PrisonPlanet Forum
May 23, 2013, 05:06:40 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Something that's bothered me about United 93...  (Read 2642 times)
Jerm
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« on: August 02, 2010, 11:05:31 AM »

Hello all, first time poster. Me personally, I've never ever been one to think that 9/11 was an inside job or some sort of conspiracy...ever since it occurred, I believed what we were told and didn't really bat an eye at it. Finally I decided to check out the other side of the story about a year ago and I must say, the farther down the rabbit hole I go the more disturbing, confusing, and sad it gets.

There's a lot of things about 9/11 that don't add up and are baffling...for me there is one about UA93 that I don't think has been touched on much and if it has here...my apologizes...

I find the United 93 thing a little too convenient for my liking...why is it that out of 4 hijackings, this is the only flight we're told tried to fight back against their oppressors and take back the plane? No other flight would seriously try that...esp. if they now they're flying in low into metropolitan areas? Come on, I don't buy that they believed they were really going back to the airports...I know I sure as hell would've tried. We know the other flights had info about the WTCs being struck, so why not fight back? I think this is a huge angle about U93 that has been long ignored or overlooked.


Also United 93 gave us a lot of things...it gave us this heroic story about the passengers bringing down the plane, saving Washington from another attack. It gave us a Hollywood movie...it gave us the uplifting stories of the passengers and their families...it gave us "Let's Roll" and so on and so on. It somewhat to a lesser degree gave us a glimmer of hope and brought something positive out of 9/11...it minutely counter-balanced the other chaos and destruction we saw.

What about Susan McElwain describing damn near to a T a Cruise Missile that she saw come under power lines, bank to the right over a row of trees, and put itself in a position that would've put it right in line with UA93? This woman has nothing to gain from this...talking about it makes for cry for God's sake...why would she lie?

Also isn't just nice that the plane that was brought down was supposedly headed for the White House or Capitol? I'm sorry but if you're OBL or Al Qaeda and you have the audacity to believe you can actually penetrate D.C. airspace with a hijacked aircraft that you plan to dive bomb into something...wouldn't your first and most important target be the White House? I know it would be for me...that's why I couldn't believe 77 was destined for the Pentagon. Hitting that or the Capitol building would've affected the American psyche a lot more than the Pentagon IMO.

Thoughts and views are welcome...

Logged
Scribble
Guest
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2010, 11:17:28 AM »

Yep, there are a multitude of things that don't add up, and as many theories... thus the 911 truth movement.  There is tons of info here and elsewhere.  My take is that 911 wasn't so much a coup de ta, but "proof", or a demonstration of their power over the US, let us not forget the US manufactured anthrax attacks shortly after.
Logged
Jerm
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2010, 11:18:36 AM »

And just to be clear...there's ZERO and I mean ZERO doubt in my mind that UA93 was shot down.

I believed that when I believed the official story and my belief has only grown stronger now that I've joined the truth movement.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!