PrisonPlanet Forum
May 23, 2013, 12:03:44 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Report Calls for “Infiltration” of 9/11 Sites  (Read 3993 times)
Eckhart Tolle
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,508



« on: August 29, 2010, 11:35:00 PM »

Report Calls for “Infiltration” of 9/11 Sites
August 29, 2010
Source: 9/11 Truth News
August 29, 2010
Source: 9/11 Truth News



http://911truthnews.com/report-calls-for-infiltration-of-911-sites/

A new report released by a think tank called Demos warns of the hazardous effects of conspiracy theories on society and recommends strategies for governments to mitigate these effects, including the infiltration of websites.

The report, called The Power of Unreason: Conspiracy Theories, Extremism and Counterterrorism, says “most notoriously and influentially, the ‘9/11 truth movement’ has questioned the official accounts of 9/11 and has become a large and growing political force.”

The authors note that the 9/11 truth movement is “peaceful”, but make no distinction between the legitimate questioning of the official account of 9/11 and any number of unrelated, and often racist, conspiracy theories.

The Demos report acknowledges that “some conspiracies have turned out to be true. Our institutions and governments have deceived the population to advance hidden and unstated interests”, and goes on to cite Operations Northwoods, the Joint Chief of Staff’s unimplemented plan to stage a false flag Cuban terror attack in 1963, as well as the CIA’s involvement in the Chilean coup of 1973.

But the report is only concerned with limiting the effects of conspiracy theories on operations of the state, not with justice or the accuracy of the historical record. It states:

More broadly, conspiracy theories drive a wedge of distrust between governments and particular communities. Conspiracy theories – such as those that claim 7/7 or 9/11 were ‘inside jobs’ – demolish the mutuality and trust that people have in institutions of government, with social and political ramifications that we still don’t fully understand. This can especially hinder community-level efforts to fight violent extremism.

Demos makes a number of recommendations for governments to combat conspiracy theories, including a call for more government openness.

The report also cites the writings of Cass Sunstein, an Obama appointee who recently called for the “cognitive infiltration” of 9/11 truth groups. The Demos paper in turn calls for government agents to “openly infiltrate” websites and chatrooms in order offer “alternative information” and “plant seeds of doubt”.

The Demos report can be downloaded here.
http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/thepowerofunreason
Logged


US Map of Live Police,Fire,EMS Scanner Streams


www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/

LIVE TV WORLD NEWS STREAMS /w Chat

www.rentadrone.tv/
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2010, 12:00:37 AM »

***CFR and Raytheon Lobbyist have ordered preemptive strikes on the Internet

CFR has issued the directive.

THIS IS A ROCKEFELLER INITIATIVE!!!!!!!!!!!

Coming out next month: OCTOBER SURPRISE:



Defending a New Domain
The Pentagon's Cyberstrategy
By William J. Lynn III

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66552/william-j-lynn-iii/defending-a-new-domain

Summary:  Right now, more than 100 foreign intelligence organizations are trying to hack into the digital networks that undergird U.S. military operations. The Pentagon recognizes the catastrophic threat posed by cyberwarfare, and is partnering with allied governments and private companies to prepare itself.

In 2008, the U.S. Department of Defense suffered a significant compromise of its classified military computer networks. It began when an infected flash drive was inserted into a U.S. military laptop at a base in the Middle East. The flash drive's malicious computer code, placed there by a foreign intelligence agency, uploaded itself onto a network run by the U.S. Central Command. That code spread undetected on both classified and unclassified systems, establishing what amounted to a digital beachhead, from which data could be transferred to servers under foreign control. It was a network administrator's worst fear: a rogue program operating silently, poised to deliver operational plans into the hands of an unknown adversary.

This previously classified incident was the most significant breach of U.S. military computers ever, and it served as an important wake-up call. The Pentagon's operation to counter the attack, known as Operation Buckshot Yankee, marked a turning point in U.S. cyberdefense strategy.  Over the past ten years, the frequency and sophistication of intrusions into U.S. military networks have increased exponentially. Every day, U.S. military and civilian networks are probed thousands of times and scanned millions of times. And the 2008 intrusion that led to Operation Buckshot Yankee was not the only successful penetration. Adversaries have acquired thousands of files from U.S. networks and from the networks of U.S. allies and industry partners, including weapons blueprints, operational plans, and surveillance data.

As the scale of cyberwarfare's threat to U.S. national security and the U.S. economy has come into view, the Pentagon has built layered and robust defenses around military networks and inaugurated the new U.S. Cyber Command to integrate cyberdefense operations across the military. The Pentagon is now working with the Department of Homeland Security to protect government networks and critical infrastructure and with the United States' closest allies to expand these defenses internationally. An enormous amount of foundational work remains, but the U.S. government has begun putting in place various initiatives to defend the United States in the digital age.

THE THREAT ENVIRONMENT

Barack Obama nominates Raytheon Lobbyist to Control Preemptive Wars
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/01/obama_lobbying_ban_hits_realit.html
Posted January 22, 2009 11:06 AM
by Frank James

When is a ban on lobbyists in an administration not a ban on lobbyists in an administration? When you need a lobbyist who knows how the Pentagon works to help run the defense establishment. That's the situation the new Obama Administration finds itself in. Obama nominated William J. Lynn III as his Deputy Defense Secretary in a role that would require Lynn to essentially be the chief operations officer in that mammoth bureaucracy. But Lynn was among, other things, a lobbyist for Raytheon Co., one of the nation's largest defense contractors.  To not violate the new executive order the president signed yesterday, Lynn would require a waiver from the new administration.  That would seem to violate the spirit of Obama's ban, something which numerous people, including the Project on Government Oversight, are now pointing out:

"POGO believes strongly in the revolving door restrictions President Barack Obama has outlined to restore integrity and ethics to government," said POGO executive director Danielle Brian. "It is because we believe so strongly in the positive impact that such a change will have that we urge the President to withdraw his nomination of William J. Lynn III as Deputy Secretary of Defense. President Obama should not compromise his standards and the effectiveness of the Department of Defense by allowing a top defense industry lobbyist to receive a waiver from these standards. The defense industry is in a class of its own among all of the industries that have had a pervasive stranglehold on public policy to advance their own financial interests."

In a 2008 lobbying report, Lynn was listed as part of a Raytheon lobbying team on budget and appropriations issues including the Department of Defense Appropriations Bill, acquisition policy, missile defense, and Foreign Military Financing. The Obama Administration should not allow its ethics standards to begin with a series of waivers and loopholes which immediately undermine its good intentions.



Obama Nominee For Control Over Weapons is Raytheon Lobbyist
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2009/01/president_barack_obamas_strict.html
POSTED: 01:03 PM ET, 01/23/2009 by Derek Kravitz

President Barack Obama's strict new lobbying rules for cabinet members have put his administration in a difficult spot when it comes to one of its top nominees. William J. Lynn III, a former Pentagon official under President Bill Clinton and Obama's choice for deputy secretary of the Defense Department, spent the better part of the past two years lobbying for defense contractor Raytheon, federal records show. Obama's ethics rules state that ex-lobbyists in his administration cannot work on issues they lobbied on for two years:

"2. Revolving Door Ban All Appointees Entering Government. I will not for a period of 2 years from the date of my appointment participate in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my former employer or former clients, including regulations and contracts.

"3. Revolving Door Ban Lobbyists Entering Government. If I was a registered lobbyist within the 2 years before the date of my appointment, in addition to abiding by the limitations of paragraph 2, I will not for a period of 2 years after the date of my appointment:

(a) participate in any particular matter on which I lobbied within the 2 years before the date of my appointment;
(b) participate in the specific issue area in which that particular matter falls; or
(c) seek or accept employment with any executive agency that I lobbied within the 2 years before the date of my appointment.

That rule complicates matters for Lynn. It also affects William V. Coor, the nominee for deputy secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services, who has lobbied for the nonprofit Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. But Coor has pledged not to work on any tobacco issues in his new job. Lynn, however, lobbied the Pentagon on so many Raytheon projects -- acquisitions policy, space, intelligence and command and control, among others -- that it might be hard to find an area within the department that was untouched by his previous work.



2009-             Dept of Defense, Obama               Deputy Secretary of Defense
2002-2008   Raytheon Co    Lobbyist
2001-2002   DFI International                           Exec VP
1997-2001   Dept of Defense, Clinton                Undersec (Comptroller)
1993-1997   Dept of Defense, Clinton                Dir, Prgrm Analysis & Evaluation
1987-1993   Kennedy, Edward M                       Legislative Counsel
1985-1986   Institute for Defense                      Analyses Prof Staff   
1982-1985   Center for Strategic & Intl Studies    Exec Dir, Defense Project

http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/rev_summary.php?id=31517



William J. Lynn to serve Raytheon as Deputy Secretary of Defense
http://jotman.blogspot.com/2009/01/william-j-lynn-to-serve-raytheon-as.html
Saturday, January 10, 2009

Congratulations are in order to defense contractor Raytheon. The company's former Sr VP, Govt Ops & Strategy, will be brought on to help the defense industry run the Pentagon for the next four years. It was not altogether clear to some naive observers that this day would come. After all, as ABC News reports:

President-elect Barack Obama's pick to be deputy secretary of defense, William Lynn, violates his campaign pledge that no lobbyists will be allowed on his team working on subjects they've recently lobbied on, Transition officials acknowledged Friday. Officials say they were aware that Lynn had lobbied for defense giant Raytheon as recently as last summer, but they defended their pick. [Obama spokesman's justification for the hire printed here. Rest assured is the most qualified person available to serve the defense industry.] Lynn, a former undersecretary of defense in the Clinton administration, currently serves as senior vice president of government operations and strategy at Raytheon, a military contractor. The deputy defense secretary traditionally supervises hiring such contractors.

It's lucky for Raytheon that Obama did not allow prior promises to voters to muddle the priorities of the defense industry. After all, not only the next big defense procurement, but the whole trajectory of US defense policy might have been been put in unfamiliar hands.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2010, 12:03:14 AM »

Is it even possible to be even more of a nazi than Jay Rockefeller?



Experts Caution Against Federal Web Regulations
http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/08/26/29911.htm
By AVERY FELLOW

     WASHINGTON (CN) - The federal government is "flirting with killing the goose that laid the golden eggs" by contemplating stricter Internet regulations, an ACLU director cautioned Thursday.
     At the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, Jay Stanley, public education director of the American Civil Liberties Union, acknowledged that it's important for the government to set Internet security standards for facilities such as power plants and public schools. But he said federal officials should be wary of violating personal liberties by implementing stifling Internet regulations.
     Much of the wealth in the United States is based on the Internet, Stanley said. Strict government regulation threatens to "kill the goose that has laid many golden eggs," he said.
     "The Constitution is not a suicide pact," added the Heritage Foundation's Paul Rosenzweig, quoting the oft-used phrase. "We cannot allow a virus to take down the entire electric grid in fear of violating personal liberties."
     He said government intelligence agencies should work hard to balance Internet security and personal liberties.
     Stanley said he fears that the latest embodiment of the government effort to protect its computer networks, dubbed Einstein 3, will employ "threat-based decision making," making pre-emptive calls on who poses an Internet threat.
     The new system might include personally identifiable information, using a database of signatures to attack malicious code, Stanley said. The system could be placed on the servers of private Internet providers, blurring the line between government and private industry.
     President Obama has promised that the government will not monitor private traffic as part of its cybersecurity initiative, but Stanley remained skeptical.
     "We don't trust that that will remain true," he said. "Security imperatives and security dynamics have a life of their own."
     He added, "What we don't want is watch lists for the Internet." Stanley compared Internet watch lists to "Kafka-esque" no-fly lists in the airline industry that are "based on sloppy lists and questionable computer algorithms."
     Stanley also objected to the notion of needing a license to use the Internet, saying it would eliminate useful discussions in which people can anonymously voice opinions about those in power.
     "We do not want to ruin all that," he said.
     He said giving the government the power to shut down the Internet in the case of an emergency would pose the greatest risk to the freedom of speech and association. Right now, Stanley said, it is easier to see how that kind of power could be abused than how it may prove useful. If it were employed, he added, it would require well-defined parameters as well as checks and balances.
     Rosenzweig said there was no way to stop people or companies from creating profiles based on Internet users' search, travel and shopping data.
     "It's a lost cause," he said.
     With increasing computer power and storage space, Rosenzweig said, "the half-life of secrets is plummeting dramatically."
     Even if the United States shut down analytical capacity, he said, countries such as China or India might continue to create profiles for U.S. consumers.
     "The game's over," Rosenzweig said.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2010, 08:29:21 AM »

Also up on Prisonplanet.com
http://www.prisonplanet.com/government-think-tank-calls-for-infiltrating-conspiracy-websites.html

------

Furious that state involvement in major terror attacks is being exposed to a wider audience than ever before via the Internet, a UK think tank closely affiliated with the Downing Street has called for authorities to infiltrate conspiracy websites in an effort to “increase trust in the government”.

------

You don't increase trust with additional deception and sleaze, you have to earn trust (if you deserve it), which they certainly do not. Sick bastards.
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
Anti_Illuminati
Guest
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2010, 11:38:27 AM »

     "The Constitution is not a suicide pact," added the Heritage Foundation's Paul Rosenzweig, quoting the oft-used phrase. "We cannot allow a virus to take down the entire electric grid in fear of violating personal liberties."

     He said government intelligence agencies should work hard to balance Internet security and personal liberties.

     Stanley said he fears that the latest embodiment of the government effort to protect its computer networks, dubbed Einstein 3, will employ "threat-based decision making," making pre-emptive calls on who poses an Internet threat.

     The new system might include personally identifiable information, using a database of signatures to attack malicious code, Stanley said. The system could be placed on the servers of private Internet providers, blurring the line between government and private industry.

Apparently, the fact that they have been completely exposed that this would be an inside job is not causing them to back off of this high treason.

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact."  WTF kind of wicked psyops is that?  Translation:  "We have to destroy the Constitution, and we will do it by psyoping you by pretending there is such a thing as "balancing" "civil liberties" (a term which implies that the govt. grants them--notice they NEVER USE THE TERM:  UNALIENABLE RIGHTS,).

The people uttering this treason from their mouths should be swarmed by huge numbers of American citizens and forcibly put under citizens arrest for pre-emptively declaring that the Constitution is a terrorist document, WITH THE ADMISSION that they need to dismantle it further.  THEY DO NOT HAVE THE FREEDOM TO DESTROY FREEDOM.
Logged
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2010, 11:55:28 AM »

Apparently, the fact that they have been completely exposed that this would be an inside job is not causing them to back off of this high treason.

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact."  WTF kind of wicked psyops is that?  Translation:  "We have to destroy the Constitution, and we will do it by psyoping you by pretending there is such a thing as "balancing" "civil liberties" (a term which implies that the govt. grants them--notice they NEVER USE THE TERM:  UNALIENABLE RIGHTS,).

The people uttering this treason from their mouths should be swarmed by huge numbers of American citizens and forcibly put under citizens arrest for pre-emptively declaring that the Constitution is a terrorist document, WITH THE ADMISSION that they need to dismantle it further.  THEY DO NOT HAVE THE FREEDOM TO DESTROY FREEDOM.

Attention illuminated nutballs.

We have tried the theory of destroying the constitution to protect ourselves via the "Patriot Act" which was the same as Hitler's "enabling act".

THAT WAS ALMOST 10 YEARS AGO!

YOU FAILED, IT FAILED, THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF DESTROYING THE CONSTITUTION TO GIVE US SECURITY HAS FAILED, IT HAS MADE US LESS SAFE.

THIS IS INCONTROVERTIBLE, IT IS CONFIRMED, DOCUMENTED, ABOVE SUSPICION, AND BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

10 YEARS OF ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL "PROTECTION FROM TERROR" LEGISLATION HAS GIVEN US MORE TERROR. THAT IS THE INTENTION.

THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF DESTROYING LIBERTY TO PROTECT IT HAS BEEN A FAILURE THROUGHOUT HISTORY AND IT IS NOW A PROVABLE FAILURE WHEN APPLIED TO 21ST CENTURY AMERICA.

AND IT WILL PROVE TO BE THE SAME FAILURE IN ANOTHER 2 THOUSAND YEARS!
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
chrisfromchi
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,181



« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2010, 11:13:45 AM »

To the Infiltrators:
I will own you. I will make you work so friggin hard. You'll quit or we'll end up turning you.

To the those paying the infiltrators:
I want 4 million in Euros. I'll stop posting on the internet. i super duper promise.

I assure you will spend more than 10 million in euros attempting this task.

I think its worth it for you to give me a vacation.

This is your only warning.

 Tongue
Logged
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 31, 2010, 12:05:36 PM »

To the Infiltrators:
I will own you. I will make you work so friggin hard. You'll quit or we'll end up turning you.

To the those paying the infiltrators:
I want 4 million in Euros. I'll stop posting on the internet. i super duper promise.

I assure you will spend more than 10 million in euros attempting this task.

I think its worth it for you to give me a vacation.

This is your only warning.

 Tongue

bwaaaaaaahahahaha

damn fine spirit my friend.

Hey illuminutsos...

MORALE IS HIGH!

Your Time and Morale Club of Rome document was WRONG!

Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Libertarian Perspective
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 678



« Reply #8 on: August 31, 2010, 12:10:50 PM »

Even though they will get paid to troll here which I am sure already happens, they will not succeed since they cannot be as motivated as us who are spreading liberty and truth and not some propaganda.
Logged

“Good luck to him. I don’t blame him at all, but I just
wish he had not hit me so hard. I know he had to protect
his property, and I probably would have done the
same thing in his position. This has certainly stopped
me committing any more crime.” - British burglar elaborating robbery
davidnay
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 479



« Reply #9 on: August 31, 2010, 05:50:45 PM »

 "People don’t always know when they’re being lied to, but they always know when they’re being told the truth."
Logged
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2010, 09:39:17 PM »

Attention illuminated nutballs.

We have tried the theory of destroying the constitution to protect ourselves via the "Patriot Act" which was the same as Hitler's "enabling act".

THAT WAS ALMOST 10 YEARS AGO!

YOU FAILED, IT FAILED, THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF DESTROYING THE CONSTITUTION TO GIVE US SECURITY HAS FAILED, IT HAS MADE US LESS SAFE.

THIS IS INCONTROVERTIBLE, IT IS CONFIRMED, DOCUMENTED, ABOVE SUSPICION, AND BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

10 YEARS OF ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL "PROTECTION FROM TERROR" LEGISLATION HAS GIVEN US MORE TERROR. THAT IS THE INTENTION.

THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF DESTROYING LIBERTY TO PROTECT IT HAS BEEN A FAILURE THROUGHOUT HISTORY AND IT IS NOW A PROVABLE FAILURE WHEN APPLIED TO 21ST CENTURY AMERICA.

AND IT WILL PROVE TO BE THE SAME FAILURE IN ANOTHER 2 THOUSAND YEARS!

Wow! Nicely said! It stares you in the face!
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
chris jones
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,431


« Reply #11 on: September 05, 2010, 06:53:30 AM »

"People don’t always know when they’re being lied to, but they always know when they’re being told the truth."
Dave, good on ya.......
Logged
amazon
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,655



« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2010, 04:50:35 PM »

BOOKMARK
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!