large Agribusinesses.

Agribusiness is trying to convince the Senators to pull the Tester-Hagan amendment back out.  While the amendment is currently part of the Managers Package  the amended version of the bill agreed to by six bipartisan sponsors  nothing is certain until the actual vote.

ACTION TO TAKE
This Thanksgiving week, please take a moment to call or email your Senators to tell them to hold firm on KEEPING the Tester-Hagan amendment part of the bill. 

You can call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 or go to www.senate.gov to find their website (if the phone lines are busy, the best way to reach them is through the Contact Page on their website)

[souijin]

f**k, now I know that our North dakota senators are corrupt. How do I send this to them to get their attention?

[Kinpa]

f**k, now I know that our North dakota senators are corrupt. How do I send this to them to get their attention?

just google "write my senator" and youll get their webpage, from there its easy, find yours and email them...

[donnay]

just google "write my senator" and youll get their webpage, from there its easy, find yours and email them...

Only to get a boiler plate response from their aids--

Dear Concerned Consumer,

Thank you for contacting us, we will take it under advisement...

Unless, you would like to make a contribution to change the Senator's mind?

Thank you,

Sincerely,

Benedict Arnold's staff

[attietewd]

bump

[citizenx]

so let me get this straight...you think some goons at the airport grabbing ass is more important than fascists controlling the supply, pricing and regulation of all the food??

Again, they wouldn't even be thinking about touching our food supply if we hadn't let them fondle our testicles and our wives hoo-hahs, and our childrens' little willies and hoo-hoo's.

He who controls the food, controls the people - ALL of the people. I'll point you to Africa as an example of what happens when fascists control food supplies.

Quite agree that that is where they are going next.  No argument and it is very serious. No argument.

And don't get me wrong, the TSA issue is NOT a non-issue...it's just not THE issue.

Then you HAVE changes your tune because you called it "crap" and a "bubble-gum issue" -- like bubble-gum rock I suppose.

One could argue that the powers that be are actually getting their way by people restricting their own travel through boycotts.....

Umm...yeah.  That is some completely backwards-ass thinking.  Why not use our financial power to make a statement.  Don't fly if you don't have to.  Many won't this Thanksgiving.  Good idea, IMO.

And before you go around finger-pointing about "in-fighting" REMEMBER THIS - You came onto MY thread about S510 and started running YOUR mouth about the TSA.

A.  Just cause you started it don't necessarily make it YOURS around here.  B. I responded to your absurd post about the TSA issue being "crap" after it was moved to Donnay's thread.  C. I had already responded to Donnay's original thread (that's why I even saw your absurd statement in the first place.

So, why don't YOU go work on that bubblegum thing....

So, now you are back to caling the TSA issue "bubble-gum".  Splitsophrenic much?  Maybe, it's you that needs a shrink.

[citizenx]

In the wake of S.510 Fake food safety….it won’t be a matter of what’s for dinner….but will we have dinner?
November 14, 2010 by ppjg

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved


_______________________________________________

I can only imagine the salivating occurring behind the scenes in the District of Criminals, as the corporations and interested parties including the World Trade Organization, Codex Committees and other vested stakeholders anticipate the passage of S.510, the fake food safety bill.  Should this bill pass, we as a country will be officially divested not only of our sovereignty but of our independence.  No country in the history of the world has survived for long without a strong and independent agricultural sector.  Take that away, and the fall of the country soon follows.  No nation that cannot, or will not, feed its own people, ever survives.  Independent agriculture is and always has been the backbone and the underlying support for economic stability and security.  It is this support and security that S.510 seeks to destroy.

S.510 is not about food safety; it is however the last lynchpin in the seizure of food production and supply that was begun under Bush the Lesser.  Control the food; control the people.  

This same model envisioned in S.510 was used in recent years in Poland.  An estimated 60% of Polish farms are now gone.  In India, more than 8 million farmers have left their farms as a result of similar systems implemented by the World Trade Organization on behalf of bio-pirates of all kinds.  Here in the US an estimated 1/3 of all farms that existed in 2000, have now vanished.  We are, according to farmaid.org , losing 3-500 farms and ranches every week as the industrialized corporate machine being driven by congress and its agencies rolls across our land.  Food safety never was the issue.  Food as a Weapon is another story.

continued -- entire article:

http://ppjg.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/in-the-wake-of-s-510-fake-food-safety-it-wont-be-matter-of-whats-for-dinner-but-will-we-have-dinner/

Of How The Government Is Attempting To Take Total Control Of Our Food, Our Health, Our Money And Even Our Dignity

excerpts:


#1 Taking Total Control Of Our Food - S. 510 "The Food Safety Modernization Act"

S. 510, "The Food Safety Modernization Act", is another huge power grab by the FDA and the federal government over our food supply.  The bill is written so broadly and so vaguely that nobody really knows what it means.  The potential for abuse of these vague new powers would be staggering.  So will the government abuse these powers?  Those who are in favor of the bill say that of course the government will be reasonable, but those who are opposed to the bill point to all of the other abuses that are currently taking place as evidence that we simply cannot trust the feds with vague, undefined powers.


#2 Taking Total Control Of Air Travel - The Dehumanizing Full Body Scanners And "Enhanced Pat-Downs"

Totalitarian governments throughout history have always sought to dehumanize their subjects.  Sadly, that is exactly what is happening in America today.  If you want to get on an airplane in the United States, you will now be forced to either let TSA agents gawk at your naked body or let TSA agents grope your entire body including your genitals.


http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/full-spectrum-dominance-8-examples-of-how-the-government-is-attempting-to-take-total-control-of-our-food-our-health-our-money-and-even-our-dignity

[Kinpa]

Only to get a boiler plate response from their aids--

Dear Concerned Consumer,

Thank you for contacting us, we will take it under advisement...

Unless, you would like to make a contribution to change the Senator's mind?

Thank you,

Sincerely,

Benedict Arnold's staff

yup, but at least somebody's time will be wasted going through the email...i threatened that i will campaign against them using this info...the more emails they get saying this will at the least cause them some worry...

[mayb]

The Bill passed

[1776Rebirth]

The Bill passed

Yep, sadly.

Now the non-compliance begins

[hardrain77]

Hot mic catches senator saying lame duck agenda is "all rigged"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aDZy6zWeio&feature=player_embedded

[independentWV]

This bill must be reconciled and pass yet another vote...AND WE MUST STOP IT NO MATTER WHAT OR WHO WE ARE UP AGAINST!

It is not over. 

Jay Rockefeller does not live in WV and did not visit even for last reelection. We can fight back!

[charrington]

http://www.naturalnews.com/030440_Food_Safety_Modernization_Act_Senate.html

Senate Bill 510 has already passed committee and is on the Senate calendar. It calls for enhanced expansion of FDA authority over small farms, ranches, and other food producers, establishes burdensome administrative requirements for large and small operations, and arbitrary legal authority to recall "unsafe medications," the definition of which is not clearly established; if in line with the global standard set by Codex Alimentarius, "unsafe medications" could extend to dietary supplements and herbal products. There is language that currently exempts from heavy regulation dietary supplement manufacturers and packagers. However, the FDA and its agents are notorious for interpreting regulations their own way.

How they voted so far
Here's how the senators voted on the motion to send S.510 to a full floor vote: (this is a procedural vote to move the bill forward so that it can be voted on for final passage)

Who voted in FAVOR of moving S.510 forward

Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Brown (R-MA)
Burr (R-NC)
Burris (D-IL)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Coons (D-DE)
Corker (R-TN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
LeMieux (R-FL)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lugar (R-IN)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (D-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Thune (R-SD)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Who OPPOSED S.510

Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Graham (R-SC)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Nelson (D-NE)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Wicker (R-MS)

I see a lot of "D" s ...

[citizenx]

It was falsely sold as progressive legisaltion in the spirit of Sinclair Lewis' The Jungle.  That book was an early insptiration for the progressive movement in America and was used to usher in the first round of significant business regualtion (since the "Gilded Age") which even then largely benefited big business.