Soetoro goes to UN to provoke sanctions against a state of the union

[phosphene]

http://www.aipnews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=16411&posts=1&start=1

Obama Hauls Arizona Before the UN Human Rights Council
August 24, 2010 Ben Johnson, Floyd Reports

Apparently Barack Obama is not content to make a federal case out of his immigration feud with Arizona; he just made it an international one. The president’s first-ever report on U.S. human rights to the UN Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material. So far, one aspect has not been reported: our petty president used the situation to bash Arizona’s immigration law — and possibly transfer jurisdiction over the law from Arizona to the UN. Throughout the report, which sounds like an Obama campaign speech, the president discusses “the original flaw” of the U.S. Constitution, America’s tolerance for slavery, and his version of our long and despicable history of discriminating against and oppressing minorities, women, homosexuals, and the handicapped. After each complaint, he addresses how he is delivering us from ourselves, patting himself on the back for such initiatives as ending “torture,” promoting Affirmative Action, and passing health care legislation. In his section on “Values and Immigration,” he praised the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to provide better medical care for detainees and increase “Alternatives To Detention” (e.g., letting them go). Then he turned to the one state that has had the temerity to stand in his way of fundamentally transforming the American electorate:

A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world. The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined. On Obama’s command, Attorney General Eric Holder has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading, and which merely upholds federal law. (He gave sanctuary cities a pass.) He now threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio for “racial profiling” when arresting illegal immigrants near the Mexican border. Obama’s turns his skirmish with Jan Brewer from a states rights dispute into an international human rights cause. It also places Arizona’s law in the hands of the United Nations.

The national report is but the first step of the international government’s review process. On November 5, the United States will be examined by a troika of UN bureaucrats from France, Japan, and Cameroon (an oppressive nation which is a member of the Organization of Islamic Conference). This trio will consider three items: Obama’s self-flagellating report, reports written about America by UN tribunals or international governing bodies, and testimony from NGOs with a pronounced anti-American bias. It will also consider “voluntary pledges and commitments made by the State,” such as suspending an Arizona state law.

Then the French, Japanese, and Cameroon diplomats will draw up a plan of action for the United States to implement.

Nations are re-examined every four years. The Human Rights Council looks for voluntary compliance. However, its website asserts, “The Human Rights Council will decide on the measures it would need to take in case of persistent non-cooperation by a State with the” World Body. When the Left cannot win at the ballot box (virtually every time), it overrules the people in the courts. Now that Obama is not sure he can prevail in the courts, he has overruled the American people by hauling Arizona and the two-thirds of Americans who support its law before the United Nations.

[JT Coyoté]

"Traitor!"

JTCoyoté

"The moment the idea is admitted into society that
property is not as sacred as the law of God, and
that there is not a force of law and public justice
to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence".  
~John Adams

[Valerius]

"Brewer condemns report to UN mentioning Ariz. law "

By JONATHAN J. COOPER
Associated Press Writer

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press.

http://ktar.com/category/us-news-articles/20100827/Brewer-condemns-report-to-UN-mentioning-Ariz.-law/

[Kilika]

While this is the type of tactic I expect from that socialist clown, this is an outrage from our own president. Are you kidding me? A US president complaining about one of his own country's states to the UN? And actually start a legal investigation against an American state? And where is this mentioned on the nightly news that our president just sold out US citizens to a foreign body? As a resident of Arizona and a natural born citizen of these united States, I'm outraged.

Just as J.T. said, that is Treason!

[Monkeypox]

"Traitor!"

JTCoyoté

"The moment the idea is admitted into society that
property is not as sacred as the law of God, and
that there is not a force of law and public justice
to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence".  
~John Adams

Absolutely!  

Anyone who can look at his actions and not come to that conclusion can not call himself an American, IMO.

We all need to inform everyone we know about Chairman Zero's latest anti-American stunt.

[Dig]

Article XI: 1798 - Sovereign Immunity.

11th Amendment

The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another State or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.

[phosphene]

"Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land ; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.  "

The Feds love their supremacy clause dont they? The DOJ is suing Arizona on the authority of "Judges in every State shall be bound"

And Obama is poking around the UN on the authority of "all Treaties made"

Both perfectly legal. Lawful? I dunno. But perfectly legal. Right there in black and white.

[JT Coyoté]

"Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land ; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.  "

The Feds love their supremacy clause dont they? The DOJ is suing Arizona on the authority of "Judges in every State shall be bound"

And Obama is poking around the UN on the authority of "all Treaties made"

Both perfectly legal. Lawful? I dunno. But perfectly legal. Right there in black and white.

The 11th Amendment was enacted to circumvent any possible misconstruction of article VI and does so clearly... Thus avoiding the same misconstruction you apply above -- Which Madison addressed correctly in his 1796 quote below...

I think Obama and Company are hoping that no one pays attention to the 11th Amendment.  

Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton all chimed in on the subject...

"By the general power to make treaties, the Constitution must have intended
to comprehend only those objects which are usually regulated by treaty, and
cannot be otherwise regulated.... It must have meant to except out of those
the rights reserved to the states; for surely the President and Senate cannot
do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way."
~Thomas Jefferson

"The term supreme, as applied to Treaties, evidently
 meant a supremacy over the State Constitutions and laws, and not over the
 Constitution & laws of the U States And it was observable that the Judicial
 authority & the existing laws, alone of the States, fell within the supremacy
 expressly enjoined. The injunction was not extended to the Legislative authority
 of the States or to laws requisite to be passed by the States, for giving effect
 to Treaties, and it might be a problem worthy of the consideration, though not
 needing the decision of the Committee, in what manner the requisite provisions
 were to be obtained from the States."
~James Madison.
His speech in Congress on the Jay Treaty, March 10, 1796

"The only constitutional exception to the power of making
treaties is, that it shall not change the Constitution.... On
natural principles, a treaty, which should manifestly betray
or sacrifice primary interests of the state, would be null."
~ Alexander Hamilton


"I do not conceive that power is given to the President and the Senate to
dismember the empire, or alienate any great, essential right. I do not think
the whole legislative authority have this power. The exercise of the power
must be consistent with the object of the delegation."
~James Madison

JTCoyoté

[Dig]

The 11th Amendment was enacted to circumvent any possible misconstruction of article VI and does so clearly... Thus avoiding the same misconstruction you apply above -- Which Madison addressed correctly in his 1796 quote below...

I think Obama and Company are hoping that no one pays attention to the 11th Amendment.  

Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton all chimed in on the subject...

"By the general power to make treaties, the Constitution must have intended
to comprehend only those objects which are usually regulated by treaty, and
cannot be otherwise regulated.... It must have meant to except out of those
the rights reserved to the states; for surely the President and Senate cannot
do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way."
~Thomas Jefferson

"The term supreme, as applied to Treaties, evidently
 meant a supremacy over the State Constitutions and laws, and not over the
 Constitution & laws of the U States And it was observable that the Judicial
 authority & the existing laws, alone of the States, fell within the supremacy
 expressly enjoined. The injunction was not extended to the Legislative authority
 of the States or to laws requisite to be passed by the States, for giving effect
 to Treaties, and it might be a problem worthy of the consideration, though not
 needing the decision of the Committee, in what manner the requisite provisions
 were to be obtained from the States."
~James Madison.
His speech in Congress on the Jay Treaty, March 10, 1796

"The only constitutional exception to the power of making
treaties is, that it shall not change the Constitution.... On
natural principles, a treaty, which should manifestly betray
or sacrifice primary interests of the state, would be null."
~ Alexander Hamilton


"I do not conceive that power is given to the President and the Senate to
dismember the empire, or alienate any great, essential right. I do not think
the whole legislative authority have this power. The exercise of the power
must be consistent with the object of the delegation."
~James Madison

JTCoyoté

hahahaha even that backstabbing British Banksters' agent got it right!

wow!

[JT Coyoté]

hahahaha even that backstabbing British Banksters' agent got it right!

wow!

Yep, even a broken clock is right twice a day though... Hamilton is to be handled with care in any case, I mean, Arnold won a Saratoga, but then what... both were driven by gain, utterly.

Here is my latest Infowars Article BTW...

Obama violates Constitution again; elicits UN involvement in Arizona!

J.T. Coyoté
Infowars.com
August 31, 2010

In an unprecedented act of unconstitutional abridgment and over-reaching presidential power, Barack Obama is poised to call the United Nations Human Rights Council vultures down on the state of Arizona.

He is apparently not satisfied with his last 11th Amendment faux pas; the commanding of Attorney General Eric Holder to unconstitutionally sue Arizona for enacting a state law to correct federal inaction on Arizona’s Constitutional request for assistance. Now, as if that wasn’t enough 11th Amendment stumbling, he is bringing the UN into it.

In his report to the United Nations Human Rights Council on human rights in the US, aside from calling for U.N. involvement in Arizona, he leaps right into America bashing.  He points out what he considers flaws in the U.S. Constitution, then toots his own horn as the president who promoted and passed universal health care legislation, and ended “torture” at Guantanamo. As if torture there was the American people’s idea.  Sounding more like a constitutional destroyer than a constitutional scholar, he points out what he calls our human rights inadequacies - discrimination and oppression of ethnic minorities, women,  the handicapped and homosexuals.  Making himself look like the American people’s deliverer, our messiah - it reads like he’s stumping for election, perhaps as Secretary General of the UN.

In this report the federal government will turn over to the UN, control of all action regarding Arizona border policy. Arizona Governor Jan Brewer demanded that it’s new immigration law, SB-1070 be removed from the Human Rights report to the United Nations, which also contains the unconstitutional federal court challenge to the Arizona law, listing it as one of the federal methods used to protect human rights. Governor Brewer, in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that the inclusion of the Arizona law as a human rights violation was not only wrong, but was “downright offensive.” She continues, “The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to ‘review’ by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional.”

This unparalleled call for United Nations intervention to cover federal inaction on the border, and spin it as a civil-rights violation by Arizona, is incorrigible.  Some would call it treasonous.  Arizona has been fighting this illegal immigration problem now for over 30 years, while the federal government has been doing everything it can to avoid the problem.  There are those who will say that the immigration situation is so vast that the only way the federal government can solve it, is by calling on the United Nations.  This is poppycock, pure unadulterated internationalist tripe of the highest order.  He’s merely escalating the Bush open-door immigration policy Americans don’t want, nor can we afford to have continue.

For the president to insinuate civil rights abuses as his reasons, is a slap in the face of the people of Arizona, and the United States. We have bent over backwards and been taxed to the hilt, to accommodate and pay for the 30 million from south of the border who have already entered the country illegally.  The president’s language suggests the beginnings of sanctions, that could escalate into actions similar to those on Iraq after the First Gulf War.  Sanctions that took a first world nation back to Third World poverty in less than two decades. This President’s actions betray his true loyalties, and begins the toppling of the first domino within the United States - Arizona.  To quote Abraham Lincoln, “This nation can never be conquered from without. If it is ever to fall it will be from within.”

http://www.infowars.com/obama-violates-constitution-again-elicits-un-involvement-in-arizona/

Oldyoti

"If the treaty-making power is boundless,
then we have no Constitution."
~Thomas Jefferson

[chris jones]

Truer words were never spoken.
Abraham Lincoln, "This nation can never be conquered from without. If it is ever to fall it will be from within."

[Monkeypox]

Truer words were never spoken.
Abraham Lincoln, "This nation can never be conquered from without. If it is ever to fall it will be from within."

Nikita Khrushchev said the same thing: "America will fall without a shot being fired. It will fall from within."

[usefulidiot,uselesseater]

I was speechless when I heard of this treasonous traitor selling out my home state. This is a low (even for him). Obummers' name will stink in the pages of history! 
Maybe he doesn't understand  the gravity of what he is doing, but his actions will be ridiculed by posterity. History books will remember what this traitor has done.