Secretly forced brain implants: Explosive court case against Government

[charrington]

What I found...is there is no law on the books requiring that informed consent be obtained. More important, I believe there is a need for such a law, as there continue to be cases where this basic right--I do view it as a basic right--is abused. As I started out, I would like to put this on a personal level for everyone of my colleagues. You just think about your own family, your own son, your own daughter, or grandchildren who might be, the next time they go to a doctor, the subject of some medical experiment that they are not even told about. I do not think there can be many things more un-American than that. ~ Senator John Glenn, introducing failed Bill S. 193 to 105th Congress.

___________________________________________________________________

Among greatest human rights violations imaginable

Few American doctors, psychologists and psychiatrists will break rank or brave the new world of high-tech electronic abuse some of their patients report but evidence mounts that increasing numbers of innocent citizens targeted for U.S. state-sponsored terror are being secretly brain implanted with U.S. RFID chips without their consent for no-touch torture and mind control plus experimentation. One man evidenced this in court; won his case; and now prepares for a continuationin federal court, due to be equally explosive.

RFID is abbreviation for Radio-frequency Identification, a misnomer due to the device functions consisting of far more than ID. It is used for remote technological harassment, torture and even assassination.

James Walbert, resident of Wichita, Kansas, proved his experience as a Targeted Individual under surveillance includes forcefully implanted RFID chips, including in his brain, and subsequent remote electronic abuse. Walbert told Sedgwick County, Kansas court panel that Jeremiah Redford threatened him with “jolts of radiation.”

Read More: http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/secretly-forced-brain-implants-explosive-court-case

[Dig]

holy frijoles!

[Optimus]

holy frijoles!

Times 100

[Freeski]

This is a good case to keep an eye on. I poked around for updates but he isn't getting any findable ink.

--------

"I have political support, investigatory support, medical support, psychological support as well for this case." - James Walbert, Kansas

[Femacamper]

What I found...is there is no law on the books requiring that informed consent be obtained. More important, I believe there is a need for such a law, as there continue to be cases where this basic right--I do view it as a basic right--is abused. As I started out, I would like to put this on a personal level for everyone of my colleagues. You just think about your own family, your own son, your own daughter, or grandchildren who might be, the next time they go to a doctor, the subject of some medical experiment that they are not even told about. I do not think there can be many things more un-American than that. ~ Senator John Glenn, introducing failed Bill S. 193 to 105th Congress.

___________________________________________________________________

Among greatest human rights violations imaginable

Don't worry, it's only the mark of the beast brain chip.

[Freeski]

Is this really going on???

From Part 4
http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/ex-ss-fbi-agent-on-rfid-implanted-walbert-and-many-others

--------------------------------

Humans including children secretly implanted by dentists and other medicos

"There are many ways to implant," Taylor stated.

"The most common is during a common surgery procedure or dental procedure where one or more of the procedure team plants the device prior to suturing up the incision. During dental work, this can be easily performed while your under the influence the gas, commonly referred to as 'Laughing Gas'! A small incision can be made on your back or scalp that would not be noticed in a mirror or touch.

Another method is overt or covert injection according to Taylor.

"During any common procedure or even a poke while walking through a crowd can insert a small device that can be used as a locator or influence device. Any number of introduction methods can be and are used to insert these implants.

"Children are easy subjects to implant. They have many childhood inoculations that are required by law.

"They have many childhood mishaps where a device injection point may be excused as a scratch from the playground or slip and fall," sad Taylor.

"Also, look at the amount of children that are in our orphanages around this and other countries. Look at the actions going on in Canada regarding the experiments on orphaned children there," he remarked.

"Do we feel these experiments were limited to just Canadian children?"

[ShadowBroker]

I've got implanted with illegal neuroprosthetics when asleep in my own home. I have had a lot of small circler bruises on my body. Didn't know how a got these at first but now I know. The BION microstimulator is probably close to some of the neuroprosthetics I've got in my body.

When you get mosaic overlay on your vision you just know 100% that you have illegal neuroprosthetics in your body.

[jeremystalked1]

You may already be implanted, and it just hasn't been made obvious to you yet.

http://areyoutargeted.com/2010/08/the-taggant-hypothesis/

[Kilika]

I've got implanted with illegal neuroprosthetics when asleep in my own home. I have had a lot of small circler bruises on my body. Didn't know how a got these at first but now I know. The BION microstimulator is probably close to some of the neuroprosthetics I've got in my body.

When you get mosaic overlay on your vision you just know 100% that you have illegal neuroprosthetics in your body.

I'd venture to guess that you may well have something illegal in your system, but of a more psychedelic variety.

[jeremystalked1]

I'd venture to guess that you may well have something illegal in your system, but of a more psychedelic variety.

... from the guy whose last 40 posts are mostly about his relationship with an imaginary friend.

[Kilika]

... from the guy whose last 40 posts are mostly about his relationship with an imaginary friend.

And your point is?

[jeremystalked1]

And your point is?

I don't know, why did you try to leave the impression ShadowBroker was taking psychoactive drugs?  What was your point?

[Kilika]

With all due respect, what interest is it of yours? I mean if your wanting some kind of explanation, you'd been better off not making comments about my religious beliefs. That simply wasn't called for, and shows you were looking for opportunity rather than considering it a rather weak attempt at humor on my part.

[jeremystalked1]

With all due respect, what interest is it of yours?

I've been going through the same sorts of things ShadowBroker has, and defamation of character attacks implying mental illness or drug use are routinely used against people making these kinds of claims.  So your defamatory remarks are of direct interest to me.

Note that there is plenty of evidence for electronic mind control going back as far as the 60's (with electrodes implanted in animals to remote-control them).  There are also plenty of agencies with obvious interests in these capabilities.  Your religious beliefs are on much shakier ground.

Don't throw stones from your glass house.

[theoph]

I'm extremely interested in this issue because I have also been implanted with a microchip -- it's however a much more specialized chip than a RFID. See my post at: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=227173.0. Here allow me to repeat part of what I tried to communicate there. 

I'm one of the few people who know about, and the only one who can talk about, the bizarre fact that the US government has developed the strange technology to not only read people's thoughts but to remotely control people. It came in the form of a chip inserted into the person's head and which would induce the person into the schizophrenic state of command hallucination. Another chip which accompanies it would transmit voices from the command center to the person in order for him to confuse it as voices coming from his own hallucination. Under the delirious state of command hallucination, he would then do anything the voices are telling him to do. If the US government controller's voice tells him to bang his head against the wall, that's exactly what he will do. Another chip would scan the functional parts of the person's brain with the technology of fMRI and transmit the results back to the control center in order for the American personnel to not only remotely control the person with their command but also to see what the person sees and read what the person thinks. The most frightening part about this technology is that government personnel can remotely control you without anyone, not even you, knowing so.
 
I feel like one of those persons who have been subjected to MK Ultra experiments, except that this technology I'm speaking of is new, coming into service only around 2008 or so. I have been implanted with the chip to read my thoughts. That was late December 2009. It was however not the US government itself which has decided to implant the chip into my head, but the Russians who have commanded, through an International Court order, the US government personnel to "chip" me. How this has come about is a long story;  I was at one time a piece of evidence in a vicious court battle in the International Court of Justice, first between China and United States, and then between United States and Russia. I cannot explain the details here, but can only note here that my being "chipped" with this most advanced technology is the result. The machinery can read my thoughts so accurately that the personnel in the control center seem to be able to read from the computer screen what I am thinking even before I formulate the thought in actual sentences, and it matters not whether I think in this language or that. Furthermore, it seems that they are able to see on their computer screen the precise images I'm seeing -- in which case I have become a walking surveillance camera for them -- or which I'm simply picturing to myself in my head. The amazing thing about this chip is that, when it is allowed to work reversely, to stimulate parts of my brain instead of reading off the stimulation in my brain, the control center can also remotely control me to do simple things. I have been remotely controlled to cough, to dip ashes from cigarettes, to scratch myself, to feel sting at places on my body, to be plagued by migraine headaches, to be cured from headaches, etc. (You might ask why those in the control center would want to remotely control me to do these worthless things; it all had to do with the evidentiary process of the court case I'm referring to.) Now normally I wouldn't even be able to distinguish that I have been remotely controlled to cough and to scratch my head because the remotely induced coughing and scratching felt exactly the same as "natural" coughing and scratching, and this is probably because the remotely controlled physiological functions utilize the same neurological pathways as do the natural ones. (When I was remotely controlled to do slightly more complex things like dip cigarette ashes, however, I did feel a slight difference in my action.) I wrote about how the chip system to remotely control people works in: http://www.lawrencechin2011.com/karinaftrwrd/karinaftrwrdb.pdf (p. 15: "The dispositifs for clandestine remote control of human beings"). I was never told directly by the Russians who chipped me as to how it works, but was only given hints.

Now what do I do? I worry each day that, now that the Court battle has subsided and that there is no more use for either the Americans or the Russians to read my thoughts and remotely control me to do anything, Homeland Security agents may come to me while I am sleeping to pull the chip out of my head. It has been a while since I last felt the effects of the chip in my head. I don't know if it's as easy to pull the chip out as it is to insert it in, but the chip left in my head is my only proof that the extraordinary experience I have gone through with this International Court battle is really true.  I want to act quickly to pull the chip out myself -- filming the whole process in order to have proof of everything -- but I just don't know where to go for this. I have no one to talk to about this; the story is just too bizarre to be even believable. And there is always the most frightening scenario that government agents may have really already pulled it out of my head! (Even if I think it's still there...) I must pull it out before they do. But who can help me on this?

The link to the Examiner story is golden. What if I write to this Deborah Dupre? I did find that she has a website: http://www.deborahdupre.com/ Does anyone else know who is doing research on this topic -- psychoelectronics, government implant? I once discovered this Martin Canon http://www.constitution.org/abus/controll.htm but I can no longer find him anywhere. I hope to have some expert beside me to document my "search for the microchip inside my head". Does anyone have any suggestion? 

[theoph]

I'm becoming very skeptical about the Examiner article to which Charrington offers the link. It's grammatically unintelligible most of the time. Who is this Deborah Dupre? And I found someone else warning us about her: http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2011/09/02/beware-of-deborah-dupre-and-delia-labarr
I'm certainly warded off from writing her. I hope there is someone who can suggest another researcher who deals with this issue. Someone as legit as Martin Canon.   

[theoph]

I can't believe I once feared that government agents, now seeing that I was trying to find the chip inside me, might pull it out of me before I did. After two months of effort, I realize that, while finding it is almost impossible, taking it out will require major, expensive surgery.