PrisonPlanet Forum
May 21, 2013, 08:47:53 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!!  (Read 3142 times)
Themistocles
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 100



« on: October 13, 2010, 11:13:38 AM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQTOqXC0qYs&feature=aso

This is absolutely stunning!! We are living in the twilight zone!
Logged
ImpeachBarrySoetoro
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 163


« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2010, 11:18:28 AM »

You mean Soetoro?
Logged
redeux
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 752


I challenge any NWO member to a fist fight


« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2010, 11:23:13 AM »

!@#$%^&*()_+_)(*&^%$RTY^&*()__)(*&^%$#$%^&*()_!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sorry I was typing in a fit of rage....
Logged

Protect your manhood, demand Testosterone..........
Scarbo
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 772


« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2010, 11:35:03 AM »

Ninth circuit court is insane, and this is treasonous. Arizona needs to take it to the supreme court and see if they will finally just admit that this country is over.
Logged
Protean
Guest
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2010, 11:48:10 AM »

Not impeach--expose:




"Where's the long form birth certificate?"
That's a good one! He, he, he, ha, ha, ha...
Logged
molarediere
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 557


New World Ordure


« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2010, 11:52:08 AM »

You mean Soetoro?
Soetoro 2008
Logged
Monkeypox
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 15,693


He Loved Big Brother


WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2010, 12:16:42 PM »

Impeach Obama YESTERDAY!
Logged

War Is Peace - Freedom Is Slavery - Ignorance Is Strength


"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson
chris jones
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 14,415


« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2010, 01:11:27 PM »


 That would be a great start, sorry , it won't happen. But if by some wild chance it did, LIL Joey would step in, then of course Hillary is ready if Joe resists.
 

 
Logged
birther truther tenther
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,727


Against all forms of tyranny


« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2010, 01:42:37 PM »

That youtube clip in the first post of this thread shows a direct violation of the 11th Amendment.

Foreign nations can't sue Arizona for anything.
Logged
Kilika
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8,865

Thank you Jesus!


« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2010, 01:44:00 PM »

Well Fox News is well Fox, but they got it right. This is an outrage and downright treason. There is NO constitutional precedent for this at all. The federal government, and particularly the Executive Branch, is undermining the very Constitution and the soveriegnty of it's states by allowing a foreign country to challenge an American state's laws. The feds should be telling these other countries to take a legal hike because it's an internal matter, but instead they open the door for them via our own court system. That's a tyrannical bias on the part of the federal government plain and simple, and illegal. And it all points to the fact that the government of the united States has been taken over by Socialists who are intent on bringing America under the hand of the UN. In other words, treason.
Logged

"For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows."
1 Timothy 6:10 (KJB)
ekimdrachir
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,094


METATRON ON


WWW
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2010, 02:40:02 PM »

Wow the world vs Arizona
Logged

redeux
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 752


I challenge any NWO member to a fist fight


« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2010, 03:23:03 PM »

That would be a great start, sorry , it won't happen. But if by some wild chance it did, LIL Joey would step in, then of course Hillary is ready if Joe resists.
 

 

yep.... this = WE ARE F*CKED.........
Logged

Protect your manhood, demand Testosterone..........
Kilgore Trout
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,633



« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2010, 04:03:31 PM »

Does any birther think that any natural born president has any more allegiance to the people of the U.S than a would be foreign born politician? if you think that you are wrong. These clowns have allegiance to the crown , to Israel and to all the power and material security they can muster , all nations be damned , the U.S is a fatted calf for these parasite "leaders".
Logged

"I do not believe that there were, at the Council of Nicea,
three persons present who believed in the truth of what was set down.
If there were, it was on account of their ignorance."
J. M. Roberts, "Antiquity Unveiled", 1892
TahoeBlue
Global Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,411


« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2010, 04:46:18 PM »

Federal Judge impeachment process:

http://www.legalaffairs.org/webexclusive/debateclub_goodbehavior1205.msp

Article III of the Constitution says that judges "shall hold their offices during good behavior."

To remove misbehaving judges, the Constitution specifies the process of impeachment, but this hasn't stopped members of Congress from trying to figure out how else to get rid of judges they don't like.

In the November | December issue of Legal Affairs, Todd David Peterson concludes that the Constitution's rigorous process for removing judges makes good sense. If firing judges were easier, Peterson says, their independence would be in jeopardy.

Is impeachment the only way for Congress to fire judges?
...
?" One might argue (and, Sai, maybe you will take this up) that the Good Behavior Clause sets a higher standard for federal judges than the Impeachment Clause and that Congress could specify methods for removing federal judges other than through the impeachment process.

There may be some logic to this argument, but it has not met with the approval of history.

In the 206 years since the ratification of the Constitution, no federal judge has ever been removed from office other than through impeachment by the House and conviction after a trial in the Senate.

Although the Supreme Court has never directly ruled that impeachment is the exclusive method for removing federal judges, it has stated so in dicta on a number of occasions. The great majority of scholars (as well as the National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal, established by Congress to examine issues relating to federal judicial tenure) agree that federal judges may not be removed except through the cumbersome impeachment process. The Good Behavior Clause simply does not allow removal of federal judges other than by impeachment. And, more broadly, as Justice O'Connor reminded us, the Clause says to Congress, "Hands off the federal courts."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment
...
One Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Samuel Chase in 1804. He was acquitted by the Senate.

Fourteen other federal judges, including Alcee Hastings, who was impeached and convicted for taking over $150,000 in bribe money in exchange for sentencing leniency.

The Senate did not bar Hastings from holding future office, and Hastings won election to the House of Representatives from Florida. Hastings's name was mentioned as a possible Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, but was passed over by House Speaker-designate Nancy Pelosi, presumably because of his previous impeachment and removal. Source U.S. Senate
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!